LIHTC, bonds & subsidies
LIHTC compliance and extended use: the covenant is the asset
The credits run 10 years, recapture risk 15 — but the California regulatory agreement runs 55. Every underwrite of a credit asset is an underwrite of that covenant.
Key points
The credits are earned over ten years, but the obligations run far longer. Federal law sets a 15-year compliance period (with recapture of accelerated credits for noncompliance) and, since 1990, a § 42(h)(6) extended use agreement of at least 30 years recorded against the land. California goes further: the CTCAC regulations require 55-year regulatory agreements on essentially all deals.
Compliance is policed through the state agency: CTCAC monitors, and reports noncompliance to the IRS on Form 8823 — the categories and cure standards are laid out in IRS Publication 5913 (2024), which replaced the old 8823 guide.
Living inside the compliance period
- Unit tests, continuously: income-qualified households at initial occupancy, rent ceilings never exceeded, and the available-unit and vacant-unit rules (26 C.F.R. § 1.42-15) governing over-income households and re-renting.
- Annual certifications to CTCAC, utility-allowance updates (§ 1.42-10), and casualty-loss timelines.
- Recapture exposure: discovered noncompliance in years 1–15 claws back accelerated credits plus interest from the investor — which is why investor consents and cure rights dominate partnership agreements.
- 8823 mechanics: the agency must report; cure within the correction period usually resolves the tax exposure, but chronic categories (extended-use violations, habitability) escalate. Pub. 5913's category-by-category guidance is the operative reference.
Extended use: 55 years of rent discipline
The recorded regulatory agreement binds successors: rent and income limits, unit-mix designations (fixed elections under the average-income regulations), affirmative-marketing and, in California, service and preference commitments priced into the original award. Three-year tenant protections apply even after early termination events.
- Underwriting a purchase of an existing LIHTC asset:
- Pull the recorded agreement and the last three 8823/inspection files — you inherit uncured issues.
- Model rents off the agreement's limits (and any deeper CTCAC elections), not the federal maxima.
- Check the first-refusal/purchase-option stack: nonprofit ROFRs at debt-plus-taxes are common and define your exit universe.
Exit paths at Year 15
- Investor exit: after year 15 the credit investor exits per the partnership agreement (capital-account puts, options); the operating covenant continues.
- Qualified contract: the statute's escape hatch — after year 14 the owner can request the agency find a buyer at the formula price, and failure terminates extended use (with the 3-year tenant tail). In California this path is largely closed: CTCAC has long required applicants to waive qualified-contract rights, and § 1.42-18 governs the mechanics where they survive on legacy deals.
- Resyndication: the common real exit — a new 4% acquisition/rehab execution on the same asset, resetting compliance with fresh capital (see the 25% bond test guide for why this got easier).
- Sale subject to covenant: mission buyers and preservation funds price these assets off restricted NOI; the covenant, not the market rent roll, is the asset being sold.
Who this affects
Frequently asked questions
Can restricted rents ever be raised to market after Year 15?
Not while the extended-use agreement runs — in California that is typically 55 years, and qualified-contract waivers close the early exit. Plan on restricted operations for the covenant term; the value events are resyndication and refinancing, not deregulation.
What happens if a tenant's income rises above the limit?
Nothing adverse immediately — the unit keeps qualifying while the household's income stays ≤140% of the limit (the available-unit rule), provided the next comparable vacant unit is rented to a qualified household. Mis-administering that rule is a classic 8823 category.
Does buying a Year-16 LIHTC property carry recapture risk?
Federal recapture exposure ends with the 15-year compliance period, and post-2008 rules removed bond-posting on dispositions. What you inherit is the extended-use covenant and any uncured state-agency findings — diligence the agency file, not the IRS.
Who actually inspects, and how often?
CTCAC (physical and file inspections on the federal minimum cycles, aligned with HUD inspection protocols) plus lender/investor inspections. Findings flow to Form 8823; Publication 5913 sets the in/out-of-compliance standards examiners apply.
General information, not legal advice.
Check these rules against a real parcel
Search the full statute and regulation text in the Code Library, or ask the AI to apply these rules to your project's jurisdiction.
Start Free TrialPrimary sources & related guides
IRC § 42(h)(6) extended use & compliance (verbatim)
26 C.F.R. §§ 1.42-5, -10, -15, -18 — monitoring, utilities, units, qualified contracts
IRS Publication 5913 — Form 8823 guide (2024)
IRS § 42 Audit Technique Guide
CTCAC regulations — the 55-year California layer
Guide: 4% vs 9% LIHTC: choosing the credit track
Guide: Section 8, HOME and the labor layers: pricing federal strings
Guide: FHA multifamily debt: 221(d)(4) and 223(f) for small sponsors
Guide: The average-income test: designations, flexibility and the compliance edge
Guide: NEPA and HUD environmental review: the federal clearance before closing