State statute
Contra Costa — Local Rules Effective July 1, 2025
California foreclosure, tax-defaulted, court-ordered and probate-sale law and official procedures — verbatim and citable.
- Edition
- 2026-09-26
- Last updated
- 2026-09-28
- Jurisdiction
- Contra Costa County
Contra Costa — Local Rules Effective July 1, 2025¶
Source: https://contracosta.courts.ca.gov/system/files/general/july2025localrules-final_0.pdf
Sparse pages use OCR; original PDF remains authoritative.
Page 1¶
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
LOCAL RULES OF COURT
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2025
Page 2¶
Contra Costa Superior Court July 1, 2025 Local Rules Rule Effective Dates
Rule Number New/Revised/Effective Date Rule Number New/Revised/Effective Date 1.1 1/1/24 2.70 1/1/15 1.2 1/1/24 2.71 1/1/16 1.3 1/1/15 2.72 7/1/18 1.4 1/1/24 2.73 1/1/19 1.5 1/1/15 2.90 1/1/15 1.6 7/1/20 2.91 1/1/15 1.20 1/1/15 2.120 1/1/16 1.21 1/1/15 2.121 1/1/15 1.22 1/1/15 2.122 1/1/15 1.23 1/1/15 2.123 1/1/16 1.24 1/1/16 2.124 1/1/16 1.25 1/1/16 2.150 7/1/21 1.26 1/1/15 2.160 7/1/23 1.27 1/1/18 2.170 1/1/22 2.180 1/1/25 2.1 1/1/24 2.2 1/1/24 3.1 1/1/15 2.3 1/1/16 3.2 1/1/15 2.4 1/1/16 3.3 1/1/15 2.5 1/1/24 3.4 1/1/16 2.6 1/1/24 3.5 1/1/16 2.7 1/1/24 3.6 1/1/15 2.8 1/1/24 3.7 1/1/19 2.9 1/1/24 3.8 1/1/17 2.30 1/1/24 3.9 1/1/16 2.31 1/1/24 3.10 1/1/15 2.32 1/1/24 3.11 1/1/17 2.33 1/1/24 3.12 1/1/18 2.34 1/1/24 3.13 1/1/19 2.35 1/1/15 3.14 1/1/20 2.40 1/1/15 3.15 1/1/18 2.41 1/1/16 3.16 1/1/25 2.42 1/1/15 3.17 1/1/18 2.43 1/1/15 3.18 1/1/18 2.44 1/1/16 3.19 1/1/24 2.50 1/1/19 3.40 1/1/24 2.51 1/1/19 3.41 1/1/24 2.52 1/1/20 3.42 1/1/24 2.53 1/1/20 3.43 1/1/22 2.54 1/1/19 3.44 1/1/16 2.60 1/1/16 3.45 1/1/19
Page 3¶
Rule Number New/Revised/Effective Date Rule Number New/Revised/Effective Date 4.46 1/1/24 3.46 7/1/25 4.60 1/1/24 3.47 7/1/25 4.61 1/1/24 3.48 7/1/25 4.62 1/1/24 3.49 7/1/25 4.63 1/1/24 3.50 7/1/25 4.64 1/1/24 3.51 7/1/25 4.80 1/1/24 3.52 7/1/25 4.81 1/1/15 3.53 7/1/25 3.54 7/1/25 5.0 1/1/23 3.80 1/1/16 5.1 7/1/25 3.90 1/1/18 5.2 7/1/25 3.100 7/1/23 5.3 1/1/23 3.101 1/1/16 5.4 7/1/23 3.102 1/1/15 5.5 1/1/23 3.103 1/1/15 5.6 1/1/23 3.200 1/1/25 5.7 1/1/23 3.201 1/1/25 5.8 1/1/23 3.202 1/1/25 5.9 1/1/23 3.203 1/1/17 5.10 1/1/23 3.204 1/1/25 5.11 1/1/18 3.205 1/1/19 5.12 1/1/23 3.206 1/1/16 5.13 1/1/23 3.300 1/1/24 5.14 1/1/18 3.301 1/1/24 5.15 1/1/18 5.16 1/1/19 4.01 1/1/24 5.17 1/1/23 4.1 1/1/24 5.18 7/1/25 4.2 1/1/24 5.19 1/1/23 4.3 1/1/24 5.20 1/1/22 4.4 1/1/24 5.21 1/1/23 4.5 REPEALED 5.50 1/1/21 4.6 1/1/18 5.51 1/1/21 4.7 1/1/15 5.52 1/1/21 4.8 1/1/20 5.53 1/1/18 4.10 1/1/21 5.54 1/1/21 4.11 1/1/24 5.55 1/1/21 4.12 1/1/24 5.56 REPEALED 4.40 1/1/15 5.57 1/1/15 4.41 1/1/15 5.58 1/1/21 4.42 1/1/24 5.59 7/1/21 4.43 1/1/24 5.60 REPEALED 4.44 1/1/24 5.61 1/1/21 4.45 1/1/24 5.62 REPEALED
Page 4¶
Rule Number New/Revised/Effective Date Rule Number New/Revised/Effective Date 5.63 1/1/21 7.109 1/1/15 5.64 1/1/21 7.110 1/1/15 5.65 1/1/21 7.111 1/1/16 5.66 1/1/21 7.112 1/1/15 5.67 REPEALED 7.113 REPEALED 5.68 1/1/21 7.114 REPEALED 5.69 1/1/21 7.150 1/1/15 5.70 1/1/21 7.151 1/1/15 5.71 1/1/19 7.152 1/1/16 5.72 1/1/19 7.153 1/1/16 5/73 7/1/20 7.154 1/1/15 5.74 7/1/20 7.155 1/1/15 5.75 7/1/20 7.156 1/1/15 7.200 1/1/15 7.1 1/1/25 7.201 REPEALED 7.2 1/1/15 7.202 1/1/15 7.3 1/1/15 7.203 1/1/15 7.4 1/1/23 7.250 1/1/15 7.5 1/1/19 7.251 1/1/15 7.50 1/1/16 7.252 1/1/15 7.51 1/1/17 7.253 1/1/16 7.52 1/1/16 7.254 REPEALED 7.53 1/1/15 7.255 1/1/15 7.54 1/1/15 7.256 1/1/15 7.55 1/1/16 7.257 1/1/15 7.56 1/1/15 7.300 1/1/16 7.57 REPEALED 7.301 1/1/15 7.58 1/1/15 7.302 1/1/15 7.59 1/1/23 7.303 1/1/15 7.60 1/1/15 7.304 REPEALED 7.61 1/1/16 7.305 1/1/15 7.62 1/1/16 7.306 1/1/16 7.63 1/1/15 7.307 1/1/15 7.64 1/1/15 7.308 1/1/15 7.65 1/1/16 7.309 1/1/16 7.100 REPEALED 7.310 1/1/15 7.101 1/1/15 7.311 1/1/15 7.102 1/1/15 7.312 1/1/15 7.103 REPEALED 7.313 1/1/15 7.104 1/1/23 7.314 1/1/15 7.105 1/1/15 7.315 1/1/15 7.106 1/1/15 7.316 1/1/18 7.107 1/1/16 7.317 1/1/15 7.108 1/1/15 7.350 1/1/23
Page 5¶
Rule Number New/Revised/Effective Date Rule Number New/Revised/Effective Date 7.351 1/1/15 8.1 7/1/21 7.400 1/1/15 7.401 1/1/15 Guideline Attachment 1 7/1/06 7.402 1/1/15 Guideline Attachment 2 1/1/23 7.403 1/1/15 Guideline Attachment 3 1/1/16 7.404 1/1/15 Guideline Attachment 4 1/1/18 7.405 1/1/16 7.406 1/1/17 Forms List 7/1/25 7.411 1/1/17 7.412 1/1/23 7.413 1/1/16 7.414 1/1/15 7.415 1/1/15 7.416 1/1/23 7.417 1/1/21 7.419 REPEALED 7.420 1/1/15 7.421 REPEALED 7.422 1/1/15 7.423 1/1/15 7.424 1/1/15 7.425 1/1/15 7.426 7/1/21 7.427 1/1/15 7.428 1/1/15 7.429 1/1/15 7.450 1/1/16 7.451 1/1/16 7.452 1/1/23 7.501 1/1/15 7.502 REPEALED 7.520 1/1/18
Page 6¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title One. General Governance of Judicial and Non-Judicial Court Operations ................16 Chapter 1. Administrative Rules ...........................................................................................16
Rule 1.1 — Adoption and Amendment of Rules…¶
Rule 1.1. Adoption and Amendment of Rules ................................................................................ 16
Rule 1.2 — Department Designations…¶
Rule 1.2. Department Designations ................................................................................................ 16
Rule 1.3 — Presiding Judge…¶
Rule 1.3. Presiding Judge ............................................................................................................... 16
Rule 1.4 — Executive Committee…¶
Rule 1.4. Executive Committee ...................................................................................................... 16
Rule 1.5 — Definition of Vacation for Judge…¶
Rule 1.5. Definition of Vacation for Judge ...................................................................................... 17
Rule 1.6 — Activities Prohibited on Courthouse Grounds…¶
Rule 1.6. Activities Prohibited on Courthouse Grounds .................................................................. 17 Chapter 2. Media Coverage ...................................................................................................17
Rule 1.20 — Media Coverage…¶
Rule 1.20. Media Coverage ............................................................................................................ 17
Rule 1.21 — Requests for Coverage…¶
Rule 1.21. Requests for Coverage ................................................................................................. 18
Rule 1.22 — Limitation on Coverage…¶
Rule 1.22. Limitation on Coverage ................................................................................................. 18
Rule 1.23 — Prohibited…¶
Rule 1.23. Prohibited Coverage...................................................................................................... 18
Rule 1.24 — Parking Limitations for Media Vehicles…¶
Rule 1.24. Parking Limitations for Media Vehicles ......................................................................... 19
Rule 1.25 — Areas in Court Facilities Where Media Activities are Authorized…¶
Rule 1.25. Areas in Court Facilities Where Media Activities are Authorized ................................. 19
Rule 1.26 — Video Recording and Still Photography…¶
Rule 1.26. Video Recording and Still Photography ........................................................................ 20
Rule 1.27 — Body Worn Cameras…¶
Rule 1.27. Body Worn Cameras ..................................................................................................... 20 Title Two. General and Administrative Rules .......................................................................21 Chapter 1. Jurors ...................................................................................................................21
Rule 2.1 — Selection of Prospective Jurors…¶
Rule 2.1. Selection of Prospective Jurors ....................................................................................... 21
Rule 2.2 — Juror Source…¶
Rule 2.2. Juror Source Lists............................................................................................................ 21
Rule 2.3 — Determining Juror Qualifications, Excluding Prospective Jurors…¶
Rule 2.3. Determining Juror Qualifications, Excluding Prospective Jurors .................................... 21
Rule 2.4 — Statutory Excusals of Jurors…¶
Rule 2.4. Statutory Excusals of Jurors ........................................................................................... 21
Rule 2.5 — Temporary Deferment of Service…¶
Rule 2.5. Temporary Deferment of Service .................................................................................... 22
Rule 2.6 — Employment While Serving as Juror…¶
Rule 2.6. Employment While Serving as Juror ............................................................................... 22
Rule 2.7 — Period of Juror Service…¶
Rule 2.7. Period of Juror Service .................................................................................................... 22
Rule 2.8 — Juror Telephone Standby…¶
Rule 2.8. Juror Telephone Standby ................................................................................................ 22
Rule 2.9 — Jury Assembly Room…¶
Rule 2.9. Jury Assembly Room ...................................................................................................... 22 Chapter 2. Grand Jury ...........................................................................................................23
Rule 2.30 — Grand Jury…¶
Rule 2.30. Grand Jury Impanelment............................................................................................... 23
Rule 2.31 — Solicitation for Grand Jury Applications…¶
Rule 2.31. Solicitation for Grand Jury Applications ........................................................................ 23
Rule 2.32 — Grand Jury Qualifications…¶
Rule 2.32. Grand Jury Qualifications .............................................................................................. 23
Rule 2.33 — Grand Jury Selection Committee…¶
Rule 2.33. Grand Jury Selection Committee .................................................................................. 23
Rule 2.34 — Additional Grand Jury…¶
Rule 2.34. Additional Grand Jury .................................................................................................... 24
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 5 of 200
Page 7¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 2.35 — Sealing of Grand Jury Transcript…¶
Rule 2.35. Sealing of Grand Jury Transcript .................................................................................. 24 Chapter 3. Attorney’s Fees and Appointment of Counsel ...................................................24
Rule 2.40 — Attorney's Fee Schedule…¶
Rule 2.40. Attorney's Fee Schedule ............................................................................................... 24 FEE SCHEDULE ......................................................................................................................24
Rule 2.41 — Schedule for Use Entering Default Judgment…¶
Rule 2.41. Schedule for Use Entering Default Judgment .............................................................. 25
Rule 2.42 — Setting Attorney Fees in Contested…¶
Rule 2.42. Setting Attorney Fees in Contested Case..................................................................... 25
Rule 2.43 — Attorney Fees in Foreclosure Cases…¶
Rule 2.43. Attorney Fees in Foreclosure Cases ............................................................................ 25
Rule 2.44 — Itemization of Extraordinary Services…¶
Rule 2.44. Itemization of Extraordinary Services ........................................................................... 25 Chapter 4. Court Reporting Services ....................................................................................25
Rule 2.50 — Electronic Recording…¶
Rule 2.50. Electronic Recording ..................................................................................................... 26
Rule 2.51 — Notice of Availability of Court Reporting Services…¶
Rule 2.51. Notice of Availability of Court Reporting Services ......................................................... 26
Rule 2.52 — Unavailability of Court-Provided Court Reporters and Procurement of Outside…¶
Rule 2.52. Unavailability of Court-Provided Court Reporters and Procurement of Outside Private Reporters .................................................................................................................................... 26
Rule 2.53 — Court-Provided Court Reporters in Cases Involving Fee Waiver Litigants…¶
Rule 2.53. Court-Provided Court Reporters in Cases Involving Fee Waiver Litigants ................... 27
Rule 2.54 — Transcripts and Electronic Recording…¶
Rule 2.54. Transcripts and Electronic Recording ............................................................................ 28 Chapter 5. Sanctions .............................................................................................................29
Rule 2.60 — Sanctions…¶
Rule 2.60. Sanctions ....................................................................................................................... 29 Chapter 6. Information and Forms ........................................................................................29
Rule 2.70 — Form of Documents Filed with the Court…¶
Rule 2.70. Form of Documents Filed with the Court ...................................................................... 29
Rule 2.71 — Identifying Information on Filed Documents…¶
Rule 2.71. Identifying Information on Filed Documents ................................................................. 29
Rule 2.72 — Retention of Completed Copy Requests…¶
Rule 2.72. Retention of Completed Copy Requests ...................................................................... 29
Rule 2.73 — Access/View a Court File…¶
Rule 2.73. Access/View a Court File .............................................................................................. 30 Chapter 7. Mandatory Electronic Filing and Service ............................................................30 Rule 2.87. Adoption of Mandatory Electronic Filing and Service; Exceptions. ............................... 30 Chapter 8. Standards of Professional Courtesy ..................................................................31
Rule 2.90 — Consideration of History of Breaches in Professional Courtesy…¶
Rule 2.90. Consideration of History of Breaches in Professional Courtesy ................................... 32
Rule 2.91 — Standards of Professional Courtesy…¶
Rule 2.91. Standards of Professional Courtesy ............................................................................. 32
Rule 2.120 — Scheduling…¶
Rule 2.120. Scheduling ................................................................................................................... 33
Rule 2.121 — Discovery…¶
Rule 2.121. Discovery ..................................................................................................................... 34
Rule 2.122 — Conduct Towards Other Attorneys, the Court and Participants…¶
Rule 2.122. Conduct Towards Other Attorneys, the Court and Participants ................................. 35
Rule 2.123 — Candor to the Court and Opposing Counsel…¶
Rule 2.123. Candor to the Court and Opposing Counsel .............................................................. 36
Rule 2.124 — Efficient Administration…¶
Rule 2.124. Efficient Administration ................................................................................................ 37
Rule 2.150 — Committee on Bias…¶
Rule 2.150. Committee on Bias ...................................................................................................... 38 Chapter 9. Setting of Local Court Fees .................................................................................40
Rule 2.160 — Authorized Local Fees…¶
Rule 2.160. Authorized Local Fees ................................................................................................ 40 Chapter 10. Communication of Concerns ............................................................................41
Rule 2.170 — Concerns…¶
Rule 2.170. Concerns ..................................................................................................................... 41
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 6 of 200
Page 8¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Chapter 11. Remote Appearances ........................................................................................41
Rule 2.180 — Remote Appearances…¶
Rule 2.180. Remote Appearances .................................................................................................. 41 Title Three. Civil Rules ............................................................................................................44 Chapter 1. Administration of Civil Litigation ........................................................................44
Rule 3.1 — Applicability…¶
Rule 3.1. Applicability ...................................................................................................................... 44
Rule 3.2 — Definitions as Used in Title Three…¶
Rule 3.2. Definitions as Used in Title Three ................................................................................... 44
Rule 3.3 — Transferred Cases…¶
Rule 3.3. Transferred Cases ........................................................................................................... 44
Rule 3.4 — Policy…¶
Rule 3.4. Policy ............................................................................................................................... 44
Rule 3.5 — Venue, Filing and Form of Papers…¶
Rule 3.5. Venue, Filing and Form of Papers .................................................................................. 46
Rule 3.6 — Challenge to Assigned Judge…¶
Rule 3.6. Challenge to Assigned Judge ......................................................................................... 48
Rule 3.7 — Service of Summons, Complaint, Cross-Complaint, Responsive Pleadings and…¶
Rule 3.7. Service of Summons, Complaint, Cross-Complaint, Responsive Pleadings and Default Judgments .................................................................................................................................. 48
Rule 3.8 — Case Management Conference Procedure (Formerly Referred to as Status¶
Rule 3.8. Case Management Conference Procedure (Formerly Referred to as Status Conference) ................................................................................................................................ 48
Rule 3.9 — Telephone Appearances…¶
Rule 3.9. Telephone Appearances ................................................................................................. 51
Rule 3.10 — Sanctions…¶
Rule 3.10. Sanctions ....................................................................................................................... 51
Rule 3.11 — Issue Conference…¶
Rule 3.11. Issue Conference .......................................................................................................... 51
Rule 3.12 — Jury Fees…¶
Rule 3.12. Jury Fees ....................................................................................................................... 53
Rule 3.13 — Reporting of Court Proceedings in Civil Fast Track Departments…¶
Rule 3.13. Reporting of Court Proceedings in Civil Fast Track Departments ............................... 53
Rule 3.14 — Unlawful Detainer Trial Setting…¶
Rule 3.14. Unlawful Detainer Trial Setting ...................................................................................... 54
Rule 3.15 — Relief Following Breach of a Settlement Agreement in Limited Jurisdiction…¶
Rule 3.15. Relief Following Breach of a Settlement Agreement in Limited Jurisdiction Cases .... 55
Rule 3.16 — Complex Litigation Cases…¶
Rule 3.16. Complex Litigation Cases ............................................................................................. 56
Rule 3.17 — CEQA Claims…¶
Rule 3.17. CEQA Claims ................................................................................................................ 57
Rule 3.18 — Conforming…¶
Rule 3.18. Conforming Copies........................................................................................................ 57
Rule 3.19 — Unlawful Detainer Process…¶
Rule 3.19. Unlawful Detainer Process ............................................................................................. 57 Chapter 2. Civil Law and Motion ...........................................................................................58
Rule 3.40 — Law and Motion Calendar…¶
Rule 3.40. Law and Motion Calendar ............................................................................................. 58
Rule 3.41 — Hearing…¶
Rule 3.41. Hearing Dates................................................................................................................ 58
Rule 3.42 — Papers to Comply with State Rules…¶
Rule 3.42. Papers to Comply with State Rules .............................................................................. 58
Rule 3.43 — Tentative…¶
Rule 3.43. Tentative Ruling............................................................................................................. 59
Rule 3.44 — Remote Appearances for Law and Motion…¶
Rule 3.44. Remote Appearances for Law and Motion ................................................................... 60
Rule 3.45 — Reporting of Law and Motion…¶
Rule 3.45. Reporting of Law and Motion ........................................................................................ 60
Rule 3.46 — Civil Ex Parte Orders…¶
Rule 3.46. Civil Ex Parte Orders ..................................................................................................... 60
Rule 3.47 — Original Orders to Show Cause…¶
Rule 3.47. Original Orders to Show Cause .................................................................................... 61
Rule 3.48 —…¶
Rule 3.48. Continuances................................................................................................................. 61
Rule 3.49 — Calendar Matters Heard in Law and Motion Department…¶
Rule 3.49. Calendar Matters Heard in Law and Motion Department ............................................. 61
Rule 3.50 — Name Change Applications…¶
Rule 3.50. Name Change Applications .......................................................................................... 62
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 7 of 200
Page 9¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 3.51 — Motions…¶
Rule 3.51. Motions .......................................................................................................................... 62
Rule 3.52 — Uncontested Calendars…¶
Rule 3.52. Uncontested Calendars ................................................................................................. 63
Rule 3.53 — Written Orders…¶
Rule 3.53. Written Orders ............................................................................................................... 63
Rule 3.54 — Number of Attorneys Examining a Witness…¶
Rule 3.54. Number of Attorneys Examining a Witness .................................................................. 64 Chapter 3. Receivers ..............................................................................................................64
Rule 3.80 — Receivers…¶
Rule 3.80. Receivers ....................................................................................................................... 64 Chapter 4. Elisors ..................................................................................................................65
Rule 3.90 — Elisors…¶
Rule 3.90. Elisors ............................................................................................................................ 65 Chapter 5. Settlements and Settlement Conferences (Not Applicable To Family Law and Probate Matters) .................................................................................................................65
Rule 3.100 — Settlements…¶
Rule 3.100. Settlements .................................................................................................................. 65
Rule 3.101 — Settlement…¶
Rule 3.101. Settlement Conferences.............................................................................................. 65
Rule 3.102 — Special Needs Trusts…¶
Rule 3.102. Special Needs Trusts .................................................................................................. 66
Rule 3.103 — Special Bench Bar Settlement Conferences (BBSC)…¶
Rule 3.103. Special Bench Bar Settlement Conferences (BBSC) ................................................. 66 Chapter 6. ADR .......................................................................................................................66 (Not Applicable to Family Law Matters and Probate Matters) ..............................................66
Rule 3.200 — Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs…¶
Rule 3.200. Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs ................................................................... 66
Rule 3.201 — Mediation…¶
Rule 3.201. Mediation ..................................................................................................................... 69
Rule 3.202 — Judicial Arbitration…¶
Rule 3.202. Judicial Arbitration ....................................................................................................... 72
Rule 3.203 — Settlement Mentors…¶
Rule 3.203. Settlement Mentors ..................................................................................................... 74
Rule 3.204 — Neutral Case Evaluation…¶
Rule 3.204. Neutral Case Evaluation ............................................................................................. 75
Rule 3.205 — Temporary Judge Trial - Civil Division…¶
Rule 3.205. Temporary Judge Trial - Civil Division ........................................................................ 76
Rule 3.206 — Ethical and Practice Standards for ADR Panel Members…¶
Rule 3.206. Ethical and Practice Standards for ADR Panel Members .......................................... 77 Chapter 7. Discovery Motions and the Optional Discovery Facilitator Program ...............80
Rule 3.300 — Optional Discovery Facilitator Program…¶
Rule 3.300. Optional Discovery Facilitator Program ...................................................................... 80
Rule 3.301 — Discovery Motions and the Discovery Facilitator Program…¶
Rule 3.301. Discovery Motions and the Discovery Facilitator Program ......................................... 80 Title Four. Criminal Rules ......................................................................................................86 Division 1. Criminal ................................................................................................................86 Chapter 1. Criminal Department ............................................................................................86
Rule 4.01 — Electronic Recording in Misdemeanor and Infraction Cases…¶
Rule 4.01. Electronic Recording in Misdemeanor and Infraction Cases ........................................ 86
Rule 4.1 — Motions…¶
Rule 4.1. Motions ............................................................................................................................ 86
Rule 4.2 — Discovery…¶
Rule 4.2. Discovery ......................................................................................................................... 90
Rule 4.3 — Applications on Behalf of Inmates…¶
Rule 4.3. Applications on Behalf of Inmates ................................................................................... 90
Rule 4.4 — Violations of…¶
Rule 4.4. Violations of Probation..................................................................................................... 91 Rule 4.5. Reserved [REPEALED 1/1/18] ....................................................................................... 91 Rule 4.6. Relief from Forfeiture of Bail in Misdemeanor and Felony Cases. ................................. 91
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 8 of 200
Page 10¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 4.7 — Submitting Sensitive Exhibits…¶
Rule 4.7. Submitting Sensitive Exhibits .......................................................................................... 93
Rule 4.8 — Withdrawal of Time Waivers in Misdemeanor Cases…¶
Rule 4.8. Withdrawal of Time Waivers in Misdemeanor Cases ..................................................... 93 Chapter 2. Felony Direct Calendaring...................................................................................93
Rule 4.10 — Direct Calendaring in Felony…¶
Rule 4.10. Direct Calendaring in Felony Matters............................................................................. 93
Rule 4.11 — Arraignments; Assignment for All Purposes…¶
Rule 4.11. Arraignments; Assignment for All Purposes ................................................................. 93
Rule 4.12 — Reassignment by Presiding Judge…¶
Rule 4.12. Reassignment by Presiding Judge ................................................................................ 94 Division 2. Infractions .............................................................................................................94 Chapter 1. Infraction Rules ....................................................................................................94
Rule 4.40 — Filing…¶
Rule 4.40. Filing .............................................................................................................................. 94
Rule 4.41 — Court Sessions…¶
Rule 4.41. Court Sessions .............................................................................................................. 94
Rule 4.42 — Arraignments; Remote Appearance for Arraignments…¶
Rule 4.42. Arraignments; Remote Appearance for Arraignments ................................................. 94
Rule 4.43 — Demurrers…¶
Rule 4.43. Demurrers ...................................................................................................................... 95
Rule 4.44 — Withdrawal of Time Waivers in Infraction Cases…¶
Rule 4.44. Withdrawal of Time Waivers in Infraction Cases .......................................................... 95
Rule 4.45 —…¶
Rule 4.45. Continuances................................................................................................................. 95
Rule 4.46 — Juvenile Traffic Infraction Matters…¶
Rule 4.46. Juvenile Traffic Infraction Matters ................................................................................. 95 Chapter 2. Adjudication of Infraction Matters ......................................................................95
Rule 4.60 — Trial by Declaration for Traffic Infractions…¶
Rule 4.60. Trial by Declaration for Traffic Infractions ..................................................................... 95 Rule 4.61. Clerks’ Authority in Infraction Cases. ............................................................................ 96
Rule 4.62 — Prohibited Requests in Traffic Matters…¶
Rule 4.62. Prohibited Requests in Traffic Matters .......................................................................... 96
Rule 4.63 — Request for Ability to Pay Consideration and Civil Assessment Waiver…¶
Rule 4.63 Request for Ability to Pay Consideration and Civil Assessment Waiver ........................ 97
Rule 4.64 — Appeals…¶
Rule 4.64. Appeals .......................................................................................................................... 98 Chapter 3. Collections Program for Traffic Infraction Cases ..............................................98
Rule 4.80 — Court Collections Program…¶
Rule 4.80. Court Collections Program ............................................................................................ 98
Rule 4.81 — Application of Overpayment…¶
Rule 4.81. Application of Overpayment .......................................................................................... 99 Title Five. Family and Juvenile Rules ..................................................................................100 Division 1. Family Law Matters ............................................................................................100 Chapter 1. Family Law Department .....................................................................................100
Rule 5.0 — Application of Rules and…¶
Rule 5.0. Application of Rules and Definitions.............................................................................. 100
Rule 5.1 — Assignment of Departments and Matters…¶
Rule 5.1. Assignment of Departments and Matters ..................................................................... 100
Rule 5.2 — Obtaining Temporary Restraining Orders /Ex Parte Orders…¶
Rule 5.2. Obtaining Temporary Restraining Orders /Ex Parte Orders ........................................ 103
Rule 5.3 — Orders Shortening Time (OST)…¶
Rule 5.3. Orders Shortening Time (OST) ..................................................................................... 104
Rule 5.4 — Hearings…¶
Rule 5.4. Hearings ........................................................................................................................ 105
Rule 5.5 — Procedures to Complete Dissolution/Legal Separation…¶
Rule 5.5. Procedures to Complete Dissolution/Legal Separation ................................................ 108
Rule 5.6 — Case Management Conference / Family Centered Case Resolution Conference¶
Rule 5.6. Case Management Conference / Family Centered Case Resolution Conference (FCCRC) ................................................................................................................................... 109
Rule 5.7 — Mandatory Settlement Conference…¶
Rule 5.7. Mandatory Settlement Conference ............................................................................... 111
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 9 of 200
Page 11¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 5.8 — Recommendation Conference…¶
Rule 5.8. Recommendation Conference ...................................................................................... 113
Rule 5.9 — Trials…¶
Rule 5.9. Trials .............................................................................................................................. 113 (g) Removing Matter from Calendar .............................................................................................. 115
Rule 5.10 — Preparation and Presentation of Orders…¶
Rule 5.10. Preparation and Presentation of Orders ..................................................................... 115
Rule 5.11 — Judgments…¶
Rule 5.11. Judgments ................................................................................................................... 116
Rule 5.12 — Appointment of Elisor…¶
Rule 5.12. Appointment of Elisor .................................................................................................. 117
Rule 5.13 — Confidentiality…¶
Rule 5.13. Confidentiality .............................................................................................................. 118
Rule 5.14 — Family Law Facilitator…¶
Rule 5.14. Family Law Facilitator .................................................................................................. 118
Rule 5.15 — Temporary Spousal or Partner Support…¶
Rule 5.15. Temporary Spousal or Partner Support ...................................................................... 118
Rule 5.16 — Presence of Children in…¶
Rule 5.16. Presence of Children in Courtroom............................................................................ 119
Rule 5.17 — Family Court Services Appointments (Mediation, Information Gathering and Child¶
Rule 5.17. Family Court Services Appointments (Mediation, Information Gathering and Child Custody Recommended Counseling) ...................................................................................... 119
Rule 5.18 — Child Custody Evaluations…¶
Rule 5.18. Child Custody Evaluations .......................................................................................... 125 Rule 5.19. Court Communication for Domestic Violence and Child Custody Orders (Adopted Pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 5.445) ................................................................. 128 Rule 5.20. Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute. ............................................................................. 129 Division 2 – Juvenile Matters ...............................................................................................130 Chapter 1. Juvenile Department ..........................................................................................130
Rule 5.50 — Adoption, Construction and Amendment of Rules…¶
Rule 5.50. Adoption, Construction and Amendment of Rules ..................................................... 130
Rule 5.51 — Juvenile…¶
Rule 5.51. Juvenile Judge............................................................................................................. 130
Rule 5.52 — Juvenile Court Commissioner…¶
Rule 5.52. Juvenile Court Commissioner ..................................................................................... 131
Rule 5.53 — Motions…¶
Rule 5.53. Motions ........................................................................................................................ 133
Rule 5.54 — Appointment of Juvenile Court Appointed Counsel…¶
Rule 5.54. Appointment of Juvenile Court Appointed Counsel .................................................... 133
Rule 5.55 — Minute Order…¶
Rule 5.55. Minute Order ................................................................................................................ 133 Rule 5.56. REPEALED ................................................................................................................. 134
Rule 5.57 — Public Hearings…¶
Rule 5.57. Public Hearings ........................................................................................................... 134
Rule 5.58 — Records access by Court Appointed Special Advocate…¶
Rule 5.58. Records access by Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA)................................ 134
Rule 5.59 — Inter-Agency Exchange of Information…¶
Rule 5.59. Inter-Agency Exchange of Information ....................................................................... 134 Rule 5.60. REPEALED ................................................................................................................. 135
Rule 5.61 — Experience, Training, Education…¶
Rule 5.61. Experience, Training, Education ................................................................................. 135
Rule 5.62 — Screening for…¶
Rule 5.62. Screening for Competency.......................................................................................... 135
Rule 5.63 — Mediation…¶
Rule 5.63. Mediation ..................................................................................................................... 136
Rule 5.64 — Reciprocal Discovery…¶
Rule 5.64. Reciprocal Discovery ................................................................................................... 137
Rule 5.65 — Disclosure of Victim or Witness Contact…¶
Rule 5.65. Disclosure of Victim or Witness Contact Information.................................................. 137
Rule 5.66 — Notice Regarding Change in Placement for Dependents of the Court…¶
Rule 5.66. Notice Regarding Change in Placement for Dependents of the Court ...................... 138 Rule 5.67. REPEALED ................................................................................................................. 139
Rule 5.68 — Notice to Caregiver…¶
Rule 5.68. Notice to Caregiver ...................................................................................................... 139
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 10 of 200
Page 12¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 5.69 — Notice to Minor’s Counsel Regarding Subpoenas…¶
Rule 5.69. Notice to Minor’s Counsel Regarding Subpoenas ...................................................... 139
Rule 5.70 — Probation Reports Reporting Confirmed Information on AIDS and AIDS-Related¶
Rule 5.70. Probation Reports Reporting Confirmed Information on AIDS and AIDS-Related Diseases ................................................................................................................................... 139
Rule 5.71 — Court Appointed Special Advocates Program Guidelines…¶
Rule 5.71. Court Appointed Special Advocates Program Guidelines .......................................... 139
Rule 5.72 — Submission, Copying, and Distribution of CASA Reports; Access to CASA…¶
Rule 5.72. Submission, Copying, and Distribution of CASA Reports; Access to CASA Reports 140
Rule 5.73 — Assignment of Transfer Hearings…¶
Rule 5.73. Assignment of Transfer Hearings ............................................................................... 140
Rule 5.74 — Service of JV-790 on Victim…¶
Rule 5.74. Service of JV-790 on Victim ........................................................................................ 140
Rule 5.75 — Presence at Juvenile…¶
Rule 5.75. Presence at Juvenile Proceedings.............................................................................. 140 Title Six. Reserved ...............................................................................................................142 Title Seven. Probate Rules ..................................................................................................142 Chapter 1. General Provisions ............................................................................................142
Rule 7.1 — Probate Matters…¶
Rule 7.1. Probate Matters ............................................................................................................. 142
Rule 7.2 — Judicial Commitments…¶
Rule 7.2. Judicial Commitments ................................................................................................... 142
Rule 7.3 — Trust Fund Withdrawals…¶
Rule 7.3. Trust Fund Withdrawals ................................................................................................ 142
Rule 7.4 — Probate Rules…¶
Rule 7.4. Probate Rules ................................................................................................................ 142
Rule 7.5 — Reporting of Court Reporting in…¶
Rule 7.5. Reporting of Court Reporting in Probate....................................................................... 143 Chapter 2. Probate Court Proceedings ...............................................................................144
Rule 7.50 — Probate Calendar…¶
Rule 7.50. Probate Calendar ........................................................................................................ 144
Rule 7.51 — Contested Matters…¶
Rule 7.51. Contested Matters ....................................................................................................... 144
Rule 7.52 — Appearances…¶
Rule 7.52. Appearances ............................................................................................................... 145
Rule 7.53 — Verifications…¶
Rule 7.53. Verifications ................................................................................................................. 146
Rule 7.54 — Submission of Proposed Order Before Date of Hearing…¶
Rule 7.54. Submission of Proposed Order Before Date of Hearing ............................................ 146
Rule 7.55 — Responses to Tentative Rulings…¶
Rule 7.55. Responses to Tentative Rulings ................................................................................. 146
Rule 7.56 — Continuances to Cure Defective Pleadings or Procedures…¶
Rule 7.56. Continuances to Cure Defective Pleadings or Procedures ........................................ 147 Rule 7.57. JUDICIAL COUNCIL FORMS. REPEALED (See CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT,
Rule 7 — 101)…¶
RULE 7.101) ............................................................................................................................. 147
Rule 7.58 — Discretion to…¶
Rule 7.58. Discretion to Waive...................................................................................................... 147
Rule 7.59 — Fees…¶
Rule 7.59. Fees ............................................................................................................................. 147
Rule 7.60 — Record Title…¶
Rule 7.60. Record Title ................................................................................................................. 148
Rule 7.61 — Court Ordered Fees for Fiduciaries and Attorneys…¶
Rule 7.61. Court Ordered Fees for Fiduciaries and Attorneys ..................................................... 148
Rule 7.62 — Factual Allegations…¶
Rule 7.62. Factual Allegations ...................................................................................................... 149
Rule 7.63 — Guardian ad Litem…¶
Rule 7.63. Guardian ad Litem ....................................................................................................... 149
Rule 7.64 — Special Notice to Attorneys and Clients…¶
Rule 7.64. Special Notice to Attorneys and Clients ...................................................................... 149
Rule 7.65 — Coordination of Fee Petitions with Accountings…¶
Rule 7.65. Coordination of Fee Petitions with Accountings ......................................................... 150 Chapter 3. Petitions, Orders and Notices ...........................................................................151 Rule 7.100. Titles for Petitions and Orders [Repealed 1/1/03] ..................................................... 151
Rule 7.101 — Material to be Included in Formal Rulings…¶
Rule 7.101. Material to be Included in Formal Rulings ................................................................ 151
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 11 of 200
Page 13¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 7.102 — Written Response…¶
Rule 7.102. Written Response ...................................................................................................... 151 Rule 7.103. Reserved. [REPEALED 1/1/03] ............................................................................... 151
Rule 7.104 — Applications for Ex Parte Orders…¶
Rule 7.104. Applications for Ex Parte Orders ............................................................................... 151
Rule 7.105 — Petitions for Family Allowance…¶
Rule 7.105. Petitions for Family Allowance .................................................................................. 152
Rule 7.106 — Bond on Petitions for Authority to Borrow Money…¶
Rule 7.106. Bond on Petitions for Authority to Borrow Money ..................................................... 152
Rule 7.107 — Nunc Pro Tunc Orders Correcting Clerical Errors…¶
Rule 7.107. Nunc Pro Tunc Orders Correcting Clerical Errors .................................................... 152
Rule 7.108 — General Notice…¶
Rule 7.108. General Notice Requirements................................................................................... 153
Rule 7.109 — Probate Hearing Once Noticed Cannot be…¶
Rule 7.109. Probate Hearing Once Noticed Cannot be Advanced.............................................. 153
Rule 7.110 — Orders, etc., to be Complete…¶
Rule 7.110. Orders, etc., to be Complete ..................................................................................... 153
Rule 7.111 — Accounts and Reports…¶
Rule 7.111. Accounts and Reports ............................................................................................... 153
Rule 7.112 — Petitions to Show who is Entitled to Notice…¶
Rule 7.112. Petitions to Show who is Entitled to Notice ............................................................... 154 Rule 7.113. Identity or Whereabouts Unknown [Repealed 1/1/03] (see California Rules of Court, Rule 7.52) ................................................................................................................................. 154 Rule 7.114. Notice Regarding Interests of Deceased Persons [Repealed 1/1/03] (see California Rules of Court, Rule 7.51(e)) ................................................................................................... 154 Chapter 4. Appointment of Executors and Administrators ...............................................154
Rule 7.150 — Notice re: Special Letters…¶
Rule 7.150. Notice re: Special Letters .......................................................................................... 154
Rule 7.151 — Petitions for Probate of Will and for Letters Testamentary; for Letters of¶
Rule 7.151. Petitions for Probate of Will and for Letters Testamentary; for Letters of Administration; or for Letters of Administration with Will Annexed .......................................... 155
Rule 7.152 — Notice…¶
Rule 7.152. Notice ......................................................................................................................... 155
Rule 7.153 — Requirements of Publication for Notice of Petition to Administer Estate…¶
Rule 7.153. Requirements of Publication for Notice of Petition to Administer Estate ................. 157
Rule 7.154 — Court Discretion Regarding Bond…¶
Rule 7.154. Court Discretion Regarding Bond ............................................................................. 157
Rule 7.155 — Continuance to Permit Filing of Contest…¶
Rule 7.155. Continuance to Permit Filing of Contest ................................................................... 157
Rule 7.156 — Multiple Representatives…¶
Rule 7.156. Multiple Representatives ........................................................................................... 157 Chapter 5. Creditors’ Claims ...............................................................................................158
Rule 7.200 — Nature and Form of Claims…¶
Rule 7.200. Nature and Form of Claims ....................................................................................... 158 Rule 7.201. Claims Filed with Clerk and Mailed to Personal Representative [Repealed 1/1/03] (see California Rules of Court, Rule 7.401; Probate Code 9150) ........................................... 158
Rule 7.202 — Claims of Personal Representatives and Attorneys…¶
Rule 7.202. Claims of Personal Representatives and Attorneys ................................................. 158
Rule 7.203 — Funeral Claims…¶
Rule 7.203. Funeral Claims .......................................................................................................... 159 Chapter 6. Sales ...................................................................................................................159
Rule 7.250 — Sales of Real Property not under IAEA…¶
Rule 7.250. Sales of Real Property not under IAEA .................................................................... 159
Rule 7.251 — Return of Private Sale…¶
Rule 7.251. Return of Private Sale ............................................................................................... 159
Rule 7.252 — Broker’s Commissions…¶
Rule 7.252. Broker’s Commissions .............................................................................................. 160
Rule 7.253 — Broker’s Commissions in Overbid Situation…¶
Rule 7.253. Broker’s Commissions in Overbid Situation ............................................................. 160 Rule 7.254. Exclusive Listings for Sale of Property (Probate Code Section 10150(c) [Repealed 1/1/03] (see California Rules of Court, Rule 7.453) ................................................................. 160
Rule 7.255 — Condominiums, Community or Cooperative Apartments…¶
Rule 7.255. Condominiums, Community or Cooperative Apartments ......................................... 160
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 12 of 200
Page 14¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 7.256 — Purchase of Estate Property by Personal Representative or His or Her…¶
Rule 7.256. Purchase of Estate Property by Personal Representative or His or Her Attorney... 160
Rule 7.257 — Tangible Personal…¶
Rule 7.257. Tangible Personal Property....................................................................................... 161 Chapter 7. Accounts, Fees and Petition for Distribution ...................................................161
Rule 7.300 — Notice of Petition for Distribution…¶
Rule 7.300. Notice of Petition for Distribution ............................................................................... 161
Rule 7.301 — Property to be Distributed must be Listed…¶
Rule 7.301. Property to be Distributed must be Listed ................................................................. 161
Rule 7.302 — Form of Accounting…¶
Rule 7.302. Form of Accounting ................................................................................................... 162
Rule 7.303 — Waiver of Account…¶
Rule 7.303. Waiver of Account ..................................................................................................... 162 Rule 7.304. Statutory Fees and Allowable Costs [Repealed 1/1/03] (see California Rules of Court, Rule 7.705) .................................................................................................................... 162
Rule 7.305 — Inheritance by Surviving Spouse…¶
Rule 7.305. Inheritance by Surviving Spouse .............................................................................. 162
Rule 7.306 — Extraordinary Fees…¶
Rule 7.306. Extraordinary Fees .................................................................................................... 163
Rule 7.307 — The Order…¶
Rule 7.307. The Order .................................................................................................................. 163
Rule 7.308 — Segregating Trust Income and…¶
Rule 7.308. Segregating Trust Income and Principal................................................................... 163
Rule 7.309 — Creditor’s Claims…¶
Rule 7.309. Creditor’s Claims ....................................................................................................... 163
Rule 7.310 — Federal Estate Taxes…¶
Rule 7.310. Federal Estate Taxes ................................................................................................ 164
Rule 7.311 — Specifically Devised…¶
Rule 7.311. Specifically Devised Property.................................................................................... 164
Rule 7.312 — Distribution to Minors…¶
Rule 7.312. Distribution to Minors ................................................................................................. 165
Rule 7.313 — Preliminary Distribution…¶
Rule 7.313. Preliminary Distribution ............................................................................................. 165
Rule 7.314 — Procedure to be Followed by a Personal Representative in Actions for Damages¶
Rule 7.314. Procedure to be Followed by a Personal Representative in Actions for Damages Following Wrongful Death of Decedent or Other Actions that Survive the Death of Decedent .................................................................................................................................................. 165
Rule 7.315 — Grant of Additional Powers to Testamentary Trustee…¶
Rule 7.315. Grant of Additional Powers to Testamentary Trustee .............................................. 166
Rule 7.316 — Application for Final Discharge…¶
Rule 7.316. Application for Final Discharge ................................................................................. 166
Rule 7.317 — Payment of Costs of Administration…¶
Rule 7.317. Payment of Costs of Administration .......................................................................... 166 Chapter 8. Inventory and Appraisal ....................................................................................166
Rule 7.350 — Preparation of Inventory and Appraisal…¶
Rule 7.350. Preparation of Inventory and Appraisal .................................................................... 166
Rule 7.351 — Waiver of Appraisal by Probate Referee…¶
Rule 7.351. Waiver of Appraisal by Probate Referee .................................................................. 167 Chapter 9. Guardianships and Conservatorships .............................................................167 Guardianships .......................................................................................................................167
Rule 7.400 — Initiation of Guardianship Investigation…¶
Rule 7.400. Initiation of Guardianship Investigation ..................................................................... 167
Rule 7.401 — Temporary Guardianships…¶
Rule 7.401. Temporary Guardianships ........................................................................................ 167
Rule 7.402 — Consultation with Other Departments re: Custody or Dependency…¶
Rule 7.402. Consultation with Other Departments re: Custody or Dependency Proceedings.... 168
Rule 7.403 — Guardianships for Dependent Children…¶
Rule 7.403. Guardianships for Dependent Children .................................................................... 168
Rule 7.404 — Restriction on Parental Use of Minor’s Estate…¶
Rule 7.404. Restriction on Parental Use of Minor’s Estate .......................................................... 168
Rule 7.405 — Final Account of Guardian…¶
Rule 7.405. Final Account of Guardian ......................................................................................... 168
Rule 7.406 — Setting guardianship hearing when a temporary guardianship has NOT been¶
Rule 7.406. Setting guardianship hearing when a temporary guardianship has NOT been granted 169
Rule 7.407 — – Rule 7.410. Intentionally Omitted…¶
Rule 7.407. – Rule 7.410. Intentionally Omitted ........................................................................... 169
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 13 of 200
Page 15¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 7.411 — Appointment of Conservator…¶
Rule 7.411. Appointment of Conservator ..................................................................................... 169
Rule 7.412 — Ex Parte Petitions for Appointment of Temporary…¶
Rule 7.412. Ex Parte Petitions for Appointment of Temporary Conservatorships....................... 170
Rule 7.413 — Specific Medical Treatment and Placement…¶
Rule 7.413. Specific Medical Treatment and Placement ............................................................. 170
Rule 7.414 — Termination…¶
Rule 7.414. Termination ................................................................................................................ 171
Rule 7.415 — Accounts of Conservator…¶
Rule 7.415. Accounts of Conservator ........................................................................................... 171
Rule 7.416 — Orientation Class Requirements for Unlicensed Conservators…¶
Rule 7.416. Orientation Class Requirements for Unlicensed Conservators ................................ 171 Rule 7.417. Release of Information by Court Investigator for Benefit of Conservatees. ............. 172
Rule 7.418 — Intentionally Omitted…¶
Rule 7.418. Intentionally Omitted ................................................................................................... 172 Rule 7.419. Warning on Order [Repealed 1/1/03] ........................................................................ 172
Rule 7.420 — Copies for Court Investigator…¶
Rule 7.420. Copies for Court Investigator .................................................................................... 172 Rule 7.421. Intentionally Omitted and Reserved [Repealed 1/1/13] ............................................ 172
Rule 7.422 — Temporary Guardian or Conservator…¶
Rule 7.422. Temporary Guardian or Conservator ........................................................................ 172
Rule 7.423 — Instructions Regarding General Duties and Conflicts of Guardian or…¶
Rule 7.423. Instructions Regarding General Duties and Conflicts of Guardian or Conservator . 173
Rule 7.424 — Bonds of Conservators and Guardians…¶
Rule 7.424. Bonds of Conservators and Guardians .................................................................... 173
Rule 7.425 — Accounts…¶
Rule 7.425. Accounts .................................................................................................................... 173
Rule 7.426 — Conservator and Guardian Compensation and Attorney’s Fees…¶
Rule 7.426. Conservator and Guardian Compensation and Attorney’s Fees ............................. 174
Rule 7.427 — Independent Exercise of Powers…¶
Rule 7.427. Independent Exercise of Powers .............................................................................. 174
Rule 7.428 — Investments by Guardian or Conservator (Probate Code Section 2570 et seq.)…¶
Rule 7.428. Investments by Guardian or Conservator (Probate Code Section 2570 et seq.) .... 175
Rule 7.429 — Account Statements with…¶
Rule 7.429. Account Statements with Accountings...................................................................... 175 Chapter 10. Trusts................................................................................................................175
Rule 7.450 — Trustee Compensation, and Attorney’s Fees…¶
Rule 7.450. Trustee Compensation, and Attorney’s Fees ........................................................... 175
Rule 7.451 — Establishment of a…¶
Rule 7.451. Establishment of a Trust............................................................................................ 176
Rule 7.452 — Establishment of Special Needs Trust from Inheritance by Court Order…¶
Rule 7.452. Establishment of Special Needs Trust from Inheritance by Court Order ................. 176 Chapter 11. Protective Proceedings ...................................................................................177
Rule 7.501 — Proceeding for Spousal Property Transaction…¶
Rule 7.501. Proceeding for Spousal Property Transaction .......................................................... 177 Rule 7.502. Establishment of a Trust [Repealed 1/1/13].............................................................. 177 Chapter 12. Elisors...............................................................................................................177
Rule 7.520 — Elisors…¶
Rule 7.520. Elisors ........................................................................................................................ 177 Chapter 13. Guidelines for Probate Rules - Attachments .................................................178 Guideline, Attachment 1 – The ABCs of Dividing the Commission Pie in Probate Sales (includes chart) ......................................................................................................................................... 178 Guideline, Attachment 2 – Probate Department Fees and Costs Guidelines .............................. 179 FEES .............................................................................................................................................. 179 COSTS AND EXPENSES ............................................................................................................. 182 Guideline, Attachment 3 – Fee Declaration Template .................................................................. 183 Guideline, Attachment 4 – Probate Department Operations ........................................................ 185 Title Eight. Appellate Rules .................................................................................................187
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 14 of 200
Page 16¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Chapter 1. General Provision ..............................................................................................187
Rule 8.1 — Appellate Division…¶
Rule 8.1. Appellate Division .......................................................................................................... 187 JUDICIAL COUNCIL FORMS: ...............................................................................................197 APPENDIX A: STANDING ORDERS .....................................................................................200 NOTE: Standing Orders are subject to change. Orders included with the Local Rules are current as of 1/1/2025. For a current version of all standing orders, please see the Court’s Local Rules webpage: .........................................................................................200 https://www.cc-courts.org/general/local-rules.aspx ...........................................................200
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 15 of 200
Page 17¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Title One. General Governance of Judicial and Non-Judicial Court Operations
Chapter 1. Administrative Rules
Rule 1.1. Adoption and Amendment of Rules (a) Rules (1) These rules shall be known and cited as the Local Rules for the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa.
