Local zoning · Santa Maria

Santa Maria — Design Review

Q: Where are the parking requirements considered in design review?

Parking is regulated in Chapter 12‑32 ; the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission can approve reductions or adjustments as provided in mixed‑use rules and administrative procedures (see § 12-32 and § 12-49.08 notes) Santa Maria Parking .

Design Review under the Santa Maria local zoning and planning code, with the controlling citations.

Ask a question free See coverage

Last reviewed: July 2, 2026

Overview

Santa Maria does not use a separate, stand‑alone “Design Review Board” term in the portions of the zoning ordinance provided. Instead, architectural, site and landscape review is performed as a required project review step by the Zoning Administrator or, for larger or discretionary cases, by the Planning Commission (through Conditional Use Permits or Planned Development Permits). This page synthesizes where the Municipal Code requires architectural/site/landscape review, what standards matter district‑by‑district, and practical guidance for applicants. See the city's zoning summary for broader context on municipal rules and process for design issues at the Santa Maria zoning page (this is the primary internal reference for design review tasks). Santa Maria Zoning

How Santa Maria handles “design review” (top rules)

Many base zones require that architectural elevations, site plans and landscape plans be reviewed and approved by the Zoning Administrator prior to issuance of a building permit — for example the C-2 district requires project review before building permits (§ 12-13.12) .
The Zoning Administrator has delegated administrative authority and may process use permits and project review for many smaller or intermediate projects; larger discretionary approvals (Conditional Use Permits, Planned Development Permits) are processed by the Planning Commission (§ 12-35.301–.303, § 12-35.302) .
Planned Development findings explicitly require “superior design elements” when modifications are approved, i.e., design quality is a statutory finding for PD approvals (§ 12-35.203) .
Landscape design and submittal requirements (which are part of the project/design review package) are required for new development and reviewed by Community Development (§ 12-44.06–.07) .
ADUs are generally handled ministerially without discretionary design review when they meet objective ADU standards — ADU permitting is ministerial (§ 12-56.06) .
Parking, signage, and other site elements have their own chapters that feed into project review; for example any parking layout or reduction requests go through Chapter 12-32 (parking) and sign design is reviewed under Chapter 12-34 (sign permits consider compatibility with architecture) — applicants should plan to address these topics during design review. Santa Maria Parking Santa Maria Signage

District-by-district design review notes

Notes: below each district name is the code abbreviation in bold and the Municipal Code citations that govern project review and the most decision‑relevant dimensional standards. Where the Municipal Code requires that elevations/site/landscape be approved before building permits, I cite the controlling §. For dimensional numbers I cite the mixed‑use dimensional table (Figure 2) and other relevant district sections.

CC — CC (Convenience Center District)

Purpose / typical uses: pedestrian‑oriented convenience/commercial uses; see permit list in the C-1 and CC chapters (the C-1 chapter allows CC uses by cross‑reference) (§ 12-12.03, § 12-11.*) .
Project review: Elevations, site plans and landscaping plans must be reviewed and approved by the Zoning Administrator before issuance of a building permit (§ 12-11.12) .
Key dimensional standards: See Figure 2 primary district standards (front setback 0 ft for CC; height 30 ft) (§ 12-49.08, Figure 2) .
Where it applies: See the zoning map and § 12-3.01 list of districts; project review requirements tied to § 12-11.* rules for CC.

C-1 — C-1 (Central Business District)

Purpose / typical uses: pedestrian‑oriented retail and services — e.g., clothing, drugstores, restaurants, professional offices; the chapter explicitly lists permitted retail and service uses (§ 12-12.02–.03) .
Project review: Mixed-use and downtown development have specific design expectations; where the C-1 district contains project review language, applicants must submit architectural/site/landscape plans for approval before permits are issued (various sections referenced in mixed‑use and project review chapters) (§ 12-49.08; § 12-12.*) .
Key dimensional standards: Figure 2—front setback 0 ft, height 40 ft for C-1 (Figure 2 / § 12-49.08) .

