Local zoning · Beverly Hills
Beverly Hills — Historic Preservation
Historic Preservation under the Beverly Hills local zoning and planning code, with the controlling citations.
Last reviewed: July 1, 2026
Overview
Beverly Hills administers historic preservation through the Cultural Heritage provisions of the Beverly Hills Municipal Code, located in Title 10, Chapter 3. These provisions establish the role of the City’s Cultural Heritage Commission (CHC), spell out how landmarks and historic districts are designated, and require specific project-level approvals—most notably a Certificate of Appropriateness—for work on designated resources. In practice, preservation actions layer onto the underlying Beverly Hills Zoning and Land Use rules rather than replace them, and projects still must satisfy applicable Development Standards and any required Design Review.
How Beverly Hills administers Historic Preservation
- Cultural Heritage decision-makers and applications
- The CHC recommends to the City Council on proposed landmark and historic district designations, and on Mills Act contracts; it also acts on Certificates of Appropriateness, Certificates of Economic Hardship, and Certificates of Ineligibility (code cross-references in the City’s noticing table cite these sections: designation at §10-3-3215, certificate of appropriateness at §10-3-3219, hardship at §10-3-3220, ineligibility at §10-3-3221).
- Certain cultural heritage determinations can be handled administratively by the Director (e.g., a Certificate of Review for a District Non-Contributor and a Director’s determination of ineligibility) per the same table in §10-3-253.
- Public notice
- Cultural heritage applications follow the City’s general Notification Requirements in §10-3-253; the table there points applicants to the operative sections for each preservation action (e.g., §10-3-3219 for Certificates of Appropriateness). Verify the exact mailed radius and posting requirements for the specific cultural heritage action by referencing the applicable section or the City’s public notice guidelines.
- Underlying zoning and uses
- Preservation decisions do not independently authorize uses or development outside what the underlying zoning permits; conformance to zone regulations is still required under §10-3-203.
What approvals exist (and when they apply)
- Landmark or Historic District designation (City Council action on CHC recommendation) — see §10-3-3215 reference in §10-3-253.
- Certificate of Appropriateness (CHC action) for work on designated landmarks and contributing properties — see §10-3-3219 reference in §10-3-253.
- Certificate of Economic Hardship (CHC action) — see §10-3-3220 reference in §10-3-253.
- Certificate of Ineligibility (CHC action) — see §10-3-3221 reference in §10-3-253.
- Director-level cultural heritage actions: Certificate of Review for a District Non-Contributor and Director’s determination of ineligibility — as indicated in §10-3-253.
District-by-district breakdown (how preservation overlays underlying districts)
Historic designation functions as a layer on top of standard districts like R-1.X, R-2, R-4, C-3, etc. Use, height, FAR, setbacks, and similar metrics continue to be governed by the underlying district unless a separate, adopted plan says otherwise. Conformance to the underlying zone is required by §10-3-203.
Designated Landmarks (City Landmarks)
- Purpose: Recognize and protect individual resources with historic, architectural, or cultural significance.
- Typical permitted uses: Whatever the underlying district allows (e.g., a landmarked house in R-1.X remains a house). See §10-3-203 for conformity to zone regulations.
- Key dimensional standards: Governed by the underlying district; no additional dimensional standards were found in the retrieved materials specific to landmarks.
- Where it applies: Any property the City Council designates by action under the designation procedure referenced at §10-3-3215 in §10-3-253.
- Project approvals: Changes subject to a Certificate of Appropriateness under §10-3-3219 (as cited in §10-3-253).
Designated Historic Districts — Contributing Properties
- Purpose: Protect the collective character of areas where individual properties contribute to a district’s significance.
- Typical permitted uses: From the underlying zoning map/designation (e.g., R-2 for duplex-scaled residential, C-3 for commercial). §10-3-203 applies.
- Key dimensional standards: From the base zone; not replaced by cultural heritage status in the retrieved code.
- Where it applies: Properties formally included when the City Council designates a historic district under §10-3-3215 (as cross-referenced in §10-3-253).
- Project approvals: Alterations typically require a Certificate of Appropriateness per §10-3-3219 (cited in §10-3-253).
Designated Historic Districts — Non-Contributing Properties
- Purpose: Manage changes to non-contributors so they do not erode the district’s character.
- Typical permitted uses: Per the underlying zone; §10-3-203 governs.
- Key dimensional standards: Underlying zone controls.
- Where it applies: Properties within a designated historic district identified as non-contributing in the district record.
- Project approvals: A Certificate of Review for District Non-Contributor can be processed administratively by the Director (see cultural heritage row in §10-3-253).
Properties Found Ineligible (Certificate of Ineligibility)
- Purpose: Provide clarity when a site does not meet criteria for designation.
- Typical permitted uses: Underlying zoning applies; §10-3-203.