(2) These rules may be amended in accordance with the California Rules of Court.
(b) Good cause The Court, for good cause, may waive the application of these rules in an individual case. (Rule 1.1(b) revised effective 7/1/02) (Rule 1.1 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 1.2. Department Designations Certain departments shall operate under the following designations: Presiding Judge, Probate, Civil Litigation, Criminal, Juvenile, and Family Law, and they shall exercise the particular functions provided herein. There may be other departments as designated by the Presiding Judge. (Rule 1.2 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 1.3. Presiding Judge The Presiding Judge and Assistant Presiding Judge shall be selected and have the authority as provided in the California Rules of Court and shall serve for a term of two calendar years. (Rule 1.3 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 1.4. Executive Committee (a) The Executive Committee The Executive Committee shall consist of: the Presiding Judge, the Assistant Presiding Judge, the Supervising Judge of the Civil, Criminal, Juvenile, Family Law, and Probate Divisions; the Supervising Judges in branch court locations, and the immediate past Presiding Judge. The Presiding Judge shall preside over the proceedings of the Executive Committee, but shall not be entitled to vote except to break ties. (Rule 1.4(a) revised effective 1/1/24)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 16 of 200
Page 18¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(b) Duties of the Executive Committee (1) The Executive Committee shall review, in its discretion, the decisions and actions of the Presiding Judge and the Executive Officer and, where appropriate, recommend Court policy and procedures for implementation by the Presiding Judge and assist the Presiding Judge on all matters related to court administration.
(2) With the assistance of the Executive Officer, the Executive Committee shall adopt
an annual budget for submission to the Judicial Council.
(3) The Executive Committee shall review and approve the organizational structure
for the administration of the Court under the Court’s Executive Officer.
(4) The Executive Committee shall review and recommend major personnel and
administrative policies. Adoption of these policies shall be subject to the approval
of a majority of the judges of the Superior Court.
(Rule 1.4(b) revised effective 1/1/10)
(Rule 1.4 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 1.5. Definition of Vacation for Judge “A day of vacation” for a judge of the Contra Costa Superior Court is an approved absence of one full business day. Other absences from the court listed in California Rules of Court, Rule 10.603(c)(2) are excluded from this definition. (Rule 1.5 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 1.6. Activities Prohibited on Courthouse Grounds
(1) Commercial solicitation and distribution, posting, and displaying of commercial circulars and handbills inside any courthouse or court walkway is prohibited.
(2) No non-judicial foreclosure sale may be conducted on courthouse grounds. Courthouse grounds includes a courthouse itself, the steps of a courthouse, the sidewalk leading to an entrance to a courthouse on the same block as the courthouse, and any other path of pedestrian movement to a courthouse from a roadway or parking lot adjacent to that courthouse. Violations of this rule subject the offending party to sanctions in an amount up to $1,500 per violation pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 177.5.
(Rule 1.6 new effective 7/1/20)
Chapter 2. Media Coverage
Rule 1.20. Media Coverage These procedures are adopted by the Court for the protection of all parties to ensure the secure and efficient handling of cases and events in all courtrooms of the Superior Court for Contra Costa
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 17 of 200
Page 19¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
County and related facilities including all buildings containing courtrooms. No filming, photography or electronic recording is permitted in the courthouses except as permitted in the courthouse or the courtroom consistent with California Rules of Court, Rule 1.150 and this Local Court Rule. Violation of this rule may result in termination of media coverage, removal of equipment, contempt of court proceedings, or monetary sanctions as provided by law. (Rule 1.20 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 1.21. Requests for Coverage Requests for any type of video, still photography, or audio coverage, including pool cameras, must be made in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 1.150(e)(1), and submitted to the judicial officer assigned to hear the case on the, “Media Request to Photograph, Record, or Broadcast,” (Judicial Council Form MC-500) accompanied by the, “Order on Media Request to Permit Coverage” (Judicial Council Form MC-510). For such requests that do not involve a courtroom, they must be submitted to the Presiding Judge on the same forms. (Rule 1.21 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 1.22. Limitation on Coverage The following limitations apply, unless an exception is expressly permitted by written judicial order or as permitted by rule 1.25.
(1) Videotaping, photographing, or electronic recording by the media and/or the general public is not permitted in any part of the courthouse, including but not limited to, lobby areas, halls, stairs, elevators, clerks’ windows, or meeting rooms.
(2) Videotaping, photographic equipment, and electronic recording devices must be turned off while transporting them in any area of the Court.
(3) All audible electronic devices must be turned off when they are in courtrooms.
(4) Any photography of the interior of a courtroom through glass door windows or from between the two sets of doors to a courtroom is prohibited, even if an exception is granted for courthouse areas outside of the courtroom.
(5) When audio and/or video recording is not permitted by the judicial officer assigned to hear a case, electronic recording devices may be taken into the courtroom, only if they are not turned on and remain inside an enclosed case, bag or other container, unless otherwise prohibited by the judicial officer assigned to the case. (Rule 1.22 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 1.23. Prohibited Coverage In no event will coverage be allowed as to any of the following: [see California Rule or Court 1.150(e)(6)]
(1) A proceeding closed to the public (e.g., juvenile cases);
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 18 of 200
Page 20¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(2) Jurors or spectators;
(3) Jury selection;
(4) Conferences between an attorney and client, witness, or aide;
(5) Conferences between attorneys;
(6) Conferences between counsel and a judicial officer at the bench (“sidebars”); or
(7) Proceedings held in chambers. (Rule 1.23 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 1.24. Parking Limitations for Media Vehicles No media vehicles may be parked in an unauthorized place surrounding the courthouse except with permission from the Presiding Judge. If at any time any vehicle is parked improperly, without such permission, the order permitting photographic and/or electronic coverage, in regard to the operator of that vehicle, may be revoked without further hearing. (Rule 1.24 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 1.25. Areas in Court Facilities Where Media Activities are Authorized Photos, news conferences, and on-camera statements to members of the media or the general public are allowed only in areas specified for that purpose. The following areas are allowed unless otherwise ordered by the Presiding Judge. Requests for exceptions must be made to the Presiding Judge.
(1) Wakefield Taylor Courthouse [725 Court Street, Martinez]. Front steps and sidewalk area as long as entering or exiting through the related doorways is not blocked in any way.
(2) A. F. Bray Courthouse [1020 Ward Street, Martinez]. Northwest end of the courthouse near the flag pole and the southeast end of the courthouse near the wooden bench.
(3) A. F. Bray Courthouse - Court Annex [entrance southeast of entry to courthouse]. Exterior entry to courtrooms or jail as long as access to the exterior entrance to the courthouse is not blocked in any way.
(4) Peter L. Spinetta Family Law Center [751 Pine Street, Martinez]. Front plaza and outside stairs as long as access to the exterior entrance to the courthouse is not blocked in any way.
(5) Richard E. Arnason Justice Center [1000 Center Drive, Pittsburg]. Area outside front foyer as long as the entrance is not blocked in any way.
(6) George D. Carroll Courthouse [100 37th Street, Richmond]. Courtyard in front of entrance to the courthouse as long as the entrance is not blocked in any way. [Access to adjacent County Health Building also may not be blocked or impacted in any way.]
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 19 of 200
Page 21¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(7) Walnut Creek Superior Court [640 Ygnacio Valley Road, Walnut Creek]. Southside sidewalk area to the west of the entry doors as long as the entrance is not blocked in any way.
Access to the courthouse means that a person or persons entering or leaving the building can pass by easily maintaining a distance of at least five feet between himself or herself and the media, interviewee, and any spectators to the media interview or conference. (Rule 1.25 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 1.26. Video Recording and Still Photography Unless otherwise specifically prohibited by a judicial officer, video recording and still photography are allowed for non-adversarial proceedings such as weddings or adoptions. (Rule 1.26 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 1.27. Body Worn Cameras Police officers with body worn cameras shall not activate the recording function of the camera in the courthouse unless involved in a law enforcement activity that involves conducting or assisting in an arrest. (Rule 1.27 new effective 1/1/18)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 20 of 200
Page 22¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Title Two. General and Administrative Rules
Chapter 1. Jurors
Rule 2.1. Selection of Prospective Jurors
Jury service, unless expressly excused by law, is a responsibility of citizenship. It is the court’s obligation to employ all necessary and appropriate means to assure that citizens fulfill this vital civic function. Persons qualified to perform the public duty of jury service shall not be excused from such service except for the causes specified by Code of Civil Procedure Section 204.
In accordance with Code of Civil Procedure §190, et seq., there is hereby established one county-wide geographical selection area for the purpose of producing juror summons lists for the court.
The Jury Commissioner shall be fair and impartial in the selection of prospective jurors, using the methods and processes under the supervision and control of the Court, best suited for these purposes. No prospective juror shall be rejected because of political affiliation, religious faith, disability, race, ethnicity, national origin, social or economic status, occupation, gender, sexual orientation, or gender identity.
(Rule 2.1 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 2.2. Juror Source Lists The names of prospective trial jurors shall be taken from the last published and available registered voters list of Contra Costa County, the Franchise Tax Board, and the Department of Motor Vehicles list (see California Code of Civil Procedure §197(b)). The name of each prospective trial juror shall be taken by random selection from the merged source lists. The program for random selection may be designed and maintained by a third-party vendor, with approval of the Jury Commissioner (Code of Civ. Proc. §195(a)), to ensure the random selection of a fair cross section of the persons residing in Contra Costa County. (Rule 2.2 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 2.3. Determining Juror Qualifications, Excluding Prospective Jurors The Jury Commissioner shall determine the statutory qualifications of each prospective juror and the existence of any illness or ailments which would impair due performance of jury duty. The Jury Commissioner shall exclude from service those who are not competent to serve by law. (Rule 2.3 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 2.4. Statutory Excusals of Jurors The Jury Commissioner may grant an excuse from jury service prospective jurors who qualify for excusal pursuant to statute and the California Rules of Court. Before granting or refusing any excuse from jury service, the Jury Commissioner shall fairly weigh and consider all pertinent data, documents and information submitted by or on behalf of the prospective juror and may require
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 21 of 200
Page 23¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
any person to answer under oath, orally or in written form, questions necessary to determine the person’s qualifications and ability to serve as a prospective trial juror. (Rule 2.4 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 2.5. Temporary Deferment of Service
It is the intent of these rules and the policy of the court that, if a juror is excused for a reason that is temporary in nature, jury service must be deferred to future date when the excuse no longer applies.
(Rule 2.5 new effective 1/1/24)
Rule 2.6. Employment While Serving as Juror The Court, counsel and litigants are entitled to the full attention of jurors and therefore jurors are not permitted to engage in any employment or occupation that would affect their ability to properly serve as jurors. Jurors should attend work on days that court is not in session. The Court is unable to pay or provide a work certificate on days jurors were not ordered to be present. (Rule 2.6 revised and renumbered effective 1/1/24)
Rule 2.7. Period of Juror Service Jurors and prospective jurors shall be excused from further service or further call after they have appeared for one day or served upon a jury, unless otherwise directed by the Court, until summoned again. (Rule 2.6 revised and renumbered effective 1/1/24)
Rule 2.8. Juror Telephone Standby The Jury Commissioner shall utilize telephone standby for prospective jurors whenever practicable. Prospective jurors placed on telephone standby shall be given credit for service. Telephone standby jurors will not receive compensation. Jurors placed on telephone standby will not receive a work certificate unless a request is received from the juror's employer stating they would like documentation the juror was on phone standby. (Rule 2.7 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 2.9. Jury Assembly Room A jury assembly room has been provided for prospective jurors. Attorneys, litigants or witnesses are not permitted in the jury assembly room. (Rule 2.8) revised effective 1/1/24)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 22 of 200
Page 24¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Chapter 2. Grand Jury
Rule 2.30. Grand Jury Impanelment A Grand Jury shall be drawn and impaneled once each fiscal year by the appointed Grand Jury Supervising Judge. (Rule 2.30 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 2.31. Solicitation for Grand Jury Applications (1) On or before the first court day in March, the Jury Commissioner shall seek applications for appointment to the Grand Jury as follows:
(A) Mail or email notices to all relevant media outlets and public agencies;
(B) Post the application and information about grand jury service on the court’s
website at: www.cc-courts.org/grandjury
(C) Solicit referrals from social, community and political groups; and
(D) Solicit referrals from Judges and former Grand Jurors.
(2) All persons who submit an application are to receive a formal questionnaire which
must be returned no later than April 15 of that year. This questionnaire will be
available to anyone upon request from the Superior Court’s Executive Office.
(Rule 2.31(2) revised effective 1/1/24)
(Rule 2.31 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 2.32. Grand Jury Qualifications The Grand Jury Supervising Judge will assess the qualifications of each application according to the criteria specified under Part 2, Title 4, Chapter 2, Articles 1 and 2 of the Penal Code, and the referenced sections of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Grand Jury Supervising Judge shall make such preliminary investigation of the applicants as may be directed by the Grand Jury Selection Committee. (Rule 2.32 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 2.33. Grand Jury Selection Committee The Grand Jury shall be selected in accordance with the standards and requirements of law. Accordingly, the Presiding Judge will appoint a Grand Jury Selection Committee of at least four (4) Judges. The selection process will be administered as follows:
(1) The Selection Committee will oversee the process by which applications are selected, making every reasonable effort to ensure proportional representation from supervisorial districts and sociological group representation.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 23 of 200
Page 25¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(2) The Selection Committee Judges will interview applicants, allotting fifteen (15) minutes to each applicant. After all interviews are conducted, the Grand Jury Supervising Judge will prepare a final list of thirty (30) nominees.
(3) The thirty (30) nominees will be invited to an Impanelment ceremony where their names will be randomly drawn by the Court. The nineteen (19) Civil Grand Jurors selected, and alternates, will be sworn on the same day. The names shall constitute the Grand Jury list which shall be filed with the County Clerk and made a public record. (Rule 2.33 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 2.34. Additional Grand Jury The Grand Jury Supervising Judge may order and direct the impanelment, at any time, of one additional Grand Juror (see Penal Code Section 904.6). (Rule 2.34 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 2.35. Sealing of Grand Jury Transcript The filing party must serve all Motions to Seal a Grand Jury Transcript on all parties and the court reporter(s). When an Order is issued by the Court to seal a Grand Jury transcript, in whole or in part, the prevailing party must serve the Order on all parties and the court reporter(s). (Rule 2.35 revised effective 1/1/15)
Chapter 3. Attorney’s Fees and Appointment of Counsel
Rule 2.40. Attorney's Fee Schedule The following fee schedule is established for all cases where the obligation sued provides for attorney's fees, EXCEPT in Unlawful Detainer actions. This schedule will be used by the Clerk and the Court respectively to fix attorney's fees in default judgments entered pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 585 or judgment by the Court pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 437c.
In Unlawful Detainer actions, and Judgments pursuant to Section 437c, the attorney's fee shall be fixed at the sum of $375.00 or at a fee set pursuant to the schedule, whichever is greater.
FEE SCHEDULE
MINIMUM AMOUNT MAXIMUM AMOUNT FEE $1.00 TO $500.00 $150.00 501.00 TO 1,000.00 $150 plus 30% on amount over $500 1,001.00 TO 2,000.00 $300 plus 25% on amount over $1,000
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 24 of 200
Page 26¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
2,001.00 TO 5,000.00 $550 plus 10% on amount over $2,000 5,001.00 TO 10,000.00 $850 plus 6% on amount over $5,000 10,001.00 TO 50,000.00 $1,150 plus 3% on amount over $10,000 50,001.00 TO 100,000.00 $2,350 plus 2% on amount over $50,000 100,001.00 and over $3,350 plus 1% on amount over $100,000 (Rule 2.40 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 2.41. Schedule for Use Entering Default Judgment When the Clerk is authorized by statute to enter judgment in an action upon a contract providing for an attorney's fee, the foregoing schedule of attorney's fees in default cases shall be used by the Clerk in determining the amount to be included in the judgment, but in no event shall the amount included by the Clerk exceed the amount of attorney's fees requested. (Rule 2.41 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 2.42. Setting Attorney Fees in Contested Case The judge shall have complete discretion in setting attorney's fees contingent upon all the attendant circumstances. (Rule 2.42 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 2.43. Attorney Fees in Foreclosure Cases When an attorney's fee is allowed on the foreclosure of a mortgage or trust deed, a reasonable attorney's fee shall be deemed to be that computed as provided in Local Court Rule 2.40, increased by ten (10) percent. (Rule 2.43 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 2.44. Itemization of Extraordinary Services Every application for compensation for extraordinary services rendered by an attorney in any case mentioned in this rule and every application in any other case, as authorized by law, for allowance, fixing or recovery of attorney's fees, shall be accompanied by an itemized statement of the services rendered. (Rule 2.44 revised effective 1/1/16)
Chapter 4. Court Reporting Services
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 25 of 200
Page 27¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 2.50. Electronic Recording Pursuant to Government Code section 69957, in limited civil actions and criminal misdemeanor and infraction proceedings, the court, at its sole discretion, may utilize electronic recording as a means of generating a verbatim record of proceedings. In those instances, court reporters will not be provided. (Rule 2.50 new effective 1/1/19)
Rule 2.51. Notice of Availability of Court Reporting Services General information concerning the availability of court reporters is set forth in the Court’s Notice of Availability of Court Reporting Services, which is posted in the Clerk’s Office and on the Court’s website. (Rule 2.51 renumbered and revised effective 1/1/19)
Rule 2.52. Unavailability of Court-Provided Court Reporters and Procurement of Outside Private Reporters (a) Rule 2.52, subsections (b), (c), and (d) shall not apply to any proceeding for which a timely request for a court-provided court reporter has been received from a litigant who has been granted a fee waiver under Government Code section 68631 et seq. (b) Unavailability of court reporters by case type Unless otherwise noted in the Court’s Notice of Availability, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956, the Court does not provide court reporters for hearings in the following civil case types:
(1) Unlimited and Limited Civil
(2) Probate
(c) Procurement of private court reporter For matters where the court does not provide a court reporter due to unavailability, any party who desires a verbatim record of a court proceeding from which a transcript can later be prepared, may procure the services of a private certified court reporter pro tempore to report any scheduled hearing or trial (see Government Code section 70044 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956). The Court does not provide referrals to private court reporting service providers and does not have any contractual or employment obligation related to pro tempore reporters hired by the parties for this purpose. It is the party’s responsibility to arrange for and pay the outside reporter’s fee for attendance at the proceedings but the expense may be recoverable as part of the costs, as provided by law. (See California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956(c).)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 26 of 200
Page 28¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(d) Requirement to meet and confer to select court reporter For contested matters, the parties must meet timely and confer as to the selection of a qualified court reporter and, at the time of the proceeding to be reported, the party procuring the qualified court reporter must provide a proposed order appointing the reporter on Form CV-311 for the Court’s signature (see Government Code sections 68086 and 70044).
(1) The reporter must be licensed as a Certified Shorthand Reporter in California and
comply with all California statutory and rule provisions for reporting court
proceedings. The court reporter pro tempore must provide their name, CSR
number, business address, phone number, and e-mail address to the courtroom
clerk and all parties present on the day of the hearing in the event of an appeal or
if a party wishes to procure a transcript from the reporter (see California Rules of
Court, Rule 2.950).
(2) The court reporter pro tempore must execute the court’s required written
agreement as to the obligations of the court reporter in accepting the reporting
assignment.
(3) If court reporters become available and at the court’s discretion are provided by
the court for any civil hearings (including family law and probate matters), the
parties will be required to pay the applicable reporter attendance fee provided for
in Government Code sections 68086(a)(1)(A) and (B) in a timely manner, except
any party who has been granted a fee waiver under Government Code section
68631 et seq.
(Rule 2.52(d) revised effective 7/1/19)
Rule 2.53. Court-Provided Court Reporters in Cases Involving Fee Waiver Litigants Upon receipt of a timely request from a litigant who has been granted a fee waiver under Government Code section 68631 et seq., the Court shall provide a court reporter as follows. In all such instances, parties who have not been granted a fee waiver will be required to pay any applicable court reporter attendance fee, pursuant to Government Code section 68086. (a) Unlimited Civil Cases (1) Case Management Conferences. A request for a court-provided court reporter is timely if it is made three or more calendar days before the case management conference is to be held. The request must be made by filing Local Court Form MC-30.
(2) Law and Motion Hearings. A request for a court-provided court reporter is timely if
it is made at or before 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. The
request may be made by e-mail, fax, or telephone to the department holding the
hearing. The Court will not provide a court reporter for any law and motion hearing
where the tentative ruling has not been contested.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 27 of 200
Page 29¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(3) Issue Conferences. A request for a court-provided court reporter is timely if it is
made three or more calendar days before the issue conference is to be held. The
request must be made by filing Local Court Form MC-30.
(4) Trials. A request for a court-provided court reporter should be made at the issue
conference. A request for a court-provided court reporter otherwise is timely if it is
made on Local Court Form MC-30 three calendar days before trial is scheduled to
begin.
(5) All Other Proceedings. A request for a court-provided court reporter is timely if filed
on Local Court Form MC-30 at least three calendar days before the scheduled
date of the proceeding.
(6) Continuances. Failure to timely request a court reporter pursuant to these rules
shall not, standing alone, constitute grounds to continue any proceeding, absent
good cause shown.
(b) Probate Cases (1) Requests. A request for a court-provided court reporter is timely if received by 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. The request must be made on Local Court Form MC-30, and can be sent to the department hearing the matter by fax or e-mail.
(2) Continuances. If, in the exercise of due diligence, a litigant would not have been
able to ascertain that a proceeding would be contested in time to make a timely
request under Local Rule 2.53(c)(1), and that litigant has been granted a fee waiver
under Government Code section 68631 et seq., the court may grant a continuance
so that a court-provided court reporter may be provided.
(c) Enlargement of Time During Staff Shortages During periods of staff shortages when the Clerk’s Office may be unable to meet all of the court reporting requests and requirements that are pending, the Clerk of the Court may enlarge the periods during which a request for a court-provided court reporter may be deemed timely. Any such change to the periods will be posted in the Notice of Availability of Court Reporting Services (referenced in Rule 2.51) at least three calendar days before the effective date of any modifications to Rule 2.53, subdivisions (a), (b), and (c). The change may be effective for no more than five calendar days, after which the time periods specified under Rule 2.53, subdivisions (a), (b), and (c) will be restored. (Rule 2.53 revised 1/1/20)
Rule 2.54. Transcripts and Electronic Recording Whenever a party requests a court reporter to furnish a transcript of all or a part of a trial or proceedings, the reporter shall immediately inform all other parties of such request and inquire whether any party desires a copy of the transcript.
Parties shall be responsible for all transcript costs listed in Government Code section 69953.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 28 of 200
Page 30¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
If a proceeding has been electronically recorded pursuant to Government Code section 69957 and Local Rule 2.50, the parties to such proceeding may obtain a copy of the recording at Court Records. Parties will be responsible for all associated fees and costs. (Rule 2.54 revised and renumbered effective 1/1/19)
Chapter 5. Sanctions
Rule 2.60. Sanctions A violation of any of these rules may result in sanctions and penalties including, but not limited to, dropping a matter from the calendar, vacating a trial date, dismissal for lack of prosecution, imposition of a fine or imposition of costs payable to the Court, actual expenses and counsel fees, witness fees and jury fees arising as a result of such violation payable to opposing counsel. (Rule 2.60 revised effective 1/1/16)
Chapter 6. Information and Forms
Rule 2.70. Form of Documents Filed with the Court All documents filed with the Court must comply with California Rules of Court, Rules 2.100 et seq., and 3.1110. (Rule 2.70 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 2.71. Identifying Information on Filed Documents (a) Every pleading or paper filed by the Clerk of the Court must include the name, address and phone number of the attorney or party on the first page (see California Rules of Court,
Rule 2 — 100).¶
Rule 2.100).
(b) No substitution of a party appearing in person in place of an attorney shall be filed unless the mailing address and phone number of such party is contained in such substitution. (Rule 2.71 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 2.72. Retention of Completed Copy Requests All copy orders completed by the Court Records Division for Civil and/or Family law matters will be retained for sixty (60) days from the date when the customer is notified that the copy request has been completed. If the order is not claimed and any outstanding fee is not paid by the end of the 60-day period, the copied records may be destroyed. (Rule 2.72 new effective 7/1/18)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 29 of 200
Page 31¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 2.73. Access/View a Court File The public may request and view a file by filling out the required form and providing a valid state or federally issued photo identification that the clerk will retain during the review process. Upon return of the court file to the clerk, the clerk will return the tendered identification.
All files must be reviewed within the Court Clerk’s Office and/or Court Records Department. Files cannot be removed from the Court. Any person who willfully removes, destroys or alters any court record is subject to the penalties imposed by Government Code Sections 6200 and 6201. (Rule 2.73 new effective 1/1/19)
Chapter 7. Mandatory Electronic Filing and Service
Rule 2.87 — Adoption of Mandatory Electronic Filing and Service; Exceptions.¶
Rule 2.87. Adoption of Mandatory Electronic Filing and Service; Exceptions.
(a) Mandatory Electronic Filing and Service.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6(d) and Rules 2.252 and 2.253 of the California Rules of Court, the Court adopts mandatory electronic filing and service in Designated Cases. Designated Cases will be announced on the Court’s website at www.cc-courts.org. The Court anticipates initially listing Designated Cases in approximately March 2022, to include the majority of case types excluding Criminal and Juvenile matters. Represented parties in Designated Cases must file documents and allow for service electronically.
At the time the Court includes a case type among Designated Cases, this Rule shall supersede any other rules herein which may refer to filing by other-than-electronic means, except that those other rules shall apply to parties excepted from this rule as set forth below.
(b) Exceptions
(1) Self-Represented Litigants.
This rule shall not apply to self-represented litigants, but self-represented litigants
are permitted and encouraged to electronically file and serve documents if they
so elect.
(2) Motion for Exemption from Mandatory Electronic Filing and Service
Any party may move the Court for an order exempting it from the provisions of
this Rule. The motion shall be made on Judicial Council form EFS-007, Request
for Exemption from Mandatory Electronic Filing and Service, on which the
applicant shall state facts supporting the request under penalty of perjury, and
shall by accompanied by EFS-008, Order of Exemption from Electronic Filing and
Service.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 30 of 200
Page 32¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(c) Designated Vendors
A list of approved vendors for electronic filing and service will be published to the Court’s website.
(d) Electronic Service Address; Obligation to Update
Each represented party – and self-represented party upon election to participate in electronic filing and service – must provide an electronic address for service on the first occasion that party files any paper electronically. A party whose electronic service address changes while their case is pending must promptly notify the Court and all parties by electronically filing a notice of change of electronic service address or Judicial Council form EFS-010, Notice to Change Electronic Service Address.
(e) Format of Electronically-Filed Documents; Electronic Signatures
Electronically-filed documents must comply with the format requirements of Rule 2.100 et seq. of the California Rules of Court. Signatures on electronic documents must comply with Rule 2.257 of the California Rules of Court.
(f) Parties Responsible for Redaction
Rule 1.201 of the California Rules of Court applies to redaction of electronically-filed documents other than documents which are filed in their entirety either confidentially or under seal. Parties and their counsel are solely responsible for redacting personally - identifiable, confidential, or privileged information from documents filed electronically where redaction is required. The Clerk will not review electronically-filed documents for compliance with redaction requirements of any kind. The Court may impose sanctions for violations of this rule.
(g) Documents That Cannot Be Electronically Filed
Upon announcing any Designated Cases, the Court will also list any documents that cannot be electronically filed in the respective case type(s). Such documents shall be filed as otherwise provided in these Rules.
(Rule 2.87, new effective 1/1/22)
Chapter 8. Standards of Professional Courtesy
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 31 of 200
Page 33¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 2.90. Consideration of History of Breaches in Professional Courtesy The Court acknowledges that the Contra Costa County Bar Association has adopted "Standards of Professional Courtesy," which are incorporated in these Local Court Rules.
In any motion filed pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 128, 128.7, 177 and 177.5 and various local rules, the Court may take into consideration counsel's history of breaches of these standards in deciding what, if any, sanctions to impose. (Rule 2.90 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 2.91. Standards of Professional Courtesy (a) Purpose of these standards Attorneys are most often retained to represent their clients in disputes. The practice of law is largely an adversarial process. Attorneys are ethically bound to zealously represent and advocate their clients' interest. Nonetheless, there exist certain standards of professional courtesy that are observed, and certain duties of professionalism are owed by attorneys to their clients, opposing parties and their counsel, the Courts and other tribunals, and the public as a whole. Members of the Contra Costa County Bar Association have practiced law with a level of professionalism that goes well beyond the requirements of the State Bar mandated Code of Professional Conduct. The following standards of professional courtesy describe the conduct preferred and expected by a majority of attorneys practicing in Contra Costa County in performing their duties of civility, professional integrity, personal dignity, candor, diligence, respect, courtesy, cooperation and competence. These standards are not meant to be exhaustive. They should, however, set a tone or guide for conduct not specifically mentioned in these standards. (b) Professional courtesy standards These standards have been codified to make the level of professionalism reflected in them the standard for practice within Contra Costa County, with the hope that their dissemination will educate new attorneys and others who may be unfamiliar with the customary local practices. These Standards have received the approval of the Board of Directors of the Contra Costa County Bar Association. They have also been endorsed by the Judges of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, who expect professional conduct by all attorneys who appear and practice before them. They will be considered by those judges in their rulings pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 128, 128.7, 177, and 177.5, as provided for in Local Court Rule 2.90.
All attorneys conducting any practice of law in Contra Costa County are encouraged to comply with the spirit of these standards and not simply blindly adhere to the strict letter of them. The goals stated and inherent herein are equally applicable to all attorneys regardless of area of practice.
(c) Conformity with other statutes or rules
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 32 of 200
Page 34¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
This Code is not a substitute for the statutes and rules, and no provision of this Code is intended to be a method to extend time limitations of statutes and rules, including fast track time limitations, without appropriate court order.
(Rule 2.91 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 2.120. Scheduling (a) Advance notice of scheduling activities (1) Attorneys should communicate with opposing counsel before scheduling depositions, hearings, meetings and other proceedings and make reasonable efforts to schedule such meetings, hearings, depositions, and other proceedings by agreement whenever possible, at all times attempting to provide opposing counsel, parties, witnesses and other affected persons, sufficient notice.
(2) Where such advanced efforts at scheduling are not feasible (for example, in an
emergency, or in other circumstances compelling more expedited scheduling, or
upon agreement of counsel) an attorney should not arbitrarily or unreasonably
withhold consent to a request for scheduling accommodations that do not prejudice
their clients or unduly delay a proceeding.
(b) Sufficient time to complete proceedings In all cases an attorney should attempt to reserve sufficient time for the completion of the proceeding to permit a complete presentation by counsel for all parties. (c) Avoid continuances or undue delays in scheduling An attorney should not engage in delay tactics in scheduling meetings, hearings and discovery. An attorney should not seek extensions or continuances for the purpose of harassment or solely to extend litigation. (d) Notice of scheduling conflicts Attorneys should notify opposing counsel, the Court and others affected, of scheduling conflicts as soon as they become apparent and shall cooperate in canceling or rescheduling. An attorney should notify opposing counsel and, if appropriate, the Court or other tribunal, as early as possible of any resolutions between the parties that renders a scheduled hearing, position or meeting unnecessary or otherwise moot. (e) Requests for time extensions Consistent with existing law and court orders, attorneys should grant reasonable requests by opposing counsel for extensions of time within which to respond to pleadings, Discovery and other matters when such an extension will not prejudice their client or unduly delay a proceeding.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 33 of 200
Page 35¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(f) Disclosure of identity of witnesses Attorneys should cooperate with opposing counsel during trials and evidentiary hearings by disclosing the identities of all witnesses reasonably expected to be called and the length of time needed to present their entire case, except when a client’s material rights would be adversely affected. They should also cooperate with the calling of witnesses out of turn when the circumstances justify it. (g) Time and manner of service of papers The timing and manner of service of papers should not be calculated to disadvantage, overwhelm or embarrass the party receiving the papers. An attorney should not serve papers simply to take advantage of an opponent’s known absence from the office or at a time or in a manner designed to inconvenience the adversary, such as late in the day (after normal business hours), or so close to a court appearance that it inhibits the ability of opposing counsel to prepare for that appearance or to respond to the papers (if permitted by law), or in such other way as would unfairly limit the other party’s opportunity to respond to those papers or other matters pending in the action. (Rule 2.120 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 2.121. Discovery (a) Purpose of Discovery Attorneys should pursue discovery requests that are reasonably related to the matter at issue. Attorneys should not use Discovery for the purpose of harassing, embarrassing or causing the adversary to incur unnecessary expenses, as a means of delaying the timely, efficient and cost-effective resolution of a dispute, or to obtain unfair advantage. (b) Response to requests for discovery Attorneys should ensure that responses to reasonable discovery requests are timely, organized, complete and consistent with the obvious intent of the request. Attorneys responding to document demands and interrogatories should not do so in an artificial manner designed to assure that answers and responses are not truly responsive or solely to attempt to avoid disclosure. (c) Discovery questions Attorneys should avoid repetitive or argumentative questions, questions asked solely for purposes of harassment, or questions which are known to the questioner to be an invasion of the rights of privacy of third parties not present or represented at the deposition. (d) Conduct of deposition proceedings Attorneys should bear in mind that depositions are to be taken as if the testimony was being given in court, and they should therefore not engage in any conduct during the deposition that would not be allowed in the presence of a judicial officer. An attorney
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 34 of 200
Page 36¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
should avoid, through objections or otherwise, improper coaching of the deponent or suggesting answers.
(e) Requirement to meet and confer on discovery Attorneys should meet and confer on Discovery requests in a timely manner and make good faith attempts to actually resolve as many issues as can possibly be resolved before proceeding with motions concerning the discovery. Before filing a motion concerning discovery, or otherwise, an attorney should engage in more than a mere pro forma effort to resolve the issue(s). (Rule 2.121 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 2.122. Conduct Towards Other Attorneys, the Court and Participants (a) Professional conduct Attorneys must remember that conflicts with opposing counsel are professional and not personal, that vigorous advocacy is not inconsistent with professional courtesy, and that they should not be influenced by ill feelings or anger between clients in their conduct, attitude, or demeanor toward opposing attorneys. (b) Service of papers An attorney should never use the mode, timing or place of serving papers primarily to embarrass a party or witness. (c) Filing of motions Motions should be filed sparingly, in good faith and when the issue(s) cannot be otherwise resolved. An attorney should not engage in conduct which forces opposing counsel to file a motion and then not oppose the motion, or provide information called for in the motion only after the motion is filed. (d) Professional demeanor Attorneys should refrain from disparaging or denigrating the Court, opposing counsel, parties or witnesses before their clients, the public or the media. (e) Conduct of clients and witnesses Attorneys should be, and should impress upon their clients and witnesses the need to be, courteous and respectful and not rude or disruptive with the Court, court personnel, opposing counsel, parties and witnesses. (f) Instructions to attorneys on witnesses Attorneys should make an effort to explain to witnesses the purpose of their required attendance at depositions, hearing or trial. They should further attempt to accommodate the schedules of witnesses when setting or resetting their appearance, and promptly notify them of any cancellations. Dealings with nonparty witnesses should always be courteous
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 35 of 200
Page 37¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
and designed to leave them with an appropriately good impression of the legal system. Attorneys should instruct their clients and witnesses that they are not to communicate with the Court on the pending case except with all counsel or parties present in a reported proceeding.
(g) Notification to opposing party regarding ex parte Where applicable laws or rules permit an ex parte application or communication to the Court, before making such an application or communication, an attorney should make diligent efforts to notify opposing party or opposing counsel known to represent or likely to represent the opposing party, should make reasonable efforts to accommodate the schedule of such attorney or party to permit the opposing party to be represented, and should avoid taking advantage of an opponent’s known absence from the office. (h) Drafting court documents Attorneys should draft agreements and other documents promptly and so as to fairly reflect the true intent of the parties. (i) Prohibiting bias No attorney shall engage in any act of age, gender, sexual orientation, physical or mental impairment, religion, or race bias while engaging in the practice of law in Contra Costa County. (Rule 2.122 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 2.123. Candor to the Court and Opposing Counsel (a) Accuracy of written and oral statements Attorneys should not knowingly misstate, misrepresent or distort any fact or legal authority to the Court or to the opposing counsel, and shall not mislead by inaction or silence.
Written materials and oral argument to the Court should accurately state current law and fairly represent the party’s position without unfairly attacking the opposing counsel or opposing party.
(b) Manner to present new information If, after all briefing allowed by law or the Court has been submitted, an attorney locates new authority that s/he desires to bring to the Court’s attention at a hearing on the matter, a copy of such new authority shall be provided to both the Court and to all opposing counsel in the case at or before the hearing. (c) Proposed orders Attorneys should draft proposed orders promptly, and the orders should fairly and adequately represent the ruling of the Court. When proposed orders are submitted to counsel for approval, attorneys should promptly communicate any objections to the party
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 36 of 200
Page 38¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
preparing the proposed order so that good faith discussions can be had concerning the language of the proposed order.
(d) Court rulings Attorneys should respect and abide by the spirit and letter of all rulings of the Court. (e) Opposing letters to counsel An attorney should not draft letters assigning to an opposing party or opposing counsel a position that party or counsel has not taken or to create a “record” of events that have not occurred. (Rule 2.123 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 2.124. Efficient Administration (a) Avoid unnecessary action Attorneys should refrain from actions which cause unnecessary expense, or delay the efficient and cost-effective resolution of a dispute. (b) Stipulate to facts and legal authority Attorneys should, whenever appropriate, stipulate to all facts and legal authority not reasonably in dispute. (c) Encourage negotiation and resolution Attorneys should encourage principled negotiations and efficient resolution of disputes on their merits. (d) Punctuality and preparedness Attorneys should be punctual in communications with others, and punctual and prepared for all scheduled appearances. (e) Consider Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) In every case, and as soon as the case can be reasonably evaluated, an attorney should consider whether the client’s interest could be adequately served and the case more expeditiously and economically disposed of by settlement, arbitration, mediation or other form of alternative dispute resolution. (f) Make legitimate objections during deposition or trial An attorney in making objections during a deposition, trial or hearing should do so for legitimate and good faith reasons and should not make such objections only for the purpose of making a speech, harassment or delay. All remarks, argument, objections and requests by counsel during trial shall be addressed to the Court rather than directly to adversaries. Objections should be in legal form and without argument, unless directed to make argument by the Court.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 37 of 200
Page 39¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(g) Arrange witness appearance to eliminate delay An attorney shall arrange for the appearance of witnesses during presentation of their case so as to eliminate delay caused by waiting for witnesses who have been placed on call. APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION JUNE 1993. (Rule 2.124 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 2.150. Committee on Bias The Superior Court, in cooperation with the Contra County Bar Association, re-establishes a Committee on Bias, and adopts the procedures and stated purpose that are in these Local Rules of Court (see Title 10, Standard 10.20, Standards of Judicial Administration). (a) Informal complaint process defined The Judges of the Superior Court and the Contra Costa County Bar Association have agreed upon an informal complaint procedure addressing issues of age, gender, sexual orientation, disability, socioeconomic status, religion, national origin and race bias in the Courts (see Title 10, Standard 10.20, Standards of Judicial Administration). (b) Intent of procedure The intent of this procedure is not to discipline, but to educate with the purpose of improving the problem and preserving the integrity and impartiality of the judicial system. (c) Education The Committee on Bias shall sponsor or support educational programs designed to eliminate bias within the court and legal communities, including, but not limited to, bias based on disability, gender, race, religion, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. (d) Complaint procedure (1) Notify Committee on Bias. If a participant (participant includes, but is not limited to counsel, witnesses, parties or jurors) believes a bench officer has engaged in an act of bias or otherwise failed to ensure that proceedings are conducted in a manner that is fair and impartial to all participants, such person may send a written complaint to the Committee on bias either: 1) via letter addressed to the Committee on Bias, 2300 Clayton Rd., Suite 520, Concord, CA 94520; or 2) by email to bias@cccba.org.
i. Form of Complaint. Anonymous complaints will not be considered.
Complaints are limited to behavior or conduct occurring in courtroom proceedings. Complainants submitting non-conforming complaints shall be advised of the parameter of the complaints considered by the Committee as well as the confidentiality of the complainant’s identity.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 38 of 200
Page 40¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
ii. Disclosure of Identity of Complainant. The Committee shall keep the
identity of the complainant confidential and shall not disclose it to
individuals outside the Committee unless the conditions under subsection
(d)(5) of this rule have been met.
(2) Review of Committee on Bias. The Committee on Bias will hold a meeting to
review the complaint within 30 days of receipt of a written complaint. If the
complaint pertains to a judicial officer who is a member of the bias committee, that
judicial officer shall be disqualified from all proceedings involving the complaint.
The Committee’s focus will be on incidents that do not warrant discipline but that
should be corrected. The Committee’s responsibility is to evaluate and investigate
written complaints against judicial officer. The committee will strive to complete
the investigation within 90 days of receipt of a complaint. If additional time is
required, appropriate notice will be provided to all concerned with that complaint.
If the Committee substantiates a written complaint by determining it raises the
appearance of bias, the Committee will refer the matter to the Presiding Judge,
who will meet with the judicial officer who is the subject of the complaint and take
appropriate corrective action.
(3) Conduct of Committee on Bias. In determining whether a complaint raises an
appearance of bias, the Committee may conduct its own investigation which may
include contacting the complainant for additional information.
(4) Investigation of Committee on Bias. Any investigation conducted shall be
undertaken with the utmost care not to violate the confidentiality of the
complainant.
(5) Resolution of Complaint. It is hoped that making the bench officer aware of the
complaint will resolve the issue if one exists. If both the bench officer and the
complainant wish to confer about the matter, or try to further resolve any
outstanding problems, they may do so. However, this would be subject to the
agreement of both and to the complainant’s decision to waive any confidentiality.
(6) Allegation of Retaliation. Any allegation of retaliation against an individual making
a claim to the Committee will be taken seriously, and is subject to investigation by
the Committee under these provisions.
(7) Return of Complaint to Committee. After the Presiding Judge informs the Committee that the bench officer who is the source of the complaint has been contacted, the complaint will be returned to the Committee for destruction. However, for educational purposes, the Committee may maintain data as to the types of complaints received.
(8) No Referral to Commission on Judicial Performance. Matters referred to the
Committee will not be used as a basis for a referral by the Committee of a judicial
officer to the Commission on Judicial Performance.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 39 of 200
Page 41¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(9) Notification to Complainant. With respect to those incidents that, if substantiated,
would warrant discipline, the Committee will advise the complainant of the
appropriate disciplinary authority.
(e) Committee membership and length of service (1) Composition of Committee. The Committee on Bias is to be composed of representative members of the court community, including but not limited to, judges, lawyers, court administrators, representatives and individuals from minority, women’s and gay and lesbian bar associations, representatives from the County’s District Attorney and Public Defender offices, and from organizations that represent persons with disabilities.
(2) Number of Members on Committee. The total number of members on the
Committee shall not exceed 15. The Committee on Bias will consist of 5 members
appointed by the President of the Contra Costa County Bar Association. The
remaining members shall include: 1) at least one judge appointed by the Presiding
Judge; 2) one administration officer appointed by the Presiding Judge; and 3) up
to 8 representatives from Contra Costa legal organizations representing people of
color, the LGBTQ community, and the disabled, appointed by the Presiding Judge
or her/his designee. If a judge appointed to the committee is the subject of a
complaint, or a member of the Committee is a witness or the complainant in a
pending complaint, said judge or member shall be precluded from participating in
the review of that complaint.
(3) Term of Committee members. Committee members will serve for staggered terms.
A quorum will be necessary for meetings and a majority vote of those in attendance
will be required before any action can be taken.