C-2 — C-2 (General Business District)

Purpose / typical uses: general commercial uses; more intense commercial operations than C-1 and CC. See § 12-13.03 and related subsections.
Project review: Review and approval of architectural elevations, site and landscape plans by the Zoning Administrator is required prior to issuance of a building permit (§ 12-13.12) .
Key dimensional standards and special rules: minimum lot area 7,000 sq ft, minimum lot width 50 ft; building height limit with additional conditions; setbacks when adjacent to residential 10 ft minimum for buildings ≤ 40 ft (§ 12-13.08–.11) .
Where it applies: general commercial corridors and parcels zoned C-2 — check map and site‑specific specific plans for exceptions (§ 12-3.01, § 12-13.*)

R-2 — R-2 (Medium‑Density Residential) and R-3 — R-3 (High‑Density Residential)

Purpose / typical uses: multi‑dwelling residential (duplex, apartments, higher density multi‑family).
Project review: Architectural drawings and plot plans for multi‑family projects shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator for approval (see § 12-8.11). Residential architectural and aesthetic guidelines (roof pitch, materials, etc.) are required as part of review (§ 12-8.11; § 12-8.16) .
Key dimensional standards: per Figure 2 (§ 12-49.08): R-2 building height 30 ft, front setback 20 ft, side setback 5 ft; R-3 building height 35 ft, front setback 20 ft, side setback 10 ft (§ 12-49.08) .
Where it applies: residential neighborhoods designated R-2 and R-3 per § 12-3.01 (zoning map) .

CPO — CPO (Commercial/Professional Office), M-1 — M-1 (Light Manufacturing), CM — CM (Commercial/Manufacturing) and HC — HC (Highway Commercial)

Purpose / typical uses: professional offices (CPO), light industrial and service uses (M-1), mixed commercial/industrial (CM), highway‑oriented commercial (HC) — see each chapter for permitted and conditional uses (§ 12-15, § 12-16, § 12-13A, § 12-16.*) .
Project review: Many non‑residential districts require architectural/site/landscape review prior to building permits (see district chapters: e.g., CM and M‑1 contain development standards and requirements for site plan submittals and review; zoning administrator discretion applies) (§ 12-16., § 12-15.; § 12-35.*) .
Key dimensional standards (Figure 2): M-1 height 35 ft, CM height 40 ft, front setback 0–20 ft depending on zone; consult Figure 2 (§ 12-49.08) .

Quick decision table (most decision‑relevant items)

Issue	What the code requires	Code reference
Zoning Administrator review of elevations/site/landscape	Many districts require approval of architectural elevations, site and landscape plans before a building permit (e.g., C-2, CC)	§ 12-13.12; § 12-11.12
Multi‑family / Residential architectural standards	Submittal of architectural drawings/plot plans for multi‑family; design standards for roof pitch/materials, etc.	§ 12-8.11; § 12-8.16
Dimensional standards (heights, setbacks)	Figure 2 primary zoning district dimensional standards (R‑2, R‑3, C‑1, C‑2, M‑1, CM, etc.)	§ 12-49.08 (Figure 2)
Planned Development design finding	PD modifications must include “superior design elements” as part of findings	§ 12-35.203
Landscaping submittal	Landscape Documentation Package required for projects with landscaping; review by Community Development	§ 12-44.06–.07
ADU design review status	ADUs and JADUs are ministerially permitted — no discretionary design review when they meet objective ADU rules	§ 12-56.06
Parking design and reductions	Parking standards are in Chapter 12-32; reductions can be approved through Administrative Use Permit or CUP/PD per mixed‑use rules	§ 12-32; § 12-49.08 notes; § 12-35.*

Practical note: during review the Zoning Administrator will check compatibility with adopted specific plans (if property is inside a Specific Plan area), historic overlays, and the City's General Plan policies — so check specific plan references early (§ 12-19.02–.04; § 12-13.15). Santa Maria Overlay Districts

Checklist — what an applicant must typically submit for a project that will undergo design/site review

