Local zoning · Livingston

Livingston — Design Review

Design Review under the Livingston local zoning and planning code, with the controlling citations.

Ask a question free See coverage

Last reviewed: July 2, 2026

Overview

Design review in Livingston is administered through the City’s Title 5 Zoning Regulations and is packaged in the code as a combined site plan and design review procedure. It exists to evaluate building siting, materials, lighting, signs, landscaping and pedestrian/vehicle circulation to ensure compatibility and reduce visual and operational impacts. The controlling local rule is § 5-6-7 (Site Plan and Design Review) of the City of Livingston Zoning Ordinance; the code states who it applies to, submittal requirements, standards to evaluate, and the review/appeal path.

Note: This page focuses only on what the Livingston zoning/planning ordinance requires about design review (site plan/design review). For building-safety rules (Title 24 / the California Building Standards Code) see the linked resource below.

How Livingston frames design review (short)

  • Purpose: compatibility, harmony, mitigation of non‑aesthetic impacts, orderly development (§ 5-6-7(A)).
  • Who recommends/approves: the Community Development Director prepares a recommendation; the Planning Commission is the final approving body for design review decisions (§ 5-6-7(F)).
  • Triggers: new construction in specified zones, significant exterior alterations, and significant site-plan changes; the code lists the zones where review is mandatory (§ 5-6-7(B)(1)).

First mention links: Livingston treats design review as a zoning function within the broader Livingston Zoning framework; applicants must also coordinate with Livingston Parking, Livingston Development Standards, any applicable Livingston Overlay Districts, and the city’s Livingston Landscaping and Screening standards. Where building-safety or accessibility is involved, confirm Title 24 requirements at California Building Standards Code. Proposals that include signage must submit sign drawings as part of review consistent with Livingston Signage. Proposals affecting accessory dwelling units should still check Livingston ADUs.

District-by-district breakdown (how design review applies and the key standards)

The ordinance establishes multiple zones; the code’s development tables list dimensional controls (site coverage, heights, FAR, lot sizes) and the site plan/design review applicability is explicitly described. The short rule: design review is required in the city’s commercial, downtown and industrial zones, and for new multifamily development in higher-density residential zones. See § 5-6-7(B)(1) for the applicability rule.

Below each district entry indicates (a) the district name as used in the code (bold), (b) where design review applies, (c) typical permitted-use character (as reflected in the zoning matrix referenced at § 5-3-15/Table 3) and (d) key dimensional rules pulled from the code’s development tables (Table 6 and Table 7).

Note: For exact land‑use listings consult the land‑use/zoning matrix at § 5-3-15, Table 3; the ordinance's zone names and development standards appear in Title 5.

R-E (Residential Estate)

  • Where design review applies: Not listed among the automatic triggers in § 5-6-7(B)(1) — review generally not mandatory for typical R‑E one‑unit residential projects unless they are a “significant exterior alteration” as defined by the code or otherwise required by a special permit. Verify with the Community Development Director for borderline cases. § 5-6-7(B)(1); definition reference § 5-7-2.
  • Typical uses: low‑density single-family residential (land use matrix § 5-3-15).
  • Key dimensional standards (from Table 6 / Table 7): maximum height 30 ft, accessory height 15 ft, lot area minimum 10,000 sq ft (see Table 6/7) — these controls are applied in evaluating scale during any review.

R-1 (Single‑Family Residential)

  • Design review: Not listed as an automatic trigger in § 5-6-7(B)(1); however, certain projects may be subject to design/landscape review via other provisions (e.g., PD overlay, conditional use, or if defined as a “significant exterior alteration”) — confirm with the Director. § 5-6-7(B)(1); § 5-7-2.
  • Typical uses: single‑family homes per § 5-3-15.
  • Key dimensional standards: FAR 0.60, max height 30 ft, typical lot widths/minima in Table 7.

R-2 (Lower‑Medium Density Multifamily)

  • Design review: Required for all new development in R‑2 under § 5-6-7(B)(1); also for significant exterior alterations.
  • Typical uses: duplexes, small multifamily (see § 5-3-15).
  • Key dimensional standards: max height 30 ft, max site coverage 40%, minimum lot sizes and widths in Table 7. Additional site planning expectations for pedestrian connections and transitions are enumerated in § 5-6-7(D).