- Where it applies: Citywide, upon issuance of a Certificate of Ineligibility under §10-3-3221 (as cited in §10-3-253).
Pending Nominations; Economic Hardship Safety Valve
- Pending nominations: Public noticing and hearing processes apply per §10-3-253, which points to §10-3-3215 for designation. Confirm any interim protections during nomination with the City.
- Economic Hardship: Applicants may seek a Certificate of Economic Hardship under §10-3-3220 (as cited in §10-3-253).
Decision-relevant standards and approvals
| Topic | What it means in practice | Who decides | Code Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Landmark or Historic District Designation | Formal listing of a property or area | City Council on CHC recommendation | §10-3-3215 (cited in §10-3-253) |
| Certificate of Appropriateness (CoA) | Required approval for work on a Landmark or Contributing Property | CHC | §10-3-3219 (cited in §10-3-253) |
| Certificate of Economic Hardship | Relief mechanism if strict compliance would cause undue hardship | CHC | §10-3-3220 (cited in §10-3-253) |
| Certificate of Ineligibility | Confirms a property does not qualify for designation | CHC | §10-3-3221 (cited in §10-3-253) |
| Certificate of Review — District Non-Contributor | Administrative review path for non-contributing properties in districts | Director | §10-3-253 cultural heritage table |
| Notice of public hearing | Mailed/posted/newspaper notice per application type | As specified by application | §10-3-253 (Notification Requirements) |
| Underlying permitted uses | Preservation doesn’t expand uses; zoning still controls | Zoning districts (e.g., R-1.X, C-3) | §10-3-203 (Conformance to Zone Regulations) |
Interactions with other Beverly Hills approvals
- If a project also requires Design Review or Architectural Commission review, expect parallel processes; the cultural heritage references in §10-3-253 sit alongside those citywide procedures.
- Parking, loading, and other site standards continue to apply under Parking and related chapters, unless a duly adopted specific plan states otherwise. See general conformance in §10-3-203.
- Adding an ADU on a designated resource is allowed under state law, but a city may impose objective standards to prevent adverse impacts on listed historic resources; plan for cultural heritage review plus objective ADU standards. Not found in the retrieved Beverly Hills ordinance text; state guidance confirms this allowance.
Checklist
- Confirm whether your property is a designated Landmark, in a designated Historic District (and whether it is a contributor or non-contributor), or has been found ineligible.
- Scope the work: exterior vs interior; visible from the public way; demolition vs alteration; new construction within a district. Match the scope to the right approval (e.g., Certificate of Appropriateness for alterations to landmarks/contributors under §10-3-3219 as cited in §10-3-253).
- If you are a non-contributor in a district, coordinate with staff on a Director-level Certificate of Review pathway referenced in §10-3-253.
- If you believe designation criteria are not met, explore a Certificate of Ineligibility under §10-3-3221 (cited in §10-3-253).
- If compliance appears infeasible, discuss a Certificate of Economic Hardship under §10-3-3220 (cited in §10-3-253).
- Follow required public notice procedures in §10-3-253 and coordinate timelines with any concurrent Design Review or planning actions.
- Ensure your proposal still conforms to the underlying zoning district standards per §10-3-203.
Risks & Ambiguities
| Issue | Why it matters | What to verify |
|---|---|---|
| Scope triggering a CoA vs. Director-level review | The wrong filing can delay the project | Precisely whether your work requires a CHC-issued Certificate of Appropriateness under §10-3-3219 or a Director-level certificate for a district non-contributor per §10-3-253. |
| Notice radius and hearing format | Missing a noticing step can invalidate an approval | The applicable noticing procedure in §10-3-253 and any additional steps embedded within the section governing your specific application. |
| Interim protections during a nomination | Work may be restricted while a nomination is pending | Whether the City applies any interim controls pending Council action under §10-3-3215 (not detailed in retrieved materials). Verify with the jurisdiction. |
| Treatment of interiors | Some programs regulate exteriors only | Whether your approval scope includes interiors; not found in retrieved materials. Verify with the jurisdiction. |
| Interaction with Architectural Commission or DRC | Some projects need both cultural heritage and design/architectural review | Whether your project also needs Design Review or Architectural Commission review alongside CHC action; use §10-3-253 to map processes. |
| ADUs on historic properties | State law allows ADUs but protects historic resources | Objective standards to avoid adverse impacts on listed historic resources are allowed; confirm any local standards with the City. State guidance cited. |
Plain-English Summary
Beverly Hills protects historic places through a Cultural Heritage program administered by the CHC. If your property is a designated landmark or contributes to a historic district, most exterior changes need a CHC-issued Certificate of Appropriateness. Non-contributors in a district typically follow a Director-level review, and there are processes to confirm ineligibility or to claim economic hardship. Preservation approvals sit on top of the normal zoning rules—so your use, height, and setbacks still come from your base zone—and you may also need separate Design Review.