(Rule 2.150, revised effective 7/1/21)
Chapter 9. Setting of Local Court Fees
Rule 2.160. Authorized Local Fees Pursuant to Government Code section 70631 and California Rule of Court 10.815, the Court charges the following local fees:
Court forms $0.50 per page
Packet of Court forms $1.25
Recording of court proceedings where applicable on a $25.00
media determined by the Court
Envelopes and postage $0.60
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 40 of 200
Page 42¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Non-professional supervised visitation training $25.00 – Parent
$10.00 – Supervisor
Child Custody Counseling Appointment No Show Fee $100.00
Postage and mailing of CDs $4.65
(Rule 2.160, revised effective 7/1/23)
Chapter 10. Communication of Concerns
Rule 2.170. Concerns (a) Judges and Subordinate Judicial Officers Concerns regarding judges and subordinate judicial officers must be submitted in writing, except where oral submissions may be permitted by Rule 10.703 of the California Rules of Court. Each concern will be considered carefully, and a written response will be issued. Written concerns must be signed, include an address where the court's response can be sent, and addressed to the Presiding Judge, P.O. Box 431, Martinez, CA 94553. Concerns about judges and subordinate judicial officers may not be submitted via email. (b) Court Employees and Services Concerns regarding court services or personnel, other than those related to a particular court case, must be submitted in writing. Each concern will be considered carefully, and a written response will be issued. Written concerns must be signed, include an address where the court's response can be sent, and addressed to the Court Executive Officer at:
Email: mediainfo@contracosta.courts.ca.gov Or Mail: P.O. Box 431, Martinez, CA 94553
(Rule 2.170 amended 1/1/22)
Chapter 11. Remote Appearances
Rule 2.180. Remote Appearances
(a) This Local Rule is adopted pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. Requirements for notice are set forth in Rule 3.672 and below. The subsection concerning remote hearings in domestic violence and gun violence restraining order matters is adopted pursuant to Family Code §6308(b) and Penal Code § 18123(b). Where they conflict, these rules supersede other previously-enacted rules, emergency rules, or directives concerning remote appearances. This rule does not apply to remote appearances covered by Code of Civil Procedure section 367.76.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 41 of 200
Page 43¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(b) General Provisions Regarding Remote Appearances
(1) The Court has uses Zoom (audio and video) as its sole remote appearance
platform.
(2) Remote appearances in contested hearings, excluding those described in
subsection (c), shall be by video. Audio-only appearances shall not be permitted
for such hearings unless specifically permitted by the judicial officer.
(3) A remote hearing is subject to all laws governing confidentiality, photographing
and recordings of proceedings in a courtroom. No one appearing remotely may
record, photograph or reproduce any hearing, or any part of a hearing, including
any screenshots. Any person who violates this provision shall be subject to all
sanctions provided under the law for a like action in an in-person hearing.
(4) A judicial officer may order that a specific hearing be conducted by remote
appearance. If that hearing is an evidentiary hearing or trial, parties objecting to
the remote hearing shall file their objection as provided in Rule 3.672(h).
(5) In any hearing not specifically set by the court to be conducted by remote
appearance, a party who has failed to provide a notice of remote appearance
may appear remotely upon a judicial officer’s finding under Rule 3.672(j)(2) of
good cause, unforeseen circumstances, or that the remote appearance would
promote access to justice.
(6) A judicial officer may elect to terminate a remote hearing and continue the matter
to a later in-person appearance should the judicial officer find that any of the
criteria of Code of Civil Procedure section 367.75(b) and/or Rule of Court
3.672(d) are met.
(c) Civil Case Management, Law & Motion, and Ex Parte Hearings; Short-Cause Family Matters
(1) Parties in civil case management, civil law and motion, civil ex parte (not
including domestic violence restraining orders), and short-cause family law
matters may stipulate either orally or in writing to waive notice of other parties’
remote appearance.
(2) The Court waives notice of parties appearing remotely for these matters. Parties
do not need to file a Notice of Remote Appearance, but must serve the notice as
set forth in Rule 3.672 unless the parties have stipulated to waive notice.
(d) Civil Evidentiary Hearings, Settlement Conferences, and Trials
(1) For evidentiary hearings, settlement conferences, and bench or jury trials, parties
must appear in person unless the Court has granted prior express written
authorization for a remote appearance.
(2) The time frames and procedures for remote appearance requests and oppositions are set forth in Rule 3.672(h).
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 42 of 200
Page 44¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(3) Courtesy copies of any requests or oppositions shall be filed with the department.
(4) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to require personal appearance of an
expert witness unless the judicial officer has previously found good cause for the
expert witness to appear in person.
(e) Probate Matters
(1) For probate hearings other than evidentiary hearings, settlement conferences,
and trials, parties may stipulate either orally or in writing to waive notice of other
parties’ remote appearance.
(2) The Court waives notice of parties appearing remotely for these matters. Parties
do not need to file a Notice of Remote Appearance, but must serve the notice as
set forth in Rule 3.672 unless the parties have stipulated to waive notice.
(3) For evidentiary hearings, settlement conferences, and trials, the provisions of
subsection (d) shall apply.
(f) Juvenile Dependency Matters.
(1) The provisions of Rule 3.672(i) shall apply to Juvenile Dependency matters.
(2) All confidentiality requirements applicable to in-person Juvenile Dependency
proceedings shall apply equally to remote hearings. In the event the Court
cannot ensure that a remote appearance will have the privacy and security
necessary to preserve the confidentiality of the proceeding, the judicial officer
may order any person to appear in-person, and may elect to terminate a remote
hearing and continue the matter for a later in-person appearance.
(g) Special Rules for Domestic Violence and Gun Violence Restraining Orders
(1) Instructions for remote appearances in domestic violence and gun violence
restraining order hearings will be posted to the Court’s restraining order
webpage: https://www.cc-courts.org/restraining-orders/restraining-orders.aspx.
(2) The Court designates the departmental phone number for the department
hearing each respective order as the phone number for the public to call to obtain
assistance regarding a remote appearance. The designated departmental phone
numbers will be posted on the restraining order webpage above. These phone
numbers will be staffed from 30 minutes prior to the start of the court session at
which the hearing will take place and during that court session.
(Rule 2.180 revised effective 1/1/25)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 43 of 200
Page 45¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Title Three. Civil Rules
Chapter 1. Administration of Civil Litigation
Rule 3.1. Applicability Unless otherwise specified, this rule applies to all civil cases except Juvenile, Probate and Family Law cases, extraordinary writs, Asset Forfeiture cases under Health and Safety Code Section 11470 et seq., and Limited Jurisdiction Collections Cases under provisions of California Rules of Court, Rule 3.740. Special provisions are made for expediting Unlawful Detainer cases (see Rule 3.12). (Rule 3.1 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 3.2. Definitions as Used in Title Three As used in Title 3:
(1) The term "counsel” includes parties representing themselves.
(2) The term "plaintiff" also includes cross-complainant.
(3) The term "defendant" also includes cross-defendant.
(Rule 3.2 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 3.3. Transferred Cases Unless excluded under Rule 3.8(c), all cases transferred from another jurisdiction are subject to this Rule. (Rule 3.3 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 3.4. Policy (a) Civil case management It is the policy of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County to track and manage all cases from the moment the complaint is filed until disposition and to conclude all civil cases as expeditiously as possible within the limits of available funding and staffing. (Rule 3.4(a) revised effective 1/1/13) (b) Disposition goals (1) It is the goal of the Court to conclude 75% of all Unlimited Jurisdiction Civil cases and 90% of Limited Jurisdiction Civil cases filed within 12 months of the filing of the complaint, 85% of all Unlimited Jurisdiction Civil cases and 98% of all Limited Jurisdiction Civil cases filed within 18 months of the filing of the complaint, and 100% of all civil litigation cases within 24 months of the filing of the complaint.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 44 of 200
Page 46¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(Rule 3.4(b)(1) revised effective 1/1/13)
(2) It is the policy of the Court that all civil cases, not court-designated as “complex,”
are presumed to be appropriate for a disposition goal of 12 months. The Court
may modify this disposition goal at any time upon the showing of good cause or
insufficient staffing due to lack of funding.
(Rule 3.4(b)(2) revised effective 1/1/13)
(c) Hearings It is the policy of the Court that unnecessary hearings, which tend to delay the progress of litigation, be avoided. The Court urges counsel to meet and confer on disputed issues before motions are filed. (Rule 3.4(c) revised effective 1/1/01) (d) Assignment of Unlimited Jurisdiction Civil cases All Unlimited Jurisdiction Civil cases subject to this rule will be assigned to one judge for all purposes unless otherwise determined by the Presiding Judge for good cause. (Rule 3.4(d) revised effective 1/1/13) (e) Uninsured motorists The following policy applies to uninsured motorist cases:
(1) Promptly upon learning that an action is to proceed as an uninsured motorist case,
plaintiff's counsel shall file a declaration setting forth the information upon which
such a determination has been made. The declaration shall include: A statement
that coverage exists under an uninsured motorist's insurance policy; the name of
the carrier and limits of coverage. It shall also include a statement that counsel
believes that the limits of coverage are adequate to compensate for known loss or
damage; that plaintiff(s) will promptly pursue such remedy and that it is counsel's
present intention to assign the claim or dismiss the pending action upon receipt of
a recovery by settlement or award.
(2) The declaration shall be captioned "Request for Temporary Exemption - Uninsured
Motorist Case."
(3) Upon review of the declaration, the Court may designate the action as an uninsured motorist case in which event the time requirements under this Rule will be suspended for up to 270 days from the date the complaint was filed or from such other date the Court, in its discretion, shall fix. The case will be monitored by the setting of a review hearing at the end of the suspension period. If a dismissal has not been filed, plaintiff's counsel must file a further declaration five (5) court days before the review hearing date and provide a status report and, if necessary, a request with supporting justification for additional time to conclude the case. (Rule 3.4(e) revised effective 1/1/16)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 45 of 200
Page 47¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(f) Dismissal of “DOES” upon disposition It is the policy of the Court that each case be completely disposed. At the time of adjudication of the case, by request for dismissal or request for entry of judgment, all remaining parties including DOES, will be dismissed by the Court unless otherwise specified. (Rule 3.4(f) revised effective 1/1/16) (g) Exception order Nothing in this Rule shall be interpreted to prevent the Court in an individual case from issuing an Exception Order based on a specific finding that the interest of justice requires a modification of the routine procedures as prescribed by this Local Court Rule. (Rule 3.4(g) revised effective 1/1/13) (h) Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) It is the policy of the Court to encourage the parties in all cases to consider the use of appropriate alternative dispute resolution options as a means of resolving their disputes without trial. The Court encourages parties who can agree to use ADR before the first Case Management Conference to use the appropriate local court form:
(1) CV-655b – ADR Case Management Stipulation and Order (Unlimited Jurisdiction
Civil Cases)
(2) CV-659d – ADR Case Management Stipulation (Limited Jurisdiction Civil Cases)
(Rule 3.4(h) revised effective 1/1/13)
(i) Notice to court upon disposition It is the policy of the Court that proper notice be given to the Court of the disposition of cases. (Refer to Rule 3.100 for settlements) (Rule 3.4(i) revised effective 1/1/13) (Rule 3.4 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 3.5. Venue, Filing and Form of Papers (a) Unlimited and Limited Jurisdiction Civil cases: All new Unlimited and Limited Jurisdiction Civil cases (excluding Limited Jurisdiction Unlawful Detainer and Small Claims cases), and any subsequent papers shall be filed in Martinez (see California Rules of Court, Rule 2.100 for form of papers). (Rule 3.5(a) revised effective 1/1/16) (b) Limited Jurisdiction Civil cases filed before January 1, 2006: (1) All Limited Jurisdiction Civil cases filed before January 1, 2006, in Richmond or Pittsburg Branch Courts shall remain in the branch court where the complaint was filed and any subsequent papers filed in such matters shall only be filed in the originating branch court.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 46 of 200
Page 48¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(2) All Limited Jurisdiction Civil cases filed before January 1, 2006 in Concord or
Walnut Creek are transferred to Martinez effective January 1, 2013, and any
subsequent papers filed in such matters shall only be filed in Martinez. All hearings
that are scheduled to occur in Limited Jurisdiction cases after January 1, 2006, will
be held in Martinez.
(Rule 3.5(b) revised effective 1/1/16)
(c) Limited Jurisdiction Unlawful Detainer cases (1) All Limited Jurisdiction Unlawful Detainer cases, and all subsequent filings in these cases, must be filed in the appropriate court location based upon the location of the property in question with the exception of those that currently fall under the jurisdiction of the Concord/Mt. Diablo and Walnut Creek branch courts.
(2) Effective January 1, 2013, Limited Jurisdiction Unlawful Detainer cases where the
property is located in the following cities and adjacent unincorporated areas must
be filed in the Martinez Clerk’s Office at 725 Court Street, Martinez, CA:
Avon, Alamo, Blackhawk, Camino Tassajara, Canyon, Clayton, Clyde, Concord,
Danville, Lafayette, Martinez, Moraga, Orinda, Pacheco, Pleasant Hill, Rheem,
Rossmoor, San Ramon, St. Mary’s College, Walnut Creek, Ygnacio Valley and
adjacent unincorporated areas.
(Rule 3.5(c)(2) revised effective 1/1/13)
(d) Small Claims cases (1) All Small Claims cases must be filed in one of the following locations. All subsequent filings must be filed in that same location.
(A) The locality where one or more of the defendants resides; or
(B) If the action arises from operation of a business by one or more defendants,
the location where such a defendant has his, her, or its principal place of
business; or
(C) The locality where a substantial part of the events in question occurred; or
(D) If there is no appropriate locality under any of the preceding provisions, in
any locality.
(2) The geographic territory for filing in the appropriate court location effective January 1, 2013 is as follows (A) Martinez: Avon, Alamo, Blackhawk, Camino Tassajara, Canyon, Clayton, Clyde, Concord, Danville, Lafayette, Martinez, Moraga, Orinda, Pacheco, Pleasant Hill, Rheem, Rossmoor, San Ramon, St. Mary’s College, Walnut Creek, Ygnacio Valley and adjacent unincorporated areas. (B) Pittsburg: Antioch, Bay Point, Bethel Island, Brentwood, Byron, Discovery Bay, Knightsen, Oakley, Pittsburg and adjacent unincorporated areas.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 47 of 200
Page 49¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(C) Richmond: Crockett, El Cerrito, El Sobrante, Hercules, Kensington, North
Richmond, Pinole, Point Richmond, Port Costa, Richmond, Rodeo,
Rollingwood, San Pablo, Tilden Park North and adjacent unincorporated
areas.
(Rule 3.5(d)(2) revised effective 1/1/13)
(Rule 3.5 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 3.6. Challenge to Assigned Judge In both Unlimited and Limited Jurisdiction Civil cases (which are assigned to one judge for all purposes), a challenge to the assigned judge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 170.6 must be made in accordance with the time requirements set forth in that section. Upon acceptance of a proper challenge under Code of Civil Procedure Section 170.6, the case will be reassigned. (Rule 3.6 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 3.7. Service of Summons, Complaint, Cross-Complaint, Responsive Pleadings and Default Judgments (1) Counsel are to be familiar with and follow with particularity the rules set forth in California Rules of Court, Rule 3.110 as to service and filing of pleadings and proofs of service and the notice of default judgments.
(2) Upon failure to serve the complaint and file a proof of service as required, an Order to Show Cause shall issue as to why counsel shall not be sanctioned for failure to comply with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.110.
(3) Responsive papers to the Order to Show Cause must be filed and served no less than five (5) court days in advance of the hearing.
(4) For purposes of Code of Civil Procedure section 415.20(b), a party shows reasonable diligence in attempting personal service by attempting personal delivery in good faith on at least three occasions. The party's attempts at personal service must occur on at least two different days of the week, and if service is at a dwelling, at least one attempt must occur on a Saturday or Sunday. If a party meets these requirements, a court clerk will find that the reasonable diligence requirement is met. (Rule 3.7 revised effective 1/1/19)
Rule 3.8. Case Management Conference Procedure (Formerly Referred to as Status Conference) (a) Filing of complaint Upon filing a complaint, which includes a completed Civil Case Cover Sheet (Judicial Council Form CM-010), the plaintiff will receive the following from the Clerk or Court support staff:
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 48 of 200
Page 50¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(1) Summons and Complaint and notification of the assigned department for Superior
Court cases;
(2) Notice and date of the First Case Management Conference (This court-generated
notice includes the assigned date, time, and department);
(3) Notice to Defendants (Local Court Form CV-655(d) for Unlimited Civil Jurisdiction
cases and Form CV-659(b) for Limited Jurisdiction Civil cases);
(4) A blank Case Management Statement (Judicial Council Form CM-110) and an
Alternative Dispute Resolution Information Sheet (Local Court Form CV-655(c) for
Unlimited Civil Jurisdiction cases and Form CV-659(e) for Limited Jurisdiction Civil
cases);
(5) In Limited Jurisdiction Civil cases only, the Case Questionnaire for Limited Civil
Cases (Judicial Council Form DISC-010) and a blank Issue Conference Statement
(Local Court Form CV-659(c));
(6) Plaintiffs in unlimited civil jurisdiction cases will also receive an ADR Case
Management Stipulation and Order (Local Court Form CV-655(b) for Unlimited
Jurisdiction Civil cases and plaintiffs in Limited Jurisdiction Civil cases will receive
an ADR Case Management Stipulation (Local Court Form CV-659(d)).
(Rule 3.8(a) revised effective 1/1/17)
(b) Case questionnaire for Limited Jurisdiction Civil cases Any cross-complainant naming any new party in a limited jurisdiction civil case will also be served with a blank Case Questionnaire for Limited Civil Cases (Judicial Council Form DISC-010). (c) Setting the Case Management Conference for transfer-ins If a case is transferred from another jurisdiction after a responsive pleading has been filed, the First Case Management Conference will be set within forty-five (45) calendar days from the Order of Transfer. If no responsive pleading has been filed, the First Case Management Conference will be set within ninety (90) calendar days from the Order of Transfer. In all other particulars, the plaintiff in a transfer case will receive the same information and items as described above. (d) Notice of first CMC At the time of serving the Summons and Complaint (and a cross-complaint upon a new party), the responding party shall be served with the Notice of the First Case Management Conference and an ADR Case Management Stipulation and Order (Local Court Form CV- 655(b)) for unlimited jurisdiction civil cases, and the ADR Case Management Stipulation. The responding party in unlimited jurisdiction civil cases and plaintiffs in limited jurisdiction civil cases will receive an ADR Case Management Stipulation (Local Court Form CV - 659(d)) for Limited Jurisdiction Civil cases. The responding party in limited jurisdiction civil
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 49 of 200
Page 51¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
cases will also receive a blank Case Questionnaire for Limited Civil Cases (Judicial Council form DISC-010).
(e) File and serve Case Management Statement Each appearing party shall file and serve the completed Case Management Statement, (Judicial Council Form CM-110), at least fifteen (15) calendar days before the First Case Management Conference as provided by California Rules of Court, Rule 3.725. Rule 3.8(e) revised effective 7/1/02) (f) Request for early Case Management Conference One or more parties to a civil action may request that the assigned department advance the date of the first case management conference in the action, subject to the following: (Rule 3.8(f) revised effective 1/1/09)
(1) Requests must be in writing, but may be informal, such as in letter format. They
should be lodged (rather than filed) with the department assigned the matter.
(2) Such requests must be served upon all parties that have appeared in the action.
(3) The request shall either recite that all parties join in the request or, if not, must
provide a brief but clear explanation of the benefits of advancing the conference
date.
(4) Any party opposing a request shall lodge and serve an informal statement of
opposition, with reasons, within five (5) calendar days of receiving the request.
(5) The Court reserves the discretion to determine whether such an early conference
would be beneficial and whether the department’s calendar can accommodate the
request.
(g) First Case Management Conference The First Case Management Conference shall be conducted in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.721. Counsel are required to be thoroughly familiar with and abide by that Rule. (Rule 3.8(g) revised effective 7/1/02) (h) Subsequent Case Management Conference Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, a party need not file a Case Management Statement (Judicial Council Form CM-110) for subsequent conferences unless that party has not previously filed that form. Parties are welcome to file narrative status conference statements with proper material that they believe would be helpful to the Court. (Rule 3.8(h) revised effective 9/1/04) (Rule 3.8 revised effective 1/1/17)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 50 of 200
Page 52¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 3.9. Telephone Appearances The Unlimited Jurisdiction Civil Departments (fast track departments) generally use Zoom for remote appearances, whether video and audio or audio only. The Court reserves the right in any matter to require a personal appearance as permitted by law. (Rule 3.9 revised effective 7/1/23)
Rule 3.10. Sanctions If the Court finds that any party has not proceeded with due diligence or has otherwise failed to comply with this Rule, sanctions may be imposed. (Rule 3.10 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 3.11. Issue Conference (a) Time and purpose of Issue Conference Within fourteen (14) calendar days before the trial date, unless otherwise ordered, an Issue Conference will be held during which all matters necessary to be resolved before trial will be before the Court. All trial counsel must be present, along with all principals or clients and claims representatives with settlement authority. (Rule 3.11(a) revised effective 1/1/16) (b) Motions in limine All motions in limine must be in writing and are to be filed and served at least ten (10) calendar days before the conference. Motions in limine should be numbered consecutively and if a party files more than five (5) motions, an index must be provided. Any objections to motions in limine must be filed and served five (5) calendar days before the conference, with a copy lodged with the chambers of the department to which the case is assigned. Parties should not submit motions in limine upon the following topics as each fast track trial department will issue orders sua sponte as follows: (Rule 3.11(b) revised effective 1/1/16)
(1) No witness may be called, except with Court permission in exceptional
circumstances, unless notice has been given to all parties of the date when the
witness will testify. Such notice shall be given no later than at the end of the court
day preceding the court day when the witness is to testify.
(2) All witnesses will be excluded from the courtroom, unless otherwise ordered,
excepting those for whom an exception exists at law (e.g., parties and corporate
representatives).
(3) Evidence of, or reference to, settlement negotiations, mediation, and materials
which are privileged under the evidence code or by agreement of the parties shall
not be allowed.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 51 of 200
Page 53¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(Rule 3.11(b)(3) revised effective 1/1/16)
(4) Evidence of, or reference to, insurance, or the fact that an attorney is employed
by, or has been compensated by, an insurance company, shall not be allowed.
(5) Evidence of, or reference to, other claims or actions against any party to the
litigation shall not be allowed without permission from the Court.
(6) Evidence of, or reference to, the financial position or wealth, or lack thereof, of any
party to the litigation, shall not be allowed without permission from the Court.
(Rule 3.11(b)(6) revised effective 9/1/04)
(c) Issue Conference Statement Parties must file with the court and serve all parties an Issue Conference Statement (Local Court Form CV-659(c)) of not more than ten (10) pages at least five (5) court days before the Issue Conference. In limited civil cases only, use of the local Issue Conference Statement form (Local Court Form CV-659(c)) is mandatory. The following shall be included in the Issue Conference Statement and will be considered at the Issue Conference:
(1) A statement of the facts, law and respective contentions of the parties regarding
liability, damages (with specific dollar details), nature and extent of injuries, any
unusual evidentiary or legal issues anticipated at trial, and all matters of fact
believed by any party to be appropriate for stipulation;
(2) A witness list, including only those witnesses that each party actually expects to
have testify, with a brief statement of anticipated testimony, and exhibit list;
(3) A trial length estimate and a proposed statement of the case to be read to the jury,
and proposed voir dire questions; and
(4) A list (index) of proposed CACI jury instructions, as required by California Rules of
Court, 2.1055, and copies of any proposed special instructions [note: copies of
CACI instructions should not be submitted with the Issue Conference Statement.
(Rule 3.11(c) revised effective 1/1/17)
(d) Settlement statement Each party shall lodge with the assigned department, at the time of filing of the Issue Conference Statement, a settlement statement in the form and content described in Local Rule 3.101. (Rule 3.11(d) revised effective 1/1/08) (e) Jury questionnaires (1) If any party intends to request that a specific written questionnaire be submitted to the jury, said party shall, no later than twenty (20) court days before the Issue Conference, serve a proposed questionnaire on the other parties;
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 52 of 200
Page 54¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(2) Any party objecting to any question or proposing additional questions, shall serve
said objections or proposals on all other parties no later than fifteen (15) court days
before the Issue Conference;
(3) All parties shall meet and confer to attempt resolution of objections and proposals
no later than ten (10) court days before the Issue Conference;
(4) The questionnaire shall be submitted with the Issue Conference Statement with
any unresolved questions requiring a ruling by the Court clearly identified;
(5) If the Court approves a questionnaire, it shall be the responsibility of the party
submitting a questionnaire to have an adequate number of copies delivered to the
office of the Jury Commissioner no later than two (2) court days before the
scheduled commencement of trial, and to arrange and pay for prompt copying and
distribution of the completed questionnaire to the Court and other parties in the
order in which jurors will be called; and
(6) Failure to comply with the requirements of Local Rule 3.11(e)(4) and (5) may result
in an order that the case be tried without the use of a written questionnaire.
(Rule 3.11(e) revised effective 1/1/16)
(Rule 3.11 revised effective 1/1/17)
Rule 3.12. Jury Fees Jury fees shall be deposited and may be refunded as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Sections 631 and 631.3. A nonrefundable jury fee of $150.00 is due on or before the date scheduled for the initial case management conference in the action or at such other time as permitted by statute. No refund of the jury fees deposited shall be made unless the party making the deposit has given the Jury Commissioner written notice of settlement, of the granting of a motion for continuance, or of the waiving of a jury, at least two (2) court days before the date set for trial, or by Order of Court. (Rule 3.12 new effective 1/1/18)
Rule 3.13. Reporting of Court Proceedings in Civil Fast Track Departments (1) Except as otherwise provided by Local Rule 2.53, official court reporters employed by the court are unavailable in the Unlimited/Limited Civil Fast Track Departments effective January 1, 2013 until further notice. Consult the Notice of Availability on the court’s website for current status and any changes. (Rule 3.13(1) revised effective 1/1/19)
(2) Except as otherwise provided by Local Rule 2.53, any party who desires a verbatim record of the proceedings from which a transcript can later be prepared, may procure the services of an outside private certified court reporter pro tempore to report any scheduled hearing or trial (see Government Code section 70044 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956). (Rule 3.13(2) revised effective 1/1/19)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 53 of 200
Page 55¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(3) Parties electing to procure the services of an outside reporter must comply with Local Rule 2.52. (Rule 3.13(3) revised effective 1/1/19)
(4) Pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956(d), if a party arranges and pays for the attendance of a certified shorthand reporter at a hearing in a civil case because of the unavailability of the services of an official court reporter, none of the parties will be charged the reporter’s attendance fee provided for in Government Code Sections 68086(a)(1)(A) or (B).
(5) If court reporters become available and in the court’s discretion are provided by the court for any civil hearings, or if a court reporter is provided pursuant to Local Rule 2.53, any party who has not been granted a fee waiver under Government Code section 68631 et seq. will be required to pay the applicable reporter attendance fee provided for in Government Code sections 68086(a)(1)(A) or (B). (Rule 3.13(5) revised effective 1/1/19)
(6) Parties shall be responsible for all transcript costs pursuant to Government Code Section 69953. (Rule 3.13(6) revised effective 1/1/13)
(7) For all proceedings less than thirty minutes in length, the Appellate Division elects to authorize the use of an official electronic recording, where available, as the record of the oral proceeding instead of obtaining a corrected statement on appeal from the judicial officer who presided over the proceeding before the Appellate Division, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 8.835(c). (Rule 3.13(7) new effective 1/1/19) (Rule 3.13 revised effective 1/1/19)
Rule 3.14. Unlawful Detainer Trial Setting (1) Within forty-five (45) calendar days from the filing of the complaint, unlawful detainer cases entitled to expedited handling shall be either adjudicated, or a memo to set trial or conditional settlement shall have been filed. This time limit may be stayed or extended by a judicial officer or commissioner for good cause shown.
(2) If an unlawful detainer case entitled to expedited handling has not been adjudicated, or had a memo to set trial or conditional settlement filed within the 45-day period (or such extended time as may be set by a judicial officer or commissioner), an order to show cause re: sanctions or dismissal directed to the plaintiff shall issue.
(3) In the event an order to show cause re: sanctions or dismissal is issued, any responsive papers to such order to show cause must be filed at least five (5) court days before the hearing date on the order to show cause.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 54 of 200
Page 56¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(4) When an unlawful detainer case is ready for trial, the plaintiff shall file a memo to set the case for trial, and shall use Judicial Council Form UD-150 for this purpose.
(5) If the procedures set forth in this rule result in setting a trial date that is less than ten (10) court days after an answer is filed, the answering party may request a continuance of the trial date, and such a request may be granted.
(Rule 3.14 revised effective 1/1/20)
Rule 3.15. Relief Following Breach of a Settlement Agreement in Limited Jurisdiction Cases (a) Unlawful Detainer cases A settlement agreement may provide that, in the event of default, the non-defaulting party may seek additional relief from the Court by filing an ex parte application. If it does, then:
(1) An ex parte application filed pursuant to this provision must comply with California
Rules of Court, Rules 3.1201 through 3.1207, unless otherwise stipulated by the
parties.
(2) Such an application, except in emergency situations, will be heard in each
department at times designated by the assigned judge or commissioner.
(3) If a settlement agreement does not contain a provision as described in paragraph
(a), then the non-defaulting party seeking additional relief must file a motion to
obtain that relief. Applications for Orders Shortening Time will be viewed with
presumptive favor in unlawful detainer cases seeking possession and other cases
in which time is of the essence.
(b) Non-Unlawful Detainer cases (1) A settlement agreement may provide that, in the event of default, the non- defaulting party may seek additional relief from the Court. However, the non- defaulting party will not be granted additional relief without notice to the defaulting party.
(2) The proper form for seeking additional relief is a noticed motion. The parties may
agree, in advance, to an Order Shortening Time for the hearing of such a motion,
provided that (except in exceptional cases, for good cause shown) the time for
noticing the motion shall not be less than ten (10) court days.
(3) If the settlement agreement does not provide for shortened time, as described in
paragraph (b)(2), then a party may file an ex parte application to have the motion
heard on shortened time. Any such application must comply with the California
Rules of Court, Rule 3.1200 .
(4) If, at the time of the default, the defaulting party stipulates in writing to further relief,
the Court will entertain an application for entry of an order upon stipulation without
need for formal motion. Nothing in this rule shall preclude a party from seeking to
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 55 of 200
Page 57¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
enforce the terms of a settlement agreement (as opposed to seeking additional relief for breach) by an appropriate motion pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6 or other controlling authority. (Rule 3.15(b)(4) revised effective 1/1/05)
(Rule 3.15 renumbered effective 1/1/18)
Rule 3.16. Complex Litigation Cases (1) There shall be designated a Complex Civil Litigation Department to which cases covered by California Rules of Court, Rule 3.400 shall be assigned, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.
(2) Counsel for plaintiffs shall use the most current form of civil cover sheet to indicate whether a matter is or is not deemed complex. Other parties may counter-designate at or before the time for the filing of a first appearance (see California Rules of Court, Rule 3.402). (Rule 3.16(2) revised effective 1/1/16)
(3) Complex cases are subject to the procedures outlined on the Court’s website concerning Complex Litigation as well as the Court’s Electronic Case Filing Standing Order. See http://www.cc-courts.org/civil/complex-litigation.aspx. (Rule 3.16(3) new effective 7/1/20)
(4) In making any determination whether a case is complex or noncomplex under California Rules of Court, Rule 3.402 or Rule 3.403, the Department making the determination may consider any other related or other case pending in this court that it may think relevant to the designation as complex or noncomplex. Whether or not any such case is deemed complex, the Department may also make any other orders that it deems conducive to effective administration and determination of any or all such cases, such as consolidating some or all of them, transferring some or all of them to a common Department, or deeming some or all of them related.
(Rule 3.16(4) new effective 1/1/25)
(5) If any hearing concerning whether a case is complex or noncomplex is held pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.402 or Rule 3.403, notice of such hearing shall also be given in any other such cases under consideration under Rule 3.16(4), and the attorneys or parties in such cases may participate therein.
(Rule 3.16(5) new effective 1/1/25)
(6) The determination (with or without hearing) as to whether a case is complex or noncomplex will be made by the Complex Civil Litigation Department. If any such case is assigned for all purposes to a different Department, the Complex Civil Department’s decision of such determination shall not constitute assignment of the case to that Department for all purposes. However, if the court determines that the case is complex,
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 56 of 200
Page 58¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
the case should forthwith be transferred for all purposes to the Complex Civil Litigation Department.
(Rule 3.16(6) new effective 1/1/25)
(7) In the event that the Judge assigned as the Complex Civil Litigation Department is disqualified from hearing a case for purposes of the determination called for in Rule 3.16(6), that determination shall be made by the Department to which the case is assigned for all purposes, as though no Complex Civil Department existed.
(Rule 3.16(7) new effective 1/1/25)
(Rule 3.16 revised effective 1/1/25)
Rule 3.17. CEQA Claims The title of any pleading seeking relief under the California Environmental Quality Act, whether by petition or complaint, shall clearly identify that the matter is a CEQA action [e.g., “CEQA claim: Complaint for Damages”]. (Rule 3.17 renumbered effective 1/1/18)
Rule 3.18. Conforming Copies The Superior Court Clerk will conform a maximum of two copies of any document at the time of filing. Additional copies will be provided by photocopying and the standard Superior Court Clerk fee for copies will be charged. (Rule 3.18 renumbered effective 1/1/18)
Rule 3.19. Unlawful Detainer Process
Unlawful Detainer cases are heard by qualified court commissioners. In the event a party chooses not to stipulate to the hearing of an unlawful detainer matter by a commissioner, the hearing shall be referred to the Supervising Judge of the division in which the matter is pending (Pittsburg, Richmond, or Martinez).
The Supervising Judge may hear the matter or refer it to any other judge of this court. This does not affect the court’s authority, under Code of Civil Procedure section 259(b), to direct a commissioner to take proof and report findings therein as to any matter of fact upon which information is required by the court, where properly specified pursuant to section 259(b).
(Rule 3.19, revised 1/1/24)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 57 of 200
Page 59¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Chapter 2. Civil Law and Motion
Rule 3.40. Law and Motion Calendar There shall be a Civil Litigation Division (which includes a Discovery Commissioner when available funding permits) which will handle civil law and motion matters:
(1) Each judge in the Civil Litigation Division shall designate one day of the week for his or her Law and Motion matters.
(2) Each judge in the Civil Litigation Division shall designate the day(s) of the week and time(s) that discovery matters and ex parte applications will be heard in their department.
(3) Exceptions
a. All law and motion matters relating to Family Law shall be heard in the Family Law Departments.
b. Motions in Unlawful Detainer cases shall be heard in the appropriate court or department scheduled.
c. As provided in Local Rule 7.1, most law and motion regarding probate matters shall be heard in the Probate Department.
(Rule 3.40 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 3.41. Hearing Dates With the exception of motions brought pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128.7, all other motion hearing dates will be assigned by the Clerk’s Office at the time the motion is filed unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Dates cannot be reserved or given over the telephone. (Rule 3.41 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 3.42. Papers to Comply with State Rules (1) Moving, opposing and reply papers must be filed and served with the Court and parties within the time prescribed by law. The Court will not consider late filed papers unless good cause is shown at the hearing.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 58 of 200
Page 60¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(2) All memoranda and other papers filed in support of, and in opposition to, motions shall comply with the requirements of the California Rules of Court.
(3) Despite Rule 3.1110 of the California Rules of Court, subdivision (f), a large number of documents filed with the Court include exhibits that are not properly tabbed or ,where electronically filed, are not properly bookmarked. The purpose of this rule is to discourage such rule violations, which impose a substantial burden on judges and staff.
(A) If a particular attorney service repeatedly files documents lacking proper tabs or
bookmarks where required, the matter will be referred to the Presiding Judge for
appropriate action.
(B) Counsel of record should take note the Court has and will continue to impose
monetary sanctions on attorneys who file documents lacking proper tabs or
bookmarks where required, regardless of whether such documents were fax-filed
through an attorney service, and in some instances will disregard those documents
or drop a hearing from calendar based on the rule violation.
(Rule 3.42 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 3.43. Tentative Ruling (1) The Civil Litigation Division shall operate a tentative ruling system for Unlimited Civil law and motion. The tentative rulings can be obtained beginning at 1:30 p.m. the court day preceding the hearing. Phone numbers and tentative rulings for Martinez are available on the court website www.cc-courts.org. If the website is down, or for some reason cannot be accessed by the litigant or counsel, the number to call, during business hours is (925) 608-1000. Tentative rulings will be posted on the Court’s website for a minimum of 120 days, after which they may be removed. (Rule 3.43(1) revised effective 1/1/22)
(2) The tentative ruling will become the Court's ruling unless by 4:00 p.m. of the court day preceding the hearing, counsel or self-represented parties call the department rendering the decision to request argument. If a judge so indicates in the instructions accompanying the tentative ruling, the parties may also be required to specify what issues are to be argued.
Calling counsel or self-represented parties requesting argument must advise all other affected counsel and self-represented parties by no later than 4:00 p.m. of his or her decision to appear and of the issues to be argued. Failure to timely advise the Court and counsel or self-represented parties will preclude any party from arguing the matter. (Rule 3.43(2) revised effective 7/1/23)
(3) The prevailing party must prepare an order after hearing in accordance with the requirements of California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. (Rule 3.43(3) revised effective 1/1/01) (Rule 3.43 revised effective 7/1/23)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 59 of 200
Page 61¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 3.44. Remote Appearances for Law and Motion If the judge hearing a matter determines on an individual case that a personal appearance is necessary (i.e. that a remote appearance will not be allowed), the tentative ruling will so indicate unless the Court has previously been advised. (Rule 3.44 revised effective 7/1/23)
Rule 3.45. Reporting of Law and Motion Law and motion oral arguments are not reported in Civil Fast Track Departments until further notice, except as provided by Local Rule 2.53. Otherwise, parties may procure the services of an outside reporter as set forth in Local Rule 2.52. (Rule 3.45 revised effective 1/1/19)
Rule 3.46. Civil Ex Parte Orders Ex Parte applications for Orders to Shorten Time will be considered only when accompanied by the proposed moving papers. Orders to Shorten Time will be filed only when the motion has been previously filed or is simultaneously filed.
(1) Martinez Civil Fast Track ex parte motions, except in emergency situations, will be heard in each department at times designated by the assigned judge. Consult the court’s website for designated times. Ex parte motions include applications for restraining orders, writs of mandate and prohibition (see ex parte process for writs of mandate below), other extraordinary writs, and appointment of receivers. Applications for such orders must comply with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1203 (except temporary restraining orders under Code of Civil Procedure Section 527.6). (Rule 3.46(1)renumbered effective 7/1/25)
(A) Ex Parte Applications for Orders to Shorten Time will be considered only when
accompanied by the proposed moving papers, unless, in its discretion, the Court
otherwise orders. Orders to Shorten Time will be filed and calendared for hearing
only when the motion has been previously filed or is simultaneously filed (see
signed order for compliance).
(Rule 3.46(1)(A) renumbered effective 7/1/25)
(B) Status Conference and Briefing Schedules for Writs of Mandate. The following
rule applies to all writs of mandate except those in which the Department of Motor
Vehicles is named as respondent. After the Petition is filed in the Clerk’s Office
and a department is assigned, the filing party shall take a copy of the petition along
with a proposed order to the assigned department during ex parte hours. A status
conference for the establishment of a hearing date and briefing schedule for writs
of mandate will be set by the assigned judge during the designated ex parte hours.
The petitioner must comply with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1203 concerning
notice to opposing counsel or unrepresented party of the intent to present an ex
parte application to the Court. The petitioning party need not notify the Court before
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 60 of 200
Page 62¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
presenting the application to set hearing date and briefing schedule. Once the
order is signed and a briefing schedule assigned, the party shall present the order
to the Clerk’s Office for filing.
(Rule 3.46(1)(B) renumbered effective 7/1/25)
(C) A copy of the resulting order concerning the writ is to be delivered to the
department in which the writ will be heard as well as to the Research Attorney’s
Office.
(Rule 3.46(1)(C) r renumbered effective 7/1/25
(2) Sufficient notice should be given to all parties in the time and manner provided by California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1203.
(3) Ex parte applications will be heard only after each party with papers to present has given them to the Court and other counsel who appear, and after both Court and counsel have had adequate time to review them. Therefore, whenever practicable, moving papers should be served on the affected party or that party’s attorney by personal delivery, telecopy (fax), express mail, messenger, or similar means before the hearing. (Rule 3.46(3) renumbered effective 7/1/25)
(4) Guardian ad litem. Requests in cases of Unlimited Jurisdiction, for appointment of a Guardian ad litem should normally not seek appointment of a person that has a claim arising from the same event or conduct. The proposed appointee normally should not be a person that has a possible adverse or conflicting interest with that of the minor. (Rule 3.47(4) r renumbered effective 7/1/25) (Rule 3.46 renumbered effective 7/1/25)
Rule 3.47. Original Orders to Show Cause When an Order to Show Cause has been signed, the original shall be filed immediately in the Clerk’s Office and service shall be effected by a certified copy, for which no charge shall be made. (Rule 3.47 renumbered effective 7/1/25)
Rule 3.48. Continuances Requests for continuance of Law and Motion matters may be by written motion or stipulation. Moving papers must be filed and submitted by 12:00 noon of the court day before the scheduled hearing. (Rule 3.48 renumbered effective 7/1/25)
Rule 3.49. Calendar Matters Heard in Law and Motion Department All motions to consolidate cases, bifurcate issues of liability or other issues, such as statute of limitations or other special defense, or sever consolidated cases or causes of action for trial may
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 61 of 200
Page 63¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
be heard in Law and Motion, or may be reserved for the trial department. Motions to consolidate must be noticed for hearing in the department which is assigned to the lowest numbered case of those cases proposed for consolidation. (Rule 3.49 renumbered effective 7/1/25)
Rule 3.50. Name Change Applications (1) Name change applications are submitted on the Petition for Change of Name (Judicial Council Form NC-100) and Attachment to Petition for Change of Name (Judicial Council Forms NC-110).
(2) The petition must be presented personally by the applicant to the clerk at the Probate window in the Civil Division’s Clerk’s Office and shall be accompanied by the following: (Rule 3.50(2) renumbered effective 7/1/25)
(A) A completed Order to Show Cause for Change of Name (Judicial Council Form
NC-120) that will be signed by the judge.
(B) Photographic proof of identification (California Driver’s License or ID, or similar).
(C) Proof of residency in Contra Costa County (e.g. recent utility bill or tax bill); and
(D) For minors, a birth certificate.
(Rule 3.50 renumbered effective 7/1/25)
Rule 3.51. Motions (a) Proof of Service Unless otherwise ordered, all returns of Proof of Service of Notice of Motions and Orders to Show Cause shall be filed in the Clerk’s Office not less than two (2) calendar days preceding the time set for hearings. (Rule 3.51(a) renumbered effective 7/1/25) (b) Failure to appear Failure of counsel to appear at the time set in the department to which the matter is assigned, unless excused by the judge, shall be deemed cause for placing such matter off calendar, for proceeding to hear the matter in the absence of counsel, or for assessment of costs and sanctions as the Court in its discretion may determine. (Rule 3.51(b) renumbered effective 7/1/25)
(c) Motions after trial All motions after trial until judgment is final shall be heard before the judge who presided over the trial, unless such judge is absent, unavailable or unable to act, in which case the
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 62 of 200
Page 64¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Presiding Judge shall assign an alternate judge; this includes such matters as motions to reopen, motions for new trial, motions for judgment notwithstanding a verdict and hearings on statements of decision. (Rule 3.51(c) renumbered effective 7/1/25)
(d) Papers on file All supporting affidavits, declarations, memoranda of points and authorities, and similar documents shall be attached to the notice of motion, or order to show cause, or other moving papers, when filed. Failure to comply with this requirement shall be deemed cause for taking the matter off calendar. All responsive and opposing documents shall be filed by respondents at least five (5) court days before the day set for hearing. Failure to comply with this requirement shall be deemed cause for acting on the matter without the consideration of documents not so filed. The application of this rule shall not apply to responsive and opposing documents where the moving party has obtained an order shortening time for hearing. This rule shall not be applicable where other time limits are required or provided by law, as in Code of Civil Procedure Section 659a. (Rule 3.51(d) renumbered effective 7/1/25) (Rule 3.51 renumbered effective 7/1/25)
Rule 3.52. Uncontested Calendars (a) Request for hearing Applications for Default Prove Up Hearings, Minor’s Compromises, Adoptions and other uncontested matters requiring hearing shall be made in writing to the Clerk of the Court not less than five (5) calendar days before the hearing. (Rule 3.52(a) renumbered effective 7/1/25) (b) Completion of file No hearing will be set on an uncontested matter until all requisite pleadings and documents have been filed and the clerk has entered the default, unless it is a matter
requiring court entry of default, in which case the Return of Service must be filed before the request for hearing. (Rule 3.52(b) renumbered effective 7/1/25)
(Rule 3.52 renumbered effective 7/1/25)
Rule 3.53. Written Orders (a) Preparation of order
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 63 of 200
Page 65¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Whenever a Judge rules upon a motion, order to show cause, or similar matter, and the matter is uncontested, within ten (10) calendar days, a written order shall be prepared, presented to the Judge for signature, and filed. In any contested matter, where opposing counsel appears, a written order shall be prepared and served by the prevailing party and reviewed by the opposing party, in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. The order shall be prepared whether or not specifically requested by the Court. (Rule 3.53(a) renumbered effective 7/1/25)
(b) Judge's signature Counsel shall not approach the bench for the purpose of obtaining a Judge's signature, during a hearing or trial; documents requiring a Judge's signature shall be presented during recess or given to the Bailiff while the Judge is on the bench. (Rule 3.53(b) renumbered effective 7/1/25) (c) Subsequent applications for orders When an application for an order has been made to the Court or a Judge and has been refused in whole or in part, any subsequent application for the same character of relief, although made upon an alleged different state of facts, shall be made before the Judge making the original order in the case, unless the Judge is absent or unable to act, or shall request the Judge of another department to entertain such application; in all such instances, a full disclosure shall be made to such Judge of any and all such prior applications. See Code of Civil Procedure Section 1008. (Rule 3.53(c) renumbered effective 7/1/25) (Rule 3.53 renumbered effective 7/1/25)
Rule 3.54. Number of Attorneys Examining a Witness Except by stipulation of opposing counsel or by express permission of the Court, only one lawyer representing the same party may examine or cross-examine a witness. (Rule 3.54 renumbered effective 7/1/25)
Chapter 3. Receivers
Rule 3.80. Receivers Appointment of receivers:
(1) In proper cases for the appointment of a receiver or a commissioner, and the Court determines that the appointment of an independent third party is unnecessary and no active management is necessary, court clerks may be appointed to such a position.
(2) Court clerks may not be appointed as a receiver or commissioner by stipulation of counsel.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 64 of 200
Page 66¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(3) Attention is invited to California Rules of Court, 3.1175-3.1184 for provisions relating to appointment of receivers. (Rule 3.80 revised effective 1/1/16)
Chapter 4. Elisors
Rule 3.90. Elisors For rules and procedure regarding the appointment of an elisor, please refer to Local Rule 5.12. (Rule 3.90 new effective 1/1/18)
Chapter 5. Settlements and Settlement Conferences (Not Applicable To Family Law and Probate Matters)
Rule 3.100. Settlements Whenever a civil case has settled, counsel shall immediately notify the Court in writing. If a hearing, conference, or trial is imminent, notice must be given orally to the assigned department followed by a confirmation in writing. The writing must specify when all closing papers will be filed with the Court. If a case settles within five (5) calendar days of the trial date, counsel shall have on file a dismissal, stipulated judgment, or conditional settlement or make an appearance at the time and place designated for trial to place the settlement terms on the record. If a case settles before that time, counsel shall:
(1) Immediately give written notice to the Court, and;
(2) File a request for dismissal, stipulated judgment, or conditional settlement within forty-five (45) calendar days of the written notice of settlement.
