Skip to content

State statute

San Mateo — 06-81

California foreclosure, tax-defaulted, court-ordered and probate-sale law and official procedures — verbatim and citable.

Edition
2026-09-26
Last updated
2026-09-27
Jurisdiction
San Mateo County

San Mateo — 06-81

Source: https://sanmateo.courts.ca.gov/system/files/06-81.pdf

Sparse pages use OCR; original PDF remains authoritative.

Exceptions & meaning →

Page 1

Ne 16 17 18 19 FILED SAN MATEO COUNTY JAN 25 2006 STANDING ORDER 06-81 Lourt IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ORDER OF FINDING OF GOOD CAUSE REGARDING APPOINTMENT OF STEPHANIE GARRATT AS A SUPERIOR COURT COMMISSIONER NUNC PRO TUNC [California Rules of Court, Rule 6.660] SaaS SS SES WHEREAS, the California Rules of Court, Rule 6.660(b)(1) specifies that in order to be eligible for appointment as a subordinate judicial officer the candidate must be “admitted to practice law in California for at least ten years or, upon a finding of good cause by the presiding judge, for at least five years; and WHEREAS, the court did make a finding of good cause that Stephanie Garratt was qualified to serve as a Commissioner for this Court, pursuant to Rule 6.660(b)(1), when she was selected by the Court and appointed as a Court Commissioner. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 6.660 (b)(1), the Court finds that there is good cause to appoint Stephanie Garratt Commissioner of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo effective September 15, 2004, Nunc Pro Tunc. Dated: JAN 25 2006 George A. Miram, Presiding Judge NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER FOR FINDING OF GOOD CAUSE FOR APPOINTMENT OR STEFPHANTREF GARRATT AS COTIRT COMMISSIONER

Exceptions & meaning →

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.