Chapter 31 — CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PROCEDURES›Article III
SEC. 31.10. INITIAL EVALUATION OF PROJECTS.
San Francisco County Planning Code · edición 2026-07 · actualizado 2026-07-25 · San Francisco County
Esta sección aún no está traducida y se muestra en inglés.
(a) Each environmental evaluation application or referral shall include a project description using as its base the environmental information form set forth as Appendix H of the CEQA Guidelines, which form shall be supplemented to require additional data and information applicable to a project's effects, including consistency with the environmental issues included in the Eight Priority Policies set forth in Section 101.1 of the Planning Code and incorporated into the General Plan; shadow impacts, including the analysis set forth in Planning Code Section 295; and such other data and information specific to the urban environment of San Francisco or to the specific project. Each environmental evaluation application or referral shall be certified as true and correct by the applicant or referring board, commission or department. Each initial study shall include an identification of the environmental effects of a project using as its base the environmental checklist form set forth in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines and addressing each of the questions from the checklist form that are relevant to a project's environmental effects; provided that the checklist form shall be supplemented to address additional environmental effects, including consistency with the environmental issues included in the Eight Priority Policies set forth in Section 101.1 of the Planning Code and incorporated into the General Plan, shadow impacts, including the analysis set forth in Planning Code Section 295, and such other environmental effects specific to the urban environment of San Francisco or to the specific project.
(b) The initial study shall provide data and analysis regarding the potential for the project to have a significant effect on the environment. The basic criteria for determination of significant effect shall be consistent with the provisions set forth in CEQA.
(c) The applicant or the board, commission or department that is to carry out or approve the project shall submit to the Environmental Review Officer such data and information as may be necessary for the initial study. If such data and information are not submitted, the Environmental Review Officer may suspend work on the initial evaluation.
(d) During preparation of the initial study, the Environmental Review Officer may consult with any person having knowledge or interest concerning the project. In cases in which the project is to be carried out or approved by more than one government agency and the City is the lead agency, the Environmental Review Officer shall solicit input from all other government agencies that are to carry out or approve the project.
(e) If a project is subject to CEQA and the National Environmental Policy Act, an initial evaluation prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act may be used to satisfy the requirements of this Section.
(f) In accordance with CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21080(c) and 21080(d), based on the analysis and conclusions in the initial study, the Environmental Review Officer shall determine whether there is substantial evidence to support a "fair argument" that the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an environmental impact report is required, or whether a project could not have a significant effect on the environment and a negative declaration is required.
(Added by Ord. 40-01, File No. 001007, App. 3/16/2001; amended by Ord. 116-06, File No. 060224, App. 6/1/2006; Ord. 161-13, File No. 121019, App. 7/26/2013, Eff. 8/25/2013, Oper. 9/25/2013 [see note at end of Article])
Obtén una respuesta en español sencillo con una cita a este texto.
Pregúntale a la IA sobre este código▸ Contenido — San Francisco County Planning Code
- Chapter 10E — PLANNING MONITORING
- Chapter 10E — PLANNING MONITORING
- Chapter 24 — REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
- Chapter 24 — REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
- Chapter 29A — APPROVAL OF POWER PLANT; PLANNING CODE SEC. 303
- Chapter 29A — APPROVAL OF POWER PLANT; PLANNING CODE SEC. 303
- Chapter 31 — CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PROCEDURES
-
▸ Chapter 31 — CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PROCEDURES
Overview- Article I
- Article II
-
▸ Article III
Overview- SEC. 31.10. INITIAL EVALUATION OF PROJECTS.
- SEC. 31.11. NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS OR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLAR…
- SEC. 31.12. DETERMINATIONS THAT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS A…
- SEC. 31.13. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS.
- SEC. 31.14. CONSULTATIONS AND COMMENTS.
- SEC. 31.15. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS.
- SEC. 31.17. ACTIONS ON PROJECTS.
- SEC. 31.18. ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.
- SEC. 31.19. EVALUATION OF MODIFIED PROJECTS.
- SEC. 31.20. MULTIPLE ACTIONS ON PROJECTS.
- Article IV
- Article V
- Chapter 44 — ADULT DAY HEALTH CARE PLANNING COUNCIL
- Chapter 44 — ADULT DAY HEALTH CARE PLANNING COUNCIL
- Chapter 56 — DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS
- Chapter 56 — DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS
- Chapter 61 — WATERFRONT LAND USE
- Chapter 61 — WATERFRONT LAND USE
- Chapter 2 — ENVIRONMENTALLY PREFERABLE PURCHASING ORDINANCE
- Chapter 2 — ENVIRONMENTALLY PREFERABLE PURCHASING ORDINANCE
- Chapter 4 — EMERGENCY PLANNING AND PREPAREDNESS.
- Chapter 4 — EMERGENCY PLANNING AND PREPAREDNESS.
- Division I
- Division II
- Division III
- Division IV
- Division V
- Division VI
- Division VII
- Division VIII
- Division IX
- Division X
- Division XI
- Division 1 — SUBDIVISION CODE
- Division 11 — LIMITED EQUITY HOUSING COOPERATIVE CONVERSIONS
- Division 2 — MISSION BAY SUBDIVISION CODE
- Division 2 — MISSION BAY SUBDIVISION CODE
- Division 3 — CANDLESTICK POINT/HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD SUBDIVI
- Division 3 — CANDLESTICK POINT/HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD SUBDIVI
- Division 4 — TREASURE ISLAND AND YERBA BUENA ISLAND SUBDIVISI