San Francisco County Municipal Code Art. 49 Procedures for Considering Arrests and Convictions

AND RELATED INFORMATION IN EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING DECISIONS Sec. 4901. Policy. Sec. 4902. Findings. Sec. 4903. Definitions. Sec. 4904. Procedures for Use of Criminal History Information in Employment Decisions. Sec. 4905. Notice and Posting Requirements for Employers. Sec. 4906. Procedures for Use of Criminal History Information in Housing Decisions. Sec. 4907. Notice and Posting Requirements for Housing Providers. Sec. 4908. Exercise of Rights Protected; Retaliation Prohibited. Sec. 4909. Implementation and Enforcement of Employment Provisions. Sec. 4910. Employer Records. Sec. 4911. Implementation and Enforcement of Housing Provisions. Sec. 4912. Housing Provider Records. Sec. 4913. Rulemaking. Sec. 4914. Outreach. Sec. 4915. Other Legal Requirements. Sec. 4916. Preemption. Sec. 4917. City Undertaking Limited to Promotion of General Welfare. Sec. 4918. Severability. Sec. 4919. Operative Date. Sec. 4920. Conflict with Other City Laws.

Editor's Notes: See also Labor and Employment Code Article 142, “City Contractor/Subcontractor Consideration of Criminal History in Hiring and Employment Decisions.” Ordinance 176-13 enacted former Art.49, "Aerial Signs." That article expired pursuant to the terms of its sunset clause (former Sec. 4905) on September 30, 2013. Ordinance 234-06 repealed former Art. 49, which had pertained to parking station revenue control equipment, in its entirety. SEC. 4900. (Former Sec. 4900 added by Ord. 176-13, File No. 130661, App. 7/31/2013, Eff. 8/30/2013; expired 9/30/2013) SEC. 4901. POLICY. It is the policy of the City and County of San Francisco to enhance public health and safety by reducing recidivism and its associated criminal justice costs and societal costs, and facilitating the successful reintegration into society of persons with arrest and conviction records. This Article is enacted for the purpose of furthering this policy. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014)

(Former Sec. 4901 added by Ord. 176-13, File No. 130661, App. 7/31/2013, Eff. 8/30/2013; expired 9/30/2013) (Former Sec. 4901 added by Ord. 61-01, File No. 002197, App. 4/20/2001; repealed by Ord. 234-06, File No. 060892, App. 9/14/2006) SEC. 4902. FINDINGS. After public hearings and consideration of testimony and documentary evidence, the Board of Supervisors finds and declares that the health, safety, and well-being of San Francisco's communities depend on increasing access to employment and housing opportunities for people with arrest or conviction records in order for them to effectively reintegrate into the community and provide for their families and themselves. Barriers to these opportunities for people with arrest or conviction records increase recidivism and thereby jeopardize the safety of the public, disrupt the financial and overall stability of affected families and of our communities, and impede the City's achieving its maximum potential of economic growth. Further, establishing procedures for the lawful use of criminal history information in employment and housing decisions can assist employers and housing providers by preventing the automatic exclusion of individuals who may be qualified, and in some cases well-qualified, employees or tenants. In San Francisco, as across the country, individuals are often plagued by old or minor arrest or conviction records that discourage them from applying for jobs or housing because a "box" on the application requires disclosure of criminal history information that likely will automatically exclude them from consideration. Precise statistics in this area are difficult to come by, but by any measure the problem is major, affecting a large number of individuals and families. By one measure, some sixty-five million Americans have a criminal record that may show up on a routine background check report. In California, it has been estimated that almost one in four adults have arrest or conviction records. Many thousands of people in our local community are directly impacted by barriers to reintegration based on these records. In today's digital age, there has been widespread proliferation in the use of criminal background checks, with hundreds of companies offering over the internet low-cost criminal background checks. Surveys have shown that as many as ninety percent of employers and eighty percent of private housing providers conduct background checks. And the information that such background checks may yield can have a devastating impact on the employment and housing opportunities of persons with a criminal history, with damaging spillover effects on families and communities. One study found that two-thirds of employers surveyed in five major U.S. cities would not knowingly hire a person with a criminal record, regardless of the offense. Another study found that a criminal record reduces the likelihood of a job callback or offer by nearly fifty percent. Among those seeking assistance from the San Francisco Public Defender's Clean Slate program, a pool of individuals with a criminal record, only about one-third are employed, and the majority of those employed earn an annual income of $3,000 or less. The problems presented by employers and housing providers who use a person's criminal history to deny that person employment or housing opportunities are growing rather than diminishing. In response to this challenge, more than fifty cities and counties in the United States have adopted policies that to one degree or another regulate the inquiry into an individual's criminal history, at least as to individuals employed by those localities. Eleven of those localities apply their policies to those who contract with them. The cities of Philadelphia, Newark, Seattle, and Buffalo have applied their policies to all private employers within their boundaries. At the state level, ten states have adopted policies to address this challenge and four states – Hawaii, Massachusetts, Minnesota and Rhode Island – have applied their policies to private employers. The economic rationale often cited for these reforms is to maximize the pool of talented, qualified workers for employers and to fully utilize the productive capacity of people with prior arrests or convictions, for the improvement of the economy. Regulating inquiries into an individual's criminal history is gaining traction as one facet of the nationwide effort to reduce the recidivism that leads to serial incarceration. A major rationale for this movement is the growing awareness that incarceration has devastating socioeconomic consequences. Researchers have found that more incarceration has the perverse effect of increasing the crime rate in some communities. Children suffer academically and socially, and have decreased economic mobility, after the incarceration of a parent. Incarceration is also linked to homelessness, impacting public health and safety. Twenty-six percent of homeless people surveyed in San Francisco had been incarcerated within the previous twelve months, and an estimated thirty to fifty percent of parolees in San Francisco are homeless. On October 1, 2011, San Francisco and the rest of California implemented AB 109, a "Realignment" of California's criminal justice system, which seeks to produce budgetary savings by reducing recidivism and promoting rehabilitation. As stated by Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr. in signing AB 109, cycling people through the revolving door of "state prisons wastes money, aggravates crowded conditions, thwarts rehabilitation, and impedes local law enforcement supervision." Added by AB 109, Section 3451 of the California Penal Code states that counties must focus on alternatives to incarceration that have a proven track record of reducing recidivism. Moreover, Section 17.5 of the Penal Code states that criminal justice policies that rely on building and operating more prisons to address community safety concerns are not sustainable, and

law enforcement supervision." Added by AB 109, Section 3451 of the California Penal Code states that counties must focus on alternatives to incarceration that have a proven track record of reducing recidivism. Moreover, Section 17.5 of the Penal Code states that criminal justice policies that rely on building and operating more prisons to address community safety concerns are not sustainable, and will not result in improved public safety. Removing unnecessary obstacles to employment and housing that impede reintegration and rehabilitation supports the goals for "Realignment." Lack of employment and housing are significant causes of recidivism; people who are employed and have stable housing are significantly less likely to be re-arrested. For example, one study of 1,600 individuals recently released from prison in Illinois found that only eight percent of those who were employed for a year committed another crime, compared to the state's average recidivism rate of fifty-four percent. In another study, researchers found that from 1992 to 1997, the slightly more than forty percent of the decline in the overall property crime rate could be attributed to the thirty-three percent decline in the unemployment rate during the same period. Still another study in New York reported that a person without stable housing was seven times more likely to re-offend after returning from prison. There is little doubt that a policy designed to improve the employment and housing prospects of persons with arrest or conviction history will enhance their prospects for becoming productive members of the community, and thereby benefitting all of us. Policies that encourage reintegration and reduce recidivism can also help reduce criminal justice costs. The Legislative Analyst Office estimated that in 2005-2006, counties in California spent on average about $28,000 per year to incarcerate an adult in jail and about $1,250

per year to supervise an adult on probation in the community. One study estimated that in terms of court, prosecution, and law enforcement costs, the County spends an average of $16,379 to process a person who has committed a drug offense through the criminal justice system. When a person successfully reintegrates and does not return to the criminal justice system, these costs are avoided, allowing scarce public dollars to be reinvested in programs that make our communities stronger and safer. Not only is it a matter of public safety to ensure that workers have job and housing opportunities, but it is also critical for a stable economy. Economists at the Center for Economic and Policy Research used Bureau of Justice Statistics data to estimate that in 2008, the United States had between 12 and 14 million formerly incarcerated people and people with felonies of working age. Citing this population's greatly reduced job prospects, the researchers estimated that the total male employment that year was reduced by 1.5 to 1.7 percentage points and that the cost to the U.S. economy was between $57 and $65 billion in lost output. The expansion of the criminal justice system and all of its attendant consequences described herein, coupled with the growth of the for- profit criminal background check industry, has created a need for local regulations on the use of arrest and conviction records. On March 29, 2011, the Reentry Council of the City & County of San Francisco, chaired by the Chief Adult Probation Officer, and comprised of that official and the District Attorney, Mayor, Public Defender, and Sheriff urged the enactment of an ordinance to reduce unnecessary barriers to housing and employment for individuals based on arrest or conviction records. This Article is an important part of implementing that general recommendation. Between the time that this Article was first adopted and 2026, reproductive rights and LGBTQ+ rights have come under attack in an unprecedented manner across the nation. In many states, activities that are typically considered basic human rights are being criminalized, including gender affirming care, drag performances, and reproductive healthcare, particularly abortion and miscarriage care. In 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org., 597 U.S. 215, ended fifty years of federal protection for privacy rights, reproductive freedom, and access to abortion. The result is a patchwork of regressive and harmful state legislation across the country, including bans on abortion without exceptions for rape, incest, or the health of a birthing person, and restrictions on access to contraception. Often the state penal codes used for these charges imply that these activities are criminalized to protect health and safety, when they in fact penalize access to life saving healthcare and self-expression. As of May 2026, 13 states have criminalized abortion and abortion-related healthcare, with several states targeting individuals and healthcare providers performing care with serious criminal penalties. Additionally, 27 states have imposed limitations on gender affirming care, of which 24 states impose various civil, criminal, and/or professional licensing penalties on individuals, including physicians, other healthcare providers, and parents of transgender youth seeking or receiving this care. Two states explicitly ban drag performances if minors are present, and another four states have enacted laws regarding drag performances, such as by limiting them from taking place in public or using public funding. As individuals targeted by these draconian laws seek refuge in other states – such as California – the criminalization of these activities and the convictions that result could lead to unjust denials for affordable housing or employment in San Francisco. Thus, this Article ensures that no one living in San Francisco is adversely impacted while seeking affordable housing or employment due to cruel or discriminatory laws in other states. This Article does not intend, and shall not be construed, to require an employer to give preference to anyone or to hire an unqualified person with an arrest or conviction record. Nor does it require a housing provider to give preference to anyone or to rent to an unqualified tenant with an arrest or conviction record. Moreover, this Article shall not be construed to limit an employer or a housing provider’s ability to choose the most qualified and appropriate candidate from applicants for employment or housing. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014 ; amended by Ord. 128-26, File No. 260540, App. 7/10/2026, Eff. 8/10/2026) (Former Sec. 4902 added by Ord. 176-13, File No. 130661, App. 7/31/2013, Eff. 8/30/2013; expired 9/30/2013) (Former Sec. 4902 added by Ord. 61-01, File No. 002197, App. 4/20/2001; repealed by Ord. 234-06, File No. 060892, App. 9/14/2006) SEC. 4903. DEFINITIONS. For the purposes of this Article 49, the following words and phrases shall mean and include: “Abortion-Related Healthcare Conviction” shall mean an out-of-state Conviction or Unresolved Arrest for conduct that is lawful under California law, and has the primary aim of seeking, performing, providing, receiving, or facilitating the services by or of a physician or other medical professional to terminate a pregnancy. "Adverse Action" in the context of employment shall mean to fail or refuse to hire, to discharge, or to not promote any individual; or to limit, segregate or classify employees in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities, or otherwise adversely affect his/her status as an employee. The "Adverse Action" must relate to employment in whole or substantial part in the City. "Adverse Action" in the context of housing shall mean to evict from, fail or refuse to rent or lease real property to an individual, or fail or refuse

