Local zoning · Hillsborough
Hillsborough — Design Review
Design Review under the Hillsborough local zoning and planning code, with the controlling citations.
Last reviewed: July 2, 2026
Overview
Design review in Hillsborough is administered through the Hillsborough Zoning Ordinance (Title 17) and routed primarily through the town's Architecture and Design Review processes referenced in Chapter 2.12. Design review is a mandatory step for specific projects (for example certain landscaping, ADU exceptions, large homes, and projects following a variance) and is used to confirm neighborhood compatibility, compliance with design guidelines, and the town's development standards. Key triggers and standards are set out across Title 17: permitting triggers in the ADU chapter, landscaping chapter, setbacks/height/FAR chapters, and variance rules — with procedural detail referenced to Chapter 2.12 (the design‑review procedure) which the code repeatedly invokes. § 17.56.060, § 17.52.050, § 17.32.040, and § 17.40.020 are the primary locally controlling cites.
Below I synthesize what the Hillsborough ordinance actually requires about design review, district applicability, triggers, and practical next steps. Where the code points to Chapter 2.12 for procedure, I note that the chapter is referenced but the detailed Chapter 2.12 text was Not found in retrieved materials — verify with the jurisdiction.
What the code says — triggers, authorities, and limits
The code requires design review for certain landscaping projects: landscaping items listed at § 17.56.050 must receive design review approval per § 17.56.060 (design review proceeds under Section § 2.12.070).
An Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) or Junior ADU (JADU) that does not meet all local ADU standards may be permitted only after undergoing the design review process in Chapter 2.12; the ADU exception review and required findings are set out in § 17.52.050. An ADU that conforms fully to § 17.52.020 can be approved ministerially without discretionary design review.
Very large single‑family dwellings (new primary dwellings with total covered floor area in excess of 8,000 sq ft) must be submitted to the city council after architecture and design review per § 17.32.040; the council holds a public hearing and can approve, conditionally approve, deny, or send the project back for redesign.
When the city grants a variance, the owner must apply for design review approval consistent with that variance under § 17.40.020.E.
The code defines building envelope, height, setback, FAR and lot‑coverage rules (which design review will evaluate for visual compatibility even where standards are objective). Key development standards referenced by design review include: street‑line setback 25 ft (see § 17.24.020), the building envelope/height plane (see § 17.28.010), and FAR/lot‑coverage (see § 17.32.030).
The ordinance distinguishes type or notice levels for design review (the code repeatedly cites § 2.12.070 and Chapter 2.12 for “type B” projects, public notice requirements, and appeal procedures), but the governing Chapter 2.12 text that defines the procedural types and timelines was Not found in retrieved materials. Verify Chapter 2.12 for exact application processing times, noticing thresholds, and appeal routes.
District-by-district breakdown (where design review applies)
The code reorganized Hillsborough’s zones into residence districts. The district names and permitted uses are set out in § 17.12.010 and § 17.16.010; design review is applied across these districts where the triggers above occur.
RD-1 — Traditional Residential
- Purpose: preserve single‑family character; maximum density one single‑family dwelling per one‑half acre (exclusive of ADUs). § 17.16.010(A)(1).
- Typical permitted uses: single‑family dwellings, accessory structures, country club (on designated sites), public parks, town facilities (where allowed), and ADUs; some uses require special permit (e.g., private schools) per § 17.16.010(B).
- Key dimensional standards (applies townwide unless otherwise modified): front/street‑line setback: 25 ft (see § 17.24.020); interior setback area 20 ft; height limited by the building envelope starting at 22 ft then 45° plane to a 32 ft maximum as described at § 17.28.010; FAR and lot coverage limits in Chapter 17.32 (see § 17.32.030 and § 17.32.060). Design review will check aesthetic compatibility against these standards.
- Where applied: all RD‑1 parcels shown on the town zoning map; design review comes into play for large homes, ADU exceptions, landscaping projects listed in § 17.56.050, and when a variance is needed.