R-3 (Higher‑Density Multifamily)

  • Design review: Required for all new development in R‑3 under § 5-6-7(B)(1).
  • Typical uses: larger multifamily and apartment projects (see § 5-3-15).
  • Key dimensional standards: max height 40 ft, site coverage 40%, FAR 0.50 (Table 6). Design guidance emphasizes transitions to lower-scale neighbors and pedestrian circulation (§ 5-6-7(D)).

C-1 (Neighborhood/Community Commercial)

  • Design review: Applies — C‑1 is one of the commercial zones listed in § 5-6-7(B)(1). Projects require site plan/design review.
  • Typical uses: neighborhood retail and service uses (see § 5-3-15, Table 3).
  • Key dimensional standards: Table 6 controls (heights vary by commercial subzone); landscaping and a 10‑ft perimeter landscape buffer are required for commercial development (§ 5-4-4(B)).

DTC (Downtown/Transit Core)

  • Design review: Applies — DTC is specifically listed in § 5-6-7(B)(1); downtown projects routinely require site plan/design review, and downtown has special pedestrian emphasis in the design requirements.
  • Typical uses: higher-intensity retail, mixed‑use, pedestrian‑oriented commercial (see § 5-3-15).
  • Key dimensional standards: DTC height allowances noted in Table 6; pedestrian circulation and entries emphasis appear in § 5-6-7(D).

C-2 / C-3 (General Commercial)

  • Design review: Applies — both C‑2 and C‑3 are included in the mandatory review list in § 5-6-7(B)(1).
  • Typical uses: broader commercial, regional retail, office, service uses (see § 5-3-15).
  • Key dimensional standards: Table 6 (heights and FAR vary by subzone; some height/FAR flexibilities are available with site plan/design review approval).

M-1 / M-2 (Light and Heavy Industrial)

  • Design review: Applies — both M‑1 and M‑2 are in § 5-6-7(B)(1). For industrial projects the code specifically requires buffering, screened storage, loading at rear, and other industrial site design considerations (§ 5-3-? / industrial design notes).
  • Typical uses: manufacturing, warehousing, distribution (see § 5-3-15 and the industrial use table).
  • Key dimensional standards: Table 6 lists increased height allowances; industrial sites must address screening, circulation, and landscape per § 5-6-7(D) and the industrial design checklist in the code.

PD (Planned Development Overlay)

  • Design review: PD projects are governed by a separate PD process and the City Council has approval authority over architectural style and design within a PD; however PD plans must be consistent with the city’s design guide and will be reviewed for the design standards found in § 5-6-11 and PD guidelines. § 5-6-11(D) and § 5-6-11(B).
  • Typical uses/dimensions: PD permits set their own development standards (Table 6 note and § 5-6-11(B)(e)); many PDs establish bespoke setbacks, heights or open‑space that are then enforced via the PD permit.

Quick reference: decision‑relevant standards & triggers

Topic Quick rule or number Code Reference
Which zones require site plan/design review DTC, C‑1, C‑2, C‑3, M‑1, M‑2, and all new development in R‑2 and R‑3; also applies to significant exterior alterations as determined by the Director § 5-6-7(B)(1)
Review authority Community Development Director recommends; Planning Commission final § 5-6-7(F)
Submittals required (site/arch/sign/lighting/landscape) Scaled site plans, architectural drawings, sign drawings, lighting plans, project description, schedule § 5-6-7(B), § 5-6-7(C)
Occupancy condition Building official must certify development conforms to approved plans before occupancy § 5-6-7(H)
Minor modifications Community Development Director may approve minor mods to approved plans § 5-6-7(I)
Height incentives Up to +10 ft may be permitted with site plan/design review approval (note in Table 6) Table 6 note / development standards
Landscaping minimum for commercial 10‑ft perimeter landscaping along property lines/frontages; subject to site plan/design review § 5-4-4(B)

What the ordinance requires applicants to show (synthesis of code requirements)