If a request for dismissal, stipulated judgment, or conditional settlement is not filed within
forty-five (45) calendar days, an Order to Show Cause shall issue as to why sanctions should not be imposed. Responsive papers to the Order to Show Cause must be filed five (5) court days in advance of the hearing. See California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1385. (Rule 3.100(2) revised effective 1/1/16)
(Rule 3.100 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 3.101. Settlement Conferences On the Court's own motion, all cases, other than short causes, may be calendared for mandatory settlement conferences, upon written or oral notice to all parties involved. At this conference, all parties shall:
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 65 of 200
Page 67¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(1) Have endorsed by the Clerk of the Court and served on all parties five (5) court days before the conference, a written statement of the facts, law and respective contentions of the parties to prove or disprove the right of recovery, items and amount of special damages, nature and extent of injuries incurred and claimed residuals documented by medical report when possible, any wage loss claim showing methods of computation, and any claim for future medical expenses and earnings loss;
(2) Have in attendance all principals or clients. Claims representatives shall be in attendance, unless excused in writing, by the Presiding Judge before the Settlement Conference;
(3) Be prepared to make a bona fide offer of settlement; and
(4) Participate in good faith in the settlement conference. Failure by any such person or entity to file the required written statements, to prepare for, appear at, or participate in a settlement conference, unless good cause is shown for any such failure, may be considered as an unlawful interference with the proceedings of the court and the Court may impose appropriate sanctions including, but not limited to, costs, actual expenses and counsel fees; and further, the Court may vacate the trial date, or order the case to proceed to trial on the date assigned. (Rule 3.101(4) revised effective 1/1/08) (Rule 3.101 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 3.102. Special Needs Trusts Proposed orders for the placing of the proceeds of a court judgment or settlement into a special needs trust must provide a place for the Court to assign a date in the Probate Department for the first annual review of the operation of the trust. A review date will be assigned in all cases of the approval of such a trust. (Rule 3.102 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 3.103. Special Bench Bar Settlement Conferences (BBSC) Specialized BBSC settlement proceedings may be held at such times as are designated by the Presiding Judge. (Rule 3.103 revised effective 1/1/15)
Chapter 6. ADR
(Not Applicable to Family Law Matters and Probate Matters)
Rule 3.200. Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs (a) Availability of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Programs Judges in the Contra Costa County Superior Court encourage parties involved in lawsuits to use ADR to resolve their disputes without trial. The Court offers several ADR Programs in general civil and probate cases. The Court also provides mediation services in juvenile
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 66 of 200
Page 68¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
dependency and child custody and visitation cases and collaborates with community ADR providers to offer mediation in small claims, guardianship, civil harassment, and unlawful detainer cases.
(b) Application of these rules These rules apply to all court–administered ADR Programs except Child Custody Recommending Counseling (mediation) sessions available from family court services (which is governed separately by the California Family Code, related rules of court, and case law), community mediation services (provided in some small claims, civil harassment, guardianship, juvenile dependency, and unlawful detainer cases), and assignment of temporary judges to hear regular court calendars. (c) Duty to meet and confer In the event parties to a civil action agree to use ADR before their first Case Management Conference, they are encouraged to use the appropriate local court form:
(1) CV-655b – Stipulation and Order to Attend ADR and Delay First Case
Management Conference 90 Days (Unlimited Jurisdiction Civil Cases)
(2) CV-659d – Stipulation to Attend ADR and Delay First Case Management
Conference 90 Days (Limited Jurisdiction Civil Cases)
(d) Voluntary participation Participation in any of the Court’s ADR Programs is strongly encouraged and voluntary unless otherwise provided by law, Judge or Local Rule. Parties may choose an ADR option on the Case Management Form (Judicial Council Form CM-110), or by filing one of two local court forms included in the plaintiff’s packet:
(1) (For Limited Jurisdiction cases) - a Stipulation to Attend ADR and Delay First Case
Management Conference 90 Days (Local Court Form CV-659d), or
(2) (For Unlimited Jurisdiction cases) – a Stipulation and Order to Attend ADR and
Delay First Case Management Conference 90 Days (Local Court Form CV-655b).
Parties may also agree (stipulate) orally or in writing to use ADR at any time.
(e) Opening an ADR case To open a civil or probate ADR case, parties must contact the ADR Program’s Office. Once a case is opened, the parties will receive a list of panel members with expertise in their type of case. The parties must make their own decision about whether a panel member has the needed expertise, and can help the parties to complete ADR before the Court deadline. All parties must agree on the panel member who will handle the ADR portion of their court case. Parties with child custody and visitation, guardianship, juvenile dependency, small claims, civil harassment and unlawful detainer cases will get separate instructions from the judge assigned to hear their case. (f) Standard ADR case management timelines
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 67 of 200
Page 69¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Unless the judge makes different arrangements to accommodate circumstances in individual cases, parties can expect that they must choose their mediator, arbitrator, or neutral case evaluator within fourteen (14) calendar days of the matter being referred to ADR. The Court and ADR Department will tell the parties how long they have to finish ADR.
ADR sessions may be scheduled at the parties’ and panel members’ convenience, as long as they meet the court–ordered ADR completion deadlines.
(g) Blending or changing ADR processes The Court allows parties to engage in more than one ADR process over the life of their case, as well as to change between most ADR processes only if:
(1) All parties notify both the Judicial and ADR Department as soon as is practicable
of their intent to change processes.
(2) All parties and the ADR panel member ensure there are clear distinctions made
and an agreement signed regarding which ADR processes and associated rules
apply to their discussions, court deadlines, and work product.
(h) Changing or abandoning ADR Some ADR processes are confidential (private) and others are not. Once the Court has made an ADR order, the parties must have permission from the judge to change the ADR process, or to cancel ADR altogether. (i) ADR panel member requirements All ADR panel members must meet the training, education, and experience requirements for the mediation, arbitration, neutral case evaluation, and settlement mentor panels. People interested in serving on the Court’s ADR panel must complete and update their panel member information as changes occur. If selected to serve on a particular case, panel members must complete and submit all forms and follow all of the Court's Ethical and Practice Standards listed in section seven of these rules. (j) Complaints ADR Program participants are encouraged to discuss any concerns they have about the ADR process or a panel member’s conduct with the panel member first. Consistent with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.865, the Court will address party complaints as follows:
(1) The party must make a written complaint to the ADR Program Director.
(2) If the ADR Program Director cannot resolve the complaint informally, the written
complaint will be forwarded to the Presiding Judge or, at the Presiding Judge’s
discretion the Supervising Civil Judge. The panel member must answer the
complaint in writing, and a copy of that answer will be given to the person or people
making the complaint.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 68 of 200
Page 70¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(3) If the complaint remains unresolved,the Presiding Judge or Supervising Civil
Judge and ADR Program Director will convene a review panel to consider the
complaint. If the Supervising Judge finds the complaint to be valid, he/she may
reprimand the panel member, suspend the panel member until he/she has
completed additional training, or remove the panel member from one or all of the
Court’s ADR Program panels.
(k) Service of ADR member Service as an ADR panel member, and the appearance of a panel member’s name on panel lists is at the sole discretion of the Supervising Civil Judge and/or his or her designee. Panel members’ services can be terminated without cause, reason, or notice at any time. The Court is under no obligation to use any panel member’s services now or in the future. (l) Panel member evaluation The Court will periodically evaluate each panel member’s performance. In the event performance issues are identified, the Court may:
(1) Contact the panel member informally or formally to address and resolve any
identified issues;
(2) Suggest or require the panel member to attend additional training, or establish a
mentoring relationship with an experienced practitioner;
(3) Issue a formal or information reprimand, suspend the panel member, or remove
him or her from the panel.
(Rule 3.200 revised effective 1/1/25)
Rule 3.201. Mediation (a) Mediation Mediation allows people to focus on the issues at the heart of their dispute. Mediation conferences are informal. Most mediators start out talking with all the parties together. Later, the mediator may meet with each party separately. Mediators often ask each party to list the issues in dispute, and to offer their ideas for settlement. People often discuss and exchange documents or other information before or during mediation, but do not present evidence as they would in court. Mediators have different ways of handling the mediation process. For example, some mediators are more evaluative and are willing to tell the parties what they think a case is worth or how they think the case might turn out if it went to trial. Other mediators are more facilitative and tend to focus on helping the parties to negotiate and reach agreements of their own design. Parties are free to decide which mediation style they prefer. No matter what approach a mediator takes, he or she is not the decision maker. Agreements can only be reached if all the mediating parties accept the proposed solution. (b) Mediator selection
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 69 of 200
Page 71¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
All mediating parties must agree on a mediator and complete a Selection of ADR Panel
Member (Local Court Form ADR-201) by the selection deadline provided by the ADR Program Coordinator unless the judge sets a different selection deadline. Parties must forward the Selection form to the ADR Program’s Office. If the parties cannot agree on a mediator, the Court or ADR Department may appoint one. Once a mediator has been chosen, the ADR Programs Office will then file and serve a Notice of Assignment on all parties and the Mediator.
(c) Mediator qualifications Although most of the Court’s mediators are also attorneys, some panel members are professionals and experts from other fields such as: accounting, business, construction, finance, psychology, and real estate.
(1) Mediators appointed to the panel after January 1, 2006 must:
(A) Have completed an initial 40-hour comprehensive mediation training
program that encompasses commonly recognized mediation principles and
practices including: confidentiality, voluntary participation, communicating
clearly, listening effectively, facilitating communication among all
participants, promoting exploration of mutually acceptable settlement
options, and conducting oneself in a neutral manner;
(B) Have mediated five (5) cases or co-mediated at least ten (10) cases. Each
mediation counted for this purpose must have lasted two or more hours;
and
(C) Be familiar with ethical standards as adopted by state and national
professional organizations, and with the Uniform Mediation Act.
(2) Alternative qualifications:
A person who does not meet all of the requirements of (c)(1)(a) and (c)(1)(b) may
still qualify to be a mediator for the Court if he/she provides the Court ADR
Committee or its designee with satisfactory evidence of sufficient alternative
education, training, skills and experience. Acceptance of alternative qualifications
is at the discretion of the Court ADR Committee and/or its designee. The Court is
under no obligation to accept alternative qualifications.
(3) All mediation panel members must:
(A) Attend at least four (4) hours of continuing education or training related to
the practice of mediation every three years. At least 2 hour(s) of education
or training must address ethics, fairness, and bias issues in the mediation
context. At least 1 hour of that education or training must address practice
and ethical issues that arise when parties are not represented by an
attorney.
(B) Certify that they meet the requirements of this rule every three years
following their appointment as a mediator to the Court ADR panel.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 70 of 200
Page 72¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(C) Agree to abide by the ethical principles established by California Rules of
Court, Rules 3.850 et seq. and comply with the competence standards
established by California Rules of Court, Rule 3.856.
(d) Mediation fees The Court’s mediation panel members shall not charge fees for the first 30 minutes of case scheduling and preparation time, or for the first two hours of mediation conference time. If more time is needed, the parties must pay that mediator’s hourly fee for the time used. Parties who have had their court filing fees waived (cancelled), may ask the ADR Programs Department to contact the mediator and find out if that party’s mediation fees may also be waived. Parties are encouraged to have a written agreement with the panel member regarding fees and the management of their ADR case. (e) Attendance at mediation Unless excused by the assigned judge before mediation starts, all trial lawyers, principals, clients, claims representatives, and other appropriate decision–makers must attend mediation in person. Telephone standby is not allowed unless approved by the assigned judge before mediation starts. (f) Confidentiality Court–connected mediations are confidential (private) per California Evidence Code Sections 1115–1128. The mediator cannot be called to testify in court about what happened or what was said in mediation. Except as otherwise provided by law or these rules, court staff, the mediator, all parties, all attorneys, and any other people facilitating or participating in the mediation process must treat all written and oral communications made in or during mediation, as confidential. The only exceptions to confidentiality in mediation are:
(1) The law or any other mandate requires the information to be reported; or
(2) The ADR panel member thinks there might be a danger of serious physical harm
either to a party or to another person.
(g) Mediation statements Parties must prepare and give information about their case to the mediator and other parties at least five (5) court days before the mediation hearing. Mediation statements must not be longer than five (5) pages and must contain the following information:
(1) The name and title (or relationship to the case) of all people who will attend
mediation;
(2) A list of people connected with other parties who, if present at mediation, might
improve the chances of settlement;
(3) A brief statement of the important issues, and the party's views on liability and
damages;
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 71 of 200
Page 73¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(4) A list of legal or factual issues that, if narrowed or resolved early, would promote
settlement;
(5) A brief description of the history and status of any settlement negotiations; and
(6) Copies of any court or other documents that will help the mediator understand the
issues in dispute.
(h) Mediator’s report The mediator must forward a copy of the completed Mediator’s Report (Local Court Form ADR-305) to the ADR Program’s Office, counsel, and all self-represented parties. This form is available online at https://www.cc-courts.org/civil/alternative-dispute- resolution.aspx. (i) Blending or changing ADR processes The Court allows parties to engage in more than one ADR process over the life of their case as well as to change between most ADR processes only if:
(1) All parties notify both the judicial and ADR Department as soon as is practicable
of their intent to change processes, and
(2) The parties and the ADR panel member must ensure there are clear distinctions
made and an agreement signed regarding which ADR processes and associated
rules apply to their discussions, court deadlines, and work product.
(Rule 3.201 revised effective 1/1/25)
Rule 3.202. Judicial Arbitration (a) Judicial Arbitration Judicial Arbitration is less formal than a court hearing. It allows the parties under oath, to present their case, offer witness testimony, and get a decision. California Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.10 et seq. allows the Court to require all cases where the amount in dispute is $50,000 or less to be submitted either to judicial arbitration or to mediation if the judge finds it to be appropriate in a particular case. Cases may also go to judicial arbitration if the person who made the complaint agrees to limit his or her recovery to $50,000, or if the parties all agree to use arbitration. The award (arbitrator’s decision) must be filed with the Court within ten (10) calendar days of the last hearing. If either party disagrees with the arbitration award, he or she may ask the Court to review the case by filing a request for a new court hearing (called a Trial De Novo). The arbitration award becomes a court order unless one of the parties files for a Trial De Novo within sixty (60) calendar days or another time limit set by the judge. (b) Arbitrator selection All parties must agree on an arbitrator and complete a Selection of ADR Panel Member (Local Court Form ADR-201) by the selection deadline provided by the ADR Program
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 72 of 200
Page 74¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Coordinator , unless the judge sets a different selection deadline. Parties must forward this form to the ADR Program’s Office. If the parties cannot agree on an arbitrator, the assigned judge may appoint one. The ADR Program’s Office will then file and serve on all parties and the Arbitrator a “Notice of Assignment.”
(c) Arbitrator qualifications Arbitrators must be licensed California attorneys and have an oath of office on file with the ADR Program’s Office unless the parties jointly agree by stipulation to appoint an arbitrator with other qualifications. (d) Arbitration fees Under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1141.18, arbitrators in judicial arbitration cases are paid $150 per case or $150 per day if the arbitration takes more than one day. All of the arbitrators on the Court's panel have agreed either to donate their services, or to be paid by the parties at the rate described in this section. (e) Attendance at arbitration As long as all trial attorneys, parties, and other people needed to present the case and answer the arbitrator’s questions are included, the parties may choose who will attend arbitration. (f) Arbitration statements Parties must prepare and give information about their case to the judicial arbitrator and other parties at least five (5) court days before the arbitration hearing. This information must not be longer than five (5) pages and must include:
(1) The name and title (or relationship to the case) of all people who will attend
arbitration;
(2) A brief statement of the legal and factual issues in the case, and the party's views
on liability and damages; and
(3) Copies of any documents that will help the arbitrator understand the issues in
dispute.
(g) Blending or changing ADR processes The Court allows parties to engage in more than one ADR process over the life of their case, as well as to convert most ADR processes only if:
(1) All parties notify both the Judicial and ADR Department as soon as is practicable
of their intent to change processes, and
(2) The parties and the ADR panel member ensure there are clear distinctions made
and an agreement signed regarding which ADR processes and associated rules
apply to their discussions, court deadlines, and work product.
(Rule 3.202 revised effective 1/1/25)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 73 of 200
Page 75¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 3.203. Settlement Mentors (a) Settlement Mentor conferences The assigned judge may refer, or the parties may ask for a conference with a settlement mentor either on the morning of trial, or earlier in the case. These informal conferences usually last about two hours. These processes are not the same as mediation, and are not confidential per Evidence Code Sections 1115-1128. Parties meet with an attorney who has significant litigation experience with similar cases (called a settlement mentor) to review the issues, analyze the case, and consider settlement recommendations. The parties do not present evidence, and witnesses are not called. Although information may be shared with the settlement mentor and not shared with the other party, any information given to the settlement mentor may be shared with the judge. When appropriate, the settlement mentor may involve the judge in the settlement discussions. (b) Selection of Settlement Mentors Settlement mentors are assigned by the ADR Program’s Department based on their stated areas of expertise, and in consultation with the assigned judge. (c) Settlement Mentor qualifications Settlement mentors are attorneys who have background experience in the issues involved in the case. (d) Settlement Mentor fees Settlement mentors may not charge any fees for their services unless the parties agree to continue settlement discussions with the settlement mentor at his/her usual fee. (Rule 3.203(d) revised effective 1/1/17) (e) Attendance at the Settlement Mentor conference All trial attorneys, principals, clients, claims representatives, and other decision makers must attend the settlement mentor conference. Telephone standby is not allowed unless approved by the assigned judge before the conference begins. (f) Confidentiality Although information given during the settlement mentor conference may be shared with the judge, everyone attending (including court staff, the settlement mentor, all parties and all attorneys), must treat all written and oral communications made in or during the settlement conference as confidential.
When the judge will not be trier of fact, the mentor may report to the judge the settlement positions of the parties to help the parties reach an agreement.
(g) Blending, changing, or converting ADR processes Although the Court allows parties to engage in more than one ADR process over the life of their case, they may not convert settlement mentor conferences into any other ADR
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 74 of 200
Page 76¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
process unless they have first asked for and received permission from the Judge scheduled to hear that case.
(Rule 3.203 revised effective 1/1/17)
Rule 3.204. Neutral Case Evaluation (a) Neutral Case Evaluation This program allows litigants and their lawyers to meet with an experienced trial attorney to get an independent opinion about their case, and about likely outcomes if their case were to go to trial (to the extent this is possible in a jury trial system). Evaluators can also help the parties develop a cost–effective plan for exchanging information (or managing discovery) and handling their cases. While commercial, business, real estate, personal injury, and contract matters often benefit from this program; any case might gain from this process if there are only two or three parties, and if there are more than just legal questions to resolve. Because this program does not involve negotiation or other settlement discussions, some parties use the evaluator’s recommendations to negotiate their own agreement. Others choose another ADR Program (such as mediation or arbitration) to settle their cases. (b) Selection and assignment of Neutral Case Evaluators All parties must agree on an evaluator and complete a Selection of ADR Panel Member (Local Court Form ADR-201) by the selection deadline provided by the ADR Program Coordinator, unless the judge sets a different selection deadline. Parties must forward this form to the ADR Program’s Office. If the parties cannot agree on an evaluator, the assigned judge may appoint one. The ADR Program’s Office will then file and serve a Notice of Assignment on all parties and the evaluator. (c) Neutral Case Evaluator qualifications Evaluators are attorneys who have significant litigation experience and background in the issues involved in the case. (d) Neutral Case Evaluation fees The Court’s neutral case evaluators shall not charge fees for the first 30 minutes of case scheduling and preparation time, or for the first two hours of evaluation conference time. If more time is needed, the parties must pay that evaluator’s hourly fee for the time used. Parties who have had their court filing fees cancelled (waived), may ask whether the neutral case evaluator is willing to waive that party’s fees. Parties are encouraged to have a written agreement with the panel member regarding fees and the management of their ADR case. (e) Attendance at the Neutral Case Evaluation Conference All trial lawyers, principals, clients, claims representatives, and other decision–makers shall attend the evaluation conference. Telephone standby is not permitted unless approved in advance by the assigned judge.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 75 of 200
Page 77¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(f) Admissibility of Neutral Case Evaluation findings Neutral case evaluation is not confidential unless the parties and evaluator agree otherwise, and sign an agreement to that effect. (g) Neutral Case Evaluation statements Parties must prepare and give information about their case to the neutral case evaluator and other parties at least five (5) court days before the evaluation hearing. This information must not be longer than five (5) pages and must include:
(1) The name and title (or relationship to the case) of all people who will attend the
neutral case evaluation conference;
(2) A brief statement of the important issues in the case, and the party's views on
liability and damages;
(3) The legal or factual issues to be resolved; and,
(4) Copies of any court or other documents that will help the evaluator understand the
issues in dispute.
(h) Blending or changing ADR processes The Court allows parties to engage in more than one ADR process over the life of their case, as well as to convert most ADR processes only if:
(1) All parties notify both the judicial and ADR Department as soon as practicable of
their intent to change processes, and
(2) The parties and the ADR panel member ensure there are clear distinctions made
and an agreement signed regarding which ADR processes and associated rules
apply to their discussions, court deadlines, and work product.
(Rule 3.204 revised effective 1/1/25)
Rule 3.205. Temporary Judge Trial - Civil Division Applicable to Civil Cases (not including juvenile or family law cases)
(a) Temporary Judge trials Some parties with civil cases want to choose when their case will be tried, and so will agree to have the Court appoint a temporary judge to hear their case. (This is permitted by Article 6, Section 21 of the State Constitution and Rule 2.831 of the California Rules of Court.) Except for appeals in small claims cases (may also be heard by temporary judges), or court appearances where a temporary judge has been appointed to call a particular calendar, these trials are held at a time and location that is convenient for the parties and the temporary judge. Temporary judges have nearly the same authority as a superior court judge. Except for small claims appeal cases or times when the Court
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 76 of 200
Page 78¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
appoints a temporary judge to call a particular calendar, parties choose the temporary
judge from a list maintained by the ADR Program’s Office. Temporary judge trials are
handled in the same way as other civil trials, except that the trial may not take more than
five (5) court days, there is no option for a jury trial, and the temporary judge might not
have assistance from a court clerk or other support staff. If the case involves a litigant
who has been granted a fee waiver under Government Code section 68631 et seq. and is
a limited civil matter, the Court will provide electronic recording of the trial, provided the
parties stipulate that the trial is to occur in a courtroom equipped with the necessary
equipment and at a time where the courtroom is otherwise available. If the case involves
a litigant who has been granted a fee waiver under Government Code section 68631 et
seq. and is an unlimited civil matter, the Court will provide a court reporter, provided the
parties stipulate that the trial is to occur at a place and time convenient for the Court to
provide a reporter. Any party or parties who have not been granted a fee waiver must pay
the applicable court reporter’s attendance fee pursuant to Government Code sections
68086(a)(1)(A) or (B). The parties in a temporary judge trial can appeal the temporary
judge’s decision in the same way as following a trial by an assigned sitting judge.
Whenever possible, each party must also:
(1) Pre–mark all exhibits; and
(2) Give the temporary judge an exhibit list, witness list, and opening statement.
(Rule 3.205(a) revised effective 1/1/19)
(b) Qualification of Temporary Judges Consistent with California Rules of Court, Rules 2.810 et seq. all attorneys who act as temporary judges must have been active members of the State Bar for a minimum of ten (10) years, must be active members of the State Bar at the time of appointment, must meet the initial and ongoing training requirements established by California Rules of Court, 2.812 – 15 and established court policy, and must not be the subject of any pending State Bar disciplinary proceeding. Further, all attorneys who act as temporary judges must certify that he/she has not pled guilty or no contest to a felony, or has not been convicted of a felony that has not been reversed. Retired judges need not be active members of the bar as long as they are in compliance with all requirements of the assigned judge’s rules and obligations as established by the Judicial Council of California. Retired commissioners must be active members in good standing with the State Bar of California, but are exempt from the requirement to have been active with the State Bar and free of any State Bar discipline for ten (10) years before their service as a temporary judge.
(Rule 3.205 revised effective 1/1/19)
Rule 3.206. Ethical and Practice Standards for ADR Panel Members (a) General responsibilities People serving on the Court's ADR Panel must be familiar with and follow all state or federal laws, California Rules of Court, Local Court Rules, and relevant professional or ADR–specific standards of practice. Further, panel members have a duty to the parties,
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 77 of 200
Page 79¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
the Court and themselves to be honest and diligent, to act in good faith, and to not advance their own interests at the parties’ expense.
ADR panel members must be reasonably available to schedule ADR conferences, and must make an effort to expedite the ADR process.
(b) Neutrality ADR panel members must be neutral and act fairly in dealing with the parties. In these rules, neutrality is defined as “freedom from favoritism or bias by appearance, word, or action, and a commitment to serve all parties as opposed to a single party.” Further, the mediator may not have a personal interest in the case, and cannot show bias toward individuals and institutions involved in the dispute.
(c) Conflict of interest – definition Conflicts of interest include (but are not limited to) personal or professional relationships with a party such as: legal representation by the panel member or his or her law firm; representation in business, real property, tax preparation, or other transactions; and, service as a consultant, advisor, therapist, or other expert. All parties should ask panel members whether there would be a conflict of interest if he or she accepted the case. All panel members must disclose any personal or professional relationships that might create a conflict of interest before accepting a case assignment. If there is an actual or perceived conflict of interest, the parties may jointly decide to continue working with that panel member, or contact the ADR Program’s Office to choose another panel member. (d) Conflict of interest – duty to disclose Per California Rules of Court, Rule 3.855, panel members have an ongoing duty to disclose actual or potential conflicts of interest. Panel members must disclose personal or professional relationships with a party, including but not limited to, legal representation by the panel member or his or her law firm representation in business, real property, tax preparation, or other transactions and service as a consultant, advisor, therapist, or other expert. If there is an actual or perceived conflict of interest, the parties may jointly decide to keep working with that panel member, or contact the ADR Program’s Office to choose another panel member. (e) Solicitation by panel members Panel members must accurately state their qualifications, and must not make misleading claims about any ADR process, its costs and benefits, or its outcome. Panel members must not ask for or accept business from an ADR participant (either as a neutral, consultant, or representative in any other professional capacity) while that ADR proceeding is pending. (f) Confidentiality
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 78 of 200
Page 80¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Except as otherwise provided, panel members must treat all written and oral communications made in or during an ADR process as confidential to the extent provided by the California Evidence Code and relevant case law.
(g) Role of the panel member in settlement Panel members should help the parties to discuss the issues in dispute, and to carefully consider any proposed settlement options. Further, the panel member must try to identify and limit inappropriate pressures to settle the case. In order to protect the neutrality of his or her role, the panel member may find it advisable, for example, to encourage parties to seek independent advice from legal or other professionals. (h) Unrepresented interests Panel members must consider the possibility that people not attending an ADR conference may be affected by the results. The panel member has a duty to encourage the parties to fully consider such interests when in his or her judgment is appropriate to do so. (i) Informed consent Panel members have an ongoing duty to ensure that all parties understand the process and procedures associated with their ADR case. Further, the panel member must make every effort to ensure that the parties understand the panel member’s role, and the limits to that role, in managing the ADR process, getting expert advice, and making decisions. Panel members should always have written agreements with the parties in a particular case regarding hourly fees and the management of the ADR case. (j) Knowledge of ADR process A panel member must only accept responsibility for delivering ADR services when reasonably certain that he or she has sufficient knowledge, training, or other expertise to administer that process appropriately, and in a way that helps the parties to participate effectively. (k) Pro bono contributions and fees for service Panel members must follow the Court's policies regarding ADR services that will be provided at no cost to the parties, and ADR services that may be compensated at the panel member's normal rate. Panel members must prepare billing or invoice statements to the parties that clearly state the purpose for all fees, and reflect the required pro bono service contribution. Specifically:
(1) Panel members will provide their services at no cost to the parties or the Court
when serving as a settlement mentor or as a temporary judge.
(2) Panel members will limit their fees for judicial arbitration to $150 per day or per
case, and will look to the parties for payment of these fees.
(3) Panel members will provide the first thirty minutes of case preparation and
scheduling, and the first two hours of mediation and neutral case evaluation
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 79 of 200
Page 81¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
conference time at no charge. If the parties request additional time, or additional time is required to provide the requested mediation or evaluation services, the panel member may, with the parties’ agreement, charge their normal rates for actual time spent.
(l) Advance deposits for Mediation or Neutral Case Evaluation services Mediators and evaluators may require the parties to pay a deposit against anticipated mediation or evaluation fees. If the panel member requests a deposit against anticipated fees, he or she may only charge the parties for actual time spent or services provided, and refund any balance due. Mediators and evaluators may not require parties to pay a non - refundable fee for a “minimum” number of mediation or evaluation hours. (m) Complete and return all ADR forms Panel members must complete and return, as appropriate, all local and state forms as directed by the Court or the ADR Program’s Office. (Rule 3.206 revised effective 1/1/16)
Chapter 7. Discovery Motions and the Optional Discovery Facilitator Program
Rule 3.300. Optional Discovery Facilitator Program In an attempt to avoid protracted, costly and unnecessary discovery disputes, Civil and Probate Departments listed on the Court’s website provide the option for parties to participate in the Discovery Facilitator Program (“Program”) before filing motions in Court to compel discovery or motions for a discovery-related protective order, except as set forth below, or unless the Court specifically orders otherwise. This includes motions pursuant to CCP Section 1987.1. Cases exempt from the Discovery Facilitator Program The following discovery disputes are not subject to the Program:
(a) Cases in which there has been no response to discovery requests. Motions to compel under Code of Civil Procedure, Sections 2030.290(b) or 2031.300(b) shall be filed directly with the Court. .
(b) Cases in which trial is less than sixty (60) days away.
(c) Motions necessitated solely by a third party’s refusal to comply with a subpoena.
(d) Those disputes specifically exempted by the trial judge. (Rule 3.300 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 3.301. Discovery Motions and the Discovery Facilitator Program (a) Optional referral to Discovery Facilitator Program
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 80 of 200
Page 82¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(1) Parties to a Discovery Motion who wish to use the Program must first complete: 1)
a Stipulation to Participate in Discovery Facilitator Program and Toll Related Filing
Deadlines (Local Court Form ADR-602); and 2) a Request for Assignment of
Discovery Facilitator (Local Court Form ADR-610). Both forms must be submitted
to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Office of the Contra Costa County
Superior Court, either by fax to 925-608-2109, or by email to
ADRdiscoveryfacilitator@contracosta.courts.ca.gov.
A copy of the Request for Assignment of Discovery Facilitator shall also be served
on all parties to the action.
The Request for Assignment of Discovery Facilitator (Local Court Form ADR-610)
shall provide the name and the fax number and email address of the party who
intends to file the Discovery Motion, of all other parties against whom the motion
will be filed, and of all other parties in the action.
(2) Discovery Facilitators are experienced attorneys who are volunteering their time
to assist the Court in resolving these disputes. There is no cost for participation in
the Program. The Court does not expect any Discovery Facilitator to spend more
than 4 hours on a case. If the Discovery Facilitator estimates that a case may take
more than 4 hours, he or she may decline the case by sending a completed “Notice
of Termination of Appointment of Discovery Facilitator” (Local Court Form ADR-
615) stating that the matter is expected to take longer than 4 hours to the ADR
Office.
(3) Cases that are not subject to the Discovery Facilitator Program pursuant to Local
Rule 3 — 301(a)(3) will be set for OSC or a Discovery Conference within sixty (60)¶
Rule 3.301(a)(3) will be set for OSC or a Discovery Conference within sixty (60) days. The Court will preview the issues with the parties, give guidance on alternatives, and encourage meaningful “meet and confer” sessions and discussion of the need to appoint a Discovery Referee. The Court may set a date for hearing on a discovery motion, or impose issue or monetary sanctions, as appropriate. (b) Discovery Facilitators (1) The Martinez Civil Clerk’s Office shall maintain a list of Discovery Facilitators. Cases shall be assigned to Discovery Facilitators in the order in which they appear on the list.
(2) Before notifying the parties of the assignment of a Discovery Facilitator, the ADR
Office shall contact the proposed Discovery Facilitator to confirm availability and
willingness to serve.
(3) Within three (3) calendar days of being contacted, the proposed Discovery
Facilitator shall perform a conflict of interest check. A Discovery Facilitator shall
decline the assignment if he or she knows of facts that would serve as grounds for
disqualification under CCP § 170.1 if the Discovery Facilitator were a Judicial
Officer. The Discovery Facilitator shall also inform the ADR Office of any
disclosures he or she deems appropriate to be forwarded to the parties.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 81 of 200
Page 83¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(4) Discovery Facilitators shall have the following minimum requirements: 10 years of
experience in Civil or Probate Litigation.
(c) Assignment of Discovery Facilitator (1) The ADR Office shall serve a Notice of Assignment of Discovery Facilitator (Local Court Form ADR-612) within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of a Request for Assignment of Discovery Facilitator.
(2) Rejection of Assigned Discovery Facilitator.
(A) Parties to the proposed motion shall have ten (10) calendar days after
service of the Notice of Assignment to serve on the ADR Office and the
parties in the action a Rejection of Assigned Discovery Facilitator (Local
Court Form ADR-617). If the Discovery Facilitator is rejected, a second
Discovery Facilitator will be appointed. If any party rejects the second
Discovery Facilitator, the ADR Coordinator shall notify the parties that the
matter will not proceed in the Program.
(B) If no Rejection of Assigned Discovery Facilitator is served within ten (10)
calendar days of service of the original Notice of Assignment of Discovery
Facilitator, the Notice of Assignment of Discovery Facilitator is confirmed.
(d) Hearing of discovery dispute (1) The Discovery Facilitator shall hold a hearing on the discovery dispute no later than thirty (30) days after confirmation of the assignment of the Discovery Facilitator. Parties may stipulate in writing to extend the 30-day deadline or it may be extended by the Facilitator for good cause that supersedes the policy of the Program for expedited resolution.
(2) One of the purposes of this Discovery Facilitator Program is to narrow the number
of discovery disputes, should a hearing ever be required before a judicial officer.
Another purpose is to allow for informal resolution of discovery disputes at a lower
cost to the parties than they would otherwise incur. Therefore, the format of briefing
done for a hearing before a Discovery Facilitator should be brief, practical, and
informal. Within these guidelines, the Discovery Facilitator has the discretion to
determine the format of briefing required or whether any briefing will be required,
and the schedule for service of such briefing. The Discovery Facilitator shall also
have discretion to determine the structure of the hearing, including appearances
by telephone or video.
(3) If the Discovery Facilitator determines that the hearing cannot be scheduled or
completed within thirty (30) days of the date of confirmation of the assignment of
the Discovery Facilitator because of conduct of one of the parties, the Discovery
Facilitator shall issue a Finding of Non-Compliance, specifying the party and/or
attorney responsible. In the event a formal Discovery Motion is subsequently filed,
the moving party shall attach a copy of the Finding of Noncompliance to its papers
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 82 of 200
Page 84¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
as an exhibit and may submit a brief, factual, non-argumentative recitation of the
facts regarding the non-compliance.
(4) The Discovery Facilitator Program is not a mediation program. The Discovery
Facilitators are not mediators, and the proceedings under this Program are not
subject to mediation confidentiality rules. While the Facilitator may encourage
compromises in discussion at or before the hearing in order to narrow or settle
disputes, Discovery Facilitators should not simply try to produce a compromise at
any cost. In making his or her recommendations, the Discovery Facilitator will give
an opinion on the merits of the dispute in a manner that he or she believes is
consistent with applicable law.
(5) If the discovery dispute is completely resolved at or before the hearing, the parties
will confirm the terms of the resolution in writing, and the appointment of the
Discovery Facilitator will terminate automatically, unless the Discovery Facilitator
and the parties agree that the Facilitator will continue to serve.
(6) If the discovery dispute is not completely resolved at the hearing, the Discovery
Facilitator shall, within ten (10) days of the completion of the hearing, serve a
document on the parties entitled “Recommendations of Discovery Facilitator and
Termination of Appointment of Discovery Facilitator” (Local Court Form ADR-616).
The Recommendation may be on the merits of the motion, may be a
recommendation that the matter be referred to the assigned judge for decision,
may be that the parties are ordered to meet and confer and to provide a report to
the Court of the results of such meeting and the matters that remain in dispute, or
that a formal Discovery Referee be appointed. The Discovery Facilitator may
require the substantially prevailing party to do the initial draft of the
recommendations. If so, this initial draft shall not be required to be sent to the
opposing party for approval as to form, but rather will be sent directly to the
Discovery Facilitator.
(7) The date the Discovery Facilitator serves the “Recommendations of Discovery
Facilitator and Termination of Appointment of Discovery Facilitator” (Local Court
Form ADR-616) shall be the date of termination of the Program for purposes of the
tolling agreement of the parties provided in Local Court Form ADR-602. The
motion filing deadline shall be per statute including any tolling period agreed to by
the parties. Any moving papers shall include, as the first exhibit, a declaration that
the parties have completed the Discovery Facilitator Program and shall attach the
Recommendations of Discovery Facilitator and Termination of Appointment of
Discovery Facilitator as part of the exhibit. To the extent feasible, motions from
parties who have completed the Discovery Facilitator process will receive calendar
preference over other discovery motions.
(8) If for any reason the Discovery Facilitator fails to serve the Recommendations of
Discovery Facilitator and Termination of Appointment of Discovery Facilitator, the
parties shall notify the ADR Coordinator at
ADRdiscoveryfacilitator@contracosta.courts.ca.gov. The ADR Coordinator shall
contact the Discovery Facilitator. If for any reason the ADR Coordinator is unable
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 83 of 200
Page 85¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
to obtain the Recommendations, the ADR Coordinator shall notify the parties and
terminate participation in the Program.
(9) The court will consider the Recommendations of the Discovery Facilitator in
deciding the merits of the motion. The purpose of this Discovery Facilitator
Program is to facilitate discovery and the resolution of discovery disputes without,
or with minimal, court supervision, given current budgetary restraints on the court.
(e) Urgent discovery motions (1) Parties participating in the Program may present an ex parte application to the Court to shorten all time frames set forth in this Rule upon a showing of good cause. (f) Compensation of Discovery Facilitators (1) Recognizing the importance of the principle of maintaining access to justice, and the fact that there is only a nominal fee for filing a Discovery Motion to be heard before a judicial officer, Discovery Facilitators shall serve without any monetary compensation. The parties to the discovery dispute are counseled to bear in mind that the Discovery Facilitators are donating their time and grant them the courtesy and respect the parties would grant to a judicial officer, and minimize the paperwork that they serve on the Discovery Facilitators.
(2) If the parties choose to use the services of the Discovery Facilitator after
completion of the assignment, compensation shall be pursuant to agreement of
the Facilitator and the parties, which agreement should be confirmed in writing.
(3) The policy of the Program is that a Discovery Facilitator will handle only one
assignment per case without compensation. If there is more than one Request for
Assignment of Discovery Facilitator in a case, the parties may use the Facilitator
for the second assignment if an agreement is reached for compensation of the
Facilitator. Otherwise, the second Request for Assignment of Discovery Facilitator
will be assigned to a different Discovery Facilitator.
(g) Forms used in Discovery Facilitator Program Stipulation to Participate in Discovery Facilitator Program and Toll Related Filing Deadlines Local Court Form ADR-602 Request for Assignment of Discovery Facilitator Local Court Form ADR-610 Notice of Assignment of Discovery Facilitator Local Court Form ADR-612 Finding of Non-Compliance Local Court Form ADR-614
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 84 of 200
Page 86¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Notice of Termination of Appointment of Discovery Facilitator Local Court Form ADR-615 Recommendations of Discovery Facilitator and Termination of Appointment of Discovery Facilitator Local Court Form ADR-616 Rejection of Assigned Discovery Facilitator Local Court Form ADR-617 Notice to Deponent and Deposition Officer of Assignment to Discovery Facilitator Program and Stay of Records Production Date Local Court Form ADR-618
(Rule 3.301 revised effective 1/1/25)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 85 of 200
Page 87¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Title Four. Criminal Rules
Division 1. Criminal
Chapter 1. Criminal Department
Rule 4.01. Electronic Recording in Misdemeanor and Infraction Cases Pursuant to Government Code section 69957, in misdemeanor and infraction proceedings, the court may, in its sole discretion, utilize electronic recording as a means of generating a verbatim record of proceedings. Court reporters are not ordinarily provided by the court in these cases. (Rule 4.01 new effective 1/1/24)
Rule 4.1. Motions (a) Motions procedures (1) Length
(A) A memorandum of points and authorities filed in support of or opposition to
a motion and produced on a computer must not exceed 4,200 words,
including footnotes. Such a memorandum must include a certificate by
submitting counsel or an unrepresented party stating the number of words
in the memorandum. The person certifying may rely on the word count of
the program used to prepare the memorandum.
(B) A memorandum of points and authorities must not exceed 15 pages.
(C) The limitations above do not include the caption of the case, the signature
block, the word count certification, or any exhibits.
(D) On application, a judge may authorize filing of a longer memorandum.
Except as otherwise ordered, any memorandum submitted in violation of
this rule will not be considered.
(2) Consequences for Failure to Comply with Motions rules
(A) The failure to comply with the rules governing motions may result in the
imposition of monetary sanctions.
(B) If any motion subject to this rule is not made or heard within the time limits
and pursuant to the requirements of this rule, failure to do so shall constitute
a waiver of the right to make the motion. The Court, for good cause shown,
may grant relief from the waiver.
(C) The failure to file any response within the time limits and pursuant to this
rule shall constitute a waiver of the right to make a response, but the Court,
for good cause shown, may grant relief from the waiver.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 86 of 200
Page 88¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(b) Pre-trial motions. (1) The following motions shall be filed and heard before trial:
(A) Demurrer to the complaint, indictment or information where the Court
authorizes filing after the entry of plea or where a demurrer is filed before
entry of plea;
(B) Motion to dismiss complaint, indictment or information (e.g. Penal Code
Section 995 or non-statutory motions to dismiss);
(C) Motion under Penal Code Section 1538.5 and other motions to suppress
evidence or for return of property unlawfully seized;
(D) Motion for discovery, including discovery relating to informants claimed to
be material witnesses;
(E) Motion to compel lineup;
(F) Motion to sever or consolidate cases, counts or defendants, if the parties
stipulate that the ruling shall be binding on the trial department;
(G) Any speedy trial motion where grounds exist at the time set herein for
notice;
(H) Motion to challenge the jury selection system;
(I) Motion to reinstate complaint;
(J) Motion to strike or attack the constitutional validity of prior convictions,
enhancements or probation;
(K) Motion to dismiss or for other relief for vindictive prosecution or outrageous
government conduct;
(L) Motion to recuse;
(M) Faretta motion;
(N) Motion to appoint advisory counsel;
(O) Motion to appoint second counsel in capital case;
(P) Motion to disclose surveillance action; and
(Q) Any other motion that does not require for its resolution a ruling on
admissibility of evidence at trial or is not otherwise a common law in limine
trial motion.
(c) Time and place for notice and hearing of pre-trial motions, and rules for filing and service.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 87 of 200
Page 89¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(1) Unless otherwise ordered, all motions and proofs of service shall be filed and
served in accordance with the time limitations set forth in California Rules of Court,
Rule 4.111 — and Penal Code Section 1538.5, and shall be set for hearing in the¶
Rule 4.111 and Penal Code Section 1538.5, and shall be set for hearing in the Criminal Department of the appropriate court.
(2) The Court, for good cause or upon the stipulation of the parties with court approval,
may permit motions to be heard at the time of trial.
(3) All pleadings filed in connection with pre-trial motions shall be filed in the
courthouse where the case is pending at the time the motion is filed. All pleadings
shall be served on opposing counsel in his or her regularly assigned office by the
most expeditious means available. If the identity of opposing counsel is not known
when the pleading is filed, the following service rules shall apply: (1) if the case is
being handled by a special unit, the pleading shall be served on the office of the
special unit assigned to the case; (2) in all other cases, the pleading shall be served
on the office of the opposing party closest to the courthouse in which the case is
pending.
(4) In felony cases, any party filing a pleading in connection with a substantive pre-
trial motion shall simultaneously serve the Court’s Research Attorneys in
accordance with the timeframes set forth in Rule 4.111(a) of the California Rules
of Court. Pleadings and exhibits in connection with felony motions shall be served
on the Research Attorneys by email at the following address:
ratts@contracosta.courts.ca.gov.
(5) If a felony motion is to be continued or dropped from calendar, counsel for the
moving party shall promptly notify the Court’s Research Attorneys by email and
the Research Attorneys will notify the Judge. If the party opposing a motion is
unable to file pleadings at least five (5) court days before the time scheduled for
the hearing as required by California Rules of Court, Rule 4.111, or as otherwise
required by law, counsel shall notify the Court’s Research Attorneys by email.
(6) All papers shall contain in the upper right-hand corner of the first page, the filing
party's estimate of the overall time required for the hearing of the matter, date and
department number of the hearing, and a request for a removal order if a defendant
or necessary witness is in custody outside the Contra Costa County Jail.
(d) General procedures for pre-trial motions: (1) A failure of the moving party to appear when the matter is called may, in the Court's discretion, cause the matter to be ordered off calendar. In the event of an unavoidable schedule conflict, the attorney with the conflict can avoid having the matter dropped by calling the Court and also notifying opposing counsel before the scheduled hearing and reporting the conflict.
(2) A motion that has been duly filed may be dropped from calendar up to forty-eight
(48) hours before the appearance date by notifying opposing counsel and the
Court. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the date set for hearing, the moving party
shall appear unless excused by the Court.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 88 of 200
Page 90¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(3) No matters will be continued, even by stipulation of the parties, except with the
approval of the Court for good cause shown. Compliance with Penal Code Section
1050 is required unless excused by the Court.
(4)(a) Motions and opposition to such motions shall specifically set forth any evidence,
theories of law and authorities relied on in support or opposition to said motions.
Checklist or “boilerplate” motions will not be considered and may, in the discretion
of the court, cause the matter to be dropped from the calendar.
(4)(b) In addition to the provisions of Rule 4.1(d)(4)(a) motions and oppositions to motions
to suppress evidence filed under Penal Code §1538.5 shall be governed by the
following additional procedural requirements:
1. The defendant must specify the precise grounds for suppression of the
evidence, including the identification both of the evidence for which
suppression is sought and of any and all acts and omissions by law
enforcement or others that are asserted to constitute a Fourth Amendment
violation, briefly but with sufficient precision to put the People on notice
regarding what they are called upon to prove and including any claimed
inadequacy for any justification for the search and seizure;
2. If the defendant’s motion alleges the lack of a warrant as the sole basis for
suppression, the People’s opposition shall specify the justification for the
warrantless search;
3. The defendant may then file a reply specifying the inadequacies of the
justification. Any such reply brief must be served (by email, facsimile or
personal service) at least two court days before the hearing;
4. The raising of new issues in the reply may constitute good cause for
continuance to permit the prosecution to prepare for the hearing; and
- Available sanctions for noncompliance with Rule 4.1(d)(4)(a) and (4)(b) include granting the prosecution or defendant a continuance or imposing a fine or contempt citation on counsel who do not comply.
(e) Motions to be heard by the trial judge. Except as otherwise ordered, motions not enumerated above as pre-trial motions shall be heard by the Trial Judge. Counsel in cases pre-assigned to a trial department shall submit to the Trial Judge all such motions within three (3) court days before the date is set for trial. (f) Ex parte applications (1) All ex parte applications for orders shortening or extending time shall be presented in the Criminal Department to which the motion has or will be assigned, with at least twenty-four (24) hours’ notice to the opposing party or counsel. Such applications shall include a written or oral supporting declaration, stating whether
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 89 of 200
Page 91¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
that party has been contacted and has agreed to the requested order or why the
ex parte order should be issued.
(2) Except by order of the Court, upon a showing of good cause, all ex parte
applications seeking to set a matter on shortened time shall provide for moving
papers to be filed and personally served at least five (5) calendar days and for
opposing papers to be filed and served at least two (2) calendar days before the
hearing date. All papers, including opposition and reply papers, filed in motions
brought on an order shortening time, shall be accompanied by a copy of the
proposed order.
(3) Any request for relief from operation of these rules shall be made to the Court, with
a showing of good cause, before the papers are filed.
