Local zoning · Daly City
Daly City — Design Review
Design Review under the Daly City local zoning and planning code, with the controlling citations.
Last reviewed: July 2, 2026
Overview
Design review in Daly City is a discrete, ordinance-driven process that controls exterior building, site, and sign appearance where the city’s zoning code requires review. The city’s Design Review chapter establishes who reviews projects (city planner, design review committee, planning commission, or city council), what must be submitted, the findings required for approval, and appeal/expiration/enforcement rules. See the city’s zoning rules for where design review applies and how it interacts with objective design standards and combining districts. § 17.45.010
Note: the word “design review” in this page links to Daly City’s zoning menu where the process and permit triggers are documented: Daly City Zoning (/us/california/daly-city/zoning).
How this page is organized
- First, the ordinance-level rules that control design review (who decides, thresholds, submittal list, required findings, conditions, appeals and enforcement). Key controlling sections are summarized and cited.
- Second, a district-by-district breakdown showing the common zones where design review frequently appears and the code sections you’ll check for dimensional standards.
- Third, practical checklists, risks, and a plain-English homeowner summary.
Core Daly City design review rules (what the code actually says)
Who/what body: A Design Review Committee is established to review projects not processed concurrently with other approvals; the committee’s authority and appointment are set out in § 17.45.020. When design review is required alongside another discretionary application, the city council or planning commission may make the findings; the committee’s decision is final unless appealed. § 17.45.020
Pre-permit requirement: No building permit or authorization for exterior construction, reconstruction or exterior alteration may be issued for projects where design review/site plan review is required until the design/site plan is approved. § 17.45.070
Application and submittal content: Applications must be filed on a city form and include property description, owner/applicant, project description and other information the city planner requires. Required supporting materials include a scaled site plan, grading, parking layout, setbacks, elevations, color/material descriptions, exterior appurtenances, lighting, signs, and a landscape plan complying with Chapter 17.41. § 17.45.050 and § 17.45.060
Findings required to approve: To approve a design review or site plan the reviewer must find (1) the chapter and applicable guidelines are complied with, (2) the approval is in the public interest, (3) site layout and circulation, setbacks, heights and safety create a desirable environment, (4) architectural character, materials, colors and screening create compatibility with surroundings, and (5) landscaping consistent with Chapter 17.41 is provided. § 17.45.080
Conditions, denial, and enforcement: The approving body may impose conditions to protect the neighborhood and public welfare; denial must be based on inability to make the findings in § 17.45.080. Failure to comply with conditions is a code violation; permits may expire after one year if not “used” (i.e., building permit obtained and construction commenced). §§ 17.45.090, 17.45.100, 17.45.140, 17.45.150
Applicability (major vs. minor review): The code distinguishes “major design review” projects that must go to the design review committee (examples: residential projects of four or more units; new commercial buildings >2,000 sq ft or lots ≥2,500 sq ft). See § 17.45.120 for the applicability thresholds. § 17.45.120
Objective Design Standards (ODS) & conformity review: For areas and project types governed by the city’s ODS (objective, measurable rules), projects must undergo a pre‑building‑permit conformity review with planning staff not less than 180 days prior to building permit submission. The planning division must respond with written findings within 45 days and applicants have resubmittal timelines; failure to address recommendations can block permit release. See § 17.58.110 and § 17.58.100 (Mission Street / C‑MU corridor ODS examples). §§ 17.58.110, 17.58.100
Design guidelines and non-discretionary review: Where a discretionary permit is required, the decision body evaluates compliance with adopted design guidelines; if discretionary review is not required, building plans are still checked by the planning division for compliance with design guidelines and may be disapproved if not in compliance. § 17.35.030
Combining / overlay districts: Several combining districts impose additional design review triggers (for example S‑1 Design Review Combining District and the -B BART Station Area Combining District both require design review or apply additional criteria). See § 17.26.010–050 and § 17.29.060. §§ 17.26.010–050, 17.29.060
District-by-district breakdown (where design review normally appears and the base standards to check)
Below are district summaries focused on design-review relevance and the local code sections you must consult. Bolded district names are the zoning labels used in Daly City’s Title 17.