Complete site plan (property lines, existing/proposed structures, setbacks, driveways). See § 12-30.02 submittal list for building moves and general project submittal expectations; many district project review sections echo the need for plot plans.
Architectural elevations (all sides) showing materials, colors and roof form — required for C-2, CC and many other districts (§ 12-13.12; § 12-11.12).
Landscape plan and Landscape Documentation Package when landscaping is required (§ 12-44.06–.07). Santa Maria Landscaping and Screening
Material/color samples and notes addressing “architectural compatibility” with the neighborhood for moves or conversions (§ 12-30.02(d)(5–7)).
Parking plan consistent with Chapter 12‑32 (or entitlement request for reduction) — include layout, stall sizes and lighting plan (§ 12-32.23; § 12-32.*) Santa Maria Parking
Sign program where required; sign permit application includes compatibility findings (§ 12-34).* Santa Maria Signage
Any required special studies: e.g., landscape water efficiency worksheets, acoustic reports if adjacent to arterials, hazardous materials, or environmental review (CEQA) when required (§ 12-44.06; § 12-8.15; § 12-40.*)
Application forms, fees, and noticing materials if the review will be a public hearing (Zoning Administrator hearings/noticing rules appear in the Zoning Administrator and application chapters) (§ 12-35.303; § 12-30.02(g))
For ADUs: compliance with objective ADU development standards so the permit remains ministerial (if the ADU meets the Chapter 12‑56 standards it should not require discretionary design review) (§ 12-56.06)

Risks & Ambiguities

Issue	Why it matters	What to verify
“Design review” as a separate board	The Code does not show a distinct citywide Design Review Board in the retrieved materials — review duties are allocated to the Zoning Administrator and Planning Commission (§ 12-35.301–.303)	Verify with the Community Development Department whether any separate design review committee or advisory body applies to your neighborhood or a specific Specific Plan area.
Whether an ADU will trigger discretionary review	ADUs are ministerial by code when meeting objective standards; but conversions or ADUs that require deviations might trigger discretionary action (§ 12-56.06)	If your ADU proposal seeks exceptions (setback/height variance), confirm whether the ADU will still be considered ministerial.
Applicability of Specific Plans / Entrada / Downtown rules	Specific Plans (Entrada, Downtown) can impose different or additional design rules; project review will defer to those rules where adopted (§ 12-19.04; § 12-13.15; § 12-49.08(c))	Check whether the parcel lies inside a Specific Plan; get the specific plan standards before design. Verify the latest adopted map.
Exact numerical standards for R-1, RSL-1, RMH	The primary Figure 2 (Figure 2 / § 12‑49.08) lists R‑2/R‑3/CPO/CC/C‑1/C‑2/M‑1/CM; some single‑family special districts (R‑1, RSL‑1) have separate chapter text. R‑1 specific dimensional details were not presented in the exact snippets available. (§ 12-49.08; § 12-3.01)	Verify R‑1 numerical standards in the R‑1 chapter (see Title 12 chapter for R‑1) or confirm with Community Development.
Intersection with Title 24 building rules	Zoning review (design, setbacks, parking) is separate from building code compliance; a project may pass design review but still need building permits per the California Building Standards Code. The ordinance references that building code compliance is required but does not restate Title 24 requirements.	Confirm structural/fire/safety requirements with the Building Division and reference the California Building Standards Code. California Building Standards Code

Plain-English Summary

If you are designing a new commercial or multi‑family project in Santa Maria expect to submit full site, elevation and landscape plans and have the Zoning Administrator (or Planning Commission for larger discretionary projects) review them for compatibility with the Municipal Code, Specific Plans and the General Plan; ADUs that meet objective rules are handled ministerially and typically avoid discretionary design review (§ 12-13.12; § 12-11.12; § 12-56.06) .

Source References

§ 12-13.12 (C-2 Project Review — architectural elevations/site/landscape review required)
§ 12-11.12 (CC Project Review — elevations/site/landscape review required)
§ 12-12.02–.03 (C-1 purpose and permitted uses)
§ 12-8.11; § 12-8.16 (multifamily project review; residential architectural/aesthetic standards)
§ 12-35.301–.303; § 12-35.203 (Zoning Administrator delegation, procedure; Planned Development findings include superior design)
§ 12-49.08 (Figure 2 — Primary Zoning District Dimensional Standards table)
§ 12-44.06–.07 (Landscape Documentation Package and review)
§ 12-56.06 (ADU ministerial permit rule — no discretionary review if objective standards met)
§ 12-32 (Parking design and stall standards; see multiple subsections)
§ 12-34 (Sign permits and design compatibility findings)
§ 12-3.01 (Districts enumerated; list of zone codes including R-1, R-2, R-3, C-1, C-2, CC, CPO, M-1, CM)