oyees in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities, or otherwise adversely affect his/her status as an employee. The "Adverse Action" must relate to employment in whole or substantial part in the City. "Adverse Action" in the context of housing shall mean to evict from, fail or refuse to rent or lease real property to an individual, or fail or refuse to continue to rent or lease real property to an individual, or fail or refuse to add a household member to an existing lease, or to reduce any tenant subsidy. The "Adverse Action" must relate to real property in the City. "Affordable Housing" means any residential building in the City that has received funding from the City, connected in whole or in part to restricting rents, the funding being provided either directly or indirectly through funding to another entity that owns, master leases, or develops the building. Affordable Housing also includes "affordable units" in the City as that term is defined in Article 4 of the Planning Code. Projects that are financed using City-issued tax exempt bonds but that receive no other funding from the City or are not otherwise restricted by the City shall not constitute Affordable Housing. "Arrest" shall mean a record from any jurisdiction that does not result in a conviction and includes information indicating that a person has been questioned apprehended taken into custody or detained, or held for investigation, by a law enforcement, police, or prosecutorial agency

and/or charged with, indicted, or tried and acquitted for any felony, misdemeanor or other criminal offense. "Arrest" is a term that is separate and distinct from, and that does not include, "Unresolved Arrest." "Background Check Report" shall mean any criminal history report, including but not limited to those produced by the California Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, other law enforcement or police agencies, or courts, or by any consumer reporting agency or business, employment screening agency or business, or tenant screening agency or business. "City" shall mean the City and County of San Francisco. "Conviction" shall mean a record from any jurisdiction that includes information indicating that a person has been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor; provided that the conviction is one for which the person has been placed on probation, fined, imprisoned, or paroled. Those matters identified in Section 4904(a) and/or Section 4906(a) about which an Employer and/or Housing Provider may not inquire and as to which they may not base an Adverse Action, are not considered "Convictions." "Conviction History" shall mean information regarding one or more Convictions or Unresolved Arrests, transmitted orally or in writing or by any other means, and obtained from any source, including but not limited to the individual to whom the information pertains and a Background Check Report. “Directly-Related Conviction” in the employment context shall mean that the conduct for which a person was convicted or that is the subject of an Unresolved Arrest has a direct and specific negative bearing on that person’s ability to perform the duties or responsibilities necessarily related to the employment position. In determining whether the conviction or Unresolved Arrest is directly related to the employment position, the Employer shall consider the nature and gravity of the offense, whether the employment position offers the opportunity for the same or a similar offense to occur, and whether circumstances leading to the conduct for which the person was convicted or that is the subject of an Unresolved Arrest will recur in the employment position. “Directly-Related Conviction” in the housing context shall mean that the conduct for which a person was convicted or that is the subject of an Unresolved Arrest has a direct and specific negative bearing on the safety of persons or property, given the nature of the housing. In determining whether the conviction or Unresolved Arrest is directly related to the housing, the Housing Provider shall consider the nature and gravity of the offense, whether the housing offers the opportunity for the same or a similar offense to occur and whether circumstances leading to the conduct for which the person was convicted will recur in the housing, and whether supportive services that might reduce the likelihood of a recurrence of such conduct are available on- site. Those matters identified in Sections 4904(a) and/or Sections 4906(a) about which an Employer and/or Housing Provider may not inquire and as to which they may not base an Adverse Action may not qualify as “Directly-Related Convictions.” A Conviction or Unresolved Arrest that the record of conviction and/or additional information submitted by an applicant or employee demonstrates is an Abortion-Related Healthcare Conviction, a Drag Conviction, a Gender Affirming Care Conviction, and/or a Spontaneous Abortion-Related Conviction shall not be a “Directly-Related Conviction.” “Drag-Related Conviction” shall mean an out-of-state Conviction or Unresolved Arrest for conduct that is lawful under California law and that is related to a public, artistic performance characterized by exaggerated displays of femininity or masculinity, in some instances demonstrated by wearing clothing associated with a different gender than the person’s assigned gender at birth. “Employer” shall mean any individual, firm, corporation, partnership, labor organization, group of persons, association, or other organization however organized, that is located or doing business in the City, and that employs five or more persons regardless of location, including the owner or owners and management and supervisorial employees. “Employer” includes job placement and referral agencies and other employment agencies. “Employer” does not include the City and County of San Francisco, any other local governmental unit, or any unit of the state government or the federal government. “Employment” shall mean any occupation, vocation, job, or work, including but not limited to temporary or seasonal work, part-time work, contracted work, contingent work, work on commission, and work through the services of a temporary or other employment agency, or any form of vocational or educational training with or without pay. The physical location of the employment or prospective employment of an individual as to whom Section 4904 applies must be at least eight hours per week within the City. "Evidence of Rehabilitation or Other Mitigating Factors" may include but is not limited to a person's satisfactory compliance with all terms and conditions of parole and/or probation (however, inability to pay fines, fees, and restitution due to indigence shall not be considered noncompliance with terms and conditions of parole and/or probation); employer recommendations, especially concerning a person's post- conviction employment; educational attainment or vocational or professional training since the conviction, including training received while incarcerated; completion of or active participation in rehabilitative treatment (e.g., alcohol or drug treatment); letters of recommendation from community organizations, counselors or case managers, teachers, community leaders, or parole/probation officers who have observed the person since his or her conviction; and age of the person at the time of the conviction. Examples of mitigating factors that

rcerated; completion of or active participation in rehabilitative treatment (e.g., alcohol or drug treatment); letters of recommendation from community organizations, counselors or case managers, teachers, community leaders, or parole/probation officers who have observed the person since his or her conviction; and age of the person at the time of the conviction. Examples of mitigating factors that are offered voluntarily by the person may include but are not limited to explanation of the precedent coercive conditions, intimate physical or emotional abuse, or untreated substance abuse or mental illness that contributed to the conviction. “Gender Affirming Care Conviction” shall mean an out-of-state Conviction or Unresolved Arrest for conduct that is lawful under California law, and that is related to seeking, performing, providing, receiving, or facilitating medical care, support, or advocacy for the purpose of addressing disparities between any person’s gender identity and their physiology or perceived gender identity, including but not limited to hormone replacement therapy, surgical procedures, and changes to a person’s name or gender marker. This includes a Conviction for use of a gendered facility that corresponds with one’s gender identity and/or playing sports on a team that corresponds with one’s gender identity. "Housing Provider" shall mean an entity that owns, master leases, or develops Affordable Housing in the City. "Housing Provider" also includes owners and developers of below market rate housing in the City or "affordable units," as that term is defined in Article 4 of the Planning Code, in the City. Any agent, such as a property management company, that makes tenancy decisions on behalf of the above described entities shall also be considered a Housing Provider. "HRC" shall mean the Human Rights Commission or any successor department or office. The "Director" of HRC shall mean the department head of the HRC.

