Earlier editions: 2026-07
Title LIP — Local Implementation Plan
Malibu Municipal Code § 13.3 Permit Required
Malibu Municipal Code · 2026-10 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · Malibu
Sections in this part
- § 13.4
- 13.6 APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND FEES
- 13.10 DETERMINING NOTICE AND HEARING PROCEDURES.
- 13.12 PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED
- 13.13 ADMINISTRATIVE PERMITS
- 13.14 EMERGENCY PERMITS.
- 13.18 FORMAT OF PERMITS
- 13.20 APPEALS.
- 13.24 REVOCATION.
- 13.26 VARIANCES.
- 13.27 SITE PLAN REVIEW AND MINOR MODIFICATIONS.
- 13.28 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS.
- 13.29 ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS
Cite as: Malibu Municipal Code § 13.3 · Text as of 2026-10-04
13.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT.¶
13.2 APPLICABILITY.¶
13.3 PERMIT REQUIRED¶
A. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, any person wishing to perform or undertake any development in the coastal zone, other than a facility subject to Public Resources Code Section 25500, shall obtain a coastal development permit in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. Development undertaken pursuant to a coastal development permit shall conform to the plans, specification, terms and conditions of the permit. The requirements for obtaining a coastal development permit shall be in addition to requirements to obtain any other permits or approvals required by other city ordinances or codes or from any state, regional or local agency. Subsequent to the certification of the LCP, the city shall immediately assume coastal development permitting authority and no application for a coastal development permit shall be deemed approved if the city fails to take timely action to approve or deny the application for a coastal development permit.
B. A person undertaking development included in a public works plan or long range development plan approved by the Coastal Commission is not required to obtain a coastal development permit from the city. Other city permits may be required.
C. The review of a coastal development permit application may be combined with and/or processed concurrently with the review of any other discretionary permit application required by other city ordinances. When an application for a planned development is proposed, the city shall not grant any discretionary approval of a planned development that conflicts with any policy or standard of the LCP, including the land use designations. The city may request certification of an LCP amendment to accommodate a proposed planned development in accordance with the procedures in Chapter 19 of the Malibu LIP (LCP amendment procedures). Neither the preliminary development plan nor the final development plan shall be effective until or unless a coastal development permit is approved that authorizes the development included in the plan.
D. All development proposed or undertaken on tidelands, submerged lands or on public trust lands, whether filled or unfilled, or within any state university or college within the coastal zone shall require a permit issued by the California Coastal Commission in accordance with procedures specified by the Coastal Commission, in addition to other permits or approvals required by the city.
E. Where a proposed project straddles the boundaries of the city of Malibu and another local jurisdiction or where a proposed project straddles the boundaries of the city's Coastal Development Permit jurisdiction area and the Coastal Commission's retained jurisdiction area, the applicant shall obtain separate Coastal Development Permits from each jurisdiction.
F. Development that occurred after the effective date of the Coastal Act or its predecessor, the Coastal Zone Conservation Act, if applicable, that was not authorized in a coastal development permit or otherwise authorized under the Coastal Act, is not lawfully established or lawfully authorized development. No improvements, repair, modification or additions to such existing development may be approved, unless the city also approves a coastal development permit that authorizes the existing development. The coastal development permit shall only be approved if the existing and proposed development, with any applicable conditions of approval, is consistent with the policies and standards of the LCP.
13.4 EXEMPTIONS FROM AND DE MINIMIS WAIVERS OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT. The projects described in Sections 13.4.1 through 13.4.9 are exempt from the requirement to obtain a Coastal Development Permit and subject to the requirements of Section 13.4.10. Section 13.4.11 describes general requirements for de minimis waivers and projects eligible for de minimis waivers.
13.5 NONCONFORMING USE OR STRUCTURES¶
A. This section (13.5) shall apply to the following: (1) any existing and lawfully established or lawfully authorized use of land or to any existing and lawfully established or lawfully authorized buildings and other structures that do not conform to the policies and development standards of the certified LCP, or any subsequent amendments thereto; and (2) development that is not exempt from the coastal development permit requirements pursuant to Section 13.4 of the Malibu LIP (Exemptions). Development that occurred after the effective date of the Coastal Act or its predecessor, the Coastal Zone Conservation Act, if applicable, that was not authorized in a coastal development permit or otherwise authorized under the Coastal Act, is not lawfully established or lawfully authorized development, is not subject to the provisions of Section 13.5, but is subject to the provisions of Section 13.3 (F) of the Malibu LIP.