R-1 (single‑family residential): Purpose — preserve single‑family character; typical permitted uses — detached single‑family homes and accessory uses (including ADUs under state and local ADU rules). Key dimensional rules affecting design review include minimum lot area per dwelling and lot coverage (see § 17.38.060 for lot area per dwelling and § 17.38.070 for maximum lot coverage). If exterior changes are visible from public right-of-way and meet design-review triggers, plans must comply with the design guidelines in Chapter 17.35 and submit required materials under § 17.45.060. §§ 17.38.060, 17.38.070, 17.35.020‑030, 17.45.060
R-1/A (single‑family / duplex overlay with design protections): Purpose — protect existing neighborhoods and allow duplexes while controlling visual impacts. Typical standards include minimum lot area 2,500 sq ft, maximum height 30 ft, minimum front yard 15 ft, maximum lot coverage 55%. See § 17.09.050 for these yard/coverage/height rules; design review requirements follow Chapter 17.45. § 17.09.050, § 17.45.010
R-2 (two‑family): Purpose — permit duplexes/low‑density multi‑family; permitted uses include R‑1 uses plus two‑family dwellings. See § 17.10.010 for the uses table and dimensional rules (height up to 36 ft in many cases; lot coverage and lot area per unit standards apply). Design review applies when projects meet Chapter 17.45 triggers or specific-plan/overlay rules. § 17.10.010, § 17.45.120
R‑H / R‑L (Residential High/Low Density): Higher‑density zones have specific density, height and floor‑area rules and often require design review for multi‑unit developments. See the local zone tables and § 17.38.020–070 for open‑space and lot‑coverage/density rules, and apply Chapter 17.45 findings for multi‑unit projects. § 17.38.020–070, § 17.45.080
C‑MU (Mission Street Corridor – Commercial Mixed‑Use): Purpose — corridor mixed‑use with objective design standards and a mandatory conformity review process for new construction; typical uses — mixed residential, retail and office per the Mission Street plan. Key standards: maximum height up to 15 stories / 175 ft (measurement rules and limited mechanical/elevator exceptions apply), minimum lot area for subdivision 10,000 sq ft, minimum lot coverage 50%, minimum front sidewalk widths and lot‑coverage/open‑space rules. For projects subject to ODS, follow the conformity review timeline (180 days prior to building permit, 45‑day response, re‑submittal timelines). See §§ 17.58.040–110 for the C‑MU rules and ODS process. §§ 17.58.040, 17.58.050, 17.58.060, 17.58.080, 17.58.100, 17.58.110
BOC (BART Office Commercial) and C‑R/R (Residential Retail Commercial): Commercial and mixed‑use districts list permitted uses and dimensional tables (see § 17.17.010 for BOC and the applicable C‑R/R table in the zoning tables). Design review is typically required for new construction or exterior remodeling visible to the public, and specific‑plan areas (like BART station area) add additional design guidelines. § 17.17.010, 17.29.060
OS (Open Space) and Planned Development / Specific Plan areas: In combining districts like -B (BART) or -RP resource protection, additional design review triggers and specific standards apply; the combining district language specifies whether design review is required and which plan or guidelines govern (e.g., the BART Station Area Specific Plan requires design review per § 17.29.060). §§ 17.29.010–060, 17.28.030
Note: for any parcel, “Verify with the jurisdiction” — some properties fall into multiple overlays or specific plans, and the underlying district rules interact with combining-district rules (combining district rules may prevail where inconsistent). See the overlay district chapter and the specific district text. § 17.26.020
Quick reference table — decision‑relevant design review standards
| Topic | Rule / Threshold | Code Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Major design review triggers (examples) | Residential projects of 4+ units; new commercial buildings >2,000 sq ft or lot ≥2,500 sq ft require major design review | § 17.45.120 |
| Required approval findings | Compliance with chapter/guidelines; public interest; site considerations (layout, parking, setbacks); architectural considerations; landscaping per Chapter 17.41 | § 17.45.080 |
| Submittal essentials | Scaled site plan, elevations, materials/colors, parking layout, grading, fences/walls, landscape plan (Chapter 17.41) | § 17.45.060, § 17.41.010 |
| Objective Design Standards (ODS) conformity | 180‑day pre‑BP conformity review; planning division responds 45 days; re‑submittal 30 days; applicant may appeal staff recommendations to council | § 17.58.110, § 17.58.100 |
| Permit expiration | Design review permit expires 1 year if not used; extensions up to 6 months possible by reviewing body | § 17.45.150 |
| Enforcement | Failure to comply with conditions is a violation of the title and subject to penalties under Chapter 17.50 | § 17.45.140, § 17.50.020 |
Checklist (what an applicant must have or do before submitting)
- Confirm whether your parcel is within an overlay or combining district (for example S‑1, -B BART, Mission Street C‑MU) and follow additional design standards if so; see overlay rules. § 17.26.020, 17.29.060
- Determine whether the project is a “major design review” per § 17.45.120 (e.g., 4+ units, commercial >2,000 sq ft) and which reviewing body will decide. § 17.45.120
- Prepare full application on city form and the items listed in § 17.45.060: site plan, dimensions, parking layout, ingress/egress, grading, elevations, materials/colors, lighting, signage, appurtenances, and landscape plan complying with Chapter 17.41. §§ 17.45.050–060, 17.41.010
- If located in an ODS area (e.g., C‑MU Mission Street), submit a conformity review package to planning staff ≥180 days before anticipated building permit. § 17.58.110
- Budget for possible conditions of approval, public noticing and appeals; be prepared to respond to planning staff recommendations within the 30/45‑day re‑submittal windows. § 17.58.110
- Track permit “use” deadlines (1‑year automatic termination rule) and request extension early if needed. § 17.45.150
Note: This page links to Daly City Development Standards (/us/california/daly-city/development-standards) for the reader’s first check of setbacks and dimensional rules and to Daly City Parking (/us/california/daly-city/parking) for off‑street parking rules referenced in submittal requirements. If you are preparing an ADU application, consult Daly City ADUs (/us/california/daly-city/adu) and state ADU law guidance. Large projects should also reference the California Building Standards Code (/us/california/building-codes) for separate building code compliance.