"Inquire" shall mean any direct or indirect conduct intended to gather information from or about an applicant, candidate, potential applicant or candidate, or employee, using any mode of communication, including but not limited to application forms, interviews, and Background Check Reports. "OLSE" shall mean the Office of Labor Standards Enforcement or any successor department or office. The "Director" of OLSE shall mean the head of the OLSE. "Person" shall mean any individual, person, firm, corporation, business or other organization or group of persons however organized. “Spontaneous Abortion-Related Conviction” shall mean an out-of-state Conviction or Unresolved Arrest for conduct that is lawful under California law, and is related to actions taken by a person regarding their own noninduced pregnancy loss before 20 weeks of pregnancy, also known as a miscarriage, or seeking, performing, providing, receiving, or facilitating the services by or of a physician or other medical professional related to such type of pregnancy loss. This includes a Conviction for conduct related to a stillbirth, which is pregnancy loss after 20 weeks of pregnancy. "Unresolved Arrest" shall mean an Arrest that is undergoing an active pending criminal investigation or trial that has not yet been resolved. An Arrest has been resolved if the arrestee was released and no accusatory pleading was filed charging him or her with an offense, or if the charges have been dismissed or discharged by the district attorney or the court. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014; amended by Ord. 249-14 , File No. 140878, App. 12/17/2014, Eff. 1/16/2015; Ord. 54-18, File No. 171170, App. 4/13/2018, Eff. 5/14/2018, Oper. 10/1/2018; amended by Ord. 128-26, File No. 260540, App. 7/10/2026, Eff. 8/10/2026) (Former Sec. 4903 added by Ord. 176-13, File No. 130661, App. 7/31/2013, Eff. 8/30/2013; expired 9/30/2013) (Former Sec. 4903 added by Ord. 61-01, File No. 002197, App. 4/20/2001; amended by Ord. 187-04, File No. 040759, App. 7/22/2004; repealed by Ord. 234-06, File No. 060892, App. 9/14/2006) SEC. 4904. PROCEDURES FOR USE OF CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION IN EMPLOYMENT DECISIONS. (a) Regarding applicants or potential applicants for employment, or employees, an Employer shall not, at any time or by any means, inquire about, require disclosure of, or if such information is received base an Adverse Action in whole or in part on: (1) An Arrest not leading to a Conviction, excepting under circumstances identified in this Section an Unresolved Arrest; (2) Participation in or completion of a diversion or a deferral of judgment program; (3) A Conviction that has been judicially dismissed, expunged, voided, invalidated, or otherwise rendered inoperative, by way of example but not limitation, under California Penal Code Sections 1203.4, 1203.4a, or 1203.41; (4) A Conviction or any other determination or adjudication in the juvenile justice system, or information regarding a matter considered in or processed through the juvenile justice system; (5) A Conviction that is more than seven years old, the date of Conviction being the date of sentencing, except that this restriction and any limitations imposed in this Article 49 based on the limitation in this subsection (a)(5) shall not apply where the applicant or employee is or will be (A) providing services to or have supervisory or disciplinary authority over a minor, (B) providing services to or have supervisory or disciplinary authority over a “dependent adult,” as that phrase is defined in California Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15610.23 or any successor state law, or (C) providing support services or care to or has supervisory authority over a person 65 years or older; (6) Information pertaining to an offense other than a felony or misdemeanor, such as an infraction, except that an Employer may inquire about, require disclosure of, base an Adverse Action on, or otherwise consider an infraction or infractions contained in an applicant or employee’s driving record if driving is more than a de minimis element of the employment in question; or (7) A Conviction that arises out of conduct that has been decriminalized since the date of the Conviction, the date of the Conviction being the date of sentencing. Examples of statutes that have decriminalized particular conduct include but are not limited to California Health and Safety Code Sections 11362.1 and 11362.2. Accordingly, the matters identified in this subsection (a) may not be considered in any manner by the Employer. (b) The Employer shall not require applicants or potential applicants for employment or employees to disclose on any employment application the fact or details of any Conviction History, any Unresolved Arrest, or any matter identified in subsections (a)(1)-(7). Nor shall the Employer inquire on any employment application about the fact or details of any Conviction History, any Unresolved Arrest, or any matter identified in subsections (a)(1)-(7). An Employer may ask on an employment application for an applicant, potential applicant, or employee’s written consent for a Background Check so long as the application includes a clear and conspicuous statement that the Employer will not itself conduct or obtain from a third party the Background Check until after a conditional offer of employment in accordance with subsection (c) of this Section 4904. (c) The Employer shall not require applicants or potential applicants for employment, or employees, to disclose, and shall not inquire into or discuss, their Conviction History or an Unresolved Arrest until after a conditional offer of employment. The Employer may not itself conduct or obtain from a third party a Background Check until after a conditional offer of employment. (d) Prior to any Conviction History inquiry, the Employer shall

potential applicants for employment, or employees, to disclose, and shall not inquire into or discuss, their Conviction History or an Unresolved Arrest until after a conditional offer of employment. The Employer may not itself conduct or obtain from a third party a Background Check until after a conditional offer of employment. (d) Prior to any Conviction History inquiry, the Employer shall provide a copy of the notice described in Section 4905(b) to the applicant or employee.

(e) Prior to obtaining a copy of a Background Check Report, the Employer shall comply with all state and federal requirements including but not limited to those in the California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (ICRAA), California Civil Code sections 1786 et seq., and the Federal Consumer Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 United States Code sections 1681 et seq., to provide notice to the applicant or employee that such a report is being sought. (f) In making an employment decision based on an applicant's or employee's Conviction History, an Employer shall conduct an individualized assessment, considering only Directly-Related Convictions, the time that has elapsed since the Conviction or Unresolved Arrest, and any evidence of inaccuracy or Evidence of Rehabilitation or Other Mitigating Factors. (g) If an Employer intends to base an Adverse Action on an item or items in the applicant’s or employee’s Conviction History, prior to taking any Adverse Action the Employer shall provide the applicant or employee with a copy of the Background Check Report, if any, and shall notify the applicant or employee of the prospective Adverse Action and the items forming the basis for the prospective Adverse Action. (h) If, within seven days of the date that the notice described in subsection (g) is provided by the Employer to the applicant or employee, the applicant or employee gives the Employer notice, orally or in writing, of evidence of the inaccuracy of the item or items of Conviction History or any Evidence of Rehabilitation or Other Mitigating Factors, the Employer shall provide a response confirming receipt of the notice from the applicant or employee within 14 days, shall delay any Adverse Action for a reasonable period after providing a response to confirm receipt of the information and during that time shall reconsider the prospective Adverse Action in light of the information. If, in the notice given to the Employer by the applicant or employee, the applicant or employee makes a reasonable factual showing that the proposed Adverse Action is based solely on a conviction that is not a Directly-Related Conviction, the Employer must withdraw the Adverse Action. (i) Upon taking any final Adverse Action based upon the Conviction History of an applicant or employee, an Employer shall notify the applicant or employee of the final Adverse Action within 30 days of receipt of notice received from applicant or employee in (h) or, if the applicant or employee does not provide notice contemplated by (h), within 30 days of the notice provided by the Employer in (g). (j) It shall be unlawful for any Employer to engage in any communication that is intended and reasonably likely to reach persons who are reasonably likely to seek employment in the City, and that expresses, directly or indirectly, that any person with an Arrest or Conviction will not be considered for employment or may not apply for employment. For purposes of this subsection (j), engaging in a communication includes but is not limited to making a verbal statement or producing or disseminating any solicitation, advertisement, or signage. (k) Nothing in this Section 4904 shall be construed to prohibit an Employer from observing the conditions of a seniority system or an employee benefit plan, provided such systems or plans are not a subterfuge to evade the purposes or requirements of this Article. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014; amended by Ord. 249-14 , File No. 140878, App. 12/17/2014, Eff. 1/16/2015; Ord. 54-18, File No. 171170, App. 4/13/2018, Eff. 5/14/2018, Oper. 10/1/2018; amended by Ord. 128-26, File No. 260540, App. 7/10/2026, Eff. 8/10/2026) (Former Sec. 4904 added by Ord. 176-13, File No. 130661, App. 7/31/2013, Eff. 8/30/2013; expired 9/30/2013) (Former Sec. 4904 added by Ord. 61-01, File No. 002197, App. 4/20/2001; amended by Ord. 187-04, File No. 040759, App. 7/22/2004; repealed by Ord. 234-06, File No. 060892, App. 9/14/2006) SEC. 4905. NOTICE AND POSTING REQUIREMENTS FOR EMPLOYERS. (a) The Employer shall state in all solicitations or advertisements for employees that are reasonably likely to reach persons who are reasonably likely to seek employment in the City, that the Employer will consider for employment qualified applicants with criminal histories in a manner consistent with the requirements of this Article 49. (b) The OLSE shall, by the operative date of this Article 49, publish and make available to Employers, in English, Spanish, Chinese, and all languages spoken by more than 5% of the San Francisco workforce, a notice suitable for posting by Employers in the workplace informing applicants and employees of their rights under this Article 49. The OLSE shall update this notice on December 1 of any year in which there is a change in the languages spoken by more than 5% of the San Francisco workforce. (c) Employers shall post the notice described in subsection (b) in a conspicuous place at every workplace, job site, or other location in San Fran- cisco under the Employer’s control frequently visited by their employees or applicants, and shall send a copy of this notice to each labor union or representative of workers with which they have a collective bargaining agreement or other agree- ment or understanding, that is applicable to em- ployees in San Francisco. The notice shall be posted in English, Spanish, Chinese, and any lan- guage spoken by at least 5% of the employees at the workplace, job site, or other location at which it is posted. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014 ; amended by Ord. 187-19, File No. 190479, App. 8/9/2019, Eff. 9/9/2019, Oper. 9/9/2019) (Former Sec. 4905 added by Ord. 176-13, File No. 130661, App. 7/31/2013, Eff. 8/30/2013; expired 9/30/2013) (Former Sec. 4905 added by Ord. 61-01, File No. 002197, App. 4/20/2001; amended by Ord. 187-04, File No

is posted. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014 ; amended by Ord. 187-19, File No. 190479, App. 8/9/2019, Eff. 9/9/2019, Oper. 9/9/2019) (Former Sec. 4905 added by Ord. 176-13, File No. 130661, App. 7/31/2013, Eff. 8/30/2013; expired 9/30/2013) (Former Sec. 4905 added by Ord. 61-01, File No. 002197, App. 4/20/2001; amended by Ord. 187-04, File No. 040759, App. 7/22/2004; repealed by Ord. 234-06, File No. 060892, App. 9/14/2006) SEC. 4906. PROCEDURES FOR USE OF CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION IN HOUSING DECISIONS.