B. Nonconforming uses as defined by 13.5(A) of the Malibu LIP shall not be intensified, or expanded into additional locations or structures.
C. Nonconforming structures as defined by 13.5(A) of the Malibu LIP may be repaired and maintained if it does not result in enlargement or expansion of the structure. However, demolition and/or reconstruction that results in replacement of more than fifty (50) percent of non-conforming structures, including all demolition and/or reconstruction that was undertaken after certification of the LCP, is not permitted unless such structures are brought into conformance with the policies and standards of the LCP.
D. Additions and/or improvements to nonconforming structures may be authorized, provided that the additions and/or improvements themselves comply with the current policies and standards of the LCP, except as provided in Section 13.5 (F) of the Malibu LIP.
E. For nonconforming structures located on a blufftop or on the beach that do not comply with the setbacks required for new development on a blufftop or beach, additions that increase the size of the structure by fifty (50) percent or more, including all additions that were undertaken after certification of the LCP, shall not be authorized unless such structures are brought into conformance with the policies and standards of the LCP.
F. If a nonconforming use or structure as defined by 13.5(A) of the Malibu LIP is damaged or destroyed by natural disaster, replacement shall be subject to provisions of 13.4.6 of the Malibu LIP (Structures Destroyed by Natural Disaster).
G. If any nonconforming use as defined by 13.5 (A) of the Malibu LIP is abandoned for a continuous period of not less than 6 months, any subsequent use of such land or the structure in which the use was located shall be in conformity with the regulations specified by the LCP for the district in which such land is located.
13.7 ACTION ON COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT¶
A. Permits issued under Section 13.13 of the Malibu LIP (Administrative Permits), and any subsequent changes to the administrative permit that are consistent with Section 13.3 of the Malibu LIP, and permits issued under Section 13.14 of the Malibu LIP (Emergency Permits) may be decided upon by the Planning Manager.
B. All other coastal development permits shall be decided upon by the Planning Commission subject to appeal provisions in Section 13.20 of the Malibu LIP (Appeals). Minor changes to the permit may be subsequently decided upon by the Manager consistent with Administrative Permit procedures; significant changes from the original approval of the permit must be approved through a permit amendment approved by the Planning Commission.
C. Except as provided in Section 13.4 of the Malibu LIP (Emergency Permits), the Environmental Review Board (ERB) shall serve as advisors to the Planning Manager, Planning Commission and City Council for coastal development permits within or adjacent to ESHA as provided in the ESHA Overlay zone or identified as being ESHA pursuant to provisions of the ESHA Overlay Chapter (Ch. 4) of the Malibu LIP. The ERB shall provide recommendations on the conformance or lack of conformance of the proposed project with the policies of the certified Malibu LUP and may suggest mitigation measures designed to avoid or minimize impacts on environmentally sensitive habitat area resources.
13.8 CONDITIONS.¶
13.9 FINDINGS.¶
All decisions on coastal development permits shall be accompanied by written findings:
A. That the project as described in the application and accompanying materials, as modified by any conditions of approval, conforms with certified City of Malibu Local Coastal Program; and
B. If the project is located between the first public road and the sea, that the project is in conformity with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act of 1976 (commencing with Sections 30200 of the Public Resources Code).
C. The project is the least environmentally damaging alternative.
D. If the project is located in or adjacent to an environmentally sensitive habitat area pursuant to Chapter 4 of the Malibu LIP (ESHA Overlay), that the project conforms with the recommendations of the Environmental Review Board, or if it does not conform with the recommendations, findings explaining why it is not feasible to take the recommended action.
13.11 PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED AND PUBLIC COMMENT¶
A. At least one public hearing shall be required on all appealable development as defined in Chapter 2 of the Malibu LIP (Definitions).
Such hearing shall occur no earlier than seven (7) calendar days following the mailing of the notice required in Section 13.12 of the Malibu LIP. The public hearing may be conducted in accordance with existing City procedures or in any other manner reasonably calculated to give interested persons an opportunity to appear and present their viewpoints, either orally or in writing.