Risks & Ambiguities
| Issue | Why it matters | What to verify |
|---|---|---|
| Overlay/specific plan precedence | Combining districts (S‑1, -B, BART, Mission Street) may impose extra design requirements or override base zone rules | Verify which overlays or specific plans apply to the parcel and read overlay sections (e.g., § 17.26., § 17.29.) |
| Which body decides (planner vs. committee vs. council) | Different bodies have different review timelines and appeal paths; being in the wrong pathway delays project | Confirm reviewing body per § 17.45.020 and § 17.45.120; ask planning staff early |
| Objective vs. discretionary standards | ODS (objective) projects follow a formal conformity review timeline; discretionary guideline reviews are more subjective | Determine whether ODS applies (e.g., C‑MU ODS per § 17.58.110) and follow the 180/45/30 day timelines; otherwise expect discretionary guideline review under § 17.35.030 |
| ADU interaction | State ADU law limits local standards that can block ADUs; local design review requirements may not lawfully preclude compliant ADUs | Verify ADU-specific procedures with Daly City ADU rules and state ADU law; local code references in Title 17 apply but are constrained by state law. "Verify with the jurisdiction." Not found in retrieved materials for parcel‑specific ADU triggers. |
| Landscaping / water rules | Landscape plan requirements are enforced by Chapter 17.41 and may involve water‑conservation standards | Confirm landscape scope and submittal requirements under § 17.45.060(C) and Chapter 17.41 (water conservation) before submittal. § 17.45.060, § 17.41.010 |
Plain-English Summary
If your project changes a building or site appearance that others can see (new building, big addition, exterior remodel, new signage or visible mechanical equipment), Daly City’s zoning code often makes you file a design review or site plan — the city will require scaled plans, elevations, colors/materials, landscaping, and parking info, and a reviewer must be able to make specified findings before approval. The code lists which projects automatically need “major” review (for example, most 4+ unit residential projects and larger commercial buildings) and includes a special conformity review process for areas covered by objective design standards such as the Mission Street corridor. §§ 17.45.060, 17.45.080, 17.45.120, 17.58.110
Source References
- Daly City Municipal Code — Design Review Chapter: § 17.45.010 – § 17.45.160 (purpose, powers, applications, required data, procedures, findings, conditions, denial, expiration, enforcement).
- Required submittal detail for design/site plans: § 17.45.060.
- Design guidelines / property development and maintenance: Chapter 17.35, including § 17.35.020–040 (design guideline applicability, property development standards, appeals).
- S‑1 Design Review Combining District: § 17.26.010–070 (purpose, combining rules, criteria, appeals).
- BART Station Area Combining District (design review required there): § 17.29.010–070, especially § 17.29.060.
- C‑MU (Mission Street Corridor) objective design standards and conformity review rules: §§ 17.58.040–110 (height, lot area/width, lot coverage, yard rules, ODS conformity).
- Lot area, coverage and density rules affecting residential districts: Chapter 17.38, including § 17.38.040, § 17.38.060, § 17.38.070.
- R‑2 district table and rules: § 17.10.010.
- Permit enforcement and expiration rules referenced: §§ 17.45.140, 17.45.150 and enforcement chapter 17.50.
