Skip to content

Earlier editions: 2026-09

Title XV — LAND USAGE›Chapter 155 — Zoning Code

Eureka Municipal Code § 155.404 Administration

Eureka Municipal Code · 2026-10 edition · updated 2026-10-03 · Eureka

Cite as: Eureka Municipal Code § 155.404 · Text as of 2026-10-03

§ 155.404.010 PURPOSE.

This § 155.404 describes city roles and responsibilities when administering the Zoning Code.

(Ord. 885-C.S., passed 5-21-19)

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 155.404.020 REVIEW AND DECISION-MAKING AUTHORITY.

(A) Summary table. Table 404-1 summarizes city review and decision-making authority when processing permit applications and other requested approvals.

(B) Meaning of notations. Authority roles shown in Table 404-1 mean the following.

(1) “Recommend” means the authority reviews and makes a recommendation to a higher decision-making body.

(2) “Decision” means the authority may approve, conditionally approve or deny an application.

(3) “Appeal” means the authority hears an appeal of a decision by a lower review authority.

(4) “-” means the authority has no role in the action.

(C) Multiple permit applications. For projects that include multiple permits, see § 155.408.050 (Multiple Permit Applications).

(Ord. 885-C.S., passed 5-21-19)

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 155.404.030 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.

Responsibilities and powers. The Department:

(A) Processes permit applications as provided in § 155.408 (Permit Procedures);

(B) Assumes responsibilities delegated by the Director; and

(C) Performs other duties as necessary to administer the Zoning Code.

Table 404-1: Review and Decision-Making Authority

Type of Action Zoning Code Section Role of Authority Role of Authority Role of Authority Role of Authority
Type of Action Zoning Code Section Director/ Department Design Review Committee Planning Commission City Council