RD-2 — Mixed Residential
- Purpose: accommodate townhomes and multifamily where the town has designated those parcels; minimum density 20 units/acre on sites so zoned § 17.16.010(A)(2).
- Typical permitted uses: multi‑family housing, public parks/playgrounds, town facilities, ADUs, certain institutional uses (some on special permit). § 17.16.010(B) lists specific uses and special‑permit items.
- Key dimensional standards: underlying townwide setbacks, height plane, FAR/lot coverage rules apply; ADU rules (setbacks, parking exceptions, architectural matching) also apply in RD‑2 per Chapter 17.52 for ADUs. Design review is required for ADU exceptions and certain landscaping/large‑scale renovations.
RD-3 — Governmental and Residential Mixed Use
- Purpose: limited residential and town facilities on identified town‑owned land; cap of 16 dwelling units in this district as identified in § 17.16.010(A)(3).
- Typical permitted uses: town facilities, public buildings, limited multi‑family housing where explicitly designated, ADUs where allowed, and associated public uses.
- Key dimensional standards: townwide standards (setbacks, height plane, FAR) still govern; design review will be used for major changes to town facilities and for projects subject to ADU exception review or variance.
Table — selected decision‑relevant permitted uses and standards (excerpt)
| Topic | What Hillsborough’s code requires | Code reference |
|---|---|---|
| District names / primary uses | RD‑1 (Traditional residential), RD‑2 (Mixed residential), RD‑3 (Governmental/residential) | § 17.12.010, § 17.16.010 |
| Landscaping projects that require design review | Removing protected trees; moving ≥50 cu yd of soil; rehabilitating >10,000 sq ft; installing landscaping for new residence; synthetic turf visible from ROW; grove removal | § 17.56.050 → design review per § 17.56.060 and § 2.12.070 |
| ADU exception (design review trigger) | ADU/JADU that does not meet all standards in § 17.52.020 may be allowed only after design review under Chapter 2.12; findings listed in § 17.52.050 | § 17.52.050 |
| Setbacks & measurement | Street‑line setback 25 ft; interior setback 20 ft; special measurement rules in § 17.24.020–030 | § 17.24.020–030 |
| Height/building envelope | Building envelope: 22 ft above grade then 45° slope to a 32 ft maximum measured from warped plane; see § 17.28.010 | § 17.28.010 |
| Very large homes | New primary dwellings > 8,000 sq ft require ADRB review and then submittal to city council for public hearing | § 17.32.040 |
| Variances → design review | After a variance is granted by the council, applicant must apply for design review as set in Chapter 2.12 | § 17.40.020.E |
How design review is used in practice (plain‑English synthesis / guidance)
Design review in Hillsborough is both procedural and substantive: for certain project types the code requires a design‑review approval before building permits can be issued (e.g., the landscaping categories listed in § 17.56.050 must get design review approval before building permits, per § 17.56.060) and for other projects design review is the path by which exceptions (like ADU exceptions or approvals following a variance) are vetted.
Expect design reviewers (the Architecture and Design Review Board and/or the planning staff and sometimes the city council) to evaluate compatibility with the town’s residential design guidelines, neighborhood character, and the objective development standards (setbacks, building envelope/height, FAR, lot coverage). See § 17.52.050 (ADU exception findings require consistency with the general plan and residential design guidelines) and § 17.32.040 (city council review for very large homes).
The code repeatedly defers procedural specifics (timing, notice types, Type A/Type B categorization, appeals) to Chapter 2.12 and to Section 2.12.070. Because the Chapter 2.12 procedural text was Not found in retrieved materials, applicants must verify the timeline, noticing method, and appeal windows directly with the planning office. Notably the ADU exception rules explicitly require a “type B” public notice under § 2.12.070.A.
Checklist — what an applicant must satisfy (quick list)
- Confirm whether your parcel is in RD‑1, RD‑2, or RD‑3 (zoning map) and the uses allowed there § 17.12.010, § 17.16.010.
