Skip to content

LIHTC, bonds & subsidies

LIHTC compliance and extended use: the covenant is the asset

The credits run 10 years, recapture risk 15 — but the California regulatory agreement runs 55. Every underwrite of a credit asset is an underwrite of that covenant.

Key points

Compliance period: 15 years; credit recapture for noncompliance discovered in that window Extended use: § 42(h)(6) requires 30+ years — CTCAC requires 55 for California deals Form 8823: state agencies report noncompliance to the IRS; Pub. 5913 is the current playbook Qualified contracts: statutory Year-15 exit — but CTCAC deals almost always waive it Year-15 reality: investor exit, resyndication or sale subject to the covenant

The credits are earned over ten years, but the obligations run far longer. Federal law sets a 15-year compliance period (with recapture of accelerated credits for noncompliance) and, since 1990, a § 42(h)(6) extended use agreement of at least 30 years recorded against the land. California goes further: the CTCAC regulations require 55-year regulatory agreements on essentially all deals.

Compliance is policed through the state agency: CTCAC monitors, and reports noncompliance to the IRS on Form 8823 — the categories and cure standards are laid out in IRS Publication 5913 (2024), which replaced the old 8823 guide.

Living inside the compliance period

  • Unit tests, continuously: income-qualified households at initial occupancy, rent ceilings never exceeded, and the available-unit and vacant-unit rules (26 C.F.R. § 1.42-15) governing over-income households and re-renting.
  • Annual certifications to CTCAC, utility-allowance updates (§ 1.42-10), and casualty-loss timelines.
  • Recapture exposure: discovered noncompliance in years 1–15 claws back accelerated credits plus interest from the investor — which is why investor consents and cure rights dominate partnership agreements.
  • 8823 mechanics: the agency must report; cure within the correction period usually resolves the tax exposure, but chronic categories (extended-use violations, habitability) escalate. Pub. 5913's category-by-category guidance is the operative reference.

Extended use: 55 years of rent discipline

The recorded regulatory agreement binds successors: rent and income limits, unit-mix designations (fixed elections under the average-income regulations), affirmative-marketing and, in California, service and preference commitments priced into the original award. Three-year tenant protections apply even after early termination events.

  • Underwriting a purchase of an existing LIHTC asset:
  • Pull the recorded agreement and the last three 8823/inspection files — you inherit uncured issues.
  • Model rents off the agreement's limits (and any deeper CTCAC elections), not the federal maxima.
  • Check the first-refusal/purchase-option stack: nonprofit ROFRs at debt-plus-taxes are common and define your exit universe.

Exit paths at Year 15

  • Investor exit: after year 15 the credit investor exits per the partnership agreement (capital-account puts, options); the operating covenant continues.
  • Qualified contract: the statute's escape hatch — after year 14 the owner can request the agency find a buyer at the formula price, and failure terminates extended use (with the 3-year tenant tail). In California this path is largely closed: CTCAC has long required applicants to waive qualified-contract rights, and § 1.42-18 governs the mechanics where they survive on legacy deals.
  • Resyndication: the common real exit — a new 4% acquisition/rehab execution on the same asset, resetting compliance with fresh capital (see the 25% bond test guide for why this got easier).
  • Sale subject to covenant: mission buyers and preservation funds price these assets off restricted NOI; the covenant, not the market rent roll, is the asset being sold.

Who this affects

Small and mid-size multifamily developersAcquisition and construction lenders underwriting California dealsBrokers, architects and land-use consultants advising on feasibility

Frequently asked questions

Can restricted rents ever be raised to market after Year 15?

Not while the extended-use agreement runs — in California that is typically 55 years, and qualified-contract waivers close the early exit. Plan on restricted operations for the covenant term; the value events are resyndication and refinancing, not deregulation.

What happens if a tenant's income rises above the limit?

Nothing adverse immediately — the unit keeps qualifying while the household's income stays ≤140% of the limit (the available-unit rule), provided the next comparable vacant unit is rented to a qualified household. Mis-administering that rule is a classic 8823 category.

Does buying a Year-16 LIHTC property carry recapture risk?

Federal recapture exposure ends with the 15-year compliance period, and post-2008 rules removed bond-posting on dispositions. What you inherit is the extended-use covenant and any uncured state-agency findings — diligence the agency file, not the IRS.

Who actually inspects, and how often?

CTCAC (physical and file inspections on the federal minimum cycles, aligned with HUD inspection protocols) plus lender/investor inspections. Findings flow to Form 8823; Publication 5913 sets the in/out-of-compliance standards examiners apply.

General information, not legal advice.

Check these rules against a real parcel

Search the full statute and regulation text in the Code Library, or ask the AI to apply these rules to your project's jurisdiction.

Start Free Trial

Primary sources & related guides