  • A complete application on the city form with required fee and copies of all plans (§ 5-6-7(B)(2)).
  • Scaled site plan showing property lines, topography, building footprints, parking, curb/gutter/sidewalk improvements where required, loading/trash locations and pedestrian routes (§ 5-6-7(B)(2) and § 5-6-7(D)).
  • Scaled architectural elevations and materials/colours to permit evaluation of exterior appearance and compatibility (§ 5-6-7(B)(2)).
  • Scaled sign drawings submitted with site and architectural plans (§ 5-6-7(B)(3)).
  • Lighting plan with fixture types, wattage, shielding and illumination contours (specific thresholds that trigger extra scrutiny are listed in § 5-6-7(C)).
  • Landscape plans consistent with the city’s landscape rules (see Livingston Landscaping and Screening and § 5-4-4), and a ten‑foot perimeter landscape requirement for commercial sites.

Practical guidance: show how the project will screen roof equipment and loading, how entries are emphasized, where mechanicals will be hidden, and provide pedestrian linkages; these are explicit design priorities in § 5-6-7(D).

Checklist

  • File completed site plan/design review application and fee per city submittal requirements (§ 5-6-7(B)).
  • Provide scaled site plan with dimensions, topography, parking, circulation, loading and landscape areas (§ 5-6-7(B)(2); § 5-6-7(D)).
  • Provide architectural elevations showing materials, colors, and roof‑equipment screening (§ 5-6-7(B)(2); § 5-6-7(D)(3)).
  • Submit sign graphics and dimensioned sign plans with the project (§ 5-6-7(B)(3)).
  • Submit lighting plan with fixtures, shielding and illumination contours (§ 5-6-7(C)).
  • Landscape plan consistent with § 5-4-4 and the city design guide; show perimeter planting for commercial sites (§ 5-4-4(B)).
  • If modifying an approved plan, prepare a minor-modification request or full resubmittal as required (§ 5-6-7(I)).
  • Anticipate Planning Commission hearing (final decision) and prepare for possible conditions or appeals (§ 5-6-7(F); appeal rules elsewhere in Title 5).

Risks & Ambiguities

Issue Why it matters What to verify
Whether a given exterior change is a “significant exterior alteration” The Director’s determination can convert an otherwise ministerial project into a discretionary review needing Planning Commission action and public notice Check the code definition in § 5-7-2 and get a written determination from the Community Development Director. Not found in retrieved materials: confirm the wording in § 5-7-2.
Applicability to R‑1 and smaller residential projects § 5-6-7(B)(1) lists R‑2/R‑3 and certain commercial/industrial zones explicitly; R‑1 is not listed, but other triggers (PD, CUP, overlays) may still require review Verify with Director whether project is exempt or needs review under other sections (PD, CUP, or local design guide). § 5-6-7(B)(1).
Content/authority of the city’s “design guide” The ordinance requires consistency with an adopted design guide but the guide text and its legal status are not included in the code snippets Request the current adopted design guide from staff; the ordinance references it (design consistency requirements). § 5-6-7(D). Not found in retrieved materials: obtain guide from Planning.
Height and FAR flexibility Notes in Table 6 allow extra height or FAR with site plan/design review, but the exact findings/conditions are not spelled out in a single place Confirm the conditions and findings that the Planning Commission uses to grant the extra 10 ft or extra 0.10 FAR (Table 6 notes). Table 6.
Interplay with PD overlay requirements PDs may set their own standards and the City Council may have approval authority for design — conflicts or deviations are decided under the PD ordinance (§ 5-6-11) For PD projects, obtain the PD project plan, PD permit conditions, and Council findings; verify which standards control. § 5-6-11.

Plain‑English summary

If you are building or making major exterior changes in many commercial, downtown, industrial, or higher‑density residential zones in Livingston, you will need to file a site plan and design review application (with scaled site and architectural plans, lighting, signs and landscaping). The Community Development Director prepares a recommendation and the Planning Commission issues final approval; approved plans are enforced at occupancy. See § 5-6-7 for the controlling rules and talk to planning staff early to determine whether your project is “significant” enough to trigger review.