If a decision on a development permit is continued by the City to a time which is neither (a) previously stated in the notice provided pursuant to Section 13.12 of the Malibu LIP, nor (b) announced at the hearing as being continued to a time certain, the local government shall provide notice of the further hearings (or action on the proposed development) in the same manner, and within the same time limits as established in Section 13565 of the California Code of Regulations.
B. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Manager on an application for a Coastal Development Permit, or on an appeal of a Coastal Development Permit, at any time prior to the close of the public hearing. If no public hearing is required, written comments may be submitted prior to the decision date specified in the public notice. Written comments shall be submitted to the Planning Manager who shall forward them to the appropriate person, commission, board or the Council and to the applicant.
13.15 FINALITY OF CITY ACTION.¶
13.16 NOTICE OF FINAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACTION¶
A. Notice after Final City Action. Within seven calendar days of a local government completing its review and meeting the requirements of Section 13.15 of the Malibu LIP, the city shall notify by first class mail the South Central Coast District Office of the Coastal Commission and any persons who specifically requested notice of such action by submitting a self-addressed, stamped envelope to the local government (or, where required, who paid a reasonable fee to receive such notice) of its action. Such notice shall include conditions of approval and written findings and the procedures for appeal of the local decision to the Coastal Commission.
B. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 30166.5, notwithstanding the requirements of Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 65920) of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, once the city assumes coastal development permitting authority pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 30166.5, no application for a coastal development permit shall be deemed approved if the city fails to take timely action to approve or deny the application.
13.17 EFFECTIVE DATE OF CITY ACTION.¶
The city's final decision on an application for a coastal development permit that is appealable to the Coastal Commission shall become effective after the ten (10) working day appeal period to the Coastal Commission has expired unless either of the following occur:
A. An appeal is filed in accordance with Section 13.20 of the Malibu LIP (Appeals);
B. The notice of final local government action does not meet the requirements of Section 13.16 of the Malibu LIP.
When either of the circumstances in A or B occur, the Coastal Commission shall, within five calendar days of receiving notice of that circumstance, notify the city and the applicant that the effective date of the city action has been suspended.
13.19 PROCEDURES FOR RECORDATION OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS.¶
All coastal development permits subject to conditions of approval pertaining to public access and open space or conservation easements shall be subject to either of the following procedures:
A. The executive director of the Coastal Commission shall review and approve all legal documents specified in the conditions of approval of a coastal development permit for public access and conservation/open space easements.
Upon completion of permit review by the city and prior to the issuance of the permit, the city shall forward a copy of the permit conditions and findings of approval and copies of the legal documents to the executive director of the Commission for review and approval of the legal adequacy and consistency with the requirements of potential accepting agencies;
The executive director of the Commission shall have fifteen (15) working days from receipt of the documents in which to complete the review and notify the applicant of recommended revisions if any;
The city may issue the permit upon expiration of the fifteen (15) working day period if notification of inadequacy has not been received by the city within that time period;
If the executive director has recommended revisions to the applicant, the permit shall not be issued until the deficiencies have been resolved to the satisfaction of the executive director; or
B. If the city requests, the Commission shall delegate the authority to process the recordation of the necessary legal documents to the city if the requirements of 14 Cal. Code of Regulations, section 13574(b) are met. If this authority is delegated, upon completion of the recordation of the documents, the city shall forward a copy of the permit conditions and findings of approval and copies of the legal documents pertaining to the public access and open space conditions to the executive director of the commission.
13.21 EXPIRATION OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT.¶
13.22 PERMIT AMENDMENTS.¶
13.23 REAPPLICATION.¶
13.25 ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES¶
A. In addition to all other available remedies, the City may seek to enforce the provisions of the LCP and the Coastal Act pursuant to the provisions of Public Resources Code section 30800—30822.
B. Any person who performs or undertakes development in violation of the LCP or inconsistent with any coastal development permit previously issued may, in addition to any other penalties, be civilly liable in accordance with the provisions of Public Resources Code Division 20 Section 30820.
C. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 30811, the planning manager may, after a public hearing, order restoration of a site if it finds that the development has occurred without a coastal development permit from the appropriate authority, the development is inconsistent with the provisions of the Coastal Act, and the development is causing continuing resource damage. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 30821.6, any person who intentionally or negligently violates a restoration order may be civilly liable for a penalty for each day in which the violation persists.
13.30 HOUSING ACCESSIBILITY—REQUEST FOR REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION¶
A. Purpose and Intent. This section sets forth the procedures to request reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities seeking equal access to housing under the Federal Housing Act and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (the Acts) in the application of zoning laws and other land use regulations, policies and procedures.
It is the intent of this section that, notwithstanding time limits provided to perform specific functions, application review, decision making, and appeals proceed expeditiously, especially where the request is time sensitive, and so as to reduce impediments to equal access to housing.
B. Applicability.
A request for reasonable accommodation may be made by any person with a disability, his/her representative or any property owner, when the application of a zoning law or other land use regulation, policy or practice acts as a barrier to fair housing opportunities.
A request for reasonable accommodation may include a modification or exception to the rules, standards, practices and procedures regulating the siting, development or use of housing or housing-related facilities that would eliminate regulatory barriers and provide a person with a disability equal opportunity to housing of their choice.
A person with a disability is a person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits or substantially limits one or more major life activities; anyone who is regarded as having such impairment; or anyone who has a record of such impairment. This section shall only apply to those persons who are defined as disabled under the Acts.
C. Application Submittal.
- Any person with a disability may file an application for a request for reasonable accommodation with the Planning Department, on a form approved by the Planning Director and shall contain the following information, accompanied by a fee established by resolution of the City Council:
a. Applicant's and/or property owner's name, mailing address, daytime phone number and email address;
b. The address of the property for which the request is being made;
c. Current actual use of the property;
d. The basis for the claim that the individual is considered disabled under the Acts;
e. The specific code provision, regulation, procedure or policy of the LCP from which reasonable accommodation is being requested including an explanation of how application of the existing code provision, regulation, procedure or policy precludes reasonable accommodation;
f. The length of time the reasonable accommodation is necessary;
g. An explanation of why the reasonable accommodation is necessary to make the specific property accessible to the individual;
h. A determination of whether or not the request would result in adverse impacts to wetlands, environmentally sensitive habitat area, public access, public views and/or other coastal resources;
i. A site plan or illustrative drawing showing the proposed accommodation; and
j. Any other information required to make the findings required by subsection (F)(5) of this section consistent with the Acts.
A request for reasonable accommodation may be filed at any time that the accommodation may be necessary to ensure equal access to housing. If the project for which the request for reasonable accommodation is being made also requires a CDP, then the applicant shall file the application submittal information together with the application for the CDP for concurrent review.
A reasonable accommodation does not affect or negate an individual's obligations to comply with other applicable regulations not at issue with the requested accommodation.
If an individual needs assistance in making the request for reasonable accommodation, the City shall provide assistance to ensure that the process is accessible.
D. Reviewing Authority.
Applications for reasonable accommodation shall be reviewed by the Director or his/her designee, if no approval is sought other than the request for reasonable accommodation. The Director may, in his/her discretion, refer applications that may have had a material effect on surrounding properties (e.g., location of improvements in the front yard, would violate a specific condition of approval, improvements are permanent) directly to the Planning Commission for a decision.
Applications for reasonable accommodation submitted for concurrent review with a CDP application shall be reviewed by the authority reviewing the CDP application.
E. Findings. A written decision to grant, grant with conditions, or deny a request for reasonable accommodation shall make all of the following findings:
The housing, which is the subject of the request, will be occupied by a person with a disability as defined in subsection (B)(3) above.
The approved reasonable accommodation is necessary to make housing available to a person with a disability as defined in subsection (B)(3) above.
The approved reasonable accommodation would not impose an undue financial or administrative burden on the City.
The approved reasonable accommodation would not require a fundamental alteration in the nature of the LCP.
The approved reasonable accommodation would not adversely impact coastal resources.
The project that is the subject of the approved reasonable accommodation conforms to the applicable provisions of the LCP and the applicable provisions of this section, with the exception of the provision(s) for which the reasonable accommodation is granted.