(g) Motion to withdraw as counsel An attorney who is appointed or retained to represent a client in a criminal proceeding shall not withdraw from such representation except by filing a substitution of attorney bearing the written consent of the defendant or upon a timely motion and order of the court. (Rule 4.1 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 4.2. Discovery Any party asserting a work product or other privilege exception pursuant to Penal Code Section 1054.6 or asserting a discovery exception based upon a showing of good cause pursuant to Penal Code Section 1054.7 shall proceed by noticed motion which shall be heard before the first readiness conference. (Rule 4.2 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 4.3. Applications on Behalf of Inmates (a) Application to the Sheriff Except as otherwise stated in this rule, applications by or on behalf of inmates confined in the county jail, for temporary release from custody, for medical, family emergency, education, employment, and related purposes (i.e. requests for “passes”) shall be made to the Sheriff and not to the Court. (b) Application to the assigned direct calendar judge The following applications shall be made to the assigned direct calendar judge: those made pursuant to Sections 4011, 4011.6 and 4011.8 of the Penal Code. (c) The Court’s power to determine condition of confinement Nothing in this rule shall affect the Court's power and duty to make proper determinations and orders with respect to allegedly unlawful conditions of confinement in the county jail
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 90 of 200
Page 92¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
in a justiciable controversy properly before the Court in connection with a proper petition for writ of habeas corpus, application for modification of probation, or other similar pleading.
(Rule 4.3 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 4.4. Violations of Probation. (a) Notification by Probation Officer In all cases involving persons on probation, the Probation Officer shall promptly notify the Criminal Calendar Department responsible for monitoring that probationer of every violation of law (other than minor traffic offenses) that the Probation Officer reasonably believes the probationer has committed. (b) Where probation violations are heard Probation violation hearings in felony cases shall be held in the Criminal Department that presides over the felony probation calendar. Probation violation hearings in misdemeanor cases that originally arose in the Richmond and Pittsburg Branch Courts shall be held in the branch court in which the underlying case arose, in a department designated by that branch court’s Supervising Judge. (Rule 4.4 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 4.5. Reserved [REPEALED 1/1/18]
Rule 4.6 — Relief from Forfeiture of Bail in Misdemeanor and Felony Cases.¶
Rule 4.6. Relief from Forfeiture of Bail in Misdemeanor and Felony Cases. (a) Bench warrants upon forfeiture of bail (1) When a bailed defendant fails to appear, unless personal appearance has been excused under Penal Code Section 977, or unless the Court grants a continuance under Penal Code Section 1305.1, bail shall immediately be forfeited and a bench warrant shall be issued. The bench warrant shall require bail in an amount not less than the amount of the forfeited bond, and not less than the minimum amount required for entry into automated warrant index systems. Each warrant shall contain a notice to the following effect: “Do Not Cite Release -- Bail in Forfeiture.”
(2) If counsel appears for a bailed defendant whose personal appearance is desired
by the Court, and asserts that the defendant’s personal appearance is excused
under Penal Code Section 977, the Court shall order the defendant to personally
appear at a specific date, time and place, pursuant to Penal Code Section
978.5(a)(1). If the defendant does not then appear, bail forfeiture and bench
warrant shall be ordered.
(3) If counsel or the defendant provides the Court with sufficient grounds for a finding
that the non-appearance may be excused under Penal Code Section 1305.1, the
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 91 of 200
Page 93¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Court shall enter in the record any such finding and may order a reasonable continuance without immediate forfeiture of bail.
(b) Setting aside forfeiture upon appearance of defendant (1) An order of bail forfeiture shall be vacated on the Court‘s motion if the defendant personally appears before the end of the 180-day period defined in Penal Code Section 1305. Appearance may be by means of arrest on the bench warrant, “voluntary” or “add-on” appearance, surrender by the bail agent, or other means (e.g., a dismissal of the case).
(2) If the defendant appears on a new or separate matter and the defendant or bail
agent advised the Court of the forfeited bond, the Court may, in its discretion,
address the bail forfeiture issue on the case in which a bench warrant remains
outstanding. The Court does not assume responsibility for identifying a defendant’s
pending cases involving forfeiture or initiating service of warrants.
(3) Relief from bail forfeiture without the personal appearance of the defendant will be
considered only upon a timely written motion by the bail agent or surety, stating
the specific grounds upon which relief is sought, with not less than ten (10)
calendar days’ notice to both the District Attorney and the County Counsel. A
motion for exoneration of forfeited bail will be treated as a motion for a tolling of
the 180-day period if the grounds asserted are those of temporary disability, as
described in Penal Code Section 1305(e). Repetitive, groundless or otherwise
frivolous motions may result in the imposition of sanctions.
(4) When the People request dismissal of a case in which bail is in forfeiture, the Court
may, on its own motion, waive the defendant’s personal appearance and may
order forfeiture relief and bail exoneration.
(c) Reinstatement and continuance of bail After Notice of Forfeiture has been mailed by the clerk, a defendant may be continued on a reinstated bond only with the consent of the bail agent. Consent to reinstatement and continuation of a forfeited bond may be given through personal appearance by the bail agent or in writing, or to a member of the court’s staff by telephone. The Clerk’s Minute Order shall identify the person giving consent to continuation of the bond, and the method of communicating it. (d) Exoneration of bail after forfeiture When an order of bail forfeiture has been vacated on a bond that is not to be continued, the Court may, on its own motion and in its discretion, order bail exoneration without the necessity of a motion or appearance by the bail agent. (Rule 4.6 revised effective 1/1/18)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 92 of 200
Page 94¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 4.7. Submitting Sensitive Exhibits All controlled substances, guns, money, valuables, and other sensitive exhibits shall be packaged and stored separately from other exhibits. Sharp objects such as knives, needles and glass shall be specially wrapped and labeled for the handler’s protection. (For instance, a syringe shall be packaged by the police agency in a plastic tube.) Any party submitting such items, and anyone arranging transfer of such items, shall notify the exhibits clerk or the courtroom clerk of these objects and about any dangers associated with them. (Rule 4.7 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 4.8. Withdrawal of Time Waivers in Misdemeanor Cases
A misdemeanor defendant who wishes to withdraw a previous general time waiver must give “proper notice” to the district attorney as required by Penal Code section 1382(a)(3)(A). Such proper notice shall be in writing, addressed and delivered in a manner reasonably calculated to come to the immediate attention of a prosecutor with responsibility for the case, and be given enough in advance to permit the district attorney to ascertain witness availability and the court to set an appropriate trial date accordingly. Two days’ notice shall constitute proper notice. A judge may determine, however, based on the facts of the case, that a lesser time constitutes proper notice.
(Rule 4.8 new effective 1/1/20)
Chapter 2. Felony Direct Calendaring
Rule 4.10. Direct Calendaring in Felony Matters
Effective January 1, 2021, all felony matters will be subject to the direct calendaring system set forth in this Chapter.
(Rule 4.10 new effective 1/1/21)
Rule 4.11. Arraignments; Assignment for All Purposes
Pre-preliminary hearing arraignments for all in-custody defendants charged in felony matters will occur in the Martinez arraignment department. Out of custody felony arraignments will occur in the location where the case is venued. All felony matters shall be directly assigned to a criminal department judge for all purposes at the time of arraignment. The Presiding Judge may delegate to the judicial officer conducting arraignments the authority to make the assignment as determined by the assignment criteria, including consideration of court resources, or the direction of the Presiding Judge. The assigned judge will oversee the case for purposes through and including trial as resources permit pursuant to Rule 4.12.
(Rule 4.11 revised 1/1/24)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 93 of 200
Page 95¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 4.12. Reassignment by Presiding Judge
Nothing in these rules shall be interpreted to prohibit the Presiding Judge, or Assistant Presiding Judge or Supervising Criminal Judge if so designated by the Presiding Judge, to reassign direct-calendared felony cases as permitted by the Rules of Court.
(Rule 4.12 new effective 1/1/24)
Division 2. Infractions
Chapter 1. Infraction Rules
Rule 4.40. Filing The Clerk's Office of the Contra Costa County Superior Court, Traffic Division shall be responsible for processing all adult and juvenile traffic infractions and non-traffic infractions. No misdemeanors shall be filed in the Traffic Division in the Pittsburg, Richmond, and Walnut Creek Courthouses. (Rule 4.40 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 4.41. Court Sessions Regular court sessions for citations and complaints filed in the Traffic Division for both adult and juvenile matters shall be scheduled as required by the Presiding Judge and published by the Court Executive Officer. (Rule 4.41 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 4.42. Arraignments; Remote Appearance for Arraignments Except for offenses mandating a court appearance, a defendant may waive his/her right to be arraigned on the violation and enter a plea of not guilty at the court counter. The Clerk will only assign a trial date if the defendant waives their right to a speedy trial, on the form provided by the Clerk. If the defendant requests a trial date within the statutory time requirements of Penal Code §1382, the defendant must be arraigned in open court.
A defendant may request to appear remotely for an arraignment and/or trial. A defendant who requests to appear remotely for an arraignment and trial must fill out Local Court Form TR-128 and submit it to the court in person at least five (5) court days before the due date. If only a request to appear remotely for arraignment was filed, any subsequent request to appear remotely for trial shall be submitted on Local Court Form TR-128 at least five (5) court day before the trial date. (Rule 4.42 revised effective 1/1/24)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 94 of 200
Page 96¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 4.43. Demurrers All demurrers shall be made in writing and filed in accordance with the time limitations set forth in California Rules of Court, Rule 4.111. Demurrers shall be heard at the time of the arraignment prior to the entry of a plea. (Rule 4.43 new effective 1/1/24)
Rule 4.44. Withdrawal of Time Waivers in Infraction Cases A defendant in an infraction matter who wishes to withdraw a previous general time waiver, must give “proper notice” to the district attorney as required by Penal Code section 1382(a)(3)(A). The defendant shall also give notice to the citing officer. Such notice shall be in writing, addressed and delivered in a manner reasonably calculated to come to the immediate attention of the district attorney and the citing officer to permit the officer enough notice to ascertain availability and the court to set a trial date accordingly. Two days’ notice shall constitute proper notice. A judge may determine, however, based on the facts of the case, that lesser times constitute proper notice. (Rule 4.44 new effective 1/1/24)
Rule 4.45. Continuances Except for continuance of a trial date, on or before the date set or required in any matter, the Clerk shall have the authority to grant the defendant one extension of not more than thirty (30) calendar days. (Rule 4.45 renumbered effective 1/1/24)
Rule 4.46. Juvenile Traffic Infraction Matters All juvenile traffic citation matters will be required for a mandatory appearance pursuant to Penal Code §§ 853.6 and 853.6(a). These citations will not be subject to civil assessment pursuant to Penal Code § 1214.1. (Rule 4.47 renumbered effective 1/1/24)
Chapter 2. Adjudication of Infraction Matters
Rule 4.60. Trial by Declaration for Traffic Infractions (a) Trial by Declaration in traffic infractions The Court adopts the trial by declaration process defined in Vehicle Code § 40902. (b) Failure to appear or untimely request for action Pursuant to Vehicle Code § 40903, any person who fails to appear as provided by law may be deemed to have elected to have a trial by written declaration upon any alleged infraction, as charged by the citing officer, involving a violation of the Vehicle Code or any
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 95 of 200
Page 97¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
local ordinance adopted pursuant to the vehicle code. If there is no timely request for action and the fines and fees are not paid by the due date, the case may proceed to civil assessment pursuant to Penal Code § 1214.1.
(c) Adjudication pursuant to CVC 40500 In eligible cases the Court will conduct the trial by declaration and it will be adjudicated on the basis of the notice to appear issued pursuant to Vehicle Code § 40500. (d) Disposition with guilty finding or untimely request for a trial de novo If there is a guilty finding, the conviction shall be reported to the DMV and the defendant notified of the disposition of the case, the amount of imposed fines and fees, and the defendant’s right to request a trial de novo within a specified period of time. If there is no timely request for a trial de novo and the fines and fees are not paid by the due date, the case may proceed to civil assessment pursuant to Penal Code § 1214.1. (Rule 4.60 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 4.61 — Clerks’ Authority in Infraction Cases.¶
Rule 4.61. Clerks’ Authority in Infraction Cases. For cases that have not been transferred to court collections, deputy clerks are granted the authority to take the following actions at the request of defendants charged with infraction violations:
(1) Accept not guilty plea and schedule court trial (also see Local Court Rule 4.80, below).
(2) Accept the posting and forfeiting of bail on infraction cases.
(3) Set trial de novo (must post full bail with cash or certified funds only).
(4) Accept cash, check, credit payment, certified fund if case is in court control.
(5) Schedule same day arraignment calendar.
(6) Accept proof of correction for correctable violations with a $25 proof fee.
(7) Give one time 30-day traffic school extension.
(8) Give one time 30-day first appearance extension.
(9) Issue subpoenas for cases that have a court trial set. (Rule 4.61 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 4.62. Prohibited Requests in Traffic Matters The Court will not grant or authorize deputy clerks to grant any of the following requests from defendants or their counsel:
(1) For the scheduling of a court arraignment or trial after the finding defined in Vehicle Code § 40902.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 96 of 200
Page 98¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(2) Remand to county jail in lieu of payment of bail or fines and fees.
(3) To grant subsequent extension, following an initial 30-day extension, of time to pay or to provide proof of completion of community service work or traffic violator school or to provide proof of correction of correctable offense(s).
(4) To grant out-of-state community service work. (Rule 4.62 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 4.63 Request for Ability to Pay Consideration and Civil Assessment Waiver (a) Petition to Reduce or Vacate Civil Assessment Defendants seeking to reduce or vacate a civil assessment must submit a written petition to the court requesting such relief. Defendants may use Form TR-320 for this purpose.
The petition must be filed in person or by mail to the court location listed on the traffic citation. The petition must include the relevant facts and circumstances leading to the defendant’s failure to appear or pay. Supporting documentation should also be included with the petition.
A judicial officer will review the petition and make a determination as to whether there was good cause for the failure to pay and/or appear. Upon making a determination of good cause, the judicial officer may reduce or vacate the civil assessment. A written copy of the determination will be provided to the defendant.
A petition to reduce or vacate the civil assessment does not stay any order requiring payment of bail, fines, penalties, fees, or assessments unless specifically ordered by the Court.
(b) Ability-to-Pay Determination A defendant in a traffic infraction matter may ask the court for an ability-to-pay determination at adjudication or any time while the assessed fines remain unpaid. Whether or not making the request at time of adjudication, the defendant will be instructed to complete Form TR-320.
If an ability-to-pay petition is granted, the court may order the defendant to:
(1) Make installment payments; and/or
(2) Complete community service to satisfy some or all of the assessed fines and fees.
The Court shall consider the burden of community service.
A written copy of the determination will be provided to the petitioner.
(Rule 4.63 revised effective 1/1/24)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 97 of 200
Page 99¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 4.64. Appeals (a) The process for filing an appeal in an Infraction case An appeal is taken by filing with the Clerk in the Traffic Division a written notice of appeal signed by appellant or appellant's attorney. The notice shall be filed within the timeframes provided in Rule 8.902 of the California Rules of Court. Any Notice filed after the expiration of the time prescribed shall be marked by the Clerk "received (date) but not filed," and the Clerk shall advise the filing party that it was not filed because it was late. (b) The record on appeal for Infraction cases The Appellate Division elects to authorize the use of the original court file in lieu of a clerk’s transcript as the record on appeal, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rules 8.910(a)(1)(B) and 8.914.
(c) Authorization to use official electronic recording where available in Infraction cases The Appellate Division elects to authorize the use of an official electronic recording, where available, as the record of the oral proceeding instead of obtaining a corrected statement on appeal from the judicial officer who presided over the proceeding before the Appellate Division, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 8.916(d)(6)(A). (Rule 4.64 revised effective 1/1/24)
Chapter 3. Collections Program for Traffic Infraction Cases
Rule 4.80. Court Collections Program (a) Collection of Payment Plans The Defendant may submit Local Court Form TR-123 Written Plea Form and Request for Monthly Payments to plead guilty or no contest to the citation and request a payment plan before the due date on the reminder notice. If the defendant would like to request a payment plan after conviction of the infraction charge(s), the defendant may submit Local Court Form TR-126 Request for Payment Plan. If the TR-123 or TR-126 form is approved, the defendant will be referred to the court’s selected third-party collection agency to schedule a payment plan. If the defendant fails to make minimum monthly payments timely, the case may become delinquent, and the court’s third-party collection agency may take enhanced collections efforts on the case as identified in rule 4.80(b) below. (b) Collection efforts for delinquent cases If the defendant fails to pay Court-ordered fines, fees, penalty assessments and surcharges, the Court will deem the case delinquent. Upon such determination, the Court will refer the case to the Court’s selected third-party collection agency for enhanced collection efforts. The Court and the third-party collection agency may utilize all available
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 98 of 200
Page 100¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
collection methods to resolve these unpaid debts, including skip tracing, referral to the Franchise Tax Board Court-Ordered Debt Program for possible wage garnishment, and levy of personal property, and referral to the Franchise Tax Board Interagency Intercept Program for intercept of state tax refunds, unclaimed property, or lottery winnings.
(Rule 4.80 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 4.81. Application of Overpayment Whenever the Court receives an overpayment for an infraction case and the Court determines that the defendant is delinquent on another felony, misdemeanor or infraction case, the Court will apply the overpayment to that case. (Rule 4.81 revised effective 1/1/15)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 99 of 200
Page 101¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Title Five. Family and Juvenile Rules Division 1. Family Law Matters
Chapter 1. Family Law Department
Rule 5.0. Application of Rules and Definitions (a) Application of Rules These rules apply in all departments of the Contra Costa Superior Court hearing family law matters (Family Law Division). They shall be read and applied in conjunction with the applicable law, including federal and state statutes and the California Rules of Court. (b) Definitions (1) California Rules of Court may be referred to as “CRC’s.”
(2) Local Rules shall be referred to as “Local Rule.”
(3) Department of Child Support Services shall be referred to as “DCSS.”
(4) Family Court Services shall be referred to as “FCS.”
(5) Income and Expense Declaration (Judicial Council Form FL-150) may be referred
to as “I&E.”
(c) Self-represented litigants Attorneys and self-represented litigants (also known as pro per litigants) shall comply with all applicable statutes in addition to these local family law rules and the California Rules of Court.
Self-represented litigants shall be treated in the same manner as if represented by counsel and shall be held to the same standards. All references to counsel in these rules apply equally to self-represented litigants.
(Rule 5.0 revised effective 1/1/23)
Rule 5.1. Assignment of Departments and Matters (a) Matters Assigned to Family Law Division The following matters shall be heard in the Family Law Division:
(1) Unless otherwise assigned by the Presiding Judge, all matters filed under
the Family Code except those actions filed under:
i. Family Code Division 11;
ii. Family Code Division 12, Parts 4, 5, and 6; and
iii. Family Code Division 13.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 100 of 200
Page 102¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(2) All other matters assigned by the Presiding Judge.
(3) All other matters which are properly brought before a Family Law bench
officer pursuant to an order of the Court.
(Rule 5.1(a) revised effective 1/1/23)
(b) Assignment of departments (1) The Court designates four or more full-time departments and additional part-time departments (as resources allow) to serve as the Family Law Division of the Court. The Presiding Judge shall assign judicial officers to the Family Law Division and designate one of the judicial officers as the Supervising Judge of the division.
(2) One of the designated departments will operate under the authority of AB 1058
(Stat. 1996, ch. 957). This department will hear all issues described in Family Code
Section 17400, whether or not the action was initially filed by the Department of
Child Support Services (DCSS). Absent stipulation or other court order providing
that this department will also hear any other issues arising in such case (whether
or not filed by DCSS), such other issues shall be heard in the department to which
such action would be assigned if DCSS were not involved in the case.
(3) The remaining departments will hear all matters filed pursuant to the California
Family Code under a direct calendar system. Cases will be assigned to
departments, utilizing a plan of assignment which the Supervising Judge of the
Family Law Division devises from time to time. These case assignments are
deemed “all-purpose” assignments under Code of Civil Procedure Section
170.6(a)(2).
All matters shall be initially calendared in the appropriate department based on the
“all purpose” assignment. Except in the case of a matter that has shortened time,
the initial hearing date shall be assigned by the Clerk’s Office at the time the matter
is filed.
(4) When there is more than one case filed with respect to a given family, the bench
officer hearing a matter in one of those cases may order the cases consolidated
or coordinated.
(5) Applications for Temporary Restraining Orders and for Restraining Orders After
Hearing filed pursuant to the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (Family Code
Division 10) may be heard in departments located in designated branch courts.
Applications for Temporary Restraining Orders and for Restraining Orders After
Hearing shall be filed as set forth in Local Rule 5.2.
(6) All “Custody Order-Juvenile-Final Judgment-Visitation Order-Juvenile” (Judicial
Council Form JV-200/JV-205) containing custody and visitation orders, shall be
filed in existing family law cases or, if no case exists, a new file will be opened. If
a new file is opened and either parent files a Request for Order to modify custody
or visitation, the initial moving party shall be designated the Petitioner and the
responding party shall be designated the Respondent. If the “Custody Order-
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 101 of 200
Page 103¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Juvenile-Final Judgment/Visitation Order-Juvenile” of the Juvenile Court contains an order described in Local Rule 5.65(c), then any Request for Order to modify custody or visitation filed within one year of the Juvenile Court’s “Custody Order - Juvenile-Final Judgment/Visitation Order-Juvenile” shall be heard as provided in
Rule 5 — 65(c).¶
Local Rule 5.65(c). (Rule 5.1(b) revised effective 1/1/23) (c) Collaborative law (1) Collaborative Law Defined
(A) The Court recognizes the unique nature of family law disputes and the fact
that family law issues are best resolved by the parties reaching an
agreement or agreements over critical matters including child custody,
support and property, without engaging in the traditional adversarial
litigation process. The Contra Costa County Superior Court strongly
supports the use of the collaborative law process as well as other alternate
dispute resolution tools for the purpose of developing both short-term and
long-term agreements that meet the best interests of the entire family,
particularly the children.
(2) Standards of Collaborative Law Cases
(A) No case will be entitled to a designation as a “collaborative law” case unless
the parties have signed and filed a collaborative law stipulation.
(B) When a case is designated as a “collaborative law” case, the Court shall
vacate all matters previously set on the Court’s calendar and shall set the
matter for a Case Management Conference no later than one year from the
date of the designation.
(C) The term “Collaborative Law Case” is to be included in the caption of any
document filed with the Court from and after the filing of the collaborative
law stipulation and order.
(D) As to any case designated as a collaborative law case:
(i) The Court will consider collaborative law counsel to be advisory and
not attorneys of record.
(ii) The Court will not impose discovery deadlines or enter scheduling
orders.
(E) The designation of a case as a collaborative law case is voluntary and
requires the agreement of all parties. The collaborative law case
designation will be removed by stipulation or upon the filing and service of
a termination election as provided in the collaborative law stipulation and
order. The filing by any party of a Request for Case Management, Request
for Order, or other pleading requiring judicial adjudication shall
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 102 of 200
Page 104¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
automatically terminate the collaborative law case designation and a Case
Management Conference will be set.
(Rule 5.1(c)(2)(E) revised effective 1/1/17)
(F) Collaborative law cases are governed by the Family Code, the California
Rules of Court and other applicable California law.
(d) Privately Compensated Temporary Judges (1) Appointment. A “temporary judge” is an attorney appointed by the court upon stipulation of the parties to decide the case under Article IV, Section 21 of the California Constitution and in accordance with the California Rules of Court, rules 2.400 and 2.830 through 2.835. Parties must submit the stipulation and proposed order for appointment of a privately compensated temporary judge to the court. (2) Filing of Papers and Orders/Scheduling of Proceedings. A party must file all original papers with the Clerk of the Court and all applicable fees must be paid within the same time and in the same manner as would be required if the court were trying the case. The party must provide a copy of all filed documents to the temporary judge. The scheduling of hearings before the temporary judge shall be arranged by the parties directly with the temporary judge. Signed orders of the temporary judge shall be filed with the court. (3) Termination of Appointment. The temporary judge shall remain appointed until final determination of the case unless otherwise ordered by the court. Upon completion of the appointment, the temporary judge shall sign and submit a Notice of Termination of Privately Compensated Temporary Judge Appointment with the court. (Rule 5.1(d) new effective 7/1/25)
(Rule 5.1 revised effective 7/1/25)
Rule 5.2. Obtaining Temporary Restraining Orders /Ex Parte Orders (a) Application Requests for Temporary Restraining Orders, Ex Parte Orders, and Emergency Orders shall be presented to the Family Law Legal Technician’s Unit. The Legal Technician’s Unit will assign the matter based on a plan of assignment as determined by the Supervising Judge of the Family Law Division.
With the exception of applications for restraining orders filed under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (DVPA), all applications must be submitted with the appropriate fee or fee waiver, and the original and two (2) copies of the application. The Court will file all
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 103 of 200
Page 105¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
applications submitted (including applications pertaining to domestic violence) whether or not temporary orders are issued.
Applications for a Domestic Violence Restraining Order and Responses to an Application for a Domestic Violence Restraining Order may be submitted either in person, by drop box, by mail, or through the court’s e-file portal. Refer to the Court’s Restraining Order webpage [https://www.cc-courts.org/restraining-orders/restraining-orders.aspx] for more information. (Rule 5.2(a) revised effective 7/1/25)
(b) Notice Except as provided in Family Code Section 6300, unless notice of the application for an ex parte order (including an application for an order shortening time) or a Temporary Restraining Order would result in great or irreparable injury to the applicant before the matter can be heard on notice, the applicant shall give the other party the notice required by law. (Rule 5.2(b) revised effective 1/1/18) (c) Requirements Applications for ex parte orders shall comply with California Rules of Court (Family Law Rules). (Rule 5.2(c) revised effective 1/1/23)
(d) Minor applicants If the applicant for Temporary Restraining Orders is a minor under 12 years of age, an application for appointment of Guardian Ad Litem and order appointing a Guardian Ad Litem shall accompany the application. (Rule 5.2(d) revised effective 1/1/14) (Rule 5.2 revised effective 7/1/25)
Rule 5.3. Orders Shortening Time (OST) All applications for Orders Shortening Time (OST) for service or for hearing shall be presented as ex parte applications to the Family Law Legal Technician’s Unit. The Legal Technician’s Unit will assign the matter based on a plan of assignment as determined by the Supervising Judge of the Family Law Division.
All ex parte applications for an OST shall be submitted in compliance with the application and notice requirements for ex parte applications as set forth in Local Court Rule 5.2. Before submitting an application for an OST, the applicant shall contact the opposing counsel or party and request a list of dates counsel or party is unavailable and include that information with the applicant’s own unavailability on the declaration of notice.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 104 of 200
Page 106¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(Rule 5.3 revised effective 1/1/18)
Rule 5.4. Hearings (a) Duty to meet and confer Except in cases involving domestic violence, and consistent with the California Rules of Court, BEFORE the date of the hearing relating to a Request for Order (Judicial Council Form FL-300), parties shall meet to discuss all issues raised and make a good faith attempt to settle all issues and exchange all relevant documents and information that will be presented at the hearing. (Rule 5.4(a) revised effective 1/1/18) (b) Initial hearing When an initial hearing is set pursuant to a Request for Order or other pleading seeking relief, the initial hearing shall be set on the assigned judicial officer’s short cause calendar. The clerk shall provide the date and time for all initial hearings. All matters set on a short cause calendar are limited to 20 minutes of hearing time. (Rule 5.4(b) revised effective 1/1/17) (c) Transfer of a matter in which a hearing will exceed 20 minutes If, at any time after a Request for Order is filed, the Court determines that the hearing in the matter will exceed 20 minutes in length, the matter may be continued to another court date that is designed to accommodate long-cause hearings, trials and settlement conferences. (Rule 5.4(c) revised effective 1/1/18)
(d) Substitution of Counsel Counsel shall not appear on behalf of a party unless counsel has filed a Substitution of Attorney (Form MC-050) or a Notice of Limited Scope Representation (Form FL-950) before the hearing. (Rule 5.4(d) revised effective 1/1/23) (e) Continuances (1) All requests for continuances shall be in writing, except as may be authorized by the bench officer hearing the case.
(2) Each written request for a continuance shall be accompanied by payment of the
applicable fee or a fee waiver.
(Rule 5.4(e)(2) renumbered effective 1/1/18)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 105 of 200
Page 107¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(3) A request for a continuance shall be made by ex parte application, written
agreement or by stipulation and shall not be granted unless specifically authorized
by the judicial officer to whom the case is assigned or (in that bench officer’s
absence) by the Supervising Judge. Any such stipulation or written agreement
shall be signed by counsel for both sides or, if either side is unrepresented, by that
party. Any request, written agreement or stipulation to continue shall contain facts
showing good cause for the continuance.
(Rule 5.4(e)(3) revised and renumbered effective 1/1/18)
(f) Pleadings (1) Unless the Court has granted prior leave for a different form or page limit, all pleadings in family law matters shall be in the form, and comply with the page limits, prescribed in the California Rules of Court and these Local Rules. Any optional Memorandum of Points and Authorities shall not exceed 15 pages. The Court may refuse to consider any pleading that does not comply with the form and page limits. (Rule 5.4(f)(1) revised and renumbered effective 1/1/18)
(2) A fully completed, current Income and Expense Declaration (I&E) (or Simplified
Financial Statement, when appropriate) shall be filed and served with moving and
responsive papers in all hearings involving requests for support, attorney’s fees,
costs, or other financial relief, unless the party has filed an I&E within 90 calendar
days of the date of the hearing and there have been no significant changes in the
party’s income, assets or expenses.
(Rule 5.4(f)(2) revised effective 1/1/23)
(3) On a Request for Order to modify a prior order, the moving party shall attach a
copy of the prior order to the moving papers.
(Rule 5.4(f)(3) renumbered effective 1/1/18)
(4) Unless the Court has granted prior leave for different service time or method, all
moving and responsive pleadings shall be timely filed and served in compliance
with the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 1005 or any other applicable
provision of law. The Court may not consider any moving or responsive pleading
that was not timely filed and served.
(Rule 5.4(f)(4) renumbered and revised effective 1/1/18)
(5) Pursuant to Family Code section 217, a party seeking to present live testimony
from all witnesses other than the parties shall file and serve all parties with their
witness list with a brief description of the anticipated testimony. This list shall be
filed and served no less than 14 calendar days before hearing.
(Rule 5.4(f)(5) revised effective 1/1/23)
(6) Evidentiary attachments submitted in support of a Request for Order or in response
to a Request for Order shall not exceed 10 pages in length without prior leave of
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 106 of 200
Page 108¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Court. The 10-page limit shall not include declarations under CRC 5.111 (a) or
prior orders as required by Local Rule 5.4 (f) (3), or as necessary to support orders
to show cause for contempt or applications for wage assignments or to determine
arrears. Any request for leave to exceed this page limit shall state reasons why
the additional attachments are relevant and necessary.
(Rule 5.4(f)(6) new effective 1/1/23)
(7) Whether filed electronically or otherwise, it is the responsibility of the filing party
to identify any documents that are considered confidential. Confidential records,
including but not limited to medical, psychological, or educational reports
concerning a minor child, or reports from Children and Family Services or Family
Court Services, must be marked confidential when submitting for filing.
(Rule 5.4(f)(7) revised effective 7/1/23)
(g) Motions to be relieved as counsel Motions to be relieved as counsel shall be made in conformity with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362 using Judicial Council Forms MC-051, MC-052 and MC-053. (Rule 5.4(g) renumbered and revised effective 1/1/18) (h) Interpreter services The Court provides interpreters to help non-English speaking parties in family law court proceedings. The Court’s website explains the procedures for requesting a Court Interpreter at www.cc-courts.org/interpreter and parties may also seek assistance from a Clerk of the Court. A hearing may be delayed or continued to a different date if an interpreter was not requested sufficiently in advance of the hearing and/or no interpreter is available at the time of the hearing. (Rule 5.4(h) renumbered and revised effective 1/1/18) (i) Double Pro Per Hearing Days Each department in the Family Law Division, with the exception of the department designated as the “AB 1058” Department, shall be assigned a “Double Pro Per” short - cause calendar to occur on the same morning each week. Hearings on a Double Pro Per day are reserved for matters where both parties are self-represented. The Court shall post each department’s designated Double Pro Per day on the court’s website and shall notify the Family Law Section of the Contra Costa County Bar Association of each department’s Double Pro Per day no less than once per year.
Except for requests for Domestic Violence Restraining Orders and Orders Shortening Time, hearings where one or both parties are represented by counsel shall not be heard on a department’s Double Pro Per day, but shall be continued to the next available non- Double Pro Per calendar date. If counsel enters a case after a hearing is set on a Double Pro Per day or otherwise finds their matter is set on Double Pro Per day, counsel shall contact the department clerk to obtain a continuance before the scheduled hearing date.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 107 of 200
Page 109¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
There will be no fee charged to continue a hearing from a Double Pro Per day to a non- Double Pro Per day. (Rule 5.4(i) new effective 1/1/19)
(j) Assignment of Hearing Dates With the exception of motions brought pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128.7, all other motion hearing dates will be assigned by the Clerk’s Office at the time the motion is filed unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Dates cannot be reserved or given over the telephone. (Rule 5.4(j) new effective 1/1/19) (k) Review Hearings If any party wishes to update the Court for a review hearing, any such update shall be filed and served at least 2 weeks prior to the review hearing unless the Court specifies a different deadline. Any update shall not to exceed five pages in length.
If financial matters are at issue and there have been any significant changes since the last
I&E was filed, or if more than 3 months will have passed between the filing of the last I&E and the review hearing date, each party shall file and serve an updated I&E and include the required attachments that demonstrate the party’s income. (Rule 5.4(k) new effective 1/1/23)
(l) Proof of Service Unless the Court has granted an order shortening time, proof of service of the moving papers shall be filed no later than 5 court days before the hearing. (CRC 5.94 (b).) If a responding party fails to appear at a hearing and the moving party has not filed proof of timely service, the matter will be taken off calendar or continued to another date to allow for timely service or filing of the proof of service. If a hearing is continued, the moving party shall file proof of timely service of both the moving papers and notice of the continued hearing date. (Rule 5.4(l) new effective 1/1/23) (m) Removing Matter from Calendar Any stipulation to vacate or continue a hearing shall be filed with the Court, with a courtesy copy provided to the department hearing the matter, at least 3 days before the hearing. (Rule 5.4(m) new effective 1/1/23)
(Rule 5.4 revised effective 1/1/23)
Rule 5.5. Procedures to Complete Dissolution/Legal Separation (a) Default or uncontested proceeding
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 108 of 200
Page 110¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Parties shall follow the checklist set forth by the Judicial Council in the Judgment Checklist – Dissolution/Legal Separation (Judicial Council Form FL-182) to complete the steps and pleadings necessary to submit a judgment. (Rule 5.5(a) revised effective 1/1/18)
(b) Contested proceeding After a response has been filed and both parties have served their Preliminary Declarations of Disclosure and filed a Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure (Judicial Council Form FL-141), either party may file and serve a Request for Case Management Conference (Local Court Form FamLaw-112) with the Court to set the matter for a Case Management Conference. The Request for Case Management Conference will not be accepted for filing until all parties have served their Preliminary Declarations of Disclosure and filed Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure, or obtained a court order waiving this requirement per Family Code Section 2107. The Court may also set a Case Management Conference at its own discretion. (Rule 5.5(b) revised effective 1/1/18) (c) Self-represented parties Self-represented parties who need assistance in determining the next steps in their cases, including getting custody orders, support orders, finishing their divorce or other some other action, may speak with the Family Law Facilitator’s Office during self-help desk or drop-in hours. Refer to the Family Law Facilitator’s webpage [https://www.cc- courts.org/family/flf.aspx] for more information and to access LiveChat. (Rule 5.5(c) revised effective 1/1/23) (Rule 5.5 revised effective 1/1/18)
Rule 5.6. Case Management Conference / Family Centered Case Resolution Conference (FCCRC) (a) Case Management Conference statement No less than 7 calendar days before the date set for the Case Management Conference (CMC) each party shall file and serve a Case Management Conference Statement (Local Court Form FamLaw-113). (Rule 5.6(a) revised effective 1/1/23) (b) Attendance at conference Parties shall be present at the Case Management Conference or Family Centered Case Resolution Conference (FCCRC) unless represented by counsel, in which case, counsel shall appear. Appearance may be in person or remote if timely arranged. The parties or the attorneys shall be fully prepared to discuss identification of disputed issues, the timetable for disposition of the case by settlement or trial, and be sufficiently familiar with the facts of the case so that the Court may make necessary orders.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 109 of 200
Page 111¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(Rule 5.6(b) revised effective 1/1/23)
(c) Orders at Case Management Conference/FCCRC The parties shall address, if applicable, and the Court may take appropriate action with respect to the following: (1) Whether any matters (e.g., the bankruptcy of a party, pending criminal matters impacting issues in the case, a pending juvenile action concerning a child, or custody orders from another jurisdiction) affect the Court’s jurisdiction or processing of the case. (2) Whether discovery has been completed and, if not, the date by which it will be completed. (3) What discovery issues are anticipated. (4) Whether an issue in the case should be bifurcated or a hearing should be set for a motion to bifurcate. (5) A date or dates by which Final Declarations of Disclosure are to be exchanged and the Declaration of Service of Declaration of Disclosure and Income and Expense Declarations filed. (6) Whether to refer the parties to Family Court Services (FCS) in cases in which custody or visitation (or both) is at issue and no evaluation or private mediation is pending. (7) The need for selection and compensation of joint experts by stipulation or motion. (8) The need for selection and compensation of a Special Master by stipulation or appointment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 638 and 639. (9) The need for an order for attorney fees and costs by stipulation or motion. (10) A date for Mandatory Settlement Conference (MSC). (11) Whether to set a Recommendation Conference in cases involving child custody and visitation in cases that have a child custody evaluation pending. (12) If a trial date has not been previously set, the date by which the case will be ready for trial. Each side shall have available at the conference all necessary information as to unavailable dates as to the parties, their attorneys, and any retained experts. (13) The estimated length of trial. (14) Setting a trial date. (15) Any other matters that should be considered by the Court or addressed in its case management order. (16) Whether to set a further Case Management Conference.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 110 of 200
Page 112¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(17) Whether to tailor or modify the requirements of Local Rule 5.7(b) as it relates to
the case.
(18) The stipulation of the parties and consent of the Court to place the matter in further
case management pursuant to Family Code sections 2450 and 2451.
(Rule 5.6(c) revised effective 1/1/18)
(Rule 5.6 revised effective 1/1/18)
Rule 5.7. Mandatory Settlement Conference (a) Calendaring and attendance The Court may require the parties to participate in a Mandatory Settlement Conference before a long-cause matter or trial is set or heard. Absent a written court order allowing a party to appear remotely, both parties and their counsel of record shall personally attend the Mandatory Settlement Conference. Failure to comply may result in monetary sanctions, issues sanctions, or both. A Mandatory Settlement Conference may be continued by the Court for good cause, either on its own motion, upon a timely, properly noticed motion, or upon a stipulated request. (Rule 5.7(a) revised effective 1/1/23) (b) Mandatory Settlement Conference requirements Unless excused by the trial court, parties ordered to a Mandatory Settlement Conference with the Court shall comply with the following requirements. Self-represented parties who participate in the Volunteer Mediator Settlement Program are not required to comply with these requirements.
(1) At least 14 calendar days before the Mandatory Settlement Conference, the parties
shall:
(A) Exchange written offers of settlement in sufficient specificity to be
enforceable that, if accepted, would resolve all issues remaining in dispute.
Each party shall bring a copy of that party's written proposal to the
settlement conference.
(Rule 5.7(b)(2)(A) revised effective 1/1/23)
(B) Exchange Final Declarations of Disclosure (if not already done).
(2) At least 7 calendar days before the Mandatory Settlement conference, the parties
shall:
(A) File with the Court a Declaration re: Service of Final Declarations of
Disclosure, or alternatively, file a stipulation to waive service of final
declarations of disclosure.
(Rule 5.7(b)(2)(A) revised effective 1/1/16)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 111 of 200
Page 113¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(B) If support or attorney’s fees and costs or other financial relief is at issue,
the parties shall exchange and file updated I&Es, unless the party has filed
an I&E within 90 calendar days of the date of the hearing and there have
been no significant changes in the party's income, assets or expenses.
(Rule 5.7(b)(2)(B) revised effective 1/1/23)
(C) File a Joint Statement of Contested Issues describing all issues that remain
in dispute. That statement shall include, where it is an issue, the parties’
respective proposals for the division of property and debts. If late or
missing payments are claimed, a calculation spreadsheet shall also be
attached. If the parties are unable to agree upon a Joint Statement of
Contested Issues, then each party shall file and serve a Separate
Statement of Contested Issue which includes all of the information required
for a Joint Statement of Contested Issues.
(Rule 5.7(b)(2)(C) revised effective 1/1/18)
(D) File a Mandatory Settlement Conference Statement or other such filings as
may be required by the Court.
(Rule 5.7(b)(2)(D) revised effective 1/1/15)
(3) At least 5 calendar days before the date of the settlement conference, the parties
and, if they are represented, their counsel, shall meet and confer either in person,
by telephone or as ordered by the Court to attempt in good faith to resolve all
issues. If a restraining order prohibits face-to-face contact between parties, the
parties are not required to meet and confer. If one party is represented by counsel
in a case involving a restraining or protective order that prohibits contact between
the parties, then the attorney and the self-represented party shall comply with this
requirement.
Rule 5.7(b)(3) new effective 1/1/23)
(4) If both parties fail to comply with this Order, then the Court may vacate any pending
trial date. If only one party fails to comply and the other does, the Court may
impose sanctions at the Mandatory Settlement Conference, including but not
limited to issue sanctions and monetary sanctions.
(Rule 5.7(b)(4) renumbered and revised effective 1/1/18)
(c) Trial judge as settlement judge and Volunteer Mediator Settlement Program (1) The Mandatory Settlement Conference may be conducted by the bench officer assigned to the matter, unless it is otherwise ordered. If any party objects to the assigned judge presiding over the settlement conference, the party shall file a written objection at least 30 calendar days before the Mandatory Settlement Conference so the Court can arrange for a different bench officer to handle the settlement conference or reschedule the settlement conference for a day when a different bench officer is available. (Rule 5.7(c)(1) renumbered and revised effective 1/1/23)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 112 of 200
Page 114¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(2) In cases where both parties are self-represented, the Court may suggest that the
parties participate in the Volunteer Mediator Settlement Program. In that program,
the settlement mediation is conducted by a neutral attorney who volunteers his/her
time to assist the Court in conducting settlement conferences between self -
represented litigants.
(Rule 5.7(c)(2) revised effective 1/1/23)
(d) Settlements Any agreement reached in an MSC shall be reduced to writing, signed by the parties, and submitted to the Court within 10 days of the MSC.
(Rule 5.7 revised effective 1/1/23)
Rule 5.8. Recommendation Conference (a) Purpose and attendance The purpose of the Recommendation Conference is to receive the report of a custody evaluator and attempt to resolve custody and visitation issues without trial. Absent a written court order allowing a party to appear remotely, both parties and their counsel of record shall personally attend the Recommendation Conference and be prepared to discuss the recommendations of the Evaluator. Failure to comply may result in monetary sanctions, issues sanctions, or both. If the parties are unable to resolve custody and visitation issues without trial, the Court may, at the Recommendation Conference, make interim orders pending trial. (Rule 5.8(a) revised effective 1/1/18) (b) Timing Recommendation Conferences are set based on the expectation that the evaluation will be prepared and submitted to the parties and counsel at least 10 calendar days before the Recommendation Conference. Should the Evaluator determine that it will not be possible to prepare the evaluation report by that time, said Evaluator shall forthwith notify both counsel, or party (if self-represented) and provide to counsel or the self-represented party a date by which the Evaluator expects the report will be done. Counsel or the self - represented party shall notify the Court promptly, either in writing or by telephone conference call. Based on the Evaluator’s notice of inability to complete the report timely, the Court may re-set the date of the Recommendation Conference. (Rule 5.8(b) revised effective 1/1/23) (Rule 5.8 revised effective 1/1/23)
Rule 5.9. Trials (a) Long cause matters These rules apply to any trial set on the long cause trial calendar and, as determined by the Court, to any long cause hearings.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 113 of 200
Page 115¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(Rule 5.9(a) revised effective 1/1/13)
(b) Trial setting (1) Matters may be set for trial at a Case Management Conference/Family-Centered Case Resolution Conference, at a hearing on a Request for Order, at a Settlement Conference, or at a Recommendation Conference. (Rule 5.9(b)(1) revised effective 1/1/18)
(2) If no hearings are scheduled, a party may initiate the trial setting process by filing
a Request for Case Management Conference (Local Court Form FamLaw-112).
The Request for Case Management Conference may only be filed after a response
has been filed, and will not be accepted for filing until all parties have served their
Preliminary Declarations of Disclosure and filed the Declaration Re Service of
Declaration of Disclosure, or obtained a court order waiving this requirement per
Family Code Section 2107. The filing of the Request for Case Management
Conference will result in the setting of a Case Management Conference/Family -
Centered Case Resolution Conference.
(Rule 5.9(b)(2) revised effective 1/1/17)
(c) Continuances Trials may only be continued by the bench officer who will try the case. Any motion for a continuance shall be made in a timely manner, and for good cause. (Rule 5.9(c) revised effective 1/1/18) (d) Case Management Order / Family Centered Case Resolution Conference Order The Court may issue and amend from time to time, an appropriate Case Management/Family-Centered Case Resolution Conference Order or Pre-Trial Order to regulate pre-trial and trial proceedings and to set forth a schedule for the submission of papers such as briefs, documents, forms, and exhibits. (Rule 5.9(d) revised effective 1/1/18) (e) Evidence Code section 730 experts (1) The Court encourages mutually agreed upon experts, especially for such issues as custody evaluations, business valuations, business cash flow analyses (when relevant to support), real estate valuations, stock option calculations and tax consequences. In the absence of a mutually agreed upon expert, the Court may appoint its own expert under Evidence Code Section 730.
(2) If one or more written reports are issued by such an expert, copies of all such
reports shall be transmitted to each counsel or unrepresented party at least 30
calendar days before trial.
(3) If a 730 expert's written report was prepared and will be offered at trial, and either
counsel or an unrepresented party demands the right to cross-examine the expert
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 114 of 200
Page 116¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
at trial with respect to the matters in the report, that party shall be responsible for
arranging for the attendance of the expert at trial. The party shall make such arrangements at least 5 calendar days after being served with a copy of the report or 45 calendar days before trial, whichever occurs later. If there is no written report of the expert, the party intending to call the expert at trial shall be responsible for making the witness available on the day of trial. (Rule 5.9(e) revised effective 1/1/23)
(f) Reporter’s fees (1) As of the effective date of these rules, court reporters shall be assigned in Family Law Departments. Consult the “Court Reporters: Notice of Availability” on the Court’s website for the current status and any changes. There will be no official record of the proceedings unless a court reporter is provided pursuant to Local Rule 2.53 or a party who desires an official record makes arrangements for a private certified court reporter as set forth in Local Rule 2.52.
(2) Parties shall be responsible for all transcript costs pursuant to Government Code
Section 69953.
(Rule 5.9(f) revised effective 1/1/20)
(g) Removing Matter from Calendar Any stipulation to vacate or continue a trial shall be filed with the Court, with a courtesy copy provided to the department hearing the matter, at least 5 days before the trial.