- Determine whether your project is one of the triggers for design review:
- ADU that does not meet § 17.52.020 → ADU Exception / design review required (§ 17.52.050)
- Landscaping items identified in § 17.56.050 → design review required (§ 17.56.060)
- New primary dwelling > 8,000 sq ft → ADRB + city council review (§ 17.32.040)
- Any approval following a variance granted by the council → design review under Chapter 2.12 (§ 17.40.020.E)
- Prepare plans that show compliance with objective standards: setbacks (§ 17.24.020), height and building envelope (§ 17.28.010), FAR/lot coverage (Chapter 17.32).
- For ADUs, include the specific ADU materials required by Chapter 17.52 (architectural matching, parking rules/possible exceptions, landscape screening) and be prepared for either ministerial approval (if it meets all standards in § 17.52.020) or design review if it needs exceptions § 17.52.020–050.
- Ask planning staff for the applicable Chapter 2.12 application form, the notice type (Type A/Type B), the public hearing/meeting schedule, and fee amount (Chapter 2.12 details were Not found in retrieved materials). Verify submittal and noticing requirements with the planning department.
- If your project may involve protected trees, significant grading (>50 cu yd) or large landscaping changes, include a landscape plan meeting § 17.56.040–070 and be ready to post security/bonds if required § 17.56.080.
Risks & Ambiguities
| Issue | Why it matters | What to verify |
|---|---|---|
| Procedural details of Chapter 2.12 (notice types, timelines, Type A/B definitions) | The ordinance references Chapter 2.12 (and § 2.12.070) as the procedural engine for design review and public notice — but the retrieved materials do not include the Chapter’s text. Without the procedure you can't compute exact application windows, hearing deadlines, or appeal steps. | Chapter 2.12 text and § 2.12.070 specifics. Contact the City/Planning Dept to obtain Chapter 2.12 and confirm timeline, noticing, and appeal process. Not found in retrieved materials; Verify with the jurisdiction. |
| Whether a proposed ADU is ministerial or requires design review | ADU compliance with § 17.52.020 determines ministerial approval; nonconforming ADUs require design review and "type B" notice under § 2.12.070.A. Misclassification delays permits and can add hearings. | Confirm which ADU standards apply to the parcel, and whether the ADU meets all items in § 17.52.020; if not, expect design review under § 17.52.050. |
| Chapter/section cross‑references (e.g., ADRB vs. City Council roles) | Some projects (homes >8,000 sq ft) may require ADRB review followed by council review § 17.32.040; how ADRB recommendations, dissenting votes, or appeals affect council referral is described but practical expectations can vary. | Read § 17.32.040 and confirm with planning staff how ADRB meetings are scheduled and how staff handles referrals to council. |
| Exact composition / decision authority of the Architecture and Design Review Board | Code references the board throughout (reviews, recommendations) but composition, quorum, and delegation rules are embedded in Chapter 2.12 or other municipal code chapters not present in the retrieved materials. | Obtain Chapter 2.12 and the municipal ordinance that creates/defines the ADRB to confirm membership, quorum, and appeal mechanics. Not found in retrieved materials. |
| Parcel‑specific constraints (historic district, fire‑hazard zone, transit distance) | ADU parking exceptions (e.g., within 1/2 mile of transit, in historic district) and fire/reservoir requirements for 2‑unit projects may change application requirements. § 17.52.020, § 17.54 contain these exceptions. | Verify your lot's transit proximity, historic‑district status, and fire hazard zone; confirm with planning and fire departments. |
Plain‑English Summary
If your project changes the look or layout of a property in ways the code flags — for example removing protected trees, building an ADU that needs exceptions, constructing a very large home, or building after a variance — Hillsborough requires design review. The ordinance points to Chapter 2.12 for the procedure but sets the substantive standards for what the design reviewers check (setbacks, height, FAR, landscaping, and matching the character of the neighborhood). Expect to provide plans showing compliance with setbacks (25 ft front), the height/building envelope rules, FAR/lot coverage calculations, and any ADU architectural/landscape details required by Chapter 17.52. Verify procedural timing and notice type with planning because Chapter 2.12 procedural text was Not found in the retrieved materials.