Table 404-1: Review and Decision-Making Authority

Type of Action Zoning Code Section Role of Authority Role of Authority Role of Authority Role of Authority
Type of Action Zoning Code Section Director/ Department Design Review Committee Planning Commission City Council
Legislative Actions Legislative Actions Legislative Actions Legislative Actions Legislative Actions Legislative Actions
Zoning Code and General Plan amendment 155.432 Recommend - Recommend Decision
Use Permits Use Permits Use Permits Use Permits Use Permits Use Permits
Conditional use permit [3] 155.412.120 Recommend - Decision Appeal
Minor use permit [3] 155.412.120 Decision [1] - Decision [5] Appeal
Flexibility and Relief Flexibility and Relief Flexibility and Relief Flexibility and Relief Flexibility and Relief Flexibility and Relief
Administrative adjustment 155.412.030 Decision [1] - Appeal Appeal
Infill incentive permit, major [3] 155.412.060 Recommend - Decision Appeal
Infill incentive permit, minor [3] 155.412.060 Decision [1] - Decision [5] Appeal
Minor modification 155.412.070 Decision [1] - Appeal Appeal
Reasonable accommoda tion 155.412.080 Decision [1] - Appeal Appeal
Variance, major [3] 155.412.140 Recommend - Decision Appeal
Variance, minor [3] 155.412.140 Decision [1] - Decision [5] Appeal
Sign Permits Sign Permits Sign Permits Sign Permits Sign Permits Sign Permits
Administrative sign permits 155.340.060 (B) Decision [2] Appeal Appeal Appeal
Creative sign permits [3] 155.340.060 (D) Recommend Decision Appeal Appeal
Master sign permits [3] 155.340.060 (C) Recommend Decision Appeal Appeal
Gulch Greenway Permits Gulch Greenway Permits Gulch Greenway Permits Gulch Greenway Permits Gulch Greenway Permits Gulch Greenway Permits
Conditional Gulch Greenway permit [3] 155.224.050 Recommend - Decision Appeal
Minor Gulch Greenway permit [3] 155.224.050 Decision [1] - Decision [5] Appeal
Other Permits and Approval Other Permits and Approval Other Permits and Approval Other Permits and Approval Other Permits and Approval Other Permits and Approval
Density bonus (ministerial) 155.344 Decision [2] Appeal Appeal
Density bonus (discretionary) [3] 155.344 Decision [1] Appeal Appeal
Design review [3] 155.412.040 Recommend Decision [4] Appeal Appeal
Home occupation approval 155.304.070 Decision [2] - Appeal Appeal
Tiny house on wheels permit 155.304.130 Decision [2] Appeal Appeal
Tree permit 155.304.140 Recommend - Decision Appeal
Zoning clearance 155.412.150 Decision [2] - Appeal Appeal
NOTES: [1] The Director may choose to refer the project to the Planning Commission for review and decision. [2] The Director may delegate review authority to Department staff on ministerial permits and approvals. [3] Applications requiring other discretionary review will be acted upon by the highest review authority, with appeal rights to the next highest authority, except that decisions of the City Council are final. [4] The Historic Preservation Commission conducts design review for projects that alter a designated historic resource as provided in Municipal Code Chapter 157. If a project subject to design review also requires a permit from the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission conducts design review. If the project both alters a designated historic resource as provided in Municipal Code Chapter 157 and requires a permit from the Planning Commission, the Historic Preservation Commission conducts any design review for the project. [5] The Planning Commission acts on the permit only after receiving a written request for a public hearing during the 15-day hearing request period, in accordance with § 155.408.090 (Notice of Pending Action). If no request for a public hearing is received by the end of the 15-day period, the Director acts on the application, and the action is final. NOTES: [1] The Director may choose to refer the project to the Planning Commission for review and decision. [2] The Director may delegate review authority to Department staff on ministerial permits and approvals. [3] Applications requiring other discretionary review will be acted upon by the highest review authority, with appeal rights to the next highest authority, except that decisions of the City Council are final. [4] The Historic Preservation Commission conducts design review for projects that alter a designated historic resource as provided in Municipal Code Chapter 157. If a project subject to design review also requires a permit from the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission conducts design review. If the project both alters a designated historic resource as provided in Municipal Code Chapter 157 and requires a permit from the Planning Commission, the Historic Preservation Commission conducts any design review for the project. [5] The Planning Commission acts on the permit only after receiving a written request for a public hearing during the 15-day hearing request period, in accordance with § 155.408.090 (Notice of Pending Action). If no request for a public hearing is received by the end of the 15-day period, the Director acts on the application, and the action is final. NOTES: [1] The Director may choose to refer the project to the Planning Commission for review and decision. [2] The Director may delegate review authority to Department staff on ministerial permits and approvals. [3] Applications requiring other discretionary review will be acted upon by the highest review authority, with appeal rights to the next highest authority, except that decisions of the City Council are final. [4] The Historic Preservation Commission conducts design review for projects that alter a designated historic resource as provided in Municipal Code Chapter 157. If a project subject to design review also requires a permit from the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission conducts design review. If the project both alters a designated historic resource as provided in Municipal Code Chapter 157 and requires a permit from the Planning Commission, the Historic Preservation Commission conducts any design review for the project. [5] The Planning Commission acts on the permit only after receiving a written request for a public hearing during the 15-day hearing request period, in accordance with § 155.408.090 (Notice of Pending Action). If no request for a public hearing is received by the end of the 15-day period, the Director acts on the application, and the action is final. NOTES: [1] The Director may choose to refer the project to the Planning Commission for review and decision. [2] The Director may delegate review authority to Department staff on ministerial permits and approvals. [3] Applications requiring other discretionary review will be acted upon by the highest review authority, with appeal rights to the next highest authority, except that decisions of the City Council are final. [4] The Historic Preservation Commission conducts design review for projects that alter a designated historic resource as provided in Municipal Code Chapter 157. If a project subject to design review also requires a permit from the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission conducts design review. If the project both alters a designated historic resource as provided in Municipal Code Chapter 157 and requires a permit from the Planning Commission, the Historic Preservation Commission conducts any design review for the project. [5] The Planning Commission acts on the permit only after receiving a written request for a public hearing during the 15-day hearing request period, in accordance with § 155.408.090 (Notice of Pending Action). If no request for a public hearing is received by the end of the 15-day period, the Director acts on the application, and the action is final. NOTES: [1] The Director may choose to refer the project to the Planning Commission for review and decision. [2] The Director may delegate review authority to Department staff on ministerial permits and approvals. [3] Applications requiring other discretionary review will be acted upon by the highest review authority, with appeal rights to the next highest authority, except that decisions of the City Council are final. [4] The Historic Preservation Commission conducts design review for projects that alter a designated historic resource as provided in Municipal Code Chapter 157. If a projec
t subject to design review also requires a permit from the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission conducts design review. If the project both alters a designated historic resource as provided in Municipal Code Chapter 157 and requires a permit from the Planning Commission, the Historic Preservation Commission conducts any design review for the project. [5] The Planning Commission acts on the permit only after receiving a written request for a public hearing during the 15-day hearing request period, in accordance with § 155.408.090 (Notice of Pending Action). If no request for a public hearing is received by the end of the 15-day period, the Director acts on the application, and the action is final. NOTES: [1] The Director may choose to refer the project to the Planning Commission for review and decision. [2] The Director may delegate review authority to Department staff on ministerial permits and approvals. [3] Applications requiring other discretionary review will be acted upon by the highest review authority, with appeal rights to the next highest authority, except that decisions of the City Council are final. [4] The Historic Preservation Commission conducts design review for projects that alter a designated historic resource as provided in Municipal Code Chapter 157. If a project subject to design review also requires a permit from the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission conducts design review. If the project both alters a designated historic resource as provided in Municipal Code Chapter 157 and requires a permit from the Planning Commission, the Historic Preservation Commission conducts any design review for the project. [5] The Planning Commission acts on the permit only after receiving a written request for a public hearing during the 15-day hearing request period, in accordance with § 155.408.090 (Notice of Pending Action). If no request for a public hearing is received by the end of the 15-day period, the Director acts on the application, and the action is final.

(Ord. 885-C.S., passed 5-21-19; Am. Ord. 902-C.S., passed 8-18-20; Am. Ord. 951-C.S., passed 10-17-23; Am. Ord. 962-C.S., passed 7-15-25)

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 155.404.040 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR.