(Rule 5.9(g) new effective 1/1/23)
(Rule 5.9 revised effective 1/1/23)
Rule 5.10. Preparation and Presentation of Orders (a) Proposed orders entered at hearing The Court may consider signing, at the time of hearing, proposed orders attached to the moving or responsive papers or those orders prepared by either party in court immediately following the hearing. Parties are therefore encouraged to submit proposed orders with their moving or responsive papers. (Rule 5.10(a) revised effective 1/1/15) (b) Orders submitted after hearing Where feasible, attorneys directed to prepare an order after hearing shall prepare and submit the order to the Court on the day of the hearing. If that is not feasible, the parties shall comply with the timing requirements of California Rules of Court, Rule 5.125. If a court reporter was present at the hearing, and the parties cannot comply with the timing requirements of Rule 5.125 because they require a transcript of the proceedings to resolve
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 115 of 200
Page 117¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
disputes over the form of order, the parties shall advise the bench officer that the transcript has been ordered and the expected date of availability of the transcript. Failure to submit Orders After Hearing in accordance with Rule 5.125 may result in the imposition of sanctions. (Rule 5.10(b) revised effective 1/1/23)
(c) Stipulations All agreements, stipulations, or agreed-upon orders reached before hearing shall be in writing, signed by all parties and counsel (where applicable) and submitted to the Court for signature before the hearing on the matter begins. Stipulations shall not be recited in open court, except at the discretion of the bench officer. (Rule 5.10(c) revised effective 1/1/18) (d) Submission of earning assignment orders and income withholding orders A copy of the judgment or current order for child, partner, spousal or family support shall be submitted with any proposed earning assignment order or income withholding order. In addition, copies of proposed earnings assignment orders or income withholding orders that will be returned to the requesting party, or his/her attorney, after filing shall be provided. (Rule 5.10(d) new effective 1/1/18) (Rule 5.10 revised effective 1/1/18)
Rule 5.11. Judgments (a) Judgment requirements Pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rules 5.401(c) and 5.411(b), judgments shall include all matters subject to the court’s jurisdiction for which a party seeks adjudication, or an explicit reservation of jurisdiction over any matter not proposed for disposition at that time. (Rule 5.11(a) revised effective 1/1/18) (b) Use of judgment checklist form For Dissolution of Marriage and Legal Separation cases, parties shall use the Judgment Checklist-Dissolution/Legal Separation (Judicial Council Form FL-182). For Parentage cases, parties may refer to the Parentage Judgment Checklist (Local Court Form FamLaw-013b). (Rule 5.11(b) revised effective 1/1/18) (c) Notarized signatures of self-represented parties to judgment If the parties submit a signed default judgment (“default with Agreement”), the signature of the defaulting party shall be notarized.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 116 of 200
Page 118¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(Rule 5.11(c) revised effective 1/1/18)
(d) Approval of Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) If DCSS is providing services in a case, a proposed judgment shall not be submitted without DCSS's written approval of the child support provisions of the judgment. (Rule 5.11(d) revised effective 1/1/18) (e) Relief Requested in True Default In a True Default, relief may not exceed the relief requested in the operative petition. (Rule 5.11(e) revised effective 1/1/18) (f) Judgment Processing All default and uncontested judgments for dissolution or legal separation will be processed in the order in which they are received. If there are emergency circumstances that necessitate a judgment be processed sooner, a party may file a declaration explaining the basis for their request to expedite processing, with proof substantiating the emergency attached, and submit along with their proposed judgment to the Legal Technicians at the Ex Parte Window. (Local Form FamLaw-34 may be used for this purpose.)
(Rule 5.11(f) new effective 1/1/24)
(Rule 5.11 revised effective 1/1/24)
Rule 5.12. Appointment of Elisor Where one of the parties will not or cannot execute a document necessary to carry out a court order, the clerk of the court, or the clerk’s authorized representative or designee may be appointed as an elisor to sign the document. An application for appointment of an elisor may be made ex parte. When applying for an appointment of an elisor, the application and proposed order must designate ‘The Clerk of the Court or Clerk’s Designee’ as the elisor and indicate for whom the elisor is being appointed and in what capacity they are to sign the document. The application must not set forth a specific court employee.
The order must expressly identify the document being signed and a copy of the document must be attached to the proposed order. The original document, presented for signature by the elisor, must match the copy of the document attached to the proposed order. The declaration supporting the application must include specific facts establishing the necessity for the appointment of the elisor. If the elisor is signing documents requiring notarization, the applicant must arrange for a notary public to be present when the elisor signs the document(s). (Rule 5.12 revised effective 1/1/23)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 117 of 200
Page 119¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 5.13. Confidentiality (a) Placement of confidential documents Certain documents are required to be kept confidential. They shall be placed in the confidential portion of the court file and may not be disclosed to anyone except in accordance with law. (Rule 5.13(a) revised effective 1/1/23) (b) Substance abuse assessment reports Substance abuse assessment reports shall be placed in the confidential portion of the court file. (Rule 5.13(b) revised effective 1/1/15) (c) Confidentiality of social security number If any document filed with the Court or offered as evidence contains a social security number, that number shall be redacted by the party offering the document before it is filed with the Court or marked as an exhibit. (Rule 5.13(c) revised effective 1/1/18) (Rule 5.13 =revised effective 1/1/23)
Rule 5.14. Family Law Facilitator (a) Facilitator services pursuant to Family Code Section 10004-10005 In addition to other services and duties, the Family Law Facilitator shall comply with the requirements of state law and perform the services set out in Family Code Section 10004, consistent with funding restrictions and priorities for service that are periodically set by the Court. (Rule 5.14(a) revised effective 1/1/18) (b) Additional duties If the foregoing has been accomplished, the Family Law Facilitator may also perform additional duties as referenced in Family Code Section 10005. (Rule 5.14(b) revised effective 1/1/18) (Rule 5.14 renumbered and revised effective 1/1/18)
Rule 5.15. Temporary Spousal or Partner Support (a) Discretionary guideline The Court shall use the formula contained in the Local Rules of the Superior Court of Alameda County (Alameda Superior Court, Local Rule 5.70) as its discretionary guideline
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 118 of 200
Page 120¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
for temporary spousal support or partner support in marital and domestic partnership dissolution cases. (Rule 5.15(a) revised effective 1/1/18)
(b) Adjustment for tax consequences In domestic partnership cases, the Court will adjust the formula to account for tax treatment under state and federal laws if necessary. (Rule 5.15(b) revised effective 1/1/15) (Rule 5.15 renumbered and revised effective 1/1/18)
Rule 5.16. Presence of Children in Courtroom (1) Unless a child whose custody or visitation is at issue and has been given court permission to address the court or testify per Family Code section 3042 and California Rule of Court, rule 5.250, that child shall not be present in the assigned courtroom while the matter is being heard, unless the judicial officer has specifically given permission for the child to be present. (Rule 5.16 renumbered effective 1/1/19)
Rule 5.17. Family Court Services Appointments (Mediation, Information Gathering and Child Custody Recommended Counseling) (a) Good faith effort to reach agreement Except in those cases where domestic violence or other restraining orders have been issued or are pending hearing, or where there are allegations of child abuse or neglect currently under investigation, all parties shall make a good faith effort to arrive at an agreement regarding child custody and visitation before contacting Family Court Services to schedule appointments and before the court hearing. (Rule 5.17(a) revised effective 7/1/18)
(b) Types of Family Court Services Appointments. Confidential Mediation (Tier I below) shall be made available in all cases in which child custody counseling/visitation is at issue; the remaining services, including any additional Tier I appointments, shall be scheduled at the discretion of and as directed by the family law judicial officer according to the needs of the case (Family Code section 3170). (1) Confidential Mediation (Tier I). Tier I referrals provide confidential mediation for families who have been unable to reach an agreement regarding custody, parenting time, and/or visitation.
(a) In most cases, parties must attend Tier I confidential mediation before a judicial officer will consider a higher tier process. In an appropriate case, the judicial officer
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 119 of 200
Page 121¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
may order a referral of the parties to expedited or emergency child custody
recommending counseling (Tier III) without first attending confidential mediation
(Tier I).
(b) Children shall not participate in Tier I unless directed by the court, the Family
Court Services administrator, or the Family Court Services mediator (Family Code
section 3180).
(c) Tier I is confidential except that the mediator shall report any suspected child
abuse, elder abuse, if someone is a danger to themselves or others, and/or if the
mediator receives information that a parent has committed or intends to commit a
serious crime (Penal Code section 11166).
(Rule 5.17(b)(1) revised effective 1/1/23)
(2) Information Gathering (Tier II). Tier II referrals are for the purpose of gathering
information. A judicial officer has the discretion to include any specific areas of
inquiry in a Tier II referral including, but not limited to, contact with law enforcement,
contact with Child Protective Services, and interviews with the child(ren) or other
collateral contacts. A Tier II summary report shall be submitted to the court. The
confidentiality of Tier II sessions is limited because a report is provided to the court.
(Rule 5.17(b)(2) revised effective 1/1/19)
(3) Child Custody Recommending Counseling (Tier III). Tier III referrals are child
custody recommending counseling sessions. If an agreement is reached, the child
custody recommending counselor will document the agreement. Otherwise, the
child custody recommending counselor will prepare a summary report and submit
a recommendation to the court, the litigants and the litigants’ attorney(s). The
confidentiality of Tier III sessions is limited because a report is provided to the
court.
(4) If parties are later referred to Tier II or Tier III, the Tier I mediator will not be
assigned to conduct Tier II or Tier III in the absence of unusual circumstances as
determined by the Manager of Family Court Services or order of the court after a
hearing before a judicial officer.
(Rule 5.17(b) revised effective 1/1/19)
(c) Arranging for a Family Court Services Appointment (1) Upon the filing of the Request for Order or Domestic Violence Restraining Order involving a custody/visitation, the parties shall complete the family court services online orientation program located on the court’s website and shall arrange for an appointment with Family Court Services. Parties are to complete the online Family Court Services orientation class at www.cc-courts.org/onlineorientation (English) or www.cc-courts.org/orientacionenlinea (Spanish). Parties shall complete the orientation at least 5 days prior to their Family Court Services appointment. The purpose of orientation is to provide the parties with information about the Court process, with knowledge of collaborative parenting plan development, child rearing
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 120 of 200
Page 122¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
in multiple homes, the impacts of domestic violence, and children’s developmental
needs as related to post-separation parenting arrangements. If it is necessary for
a party to complete orientation in a language other than English or Spanish, the
party shall call the Family Court Services Office to make alternate arrangements.
Sanctions and/or fees may be imposed for failure to complete the online
orientation.
(2) If parties have participated in a Family Court Services appointment within the
previous six months, Family Court Services shall direct the parties to first attend
their court hearing before an appointment will be scheduled, unless Family Court
Services is otherwise ordered by a judge to immediately schedule an appointment.
In their discretion, judges may direct Family Court Services to not schedule an
appointment if parties have completed an appointment within 12 months prior to a
court hearing.
(3) If a party is requesting a “move-away” order, the moving party is strongly
encouraged to specifically state that request in the moving papers. A Mediator’s
or Child Custody Recommending Counselor’s ability to address a “move-away”
request in custody counseling may be significantly limited unless a request for a
“move-away” order is specifically stated in a party’s moving papers.
(4) If the custody or visitation hearing is scheduled before the Family Court Services
appointment, and the case does not involve current domestic violence, criminal or
other protective order, the parties may agree to request a continuance of the
hearing by completing and filing a Stipulation and Order Re: Continuance of Court
Hearing to a Date After the Family Court Services Appointment (Local Court Form
FamLaw-230). No fee is due with the filing of this form.
(5) Meeting separately. A party who has a restraining order or alleges under penalty
of perjury that they have been a victim of domestic violence, even though there is
no current restraining order, may request to meet separately.
(6) Support Persons. Protected parties or parties who allege domestic violence may
have a support person in the session. The support person must be at least 18
years of age and cannot be the attorney of record for either party. The support
person must sign a Family Court Services form agreeing to keep the session
confidential. The support person is for emotional support and is not present to
speak or offer comments during the session, nor to offer advice to the parent. If
the support person is disruptive to the session, the counselor will exclude the
support person.
(7) Appearances. Mediation appointments may be set in-person or remotely via
telephone or video at the discretion of Family Court Services and the Court. Parties
shall appear as ordered. If the party appears remotely, the party shall join the
remote video session and/or place the telephone call to Family Court Services at
the time of the appointment. Parties will be expected to verify their identity when
checking in for their mediation appointment.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 121 of 200
Page 123¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(Rule 5.17(c) revised effective 1/1/23)
(d) Agreements (1) Agreements reached prior to scheduling mediation. If the parties reach a complete agreement regarding custody and visitation before scheduling a Family Court Services appointment, they shall submit a written stipulation to the Court and they do not need to contact Family Court Services. Self-represented parties may obtain assistance from the Family Law Facilitator’s Office for guidance in preparing a stipulation. Hours of service and location for the Family Law Facilitator’s Office are available on the court’s website at www.cc-courts.org/family/flf.aspx. (2) Agreements reached after scheduling mediation. If the parties reach a complete agreement regarding custody and visitation after they have scheduled their appointment, the parties shall submit a written stipulation to the Court and both parties shall contact Family Court Services to cancel existing appointments at least 24 hours in advance. Sanctions and/or fees may be imposed on any party that fails to contact Family Court Services to cancel at least 24 hours before the scheduled appointment. (3) Full or partial agreement reached during mediation. If the parties reach an agreement during mediation regarding all or some of the custody and visitation issues, the Family Court Services mediator shall prepare the written agreement and send copies to the parties and attorneys of record, and submit the original to the Court. If there are no other issues remaining to be decided, the parties may advise the mediator that the Court hearing should be vacated and that the agreement be adopted by the Court as an order. The Court will then file and send a copy of the filed order to the parties.
(Rule 5.17(d) renumbered and revised effective 1/1/23)
(e) Ex parte Communication in Family Court Services Appointments All Family Court Services appointments shall be held in private, and all communications from the parties to the Mediator or Child Custody Recommending Counselor shall be deemed official information within the meaning of Evidence Code Section 1040. The Mediator/Child Custody Recommending Counselor may exclude attorneys from the Family Court Services appointment in the sole discretion of the Mediator/Child Custody Recommending Counselor. (Rule 5.17(e) renumbered and revised effective 7/1/18) (f) Ex parte communication with Family Court Services Mediators and Child Custody Recommending Counselors Neither party may contact the Mediator/Child Custody Recommending Counselor prior to their appointment. All communication between Family Court Services Mediators and Child Custody Recommending Counselors and the parties/attorneys shall be by telephone conference or in writing, with copies sent to the other party/attorney, even where the
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 122 of 200
Page 124¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Mediators and Child Custody Recommending Mediator/Child Counselor initiates the
communication. If the communication is in writing, the party submitting the writing shall
send it to the parties/attorneys simultaneously and by the same method (i.e., fax, mail or
email). Email and faxes shall also be copied to all parties/attorneys. In urgent
circumstances or when the Mediator/Child Custody Recommending Counselor is unable
to set up a telephone conference with the parties/attorneys and there is insufficient time
to correspond in writing with both parties/attorneys, the Mediator/Child Custody
Recommending Counselor may initiate contact with one party/attorney for the purpose of
clarifying information or obtaining additional information for a status report. The
Mediator/Child Custody Recommending Counselor shall disclose such ex parte
communication to the other party/attorney if this occurs. Questions regarding scheduling
or other procedural matters may be discussed with the Family Court Services clerical staff.
(Rule 5.17(f) revised effective 1/1/22)
(g) Documents Provided to Family Court Services. FCS is not obligated to retain any documents provided to FCS by the parties or other collateral sources. Although the Mediator/Child Custody Recommending Counselor has the discretion to temporarily retain supplemental documents, all supporting documents will be destroyed, in a confidential manner, by FCS staff at the conclusion of the mediation/child custody recommending counseling services and FCS will not provide copies of supplemental documents to the Court or to the other party on the case.
(h) Family Court Services Complaint Process (1) At the earliest possible time, and no later than 5 court days before the custody/visitation hearing, a party may file a written complaint, in the form of a declaration signed under penalty of perjury, specifying alleged misconduct of a Mediator/Child Custody Recommending Counselor. A copy of the declaration shall be served on the other party and a proof of service shall be filed. The party shall also provide a copy of the declaration to the Manager of Family Court Services. The other party may file a written response. A copy of the response shall be served on the other party and a proof of service shall be filed before the next hearing date. The responding party shall also provide a copy of the written response to the Manager of Family Court Services. The Manager of Family Court Services shall investigate the complaint and respond in writing to the complainant and the responding party.
(2) No change of counselor will be granted unless there is substantial showing that the
counselor is biased or prejudiced against one of the parties or is unable to render a
fair and impartial recommendation.
(Rule 5.17(g) renumbered and revised effective 1/1/23)
(i) Child Custody Recommending Counselors as Witnesses
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 123 of 200
Page 125¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
In lieu of a subpoena and appropriate fee as described in California Government Code section 68097.2, should a party wish to compel the appearance of a Family Court Services Child Custody Recommending Counselor as a witness at a custody/visitation trial, the party can notify Family Court Services in writing that the Custody Counselor's testimony is required. The notice shall state the date and time of the hearing, and the time when the Custody Counselor is expected to be called as a witness and shall be provided to Family Court Services at least 5 court days before the hearing date. A non-refundable check in the appropriate amount as described in California Government Code Section 68097.2 shall accompany the written request for the Child Custody Recommending Counselor’s appearance. (Rule 5.17(h) renumbered 1/1/23)
(j) Second Confidential Mediation (Tier I), Information Gathering (Tier II) or Child Custody Recommending Counseling (Tier III) Appointment on a Current Motion (1) Parties who are ordered to return to Family Court Services for a second Tier I, Tier II or Tier III Family Court Services appointment on a current motion may be charged a fee for such return services in the amount of $250.
(2) Where parties attend Family Court Services appointment, reach an agreement,
subsequently rescind the agreement, and then wish to return or are ordered to
return to Family Court Services for an additional appointment, Family Court
Services may charge a fee as set forth in subsection (1) above.
(Rule 5.17(i) renumbered effective 1/1/22)
(k) Family Court Services Reports and Recommendations (1) When a child custody recommending counselor completes a Tier II Information Gathering Appointment, the child custody recommending counselor shall prepare a written report but will not include any recommendations. The report shall be submitted to the parties and to the Family Law Department hearing the matter. The department shall file the report in a confidential portion of the Court file. Pursuant to the Standing Order of the Presiding Judge of this Court, use of this document shall be limited to the pending litigation and no person who has access to the document shall disseminate or disclose its contents to any person not entitled to access, nor shall the parties attach such document to any pleading in this or any other litigation or proceeding. Substantial sanctions shall be imposed upon any party who violates this order, whether intentionally, by mistake or by accident.
(2) When the parties do not reach an agreement during a Tier III Child Custody
Recommending Counseling Appointment, the Child Custody Recommending
Counselor shall prepare a written Status Report that includes the Child Custody
Recommending Counselor’s recommendations. The report shall be submitted to
the parties and to the Family Law Department hearing the matter. The department
shall file the report in a confidential portion of the Court file. Pursuant to the
Standing Order of the Presiding Judge of this Court, use of this document shall be
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 124 of 200
Page 126¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
limited to the pending litigation and no person who has access to the document
shall disseminate or disclose its contents to any person not entitled to access, nor
shall the parties attach such document to any pleading in this or any other litigation
or proceeding. Substantial sanctions shall be imposed upon any party who
violates this order, whether intentionally, by mistake or by accident.
(3) Persons entitled to access the report and the information contained in the report
are limited to the parties, their attorneys, federal or state law enforcement, judicial
officers, necessary court employees, and minor’s counsel, except upon order of
the Court.
(Rule 5.17(j) renumbered and revised effective 7/1/18)
(l) Private Mediator Parties may jointly agree to retain a private mediator pursuant to Family Code section 3164. The parties shall complete and submit to the court the Stipulation and Order for Private Child Custody Recommending Counselor (local court Form FamLaw-300) for approval. Within 10 court days of receiving the order of appointment by the court, the private mediator shall file and serve on all parties the Consent to Appointment as Private Confidential Mediator or Child Custody Recommending Counselor and Declaration Regarding Qualifications (local court Form FamLaw-301). (Rule 5.17(k) renumbered effective 1/1/22) (Rule 5.17 revised effective 1/1/22)
Rule 5.18. Child Custody Evaluations (a) Court ordered evaluations All evaluators appointed by the Court to conduct child custody and visitation evaluations, whether by stipulation or otherwise, shall be appointed under Evidence Code Section 730. (Rule 5.18(a) revised effective 1/1/16) (b) Evaluator selection Where the parties are unable to agree on an evaluator to conduct the custody evaluation, the Court shall select an evaluator for the parties in a manner as determined by the Court. If the Evaluator appointed by the Court does not accept the appointment, the parties or their attorneys shall contact the Court and request the appointment of a different evaluator.
FCS will maintain a list of private child custody evaluators who have represented that they meet the training and education requirements of California Rules of Court, Rules 5.225 and 5.230. This list shall be available on the Court’s website. (Rule 5.18(b) revised effective 7/1/25)
(c) Custody evaluation requirements An Order Appointing Child Custody Evaluator (Judicial Council Form FL-327) shall be filed and given to the Evaluator before the evaluation begins. The Evaluator shall file a
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 125 of 200
Page 127¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Declaration of Private Child Custody Evaluator Regarding Qualifications (Judicial Council Form FL-326). Each party and each party’s counsel shall follow the procedures set forth in the Order Appointing Child Custody Evaluator. The Evaluator shall comply with the requirements of California Rules of Court, Rule 5.220. (Rule 5.18(c) revised effective 1/1/18)
(d) Scope of the evaluation When appropriate, in the interest of saving the parties’ time, expense and stress, the evaluation may be limited in scope (focused evaluation) to the question or questions that the Court requires answered. (Rule 5.18(d) revised effective 1/1/01) (e) Challenge of the evaluator No peremptory challenge to an evaluator shall be allowed. Parties may raise objections to a specific evaluator during the selection process. Parties may object to the conclusions of the report when the report is submitted to the Court, and may bring other appropriate expert testimony to object to the conclusions. (California Rules of Court, Rule 5.220(d)(1).) (Rule 5.18(e) revised effective 1/1/18) (f) Withdrawal from a case A private evaluator may withdraw from a case upon a showing of good cause to the trial court making the appointment. (Rule 5.18(f) new effective 1/1/18) (g) Information from children The Court relies on the judgment of its experts in making decisions about when, how often, and under what circumstances children are interviewed. The expert shall be able to justify the strategy used in any particular case. Children will be informed that the information provided by the child will not be confidential before beginning the interview. (California Rules of Court, Rule 5.220(d)(2).) (Rule 5.18(g) revised effective 1/1/17)
(h) Impartial expert The court-appointed evaluator shall be impartial. Evaluators should include in-person interviews of both parents or guardians, unless geographical distance or other factors make in-person interviews impractical. In such instances, attorneys, parties and the expert shall make reasonable accommodation to assure that the expert has received adequate information about all parents, guardians, or parties. (Rule 5.18(h) revised effective 1/1/18) (i) Grievance procedure
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 126 of 200
Page 128¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
If a party alleges that an unprofessional or inappropriate act has occurred on the part of
the Evaluator during the course of the evaluation, the party may discuss the complaint with the Evaluator directly in order to handle misunderstandings.
Complaints or grievances concerning the Evaluator will not be considered by the Court until after the evaluation is completed, at the Recommendation Conference. All such complaints and grievances must be submitted to the bench officer hearing the matter at least 15 calendar days before the Recommendation Conference, with copies to the Evaluator and all other parties. The Evaluator shall submit a written response to all issues raised in the written complaint to the bench officer hearing the matter at least 2 calendar days before the Recommendation Conference, with copies to all parties. The bench officer will address the complaint at the time of the Recommendation Conference. If the party submitting the complaint objects to the bench officer’s resolution of the complaint, the complaint or grievance shall become an issue at trial. (Rule 5.18(i) revised effective 1/1/23) (j) Expectation of settlement The parties and the attorneys should make a good faith attempt to settle the custody and visitation disputes before the Recommendation Conference and any subsequent trial. Settlement efforts may include joint meet and confer conferences between the parties and counsel unless potential harm exists from this process. (Rule 5.18(j) revised effective 1/1/16) (k) Continuing effort The Court may ask the Evaluator to continue to be available to the family to help resolve problems with any order made following the Evaluator’s recommendations. (Rule 5.18(k) revised effective 1/1/16) (l) Payment of the evaluation The Court shall make orders concerning payment of the Evaluator at the time of the appointment. The Evaluator may not withhold a report from the Court because of the parties’ failure to pay. Either party or the appointed custody evaluator may file a Request for Order regarding unpaid custody evaluator fee(s). (Rule 5.18(l) revised effective 1/1/18) (m) Evaluation report (1) The Evaluator shall prepare and submit both an evaluation report and recommendations to the parties, counsel, and the Court. The Department hearing the matter shall secure the evaluation report in a confidential portion of the Court file. Pursuant to the standing Order of the Presiding Judge of this Court, use of this document shall be limited to the pending litigation and no person who has access to the document shall disseminate or disclose its contents to any person not entitled to access, nor shall the parties attach such document to any pleading in this or any other litigation or proceeding. Substantial sanctions shall be imposed
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 127 of 200
Page 129¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
upon any party who violates this order, whether intentionally, by mistake or
inadvertence.
(2) Persons entitled to access the report and/or the information contained in the report
are limited to the parties, their attorneys, federal or state law enforcement, judicial
officers, necessary court employees, and minor’s counsel, except upon order of
the Court.
(Rule 5.18(m) revised effective 1/1/18)
(n) Ex parte communication with evaluator No party or attorney for a party shall initiate one-sided contact with the Evaluator, either orally or in writing before the first appointment of the initiating party except for the purpose of setting up that first appointment. Parties may initiate one-sided contact with the Evaluator after the first appointment of the party initiating the contact. The Evaluator may contact any party at any time. Attorneys may initiate contact after the first appointment of a party only by conference call or in writing copied to the other party. Contact may be made to arrange appointments without the necessity of a conference call. (Rule 5.18(n) revised effective 1/1/18) (Rule 5.18 revised effective 7/1/25)
Rule 5.19 — Court Communication for Domestic Violence and Child Custody Orders¶
Rule 5.19. Court Communication for Domestic Violence and Child Custody Orders (Adopted Pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 5.445) (a) Communication between the Criminal, Family, Juvenile and Probate Courts (1) Before requesting a Criminal Protective Order involving a defendant and a victim or witness who have a relationship as defined in Family Code Section 6211, the District Attorney shall make reasonable efforts to determine whether there are any children of the relationship, whether there are any Family, Juvenile, or Probate Court orders for custody/visitation for those children, and whether there are any existing protective/restraining orders involving the defendant, the protected person, and/or the children. The District Attorney shall advise the Criminal Court of the existence of any such orders at the time the proposed Criminal Protective Order is submitted for approval and signature.
(2) The Family, Juvenile or Probate Court setting terms of custody or visitation shall
make reasonable efforts to determine whether any person requesting custody or
visitation is subject to a Criminal Protective Order, including inquiring of the parties
whether there are any existing protective/restraining orders involving that person,
another person seeking custody or visitation, and/or the children.
(3) When the Criminal Court issues a Criminal Protective Order protecting a victim or
witness who has children with the defendant, the Criminal Court shall consider
whether peaceful contact with the protected person should be allowed for the
purpose of allowing defendant to have visitation with the children.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 128 of 200
Page 130¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(4) If any person named in a Criminal Protective Order is also before the Family,
Juvenile, or Probate Court in proceedings concerning custody or visitation, a court -
employed Child Custody Recommending Counselor or Court Investigator serving
the Family, Juvenile or Probate Court shall have access to and review the criminal
court file, as permitted by applicable law. Confidential information reviewed under
this rule remains confidential and shall not be further released except as provided
by law or court order.
(Rule 5.19(a) revised effective 1/1/17)
(b) Modification of Criminal Protective Orders (1) A party seeking to modify a Criminal Protective Order may calendar the matter for hearing before the Criminal Court, after giving notice to the District Attorney.
(2) The Family, Juvenile, or Probate Court may, on its own motion or at the request of
a defendant, protected person or other interested party, calendar a hearing before
the Criminal Court for a motion to modify a Criminal Protective Order. Notice of
the hearing shall be given to all counsel and parties in both the criminal action and
the family, juvenile, or probate matter.
(3) When the Family, Juvenile, or Probate Court calendars a hearing on a motion to
modify a Criminal Protective Order, or receives notice that a party with a pending
Family, Juvenile, or Probate matter involving minor children seeks to modify a
Criminal Protective Order, the Court shall provide the Criminal Court with copies
of existing or proposed Orders relating to protection, custody and/or visitation in
the pending family, juvenile, or probate matter.
(Rule 5.19(b) revised effective 1/1/23)
(Rule 5.19 revised effective 1/1/23)
Rule 5.20 — Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute.¶
Rule 5.20. Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute.
Pursuant to C.C.P. Sections 583.310 and 583.360(a), the Court shall, upon its own motion, dismiss cases without prejudice on the ground that the petitioner has failed to prosecute and to bring it to trial within five years after it was commenced against the respondent.
Rule 5.21 — Requirement for Current Mailing Address¶
Rule 5.21 Requirement for Current Mailing Address
An attorney or party whose mailing address, telephone number, fax number or e-mail address changes shall promptly file and serve on all parties a Notice of Change of Address or Other Contact Information (Judicial Council form MC-040). Addresses and other contact information will not be updated in the Court’s case management system without the filing of this form.
(Rule 5.21 new effective 1/1/23)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 129 of 200
Page 131¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Division 2 – Juvenile Matters
Chapter 1. Juvenile Department
Rule 5.50. Adoption, Construction and Amendment of Rules (a) Citation of Juvenile Rules These rules for the Juvenile Court may be cited as the "Local Rules for the Juvenile Court of Contra Costa County." (b) Supplemental authority of local Juvenile Rules These Local Rules shall be supplementary to and subject to state statutes and any rules adopted by the Judicial Council of the State of California. These rules shall be construed and applied so as not to conflict with such statutes or with the rules adopted by the Judicial Council. (c) Effective date of Juvenile local court rules These rules shall, on the date they become effective, supersede rules until adopted by the Superior Court as they relate to the Juvenile Court. (d) Use of Term “Juvenile Justice” Instead of “Juvenile Delinquency” These rules will use the term “juvenile justice,” which is to be read as synonymous with the term “juvenile delinquency” in the Welfare and Institutions Code and the California Rules of Court. (Rule 5.50 revised effective 1/1/21)
Rule 5.51. Juvenile Judge (a) Judicial assignments The Supervising Judge of the Juvenile Court shall be assisted by such judges and subordinate judicial officers (including commissioners and temporary judges) as may be provided from time to time by the Superior Court. The subordinate judicial officers and temporary judges shall perform their duties under the direction of the Supervising Judge of the Juvenile Court. (Rule 5.51(a) revised effective 1/1/16) (b) Juvenile hearings The business of the Juvenile Court shall be conducted at the Walnut Creek Courthouse and Juvenile Hall, and may be conducted at Pittsburg, Richmond and Martinez Courthouses, and at such other facilities of Contra Costa County, and at such times as the Juvenile Court Supervising Judge or Presiding Judge may direct. The Juvenile Court Supervising Judge shall be responsible for the distribution of court business. (Rule 5.51(b) revised effective 1/1/18)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 130 of 200
Page 132¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(c) Types of Juvenile hearings The Juvenile Court Supervising Judge and assigned judges shall conduct all hearings required for adjudication of juvenile cases, including transfer hearings, competency hearings, rehearings and other matters which they by order deem appropriate. Matters to be heard by a Juvenile Court Judge shall be calendared directly by that judge’s department. (Rule 5.51(c) revised effective 1/1/21) (d) Juvenile bench recusal If the only Juvenile Court judge available is removed from hearing a matter because of a challenge or otherwise, the matter shall be referred by the Supervising Juvenile Judge to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court. (Rule 5.51(d) revised effective 1/1/21) (e) Assignment of Juvenile hearings The Juvenile Court judges shall maintain separate calendars of all matters to be heard by them, which shall be published. When a case is assigned to a Juvenile Court Judge, it is assigned to that judge for all purposes. (Rule 5.51(e) revised effective 1/1/13) (f) Juvenile pre-hearing conference Pre-hearing conferences shall be conducted as determined by the Juvenile Court judges. Where such conference is held, attendance is mandatory as to all persons ordered to attend. At such conferences, counsel shall be familiar with the case, shall be prepared to enter into stipulations binding their clients, and shall be prepared to discuss the facts so as to clarify and simplify issues. (Rule 5.51(f) revised effective 1/1/13) (g) Juvenile policy and procedure The Juvenile Court Supervising Judge, in directing the judicial business of the Juvenile Court, may issue memoranda of policy and procedure to all parties involved in the Juvenile Court process, which shall be binding, subject to the authority of the Executive Committee and the Judges of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County. (Rule 5.51(g) revised effective 1/1/16) (Rule 5.51 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 5.52. Juvenile Court Commissioner (a) Appointment of Juvenile Court Commissioner As permitted by law, the Judges of the Superior Court, by majority vote, may, as resources allow, appoint a Juvenile Court Commissioner. Any commissioner so appointed shall have been admitted to practice law in California for not less than ten (10) years, shall hold office
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 131 of 200
Page 133¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
at the pleasure of the Supervising Judge of the Juvenile Court, and shall not engage in the practice of law. (Rule 5.52(a) revised effective 1/1/21)
(b) Authority of Juvenile Court Commissioner The Juvenile Court Commissioner shall perform the duties and shall have the powers prescribed by Code of Civil Procedure Section 259, and the duties and powers of a juvenile court referee as specified in Welfare and Institutions Code Section 248. (Rule 5.52(b) revised effective 1/1/16) (c) Juvenile court assignments as temporary judge Unless otherwise expressly specified, the Juvenile Commissioner, without further order of the Court, shall act as a temporary judge with respect to any and all juvenile actions, causes, or proceedings and whether regularly or specially assigned to the Juvenile Commissioner or to the Department in which the Juvenile Commissioner is sitting. Such duties and powers include, but are not limited to, conducting the trial, contest or hearing assigned actions, causes or proceedings, whether or not contested. (d) Juvenile stipulation to Commissioner Subordinate judicial officers shall hear their cases as commissioners and be identified as commissioners to all parties. Any party not objecting to the commissioner hearing the matter is deemed to have stipulated to such commissioner hearing the matter as a temporary judge. (Rule 5.52(d) revised effective 1/1/21) (e) Stipulation requirements for temporary judge When an attorney is sitting as a court-appointed temporary judge and hears a contested matter, the parties whose stipulation should be obtained are: the attorney for petitioner, the attorney(s) for the minor(s), and in applicable cases brought under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 300, the attorney for the parent, guardian or de facto parent. (Rule 5.52(e) revised effective 1/1/21)
(f) Vacation approval for subordinate judicial officers A subordinate judicial officer’s vacation time and other time away from his or her calendar shall be approved in advance by the Juvenile Court Supervising Judge. When a Juvenile subordinate judicial officer is absent, his or her calendar may be heard by:
(1) Court-appointed Temporary Judge
(2) The Juvenile Court Supervising Judge
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 132 of 200
Page 134¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(3) A Juvenile Court Judge or subordinate judicial officer as reassigned by the Juvenile
Court Supervising Judge.
(Rule 5.52(f) revised effective 7/1/05)
(Rule 5.52 revised effective 1/1/21)
Rule 5.53. Motions (a) Presentation of motions Except as provided by law, all motions shall be in writing, shall be heard before the attachment of jeopardy and shall be heard five (5) or more court days after notice unless the Court orders otherwise. The moving party shall clear the hearing date with the clerk of the juvenile court before filing any such motion. (Rule 5.53(a) revised effective 1/1/16) (b) Motion to continue the jurisdiction hearings A motion to continue the jurisdiction hearing in any proceeding shall be made and heard no less than two (2) court days before the jurisdiction hearing, after service of notice on the opposing party at least five (5) court days before the jurisdiction hearing. Said motion shall be in writing unless all parties to the action, with the concurrence of the Court before whom the hearing is to be held, waive the requirement of written notice. The Court, however, may continue a jurisdiction hearing on motion of any party at the proceeding for good cause without the requirements of this subdivision being fulfilled. Failure to file a motion to continue within the time frame specified in this rule, absent a showing of good cause resulting in the untimely filing of the motion, may result in the imposition of sanctions. (Rule 5.53(b) revised effective 1/1/18) (Rule 5.53 revised effective 1/1/18)
Rule 5.54. Appointment of Juvenile Court Appointed Counsel Juvenile Court judges shall be responsible for the appointment of counsel for children or minors in matters subject to the jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court. Unless otherwise ordered, appointments for minors in Welfare and Institutions Code Section 300 dependency cases shall be referred to the contracted dependency counsel program. Appointments for minors in Welfare and Institutions Code Section 602 juvenile justice cases shall be referred to the Public Defender’s Office or, in the case of a conflict of interest, to the Alternate Defender or Conflict Panel counsel. (Rule 5.54 revised effective 1/1/21)
Rule 5.55. Minute Order Minute orders in juvenile proceedings
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 133 of 200
Page 135¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(1) A minute order shall be prepared by the clerk of the Juvenile Court at the
conclusion of each court proceeding. Recommendations adopted by the Court may
be attached and incorporated into the minute order by reference.
(2) All parties to the action are entitled to receive a copy of the minute order upon
completion of that session of the judicial proceeding.
(3) Any party to the proceeding may waive receipt of the minute order.
(Rule 5.55 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 5.56. REPEALED
Rule 5.57. Public Hearings Unless provided otherwise by law, Juvenile Court proceedings shall be closed to the public; provided, however, that the Juvenile Court judge may admit such persons as he or she deems have a direct and legitimate interest in the particular case or the work of the Court.
(Rule 5.57 revised effective 1/1/21)
Rule 5.58. Records access by Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) For the purposes of implementing the Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) Program, volunteers serving in the program are considered court personnel as that term is used in Welfare and Institutions Code Section 827. They shall have access to Probation Department and Department of Family and Children’s Services files in the case(s) in which they are appointed as court appointed advocates as necessary to carry out their responsibilities.
(Rule 5.58 revised effective 1/1/21)
Rule 5.59. Inter-Agency Exchange of Information (a) Juvenile information access and exchange The disclosure of information concerning children and their parents by staff associated with Family Court Services, the Probation Department Juvenile Division, Children and Family Services, Case Management Council, Adult Probation Department and Probate Court Investigator’s office is generally prohibited by law. Nevertheless, a limited exchange of information about children or parents between these agencies in certain circumstances will serve the best interest of the child who is before the Court. The Court finds that the best interest of children and victims appearing in court and the public interest in avoiding duplication of effort by the courts and by the investigative agencies serving the juvenile and family courts, and the value of having relevant information gathered by a court agency outweighs the confidentiality interest reflected in Penal Code Sections 11167 and 11167.5
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 134 of 200
Page 136¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
and Welfare and Institutions Code Sections 827 and 10850 et seq., and therefore, good
cause exists for the following rule:
Concerning agency information sharing in the following types of cases before the Court:
(1) Juvenile Justice;
(2) Custody Disputes;
(3) Juvenile Dependency;
(4) Probate investigation (Conservatorship and Guardianship); and
(5) Criminal
In such cases, the representatives of the above listed agencies who are investigating or
supervising cases involving children may disclose information to each other, including the
exchange of records, reports and other documentation in their files regarding minors within
the jurisdiction of the family, probate or juvenile courts or subject to proceedings therein,
if such exchange of information will assist the agency receiving the information in serving
the needs of children or reporting facts to the court.
(b) Juvenile inter-agency sharing of information All county agencies and agencies contracting with the county to provide treatment to juveniles may share information with each other as to juveniles within the jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court that the agencies treat in common. (Rule 5.59 revised effective 7/1/21)
Rule 5.60. REPEALED
Rule 5.61. Experience, Training, Education (a) Minimum competency standards for court-appointed attorneys Effective July 1, 1996, all appointed attorneys appearing in juvenile dependency and delinquency proceedings shall be familiar with and comply with the minimum standards of competence set forth in California Rules of Court, Rules 5.660 and 5.664 and any applicable Welfare and Institutions Code Sections. (Rule 5.61 revised effective 1/1/18)
Rule 5.62. Screening for Competency (a) Minimum competency standards for court-appointed attorneys All attorneys appearing in juvenile dependency and juvenile justice proceedings shall be familiar with, and shall not appear unless they have met, the minimum standards of competence for juvenile proceedings. The contracted dependency counsel program shall, before assigning any dependency case to any attorney, assure that the assigned attorney
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 135 of 200
Page 137¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
meets the requirements of California Rule of Court 5.660. The Office of the Public Defender, the Office of the Alternate Defender, and the Criminal Conflicts Panel shall, before assigning any juvenile justice case to any attorney, assure that the assigned attorney meets the requirements of California Rule of court 5.664.
(b) Continuing education for court-appointed attorneys. Each court-appointed attorney who represents any party in juvenile dependency proceedings shall complete all continuing education requirements imposed by California Rule of Court 5.660(d)(3)(b). Each attorney who represents minors in juvenile justice proceedings shall complete all continuing education requirements imposed by California Rule of Court 5.667(c). Every attorney subject to this rule shall maintain records of compliance with continuing education requirements and provide the records to the Court upon request. Such records may include a copy of a certificate of attendance issued by a California MCLE provider; a certificate of attendance issued by a professional organization that provides compliant training and/or education for its members, whether or not it is a MCLE provider; or a record of attendance at a court-sponsored or approved program. (c) Standards of representation All court-appointed attorneys appearing in dependency proceedings shall meet the following minimum standards of representation:
(1) Attorneys shall meet regularly with clients, including clients who are children,
contact social workers and other professionals associated with the client’s case,
work with other counsel and the Court to resolve disputed aspects of a case without
hearing, and adhere to the mandated time lines.
(2) If the client is a child, the attorney or the attorney’s agent shall have contact with
the client before each hearing. The attorney or attorney’s agent shall interview all
children four (4) years of age or older in person, if possible. Whenever possible,
the child shall be interviewed or seen at the child’s placement. The attorney or
attorney’s agent shall also interview the child’s caretaker, particularly when the
child is under four (4) years of age.
(3) If the client is not the child, the attorney or the attorney’s agent shall interview the
client at least once before the jurisdictional hearing unless that client is unavailable.
Afterward, the attorney or the attorney’s agent shall contact the client at least once
before each hearing unless the client is unavailable.
(Rule 5.62 revised effective 1/1/21)
Rule 5.63. Mediation (a) Mediation of contested jurisdictional hearings In any case set for jurisdictional contest except cases filed under Welfare and Institutions Code sections 300(d) or (e), the Court may, unless any party or attorney objects, send the parties to mediation before the contested hearing.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 136 of 200
Page 138¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(b) Mediation of post-jurisdictional contested hearings At the request of any party or the Court, and with consent of all parties, post-jurisdictional matters set for contested hearing may be referred to mediation. (Rule 5.63 revised effective 1/1/21)
Rule 5.64. Reciprocal Discovery By Order of the Supervising Judge, the discovery provisions and rules of California Rules of Court, Rule 5.546 pertaining to juvenile justice matters are equally applicable and reciprocal to the prosecution and defense. (Robert S., 9 Cal. App 4th 1417) (Rule 5.64 revised effective 1/1/21)
Rule 5.65. Disclosure of Victim or Witness Contact Information (a) Disclosure of victim or witness contact information All attorneys participating in juvenile justice proceedings shall comply fully with the limitations on disclosing victim or witness contact information prescribed by California Penal Code Section 1054.2. (See Robert S. v. Superior Court (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 1417, 1422). Attorneys may disclose victim or witness contact information, including but not limited to, addresses and telephone numbers, only in accordance with Penal Code Section 1054.2. Attorneys shall not disclose victim or witness contact information to a child who is the subject of a juvenile justice proceeding, or to the child’s parent or guardian, unless specifically permitted to do so by the Court after a hearing and a showing of good cause. The same concerns for victim or witness safety that prompted the enactment of Penal Code Section 1054.2 applies with equal force in juvenile justice proceedings (Cf., City of San Jose v. Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 47, 54). (b) Redaction of victim or witness contact information by district attorney The District Attorney shall fully redact all victim or witness contact information before providing police, arrest, and crime reports to a child, parent, or guardian, and shall simultaneously give notice that this information is being redacted. (See, California Rules of Court, Rule 5.546, subdivisions (b), (g), and (h).) The District Attorney shall provide unredacted copies of such reports to the attorney for a child, parent, or guardian, and the receiving defense attorney may use such reports in a manner consistent with Penal Code Section 1054.2(a). However, the receiving defense attorney shall redact all victim or witness contact information before providing police, arrest, and crime reports to the attorney’s clients. In situations where the child, parent or guardian is not represented by an attorney, the Court shall issue a protective order consistent with Penal Code Section 1054.2, subdivision (b). (c) Final order determining custody – modifications in new case filings Pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 5.700 and Welfare and Institutions Code Section 302(d), the Court may enter appropriate custody and visitation orders at the time
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 137 of 200
Page 139¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
the Juvenile Court terminates jurisdiction in a dependency case. To ensure there is in fact a significant change of circumstances to warrant modification of that order, when issuing the “Custody Order-Juvenile-Final Judgment-Visitation Order-Juvenile” (Judicial Council Form JV-200/JV-205), any request for order, application, order to show cause or motion to change custody or visitation filed within one year of the “Custody Order-Juvenile-Final Judgment/Visitation Order-Juvenile,” shall be assigned and determined by a juvenile bench officer. If possible, the matter shall be calendared before the juvenile bench officer who issued the final judgment and custody order. In such cases the juvenile bench officer shall sit as a family law bench officer and the matter shall be heard pursuant to the provisions of the Family Code.
(Rule 5.65 revised effective 1/1/21)
Rule 5.66. Notice Regarding Change in Placement for Dependents of the Court To ensure that proper notice is received by attorneys of any change in a child’s placement after the jurisdiction hearing:
(1) In non-emergency situations, Children and Family Services shall give notice to the
child’s counsel by close of the next business day following a decision to change a
child’s placement, including a change in address for respite, or a 7-day caretaker
notice. In no event in non-emergency situations, shall the child be moved from
placement without first providing child’s counsel a reasonable opportunity to put
the matter on the court calendar for court review.
(2) In non-emergency situations, Children and Family Services shall give at least ten
(10) calendar days’ notice before separating siblings placed together.
(3) Prior to removal of a child from one county to another, Children and Family
Services shall give at least fourteen (14) calendar days’ notice to all counsel,
unless emergency circumstances prevent such notice. In such emergency
circumstances, notice shall be given as soon as practicable but no later than close
of the next business day.
(4) Within 48 hours of receipt of information that a child is absent without leave
(“AWOL”), Children and Family Services shall notify all counsel.
(5) Within 48 hours of receipt of information that a child is or was recently hospitalized
for medical treatment, including psychiatric hospitalizations, Children and Family
Services shall notify all counsel and must provide the child’s counsel the name and
location of the hospital.