Source References
- Hillsborough Zoning Ordinance (Title 17) — General title and purposes; zoning map rules: § 17.04.010–030.
- Zoning districts established and names: § 17.12.010 (RD‑1, RD‑2, RD‑3).
- Permitted uses table and district purposes: § 17.16.010 (RD‑1/RD‑2/RD‑3).
- ADU general provisions, architectural requirements, parking, and ADU exception: § 17.52.020, § 17.52.050.
- Landscaping triggers and design review obligation: § 17.56.050–070 (design review per § 2.12.070).
- Setbacks & measurement (street‑line 25 ft; interior 20 ft): § 17.24.020–030.
- Height/building envelope: § 17.28.010.
- FAR, lot coverage, and very large homes (8,000 sq ft triggers): Chapter 17.32, especially § 17.32.030 and § 17.32.040.
- Variance and design review linkage: § 17.40.020.E.
- Parking for ADUs / second units: § 17.36.035 and ADU parking exceptions in Chapter 17.52.
NOTE: Chapter 2.12 (the detailed design‑review procedure and the content of § 2.12.070) is repeatedly referenced by the sections above but the full Chapter 2.12 text and the detailed language of § 2.12.070 were Not found in retrieved materials. For procedural details (notice types, exact timelines, appeal steps, “type B” vs. “type A” thresholds) obtain Chapter 2.12 from the town's municipal code or the planning office.
Sources
Retrieved passages
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (§ 3) High relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (Section 17.52.020) High relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (Section 17.56.050) High relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (§ 26) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (Section 65915) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (section 66333) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (§ 3) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (Chapter 17.54) Medium relevance
- California Fire Code Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (§ 16) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (Section 21155) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (Chapter 2.12) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (chapter or) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (chapter must) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (Section 17.32.030) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (§ 2) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (section is) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (Chapter 2.12) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (chapter to) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (section is) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (Section 801.5) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (§ 4) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (§ 16) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (section are) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (Section 15.24.020) Medium relevance
- Hillsborough Zoning Code (Section 17.24.030) Medium relevance
Cited sections
- Hillsborough Zoning Ordinance (Title 17) — General title and purposes; zoning map rules: **§ 17.04.010–030**. (Title 17)
- Zoning districts established and names: **§ 17.12.010** (RD‑1, RD‑2, RD‑3). (§ 17.12.010)
- Permitted uses table and district purposes: **§ 17.16.010** (RD‑1/RD‑2/RD‑3). (§ 17.16.010)
- ADU general provisions, architectural requirements, parking, and ADU exception: **§ 17.52.020**, **§ 17.52.050**. (§ 17.52.020)
- Landscaping triggers and design review obligation: **§ 17.56.050–070** (design review per **§ 2.12.070**). (§ 17.56.050)
- Setbacks & measurement (street‑line 25 ft; interior 20 ft): **§ 17.24.020–030**. (§ 17.24.020)
- Height/building envelope: **§ 17.28.010**. (§ 17.28.010)
- FAR, lot coverage, and very large homes (8,000 sq ft triggers): **Chapter 17.32**, especially **§ 17.32.030** and **§ 17.32.040**. (Chapter 17.32)
- Variance and design review linkage: **§ 17.40.020.E**. (§ 17.40.020.E)
- Parking for ADUs / second units: **§ 17.36.035** and ADU parking exceptions in **Chapter 17.52**. (§ 17.36.035)
- Hillsborough_ZoningCode.md
Frequently asked questions
Do I need design review in Hillsborough?