F. Decision.
The Director shall consider an application, and issue a written determination within forty-five (45) calendar days of the date of receipt of a completed application. If necessary, to reach a determination on any request for reasonable accommodation, the review authority may request further information from the applicant consistent with this section, specifying in detail what information is required. In the event a request for further information is made, the applicable time period to issue a written determination shall be stayed until the applicant responds to the request.
At least ten (10) calendar days before issuing a written determination on the application, the Director shall mail notice to the applicant and all abutting property owners and occupants and those immediately across the street that the City will be considering the application and inviting written comments on the requested accommodation.
Upon referral from the Director, the Planning Commission shall consider an application at the next reasonably available public meeting after submission of an application for reasonable accommodation. The Commission shall issue a written determination within forty-five (45) calendar days after such public meeting.
Notice of Planning Commission meeting to review and act on the application shall be made in writing, ten (10) calendar days prior to the meeting and mailed to the applicant and all abutting property owners and occupants as well as those immediately across the street.
The review authority's written decision shall set forth the findings, any conditions or approval, notice of the right to appeal and the right to request reasonable accommodation on the appeals process, if necessary. The decision shall be mailed to the applicant, and when the approving authority is the Director, to any person having provided written or verbal comment on the application.
The written decision of the reviewing authority shall be final unless appealed in the manner set forth in subsection (F)(8) below.
While a request for reasonable accommodation is pending, all laws and regulations otherwise applicable to the property that is the subject of the request shall remain in full force and effect.
Where the improvements or modification approved through reasonable accommodation would generally require a variance, a variance shall not be required.
G. Conditions of Approval. In granting a request for reasonable accommodation, the reviewing authority may impose any conditions of approval deemed reasonable and necessary to ensure that the reasonable accommodation would comply with the findings required by subsection E of this section.
H. Appeals. The process set forth in Section 13.20 shall apply, as supplemented by the following:
The Planning Commission or the City Council, as applicable, shall hear the matter and render a determination as soon as reasonably practicable, but in no event later than ninety (90) calendar days after an appeal has been filed. All determinations shall address and be based upon the same findings required to be made in the original determination from which the appeal is taken.
The City shall provide notice of an appeal hearing to the applicant, adjacent property owners and any other person requesting notification at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the hearing. The appeal authority shall announce its findings within thirty (30) calendar days of the hearing, unless good cause is found for an extension, and the decision shall be mailed to the applicant. The Council's action shall be final.
If an individual needs assistance in filing an appeal on an adverse decision, the City shall provide assistance to ensure that the appeals process is accessible.
Nothing in this procedure shall preclude an aggrieved individual from seeking other state or federal remedy available.
I. Waiver of Time Periods. Notwithstanding any provisions in this section regarding the occurrence of any action within a specified period of time, the applicant may request additional time beyond that provided for in this section or may request a continuance regarding any decision or consideration by the City of a pending appeal. Extensions of time sought by applicants shall not be considered delay on the part of the City, shall not constitute failure by the City to provide for prompt decisions on applications and shall not be a violation of any required time period set forth in this section.
J. Discontinuance. Unless the review authority determines a reasonable accommodation runs with the land, a reasonable accommodation shall lapse if the rights granted by it are discontinued for one hundred eighty (180) consecutive days. If the person initially occupying a residence or business vacate, the reasonable accommodation shall remain in effect only if the Director determines that:
The modification is physically integrated into a structure and cannot easily be removed or altered to comply with Chapter 3 of the Local Implementation Plan;
Its removal would constitute an unreasonable financial burden; and
The accommodation is necessary to give another disabled individual an equal opportunity to enjoy the dwelling or business.
a. The Director may request the applicant or his or her successor-in-interest to the property to provide documentation that subsequent occupants are persons with disabilities. Failure to provide such documentation within ten (10) days of the date of a request by the Director shall constitute grounds for discontinuance by the City of a previously approved reasonable accommodation.
(Ord. 303 § 3, 2007; Ord. 335 § 3, 2009; Ord. 373 § 3, 2013; Ord. 393 § 4, 2015; Ord. 445 § 4, 2019; Ord. 449 § 4, 2019; Ord. 524, 3/12/2025)
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code