(6) Notice by Children and Family Services relating to the above changes in placement must be given in writing, which includes by facsimile or email. Notice to the child’s counsel shall include the child’s address, telephone number and name of the caregiver. (Rule 5.66 revised effective 1/1/21)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 138 of 200
Page 140¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 5.67. REPEALED
Rule 5.68. Notice to Caregiver The social worker shall ensure that notice is provided to the current caregivers of a dependent child, including foster parents, relative caregivers, pre-adoptive parents, or nonrelative extended family members of all status review and permanency review hearings as required under W&I Code 293. The social worker shall also provide the caregiver, at least thirty (30) calendar days before such hearings, with a Caregiver Information Form (Judicial Council Form JV-290) and instructions on how to complete and file the Instructions to Complete the Caregiver Information Form (Judicial Council Form JV-290-INFO) with the court. (Rule 5.68 revised effective 1/1/21)
Rule 5.69. Notice to Minor’s Counsel Regarding Subpoenas In the event that a social worker receives a subpoena or notice of a subpoena compelling the appearance for testimony of a minor subject to a dependency action, the social worker shall provide immediate notice to minor’s counsel in the dependency action. This notice shall be given at least five (5) business days before the date of the appearance of the minor child or within 48 hours of the social worker’s receipt of information of the subpoena, whichever occurs later. The social worker shall provide minor’s counsel with a copy of the subpoena. (Rule 5.69 revised effective 1/1/21)
Rule 5.70. Probation Reports Reporting Confirmed Information on AIDS and AIDS- Related Diseases Medically verified information that a juvenile or a defendant has AIDS, or AIDS-related diseases or is HIV positive, when reported to the Court, shall be reported in a confidential memorandum, attached only to the Court's copy of the Probation Report. These memoranda shall be marked “confidential.” And shall be maintained in a sealed envelope in the confidential section of the Court file and opened only by the bench officer presiding over the case. (Rule 5.70 revised effective 1/1/21)
Rule 5.71. Court Appointed Special Advocates Program Guidelines Only a representative of a CASA Program that complies with California Rules of Court, Rule 5.655 and Welfare and Institutions Code section 100 et seq. is eligible to be appointed to work with a minor in this county. (Rule 5.71 revised effective 1/1/19)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 139 of 200
Page 141¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 5.72. Submission, Copying, and Distribution of CASA Reports; Access to CASA Reports (a) Submission of CASA court report. CASA shall submit CASA court reports to the Court a minimum of five court days prior to the hearing for which the report was prepared. (b) Copying and Distribution of CASA court report. CASA shall copy the CASA court report and distribute it to attorneys of all parties to the case, County Counsel’s Office, and Children and Family Services a minimum of five court days prior to the hearing for which the report was prepared. (c) Access to CASA court report. Other than the attorneys for the parties (for example, parents, legal guardians, Children and Family Services), no other individuals or entities are entitled to receive a copy of the CASA court report, and only those individuals or entities named in subdivision (a) of section 827 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, and those individuals or entities named in section 827.10 of the Welfare and Institutions Code are permitted to access a CASA court report. (Rule 5.72 new effective 1/1/19)
Rule 5.73. Assignment of Transfer Hearings
When a motion to transfer a juvenile petition to adult court has been filed, the Juvenile Court Supervising Judge or the Presiding Judge may, in his or her discretion, designate a judicial officer not currently assigned to the Juvenile Court as an acting juvenile judicial officer, and may assign the transfer motion to that judge for hearing and decision. (Rule 5.73 new effective 7/1/20)
Rule 5.74. Service of JV-790 on Victim
In any Welfare & Institutions Code section 602 case in which the Court awarded victim restitution, the Court shall, before terminating the juvenile’s probation, execute for each victim still entitled to restitution a JV-790 restitution order converting any outstanding restitution award to a civil judgment. The District Attorney in all such cases shall:
(a) forthwith serve on each victim named in a JV-790 restitution order a certified copy of that victim’s restitution order; and (b) within 30 days of the date of the Order, file with the Court proof of service of the JV-790 restitution order served pursuant to subsection (A) or, if the victim’s contact information is not available, a statement of due diligence reflecting the District Attorney’s good faith efforts to locate the victim.
(Rule 5.74 new effective 1/1/20)
Rule 5.75. Presence at Juvenile Proceedings
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 140 of 200
Page 142¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(a) The Court recognizes that attorneys, probation officers, social workers and CASAs have a direct and legitimate interest in the work of the Court. The Court also considers it essential in the administration of the juvenile calendars to enforce and protect the confidential nature of the proceedings as prescribed by Welfare and Institutions Code section 676 and California Rule of Court 5.530(e). Accordingly, as to juvenile proceedings not open to the public pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 676, the following rule shall apply. Attorneys, probation officers, social workers and CASAs may be admitted to the courtroom during juvenile proceedings in which they are not themselves appearing subject to the following standards:
1) No attorney shall attend any hearing in a case in which the attorney has, or may
have, a conflict of interest. All attorneys shall ascertain, before attending any
hearing, that they do not have an actual or potential conflict in that case. In
particular, in WIC 602 cases, no member of the Office of the Public Defender
shall attend any hearing at which the Alternate Defender represents a minor; no
member of the Office of the Public Defender or Alternate Defender shall attend
any hearing at which conflicts counsel represents a minor; and no attorney shall
attend any hearing that involves a co-responsible of a minor represented by that
attorney.
2) All parties who observe a juvenile case in which they are not directly involved,
including attorneys, probation officers, social workers and CASAs, are bound by
the privacy and confidentiality rules governing juvenile proceedings, and may not
share or disclose to anyone anything seen or heard in court to anyone except if
the proceeding is one that under the law is open to the public.
3) All parties who remain in the courtroom to observe a juvenile case in which they
are not directly involved shall respect the Court and all parties involved in the
juvenile case. No party shall engage in any conduct that would disrupt the
proceedings and compromise the solemnity and integrity of the hearing, including
talking with others in the courtroom during proceedings.
(b) The Court may, in its discretion, exclude any person who violates any of these provisions from future hearings in which that person is not appearing.
(Rule 5.75 new effective 7/1/20)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 141 of 200
Page 143¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Title Six. Reserved
Title Seven. Probate Rules
Chapter 1. General Provisions
Rule 7.1. Probate Matters Matters governed by the Probate Code, except compromises for minors and incompetents arising from matters not governed by the Probate Code, shall be set for hearing in the department(s) designated by the Presiding Judge. These departments will be known collectively as the Probate Division. All Probate Division cases subject to this rule will be assigned to one judge for all purposes unless otherwise determined by the Presiding Judge for good cause. For information about Contra Costa Probate Court Calendars, go to the Probate Guidelines section at www.cc-courts.org. (Rule 7.1 revised effective 1/1/25)
Rule 7.2. Judicial Commitments Probate matters also include all matters arising under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act and any other judicial commitments, except Mentally Disordered Sex Offenders, and shall be heard in the Probate Division at time and date as established. (Rule 7.2 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.3. Trust Fund Withdrawals An application for an order authorizing withdrawals of funds on deposit for the benefit of a minor shall be made by completing a form provided by the clerk of the Court for this purpose. The application shall be signed under penalty of perjury and shall set forth the status of the account, the purpose for which the funds are to be withdrawn, the need for the withdrawal, and the reasons why the parents or parent are unable to provide the needed funds. If the funds are held in a probate guardianship, or are blocked by other order of the probate court, the application for release of funds shall be submitted to the Probate Division. If the funds are blocked by order of another department, and there is no probate guardianship of the estate, the application shall be submitted to the Presiding Judge. (Rule 7.3 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.4. Probate Rules All petitions, motions, and orders to show cause regarding probate matters shall be set in the Probate Division. Also see Local Rule 3.41. Except for matters arising under Rule 7.2, all such matters are assigned for all purposes to a judge assigned to the Probate Division. A challenge to the assigned judge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 170.6 must be made in accordance with the time requirements set forth in that section. Upon acceptance of a proper challenge under Code of Civil Procedure Section 170.6, the case will be reassigned by the
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 142 of 200
Page 144¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Presiding Judge. Nothing in this rule limits the discretion of the Supervising Judge of the Probate Division to assign the trial or hearing of any matter to another department. (Rule 7.4 revised effective 1/1/23)
Rule 7.5. Reporting of Court Reporting in Probate (a) Unavailability of court reporters in Probate matters Except as otherwise provided by Local Rule 2.53, official court reporters employed by the court are unavailable in the Probate Division effective January 1, 2013 and until further notice. Consult the Notice of Availability on the court’s website for current status and any changes. (Rule 7.5(a) revised effective 1/1/19) (b) Procurement of private court reporters Except as otherwise provided by Local Rule 2.53, any party who desires a verbatim record of the proceedings from which a transcript can later be prepared may procure the services of an outside private certified court reporter pro tempore to report any scheduled hearing or trial (see California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956). (Rule 7.5(b) revised effective 1/1/19) (c) Procurement process for court reporter services Parties electing to procure the services of an outside reporter must comply with Local Rule 2.52. (Rule 7.5(c) revised effective 1/1/19) (d) Fee not charged for unavailable court reporter Pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956(d), if a party arranges and pays for the attendance of a certified shorthand reporter at a hearing in a probate case because of the unavailability of the services of an official court reporter, none of the parties will be charged the reporter’s attendance fee provided for in Government Code Sections 68086(a)(1)(A) or (B). (e) Attendance fee If court reporters become available and in the Court’s discretion are provided for any civil hearings, or if a court reporter is provided pursuant to Local Rule 2.53, any party who has not been granted a fee waiver under Government Code section 68631 et seq. will be required to pay the applicable reporter attendance fee provided for in Government Code sections 68086(a)(1)(A) or (B). (Rule 7.5(e) revised effective 1/1/19) (f) Transcript costs Parties shall be responsible for all transcript costs pursuant to Government Code Section 69953.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 143 of 200
Page 145¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(Rule 7.5 revised effective 1/1/19)
Chapter 2. Probate Court Proceedings
Rule 7.50. Probate Calendar (a) Appropriate placement on Probate calendar Probate calendars are arranged to facilitate efficient and effective resolution of matters before the Court. For information about probate calendars go to the Probate Guidelines section at www.cc-courts.org. (Rule 7.50(a) revised effective 1/1/16) (b) Calendar Procedures Parties may request, but are not guaranteed, any particular date for calendaring their matter. For information about probate calendaring, go to the Probate Guidelines section at www.cc-courts.org. Parties who want exceptions to application of the calendar procedures as determined by the clerk may request the Probate Examiners make accommodations to the calendaring procedure—and may make verified application to the Probate Division. (Rule 7.50(b) revised effective 1/1/16) (Rule 7.50 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.51. Contested Matters (a) Scheduling issue conference The Probate Division will manage probate matters until they are ready for trial and will then schedule the matter for an issue conference as otherwise described in Local Rule 3.11. Also see Local Rule 7.1. (b) Alternative Dispute Resolution programs for Probate matters It is the policy of the Court to encourage the parties in all cases to consider the use of appropriate alternative dispute resolution options as a means of resolving their disputes without trial. The court finds that it is in the best interests of all parties that they participate in alternatives to traditional litigation, such as arbitration, mediation, neutral evaluation, and voluntary settlement conferences. Therefore, the court may refer cases to an appropriate form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) before they are set for trial, unless there is good cause to dispense with an alternative dispute resolution process. (See Title 3, Chapter 5). (Rule 7.51(b) revised effective 1/1/17)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 144 of 200
Page 146¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(c) Rules for alternative dispute resolution processes other than judicial arbitration (1) Selection of provider. The parties may choose any ADR provider they wish, whether or not that provider is on the list described in the following section of these rules.
(2) Good faith participation is required. All parties to an alternative dispute resolution
process must participate in the process in good faith.
(3) Personal appearance required. In conducting a session, the ADR provider should
require the attendance of persons with full authority to resolve the dispute. The
provider should only permit telephone appearances if good cause to waive
personal appearance was shown in a timely manner prior to the session.
(4) Cost of the alternative dispute resolution process. Unless the ADR provider's fees
and expenses have been ordered by the court, the parties and the provider must
agree on the fees and expenses. The fees and expenses of the provider will be
borne by the parties equally, unless they agree otherwise.
(Rule 7.51(c) new effective 1/1/17)
(d) Alternative dispute resolution provider list The court maintains a panel list of alternative dispute resolution providers to assist parties and counsel in obtaining access to experienced and affordable alternative dispute resolution services. The panel list includes providers in the areas of mediation, neutral case evaluation, private arbitration, and judicial arbitration. The panel list, including names, qualifications, services provided and fees charged, will be posted on the court's website and will be available in the office of the ADR program administrator. (Rule 7.51(d) new effective 1/1/17) (Rule 7.51 revised effective 1/1/17)
Rule 7.52. Appearances (a) Appearances in uncontested matters Appearances at the first hearing in uncontested matters are not normally required. Unless otherwise ordered, appearances are required in the following matters:
(1) If a person has been cited or ordered to appear at a hearing, appearances by both
the party and the party’s attorney of record at that hearing are required. If the
citation or order was requested by a party, then the attorney for the requesting
party, or the requesting party if in pro per, is also required to appear.
(2) If the tentative ruling states “Appearances required” then appearances are required
by the proponent of the matters on calendar, and all who have responded so the
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 145 of 200
Page 147¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Court can make appropriate case management orders (e.g. discovery deadlines,
or trial setting). Attorneys of record may appear for their clients.
(Rule 7.52(a)(2) revised effective 1/1/13)
(3) The proponent and all who have responded must attend at all subsequent hearings
related to case management orders (e.g. discovery deadlines, or trial setting) if a
matter has been continued previously, or the parties are advised otherwise by the
tentative ruling. Attorneys of record may appear for their clients.
(Rule 7.52(a)(3) revised effective 1/1/16)
(b) Sanctions for failure to appear A failure to appear as required may result in sanctions pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 177.5. (Rule 7.52 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.53. Verifications Verifications standards: (1) The attorney who represents a ward or conservatee may verify pleadings filed on behalf of the ward or conservatee.
(2) An attorney’s verification on behalf of a client may be sufficient for pleading purposes, but unless the verification provides that the facts are within the personal knowledge of the attorney, then this does not provide the evidentiary support necessary for a ruling.
(3) An attorney’s declaration as to facts or attachments which were allegedly intended to be included in a statement previously verified by the attorney’s client is ineffective. (Revised effective 1/1/03 per Code of Civil Procedure Section 2015 and California Rules of Court, Rule 7.103) (Rule 7.53 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.54. Submission of Proposed Order Before Date of Hearing Except in the case of confirmations of sales, orders must be submitted to the Probate Division at least three (3) court days in advance of the scheduled hearing date. The hearing date shall be stated in the order. The proposed order shall be prepared on the assumption the petition will be granted, including requested fees. Orders submitted later will be reviewed and processed after the hearing and will generally be available the morning after the hearing. (Rule 7.54 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.55. Responses to Tentative Rulings Tentative rulings or calendar notes are available before the calendar hearings in the Probate Guidelines section at www.cc-courts.org. In order to be considered, responses to tentative rulings
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 146 of 200
Page 148¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
must be filed no later than the close of business, two (2) court days before the hearing and endorsed filed copies delivered to the Probate Examiner. (Rule 7.55 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.56. Continuances to Cure Defective Pleadings or Procedures (a) Continuance of first hearing The first hearing on a matter may be continued to enable the petitioner to correct defective pleadings or procedures identified in the tentative ruling. The continuance can be made by telephone request to the clerk, or by the Court on its own motion, even if no appearance or request for continuance is made. (b) Continuance or dismissal of matter After the first hearing, the matter may be dismissed unless the petitioner shows good cause for a further continuance, by a filed declaration or an appearance at the hearing. Continuances following the first hearing may not be secured by requesting a continuance from the clerk. (c) Renotice of dropped matters A matter once dropped must be renoticed after it has been placed back on calendar. A matter dismissed must be refiled and renoticed. (Rule 7.56(c) revised effective 1/1/01) (Rule 7.56 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.57. JUDICIAL COUNCIL FORMS. REPEALED (See CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 7.101)
Rule 7.58. Discretion to Waive The Court for good cause may waive the application of any Local Court Rule or Probate Guideline in an individual case. (Rule 7.58 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.59. Fees (a) Fee guidelines The Probate Division may, from time to time, publish fee guidelines for the assistance of counsel and others. For information about Contra Costa Probate Court Fees and Costs Guidelines, go to the Probate Guidelines section at www.cc-courts.org. (Rule 7.59(a) revised effective 1/1/16)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 147 of 200
Page 149¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(b) Fee petitions for fiduciaries Fee petitions for fiduciaries and their attorneys, as well as for others seeking payment from an estate in a probate department case (e.g., court-appointed counsel for conservatees with an adequate estate) are governed by a common set of guidelines but are subject to somewhat different considerations depending on the type of case in which they are presented. The common guidelines, dealing with format and acceptable rates and reimbursable costs, are contained in Chapter 12 below, and in the Contra Costa Probate Court Fees and Costs Guidelines at www.cc-courts.org. (Rule 7.59(b) revised effective 1/1/16) (c) Evaluation of fee petitions Other considerations for evaluating fee petitions in more specific contexts are referenced in Local Rules 7.306 (probate administration), 7.426 (probate guardianships and conservatorships, including LPS conservatorships), and 7.450 (trusts). Also, see Local Rules 7.61 and 7.65 for additional instructions applying to all fee petitions. (Rule 7.59(c) revised effective 1/1/23) (Rule 7.59 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.60. Record Title (a) Disclosure of title of record If a Title of Record for a decedent’s interest in an asset is different than the decedent’s interest is alleged to be in a petition determining the characterization or disposition of the decedent’s interest, the petition shall disclose to the Court what the Title of Record is for the asset. For example, if a Spousal Property Petition is filed seeking determination that community property realty passed to the surviving spouse, and the title of record for the property to the property is held as “joint tenants with right of survivorship” then that fact shall be disclosed. (b) Community property Community property held in joint tenancy title will be treated as community property unless there was a formal and express transmutation from community property. (Rule 7.60 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.61. Court Ordered Fees for Fiduciaries and Attorneys (a) No attorney for a guardian, guardian ad litem, minor, conservator, conservatee or personal representative shall request or accept any compensation from the estate (whether or not subject to court supervision) of the ward, incapacitated person, conservatee or decedent’s estate without prior court order. This does not require prior court approval of payments received from trusts or other persons.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 148 of 200
Page 150¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(b) The requirement of prior court approval applies to any attorney for any of the specified fiduciaries who is representing the fiduciary in any other civil action. For example, if a creditor files suit against a decedent’s estate, and the personal representative hires separate counsel to defend the suit, prior court approval is required before payment of any fees to the separate counsel.
(c) In awarding or allowing reimbursement for compensation in situations described in paragraph (a), the Court is neither bound by (1) the terms of any attorney fee agreement executed without prior court approval in the proceeding nor (2) any amounts that have been paid previously. (See California Rules of Court, 7.753, 7.754, 7.755.) For information about Contra Costa Probate Court Fees and Costs Guidelines, go to the Probate Guidelines section at www.cc-courts.org. (Rule 7.61 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.62. Factual Allegations Declarations which merely recite or incorporate reference to code sections do not provide an evidentiary basis for action by the Court absent evidence that the declarant is an attorney or otherwise has sufficient expertise to express a credible opinion as to the operation of the code section. Absent such expertise, facts evidencing necessary compliance with a code section shall be stated in the pleadings. (Rule 7.62 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.63. Guardian ad Litem (a) Representation of guardian ad litem A guardian ad litem must be an attorney or must be represented by an attorney. (b) Waiver of beneficiary rights A guardian ad litem may not waive or disclaim any substantive rights of the beneficiary without prior approval by the Court. (Rule 7.63 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.64. Special Notice to Attorneys and Clients A request for special notice by an attorney, absent an express statement otherwise, does not constitute a waiver of the notices required to be sent to the attorney’s client under Probate Code Section 1214. (Rule 7.64 revised effective 1/1/15)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 149 of 200
Page 151¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 7.65. Coordination of Fee Petitions with Accountings (a) Filing fee petitions Although the Probate Code does not prohibit fee petitions from being filed separately from accountings, the Court prefers to determine the amount of fees for fiduciaries and their attorneys (and if possible, for other attorneys who need prior approval for payment in the case) at the time the fiduciary’s accounts are reviewed. (b) Filing requirements A petition before an accounting may be filed to determine compensation as long as the Inventory and Appraisal has been filed showing sufficient assets to pay the requested compensation (this condition does not apply to cases, such as trust administration, where an Inventory and Appraisal is not required to be filed). However, the fiduciary and counsel will not be allowed fees or costs from the estate for bringing such early petition, unless good cause for allowing fees before an accounting is shown. (c) Fee petition clarification A petition for appointment of a fiduciary that includes a request for periodic payment of fees on account under Probate Code §2643 or §10832 shall not be deemed a “fee petition” under this rule. (d) Trust administrations This rule does not apply to trust administrations where court-approved accountings are not required. (Rule 7.65(d) new effective 1/1/13) (e) Fee petition by counsel A fee petition by counsel for a proposed conservatee or ward requesting less than $5,000 may be submitted for decision during ex parte hours, apart from an accounting, with fifteen (15) calendar days’ notice to all persons who would be entitled to notice of the hearing if such petition were set on the regular calendar. For information about Contra Costa Probate Court Fees and Costs Guidelines, go to the Probate Guidelines section at www.cc-courts.org. (Rule 7.65(e) new effective 1/1/16) (Rule 7.65 revised effective 1/1/16)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 150 of 200
Page 152¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Chapter 3. Petitions, Orders and Notices
Rule 7.100. Titles for Petitions and Orders [Repealed 1/1/03]
Rule 7.101. Material to be Included in Formal Rulings Formal orders, judgment and decrees shall be drawn so that their full effect may be determined without reference to the petition on which they are based. As necessary for this purpose, documents shall be attached to, and referenced in, the order, judgment or decree, instead of referring to the other document by reference. All probate orders, judgments or decrees shall set forth all matters actually passed on by the Court, giving the relief granted, the names of the persons affected, and the full legal description of any real property (including Assessor’s Parcel Number), or the amounts of money affected. (Rule 7.101 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.102. Written Response An objection or other written response to moving papers will be deemed a waiver of further notice as to those papers. (Rule 7.102 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.103. Reserved. [REPEALED 1/1/03]
Rule 7.104. Applications for Ex Parte Orders (a) Ex parte applications Applications for ex parte orders must be accompanied by a separate order complete in itself. It is not sufficient for such an order to provide merely that the application has been granted, or that the sale of property set forth in the petition has been approved.
An application for an ex parte order must be verified and must contain sufficient evidentiary facts to justify issuing the order. Conclusions or statements of ultimate facts are not sufficient and a foundation should be shown for the petitioner’s personal knowledge.
(b) Notice requirements Since no testimony is taken in connection with ex parte petitions, the application must contain sufficient facts to justify granting the ex parte order. Petitioner must notify all interested or opposing parties by fax, email, or telephone no later than 10:00 a.m. on the day before the scheduled hearing as provided by CRC, Rule 3.1203 and CRC, Rule 3.1204. A copy of a declaration regarding notice in compliance with CRC, Rule 3.1204 must be delivered to the Probate Department at the time the papers are presented. Orders dispensing with notice must be supported by a declaration setting forth the exceptional circumstances that justify dispensing with notice. REPEALED IN PART (see California Rules of Court Rule 3.1203, Rule 3.1204, and Rule 7.55 & Probate Code 1202)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 151 of 200
Page 153¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(Rule 7.104(b) revised effective 1/1/23)
(Rule 7.104 revised effective 1/1/17)
Rule 7.105. Petitions for Family Allowance (a) Income and expense requirement A petition for the family allowance under Probate Code Section 6540 et seq. must include a detailed statement of proposed recipient’s income and expenses. (b) Notice requirement for petitions for family allowance A petition for family allowance, if made before the filing of the Inventory and Appraisal ordinarily may be presented ex parte. However, if the petitioner is someone other than the executor or there is a dispute as evidenced by papers on file in the proceedings, or there is a request for special notice, then all other parties must be notified in person or by telephone at least twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the time and place where the application for the ex parte order will be made. The petition must be presented by the attorney or unrepresented party requesting the ex parte order. Ordinarily, the order will be made for a period commencing with the date of death and continuing until the inventory is filed, but not to exceed six (6) months. If the order will be opposed, call the Probate Division ahead of time to make a specific appointment with the Court. (c) Application and notification after personal representative qualified If the application is made more than six (6) months after the personal representative has qualified, it shall be noticed and placed on the calendar. (d) Time period for subsequent orders Subsequent orders will be limited to a definite period, usually not to exceed twelve (12) months duration. It is the policy of this Court not to make orders for family allowance for an unlimited period. (Rule 7.105 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.106. Bond on Petitions for Authority to Borrow Money Petitions for authority to borrow money shall set forth the amount of bond in force and the amount of loan proceeds eligible to be covered by bond. If no additional bond is required, or if bond is waived, that fact shall be alleged. (Rule 7.106 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.107. Nunc Pro Tunc Orders Correcting Clerical Errors (a) Correction of error on order If, through inadvertence, the signed order, judgment or decree fails to state the ruling actually made by the Court, or through some writer’s error portions of the order, judgment
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 152 of 200
Page 154¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
or decree are incorrect, the Court will make a nunc pro tunc, judgment or decree order
correcting the mistake upon declaration detailing the defect. If the modification to the
order is the result of an error by an attorney or party, an ex parte application is required.
If modification is the result of court error, a declaration in support of the amended order is
sufficient.
(b) Nunc pro tunc order A nunc pro tunc order, judgment or decree must take the form of a complete amended order, judgment or decree. The previously signed order must be attached to the ex parte application or declaration. (Rule 7.107 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.108. General Notice Requirements Counsel are reminded that the notice requirements in the Probate Code vary greatly. No set pattern may be discerned. The specific requirements of the Code (i.e., posting, mailing, publication, personal service, etc.) must be checked for every petition filed. (Rule 7.108 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.109. Probate Hearing Once Noticed Cannot be Advanced When a hearing on a probate matter has been noticed, or when it has been noticed and then continued to a definite date, the matter cannot be heard before the date set, except by Court order and new notice. (Rule 7.109 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.110. Orders, etc., to be Complete A judgment, decree or order shall be complete in itself, with attachments as necessary to avoid incorporating other documents by reference. (Rule 7.110 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.111. Accounts and Reports (a) Accountings submitted for court approval Accountings submitted for court approval shall comply with Probate Code Section 1060 et seq. (b) Statement of bond in accounting report The report accompanying an accounting shall include a statement regarding the bond. This shall include the following:
(1) The amount of the currently posted bond.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 153 of 200
Page 155¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(2) If no bond is posted, a statement of why no bond was required (e.g., “At the time
of appointment, there were no assets subject to disposition by the fiduciary” or
“Bond was waived in the will”).
(3) If bond is required, the report shall state:
(A) the current value of all personal property subject to the petitioner’s control;
(B) the amount of the estimated annual income for the next year;
(C) the fair market value, less encumbrances, of any real property which the
fiduciary can sell without prior court order; and
(D) the amount of any public benefits regarding accounts for guardianships and
conservatorships being received by or for the benefit of the ward or
conservatee, including the identity of the person receiving the benefit.
(Rule 7.111 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.112. Petitions to Show who is Entitled to Notice All petitions shall identify the names, addresses, and relationships of all persons entitled to notice. (Rule 7.112 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.113. Identity or Whereabouts Unknown [Repealed 1/1/03] (see California Rules of Court, Rule 7.52)
Rule 7.114. Notice Regarding Interests of Deceased Persons [Repealed 1/1/03] (see California Rules of Court, Rule 7.51(e))
Chapter 4. Appointment of Executors and Administrators
Rule 7.150. Notice re: Special Letters Petitions for letters of special administration will not be granted without twenty-four (24) hour (oral or written) notice to the surviving spouse or domestic partner as defined in Probate Code Section 1894, to the person nominated as executor, and to any other person whom the Court determines to be equitably entitled to notice. In making the appointment, preference is given to the person entitled to Letters Testamentary or of Administration, but if it appears that a bona fide contest exists between these persons, the Court will consider the advisability of appointing a neutral person or corporation as Special Administrator, upon the filing of a proper petition. (Rule 7.150 revised effective 1/1/15)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 154 of 200
Page 156¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 7.151. Petitions for Probate of Will and for Letters Testamentary; for Letters of Administration; or for Letters of Administration with Will Annexed (a) Photographic copy of holographic instrument When a holographic instrument is offered for probate, a photocopy of the instrument must be accompanied by an exact typewritten copy of the instrument, reproducing the instrument line by line and showing any words crossed out. Where an instrument written in a foreign language is offered, it must be accompanied by a copy translated into English by a Court certified translator. (b) Name of predeceased beneficiary If a named beneficiary predeceased the decedent or did not survive the designated survival period, that fact must be stated in Attachment 8 of the Petition. (c) Requirement of personal representative form Confidential Statement of Birth Date and Driver’s License Number (Judicial Council Form DE-147S) is not required. (d) Name of spouse or deceased person on petition If Attachment 8 includes a spouse or any other person who is deceased as of the date of the petition, the petition shall state that person’s date of death. The Court needs to know whether the person predeceased or survived the decedent. (Rule 7.151(a)-(d) revised effective 1/1/15) (e) Proof of Service of Notice of Petition to Administer Estate A copy of the petition must be served with the initial Notice of Petition to Administer Estate. A copy of the petition should not be published with the Notice. (Rule 7.151(e) new effective 1/1/15) (Rule 7.151 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.152. Notice (a) The following persons are entitled to NOTICE (see Probate Code § 8110): (1) Heirs of the Decedent: Whether or not a decedent died with a will, the petition must contain the names and relationships of all of the decedent’s heirs-at-law. An heir - at-law is any person who would be entitled to distribution of a part of the decedent’s estate (including distribution by virtue of Probate Code Section 6402.5 if the decedent had a predeceased spouse) if the decedent died intestate (without leaving a will);
(2) Beneficiaries Named in the Will: This includes all named contingent beneficiaries
who may be entitled to share in the estate, and also includes persons provided for
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 155 of 200
Page 157¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
in the Will but whose gifts have been revoked by a subsequent modification to the
will;
(3) Deceased Heir or Beneficiary (See California Rules of Court, Rule 7.51(e)); if heir
or beneficiary died before decedent, see also Probate Code § 21110. [REPEALED
1/1/03] (See California Rules of Court, Rule 7.51(e));
(4) Trustee Nominee. Any nominated trustee of a trust created by the will;
(5) Beneficiaries of Testamentary Trusts. The terms “beneficiaries named in the Will”
and “named contingent beneficiaries” used above include beneficiaries named in
testamentary trusts. It is not adequate merely to give notice to the trustee of a trust
where beneficiaries or contingent beneficiaries are named in testamentary trusts;
(6) Trustees of Inter-Vivos Trusts who will receive “pour over” gifts from the decedent’s
estate. Item 8 on the Petition For Probate (Judicial Council Form DE-111) requires
the petitioner to list “all beneficiaries of a trust named in the decedent’s will or any
codicil in which the trustee and personal representative are the same person.”
Since use of applicable Judicial Council forms is mandatory and the purpose of
Item 8 is to identify persons entitled to receive notice of the petition, the Probate
Division will require notice to be given to present and contingent beneficiaries of
trusts where the trustee is a beneficiary of the will and the trustee is identical to the
proposed personal representative;
(7) Any non-petitioning Executor, including alternate executors named in the Will; and
(8) The California Attorney General, where there is a charitable trust involved (Probate Code Section 8111). (b) Method of giving various notices (1) Unknown Address. If the address of an heir or beneficiary is unknown, the Court requires a declaration stating specifically what efforts were made to locate such heir or beneficiary before the Court will dispense with notice or prescribe an alternate form of notice. See Probate Code Section 1212 and Code of Civil Procedure Section 413.30 as to what efforts are necessary. In general, these efforts shall include inquiry of relatives, friends, acquaintances, and employers and investigation of appropriate city and telephone directories, and the real and personal property index at the County Assessor’s Office of the county of last known residence of the missing heir or beneficiary. REPEALED IN PART (see California Rules of Court, Rule 7.51(d)). (2) Minors. See Probate Code Section 1460.1 and California Rules of Court, Rule 7.51(d). (c) Notice by mail - by whom given If a Probate Code Section requires the clerk to “cause notice of the hearing to be mailed,” the clerk fulfills this function by requiring counsel to do the mailing. Therefore, counsel is charged with this duty.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 156 of 200
Page 158¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(Rule 7.152 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.153. Requirements of Publication for Notice of Petition to Administer Estate (a) Publication and mailing of notice of petition to administer estate The publication and mailing of Notice of Petition to Administer Estate under Probate Code Section 8120 is sufficient to include all instruments which are offered for probate filed with, and specifically referred to in the Petition for which notice is given. Any other Wills or supplement to a Will not specifically mentioned in the Petition must be presented to the Court in an amended or second Petition and a new Notice of Petition to Administer Estate must be published and mailed. (Probate Code Sections 8110 and 8120). (b) Petitioner’s responsibility to publish petition to administer estate It is the responsibility of the petitioner to arrange for publication. The County Clerk does not have this responsibility. (Rule 7.153 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.154. Court Discretion Regarding Bond Executors nominated to serve without bond may nevertheless be required to post such bond as the Court may require. If the nominated executor is a nonresident of California, the Court will require bond as though the will had not waived bond. If all beneficiaries or heirs waive bond, or if one of multiple personal representatives is a California resident, the Court will consider reducing the bonding requirement for non-resident personal representatives to no less than $20,000 to provide protection for creditors. A declaration or attachment to the petition setting forth in detail the anticipated liabilities of the decedent and claims against the estate will be necessary to help the court determine the proper amount. FORMER SUBDIVISION B REPEALED IN PART (See California Rules of Court, Rule 7.204) (Rule 7.154 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.155. Continuance to Permit Filing of Contest When a petition for the probate of a Will is called for hearing, if an interested person appears and orally objects and declares that he or she desires to file a written contest, the Court will continue the hearing with the understanding that if a contest is not actually on file at the new hearing date, the hearing will nevertheless proceed as though there were no contest. (Rule 7.155 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.156. Multiple Representatives When multiple personal representatives are appointed, the clerk will not issue letters to less than all of them or separately to any of them, unless the order specifies otherwise. (Rule 7.156 revised effective 1/1/15)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 157 of 200
Page 159¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Chapter 5. Creditors’ Claims
Rule 7.200. Nature and Form of Claims (a) Claim vs. expense of administration (1) The Court will not approve “creditors’ claims” which represent obligations of the estate arising after the death of the decedent (except reasonable funeral expense). Such expenses are properly expenses of administration, not creditor’s claims, and may be included for approval in the account or report.
(2) The Court will not approve “creditors’ claims” which are requests for
reimbursement by the person who paid what may otherwise have been a creditor
claim. These are claims for equitable subrogation, and may be included for
approval in the account or report.
(b) Form of creditor’s claims Creditor’s claims will be liberally construed in favor of their sufficiency. (Rule 7.200 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.201. Claims Filed with Clerk and Mailed to Personal Representative [Repealed 1/1/03] (see California Rules of Court, Rule 7.401; Probate Code 9150)
Rule 7.202. Claims of Personal Representatives and Attorneys (a) Creditor’s claim by personal representative A creditor’s claim of the personal representative or attorney shall be noted as such. Such a claim must be processed as provided in Probate Code Section 9252 notwithstanding authority to act under the IAEA. Where there is more than one personal representative, a creditor’s claim submitted by one of the personal representatives must be approved by the other(s) before submission to the Court for approval. (b) Hearing on claim of personal representatives or attorney Unless a claim by a personal representative or attorney for the personal representative appears reasonable, and any persons requesting special notice have waived the notice as to the claim, a hearing shall be held as set forth in Probate Code Section 9252(a) and notice given to all persons entitled to such notice, including all residuary beneficiaries, together with a copy of the claim, pursuant to Probate Code Section 1220. (Rule 7.202(b) revised effective 1/1/15) (Rule 7.202 revised effective 1/1/15)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 158 of 200
Page 160¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 7.203. Funeral Claims An unusually large claim for the decedent’s funeral and/or interment is a questionable claim and may be set for hearing pursuant to the procedure set forth in Local Court Rule 7.202(b) above. Counsel is advised to review the case of Estate of Malgor (1947) 77 Cal.App.2d 535, 176 P2d 66. Where appropriate, the personal representative shall either include facts in the petition or file a separate declaration to justify an unusually large expenditure for funeral expenses by reason of the value of the estate and/or the standard of living adopted by the decedent during his lifetime. Interest will be allowed on creditor’s claims for funeral expenses only as made payable by Health and Safety Code Section 7101. (Rule 7.203 revised effective 1/1/15)
Chapter 6. Sales
Rule 7.250. Sales of Real Property not under IAEA (Rule 7.250 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.251. Return of Private Sale (a) Cash deposit required for purchases to be confirmed by court Bids for the purchase of real property, when required to be returned to the Court for confirmation, must be accompanied by a minimum deposit of ten percent (10%) of the purchase price at the time of hearing unless the buyers’ committed loan proceeds exceed ninety percent (90%) of the purchase price, in which event the minimum deposit shall be the difference between the committed loan proceeds and the purchase price. (b) REPEALED IN PART (See California Rules of Court, Rule 7.451) (Rule 7.251(b) revised effective 1/1/03)
(c) Court approval of secured junior deed of trust The Court will approve the taking of a promissory note secured by a junior deed of trust upon a showing that it serves the best interests of the estate. (d) Application of statutory formula re: overbid The Court must consider not only whether the bid is arithmetically the highest, but also whether it is in the best interest of the estate. Counsel for the parties involved shall be prepared with factual information that will aid the Court in making this determination. (e) REPEALED IN PART (See California Rules of Court, Rule 7.452) (Rule 7.251(e) revised effective 1/1/03) (Rule 7.251 revised effective 1/1/15)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 159 of 200
Page 161¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 7.252. Broker’s Commissions (a) Improved property Upon the confirmation of sale of improved real property, the Court will ordinarily allow a broker’s commission not to exceed six percent (6%). If a greater amount is requested, the petition to confirm sale must be accompanied by written declarations setting forth the advantages to the estate in allowing a larger percentage as commission. (b) Unimproved property Upon the confirmation of sale of unimproved real property, the Court will ordinarily allow a broker’s commission not to exceed ten percent (10%). The Court will determine the kind of property which constitutes unimproved property in each case and may request counsel to file declarations setting forth relevant facts in the determination of what is “unimproved” real property. (c) Order must show commission allocation The order confirming sale must show the total commissions allowed and any allocation agreed upon between the brokers. (Rule 7.252 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.253. Broker’s Commissions in Overbid Situation See Probate Code Section 10160 et seq. A chart demonstrating the division of the broker commission when estate property is sold subject to Court confirmation is available in the Probate Guidelines section at www.cc-courts.org. (Rule 7.253 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.254 — Exclusive Listings for Sale of Property (Probate Code Section 10150(c)¶
Rule 7.254. Exclusive Listings for Sale of Property (Probate Code Section 10150(c) [Repealed 1/1/03] (see California Rules of Court, Rule 7.453)
Rule 7.255. Condominiums, Community or Cooperative Apartments A condominium is an interest in real property and must be sold as such, unless it is held as a limited partnership. A cooperative apartment is also real property and must be sold as such. (Rule 7.255 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.256. Purchase of Estate Property by Personal Representative or His or Her Attorney The purchase of estate property by the personal representative or by the personal representative’s attorney is permitted only as set forth in Probate Code Sections 9881-9885. The Court will approve such a purchase with the consent of all residual beneficiaries by a writing filed with the Court. (Rule 7.256 revised effective 1/1/15)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 160 of 200
Page 162¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 7.257. Tangible Personal Property (a) Perishable or depreciating property Perishable or depreciating property in an estate shall be disposed of promptly. The personal representative may be held accountable for the value of the property if there has been an unreasonable delay in disposing of such property. Such property may be sold without notice. See Probate Code Sections 10252 and 10259(a)(1). If counsel wishes Court confirmation of such sales (10259c), counsel shall use the form Ex Parte Petition for Approval of Sale of Personal Property and Order (Judicial Council Form DE-275). (b) Non-perishable or non-depreciating property With the exceptions set forth in Probate Code Sections 10252(a), (b) and (d), non- perishable or non-depreciating personal property may be sold subject to Court confirmation at either public auction or at private sale, after giving notice as set forth in Probate Code Section 10250, et seq. The time for giving notice may be shortened in the discretion of the Court. (Rule 7.257 revised effective 1/1/15)
Chapter 7. Accounts, Fees and Petition for Distribution
Rule 7.300. Notice of Petition for Distribution At least fifteen (15) calendar days before the hearing of the petition, notice of the hearing must be served upon each named beneficiary whose interest is affected by the petition and to the heirs of the decedent in intestate estates. Also see Probate Code Section 1220. Notice shall also be given to: a) the trustee of any intervivos trust to which the estate pours over; b) to trust beneficiaries if required under Probate Code Section 1208; c) to the trustee of any testamentary trust. (Rule 7.300 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.301. Property to be Distributed must be Listed (a) Description of property The petition for distribution must list and describe in detail all property to be distributed, either in the body of the petition or in the prayer, or by a schedule in the accounting, and incorporated in the petition by reference. This includes a statement of the amount of cash on hand. A description by reference to the inventory is not acceptable. See also requirements in Probate Code Section 1064. (b) Tracing survivor of interstate decedent If an intestate decedent who survived his or her spouse leaves no issue, the applicability of Probate Code Section 6402.5 must be alleged and the necessary tracing must be carried out as far as is possible.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 161 of 200
Page 163¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(Rule 7.301(b) revised effective 1/1/03)
(Rule 7.301 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.302. Form of Accounting The general guidelines for accountings are now set forth in Probate Code Section 1060 et seq. (Rule 7.302 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.303. Waiver of Account (a) Waiver by residuary beneficiaries The waiver of account by the residuary beneficiaries alone is sufficient, even though there may be specific legatees and devisees, if the petition for distribution enumerates the specific bequests and devises, shows that there are sufficient assets to satisfy such bequests and devises, and prays that they be distributed. REPEALED IN PART (See California Rules of Court, Rule 7.550 for information required in reports on waiver of account) (Rule 7.303(a) revised effective 1/1/15) (b) Distribution from testamentary trust When property is being distributed in a testamentary trust, an account may be waived by the trustee and all present beneficiaries of the trust. The beneficiaries must all be ascertained, adult and competent, or represented by a guardian, conservator or guardian ad litem, who must execute the waiver. (Rule 7.303(b) revised effective 1/1/15) (Rule 7.303 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.304. Statutory Fees and Allowable Costs [Repealed 1/1/03] (see California Rules of Court, Rule 7.705)
Rule 7.305. Inheritance by Surviving Spouse Formal probate of community, quasi-community, or separate property passing or confirmed to a surviving spouse in a decedent’s estate pursuant to Probate Code Section 13502 must be supported by a timely written election expressing acknowledgment of a consideration of the alternative procedures available pursuant to Probate Code Section 13650. Written elections pursuant to Probate Code Section 13502 shall contain an express acknowledgment that the inclusion of property passing to or belonging to the surviving spouse in the probate estate could result in additional appraisal fees, commissions, and attorney fees. (Rule 7.305 revised effective 1/1/15)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 162 of 200
Page 164¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 7.306. Extraordinary Fees Petitions for compensation for extraordinary services under Probate Code § 10811 shall be supported by a declaration, complying with Contra Costa Probate Court Guidelines from each individual requesting approval of extraordinary fees. For information about Contra Costa Probate Court Fees and Costs Guidelines, go to the Probate Guidelines section at www.cc-courts.org. The petition should recite only the amounts claimed and the relevant period of time, referring to the accompanying declaration(s), which should contain the explanation and justification. See also California Rules of Court, Rules 7.702 and 7.703 for declaration content. (Rule 7.306 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.307. The Order (a) Distribution and listing of cash and non-cash assets The distribution of property must be separately stated in detail, listing non-cash assets to be distributed as described in the Inventory and Appraisal, as well as the amount of cash to be distributed, under the name of each beneficiary. The order must be complete in itself and the total estate distributed must agree with property on hand as shown on Schedule F of the Summary of Account. Description by reference to the inventory is not acceptable. (b) Distribution of real property included in order For real property to be distributed, the order must include the legal description, the street address, if any, and the assessor’s parcel number. (c) Testamentary trusts For orders establishing testamentary trusts, see California Rules of Court, Rule 7.650. (7.307(c) revised effective 1/1/08) (Rule 7.307 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.308. Segregating Trust Income and Principal When any part of the estate is to be distributed to a trustee, and the accumulated income is to be paid by the trustee to the trust beneficiaries, the order shall allocate receipts and disbursements between principal and income. (Rule 7.308 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.309. Creditor’s Claims (a) Petition for final distribution The Petition for Final Distribution must show that all of decedent’s creditors received a Notice of Administration to Creditors (Judicial Council Form DE-157) at least seventy-five (75) calendar days before the hearing, or were paid or that there were no known creditors of decedent. (Probate Code Section 10900)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 163 of 200
Page 165¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(Rule 7.309(a) revised effective 1/1/16)
(b) Payment of funeral or debt expenses after general powers issued Unless accountings are waived, if any funeral expense or debt of the decedent was paid more than four months after letters with general powers issued, the petition shall show why the claim was not barred or the personal representative may be surcharged with interest for the payment. (Rule 7.309(b) revised effective 1/1/01) (c) Payment of funeral and debt expenses from estate Unless accounts are waived, if a decedent’s debt or funeral expense was paid from the estate without the filing of a creditor claim, the petition shall address the five elements (including timeliness of payment) of Probate Code Section 11005. (Rule 7.309(c) revised effective 1/1/01) (Rule 7.309 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.310. Federal Estate Taxes (a) Proration of federal estate taxes When proration of federal estate taxes is required by Probate Code Section 20110 et seq., the petition for distribution shall include a schedule showing the computation of the proration. (b) Final distribution of estate after estate taxes filed and paid An estate is not ready for final distribution until the estate tax returns have been filed, and the tax paid, unless no estate tax return is required to be filed.
If an estate tax return is required, the order for final distribution shall include a provision
that there will be no final discharge until final resolution of the estate tax liability (e.g. receipt of closing letter). (Rule 7.310(b) revised effective 1/1/08)
(Rule 7.310 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.311. Specifically Devised Property As to expenses allocable to specifically devised property (e.g., taxes, maintenance, repairs, insurance, debt servicing) see Estate of McSweeney (1954) 123 Cal.App.2d 787). For apportionment of income and expenses, see Probate Code Sections 12002, 9650, and 1063. (Rule 7.311 revised effective 1/1/15)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 164 of 200
Page 166¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 7.312. Distribution to Minors Where the Court has discretion, funds for minors or incompetent persons without a guardian or conservator of the estate will be required to be placed in a blocked, federally insured account. The Court does not favor transfer under the California Uniform Transfers to Minors Act unless the Will so provides. (Rule 7.312 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.313. Preliminary Distribution (a) Waiver of bond requirement In the event of a preliminary distribution made before the time for filing creditor’s claims has expired, a bond MUST be required of the distributees (Probate Code Section 11622). After the time for filing claims has expired, the Court will usually require a distributee’s bond unless the Inventory and Appraisal has been filed and the Petition sets forth sufficient facts showing that the distribution may be made without loss to creditors or injury to the estate or any interested person. (b) Petition to not require bond If the petition requests that no bond be required of the distributees, a clear and concise statement showing why bond should not be required must be included in the petition. (Rule 7.313 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.314. Procedure to be Followed by a Personal Representative in Actions for Damages Following Wrongful Death of Decedent or Other Actions that Survive the Death of Decedent (a) Issue special letters Special letters may be the proper vehicle for such actions. In appropriate circumstances, the Court may appoint a Special Administrator for a limited purpose with a termination date specified in the order and may require an appearance at a scheduled hearing date for a status report and to continue the appointment of the Special Administrator beyond that date. (b) Property of the estate If a personal representative collects damages arising out of the physical injury of the decedent or covering funeral expenses and costs of last illness, he or she shall hold such money in his or her representative capacity as property of the estate. (c) Damages for wrongful death Damages for wrongful death are held by the personal representative as a representative of the statutory beneficiaries and are not part of the estate. (Estate of Waits (1944) 23 Cal.2d 676). The disposition of such damages for wrongful death and the amount of
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 165 of 200
Page 167¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
attorney’s fees and costs shall be determined by the Court on a petition pursuant to Probate Code Section 9835.
