Earlier editions: 2026-09
Title 6 — PUBLIC WORKS›Chapter 5 — WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND TREATMENT
Yuba City Municipal Code Art. 9 Miscellaneous Provisions
Yuba City Municipal Code · 2026-10 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · Yuba City
Cite as: Yuba City Municipal Code Article 9 · Text as of 2026-10-04
Sec. 6-5.901. - Pretreatment program fees.¶
The City may adopt reasonable fees for reimbursement of costs of setting up and operating the City's pretreatment program. Fees may include;
(a) Fees for wastewater discharge permit applications, including the cost of processing such applications;
(b) Fees for monitoring, inspection, and surveillance procedures including the cost of collecting and analyzing a user's discharge, and reviewing monitoring reports submitted by users;
(c) Fees for reviewing and responding to accidental discharge procedures and construction;
(d) Fees for filing appeals; and
(e) Other fees as the City may deem necessary to carry out the requirements contained herein. These fees relate solely to the matters covered by this chapter and are separate from all other fees, fines, and penalties chargeable by the City.
(Ord. No. 007-16, § 2, 6-21-2016; Ord. No. 001-22, § 3, 1-18-2022)
Sec. 6-5.902. - Severability.¶
If any court of competent jurisdiction invalidates any provision of this chapter, the remaining provisions shall not be affected and shall continue in full force and effect.
(Ord. No. 007-16, § 2, 6-21-2016; Ord. No. 001-22, § 3, 1-18-2022)
Sec. 6-5.903. - Affirmative defenses to discharge violations.¶
Sec. 6-5.903.A. - Upset.¶
(a) For the purposes of this section, "upset" means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with categorical pretreatment standards because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the user. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventative maintenance, or careless or improper operation.
(b) An upset shall constitute an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with categorical pretreatment standards if the requirements of paragraph (c), below, are met.
(c) A user who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs and/or other relevant evidence that:
(1) An upset occurred and the user can identify the cause(s) of the upset;
(2) The facility was at the time being operated in a prudent and workman-like manner and in compliance with applicable operation and maintenance procedures; and
(3) The user submitted the following information to the Public Works Director within 24 hours of becoming aware of the upset (if this information is provided orally, a written submission must be provided within five days):
(i) A description of the indirect discharge and cause of noncompliance;
(ii) The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times or, if not corrected, the anticipated timeframe that the noncompliance is expected to continue; and
(iii) Steps being taken and/or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the noncompliance.
(d) In any enforcement proceeding, the user seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset shall have the burden of proof.
(e) Users shall have the opportunity for a judicial determination on any claim of upset only in an enforcement action brought for noncompliance with categorical pretreatment standards.
(f) Users shall control production of all discharges to the extent necessary to maintain compliance with categorical pretreatment standards upon reduction, loss, or failure of its treatment facility until the facility is restored or an alternative method of treatment is provided. This requirement applies in the situation where, among other things, the primary source of power of the treatment facility is reduced, lost, or fails.
(Ord. No. 007-16, § 2, 6-21-2016; Ord. No. 001-22, § 3, 1-18-2022)
Sec. 6-5.903.B. - Bypass.¶
(a) For the purpose of this section:
(1) "Bypass" means the intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a user's treatment facility.
(2) "Severe property damage" means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities which causes them to become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. "Severe property damage" does not mean economic loss caused by delays in production.
(b) A user may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause pretreatment standards or requirements to be violated, but only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. These bypasses are not subject to the provision of paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section.
(c) Bypass notifications.
(1) If a user knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice to the Public Works Director, at least ten days before the date of the bypass, if possible.
(2) A user shall submit oral notice to the Public Works Director of an unanticipated bypass that exceeds applicable pretreatment standards within 24 hours from the time it becomes aware of the bypass. A written submission shall also be provided within five days of the time the user becomes aware of the bypass. The written submission shall contain a description of the bypass and its cause; the duration of the bypass, including exact dates and times, and, if the bypass has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the bypass. The Public Works Director may waive the written report on a case-by-case basis if the oral report has been received within 24 hours.
(d) Bypass.
(1) Bypass is prohibited, and the Public Works Director may take an enforcement action against a user for a bypass, unless:
(i) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage;
(ii) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of unwanted wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate back-up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and
(iii) The user submitted notices as required under paragraph (c) of this section.
(2) The Public Works Director may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if the Public Works Director determines that it will meet the three conditions listed in paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(Ord. No. 007-16, § 2, 6-21-2016; Ord. No. 001-22, § 3, 1-18-2022)
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code