State statute
San Francisco — Stipulation and Proposed Order Re: Settlement and Retention of Jurisdiction
California foreclosure, tax-defaulted, court-ordered and probate-sale law and official procedures — verbatim and citable.
- Edition
- 2026-09-26
- Last updated
- 2026-09-27
- Jurisdiction
- San Francisco
San Francisco — Stipulation and Proposed Order Re: Settlement and Retention of…¶
Page 1¶
Attorney Name(s) or Party without Attorney 1 Firm Name Mailing Address 2 City, State, Zip Code Phone Number(s) 3 Fax Number Email Address 4 Attorney for (Name) or Self-Represented 5
6 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8
9 PLAINTIFF’S NAME(S) Case Number: Plaintiff(s),10 v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 11 ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND DEFENDANT’S NAME(S) RETENTION OF JURISDICTION 12 and DOES 1 to 10 Defendant(s) [C.C.P. § 664.6]13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND RETENTION OF JURISDICTION - 1
SFCIV-021 Rev. Nov-18-2017
Page 2¶
Case Number:
1 JOINT STIPULATION
2 The parties in v. , case no. , 3 having reached settlement, request that the Court retain jurisdiction over the parties to 4 enforce the settlement until performance in full of the terms of the settlement, pursuant 5 to C.C.P. section 664.6, even after dismissal of this matter. (Sayta v. Chu (2017) 17 6 Cal.App.5th 960; Mesa RHF Partners, L.P. v. City of Los Angeles (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 7 913.) The parties acknowledge that for the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the 8 settlement under C.C.P. § 664.6, this Stipulation and Order must be filed before 9 dismissal is entered.10 IT IS SO STIPULATED.11
12 Date: Plaintiff Signature 13 Printed Name:
14
15 Date: Defendant Signature 16 Printed Name: 17
18 Date: Attorney for Plaintiff19 Printed Name: 20
21 Date: Attorney for Defendant22 Printed Name: 23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND RETENTION OF JURISDICTION - 2
SFCIV-021 Rev. Nov-18-2017
Page 3¶
Case Number:
1 [PROPOSED] ORDER
2 The Court, having reviewed the above stipulation of the parties, and good cause 3 appearing, orders that the parties’ joint request is GRANTED, and the Court shall retain 4 jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until performance in full of the 5 terms of the settlement, pursuant to C.C.P. section 664.6, even after dismissal of this
6 matter.
7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Date: _________________ Judicial Officer 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND RETENTION OF JURISDICTION - 3
SFCIV-021 Rev. Nov-18-2017