(a) Regarding applicants or potential applicants for Affordable Housing, and their household members, a Housing Provider shall not, at any time or by any means, inquire about, require disclosure of, or if such information is received base an Adverse Action in whole or in part on: (1) An Arrest not leading to a Conviction, excepting under circumstances identified in this Section an Unresolved Arrest; (2) Participation in or completion of a diversion or a deferral of judgment program; (3) A Conviction that has been judicially dismissed, expunged, voided, invalidated, or otherwise rendered inoperative, by way of example but not limitation, under California Penal Code sections 1203.4, 1203.4a, or 1203.41; (4) A Conviction or any other determination or adjudication in the juvenile justice system, or information regarding a matter considered in or processed through the juvenile justice system; (5) A Conviction that is more than seven years old, the date of Conviction being the date of sentencing; (6) Information pertaining to an offense other than a felony or misdemeanor, such as an infraction 1 (7) A Conviction that arises out of conduct that has been decriminalized since the date of the Conviction, the date of the Conviction being the date of sentencing. Examples of statutes that have decriminalized particular conduct include but are not limited to California Health and Safety Code Sections 11362.1 and 11362.2. Accordingly, the matters identified in this subsection (a) may not be considered in any manner by the Housing Provider. (b) The Housing Provider shall not require applicants for Affordable Housing to disclose on any housing application the fact or details of any Conviction History, any Unresolved Arrest, or any matter identified in subsections (a)(1)-(7). Nor shall the Housing Provider inquire on any housing application about the fact or details of any Conviction History, any Unresolved Arrest, or any matter identified in subsections (a)(1)-(7). (c) The Housing Provider shall not require applicants for Affordable Housing to disclose, and shall not inquire into, Conviction History until the Housing Provider has first determined: (1) that the applicant is legally eligible to rent the housing unit; and (2) that the applicant is qualified to rent the housing unit under the Housing Provider's criteria for assessing rental history and credit history; provided, however, that this subsection (c)(2) shall apply only if the Housing Provider uses rental history and credit history information in determining qualifications of applicants for housing; and provided further, that this subsection (c)(2) shall not preclude a Housing Provider from obtaining a Background Check Report at the same time as the Housing Provider obtains the rental history report and credit history report for an applicant, so long as the Housing Provider reviews the Background Check Report only after determining based on rental history and credit history that the applicant is qualified to rent the housing unit. (d) Prior to any Conviction History inquiry, the Housing Provider shall provide a copy of the notice described in Sections 4907(b) and (c) to the applicant. (e) Prior to obtaining a copy of a Background Check Report, the Housing Provider shall comply with all state and federal requirements including but not limited to those in the California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (ICRAA). California Civil Code sections 1786 et seq., and the Federal Consumer Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 United States Code sections 1681 et seq., to provide notice to the applicant that such a report is being sought. (f) In making a decision related to Affordable Housing based on Conviction History, a Housing Provider shall conduct an individualized assessment, considering only Directly-Related Convictions, the time that has elapsed since the Conviction or Unresolved Arrest, and any evidence of inaccuracy or Evidence of Rehabilitation or Other Mitigating Factors. (g) If a Housing Provider intends to base an Adverse Action related to Affordable Housing on an item or items in the applicant's Conviction History, prior to taking any Adverse Action the Housing Provider shall provide the applicant with a copy of the Background Check Report, and shall notify the applicant of the prospective Adverse Action and the items forming the basis for the prospective Adverse Action. (h) If, within 14 days of the date that the notice described in subsection (g) is provided by the Housing Provider to the applicant, the applicant gives the Housing Provider notice, orally or in writing, of evidence of the inaccuracy of the item or items of Conviction History and/or Evidence of Rehabilitation or Other Mitigating Factors, the Housing Provider shall provide a response confirming receipt of the notice from the applicant within 14 days, shall delay any Adverse Action for a reasonable period after providing a response to confirm receipt of the information and during that time shall reconsider the prospective Adverse Action in light of the information. If, in the notice given to the Housing Provider by the applicant, the applicant makes a reasonable factual showing that the proposed Adverse Action is based solely on a conviction that is not a Directly-Related Conviction, the Housing Provider must withdraw the Adverse Action. (i) Upon taking any final Adverse Action based upon the Conviction History of an applicant, the Housing Provider shall notify the applicant of the final Adverse Action within 30 days of receipt of notice received from applicant in (h), or, if the applicant does not provide notice contemplated by (h), within 30 days of the notice provided by the Housing Provider in (g). (j) It shall be unlawful for any Housing Provider to engage in any communication related to Affordable Housing that expresses, directly or indirectly, that a

icant of the final Adverse Action within 30 days of receipt of notice received from applicant in (h), or, if the applicant does not provide notice contemplated by (h), within 30 days of the notice provided by the Housing Provider in (g). (j) It shall be unlawful for any Housing Provider to engage in any communication related to Affordable Housing that expresses, directly or indirectly, that any person with an arrest or conviction record will not be considered for the rental or lease of real property or may not apply for the rental or lease of real property, except as required by local, state, or federal law. For purposes of this subsection (j), engaging in a communication includes but is not limited to making a verbal statement or producing or disseminating any solicitation, advertisement, or signage. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014; amended by Ord. 249-14 , File No. 140878, App. 12/17/2014, Eff. 1/16/2015; Ord. 54-18, File No. 171170, App. 4/13/2018, Eff. 5/14/2018, Oper. 10/1/2018; amended by Ord. 128-26, File No. 260540, App. 7/10/2026, Eff. 8/10/2026)

(Former Sec. 4906 added by Ord. 61-01, File No. 002197, App. 4/20/2001; repealed by Ord. 234-06, File No. 060892, App. 9/14/2006) CODIFICATION NOTE

1. So in Ord. 54-18. SEC. 4907. NOTICE AND POSTING REQUIREMENTS FOR HOUSING PROVIDERS. (a) The Housing Provider shall state in all solicitations or advertisements for the rental or lease of Affordable Housing placed by the Housing Provider or on behalf of the Housing Provider, that the Housing Provider will consider for tenancy qualified applicants with criminal histories in a manner consistent with the requirements of this Article. (b) The HRC shall, by the operative date of this Article, publish and make available to Housing Providers, in English, Spanish, and Chinese, and all languages spoken by more than 5% of the San Francisco population, a notice suitable for posting that informs applicants for Affordable Housing of their rights under this Article. The HRC shall update this notice on December 1 of any year in which there is a change in the languages spoken by more than 5% of the San Francisco population. (c) Housing Providers shall post the notice prominently on their website and at any location under their control that is frequently visited by applicants or potential applicants for the rental or lease of Affordable Housing in San Francisco. At a minimum the notice described above shall contain the following information: (1) A description of those matters identified in Section 4906(a) that may not be considered by the Housing Provider under any circumstances; (2) A description of the restrictions and requirements that Section 4906 imposes on Housing Providers when inquiring about Conviction History in connection with an application for the rental or lease of Affordable Housing in San Francisco; (3) The definition of Evidence of Rehabilitation and Other Mitigating Factors provided in Section 4903, and circumstances and timeline under which the applicant or potential applicant has a right to provide such evidence as provided in Section 4906(h); and (4) The HRC telephone number and email address the applicant or potential applicant may use to make a report if he or she believes the Housing Provider has violated any of the provisions of Article 49. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014) (Former Sec. 4907 added by Ord. 61-01, File No. 002197, App. 4/20/2001; repealed by Ord. 234-06, File No. 060892, App. 9/14/2006) SEC. 4908. EXERCISE OF RIGHTS PROTECTED; RETALIATION PROHIBITED. (a) It shall be unlawful for an Employer, Housing Provider, or any other person to interfere with, restrain, or deny the exercise of, or the attempt to exercise, any right protected under this Article. (b) It shall be unlawful for an Employer to refuse to hire an applicant, or to discharge, threaten to discharge, demote, suspend or otherwise take Adverse Action against an employee in retaliation for exercising rights protected under this Article. Such rights include but are not limited to: (1) the right to file a complaint or inform any person about any Employer's alleged violation of this Article; (2) the right to inform any person about an Employer's alleged violation of this Article; (3) the right to cooperate with the OLSE or other persons in the investigation or prosecution of any alleged violation of this Article; (4) the right to oppose any policy, practice, or act that is unlawful under this Article; or (5) the right to inform any person of his or her rights under this Article. (c) It shall be unlawful for a Housing Provider to interrupt, terminate, or fail or refuse to initiate or conduct a transaction involving the rental or lease of residential real property, including falsely representing that a residential unit is not available for rental or lease, or otherwise take Adverse Action against a person in retaliation for exercising rights protected under this Article. Such rights include but are not limited to: (1) the right to file a complaint or inform any person about any Housing Provider's alleged violation of this Article; (2) the right to inform any person about a Housing Provider's alleged violation of this Article; (3) the right to cooperate with the HRC or other persons in the investigation or prosecution of any alleged violation of this Article; (4) the right to oppose any policy, practice, or act that is unlawful under this Article; or (5) the right to inform any person of his or her rights under this Article. (d) Protections of this Section 4908 shall apply to any person who mistakenly but in good faith alleges violations of this Article.

(e) Taking Adverse Action against a person within 90 days of the exercise of one or more of the rights described in this Section 4908 shall create a rebuttable presumption that such Adverse Action was taken in retaliation for the exercise of those rights. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014) (Former Sec. 4908 added by Ord. 61-01, File No. 002197, App. 4/20/2001; amended by Ord. 187-04, File No. 040759, App. 7/22/2004; repealed by Ord. 234-06, File No. 060892, App. 9/14/2006) SEC. 4909. IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT PROVISIONS. (a) Administrative Enforcement. (1) With regard to the employment provisions of this Article 49, the OLSE is authorized to take appropriate steps to enforce this Article and coordinate enforcement, including the investigation of any possible violations of this Article. Where the OLSE has reason to believe that a violation has occurred, it may order any appropriate temporary or interim relief to mitigate the violation or maintain the status quo pending completion of a full investigation or hearing. The OLSE may find a violation of this Article based on a finding that an Employer failed to conduct the individualized assessment as required under Section 4904(f) or that an Employer issued an Adverse Decision based in whole or in part on an employee or applicant’s Abortion-Related Healthcare Conviction, Drag Conviction, Gender Affirming Care Conviction, or Spontaneous Abortion-Related Conviction as prohibited by Section 4904(f)..1 The OLSE shall not find a violation based on an Employer’s determination that an applicant or employee’s Conviction, other than an Abortion-Related Healthcare Conviction, Drag Conviction, Gender Affirming Care Conviction, or Spontaneous Abortion-Related Conviction, is a Directly-Related Conviction. (2) If multiple employees or applicants are impacted by the same procedural violation at the same time (e.g. all applicants for a certain job opening are asked for their Conviction History on the initial application), the violation shall be treated as a single violation rather than multiple violations. (3) Where prompt compliance is not forthcoming, the OLSE may refer the action to the City Attorney to consider initiating a civil action pursuant to Subsection (b). (4) Where the OLSE determines that a violation has occurred, it may issue a determination and order any appropriate relief. If multiple employees or applicants are impacted by the same procedural violation at the same time (e.g., all applicants for a certain job opening are asked for their Conviction History on the initial application), the violation shall be treated as one violation for each impacted employee or applicant. (5) For a first violation, the OLSE may impose an administrative penalty of no more than $1,000 for each employee or applicant as to whom the violation occurred or continued. For a second violation, the OLSE may impose an administrative penalty of no more than $2,000 for each employee or applicant as to whom the violation occurred or continued. Thereafter, for subsequent violations, the OLSE may impose an administrative penalty of no more than $4,000 for each employee or applicant whose rights were, or continue to be, violated. The administrative penalties for each violation shall be paid to the employee or applicant as to whom the violation occurred or continued. Notwithstanding the previous sentences in this subsection (a)(5), if multiple employees or applicants are impacted by the same procedural violation at the same time (e.g., all applicants for a certain job opening are asked for their Conviction History on the initial application), the Employer shall be assessed the same administrative penalty for each of the employees or applicants affected by that procedural violation. (6) An employee, applicant or other person may report to the OLSE any suspected violation of this Article 49 within 60 days of the date the suspected violation occurred. The OLSE shall encourage reporting pursuant to this subsection by keeping confidential, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable laws, the name and other identifying information of the employee, applicant or person reporting the violation; provided, however, that with the authorization of such person, the OLSE may disclose their name and identifying information as necessary to enforce this Article or for other appropriate purposes. (7) The Director of the OLSE shall establish rules governing the administrative process for determining and appealing violations of this Article 49. The Rules shall include procedures for: (A) providing the Employer with notice that it may have violated this Article; (B) providing the Employer with a right to respond to the notice; (C) providing the Employer with notice of the OLSE’s determination of a violation; (D) providing the Employer with an opportunity to appeal the OLSE’s determination to a hearing officer, who is appointed by the City Controller or his or her or their designee. (8) If there is no appeal of the OLSE’s determination of a violation, that determination shall constitute a failure to exhaust administrative remedies, which shall serve as a complete defense to any petition or claim brought by the Employer against the City regarding the OLSE’s determination of a violation. (9) If there is an appeal of the OLSE’s determination of a violation, the hearing before the hearing officer shall be conducted in a manner that satisfies the requirements of due process. In any such hearing, the OLSE’s determination of a violation shall be considered prima facie evidence of a violation, and the Employer shall have the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the OLSE’s determination of a violation is incorrect. The hearing officer’s decision of the appeal shall constitute the City’s final