Source References
- BHMC Title 10, Chapter 3: Notification Requirements and Cultural Heritage application routing — §10-3-253 (references §§10-3-3215, 10-3-3219, 10-3-3220, 10-3-3221)
- BHMC Title 10, Chapter 3: Conformance to Zone Regulations — §10-3-203
- State guidance on ADUs and historic resources — California ADU Handbook (objective standards to prevent adverse impacts on listed historic resources)
Information Gaps
- The full operative language of §§10-3-3215, 10-3-3219, 10-3-3220, 10-3-3221 (designation criteria, detailed submittal requirements, decision findings, appeal processes) was not included in the retrieved excerpts. Not found in retrieved materials.
- Specific district names, maps, and contributor/non-contributor inventories were not included. Not found in retrieved materials.
- Any interim protections during nomination and whether interiors are regulated could not be confirmed. Not found in retrieved materials.
Sources
Retrieved passages
- Beverly Hills Zoning Code (section shall) Medium relevance
- Beverly Hills Zoning Code (section 10-3-3221) Medium relevance
- Beverly Hills Zoning Code (section 10-3-3219) Medium relevance
- Beverly Hills Zoning Code (chapter and) Medium relevance
- Beverly Hills Zoning Code (section shall) Medium relevance
- Beverly Hills Zoning Code (article 43) Medium relevance
- Beverly Hills Zoning Code (section shall) Medium relevance
- Beverly Hills Zoning Code (section 10-3-1551) Medium relevance
- CFC § 10 (chapter is) Medium relevance
- CBC § 18955 (Section 18955) Medium relevance
- Beverly Hills Zoning Code (section 10-3-1590) Medium relevance
- CBC § G106 (SECTION G106) Medium relevance
- Beverly Hills Zoning Code (§ 65915) Medium relevance
- Beverly Hills Zoning Code (chapter if) Medium relevance
Cited sections
- BHMC Title 10, Chapter 3: Notification Requirements and Cultural Heritage application routing — §10-3-253 (references §§10-3-3215, 10-3-3219, 10-3-3220, 10-3-3221) (Title 10)
- BHMC Title 10, Chapter 3: Conformance to Zone Regulations — §10-3-203 (Title 10)
- State guidance on ADUs and historic resources — California ADU Handbook (objective standards to prevent adverse impacts on listed historic resources)
- BeverlyHills_ZoningCode.md
- 2025 California ADU handbook.md
Frequently asked questions
Who approves a Certificate of Appropriateness in Beverly Hills?
The City’s Cultural Heritage Commission (CHC) acts on Certificates of Appropriateness for designated landmarks and contributing properties. The City’s noticing table points to §10-3-3219 for this approval. See §10-3-253 for process references.
How are Beverly Hills landmarks or historic districts designated?
The CHC recommends to the City Council, which takes final action on landmark and historic district designations. The City’s code points to §10-3-3215 for designation, as referenced in §10-3-253.
I’m in a historic district but my property is non-contributing—what review applies?
Non-contributors typically go through a Director-level Certificate of Review process, as indicated in the cultural heritage row of the City’s notification requirements (§10-3-253). Contributing properties require a Certificate of Appropriateness.
Is there an economic hardship path if preservation rules make my project infeasible?
Yes. Applicants can seek a Certificate of Economic Hardship, which the CHC acts on. The notification table cites §10-3-3220 for this process; see §10-3-253.
Do preservation approvals change what uses I’m allowed on my lot?
No. Preservation approvals don’t override the underlying zoning. Your uses and dimensional standards must still conform to your base district under §10-3-203.
Can I build an ADU on a designated historic property in Beverly Hills?
State law allows ADUs in historic areas, but cities may apply objective standards to prevent adverse impacts on listed resources. Expect both cultural heritage review and ADU compliance. This allowance is confirmed by state guidance.
Who decides if my property is ineligible for designation?
The CHC may issue a Certificate of Ineligibility; the Director may also make a determination of ineligibility administratively. See the cultural heritage section of the notice table in §10-3-253 and the citation to §10-3-3221.
Will I also need Design Review if my project is historic?
Possibly. Cultural heritage approvals often run in parallel with Design Review or Architectural Commission review for the same project scope. Use §10-3-253 to understand which processes apply to your case.
More in Beverly Hills code
Ask about any Beverly Hills property
Get a cited, plain-English answer on Beverly Hills zoning, setbacks, FAR, ADUs and permits — for any address.
Start Free TrialMore Beverly Hills zoning topics
Beverly Hills Zoning
Beverly Hills Land Use
Beverly Hills Development Standards
Beverly Hills Parking
Beverly Hills Design Review
Beverly Hills Overlay Districts
Beverly Hills Signage
Beverly Hills Nonconforming Uses
Beverly Hills Variances and Exceptions
Beverly Hills Landscaping and Screening
Beverly Hills overview