Local zoning · San Jacinto
San Jacinto — Design Review
Design Review under the San Jacinto local zoning and planning code, with the controlling citations.
Last reviewed: July 2, 2026
Overview
San Jacinto requires a formal site plan and design review for most new construction, significant exterior modifications, and many redevelopment projects to ensure compatibility, circulation, landscaping, and high‑quality design. The rules and process live in Chapter 17.630 (Site Plan and Design Review) of the Development Code; key thresholds and review authorities are summarized below. See the city's zoning menu for more on design review, development standards, and related rules for parking, overlay districts, ADUs, the California Building Standards Code, signage and landscaping.
What the code requires (core rules)
- A Site Plan and Design Review is generally required before anyone constructs, relocates, rebuilds, or significantly enlarges or modifies a structure or site; see § 17.630.020 .
- The Building Official must refer building or grading permit applications subject to design review to the Director for processing in compliance with § 17.630.020.B .
- Thresholds determine who decides (Director vs. Planning Commission) and what triggers Commission hearings; these thresholds and the Table 6‑2 review matrix are in § 17.630.030 and Table 6‑2 (Review Authority) .
- The Director or Commission must act within 30 working days after submittal of a complete application (timing set out in § 17.630.050 and related processing rules) .
- The review considers explicit findings including compliance with the Development Code, compatibility, parking/circulation, landscaping and any adopted design guidelines; see the review criteria in § 17.630.040.C.5‑j .
Practical takeaway: projects that materially change form, size, height, or site layout normally must clear design review before building permits.
District‑by‑district breakdown (how design review interfaces with specific zones)
Below are San Jacinto zoning districts where design review expectations and zone standards are frequently relevant. The city’s Table 2‑1 lists these zones in Article 2 (Zones) § 17.200.020 .
RE — Residential Estate
- Purpose: Very‑low‑density residential (large lots, preserve rural/estate character) § 17.200.020 .
- Typical permitted uses: Estate single‑family dwellings, accessory structures, limited agricultural uses (see Table 2‑2 for full list) § 17.200.020 .
- Design review notes: Fences, walls and larger accessory structures are subject to the general fence/wall standards and may require Director review; see § 17.315.020 and Table 3‑4 (fence heights) .
- Where it applies: Outlying estate neighborhoods shown on the Zoning Map per § 17.200.030 .
RR — Rural Residential
- Purpose: Low‑intensity residential with some rural/agrarian character § 17.200.020 .
- Typical permitted uses: Single‑family dwellings, accessory agricultural uses; the -RAAB overlay may add cottage business allowances § 17.235.030 .
- Design review notes: Projects in RR are subject to site plan and design review when they alter structures (Chapter 17.630) and fence/wall rules are specialized for RE/RR in Table 3‑4 (4 ft front yard limit) .
- Where it applies: Low‑density neighborhoods and edge areas identified on the Zoning Map § 17.200.020 .
RL — Residential, Low‑Density
- Purpose: Typical single‑family neighborhood zone implementing low‑density General Plan land uses § 17.200.020 .
- Typical permitted uses: Single‑family dwellings (R‑1 style), accessory structures; specific use table (Table 2‑2) shows permit types.
- Key standards and design integration: Lot coverage and setbacks follow Table 2‑4 (Development Standards for Residential Zones) and Residential Development Design Regulations apply (rating system, point thresholds) in § 17.425.020; small single‑family infill on a legal parcel is exempt from SPDR, see exemptions list § 17.630.030.D.1 . Parking is evaluated under Chapter 17.330 during review § 17.425.020.D.6 .
- Where it applies: Standard suburban neighborhoods per the Zoning Map § 17.200.030 .
MU — Mixed‑Use
- Purpose: Combine residential and nonresidential uses with pedestrian orientation; design standards emphasize integration § 17.227.020 and mixed‑use descriptions in Article 2 .
- Typical permitted uses: Vertical/horizontal mixed uses, plazas, retail, housing (densities specified below) § 17.227.020 .
- Dimensional standards (examples): Residential densities 10.1–36 du/acre; nonresidential FAR up to 0.75 for MU (see MU definitions) § 17.227.020 .
- Design review notes: All construction activities in MU require site plan and design review and water‑efficient landscape review § 17.227.020.D .