If your project is one of the triggers identified in Title 17 — for example landscaping items in § 17.56.050, an ADU that needs an exception under § 17.52.050, a structure built after a variance (§ 17.40.020.E), or a new primary dwelling over 8,000 sq ft (§ 17.32.040) — then yes, design review is required. For ADUs that comply with all of § 17.52.020 the approval can be ministerial; otherwise design review under Chapter 2.12 is required.
What kinds of landscaping projects require design review?
The code lists specific landscaping triggers — for example removing a protected tree, moving 50 cubic yards of dirt or more, rehabilitating >10,000 sq ft of landscape, installing landscaping for a newly constructed residence, and synthetic grass visible from the ROW — and states these require design review per § 17.56.050–060.
What are the Hillsborough setback requirements design review will check?
Hillsborough measures setbacks per § 17.24.020: the street‑line setback is generally 25 ft, interior setback areas 20 ft, with measurement rules in § 17.24.030. Design review evaluates whether a proposal is compatible with these and other development standards.
What happens if I request a variance — do I still need design review?
Yes. After the city council grants a variance the property owner must apply for design review approval as set in Chapter 2.12 (see § 17.40.020.E). That design review is expected to be consistent with the granted variance.
How does Hillsborough handle very large new homes?
Any new primary dwelling with total covered floor area over 8,000 sq ft must, after ADRB review, be submitted to the city council for a public hearing and final disposition under § 17.32.040. The council reviews ADRB recommendations and neighborhood compatibility.
If my ADU doesn't meet the ADU standards, what findings does the town require for approval?
An ADU exception requires several findings listed in § 17.52.050, including consistency with the General Plan, the zoning ordinance, town residential design guidelines, other land use policies, that the project has undergone the Chapter 2.12 design review process, and that it does not endanger health or welfare.
Are ADU parking requirements waived in some cases?
Yes. Generally one off‑street parking space is required for an ADU, but exceptions include when the ADU is within 1/2 mile of public transit, within an architecturally/historically significant district, is part of the primary dwelling or accessory structure, or where local on‑street permits or car‑share arrangements apply; see § 17.52.020(E) and § 17.36.035 for the details.
How do I find the Chapter 2.12 design review procedure and notice rules?
The zoning text repeatedly refers you to Chapter 2.12 and § 2.12.070 for types of design review and notice. The retrieved materials referenced Chapter 2.12 but the full text of Chapter 2.12 (which defines Type A/B, notice procedures, timelines, and appeals) was Not found in retrieved materials. Ask the planning office for Chapter 2.12 or consult the municipal code online.
Will the Architecture and Design Review Board always be the decision maker?
No — the ADRB commonly reviews and recommends, but the code provides for council review in certain cases (e.g., homes >8,000 sq ft per § 17.32.040), and some approvals/appeals procedures are channeled to the council or to staff depending on the type of review under Chapter 2.12. Check Chapter 2.12 for the precise delegation.
Do Hillsborough design standards reference Title 24/building code requirements?
Substantive design review addresses aesthetics and zoning development standards in Title 17. Building code compliance (California Building Standards / Title 24) remains a separate requirement for structural, fire, and life‑safety approvals and is referenced where relevant (for example ADU building/sprinkler/occupancy rules); see ADU and building‑safety cross‑references in § 17.52.020. For building‑code specifics consult the California Building Standards Code (Title 24). ---
More in Hillsborough code
Ask about any Hillsborough property
Get a cited, plain-English answer on Hillsborough zoning, setbacks, FAR, ADUs and permits — for any address.
Start Free TrialMore Hillsborough zoning topics
Hillsborough Zoning
Hillsborough Land Use
Hillsborough Development Standards
Hillsborough Parking
Hillsborough Overlay Districts
Hillsborough Historic Preservation
Hillsborough Signage
Hillsborough Nonconforming Uses
Hillsborough Variances and Exceptions
Hillsborough Landscaping and Screening
Hillsborough overview