a manner that satisfies the requirements of due process. In any such hearing, the OLSE’s determination of a violation shall be considered prima facie evidence of a violation, and the Employer shall have the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the OLSE’s determination of a violation is incorrect. The hearing officer’s decision of the appeal shall constitute the City’s final decision. The sole means of review of the City’s final decision, rendered by the hearing officer, shall be by filing in the San Francisco Superior Court a petition for writ of mandate under Section 1094.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. The OLSE shall notify the Employer of this right of review after issuance of the City’s final decision by the hearing officer.

(b) Civil Enforcement. The City or any employee or applicant whose rights under this Article 49 have been violated may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction against the Employer or other person violating this Article, and, upon prevailing, shall be entitled to such legal or equitable relief as may be appropriate to remedy the violation including, but not limited to: reinstatement; back pay; the payment of benefits or pay unlawfully withheld; the payment of an additional sum as liquidated damages in the amount of $1,000 to each employee, applicant or other person whose rights under this Article were violated for each day such violation continued or was permitted to continue; appropriate injunctive relief; and, further shall be awarded reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. An employee or applicant may institute a civil action under this subsection (b) only if: (1) The employee or applicant has filed a complaint with the Director of the OLSE; (2) 90 days have passed since the filing of the complaint; (3) After such 90-day period has passed, the employee or applicant provides 30-day written notice to the Director of the OLSE and the City Attorney’s Office of their intent to initiate civil proceedings; and (4) The City Attorney’s Office has not provided notice to the employee or applicant of the City’s intent to initiate civil proceedings by the end of the 30-day period. (c) Interest. In any administrative or civil action brought under this Article, the OLSE or court, as the case may be, shall award interest on all amounts due and unpaid at the rate of interest specified in subdivision (b) of Section 3289 of the California Civil Code. (d) Remedies Cumulative. The remedies, penalties, and procedures provided under this Article are cumulative. (e) Limitation on Actions. Civil Actions to enforce the employment provisions of this Article must be filed within one year after the date of the violation. This limitations period shall not commence until the date the violation was discovered or could reasonably have been discovered. (f) Tracking of Complaints. OLSE shall maintain a record of the number and types of complaints it receives alleging violations of this Article, and the resolution of those complaints. OLSE shall report this information to the Board of Supervisors annually. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014 ; amended by Ord. 54-18, File No. 171170, App. 4/13/2018, Eff. 5/14/2018, Oper. 10/1/2018; amended by Ord. 128-26, File No. 260540, App. 7/10/2026, Eff. 8/10/2026; Ord. 128-26, File No. 260540, App. 7/10/2026, Eff. 8/10/2026) CODIFICATION NOTE

1. So in Ord. 128-26. SEC. 4910. EMPLOYER RECORDS. (a) An Employer shall retain records of employment, application forms, and other pertinent data and records required under this Article, for a period of three years, and shall allow the OLSE access to such records, with appropriate notice and at a mutually agreeable time, to monitor compliance with the requirements of this Article. (b) An Employer shall provide information to the OLSE, or the OLSE’s designee, on an annual basis as may be required to verify the Employer’s compliance with this Article. (c) In no event shall the OLSE require an Employer to provide any information or documents the disclosure of which would violate state or federal law. (d) Where an Employer does not maintain or retain adequate records documenting compliance with this Article or does not allow the OLSE reasonable access to such records, it shall be presumed that the Employer did not comply with this Article, absent clear and convincing evidence otherwise. The Office of Treasurer and Tax Collector shall have the authority to provide any and all nonfinancial information to OLSE necessary to fulfill OLSE's responsibilities as the enforcing agency under this Article. With regard to all such information provided by the Office of Treasurer and Tax Collector, OLSE shall be subject to the confidentiality provisions of Subsection (a) of Section 6.22-1 of the San Francisco Business and Tax Regulations Code. (e) Pursuant to its rulemaking authority under this Article, the OLSE shall adopt rules that establish procedures for Employers to maintain and retain accurate records and to provide annual reporting of compliance to OLSE in a manner that does not require disclosure of any information that would violate State or Federal privacy laws. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014 ; amended by Ord. 62-21, File No. 210218, App. 4/30/2021, Eff. 5/31/2021; Ord. 128-26, File No. 260540, App. 7/10/2026, Eff. 8/10/2026) (Former Sec. 4910 added by Ord. 61-01, File No. 002197, App. 4/20/2001; amended by Ord. 197-03, File No. 030633, App. 8/1/2003; Ord. 187-04, File No. 040759, App. 7/22/2004; repealed by Ord. 234-06, File No. 060892, App. 9/14/2006) SEC. 4911. IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF HOUSING PROVISIONS. (a) Administrative Enforcement. (1) With regard to the housing provisions of this Article 49, the HRC, in consultation with the Mayor’s Office of Housing and

Community Development, is authorized to take appropriate steps to enforce this Article and coordinate enforcement, including the investigation of any possible violations of this Article 49. The HRC may find a violation of this Article based on a finding that a Housing Provider failed to conduct the individualized assessment as required under Section 4906(f) or that a Housing Provider issued an Adverse Decision based in whole or in part on an applicant’s Abortion-Related Healthcare Conviction, Drag Conviction, Gender Affirming Care Conviction, or Spontaneous Abortion-Related Conviction as prohibited by Section 4906(f)..1 The HRC shall not find a violation based on a Housing Provider’s determination that an applicant’s Conviction, other than an Abortion-Related Healthcare Conviction, Drag Conviction, Gender Affirming Care Conviction, or Spontaneous Abortion-Related Conviction, is a Directly-Related Conviction. (2) If multiple applicants are impacted by the same procedural violation at the same time (e.g. all applicants for a certain housing unit are asked for their Conviction History on the initial application), the violation shall be treated as a single violation rather than multiple violations. (3) Where the Director of HRC determines that a violation has occurred, the Director may issue a determination and order any appropriate relief. If multiple applicants are impacted by the same procedural violation at the same time (e.g., all applicants for a certain housing unit are asked for their Conviction History on the initial application), the violation shall be treated as one violation for each impacted applicant. (4) For a first violation, the Director of HRC may impose an administrative penalty of no more than $1,000 for each applicant as to whom the violation occurred or continued. For a second violation, the Director of HRC may impose an administrative penalty of no more than $2,000 for each applicant as to whom the violation occurred or continued. Thereafter, for subsequent violations, the Director of HRC may impose an administrative penalty of no more than $4,000 for each applicant whose rights were, or continue to be, violated. The administrative penalties for each violation shall be paid to the applicant as to whom the violation occurred or continued. Notwithstanding the previous sentences in this subsection (a)(4), if multiple applicants are impacted by the same procedural violation at the same time (e.g., all applicants for a certain housing unit are asked for their Conviction History on the initial application), the Housing Provider shall be assessed the same administrative penalty for each of the applicants affected by that procedural violation. (5) An applicant or other person may report to the HRC any suspected violation of this Article 49 within 60 days of the date the suspected violation occurred. The HRC shall encourage reporting pursuant to this subsection by keeping confidential, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable laws, the name and other identifying information of the employee, applicant or person reporting the violation; provided, however, that with the authorization of such person, the HRC may disclose their name and identifying information as necessary to enforce this Article 49 or for other appropriate purposes. (6) The Director of the HRC, in consultation with the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development, shall establish rules governing the administrative process for determining and appealing violations of this Article 49. The Rules shall include procedures for: (A) providing the Housing Provider with notice that it may have violated this Article 49; (B) providing the Housing Provider with a right to respond to the notice; (C) providing the Housing Provider with notice of the Director’s determination of a violation; (D) providing the Housing Provider with an opportunity to appeal the Director’s determination to the HRC. (7) If there is no appeal of the Director’s determination of a violation, that determination shall constitute a failure to exhaust administrative remedies, which shall serve as a complete defense to any petition or claim brought by the Housing Provider against the City regarding the Director’s determination of a violation. (8) If there is an appeal of the Director’s determination of a violation, the City Controller or the Controller’s designee shall appoint a person, other than a member of the Commission, to serve as a hearing officer. The hearing before the hearing officer shall be conducted in a manner that satisfies the requirements of due process. In any such hearing, the Director’s determination of a violation shall be considered prima facie evidence of a violation, and the Housing Provider shall have the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the Director’s determination of a violation is incorrect. (9) If the hearing officer finds that the Housing Provider has engaged in conduct in violation of this Article 49, the hearing officer shall issue an order requiring the Housing Provider to cease and desist from the practice and to offer the housing accommodation to the applicant or applicants under the terms for which the unit was offered to the public. The Housing Provider shall not be required to offer the housing accommodation if the unit has already been rented or leased to a tenant, but the Housing Provider shall be required to offer a comparable unit, if available, to the applicant or applicants. (10) The decision of the hearing officer shall be final unless the Commission vacates his or her decision on appeal. (11) Either party may file an appeal of the hearing officer’s decision with the Commission. Such an appeal to the Commission from the determination of the hearing officer must be made within 15 days of the mailing of the decision and findings of fact. The appeal shall be