MU‑E — Mixed‑Use Entertainment
- Purpose: High‑density residential combined with retail/entertainment; design emphasis on activation and public spaces § 17.227.020 .
- Dimensional standards: Densities 10.1–36 du/acre; nonresidential FAR up to 1.0 § 17.227.020 .
- Design review notes: All construction activities must pass Chapter 17.630 review; higher design scrutiny expected for entertainment/retail frontages § 17.227.020.D .
DV — Downtown Village
- Purpose: Pedestrian‑oriented downtown core with mixed commercial/residential uses; extra downtown design standards apply § 17.227.020 .
- Dimensional standards: Residential densities 10.1–40 du/acre; FAR up to 2.0 for DV § 17.227.020 .
- Design review notes: Downtown projects are subject to additional development and design standards and are processed through Chapter 17.630 and any specific downtown standards; pedestrian orientation, entries, and façade treatments are considered during review § 17.427.010‑030 and § 17.630 .
CN — Commercial Neighborhood
- Purpose: Neighborhood‑serving retail and services integrated with adjacent residential areas § 17.200.020 (Table 2‑1) .
- Typical permitted uses: Small retail, services, offices (see Table 2‑2 for specific permit types) § 17.200.020 .
- Design review notes: Shopping centers and retail developments abutting residential zones have additional setback, wall/screening, and landscape standards and must file a site plan and design review § 17.415.030 and § 17.415.040 .
Key decision‑relevant standards (quick reference table)
| What the reviewer commonly enforces | Typical numeric / test | Code reference |
|---|---|---|
| Director vs Commission thresholds (e.g., residential units, building size) | Director decides for up to 8 dwelling units and nonresidential up to 9,999 sq ft; Commission for larger projects and appeals | § 17.630.030; Table 6‑2 |
| Small residential enlargement exemption | Exempt if single‑family infill on legal parcel; minor exterior mods not expanding building | § 17.630.030.D (exemptions) |
| Director action timing | Decision within 30 working days after complete application | § 17.630.050.B |
| Residential design scoring for single‑family | Projects evaluated on a points system; 62 points (80%) required; certain items must be "Yes" | § 17.425.020 and related forms (Residential Development Design Regulations) |
| Landscaping requirement | Water‑efficient landscape plan required; reviewed with Site Plan & Design Review | Chapter 17.325 and § 17.227.020.D |
Process & practical guidance
- Pre‑application: meet the Planning Department and confirm applicable zone, overlays (e.g., -RAAB, -6HE) and whether the project is exempt; see overlay rules § 17.235.030‑040 .
- Submittal: file a complete Site Plan & Design Review application per Chapter 17.600 with the materials in the Department handout and fee (the handout/fee schedule is maintained by the City) § 17.630.040.A .
- Review: Director reviews and may decide or refer to the Commission; public hearing is only required when the Commission is making the decision § 17.630.040.D .
- Conditions & appeals: approvals may include conditions; decisions may be appealed under Chapter 17.715 § 17.630.040.E .
- Building permits: no building or grading permits are issued until the Site Plan & Design Review approval is final, per § 17.630.020 .
Practical tips for applicants: supply a robust landscape plan (Chapter 17.325), address parking per Chapter 17.330, and reference any applicable design guidelines early — the review authority will check consistency with adopted guidelines § 17.630.040.C.5‑j .