(A) Responsibilities and powers. The Director:

(1) Serves as the review and decision-making authority as shown in Table 404-1;

(2) Makes official interpretations of the Zoning Code in accordance with § 155.108.030 (Official Interpretations);

(3) Enforces the Zoning Code in accordance with § 155.428 (Enforcement and Penalties);

(4) Assumes responsibilities described in Municipal Code § 32.041 (Director of Development Services);

(5) Performs other duties as necessary to administer the Zoning Code and as assigned by the City Council; and

(6) Serves as the Secretary to the Design Review Committee, Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission.

(B) Duties as Secretary to DRC, HPC and PC. As Secretary to the Design Review Committee (DRC), Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) and Planning Commission (PC), the Director:

(1) Prepares staff reports on permit applications and other requested approvals;

(2) Presents applications at public hearings;

(3) Maintains a record of DRC, HPC and PC proceedings and decisions;

(4) Advises the DRC, HPC and PC on the meaning and applicability of the Zoning Code; and

(5) Provides support and technical assistance to the DRC, HPC and PC as needed.

(C) Delegation to staff. The Director may designate one or more Department staff to perform the duties described in division (A) (Responsibilities and Powers) above and (B) (Duties as Secretary to DRC, HPC, and PC).

(Ord. 885-C.S., passed 5-21-19; Am. Ord. 902-C.S., passed 8-18-20; Am. Ord. 951-C.S., passed 10-17-23)

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 155.404.050 PLANNING COMMISSION.

(A) Established. The city must maintain a Planning Commission to review and act on proposed development projects and to assist in the development and application of land use policy and regulations in Eureka.

(B) Composition.

(1) Number of members. The Planning Commission consists of five members.

(2) Member experience. Persons appointed to the Planning Commission must have an interest and/or experience in city planning, land development, land use law, architecture, urban design, natural resource protection, real estate, transportation planning, economic development or other relevant planning-related fields.

(3) Appointment; vacancy. Planning Commission members must be appointed and vacancies on the Commission filled in accordance with Municipal Code §§ 33.001 et seq. (Boards and Commissions Created by Council).

(C) Responsibilities and powers. The Planning Commission:

(1) Serves as the review and decision-making authority on applications as shown in Table 404-1;

(2) Hears appeals on decisions in accordance with § 155.416 (Appeals and Reviews);

(3) Makes recommendations to the City Council on Zoning Code amendments and other legislative matters;

(4) Makes recommendations to the City Council on General Plan amendments and specific plans and other special-purpose land use plans; and

(5) Assumes responsibilities described in Municipal Code § 152.01 (Planning Commission).

(D) Meetings and procedures. The Planning Commission operates according to Municipal Code Ch. 33 (Other Departments, Boards and Commissions), Ch. 152 (Planning and Zoning Administration) and any official rules of procedure or bylaws adopted by the Planning Commission.

(Ord. 885-C.S., passed 5-21-19; Am. Ord. 902-C.S., passed 8-18-20)

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 155.404.060 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE.

(A) Established. The Design Review Committee (DRC) is established to review and approve the design of proposed development projects.

(B) Composition.

(1) Number of members. The DRC consists of five members.

(2) Member experience. Persons appointed to the DRC must have professional experience in the fields of architecture, land development, city planning, real estate, landscape architecture or other relevant design-related profession.

(3) Appointment. DRC members must be appointed and vacancies filled according to Municipal Code §§ 33.001 et seq. (Boards and Commissions Created by Council).

(4) Architect. If the DRC membership does not include an architect, the DRC may, by unanimous agreement, invite an architect, who may or may not be a resident of the city, to serve in an advisory capacity.

(C) Responsibilities and powers.

(1) The DRC serves as the review and decision-making authority as shown in Table 404-1.

(2) The DRC may assume other responsibilities as requested by the Director, Planning Commission or City Council.

(D) Meetings and procedures. The DRC operates according to Municipal Code Ch. 33 (Other Departments, Boards and Commissions) and any official rules of procedures or bylaws adopted by the DRC.

(Ord. 885-C.S., passed 5-21-19)

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 155.404.070 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION.

The purpose and function of the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is stated in Municipal Code Ch. 157 (Historic Preservation). In the administration of the Zoning Code, the HPC conducts design review for projects that alter a designated historic resource as provided in Municipal Code Ch. 157.

(Ord. 885-C.S., passed 5-21-19)

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 155.404.080 CITY COUNCIL.

The City Council:

(A) Takes action on proposed Zoning Code and General Plan amendments;

(B) Hears appeals on decisions in accordance with § 155.416 (Appeals and Reviews); and

(C) Assumes other responsibilities and takes action on other matters related to the Zoning Code according to the Municipal Code and state and federal laws.

(Ord. 885-C.S., passed 5-21-19; Am. Ord. 902-C.S., passed 8-18-20)

Exceptions & meaning →

Explained in plain English

Eureka guides that cite this page.

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — Eureka Municipal Code

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.