(10) The decision of the hearing officer shall be final unless the Commission vacates his or her decision on appeal. (11) Either party may file an appeal of the hearing officer’s decision with the Commission. Such an appeal to the Commission from the determination of the hearing officer must be made within 15 days of the mailing of the decision and findings of fact. The appeal shall be in writing and must state the grounds for appellant’s claim that there was either error or abuse of discretion on the part of the hearing officer. Each appeal shall be accompanied by a $15 filing fee; provided, however, the fee shall be waived for an individual who files an affidavit under penalty of perjury stating that the individual is an indigent person who does not have and cannot obtain the money to pay the filing fee without using money needed for the necessities of life. The filing of an appeal will not stay the effect of the hearing officer’s decision. (12) Upon receipt of an appeal, the entire administrative record of the matter, including the appeal, shall be filed with the Commission. (13) The Commission may in its discretion determine to hear an appeal. In deciding whether to hear an appeal, the Commission shall consider, among other things, fairness to the parties, hardship to either party and promotion of the policies and purposes of this Article 49. In determining whether to hear an appeal the Commission may also review material from the administrative record of the matter as it deems necessary. A vote of the majority of the Commission shall be required for an appeal to be heard. (14) In those cases where the Commission is able to determine on the basis of the documents before it that the hearing officer has erred,

the Commission may without determining whether to hear the appeal remand the case for further hearing in accordance with its instructions without conducting an appeal hearing. Both parties shall be notified as to the time of the re-hearing, which shall be conducted within 30 days of the remand by the Commission. In those cases where the Commission is able to determine on the basis of the documents before it that the hearing officer’s findings contain numerical or clerical inaccuracies, or require clarification, the Commission may continue the hearing for purposes of referring the case back to said hearing officer in order to correct the findings. (15) Appeals accepted by the Commission shall be heard within 45 days of the filing of an appeal. Within 30 days of the filing of an appeal, both parties shall be notified in writing as to whether the appeal has been accepted. If the appeal has been accepted, the notice shall state the time of the hearing and the nature of the hearing. Such notice must be mailed at least 10 days prior to the hearing. (16) At the appeal hearing, the parties shall have an opportunity to present oral and written argument in support of their positions. The Commission may in its discretion allow the parties to present additional evidence that was not considered by the hearing officer. After such hearing and after any further investigation which the Commission may deem necessary, the Commission may, upon hearing the appeal, affirm, reverse or modify the hearing officer’s decision or may remand the case for further hearing in accordance with its findings. The Commission’s decision must be rendered within 45 days of the completion of the hearing and the parties must be notified of such decision. (17) In accordance with the above subsection, the Commission shall give the parties written notice of the decision. The notice shall state that the decision is final. (b) Civil Enforcement. The City or any applicant whose rights under this Article 49 have been violated may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction against the Housing Provider or other person violating this Article 49, and, upon prevailing, shall be entitled to such legal or equitable relief as may be appropriate to remedy the violation including, but not limited to: reinstatement; back pay; the payment of benefits or pay unlawfully withheld; the payment of an additional sum as liquidated damages in the amount of $1,000 to each employee, applicant or other person whose rights under this Article 49 were violated for each day such violation continued or was permitted to continue; appropriate injunctive relief; and, further shall be awarded reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. An applicant may institute a civil action under this subsection (b) only if: (1) The applicant has filed a complaint with the Director of HRC; (2) 90 days have passed since the filing of the complaint; (3) After such 90-day period has passed, the applicant provides 30-day written notice to the Director of HRC and the City Attorney’s Office of his or her or their intent to initiate civil proceedings; and (4) The City Attorney’s Office has not provided notice to the applicant of the City’s intent to initiate civil proceedings by the end of the 30-day period. (c) Interest. In any administrative or civil action brought under this Article, the HRC or court, as the case may be, shall award interest on all amounts due and unpaid at the rate of interest specified in subdivision (b) of Section 3289 of the California Civil Code. (d) Remedies Cumulative. The remedies, penalties, and procedures provided under this Article are cumulative. (e) Limitation on Actions. Civil Actions to enforce the employment provisions of this Article must be filed within one year after the date of the violation. This limitations period shall not commence until the date the violation was discovered or could reasonably have been discovered. (f) Tracking of Complaints. HRC shall maintain a record of the number and types of complaints it receives alleging violations of this Article, and the resolution of those complaints. HRC shall report this information to the Board of Supervisors annually. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014; amended by Ord. 249-14 , File No. 140878, App. 12/17/2014, Eff. 1/16/2015; Ord. 54-18, File No. 171170, App. 4/13/2018, Eff. 5/14/2018, Oper. 10/1/2018; Ord. 128-26, File No. 260540, App. 7/10/2026, Eff. 8/10/2026) (Former Sec. 4911 added by Ord. 61-01, File No. 002197, App. 4/20/2001; repealed by Ord. 234-06, File No. 060892, App. 9/14/2006) CODIFICATION NOTE

1. So in Ord. 128-26. SEC. 4912. HOUSING PROVIDER RECORDS. (a) A Housing Provider shall maintain and retain records of tenant application forms, and other pertinent data and records required under this Article, for a period of three years, and shall allow the HRC access to such records, with appropriate notice and at a mutually agreeable time, to monitor compliance with the requirements of this Article. (b) A Housing Provider shall provide information to the HRC, or the HRC's designee, on an annual basis as may be required to verify the Housing Provider's compliance with this Article. (c) In no event shall the HRC require a Housing Provider to provide any information or documents the disclosure of which would violate state or federal law. (d) Where a Housing Provider does not maintain or retain adequate records documenting compliance with this Article or does not allow the HRC reasonable access to such records, it shall be presumed that the Housing Provider did not comply with this Article, absent clear and convincing evidence otherwise. The Office of Treasurer and Tax Collector shall have the authority to provide any and all nonfinancial information to the HRC necessary to fulfill the HRC's responsibilities as the enforcing agenc

this Article or does not allow the HRC reasonable access to such records, it shall be presumed that the Housing Provider did not comply with this Article, absent clear and convincing evidence otherwise. The Office of Treasurer and Tax Collector shall have the authority to provide any and all nonfinancial information to the HRC necessary to fulfill the HRC's responsibilities as the enforcing agency under this Article. With regard to all such information provided by the Office of Treasurer and Tax Collector, the HRC shall be subject to the confidentiality provisions of Subsection

(a) of Section 6.22-1 of the San Francisco Business and Tax Regulations Code. (e) Pursuant to its rulemaking authority under this Article, the HRC shall adopt rules that establish procedures for Housing Providers to maintain and retain accurate records and to provide annual reporting of compliance to the HRC in a manner that does not require disclosure of any information that would violate State or Federal privacy laws. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014) (Former Sec. 4912 added by Ord. 61-01, File No. 002197, App. 4/20/2001; repealed by Ord. 234-06, File No. 060892, App. 9/14/2006) SEC. 4913. RULEMAKING. (a) The Director of OLSE shall have authority to adopt regulations and guidelines that implement the employment provisions of this Article or that relate to provisions of this Article of general import or applicability; provided, that the Director of OLSE may adopt regulations or guidelines relating to provisions of general import or applicability only after consultation with the Director of HRC and the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development. (b) A designee of the Director of OLSE shall not have the authority under subsection (a) to adopt regulations or guidelines. But, at the discretion of the Director of OLSE, a designee shall have the authority to conduct hearings leading to the adoption of regulations or guidelines, and to consult with the Director of HRC and the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development regarding regulations or guidelines relating to provisions of general import or applicability. (c) The HRC, in consultation with the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development, shall have authority to adopt regulations and guidelines that implement the housing provisions of this Article. The HRC may delegate this function to the Director of HRC. (d) A designee of the Director of HRC shall not have the authority under subsection (c) to adopt regulations or guidelines. But, at the discretion of the Director of HRC, a designee shall have the authority to conduct hearings leading to the adoption of regulations or guidelines, and to consult with the Director of OLSE and the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development regarding regulations or guidelines relating to provisions of general import or applicability. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014) (Former Sec. 4913 added by Ord. 61-01, File No. 002197, App. 4/20/2001; repealed by Ord. 234-06, File No. 060892, App. 9/14/2006) SEC. 4914. OUTREACH. (a) The OLSE shall establish a community-based outreach program to conduct education and outreach to employees, applicants, and potential applicants for employment regarding rights and procedures under this Article. The program may be targeted at workers or potential workers in industries or communities where, in the judgment of the OLSE, the need for education and outreach is greatest. (b) The HRC, in consultation with the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development, shall establish a community-based outreach program to conduct education and outreach to applicants and potential applicants for housing regarding rights and procedures under this Article. The program may be targeted at individuals or communities where, in the judgment of the HRC, the need for education and outreach is greatest. (c) In establishing outreach programs as required by subsections (a) and (b), the OLSE and the HRC may partner with each other and/or with community-based organizations. Nothing in this Section 4914 shall preclude the OLSE or the HRC, by contract or grant, and consistent with other provisions of City law, from engaging the services of such organizations in establishing such community-based outreach programs, participating in such programs, or developing materials for such programs. Nothing in this Section 4914 shall preclude the OLSE or the HRC from combining the outreach programs required by subsections (a) and (b) with other related community outreach programs. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014) (Former Sec. 4914 added by Ord. 61-01, File No. 002197, App. 4/20/2001; repealed by Ord. 234-06, File No. 060892, App. 9/14/2006) SEC. 4915. OTHER LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. This Article provides the minimum requirements pertaining to the protection of applicants for employment, potential applicants for employment, employees, and applicants and potential applicants for the rental and lease of residential real property, and shall not be construed to preempt, limit, or otherwise affect the applicability of any other law, regulation, requirement, policy, or standard, or, with regard to employment, any provision of a collective bargaining agreement, that provides for greater or other rights of or protections for applicants, potential applicants, or employees. This provision shall apply both to laws, regulations, requirements, policies, standards, and collective bargaining agreements in existence at the time the Article becomes operative, and to those that come into existence thereafter. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014)