Checklist
- Submit a complete Site Plan & Design Review application per Chapter 17.600 and the Department handout § 17.630.040.A
- Provide scaled site plans, elevations, materials/finishes, and a landscape plan meeting Chapter 17.325 § 17.325
- Show parking layout consistent with Chapter 17.330 § 17.425.020.D.6
- Demonstrate compliance with zone development standards (setbacks, lot coverage, FAR, height) in Article 2 Tables (e.g., Table 2‑4) § 17.200.020 & Table references
- If applying for multi‑unit or large nonresidential work, confirm whether Commission review is required per Table 6‑2 § 17.630.030
- Pay required fees (Planning Fee Schedule on file with City) § 17.630.040.A
- Expect possible on‑site inspection and requests for additional materials within 30 days to avoid disapproval § 17.630.040.C.3‑4
Risks & Ambiguities
| Issue | Why it matters | What to verify |
|---|---|---|
| ADU design review applicability | ADU rules are often state‑constrained; local design/fence rules still affect ADU placement | Verify ADU-specific review in local ADU chapter; ADU fence rules referenced in Chapter 17.325 but ADU routing is not fully located in retrieved materials — Verify with the jurisdiction |
| Which body decides (Director vs Commission) | Wrong assumption can delay project (Commission requires hearing) | Confirm threshold against Table 6‑2 and specific project metrics (units, sq ft, hillside, floodplain) § 17.630.030 |
| Infill single‑family exemption | Some single‑family infill is exempt but local Director may still require compliance checks | Confirm project qualifies under § 17.630.030.D.1 |
| Specific dimensional numbers for a lot | Development standards (setbacks, coverage) are zone/table based and vary by zone | Check the applicable zone’s Table 2‑4 and any specific plan; “Verify with the jurisdiction” |
| Historic resource treatments vs. standard design review | Historic properties have separate review routes and possible waivers | Historic procedures and Commission review triggers are in Chapter 17.510 (historic) § 17.510 |
| Building code vs. design review | Design review is a planning action; Title 24 code compliance is handled during building permit plan check | Refer to the California Building Standards Code for structural/code approvals; design review does not replace Title 24 verification (state code reference not stated in the local chapters excerpt) — Not found in retrieved materials for explicit cross‑reference |
Plain‑English summary
If you propose significant changes to a site or building in San Jacinto — new commercial buildings, multi‑unit housing, most façade changes, or anything that enlarges a structure substantially — you will almost always need a Site Plan & Design Review approval before the city issues building permits; the Director handles smaller projects and the Planning Commission hears larger ones and appeals, per the thresholds in § 17.630.020‑050 and Table 6‑2 § 17.630.030 .
Source References
- Chapter 17.630, Site Plan and Design Review: § 17.630.010‒050 (purpose, applicability, review authority, procedures, findings, timelines)
- Table 6‑2 (Review Authority for Site Plan and Design Review) and thresholds: § 17.630.030 and Table 6‑2
- Application filing and processing details: § 17.630.040 (application materials, completeness, concurrent reviews)
- Residential Development Design Regulations (scoring, thresholds, evaluation): § 17.425.020 and related forms/tables (points requirement)
- Zones list (RE, RR, RL, MU, MU‑E, DV, CN) and Table 2‑1: § 17.200.020 and Zoning Map adoption § 17.200.030
- Mixed‑use zone descriptions and MU/MU‑E/DV density/FAR notes: Article on Mixed‑Use § 17.227.020
- Shopping center/commercial adjacency standards and required SPDR for certain centers: § 17.415.030‑040
- Fence/wall standards and front‑yard limits: Table 3‑4 and § 17.315.020 (fences, walls, hedges)
- Historic resource review procedures and when Commission SPDR applies: Chapter 17.510
Sources
Retrieved passages
- San Jacinto Zoning Code (§ 17.630.030.) High relevance
- San Jacinto Zoning Code (chapter and) High relevance
- San Jacinto Zoning Code (§ 17.420.040.) High relevance
- CBC § 17.510.070 (§ 17.510.070.) High relevance
- San Jacinto Zoning Code (Chapter 17.427.) High relevance
- San Jacinto Zoning Code (§ 17.630.040.) High relevance
- San Jacinto Zoning Code (§ 17.630.040.) Medium relevance
- San Jacinto Zoning Code (§ 17.425.020.) Medium relevance
- San Jacinto Zoning Code (§ 17.620.060.) Medium relevance
- San Jacinto Zoning Code (§ 17.620.020.) Medium relevance
- CFC § 300.080 Medium relevance
- San Jacinto Zoning Code (section and) Medium relevance
- San Jacinto Zoning Code (section of) Medium relevance
- San Jacinto Zoning Code Medium relevance
Cited sections
- Chapter **17.630**, Site Plan and Design Review: **§ 17.630.010‒050** (purpose, applicability, review authority, procedures, findings, timelines) fileciteturn0file9 (§ 17.630.010)
- Table 6‑2 (Review Authority for Site Plan and Design Review) and thresholds: **§ 17.630.030** and Table 6‑2 (§ 17.630.030)
- Application filing and processing details: **§ 17.630.040** (application materials, completeness, concurrent reviews) (§ 17.630.040)
- Residential Development Design Regulations (scoring, thresholds, evaluation): **§ 17.425.020** and related forms/tables (points requirement) fileciteturn1file1 (§ 17.425.020)
- Zones list (RE, RR, RL, MU, MU‑E, DV, CN) and Table 2‑1: **§ 17.200.020** and Zoning Map adoption **§ 17.200.030** fileciteturn1file12 (§ 17.200.020)
- Mixed‑use zone descriptions and MU/MU‑E/DV density/FAR notes: Article on Mixed‑Use **§ 17.227.020** (Article on)
- Shopping center/commercial adjacency standards and required SPDR for certain centers: **§ 17.415.030‑040** (§ 17.415.030)
- Fence/wall standards and front‑yard limits: Table 3‑4 and **§ 17.315.020** (fences, walls, hedges) (§ 17.315.020)
- Historic resource review procedures and when Commission SPDR applies: Chapter **17.510**
- SanJacinto_ZoningCode.md
Frequently asked questions
Do I need design review in San Jacinto for a small garage addition?
