Local zoning · El Segundo

El Segundo — Design Review

Design Review under the El Segundo local zoning and planning code, with the controlling citations.

Last reviewed: July 2, 2026

Overview

El Segundo does not have a single stand‑alone “Design Review” chapter titled as such; the zoning code channels architectural and site design review primarily through Site Plan Review and through plan/specific‑plan controls (notably the Downtown and Smoky Hollow specific plans). The Planning Commission and the Community Development Director share review authority depending on the application type and thresholds. The key local rules that drive “design review” outcomes are § 15‑25‑1 through § 15‑25‑4 (Site Plan Review), the Director’s discretionary authority in § 15‑23‑1, and the hearing procedures in § 15‑28‑2 and following.

Note: this page only covers what the El Segundo Zoning Code (Title 15 / “ZONING CODE”) says about design / site / architectural review. For building code issues see the California Building Standards Code.

How El Segundo organizes design review (short synthesis)

The City treats design review as part of discretionary land‑use permitting. The principal device is Site Plan Review: projects that meet certain size/density thresholds must obtain a Site Plan Review, evaluated by the Planning Commission (findings and standards in § 15‑25‑1 – § 15‑25‑4) .
Some design review authority is delegated to the Director for administrative decisions, including Downtown design review per the Downtown Specific Plan (see § 15‑23‑1(D)) .
Public hearings and appeal routes are set out in Chapter 28; certain applications (including Site Plan Review and Downtown Design Review) typically go to the Planning Commission (see § 15‑28‑2) .

When this page below cites a requirement, the controlling code section is shown (example: § 15‑25‑2) and the ordinance text used for interpretation is from the retrieved zoning code. Verify parcel‑specific requirements with the Community Development Director.

District‑by‑district design review notes (where the zoning code ties design controls to zones)

Below are the El Segundo zoning districts and the local code sections that materially affect how design or site plan review is applied in each. Each district name and numerical standards are shown in bold; controlling sections are cited.

R‑1 (Single‑Family Residential) — where most homeowner projects start

Purpose / where it applies: the R‑1 zone is described in Article 15‑4B and governs single‑family lots citywide; development standards and lot/yard rules appear under Article 15‑4B.
Typical permitted uses: single‑family dwellings and limited accessory structures per Article 15‑4A and 15‑4B. Not all accessory work triggers discretionary review; see Site Plan Review thresholds.
Key dimensional standards / development controls cited in the code: off‑street parking provisions in § 15‑4B‑5, signage rules in § 15‑4B‑6, and vehicular access/driveway geometry in § 15‑4B‑7 (these affect application completeness and the site plan materials required).
Design review trigger: only projects that meet the Site Plan Review thresholds (for example multifamily or large project thresholds) are automatically discretionary; otherwise review is ministerial unless referred. See § 15‑25‑2.

R‑2 (Two‑Family Residential) — duplex and small multi units

Purpose: R‑2 is Article 15‑4C and provides for single‑ and two‑family development consistent with the General Plan.
Typical uses: the R‑1 uses plus two‑family dwellings; accessory dwelling rules are regulated elsewhere (and ADUs have specific state/local rules).
Key standards: minimum lot area 10,000 sq ft for some multi‑unit categories, setback and height requirements listed in § 15‑4C‑3; landscaping and parking references in that article affect the site plan submittal.
Design review trigger: same citywide site‑plan thresholds (see § 15‑25‑2). Where objective standards apply to ADUs, the R‑2 rules interact with ADU law — confirm with the City (see El Segundo ADUs).

R‑3 / Multi‑Family Residential (multi‑unit standards referenced in the Title) — larger multi‑family

Purpose / application: multi‑family rules and open‑space requirements are referenced through the multi‑family articles (code cross‑references appear in adjustment rules) — e.g., open‑space / landscaping dimensions for multi‑family are tied to the R‑3 standards cited by the code (see § 15‑22‑4(B)(8) referencing the R‑3 open‑space rules).
Design review trigger: any multi‑family project exceeding the Site Plan Review thresholds (e.g., more than 10 units triggers site plan review) per § 15‑25‑2(A‑B).

MU‑N (Urban Mixed Use North) — higher‑intensity mixed use north areas

Purpose: MU‑N implements Urban Mixed Use North policies (Article 15‑5F) intended for mixed commercial/residential/office formats.
Typical uses: mixed commercial, office, retail, and residential types (per Article 15‑5A listing).
Key dimensional standards: minimum lot frontage 100 ft, FAR 1.3:1, height and setbacks spelled out in § 15‑5F‑3 (setbacks: front 20 ft, side 10 ft typical; building area/FAR limits specified). These are the standards the Site Plan Review findings must show consistency with.
Applicability to design review: MU‑N projects of significant size commonly trigger Site Plan Review or other discretionary review; the overall findings in § 15‑25‑4 require consistency with the zone’s objective design standards.