(Former Sec. 4915 added by Ord. 61-01, File No. 002197, App. 4/20/2001; repealed by Ord. 234-06, File No. 060892, App. 9/14/2006) SEC. 4916. PREEMPTION. The City recognizes that in some circumstances state or federal law governs some of the matters addressed in this Article. Nothing in this Article shall be interpreted or applied by a court or an agency of City government so as to create any requirement, power, or duty in conflict with federal or state law or with a requirement of any government agency, including any agency of City government, implementing federal or state law. Consistent with the foregoing preemption principle, for example, the OLSE and the HRC are authorized to not enforce any provision of this Article upon determining that its application in a particular context would conflict with federal or state law or with a requirement of a government agency implementing federal or state law. As another example consistent with the foregoing preemption principle, Employers may inquire about criminal convictions outside of the time periods set forth in this Article where required by federal or state law or a government agency implementing federal or state law. These examples are illustrative and do not limit the scope of the preemption principle stated in this Section 4916. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014) (Former Sec. 4916 added by Ord. 61-01, File No. 002197, App. 4/20/2001; repealed by Ord. 234-06, File No. 060892, App. 9/14/2006) SEC. 4917. CITY UNDERTAKING LIMITED TO PROMOTION OF GENERAL WELFARE. In enacting and implementing this Article, the City is assuming an undertaking only to promote the general welfare. The City is not assuming, nor is it imposing on its officers and employees, an obligation for breach of which it is liable in money damages to any person who claims that such breach proximately caused injury. This Article does not create a legally enforceable right against the City. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014) SEC. 4918. SEVERABILITY. If any part or provision of this Article including but not limited to a section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, phrase, or word, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of the Article, including the application of such part or provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby and shall continue in full force and effect. To this end, provisions of this Article are severable. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014) SEC. 4919. OPERATIVE DATE. This Article shall become operative on 180 days after enactment and shall have prospective effect only, measured from the operative date forward. Enactment occurs when the Mayor signs the ordinance creating the Article, the Mayor returns the ordinance unsigned or does not sign the ordinance within ten days of receiving it, or the Board of Supervisors overrides the Mayor's veto of the ordinance. (Added by Ord. 17-14 , File No. 131192, App. 2/14/2014, Eff. 3/16/2014, Oper. 8/13/2014) SEC. 4920. CONFLICT WITH OTHER CITY LAWS. If there is a conflict between the requirements of this Article and any City law, rule or regulation existing as of the effective date of Ordinance No. 249-14, amending this Article, the requirements of this Article shall prevail. (Added by Ord. 249-14 , File No. 140878, App. 12/17/2014, Eff. 1/16/2015) ARTICLE 50:

CRIMINAL HISTORY IN ADMISSION TO POST-SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS Sec. 5001. Title. Sec. 5002. Findings and Purpose. Sec. 5003. Definitions. Sec. 5004. Prohibition on Inquiring about Criminal History in Admissions Decisions. Sec. 5005. Notice and Posting Requirements. Sec. 5006. Implementation and Enforcement. Sec. 5007. Recordkeeping Requirements. Sec. 5008. Preemption. Sec. 5009. Severability. Sec. 5010. Construction.

SEC. 5001. TITLE. This Article 50 may be referred to as the “Beyond the Box in College Admissions Ordinance.” (Added by Ord. 308-18, File No. 181002, App. 12/21/2018, Eff. 1/21/2019, Oper. 8/1/2019) SEC. 5002. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. (a) Around the country, individuals are often plagued by old or minor arrest or conviction records that discourage them from applying for educational opportunities because a “box” on the application requires disclosure of criminal history information that may exclude them from consideration. Research indicates that the collection and use of criminal history information in the application process for post-secondary institutions constitutes a formidable barrier for many individuals with criminal records. Specifically, data suggests that pre-admission inquiries for prior felony convictions is associated with application attrition on college applications. (b) The federal government and the higher education industry have acknowledged this problem. In 2016, the Obama Administration encouraged higher education institutions throughout the country to take the Fair Chance Higher Education Pledge to develop practices to provide formerly incarcerated individuals with a fair shot at educational opportunities. Similarly, the United States Department of Education released a resource guide titled “Beyond the Box,” which provided information for colleges to examine and remove barriers to pursuing a higher education for citizens with criminal records. Several postsecondary educational institutions have voluntarily removed questions about criminal history from their admissions procedures, and The Common Application, Inc., has announced that it will soon allow its member institutions to omit criminal history questions from their applications. (c) In California, it is estimated that approximately eight million Californians have been arrested or convicted. Thousands of people in our local community are directly impacted by barriers to full reintegration into society based on these records. Pre-admission inquiries into prior felony convictions also magnify racial disparities in the criminal justice system, resulting in a particularly negative impact on applicants of color seeking admission to post-secondary educational institutions. (d) Because a post-secondary education is a key to labor market success, policies that increase educational opportunities for people with arrest and conviction records reduce recidivism, promote the financial stability of our communities, and enhance the City’s potential for economic growth. Policies that encourage reintegration and reduce recidivism can also help reduce criminal justice costs. The San Francisco Sheriff’s Office predicts it will spend approximately $90,000 to incarcerate persons in jail in 2017-2018. When a person successfully reintegrates and does not return to the criminal justice system, these costs are avoided, allowing scarce public dollars to be reinvested in programs that make our communities stronger and safer. (e) Many cities and counties in the United States, including San Francisco, have regulated inquiries into criminal history in other contexts, such as in housing and employment decisions. In the higher education context as well, San Francisco should lead the nation in curbing such inquiries. By addressing roadblocks in the pathways to achieving a higher education, this Article 50 will support individuals that have paid their debt to society and served their sentences by assuring them an equal chance to learn and thrive in society. Prohibiting pre-admission inquiries on college applications will provide youth and adults who have been subject to the criminal justice system a fair chance to realize their full potential and become contributing members of society. Given these considerations, it is wise public policy – in the context of the criminal justice system, public health and safety, and the economy – to improve access to post-secondary institutions for individuals with prior arrest or conviction records. (Added by Ord. 308-18, File No. 181002, App. 12/21/2018, Eff. 1/21/2019, Oper. 8/1/2019)

SEC. 5003. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this Article 50, the following definitions apply: “Admit” or “Admission” means a College’s invitation to an Applicant to enroll in the College, including a conditional or deferred invitation, or a decision to place an Applicant on the College’s waitlist. “Applicant” means (a) a person who has applied for admission to a College; or (b) a person who has inquired about admission to a College, but only where the inquiry relates to the inquiring party’s possible admission to the College, not to inquiries made on behalf of another person. “Arrest” means questioning, apprehending, taking into custody or detention, holding for investigation, charging, indicting, or trying, a person for any felony, misdemeanor, or other criminal offense. “Arrest” includes these actions only when conducted by a law enforcement officer. “College” means any private post-secondary educational institution located in San Francisco that awards degrees signifying satisfactory completion of the requirements of a postsecondary educational program at the associate’s level or above. “College” does not include institutions that are part of the State of California, including City College of San Francisco, San Francisco State University, and the University of California. “Conviction” means an adjudication (following a trial, guilty plea, or no-contest plea) that a person was guilty of any felony or misdemeanor. “Conviction” includes: (a) an adjudication that a person was guilty in a juvenile proceeding of, or had a juvenile petition sustained in connection with, any felony or misdemeanor; and (b) convictions that have been judicially dismissed, expunged, voided, invalidated, or otherwise rendered inoperative, by way of example but not limitation, under California Penal Code Sections 1203.4, 1203.4a, or 1203.41. “Criminal History” means an Applicant’s record of Arrest or Conviction. “Director” means the Executive Director of HRC or the Director’s designee. “HRC” means the Human Rights Commission, or any successor department or office. (Added by Ord. 308-18, File No. 181002, App. 12/21/2018, Eff. 1/21/2019, Oper. 8/1/2019; amended by Ord. 187-19, File No. 190479, App. 8/9/2019, Eff. 9/9/2019, Oper. 9/9/2019) SEC. 5004. PROHIBITION ON INQUIRING ABOUT CRIMINAL HISTORY IN ADMISSIONS DECISIONS. (a) A College may not, for the purpose of considering whether to Admit an Applicant, inquire about the Applicant’s Criminal History, such as by making any direct or indirect statement, question, prompting, or other communication, orally or in writing, personally or through an agent, using any mode of communication, including, but not limited to, application forms and interviews. “Inquire,” as used in this subsection (a), includes providing, or directing the Applicant to, an application form that is subsequently viewed by an Applicant. This subsection (a) applies to application forms devised or administered by third parties that Colleges use for the purpose of considering whether to Admit the Applicant. (b) As subsection (a) indicates, a College may not use application forms that contain a request for information about the Applicant’s Criminal History. A College is in violation of this Article 50 if it makes any such application form available to the general public or to potential Applicants in any format, including but not limited to, posting it on the College’s website, or distributing paper copies. (c) Nothing in this Article 50 prohibits an Applicant from voluntarily, and without prompting, disclosing the Applicant’s Criminal History. (d) A College that receives Criminal History from a person or entity other than the Applicant is not in violation of this Article 50 if the College did not receive the information in response to an inquiry about the Applicant’s Criminal History for the purpose of considering whether to Admit the Applicant. (e) Nothing in this Article 50 prohibits a College from requesting, or obtaining, Criminal History from an Applicant after an Applicant has accepted Admission and agreed to enroll in the College, but Colleges are strongly encouraged to limit inquiry and subsequent use of the information to the following purposes: (1) Offering counseling or support services; (2) Making decisions about the Applicant’s eligibility to participate in activities and aspects of campus life, such as housing; and (3) Making decisions about the Applicant’s eligibility for financial aid or scholarships. (f) Nothing in this Article 50 prohibits a College from, at any time, inquiring about Criminal History when an Applicant has applied to an educational program in a field in which federal or state licensing requirements restrict persons with Criminal History from employment or licensing, as long as the inquiry and subsequent use of the information is limited to the purpose of advising Applicants that their Criminal History may limit the Applicant’s ability to: (1) Participate in educational requirements, such as clinical practice;