Source References

  • City of Livingston, Title 5 Zoning Regulations — short title and general application (Title 5 introductory text). § 5-1-1; § 5-1-2.
  • Site Plan and Design Review: § 5-6-7 (Intent; Application; Project description; Design requirements; Process; Occupancy; Minor modifications).
  • Landscaping requirements and relation to design review: § 5-4-4 (10‑ft perimeter landscaping for commercial).
  • Development standards (Table 6 — heights, FAR, site coverage) and lot configurations (Table 7): (development standards tables and notes).
  • PD Overlay process and design authority: § 5-6-11 (PD permit process and design guidelines).
  • Land use/zoning matrix and review thresholds: § 5-3-15, Table 3 (use permissions) and related review notes for outdoor dining and similar uses that reference site plan/design review.

Sources

Retrieved passages

  • Livingston Zoning Code (title to) High relevance
  • Livingston Zoning Code (§ 5-5-13) High relevance
  • Livingston Zoning Code (section shall) High relevance
  • Livingston Zoning Code High relevance
  • Livingston Zoning Code (§ 5-6-9) High relevance
  • Livingston Zoning Code (§ 5-4-3) High relevance
  • Livingston Zoning Code (§ 5-6-12) High relevance
  • CBC § 5 (Title 5) Medium relevance

Cited sections

Frequently asked questions

Do I need design review for a single‑family house in Livingston?

If your project is in R‑2 or R‑3 (new development) it explicitly requires site plan/design review; R‑1 or smaller residential lots are not listed as mandatory in § 5-6-7(B)(1), but significant exterior alterations or overlay/PD rules may still trigger review — confirm with the Community Development Director. § 5-6-7(B)(1).

Which zones always require site plan/design review?

The code lists DTC, C‑1, C‑2, C‑3, M‑1, M‑2 and all new development in R‑2 and R‑3 as subject to site plan/design review; significant exterior alterations elsewhere may also be reviewed per the Director’s determination. § 5-6-7(B)(1).

Who issues the final decision on design review applications?

The Community Development Director prepares a written recommendation; the Planning Commission is the final approving body for design review decisions, with appeal rights governed by the code. § 5-6-7(F).

What must be included in the design review submittal?

Submit a completed city application, scaled site plan, architectural elevations (materials/colors), sign drawings, lighting plan with shielding and illumination details, landscape plan, and project schedule — the code lists these submittal elements in § 5-6-7(B) and (C).

Can the Planning Commission require curbs, gutters or sidewalks as a condition?

Yes — approval of a site plan may be conditioned upon the construction of curbs, gutters and/or sidewalks on the subject property per the intent and application provisions of § 5-6-7(A) and (B). § 5-6-7(A).

Is there a streamlined path for small changes to an approved plan?

Yes — the Community Development Director may approve “minor modifications” to previously approved plans when the change is in substantial conformity; the Director can approve, conditionally approve, or deny such modifications (§ 5-6-7(I)). § 5-6-7(I).

Will I be allowed extra height or FAR if I go through design review?

Table 6 in the development standards notes that an additional 10 feet in height and up to 0.10 FAR may be permitted with site plan/design review approval subject to findings (see Table 6 notes and the Planning Commission’s discretion). Verify the criteria for those findings with staff. Table 6 (notes).

What happens at occupancy after design review approval?

Before occupancy the building official must certify that the site or structure has been developed in conformity with the approved plans and conditions imposed during site plan/design review (§ 5-6-7(H)). § 5-6-7(H).

Who decides whether an exterior work is “significant” enough to require design review?

The Community Development Director makes determinations about “significant exterior alterations” for the purposes of triggering review; the code refers to § 5-7-2 for definitions and Director determination procedures — check that definition or get a written determination. § 5-6-7(B)(1); see § 5-7-2.

If my site is in a PD overlay, who reviews design and style?

PD Overlay Districts are processed under § 5-6-11; the City Council has approval authority over architectural style and design within the PD, and PD design must be consistent with the city’s adopted design guide. § 5-6-11.

More in Livingston code

Ask about any Livingston property

Get a cited, plain-English answer on Livingston zoning, setbacks, FAR, ADUs and permits — for any address.

Start Free Trial

More Livingston zoning topics

Livingston Zoning

Livingston Land Use

Livingston Development Standards

Livingston Parking

Livingston Overlay Districts

Livingston Historic Preservation

Livingston Signage

Livingston Nonconforming Uses

Livingston Variances and Exceptions

Livingston Landscaping and Screening

Livingston overview