MU‑S (Urban Mixed Use South) — higher‑rise, mixed use south areas

Purpose: MU‑S is Article 15‑5G and anticipates a mix of commercial, hotel, office, retail and other higher intensity uses.
Typical uses: retail, services, office, research & development, hotels, theaters — and mixed‑use buildings containing multiple types of uses.
Key dimensional standards and design controls: minimum lot area 10,000 sq ft, maximum height (varies, some limits to 175 ft in specific areas), FAR and other site development standards are in § 15‑5G‑3; MU‑S allows certain architectural projections into setbacks with conditions (for example limited projections referenced elsewhere). These standards are the baseline for design consistency findings.
Design review pathway: large projects will be subject to Site Plan Review (Planning Commission) and Downtown/District‑level specific plan controls if within a specific plan area.

Overlay Districts: Mixed‑Use Overlay, Housing Overlay, Smoky Hollow, Downtown Specific Plan

The code uses overlays and specific plans to add design rules. For example, the Mixed‑Use Overlay has sign and access rules (§ 15‑7C) and the Housing Overlay sets its own height, setback and open‑space rules (§ 15‑7D‑2).
The Smoky Hollow Specific Plan and its MDR overlay are referenced in the code (activation rules and design rules appear in Chapter 15‑7A) — the Smoky Hollow plan contains site‑specific design rules that feed into Site Plan Review findings (see § 15‑7A).
The Downtown Specific Plan contains Downtown Design Review procedures; the zoning code delegates Downtown Design Review to the Director per § 15‑23‑1(D) and reserves Planning Commission review where the Specific Plan requires a hearing (§ 15‑28‑2). The actual Downtown design standards are in the Downtown Specific Plan (not reproduced in the retrieved zoning snippets).

Core decision standards and rules (table)

What an approver looks at / triggers	Key rule or threshold	Code reference
When Site Plan Review is required (size/density triggers)	Single‑family > 10 units; Multi‑family > 10 units; new nonresidential > 50,000 sq ft; additions cumulatively > 50,000 sq ft	§ 15‑25‑2
Who decides Site Plan Review	Generally the Planning Commission (subject to Chapter 28 hearing rules)	§ 15‑25‑3 and § 15‑28‑2
Findings the approver must make (design & infrastructure)	Consistency with development standards & objective design standards; no adverse public‑health/safety impacts; consistent architectural style on all sides; adequate infrastructure	§ 15‑25‑4(A–E)
Administrative (Director) discretionary review list (includes Downtown design review)	Director may make administrative decisions on adjustments, administrative permits, and Downtown design review as set out in the Downtown Specific Plan	§ 15‑23‑1
Adjustment authority (limited deviations)	Director may grant adjustments to fence heights, architectural landscape features, sign limits, parking, small height exceptions up to 5 ft, etc., with findings	§ 15‑22‑4
Parking plan requirement tied to permits	Parking/location/layout plan must be submitted and the City will not issue a building permit until parking is shown compliant	§ 15‑15‑4

How the code ties design review to other topic areas (internal links)

The Site Plan Review findings require compliance with local development standards and objective design standards; see El Segundo Development Standards (consistency is required by § 15‑25‑4) .
Parking and loading plans are a routine submittal item for discretionary design review and are required before permits are issued — see El Segundo Parking and § 15‑15‑4 for plan preparation and permit approval.
Overlay and specific plan requirements (for example the Downtown Specific Plan or Smoky Hollow) may add separate design review procedures; see El Segundo Overlay Districts and § 15‑23‑1(D).
For projects affecting designated historic resources the Certificate of Appropriateness and historic review procedures are in Chapter 14 — see El Segundo Historic Preservation. The Planning Commission hears historic resource designations per § 15‑28‑2.
Site design usually must show landscaping/screening; see El Segundo Landscaping and Screening because landscape standards are invoked during design review (e.g., Multi‑Family/MU zones reference § 15‑2‑14 and chapter 15A).
ADUs: objective rules and limits on design review for ADUs are governed by state law; local ADU rules interact with discretionary processes — see El Segundo ADUs and the state ADU discussion (Not a substitute for verifying local code).

(Each linked topic above is the first natural mention of that topic and links to the El Segundo menu page requested.)