(2) Obtain employment; and (3) Receive professional or occupational licenses or admissions. (g) Nothing in this Article 50 prohibits a College from, at any time, inquiring about Criminal History for the purpose of deciding whether to Admit an Applicant who will require, in order to enroll, the College to provide a Certificate of Eligibility for Nonimmigrant (F-1) Student Status. (Added by Ord. 308-18, File No. 181002, App. 12/21/2018, Eff. 1/21/2019, Oper. 8/1/2019) SEC. 5005. NOTICE AND POSTING REQUIREMENTS. (a) Colleges shall state in all applications and recruitment materials that, consistent with the requirements of this Article 50, the College will not inquire about Applicants’ criminal history for the purpose of deciding whether to offer Admission. For purposes of this subsection (a), “recruitment materials” means brochures, flyers, or other documents that the College makes available to Applicants. (b) HRC shall, publish and make available to Colleges, in English, Spanish, and Chinese, and all languages spoken by more than 5% of the San Francisco population, a notice suitable for posting that informs Applicants of their rights under this Article. HRC shall update this notice on December 1 of any year in which there is a change in the languages spoken by more than 5% of the San Francisco population. (c) Colleges shall post the notice referenced in subsection (b) prominently on their website and at any location under their control that is frequently visited by Applicants or potential Applicants. At a minimum, the notice shall contain the following information: (1) A description of the restrictions and requirements that Section 5004 imposes on Colleges when considering Applicants for Admission; and (2) The telephone number and email address that an Applicant, or potential Applicant, may use to make a report to HRC if the Applicant believes a College has violated any provision of this Article 50. (Added by Ord. 187-19, File No. 190479, App. 8/9/2019, Eff. 9/9/2019, Oper. 9/9/2019) (Former Sec. 5005 added by Ord. 308-18, File No. 181002, App. 12/21/2018, Eff. 1/21/2019, Oper. 8/1/2019; redesignated as Sec. 5006 and amended by Ord. 187-19, File No. 190479, App. 8/9/2019, Eff. 9/9/2019, Oper. 9/9/2019) SEC. 5006. IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT. (a) HRC is authorized to take appropriate steps to enforce and coordinate enforcement of this Article 50, including the investigation of possible violations of this Article. (b) An Applicant or any other person may report to HRC any suspected violation of this Article 50. HRC shall encourage reporting pursuant to this subsection (b) by keeping confidential, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable laws, the name and other identifying information of the Applicant or person reporting the violation; provided, however, that HRC may disclose the name and identifying information of the Applicant or person as necessary to enforce this Article 50 or for other appropriate purposes. (c) The Director shall establish rules governing the administrative process for determining and appealing violations of this Article 50. The rules shall include procedures for providing the College with the following: (1) Notice that it may have violated this Article 50; (2) A right to respond to the notice; (3) Notice of the Director’s determination of a violation; and (4) An opportunity to appeal the Director’s determination to a hearing officer, who is appointed by the Controller. (d) If the College appeals the Director’s determination of a violation, the Director’s determination shall be considered prima facie evidence of a violation, and the College shall have the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the Director’s determination of a violation is incorrect. The hearing officer’s decision of the appeal shall constitute the City’s final decision. (e) The Director may impose upon the College an administrative penalty of $250 for each Applicant as to whom a violation of Section 5004(a) or 5005 occurred, which shall be paid to the Applicant(s). (f) The Director may impose upon the College an administrative penalty of $250 for each day a violation of Section 5004(b) or 5005 occurred or continued, which shall be deposited in the City’s general fund. (g) The City Attorney may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction against a College for violating any requirement of this Article 50, and, upon prevailing, shall be entitled to such legal or equitable relief as may be appropriate to remedy the violation, including a civil penalty, and shall be awarded reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. (h) In any administrative or civil action brought under this Article 50, the Agency or court, as the case may be, shall award interest on all amounts due and unpaid at the rate of interest specified in subdivision (b) of Section 3289 of the California Civil Code.

(i) In the event the City brings a civil enforcement action for violation of this Article 50, any person or association by or with a direct interest in compliance with this Article may join in that enforcement action as a real party in interest. In the event the City does not institute a civil enforcement action for violation of this Article, a directly interested person or association, after receiving confirmation from the City Attorney that the City does not intend to institute a civil suit, may bring a civil proceeding on its own behalf and on behalf of the City against that College and seek all remedies available for violation of this Article available under state law, including but not limited to monetary, injunctive, and declaratory relief. Should actual damages incurred by such a violation be difficult to determine, liquidated damages may be awarded at the rate of $1,000 per day of violation, to be distributed equally between a private plaintiff, if any, and the general fund of the City, unless such liquidated damages award is found to be so excessive in relation to the violator’s resources as to constitute a penalty. (j) A directly interested person or association may institute a civil action under subsection (i) only if: (1) The directly interested person or association has filed a complaint with HRC; (2) 90 days have passed since the filing of the complaint; (3) After such 90-day period, the directly interested person or association provides notice to the Director and the City Attorney of the intent to initiate civil proceedings; and (4) The City Attorney has confirmed in writing that the City does not intend to initiate a civil suit. (k) The Director shall have authority to adopt regulations or guidelines that implement the provisions of this Article 50. (l) The remedies, penalties, and procedures provided under this Article 50 are cumulative of any other remedies, penalties, or procedures that may be available to address conduct that is violative of this Article. (Added as Sec. 5005 by Ord. 308-18, File No. 181002, App. 12/21/2018, Eff. 1/21/2019, Oper. 8/1/2019; redesignated and amended by Ord. 187-19, File No. 190479, App. 8/9/2019, Eff. 9/9/2019, Oper. 9/9/2019) (Former Sec. 5006 added by Ord. 308-18, File No. 181002, App. 12/21/2018, Eff. 1/21/2019, Oper. 8/1/2019; redesignated as Sec. 5007 and amended by Ord. 187-19, File No. 190479, App. 8/9/2019, Eff. 9/9/2019, Oper. 9/9/2019) SEC. 5007. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS. (a) Subject to the exceptions noted in subsection (b), Colleges shall retain, for a period of three years: (1) Completed applications, if they contain questions about Criminal History; (2) Incomplete applications, if they contain questions about Criminal History; (3) Blank application forms and other admissions documents that reflect questions posed to Applicants for a period of three years from the last use of the form or document, regardless of whether the form contains questions about Criminal History; and (4) Any other records about the Applicant, if they contain questions about Criminal History or other evidence of the College’s noncompliance with Section 5004. (b) The recordkeeping requirements in subsection (a) do not require Colleges to retain documents that an Applicant submitted along with the Application, such as artwork portfolios, letters of recommendation, test scores, or essays, regardless of whether they reference Criminal History. (c) Colleges shall allow HRC access to such records, with appropriate notice and at a mutually agreeable time, to monitor compliance with the requirements of this Article 50. (d) It is recommended, but not required, that Colleges retain, for a period of three years, applications that were begun but not completed. (e) Colleges shall provide information to HRC, or HRC’s designee, as may be required to verify the College’s compliance with this Article 50. (f) In no event shall HRC require a College to provide any information or documents the disclosure of which would violate state or federal law. (g) Where a College does not maintain or retain adequate records documenting compliance with this Article 50 or does not allow HRC reasonable access to such records, it shall be presumed that the College did not comply with this Article, absent clear and convincing evidence otherwise. (h) Pursuant to the Director’s rulemaking authority under this Article 50, the Director shall adopt rules that establish procedures for Colleges to maintain and retain accurate records and to provide annual reporting of compliance to HRC in a manner that does not require disclosure of any information that would violate State or Federal privacy laws. (Added as Sec. 5006 by Ord. 308-18, File No. 181002, App. 12/21/2018, Eff. 1/21/2019, Oper. 8/1/2019; redesignated and amended by Ord. 187-19, File No. 190479, App. 8/9/2019, Eff. 9/9/2019, Oper. 9/9/2019) (Former Sec. 5007 added by Ord. 308-18, File No. 181002, App. 12/21/2018, Eff. 1/21/2019, Oper. 8/1/2019; redesignated as Sec. 5008 and amended by Ord. 187-19, File No. 190479, App. 8/9/2019, Eff. 9/9/2019, Oper. 9/9/2019)

SEC. 5008. PREEMPTION. The City recognizes that in some circumstances state or federal law may govern some of the matters addressed in this Article 50. Nothing in this Article shall be interpreted or applied by a court or HRC or any other part of City government so as to create any requirement, power, or duty in conflict with federal or state law or with a requirement of any government agency, including any agency of City government, implementing federal or state law. Consistent with the foregoing preemption principle, for example, HRC is authorized to not enforce any provision of this Article upon determining that its application in a particular context would conflict with federal or state law or with a requirement of a government agency implementing federal or state law. Further, this Article does not prevent Colleges from inquiring about Criminal History where such inquiry is required by federal or state law or a government agency implementing federal or state law, but this Article does require that such an inquiry be limited to those aspects of inquiries regarding Criminal History that are necessary to comply with federal or state law. These examples are illustrative and do not limit the scope of the preemption principle stated in this Section 5008. (Added as Sec. 5007 by Ord. 308-18, File No. 181002, App. 12/21/2018, Eff. 1/21/2019, Oper. 8/1/2019; redesignated and amended by Ord. 187-19, File No. 190479, App. 8/9/2019, Eff. 9/9/2019, Oper. 9/9/2019) (Former Sec. 5008 added by Ord. 308-18, File No. 181002, App. 12/21/2018, Eff. 1/21/2019, Oper. 8/1/2019; redesignated as Sec. 5009 by Ord. 187-19, File No. 190479, App. 8/9/2019, Eff. 9/9/2019, Oper. 9/9/2019) SEC. 5009. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Article 50, or any application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions or applications of the Article. The Board of Supervisors hereby declares that it would have passed this Article and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, and word not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any other portion of the Article or application thereof would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional. (Added as Sec. 5008 by Ord. 308-18, File No. 181002, App. 12/21/2018, Eff. 1/21/2019, Oper. 8/1/2019; redesignated by Ord. 187-19, File No. 190479, App. 8/9/2019, Eff. 9/9/2019, Oper. 9/9/2019) (Former Sec. 5009 added by Ord. 308-18, File No. 181002, App. 12/21/2018, Eff. 1/21/2019, Oper. 8/1/2019; redesignated as Sec. 5010 by Ord. 187-19, File No. 190479, App. 8/9/2019, Eff. 9/9/2019, Oper. 9/9/2019) SEC. 5010. CONSTRUCTION. (a) This Article 50 shall not be construed to require a College to give preference to or admit a student with a Criminal History. Moreover, this Article shall not be construed to limit a College’s discretion to choose its students from applicants, consistent with existing law and with this Article. (Added as Sec. 5009 by Ord. 308-18, File No. 181002, App. 12/21/2018, Eff. 1/21/2019, Oper. 8/1/2019; redesignated by Ord. 187-19, File No. 190479, App. 8/9/2019, Eff. 9/9/2019, Oper. 9/9/2019)