Sources
Retrieved passages
- Daly City Zoning Code (§ 1) High relevance
- Daly City Zoning Code (chapter and) High relevance
- Daly City Zoning Code (Chapter 17.41) High relevance
- Daly City Zoning Code (Chapter 17.41) High relevance
- Daly City Zoning Code (§ 5) High relevance
- Daly City Zoning Code (§ 6) High relevance
- Daly City Zoning Code (chapter to) High relevance
- Daly City Zoning Code (§ 1) High relevance
- Daly City Zoning Code (Section 65583.2) Medium relevance
- Daly City Zoning Code (§ 20.5) Medium relevance
- Daly City Zoning Code (Section 17.42.060) Medium relevance
- Daly City Zoning Code (§ 15.3) Medium relevance
- Daly City Zoning Code (§ 1) Medium relevance
- Daly City Zoning Code (Section 17.40.040) Medium relevance
- Daly City Zoning Code (§ 15.3) Medium relevance
Cited sections
- Daly City Municipal Code — Design Review Chapter: **§ 17.45.010 – § 17.45.160** (purpose, powers, applications, required data, procedures, findings, conditions, denial, expiration, enforcement). (§ 17.45.010)
- Required submittal detail for design/site plans: **§ 17.45.060**. (§ 17.45.060)
- Design guidelines / property development and maintenance: **Chapter 17.35**, including **§ 17.35.020–040** (design guideline applicability, property development standards, appeals). (Chapter 17.35)
- S‑1 Design Review Combining District: **§ 17.26.010–070** (purpose, combining rules, criteria, appeals). (§ 17.26.010)
- BART Station Area Combining District (design review required there): **§ 17.29.010–070**, especially **§ 17.29.060**. (§ 17.29.010)
- C‑MU (Mission Street Corridor) objective design standards and conformity review rules: **§§ 17.58.040–110** (height, lot area/width, lot coverage, yard rules, ODS conformity). (§ 17.58.040)
- Lot area, coverage and density rules affecting residential districts: **Chapter 17.38**, including **§ 17.38.040, § 17.38.060, § 17.38.070**. (Chapter 17.38)
- R‑2 district table and rules: **§ 17.10.010**. (§ 17.10.010)
- Permit enforcement and expiration rules referenced: **§§ 17.45.140, 17.45.150** and enforcement chapter **17.50**. (§ 17.45.140)
- DalyCity_ZoningCode.md
- 2025 California ADU handbook.md
Frequently asked questions
Do I need design review in Daly City for a single‑family home addition?
If the addition is an exterior alteration visible from the public right-of-way and the project meets design‑review triggers, yes — plans must be submitted and approved before a building permit can be issued. The code requires submittal of exterior elevations, materials/colors and site plans per § 17.45.060 and the planning division will apply Chapter 17.35 design guidelines where applicable. §§ 17.45.060, 17.35.020–030
What counts as a “major” design review project in Daly City?
Examples listed in the ordinance include residential projects of four or more dwelling units and new commercial buildings that exceed 2,000 sq ft or are on sites 2,500 sq ft or greater — these are treated as major design review requiring committee review. See § 17.45.120 for the code triggers. § 17.45.120
What must I include in a design review application?
At minimum, the city requires a completed application form plus the scaled site plan (property lines, existing/off‑site features within 50 ft, proposed buildings, parking, ingress/egress, setbacks, grading), building elevations (materials/colors), landscape plan (Chapter 17.41), and other data the planner requires. See § 17.45.050–060. §§ 17.45.050–060, 17.41.010
If my property is in the Mission Street corridor (C‑MU), is there a special review path?
Yes — the Mission Street C‑MU district deploys Objective Design Standards and a formal conformity review process: submit conformity materials ≥180 days before building permit, expect a written response within 45 days, and use the re‑submittal windows if needed. See § 17.58.110 and related C‑MU rules. § 17.58.110
Can design review require changes to parking or setbacks?
Design review evaluates site layout and parking as part of the findings (vehicular access/circulation and parking are explicit factors). Any required changes must be justified by the findings and conditions of approval, and off‑street parking rules from Chapter 17.34 still apply. Check Chapter 17.45 findings and Chapter 17.34 for parking standards. § 17.45.080
How long does a design review approval last?
A design review permit expires automatically if not “used” within one year from the date of approval (“used” means obtaining a building permit and commencing construction). Extensions up to six months may be granted by the reviewing body upon written request. § 17.45.150
Can I appeal a design review denial or condition?
Yes. Appeal pathways depend on the reviewing body: the design review committee decision may be appealed to the city council, and planner decisions can be appealed to the planning commission following the appeal rules in the code. See § 17.45.020 and the appeal sections in the combining‑district and planner decision rules. § 17.45.020, § 17.26.060
Are there special design rules for the BART Station area?
Yes — the BART Station Area Combining District implements the BART Station Area Specific Plan and requires a design review permit for all new construction and exterior remodeling in that district. See § 17.29.060. § 17.29.060
If my project is only interior work, do I need design review?
Interior work that does not change exterior appearance or site layout generally is not subject to design review; the code explicitly limits Chapter 17.35 applicability to exterior alterations and new construction visible to the public. Verify with the planning division for borderline cases. § 17.35.020
Where do I find the rules for landscaping required with design review?
Landscape plans must comply with Chapter 17.41 (Water Conservation in Landscaping and associated submittal and maintenance requirements), and § 17.45.060(C) requires landscape plan submission as part of design review. §§ 17.45.060, 17.41.010
More in Daly City code
Ask about any Daly City property
Get a cited, plain-English answer on Daly City zoning, setbacks, FAR, ADUs and permits — for any address.
Start Free Trial