Checklist — what an applicant must prepare for projects that will face design/site review

Determine whether the project meets Site Plan Review triggers (§ 15‑25‑2)
Complete the City’s discretionary application forms and pay fees (Chapter 28 application routing rules) (§ 15‑28‑3)
Provide site plans showing building massing, setbacks, FAR, circulation, and materials/colors so the approver can make the findings in § 15‑25‑4 (consistency with zone/specific plan design standards)
Submit a parking/loading plan compliant with § 15‑15‑4 (no building permit until parking is shown) and include any off‑site parking covenants if used.
Provide landscape/irrigation plans where required (landscape chapter references and 15‑2‑14) and public‑realm improvements per § 15‑31‑4 (curb/sidewalk/parkway requirements ahead of final inspection)
If proposing adjustments or deviations, prepare findings and evidence for § 15‑22‑4 (administrative adjustments) or the variance/appeal pathways in Chapter 29/27 as applicable.
If within the Downtown Specific Plan or Smoky Hollow, obtain and follow the specific plan’s Downtown/Smoky Hollow design guidelines (Downtown Design Review may be administered by the Director; see § 15‑23‑1(D)).

Risks & Ambiguities

Issue	Why it matters	What to verify
Is “design review” a separate permit or part of Site Plan Review?	The City’s primary discretionary design control appears to be Site Plan Review; mis‑naming the process can cause incorrect routing and missed hearings.	Confirm whether your parcel falls under § 15‑25‑2 Site Plan Review triggers or under a Specific Plan’s separate Downtown Design Review (see § 15‑23‑1(D) and § 15‑25‑2)
Where are objective “design standards” used by reviewers?	Approvals require “consistency with…objective design standards” (a finding in § 15‑25‑4(A)); without a clear list the review can seem subjective.	Request the City’s objective design standards applicable to your zone/specific plan (not all objective standards are reproduced in the zoning excerpts here). Verify with the jurisdiction.
Downtown / Specific‑Plan rules vs. Title 15	Specific plans often add or override design rules; failure to read the specific plan will miss applicable standards (materials, fenestration, street‑level uses).	If in Downtown or Smoky Hollow get the Downtown Specific Plan or Smoky Hollow Specific Plan and confirm whether Downtown Design Review is administrative (Director) or Planning Commission per § 15‑23‑1(D) and § 15‑28‑2.
ADUs and design review	State ADU law limits discretionary design constraints for ADUs; local ADU standards must be objective.	For ADUs, check local ADU procedures and state rules; local code references ADU interactions but state law may preempt discretionary design review on some ADUs. See El Segundo ADUs and state guidance. Not all ADU‑specific rules are in the retrieved zoning snippets.
Historic resources	Alterations to historic properties may require Certificate of Appropriateness or separate historic review.	Confirm Chapter 14 historic resource procedures when properties are designated; Planning Commission hearings on historic designations are called for in § 15‑28‑2.

Plain‑English summary

If your project is big enough (e.g., more than 10 units or a commercial building over 50,000 sq ft) or is within a specific plan area, expect discretionary design review under El Segundo’s Site Plan Review rules; that review checks that massing, setbacks, landscaping, parking, and architectural treatment match the zone and any specific plan standards (see § 15‑25‑2 and § 15‑25‑4) . Small homeowner work that doesn't meet the thresholds is usually ministerial, but the Director can refer items (and the Downtown Specific Plan and overlays can impose separate design review), so always verify with the Community Development Director.

Source References

El Segundo Zoning Code — Site Plan Review: § 15‑25‑1 – § 15‑25‑4 (Site Plan Review purpose, applicability, authority, findings)
El Segundo Zoning Code — Director discretionary decisions (including Downtown design review): § 15‑23‑1(D)
El Segundo Zoning Code — Adjustment authority (administrative deviations): § 15‑22‑4
El Segundo Zoning Code — Public hearings / Planning Commission items (Site Plan Review; Downtown Design Review): § 15‑28‑2 – § 15‑28‑4
El Segundo Zoning Code — MU‑N (Urban Mixed Use North) standards and Site Development Standards: Article 15‑5F (see § 15‑5F‑1 – § 15‑5F‑5)
El Segundo Zoning Code — MU‑S (Urban Mixed Use South) standards and Site Development Standards: Article 15‑5G (see § 15‑5G‑1 – § 15‑5G‑3)
El Segundo Zoning Code — R‑1 and R‑2 zone excerpts and related site/parking/sign rules: Article 15‑4B and Article 15‑4C (see § 15‑4B‑5, § 15‑4B‑6, § 15‑4B‑7, § 15‑4C‑3)
El Segundo Zoning Code — Parking plan preparation and permit approval: § 15‑15‑4
El Segundo Zoning Code — Smoky Hollow and overlay activation / Mixed‑Use Overlay rules: Chapter 15‑7 (Overlays) and § 15‑7A (MDR/Smoky Hollow references)
State guidance (ADUs and interaction with local design standards): 2025 ADU guidance (handbook excerpt) — for how state ADU law constrains local design review (not a substitute for local code)