Sources

Retrieved passages

Santa Maria Zoning Code (Title Report) High relevance
Santa Maria Zoning Code (§ 10-124) Medium relevance
Santa Maria Zoning Code (Section 12-13.12.) Medium relevance
Santa Maria Zoning Code (Section 12-13.07.) Medium relevance
Santa Maria Zoning Code (§ 1) Medium relevance
Santa Maria Zoning Code (Section 12-51.04.) Medium relevance
Santa Maria Zoning Code (§ 1) Medium relevance
Santa Maria Zoning Code (§ 1) Medium relevance
Santa Maria Zoning Code (Section 12-8.11.) Medium relevance
Santa Maria Zoning Code (Section 12-47.14.) Medium relevance
Santa Maria Zoning Code (§ 1) Medium relevance
Santa Maria Zoning Code (§ 10-89.4) Medium relevance
Santa Maria Zoning Code (title except) Medium relevance
Santa Maria Zoning Code (Section 12-56.05.) Medium relevance
Santa Maria Zoning Code (§ 10-82.3) Medium relevance

Cited sections

Official Santa Maria code library

Frequently asked questions

Do I need design review in Santa Maria?

If your project is in a district that requires project review, yes — the code requires submission and approval of architectural elevations, site and landscape plans by the Zoning Administrator (examples: C-2, CC) prior to building permits (§ 12-13.12; § 12-11.12) .

What can I expect the Zoning Administrator to check?

Expect review for consistency with the Municipal Code, adopted Specific Plans, compatibility with neighborhood character, landscaping and parking layout; multi‑family projects must submit architectural drawings/plot plans (§ 12-8.11; § 12-13.12; § 12-44.06) .

What are the setback and height standards for common districts?

Primary district dimensional standards are shown in Figure 2: for example R-2 front setback 20 ft; building height 30 ft; C-1 front setback 0 ft; height 40 ft — see Figure 2 / § 12-49.08 for the complete table (§ 12-49.08) .

Are ADUs subject to discretionary design review?

No — the code states ADUs/JADUs are permitted ministerially without discretionary review if they meet the objective ADU standards; the Community Development Director issues building permits for compliant ADUs (§ 12-56.06) .

What if my parcel is in a Specific Plan or Historic overlay?

Specific Plans and overlay districts can impose additional or different design rules; the Municipal Code instructs that Specific Plan standards apply in their areas and that H (historic) overlays can require Planning Commission development plan approval (§ 12-19.04; § 12-25A.04) .

Where are the parking requirements considered in design review?

Parking is regulated in Chapter 12‑32; the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission can approve reductions or adjustments as provided in mixed‑use rules and administrative procedures (see § 12-32 and § 12-49.08 notes) Santa Maria Parking .

What findings will the Planning Commission look for on a Planned Development with design exceptions?

For PD approvals that modify development standards the decision body must find the modifications are consistent with the General Plan and include “superior design elements” that mitigate impacts — these are explicit PD findings (§ 12-35.203) .

Do sign permits undergo design compatibility review?

Yes — sign permits require findings that signage is compatible with the building and consistent with the City’s community design goals; the Zoning Administrator assesses sign compatibility during the sign permit process (§ 12-34.*) Santa Maria Signage .

Where do building code (Title 24) rules fit in?

Building code compliance (structural, life safety) is separate from zoning design review; a project that passes zoning/design review still must comply with the California Building Standards Code for building permits. For building‑code questions consult the Building Division and Title 24 resources. California Building Standards Code

If my project requires less parking than Chapter 12‑32 requires, can that be approved as part of design review?

Yes — the code allows the Zoning Administrator to approve up to a 10% parking reduction administratively, and the Planning Commission up to 25% through Conditional Use or Planned Development processes for qualifying mixed‑use projects (§ 12-49.08 notes; § 12-32.*)

Ask about any Santa Maria property

Get a cited, plain-English answer on Santa Maria zoning, setbacks, FAR, ADUs and permits — for any address.

Start Free Trial