If the addition increases gross floor area by more than 500 square feet for a residential project or increases structure height, it will trigger Site Plan and Design Review; smaller, minor exterior modifications that do not expand building size are listed as exemptions § 17.630.020; § 17.630.030.D.2
Who decides my site plan and design review application — the Director or the Planning Commission?
The applicable review authority is set by the thresholds in Table 6‑2: the Director decides many small projects (e.g., up to 8 residential units or nonresidential projects up to 9,999 sq ft) while the Commission hears larger projects or appeals; see § 17.630.030 and Table 6‑2
How long will the planning review decision take?
Once the application is deemed complete, the review authority must approve or disapprove the application within 30 working days (decision timing per § 17.630.050)
Are single‑family infill homes exempt from design review?
The code exempts infill development consisting of a single‑family residence on a legal parcel from the Site Plan & Design Review process, but the Department will still check code compliance during building permit plan check (see exemptions list § 17.630.030.D.1)
What design elements does the review authority evaluate?
Review criteria include compliance with the Development Code; efficient site layout; compatibility with neighboring properties; pedestrian and vehicular circulation and parking; landscape and water‑efficient irrigation; and consistency with adopted design guidelines — see § 17.630.040.C
Does downtown (DV) have different review expectations than the suburbs?
Yes. The Downtown Village (DV) zone has higher FAR and density limits and additional pedestrian‑oriented development standards; all construction in DV is subject to site plan and design review and downtown‑specific standards are used during evaluation § 17.227.020; § 17.427.010‑030
If my project sits on a hillside, is there extra review?
Yes — all development on slopes with a natural gradient ≥ 15% is also subject to the Hillside Development rules and gets additional review/recommendations per Table 6‑2 and § 17.305.070 (Hillside Development) references in the review matrix § 17.630.030/Table 6‑2
Will the city require a landscape plan?
Yes. Projects requiring Site Plan & Design Review also require a water‑efficient landscape and irrigation plan in compliance with Chapter 17.325, and landscaping is an explicit review criterion § 17.227.020.D; Chapter 17.325
Can the Commission waive development standards during historic resource work?
For historic resources the Commission may waive or modify applicable development standards and can approve uses to preserve a resource; see the historic resource procedures in Chapter 17.510
Where are the zone rules (setbacks, coverage) I need to follow?
Zone‑specific dimensional standards live in the Article 2 development standards tables (e.g., Table 2‑4) and are applied during design review; consult Table 2‑1 and the applicable zone tables in § 17.200.020 and Article 2 tables
More in San Jacinto code
Ask about any San Jacinto property
Get a cited, plain-English answer on San Jacinto zoning, setbacks, FAR, ADUs and permits — for any address.
Start Free TrialMore San Jacinto zoning topics
San Jacinto Zoning
San Jacinto Land Use
San Jacinto Development Standards
San Jacinto Parking
San Jacinto Overlay Districts
San Jacinto Historic Preservation
San Jacinto Signage
San Jacinto Nonconforming Uses
San Jacinto Variances and Exceptions
San Jacinto Landscaping and Screening
San Jacinto overview