Sources

Retrieved passages

El Segundo Zoning Code (CHAPTER 25) High relevance
El Segundo Zoning Code (Chapter 28) High relevance
El Segundo Zoning Code (Chapter 29.) Medium relevance
El Segundo Zoning Code (chapter as) Medium relevance
El Segundo Zoning Code (title related) Medium relevance
El Segundo Zoning Code (chapter and) Medium relevance
El Segundo Zoning Code (chapter subject) Medium relevance
El Segundo Zoning Code (Chapter shall) Medium relevance
El Segundo Zoning Code (Chapter shall) Medium relevance
El Segundo Zoning Code (section 15-2-3) Medium relevance
El Segundo Zoning Code (Chapter to) Medium relevance
El Segundo Zoning Code (CHAPTER 28) Medium relevance
El Segundo Zoning Code (title or) Medium relevance
El Segundo Zoning Code (chapter 2) Medium relevance
El Segundo Zoning Code (Section 66001) Medium relevance
El Segundo Zoning Code (title related) Medium relevance
CBC § 15 (article 15-4E) Medium relevance
El Segundo Zoning Code Medium relevance

Cited sections

Official El Segundo code library

Frequently asked questions

Do I need design review in El Segundo?

If your project meets the Site Plan Review thresholds (for example a residential project of more than 10 units or new nonresidential construction with combined gross floor area over 50,000 sq ft), it must go through Site Plan Review and the Planning Commission will generally review it; those thresholds are in § 15‑25‑2 and the findings are in § 15‑25‑4. For smaller projects the Director can still exercise discretion or refer items, and Downtown/Specific Plan areas may have separate downtown design review rules.

What are the Site Plan Review findings the City will require?

To approve a site plan the approval authority must find that the project’s physical location, size, massing, setbacks, and placement are consistent with the applicable development and objective design standards; the project is consistent with the General Plan; there is no specific adverse health/safety impact; a consistent architectural style is used on all sides; and public infrastructure is adequate. These are listed in § 15‑25‑4.

Where are Downtown design review rules found?

The code delegates Downtown Design Review to the Director and ties Downtown Design Review to the Downtown Specific Plan (the zoning code references Downtown Design Review in § 15‑23‑1(D) and the Planning Commission hearing list in § 15‑28‑2). The detailed standards and procedures are in the Downtown Specific Plan (see the Specific Plan text — not all Downtown Specific Plan material was included in the retrieved zoning excerpts).

What are the numerical triggers for design/site review?

The primary numerical triggers in the zoning code are: single‑family developments of more than 10 units, multi‑family developments of more than 10 units, new commercial/institutional/industrial structures with combined gross floor area over 50,000 sq ft, and additions exceeding 50,000 sq ft — all in § 15‑25‑2.

Can the Community Development Director decide design exceptions?

Yes — the Director has authority to make administrative decisions on adjustments and certain discretionary permits (the Director’s jurisdiction list includes Downtown design review, adjustments, administrative use permits, etc.) under § 15‑23‑1; adjustments to development standards are governed by § 15‑22‑4 (with required findings).

How does parking factor into design review (what will reviewers check)?

Parking layout and proof of required parking must be submitted as part of plan review — the City will not issue a building permit until parking and loading facilities required by Chapter 15 are shown and maintained per § 15‑15‑4. Parking adjustments may be administratively reviewed or referred to the Planning Commission depending on the nature of the request.

If my lot is in the Smoky Hollow or other overlay, how does that change design review?

Overlays and specific plans (for example Smoky Hollow or Mixed‑Use Overlay) add or alter development standards and can change whether a project is ministerial or discretionary; the code includes activation and overlay rules in Chapter 15‑7 and refers to the specific plans directly, so you must apply the overlay/specific plan design rules in addition to Title 15 rules. See § 15‑7A and related overlay sections.

Are ADU approvals subject to design review in El Segundo?

Local ADU rules must comply with state ADU law. The state allows objective development and design standards that permit ministerial ADU approvals; local ADU standards and whether an ADU is subject to discretionary design review depend on how the City calibrated its ADU rules. For local interaction with state ADU law, consult the City’s ADU rules and the state guidance referenced in the ADU handbook (not all ADU specifics are in the zoning snippets retrieved).

What happens if the findings in § 15‑25‑4 cannot be made?

If the required findings for Site Plan Review cannot be made, the site plan shall be denied per § 15‑25‑4; applicants can appeal Planning Commission decisions under the appeal procedures in Chapters 25/27/28 as applicable.

Who should I contact to confirm which design standards apply to my parcel?

Verify with the City’s Community Development Department (Director of Community Development) — the Director enforces Title 15 and decides administrative referrals; when in doubt, ask for an intake meeting and request the applicable specific plan/design standards and a list of objective standards the plan reviewer will use (See § 15‑1‑4 and § 15‑23‑1). ---

Ask about any El Segundo property

Get a cited, plain-English answer on El Segundo zoning, setbacks, FAR, ADUs and permits — for any address.

Start Free Trial