(d) Notice requirements In addition to the usual notices given on hearing of such a petition, under Probate Code Section 9835, notice shall be served on the heirs at law in the same manner as if each had filed a request for special notice. (See also Code of Civil Procedure Sections 377.10 et seq.). (Rule 7.314 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.315. Grant of Additional Powers to Testamentary Trustee Notice must be given under Probate Code Section 17203 where the Petition for Distribution requests the Court to grant a trustee additional powers not conferred by the Will. The Court may require that a guardian ad litem be appointed for persons unascertained or not in being. (Probate Code Section 15405) (Rule 7.315 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.316. Application for Final Discharge All Ex Parte Petitions for Final Discharge and Order (Judicial Council Form DE-295) shall be submitted with a copy of the order of final distribution, and copies of any receipts from distributees. If the order requires distribution of funds to a blocked account, the request for final discharge shall be accompanied by a completed Receipt and Acknowledgment of Order for the Deposit of Money Into Blocked Account (Judicial Council Form MC-356). If the order distributes real property, the copy of the order submitted with the request for final discharge shall show that the order has been recorded in the appropriate county. If the order provided for a withhold greater than $2,000.00, there shall be included a schedule of disbursements for the withhold. (Rule 7.316 revised effective 1/1/18)
Rule 7.317. Payment of Costs of Administration A petition for final distribution or to terminate the proceeding must expressly state that all charges for legal advertising, bond premiums, probate referee’s services and costs of administration have been paid. (Rule 7.317 revised effective 1/1/15)
Chapter 8. Inventory and Appraisal
Rule 7.350. Preparation of Inventory and Appraisal Provide complete descriptions of each asset in the estate. (See Probate Code Section 8850). The legal description, street address (or a notation that the property is “unimproved”) and APN
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 166 of 200
Page 168¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
shall be shown for each parcel of real property. See California Decedent Estate Practice (CEB, Chapter 13); see also California Probate Referees website: probatereferees.net and the Guide to Using California Probate Referees found therein for a complete description of how properly to list assets on the Inventory. (Rule 7.350 revised effective 1/1/23)
Rule 7.351. Waiver of Appraisal by Probate Referee (a) Waiver of Probate Referee’s appraisal The Court does not favor the waiver of the Probate Referee’s appraisal under Probate Code Section 8903 in the absence of exceptional circumstances. (b) Deferral of Probate Referee’s appraisal The Court may allow deferral of the Probate Referee’s appraisal on a showing (1) that all beneficiaries have waived the Probate Referee’s Appraisal and (2) that fees and commissions for the personal representative and attorney have been waived. If these conditions remain when the estate is ready for final distribution, the Court may then waive the Probate Referee’s appraisal. (Rule 7.351 revised effective 1/1/15)
Chapter 9. Guardianships and Conservatorships
Guardianships
Rule 7.400. Initiation of Guardianship Investigation The Probate Investigations Unit will initiate a guardianship investigation except when the court specifically directs otherwise, only after the petitioner(s) has submitted a complete Proposed Guardian(s) Information (Local Court Form GC-20). The Probate Investigations Unit will initiate a termination of guardianship investigation only after the petitioner(s) has submitted a complete Termination of Guardianship Information (Local Court Form GC-21). (Rule 7.400 new effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.401. Temporary Guardianships The Court will not order a change of custody under a temporary guardianship unless doing so appears necessary for the protection of the minor. Minimum notice to parents will be required unless justified by a supporting declaration. (Rule 7.401 revised effective 1/1/15)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 167 of 200
Page 169¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 7.402. Consultation with Other Departments re: Custody or Dependency Proceedings Where a petition for guardianship of the person of a minor is pending and where it appears to the Court that a custody or dependency proceeding concerning the same minor is pending in any other department of the Superior Court, a consultation will be had between the judicial officers of the department in which such proceeding or writ is pending, and a determination made as to whether or not the matter should be heard separately or a consolidation arranged. (Rule 7.402 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.403. Guardianships for Dependent Children A guardianship for dependent minor children must be established in Juvenile Court under Welfare and Institutions Code Sections 366.25(e) or 366.26(d). The Juvenile Court retains jurisdiction to modify, revoke or terminate such guardianships. See Welfare and Institutions Code Sections 366.3 and 366.4. (Rule 7.403 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.404. Restriction on Parental Use of Minor’s Estate As there is a statutory liability upon the parents to support their children, where one or both parents are living, the Court will not permit guardianship funds to be used for the minor’s ordinary support and maintenance except upon a showing of the parents’ financial inability or other circumstances which would justify the Court in departing from this rule in the best interest of the minor. (Rule 7.404 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.405. Final Account of Guardian (a) Appearance by ward An appearance by the ward at the hearing on the guardian’s final account and petition will be required unless either:
(1) Proof of service is on file verifying that a copy of the final account and petition, and
notice of hearing thereon, has been served upon the ward not less than fifteen (15)
calendar days before the hearing, (Probate Code Section 1460), or
(2) The ward’s written acknowledgment of receipt and approval of the petition and final
account is on file.
(b) Waiver of account by ward The Court does not favor the waiving by the ward of a guardian’s final account when the ward has reached majority, and normally the Court will not approve a petition when the final account is waived, unless the ward is present in Court at the time of the hearing.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 168 of 200
Page 170¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(c) Discharge of guardian (1) A guardianship of the person and estate will terminate pursuant to Probate Code Sections 1600 and 1601.
(2) A discharge of the guardian will not occur until the expiration of one (1) year from
the date the minor attained the age of eighteen (18) years. See Probate Code
Section 2627.
(3) In the case of a minor for whom a conservatorship will be required, a petition for
appointment of a conservator may be filed during the proposed conservatee’s
minority in order to make the appointment of a conservator effective immediately
upon the minor’s attaining the age of eighteen (18) years (Probate Code Section
1820 (b).
(Rule 7.405 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.406. Setting guardianship hearing when a temporary guardianship has NOT been granted The matter shall be set for hearing generally not sooner than sixty (60) calendar days after the filing date to allow time for the Court Investigator’s Report. (Rule 7.406 new effective 1/1/17)
Rule 7.407. – Rule 7.410. Intentionally Omitted
Rule 7.411. Appointment of Conservator (a) Appointment of conservator Although Probate Code Section 2106 gives the Court discretion to appoint one conservator for several conservatees, the Court will generally not grant a petition joining more than one conservatee in a single proceeding, except husband and wife or domestic partners as defined in Probate Code Section 1894. (b) Appointment of Conservator The matter shall be set for hearing generally not sooner than sixty (60) calendar days after the filing date to allow time for the Court Investigator’s Report (Probate Code Section 1894). (Rule 7.411(b) revised effective 1/1/17) (Rule 7.411 revised effective 1/1/17)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 169 of 200
Page 171¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 7.412. Ex Parte Petitions for Appointment of Temporary Conservatorships (a) Notice Petitioner must notify all interested or opposing parties by fax, email, or telephone no later than 10:00 a.m. on the day before the scheduled hearing as provided by CRC, Rule 3.1203 and CRC, Rule 3.1204. A copy of a declaration regarding notice in compliance with CRC,
Rule 3.1204 — must be delivered to the Probate Department at the time the papers are¶
Rule 3.1204 must be delivered to the Probate Department at the time the papers are presented. Orders dispensing with notice must be supported by a declaration setting forth the exceptional circumstances that justify dispensing with notice. REPEALED IN PART (see California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1203, Rule 3.1204, Rule 7.55) Minimum notice to the conservatee and conservatee's spouse, if any, pursuant to Probate Code Section 2250(e)(2) and (3) will be required unless the Ex Parte Application for Good Cause Exception to Notice of Hearing on Petition for Appointment of Temporary Conservator (Judicial Council Form GC-112) is approved by the Court prior to the hearing. (b) Contents of Ex Parte Petition for Appointment of Temporary Conservatorship An application for an ex parte order appointing temporary conservator (Judicial Council Form GC-111) must be verified and must contain sufficient evidentiary facts to justify. (Rule 7.412 revised effective 1/1/23)
Rule 7.413. Specific Medical Treatment and Placement (a) Authority of conservator A conservator of the person generally has authority to fix the residence of, and place the conservatee in, any facility in this state, including a facility which restricts conservatee’s ability to leave. This authority is subject to limitations which may be placed on the conservator by statute or court order. These limitations include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) The placement must be the least restrictive appropriate setting which is available
and necessary to meet the conservatee’s needs. Ordinarily, a conservatee should
be allowed to remain in the conservatee’s residence in which the conservatee
resided before the establishment of the conservatorship so long as this is feasible.
(2) A conservatee with dementia may be placed in a facility specifically described in
Probate Code Section 2356.5(b) only with authorization as provided in that section.
The Court will not make an order for placement under Probate Code Section
2356.5(b) absent a showing that the specifically proposed placement is described
in Probate Code Section 2356.5(b). A petition for a court order regarding
placements in a facility not specifically described in Probate Code Section
2356.5(b) will be deemed a petition for instructions pursuant to Probate Code
Section 2359.
(3) Placement in a mental health treatment facility as defined in Probate Code Section
2356(a) requires an LPS conservatorship.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 170 of 200
Page 172¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(Rule 7.413(a) revised effective 1/1/16)
(b) Consent for psychotropic medications in conservatorships Psychotropic medication in conservatorships under the Probate Code is generally governed by the same provisions as other medical treatment. If the conservatee has been adjudicated to lack the capacity to consent to medical treatment generally, or to the application of psychotropic medication, then the conservator of the person generally has authority to consent to the medication. However, if the medication as described in Probate Code Section 2356.5 is to be given to a conservatee for the treatment of dementia who lacks the capacity to give informed consent to that medication, then the conservator of the person may authorize the medication only with prior authorization as provided by that Section. (Rule 7.413(b) revised effective 1/1/13) (Rule 7.413 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.414. Termination Conservatorship may be terminated pursuant to Probate Code Sections 1860 et seq., and Section 2626. The filing of a certification of competency issued by the superintendent of a state hospital pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code Section 7357, or other provision of law, does not, of itself, terminate a conservatorship. Conservatorships terminate by operation of law upon the death of the conservatee. Termination does not cause the Court to lose jurisdiction as to some issues, such as approval of accountings or awarding fees (Probate Code Section 2630 et seq.). (Rule 7.414 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.415. Accounts of Conservator Probate Code Section 2621 prescribes the requirement for giving notice of hearing on the account. See, also, Probate Code Sections 2620 and 2630 et seq., regarding provisions pertaining to accounts on termination of conservatorships. (Rule 7.415 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.416. Orientation Class Requirements for Unlicensed Conservators All conservators of person and/or estate who are not California Licensed Professional Fiduciaries (licensed by the Professional Fiduciary Bureau) should make reasonable efforts to complete either or both, depending on appointment, the Contra Costa Superior Court Probate Division Conservator of Person and/or Conservator of Estate classes that are offered monthly by the Contra Costa County Public Law Library. If a course is completed, the course completion form should be filed with the court. Courses completed by conservators at other California courts may satisfy this requirement in the Court’s discretion. (Rule 7.416 revised effective 1/1/23)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 171 of 200
Page 173¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 7.417 — Release of Information by Court Investigator for Benefit of Conservatees.¶
Rule 7.417. Release of Information by Court Investigator for Benefit of Conservatees. Court investigators shall be permitted to release to law enforcement agencies, adult protective services, or similar agencies, upon request or where it appears to the investigators that this would be in the best interest of the subject of a conservatorship proceeding, any reports or other information in the possession of the court’s investigators.
Rule 7.418. Intentionally Omitted
Rule 7.419. Warning on Order [Repealed 1/1/03]
Rule 7.420. Copies for Court Investigator (a) Extra copy of pleadings When an account, report or petition is filed as to which an investigation and/or report by the Probate Court Investigator is required, an extra copy of that pleading along with any other pleadings filed in relation to the matter shall be given to the legal process clerk at the time of filing. It is then to be routed to the Court Investigator. This includes (a) any petition for appointment of guardian or conservator, (b) any petition for appointment of temporary guardian or conservator, (c) any accounting except when the guardianship or conservatorship has terminated; and, (d) any petition for medical consent authority. (Rule 7.420(a) revised effective 1/1/15) (b) Petitioner to provide copies of pleadings to Court Investigator’s office If the Court requires a report from the Court Investigator after a pleading is filed, or if the extra copy required under this provision was inadvertently not given to the legal process clerk, then copies of all related pleadings, including the petition, accounting, orders, letters, inventory and appraisals, etc., shall be furnished by the petitioner by delivery or transmission to the Court Investigator’s office. (Rule 7.420(b) revised effective 1/1/15) (Rule 7.420 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.421. Intentionally Omitted and Reserved [Repealed 1/1/13]
Rule 7.422. Temporary Guardian or Conservator Upon the filing of a petition, a temporary guardian or conservator of the person or estate, or both, may be appointed under Probate Code Section 2250 et seq. A separate petition for the appointment of a general guardian or conservator must be presented to the Court to be filed before a petition for a temporary guardian or conservator will be considered. (Rule 7.422 revised effective 1/1/15)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 172 of 200
Page 174¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 7.423. Instructions Regarding General Duties and Conflicts of Guardian or Conservator Before Letters are issued, each guardian or conservator must complete, sign and file a Letters of Guardianship (Probate-Guardianships and Conservatorships) (Judicial Council Form GC-250). The form shall set forth the guardian or conservator’s duties as a fiduciary and outline the responsibilities as an officer of the Court. Social Security Number, driver’s license number and date of birth do not need to be supplied on the form. (Rule 7.423 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.424. Bonds of Conservators and Guardians Bond for an individual conservator or guardian will generally not be waived. The Court generally will not require a bond for amounts in blocked accounts. (See Probate Code Section 2328). (Rule 7.424 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.425. Accounts (a) Time of filing accounts with court The first account shall be filed on or before the first anniversary date of the order appointing the guardian or conservator; and subsequent accounts shall be filed at least biennially thereafter. The first account shall be for a minimum period of nine months from the date of appointment of the general conservator and shall also include any period of temporary appointment of the person as conservator or guardian. (b) Separate accounts required Where there are multiple wards or conservatees joined in a single guardianship or conservatorship proceeding, a separate accounting shall be provided for each of them. (c) Account ending date The ending date of an account, except an account ending upon the death of a conservatee, shall not be more than three months before the date it is filed with the Court. Filing an accounting late is not good cause for preventing the Court and court investigators from reviewing the current information regarding the matter. (Rule 7.425(c) revised effective 1/1/03) (d) Final account upon termination of guardianship The final account following termination of a guardianship or conservatorship of the estate must state that all charges for legal advertising, bond premiums, probate referee’s services and costs of administration have been paid. (Rule 7.425(d) revised effective 1/1/13)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 173 of 200
Page 175¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(e) Status report in lieu of final account following termination The final account following the termination of a conservatorship or guardianship of the estate should be filed within six (6) months of the termination date (e.g., the death of the conservatee or age the ward attains majority). If the conservator or guardian is unable to file the final account with the six-month period, the conservator or guardian shall file a status report setting forth the reasons for the delay and how much additional time is needed. (Rule 7.425(e) new effective 1/1/15) (Rule 7.425 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.426. Conservator and Guardian Compensation and Attorney’s Fees (a) Compensation of guardians and conservators Petitions for compensation of guardians and conservators and their attorneys shall be supported by a declaration, complying with Contra Costa Probate Court Guideline Attachment #2 from each individual requesting approval of fees. For information about Contra Costa Probate Court Fees and Costs Guidelines, go to the Probate Guidelines of the Local Rules at www.cc-courts.org/general/local-rules.aspx. The court prefers that the petition itself recite only the amounts claimed and the relevant period of time, referring to the accompanying declaration(s), which should contain the explanation and justification. See also California Rules of Court, Rules 7.751(b) and 7.756 for declaration content. (Rule 7.426(a) revised effective 1/1/16) (b) Compensation of attorneys Petitions for compensation of attorneys not representing fiduciaries may incorporate the explanation and justification into the petition, without a separate declaration. (Rule 7.426 (b) revised effective 1/1/13) (Rule 7.426 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.427. Independent Exercise of Powers (a) Declaration required for independent powers request The Court will ordinarily not grant the powers enumerated in Probate Code Section 2591. Because of the broad scope of this section, the Court requires a detailed declaration as to the necessity for the specific independent power desired. (b) Nature of independent power When independent powers are requested and granted, it is not sufficient to incorporate by reference the statute or its subsections. The power must be described in sufficient detail so that any person reading the document can determine the nature of the power requested or granted. Quoting the full text of the subsection enumerating the power under Probate
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 174 of 200
Page 176¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Code Section 2591 is the preferred method of complying with this rule. Even when granting the requested powers, the Court will normally require confirmation of sale of real property and prior court approval of attorney’s fees. (Rule 7.427(b) revised effective 1/1/15)
(Rule 7.427 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.428. Investments by Guardian or Conservator (Probate Code Section 2570 et seq.) (a) Real estate investment Investment in real estate, either by purchase or encumbrance, will not be authorized unless supported by an appraisal by the Probate Referee regularly appointed in the guardianship or conservatorship proceeding. (b) Life insurance A purchase of life insurance on the minor ward’s life will not be authorized. (c) Declaration required for request to invest If a request for special notice has not been filed, a petition for authority to invest may be heard ex parte provided the Court makes an order dispensing with notice. A declaration justifying dispensing with notice shall accompany or be incorporated in the petition. (Rule 7.428 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.429. Account Statements with Accountings Any account statement submitted pursuant to Probate Code Section 2620 which is required by that section to be confidential shall be filed as a separate document complying with California Rules of Court, Rules 2.100 et seq., including a verified statement by the petitioner identifying the document. The caption of the document shall include the word “CONFIDENTIAL” in all capital letters. (Rule 7.429 revised effective 1/1/15)
Chapter 10. Trusts
Rule 7.450. Trustee Compensation, and Attorney’s Fees Petitions for approval of prospective or previously paid compensation to trustees and/or their attorneys should discuss the factors in California Rules of Court, Rule 7.776 to the extent warranted by the circumstances of the case. See Probate Code §§ 16243 and 16247. For information about Contra Costa Probate Court Fees and Costs Guidelines, go to the Probate Guidelines section at www.cc-courts.org. (Rule 7.450 revised effective 1/1/16)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 175 of 200
Page 177¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Rule 7.451. Establishment of a Trust (a) Trust provisions for incapacitated person Absent special circumstances, whenever a trust is to be established by court order for the benefit of an incapacitated person, the trust shall contain the following provisions:
Protector of Trustor: Regardless of any other provision of the trust, in administering the
trust, the trustee shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as a conservator of
the estate during the lifetime of the trustor, including but not limited to:
(1) Posting bond for assets and income of the trust.
(2) Accounting to the Court (to be filed in this proceeding).
(3) Abiding with investment limitations.
(4) Adhering to limitations on gifts, pledge or sales of assets (including returns for
confirmation and overbids).
(5) Providing for the trustor’s needs without regard for the interest of the remainder
beneficiaries.
(6) Obtaining prior court approval for payment of fees to attorneys, conservators and
trustees.
(7) Obtaining prior court approval of any change of trustee during the trustor’s lifetime.
(8) Obtaining prior court approval for sale of beneficiary’s personal residence,
regardless of whether or not the residence was previously property of a
conservatorship estate
(Rule 7.451(a)(8) revised effective 1/1/15)
(b) Bond requirement in order The formal order shall provide that the trustee may not receive assets or otherwise act until the filing of a bond in the amount set by court. (Rule 7.451 revised effective 1/1/16)
Rule 7.452. Establishment of Special Needs Trust from Inheritance by Court Order To the extent that a person with special needs has not received a distribution of an inheritance from a probate or trust estate, the court may, upon suitable petition, issue an order establishing a special needs trust under Probate Code 3600 et seq. or 4541 complying with 42 United States Code §1396p(d)(4)(A). Unless the order explicitly excludes application of Local Rule 7.451. Local Rule 7.451 shall apply to administration of the special needs trust.
NOTE: For discussion of establishment of special needs trusts by court order, see Sections 11.10 through 11.46 and 15.24 of the CEB treatise on Special Needs Trusts. (Rule 7.452 revised effective 1/1/23)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 176 of 200
Page 178¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Chapter 11. Protective Proceedings
Rule 7.501. Proceeding for Spousal Property Transaction As to petitions pursuant to Probate Code Section 3100 et seq.:
(1) The petition must be supported by a declaration of a licensed physician or licensed psychologist within the scope of his or her licensure as to the capacity of the non- petitioning spouse (Probate Code Section 810 et seq.).
(2) Counsel will be appointed for the non-petitioning spouse if the petition proposes a substantial transfer to the petitioner.
(3) When the petitioner is predicated upon the non-petitioning spouse’s qualification for Medi - Cal benefits, notice shall also be given to the Director of the California Department of Health Services.
(4) In petitions to transfer assets, related to Medi-Cal eligibility, the petitioner shall provide the Court with schedules showing such calculations as would be required in an administrative hearing to the extent that the Community Spouse Resource Allowance or the Minimum Monthly Maintenance Needs Allowance would be in issue. The Court will not make orders modifying the Community Spouse Resource Allowance nor the Minimum Maintenance Monthly Needs Allowance but may make findings as to the proper amounts as needed to support the order.
(5) The Court will not issue general support orders in petitions under Probate Code Section 3100 et seq. (Rule 7.501 revised effective 1/1/15)
Rule 7.502. Establishment of a Trust [Repealed 1/1/13]
Chapter 12. Elisors
Rule 7.520. Elisors For rules and procedure regarding the appointment of an elisor, please refer to Local Rule 5.12. (Rule 7.520 new effective 1/1/18)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 177 of 200
Page 179¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Chapter 13. Guidelines for Probate Rules - Attachments
Guideline, Attachment 1 – The ABCs of Dividing the Commission Pie in Probate Sales (includes chart)
LLOYD W. HOMER, ESQ.
CAMPBELL
(a) Division of broker commission The following chart demonstrates the division of the broker commission when estate property is sold subject to Court confirmation pursuant to Probate Code Sections 10160- 10167. If the property subject to sale is being sold pursuant to the personal representative’s authority under independent administration, the chart is inapplicable and Probate Code Sections 10400-10600 must be consulted. For sales subject to Court confirmation, the personal representative also needs to consult Probate Code Sections 10250-10264 (personal property) and Probate Code Sections 10300-10316 (real property) regarding the manner of conducting the sale. WHO ARE A, B AND C? A = The estate (Seller). If the estate has a broker, that will be broker A.
B = The bidder (Buyer). If the bidder has a broker, that will be broker B.
C = The successful overbidder (New Buyer). If C has a broker, that will be broker
FACTS:
Original bid $100,000.
Where there is an overbid, the increased bid is $110,000
Commission allowed by the Court is 6%
A B C PROBATE COMMISSION TO CODE BROKER SELLER BUYER OVERBIDDER SECTION
1 No Broker No Broker No Over bid None None 2 No Broker No Broker No Over bid None None 3 No Broker No Broker Broker 10163(b) “C” receives $5,000 (Not $6,600 because of limitation of Section 10162) 4 No Broker Broker No Over bid 10162.3 “C” receives $6,000 5 No Broker Broker No Broker 10164 “C” receives $6,000 6 No Broker Broker Broker 10165(c)(2) “B” receives $3,000
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 178 of 200
Page 180¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
“C” receives $3,600 ($3,000
10165(b) on original bid and $600 on
the increased bid)
7 Broker No Broker No Over bid 10162.5 “A” receives $6,000 8 No Broker Broker No Over bid 10162.7 “A” receives $3,000 “B” receives $3,000 (or as “A” and “B” have agreed) 9 Broker No Broker No Broker 10162.5 “A” receives $6,000 10 Broker No Broker Broker 10165(c)(1) “A” receives $3,000 10165(b) “C” receives $3,600 ($3,000 on original bid and $600 on the increased bid) 11 Broker Broker No Broker 10164(c) “A” receives $3,000 “B” receives $3,000 (or as “A” and “B” have agreed) 12 Broker Broker Broker 10165(c)(3) “A” receives $1,500 “B” receives $1,500 (or as “A” and “B” have agreed) “C” receives $3,600 ($3000 on original bid and $600 on the increased bid)
The following documents are provided as referenced by the local rules, but are not intended to be adopted as local rules. These documents are included for informational purposes only. (Guideline Attachment 1, revised effective 7/1/06)
Guideline, Attachment 2 – Probate Department Fees and Costs Guidelines The Probate Department has established these general guidelines for allowable fees and costs in probate, trust, guardianship and conservatorship proceedings.
FEES (a) Particular Fees for Probate Investigations Unit
(1) The fee for probate investigations for guardianship and conservatorship
investigation is $800.
(2) The fee for probate investigations for conservatorship reviews is $500.
(3) The fee for probate investigations for guardianships of the estate and off -
year accountings for conservatorships of the estate is $300.
(4) The fee for probate investigations for guardianship of the estate review
shall be $500.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 179 of 200
Page 181¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(b) Attorney’s rates: The standard maximum attorney’s fees for guardianships, conservatorships and extraordinary probate services is set forth below. The Court will consider higher hourly rates upon a showing of good cause. The standard maximum attorney’s legal assistant rate is $175.00 per hour.
Attorney Years of Experience Guideline Hourly Rates Range
0-5 $295-$350
6-10 $350-$400
11-19 $400-$475
20+ $500
Attorneys with California State Bar Specializations or LL.M. degrees in either Estate
Planning, Trust & Probate Law, or Taxation shall receive an additional $50.00 per hour.
Multiple increases are not permitted for attorneys with a State Bar Specialization and
LL.M. degree.
(c) Fiduciary rates: The maximum allowable hourly rate for professional fiduciaries is between $125 and $195 per hour. Fiduciary staff rates for care managers are between $95 and $175 per hour, and between $85 and $125 per hour for administrative staff. (d) Non-professional fiduciary rates: The standard maximum hourly rate for other fiduciaries is $75.00 per hour. (e) Higher rates: The determination of requests for higher rates will be based on all relevant factors presented, including special expertise applicable to the services provided, circumstances of the service, and relationship to the decedent, or other parties. (f) Travel time: The Court will not generally allow attorney fees for more than two hours of travel time, total, per appearance. (g) Format and content: (1) Fee requests, except those calculated using a percentage of the assets, shall include a narrative description of the types of services performed, including the number of hours and the rates requested for each type, distinguishing between hours and rates for each person performing each type of service. “Types of services” means a project-based approach, so that all activities (e.g.,
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 180 of 200
Page 182¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
correspondence and phone calls, drafting pleadings, court appearances, research,
etc.) related to a particular objective (e.g., initial petition, general administration,
each contested matter, sale of property, substituted judgment, preparation of each
accounting, etc.) should be summarized and addressed together as one “type.”
Do not group and discuss services based on activity (e.g., all court appearances
as one “type,” all correspondence as another “type,” etc.).
Requests for fees for attorney’s legal assistants must be in compliance with
California Rules of Court, Rule 7.703(e) which includes compliance with Business
and Professions Code § 6450(a). The request shall state such compliance.
Fee requests for fiduciaries and staff should include the qualifications of the biller,
such as number of years of experience as a fiduciary or in a related field,
education, and any other special skills or benefits that justify the billing rate and/or
need for the provided services.
(2) Copies of timesheets or billing statements need not be attached or provided unless
requested by the Court or its staff (probate examiners or court investigators).
However, in anticipation that time records or statements may be requested,
separate entries should be made for each different activity and project, so that the
amount of time expended for one activity is not obscured by “clumping” it with other
activities in a single time entry.
(3) Fee requests, except those calculated using a percentage of the assets (see
paragraph H below) and those below the maximum amount without a declaration
(see subparagraph G.4 below), shall state the number of hours expended by the
attorney in preparing the explanation and justification of the attorney’s
compensation, and also the number of hours expended by the attorney in
preparing the explanation and justification of the fiduciary’s compensation, if
applicable. The Court will ordinarily approve up to two and a half hours for
preparation of the attorney fee explanation without requiring separate justification
for the amount of time spent. The Court is likely to require separate justification
for attorney time spent in excess of two and a half hours for the attorney fee portion.
The Court may require separate justification for any amount of attorney time spent
on the fiduciary fee portion.
(4) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Court will ordinarily approve an annual fiduciary
fee of up to $2,500.00 for non-professional fiduciaries, and up to $3,000.00 for
professional fiduciaries, without requiring a declaration.
(5) See Fee Declaration Template below for example of how narrative description and explanation might be presented. (h) Percentage of assets calculations: The Court will approve, without a supporting declaration, annual fees of up to one percent (1%) of the present fair market value of all estate property only upon a factual showing that either (1) the governing instrument specifically provides for this measure of compensation, or (2) this measure of compensation is reasonable (considering the factors
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 181 of 200
Page 183¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
set forth in California Rule of Court 7.776) and in the best interests of the estate and its beneficiaries. The conclusory statement that “annual fees of 1% of the present fair market value of all estate property is customary in the community”, or words to that effect, without more, is not a sufficient factual showing for this purpose. Unless otherwise stated in the governing instrument, the “present fair market value of all estate property” shall include all real and personal property at the beginning of the accounting period, but not including income received during the accounting period or net gains and/or losses. Good faith estimates of fair market value of real property by the fiduciary are sufficient for this purpose. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the court retains the discretion to adjust requested compensation on a case-by-case basis, after considering all of the facts. The Court will ordinarily approve a minimum annual fiduciary fee of up to $1,500.00 for non- professional fiduciaries, and up to $3,000.00 for professional fiduciaries. (Guideline, Attachment 2, Fees revised effective 1/1/23)
COSTS AND EXPENSES (i) Reasonable costs Reasonable court costs will be allowed. (j) Disallowed costs The Court will not allow reimbursement, or approve expenditures, for expenses incurred for ordinary business operations associated with services compensated by:
(1) statutory compensation or;
(2) professional fees (e.g., attorneys, professional fiduciaries and corporate
fiduciaries). Unusual amounts of such expenses which are disproportionately large
in consideration of the fee amount may be approved.
These expenses include, without limitation, copying, postage, telephone calls
(excluding CourtCall costs), cellular telephone charges, facsimile transmissions,
email or internet access. Courier rates and charges may be subject to court
review. Upon a proper and detailed showing, reimbursement for travel and other
expenses may be allowed. Attorneys and fiduciaries may claim copy expenses for
any timesheets or billing invoices attached to fee declarations or petitions or
produced upon request, and for reproduction of documents required under Probate
Code § 2620(c), at the rate of 10 cents per page (if reproduced in-house) or actual
out-of-pocket expense (if reproduced by outside copy service, for black and white
on ordinary copy paper).
(Guideline, Attachment 2, Costs revised effective 1/1/20)
(Guideline, Attachment 2, revised effective 1/1/21)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 182 of 200
Page 184¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Guideline, Attachment 3 – Fee Declaration Template Components of fee declaration [caption]
1. I am [identifying information]. I make this declaration in support of [reference to petition
or other purpose]. Statements herein are true of my personal knowledge, except for
those stated upon information and belief, which I also believe to be true for the reasons
stated.
2. This declaration describes services I have provided from [beginning date] through
[ending date]. I am requesting compensation at the rate of $[rate] per hour for my
services and [specify other rates for each person billing time included in this fee
request]. Total compensation requested is $[total amount], based on [X] hours @
$[first rate] ($[subtotal]) plus [Y] hours @ $[second rate] ($[subtotal]) [continue if
needed for more than two persons].
3. In addition, I am requesting reimbursement for the following costs: [specify]
4. Services for which I am now seeking compensation are summarized as follows
[categories are examples only]:
[The following categories are more typical of attorney services than fiduciary services]
A. Initial Petition: [Describe services rendered by each person involved.]
B. Temporary Powers Petition: [Describe services rendered by each person
involved.]
C. General Administration: [Describe services rendered by each person involved.]
[Typical activities for this category would be marshalling assets, preparation of
inventory and appraisal, investment decisions, bill-paying and account
reconciliation. This is by no means an exhaustive list.]
D. Sale of Residence: [Describe services rendered by each person involved.]
E. Contested Claim: [Describe services rendered by each person involved.]
F. Substituted Judgment Petition: [Describe services rendered by each person
involved.]
G. Accounting and Fee Petition: [Describe services rendered by each person
involved. In addition, specify amount of time spent preparing this fee declaration
and (if declarant is the attorney) amount of time spent preparing client-fiduciary’s
fee declaration.]
[The following categories are more typical of fiduciary services than attorney services]
H. Initial Case Evaluation and Document Review: [Describe services rendered by
each person involved. This would include conferring with fiduciary’s attorney,
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 183 of 200
Page 185¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
proposed beneficiary of services and/or his/her attorney, and preparation of
pleadings before appointment.]
I. General Care Management: [Describe services rendered by each person
involved.] [Typical activities for this category would be evaluating care needs,
hiring and supervising care providers, client status monitoring and visitation,
accompaniment on medical professional office visits, and communications with
family members and other interested persons regarding general health and care
status, including fiduciary’s attorney. This is by no means an exhaustive list.]
J. General Financial Administration: [Describe services rendered by each person
involved.] [Typical activities for this category would be marshalling assets,
preparation of inventory and appraisal, investment decisions, bill-paying and
account reconciliation, and communications with fiduciary’s attorney regarding
these matters. This is by no means an exhaustive list.]
K. Sale or Encumbrance of Property: [Describe services rendered by each person
involved.]
L. Eviction or Other Special Proceeding: [Describe services rendered by each person
involved.]
M. Accounting and Fee Petition: [Describe services rendered by each person
involved.]
5. Time spent on each type of service is summarized as follows:
[Match first column categories to descriptions used in paragraph 4. For example, if using
the attorney-type categories (which are only examples, not mandatory), row descriptions
would be as follows:]
Declarant ($X/hr) Person #2 ($Y/hr) Person #3 ($Z/hr)
Initial Petition
Temporary Powers Petition General Administration Sale of Residence Contested Claim Substituted Judgment Pet. Accounting and Fee Pet. Total hours Charges
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 184 of 200
Page 186¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
6. [If paralegal used, give facts to show compliance Probate Code § 2642(a) and
California Rules of Court, Rule 7.754.]
7. [To extent appropriate, add further explanation or justification, including any relevant
and significant factors in California Rules of Court 7.702, 7.756, or 7.776.]
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Dated: [Date]
__________________________________
[Declarant Name and Office]
(Guideline, Attachment 3, revised effective 1/1/16)
Guideline, Attachment 4 – Probate Department Operations (a) Calendars The probate calendars are as follows:
Tuesdays at 1:30 p.m. in Dept. 15 – all probate cases involving the Public Guardian.
Tuesdays at 1:40 p.m. in Dept. 15 – all probate cases (e.g. LPS Conservatorships) governed by the Welfare & Institutions Code.
All other probate matters are currently scheduled as follows:
Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays at 9:00 a.m. for all other conservatorships.
Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays at 9:30 a.m. for guardianships.
Tuesdays and Thursdays at 9:00 a.m. – all other probate matters. (Guideline, Attachment 4(a), revised effective 1/1/18)
(b) Ex parte applications All requests for ex parte orders shall be submitted to the Probate Examiners for review between 9:30 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. Monday through Friday, 725 Court Street, Room 210, Martinez, CA. (Guideline, Attachment 4(b), revised effective 1/1/15) (c) Tentative rulings Tentative rulings are generally available at least seven (7) court days before the hearing on the Tentative Rulings Website at www.cc-courts.org/tr. If you are unable to access the website, the number to call between 1:30 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. any time after the ruling is posted is (925) 608-2613.
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 185 of 200
Page 187¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Tentative rulings are not posted for matters on the Tuesday, 1:40 p.m. calendars due to confidentiality requirements. Parties to such matters and their attorneys may receive the tentative rulings for their specific matters by calling the probate staff between 1:30 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. at (925) 608-2613. (Guideline, Attachment 4(c), revised effective 1/1/18)
(Guideline, Attachment 4 revised effective 1/1/18)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 186 of 200
Page 188¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Title Eight. Appellate Rules
Chapter 1. General Provision
Rule 8.1. Appellate Division (a) Sessions Regular sessions of the Appellate Division of the Superior Court, County of Contra Costa shall be held on the first Friday of each calendar month at 1:30 p.m. Special sessions shall be held at the call of the Presiding Judge of the Appellate Division. (Rule 8.1(a) revised effective 7/1/21) (b) Court record Pursuant to California Rules of Court Sections 8.830(a)(1)(B) and 8.833(a), the Court elects to use the original trial court file as the record of the written documents from the trial court proceedings instead of a clerk’s transcript. (Rule 8.1(b) revised effective 1/1/11) (c) Record of oral proceedings (1) In appeals of infraction cases, the Appellate Division permits the Appellant, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 8.915, to submit as the record of oral proceedings the official electronic recording of the proceedings.
(2) The Appellate Division prefers a transcript or recording of oral proceedings over a
Statement on Appeal. If Appellant elects to use a Statement on Appeal, the
Appellate Division requires strict compliance with Rule of Court 8.916. If appellant
does not comply with Local Rule 8.916, the Appellate Division may dismiss the
appeal for lack of adequate record. If a Statement on Appeal does not adequately
apprise the Appellate Division of the content of the proceedings below, the
Appellate Division may, on its own motion and with notice to the parties, augment
the record pursuant to Rules of Court 8.923 and 8.841 with an official transcript or
electronic recording of proceedings.
(Rule 8.1(c) revised effective 1/1/14)
(d) Oral argument Unless otherwise ordered, counsel for each party, upon all direct appeal matters, shall be allowed fifteen (15) minutes for oral argument. The appellant or the moving party shall have the right to open and close. (Rule 8.1(d) revised effective 7/1/08)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 187 of 200
Page 189¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
(e) Briefs Briefs shall be prepared, served, and filed as provided by California Rules of Court, Rule 8.882. Briefs shall comply with the provisions of California Rules of Court 8.883 and 8.884. (Rule 8.1(e) revised effective 1/1/10) (f) Calendaring A hearing will be set as a matter of right in direct appeals only. All other appellate matters, for example writs, will be set at the discretion of the Appellate Department.
Hearings will be set pursuant to the California Rules of Court. The Appellate Department generally hears all appeals at 1:30 p.m. on the first Friday of each month. (Rule 8.1(f) revised effective 7/1/08)
(g) Motions All motions shall be heard at regular sessions unless a different time of the hearing of a particular motion is designated by the Presiding Judge of the Appellate Department. (Rule 8.1(g) revised effective 1/1/00) (h) Writs of Habeas Corpus Each judge assigned to the Appellate Division shall also be assigned, individually on a rotating basis, to hear and decide petitions for writ of habeas corpus filed in conjunction with cases that are, or may eventually be, on appeal in the Appellate Division. This assigned judge shall decide such petitions as an individual Superior Court judge, and his or her decision is not subject to review by the Appellate Division. (Rule 8.1(h) added effective 1/1/18)
(Rule 8.1 revised effective 7/1/21)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 188 of 200
Page 190¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Local Court Forms by Number
Effective Form Name Form Number Date
ADR-201 Selection of ADR Panel Member Pre-ADR Discovery Plan Form (Mandatory) 10/14/16 ADR-202 Selection Form (Mandatory) 12/20/17 ADR-203 ADR Panel Member Update Form (Optional) 10/14/16 ADR-206 Settlement Mentor Survey (Optional) 10/14/16 ADR-301 Mediation Notice of Date Time & Place (Optional) 10/14/16 ADR-302-INFO Information for Mediators (Optional) 10/14/16 ADR-303 How Mediation Works (Optional) 7/20/17 ADR-305 Mediator’s Report (Optional) 10/14/16 ADR-306 Mediation Survey (Optional) 10/18/18 ADR-312-INFO Preparing For Your Mediation (Optional) 10/14/16 ADR-313-INFO Mediation Worksheet (Optional) 8/1/16 ADR-401 Judicial Arbitration Notice of Date Time & Place (Optional) 10/14/16 ADR-402-INFO Information for Judicial Arbitrators (Optional) 10/14/16 ADR-403 Arbitration Instruction (Optional) 10/14/16 ADR-405 Award of Arbitrator (Optional) 8/2/16 ADR-406 Arbitration Survey (Optional) 10/14/16 ADR-501 Neutral Case Evaluation Notice of Date Time & Place (Optional) 10/14/16 ADR-502-INFO Information for Evaluators (Optional) 10/14/16 ADR-503 How Neutral Case Evaluation Works (Optional) 10/14/16 ADR-505 Neutral Case Evaluation Report (Optional) 10/14/16 ADR-506 Neutral Case Evaluation Survey (Optional) 10/14/16 ADR-602 Stipulation to Participate in discovery Facilitator Program (Mandatory) 5/30/23 ADR-610 Request for Assignment of Discovery Facilitator (Optional) 6/28/13 Notice of Assignment of Second Discovery Facilitator After First RejectionADR-612 1/24/13 (Optional) ADR-614 Discovery Facilitator Program Finding of Non-Compliance (Mandatory) 7/12/16 ADR-615 Notice of Termination of Appointment of Discovery Facilitator (Mandatory) 7/12/16 Recommendations of Discovery Facilitator and Termination of Appointment ofADR-616 7/12/16 Discovery Facilitator (Mandatory) ADR-617 Rejection of Assigned Discovery Facilitator (Optional) 1/24/13 Notice to Deponent and Deposition Officer of Assignment to DiscoveryADR-618 11/24/14 Facilitator Program and Stay of Business Records Production Date (Mandatory) AODS-1 Notice to Report DUI Form 7/11/22 CAF-50 Court Referral to Custody Alternative Facility (Optional) 7/11/22 COP-INFO Change of Plea Guidelines (Optional) 7/11/22 CPO-19 Misdemeanor Pre-Trial Diversion Order (Optional) 1/1/22 CPO-20 Felony Pre-Trial Diversion Order (Optional) 1/1/22 CPO-21 Pre-Trial Misd Drug Diversion Order (Optional) 1/1/22 Petition to Designate Charges in the Complaint, Information or Indictment asCR-47 3/6/15 Misdemeanors (PC 1170.18(f)) (Optional) CR-48 Petition for Resentencing – Response and Order (Optional) 3/2/15 CR-100a DUI Assessment Form (Optional) 2/28/13 CR-100a-SP Formulario de evaluación de DUI (Optional) 6/20/13 CR-101a Misdemeanor Advisement of Rights, Waiver, and Plea 6/6/23
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 189 of 200
Page 191¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
CR-102a Felony Advisement of Rights, Waiver, and Plea (Optional) 11/18/21 CR-110a PC 286 Sample Collection Form 7/8/13 CR-114 Criminal Records Copies Request (Mandatory) 5/24/21 CR-121 Promissory Note - Property Bond (Mandatory) 6/1/11 CR-128 Information Regarding Property Bonds (Optional) 6/1/11 CR-129 Request for Copy of Notice of Default and Sale (Optional) 7/20/11 CR-147 Criminal Record Search Request (Mandatory) 4/29/20 CR-183 Waiver of Personal Presence 8/2/16 CR-418 Request for Matter to be Calendared (Optional) 4/29/20 Request for Matter to be Placed on Misdemeanor Calendar (Attorney Use Only)CR-419 5/7/20 (Optional) CR-420 Continuance Form (Optional) 5/7/20 CR-500 Change of Plea Instructions 1/1/16 CR-506 Defendant’s Statement of Assets / Financial Evaluation (PC 1203.4) (Optional) 7/16/12 CR-MISC Change Of Address (Optional) 11/21/18 Authorization to Access Confidential Court Documents by Agent for Attorney ofCV-50 4/6/12 Record (Optional) CV-130 Civil Bench Warrant (Mandatory) 2/8/13 CV-627 Judgment - Sister State (Optional) 5/14/18 ADR Case Management Stipulation and Order (Unlimited Jurisdiction CivilCV-655b 10/14/16 Cases) (Mandatory) CV-655c INFO - ADR Information for Unlimited Civil (Optional) 10/14/16 CV-655d-INFO Notice to Defendants in Unlimited Jurisdiction Civil Actions (Optional) 8/16/16 CV-659c Issue Conference Statement (Mandatory) 8/16/16 ADR Case Management Stipulation (Limited Jurisdiction Civil Cases)CV-659d 10/14/16 (Mandatory) CV-659e INFO - ADR Information for Limited Civil (Optional) 8/16/16 CV-660b Writ of Possession of Real Property (Optional) 1/1/12 Application and Order to Serve Summons by Posting for Unlawful DetainerCV-667 7/28/21 (Optional) EA-150a Instructions Restraining Orders - Elder Abuse (Optional) 11/16/22 Declaration To Support Request for Order Shortening Time for Service andFamLaw-007b 1/1/13 Hearing (Optional) FamLaw-06 Seek Work Order (Optional) 4/11/17 FamLaw-06a Weekly Job Search Log (Optional) 4/11/17 FamLaw-018 Request To Appear Remotely For Mediation (Optional) 5/8/23 FamLaw-INFO Options To Appear (Optional) 5/18/22 FamLaw-INFO-SP Options To Appear (Spanish) (Optional) 6/22/22 FamLaw-30-INFO Notice Re Noncompliance (Optional) 2/10/23 FamLaw-30-INFO - Notice Re Noncompliance (Spanish) (Optional) 2/10/23SP FamLaw-31 Client Authorization for Review of Court File (Family Code 7643) (Optional) 4/10/19 FmLaw-34 Declaration Re: Expedited Default Or Uncontested Judgment (Optional) 7/18/23 F amLaw-70 Notice of Termination of Privately Compensated Temporary Judge Appointment 7/1/2025 FamLaw-107 Declaration RE Notice Upon Ex Parte Application For Orders (Optional) 2/25/21 FamLaw-112 Request for Case Management Conference (Optional) 11/14/23 FamLaw-113 Case Management Conference Statement (Optional) 11/14/23 FamLaw-114 Stipulation for Entry of Judgment (Optional) 2/20/15 FamLaw-116 Stipulation to Extend Time to Bring Case to Judgment (Optional) 1/1/20 FamLaw-125-INFO Options to Appear at Your Hearing: In Person or Remotely (Optional) 6/30/22 FamLaw-125-INFO - Options to Appear at Your Hearing: In Person or Remotely (Spanish) 6/30/22SP (Optional) FamLaw-130 Service Provider Annual Declaration (Mandatory) 11/2/22
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 190 of 200
Page 192¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
FamLaw-131 Request to File Oversized Declaration (Optional) 11/18/22 FamLaw-201 Checklist - Ex Parte Application (Optional) 3/9/21 FamLaw-206 Notice Upon Ex Parte Application for Orders (Optional) 7/5/18 FamLaw-213 Ex Parte Intake Form (Cases with Children) (Optional) 4/30/12 Stipulation and Order Re Continuance of Court Hearing to a Date After theFamLaw-230 7/1/16 Custody Counseling Appointment (Mandatory) Stipulation and Order Appointing Private Confidential Mediator or CCRCFamLaw-300 1/1/19 (Optional) Consent to Appoint as Private Confidential Mediator or Child CustodyFamLaw-301 1/1/19 Recommending Counselor and Declaration RE Qualifications (Optional) FamLaw-310b Declaration Re Notice Upon Request to Reschedule Hearing (Mandatory) 11/2/20 FamLaw-310-INFO Information Regarding Notice (Optional) 11/2/20 GC-02 Declaration Regarding Notice (Optional) 1/17/07 GC-03e Guardianship Filing Instructions (Optional) 3/30/22 GC-03e-SPN Guardianship Filing Instructions (Spanish) (Optional) 3/30/22 GC-06 Application and Order for Deferral of Court Investigation 5/6/13 Contact Information Pursuant to Probate Code §2250.6(a)(1)(A)(B)(C),GC-11 8/24/17 §1826(a)(1)(2), §1851(a) (Optional) GC-20 Proposed Guardian(s) Information (Optional) 11/1/23 GC-21 Termination of Guardianship Information Form (Optional) 11/25/14 GC-51 Parental Diagram (Optional) 11/15/21 GC-51-SPN Parental Diagram (Spanish) (Optional) 11/15/21 GC-53 Instructions for LHI Guardianships (Optional) 5/10/22 GC-53-SPN Instructions for LHI Guardianships (Spanish) (Optional) 5/10/22 GC-54 Checklist and Instructions for Guardian Service (Optional) 11/15/21 GC-54-SPN Checklist and Instructions for Guardian Service (Optional) 11/15/21 Juvenile Dependency - Stipulated Request and Order for Submission onJUV-001 5/8/20 Report(s) Without Hearing or Setting Hearing (Optional) Juvenile Delinquency - Stipulated Request and Order to Submit Issue onJUV-002 5/8/20 Report Without Hearing (Optional) MC-032 Application and Order for Duplicate Original (Optional) 6/21/22 MC-30 Request for Court Reporting Services by a Party with Fee Waiver (Optional) 10/18/18 MC-300e&s Interpreter Request (Optional) 1/24/18 MC-301 Language Access Services (Optional) 1/30/17 NC-001 Name Change Application (Optional) 9/6/19 NC-002 Civil Petition for Name Change – General Information (Optional) 1/1/16 NC-100 Petition for Change of Name (Optional) 9/6/19 NC-101 Name Change to Conform to Gender Identity (Mandatory) 9/6/19 NC-102 Gender and Name Change (Mandatory) 9/6/19 NC-103 Gender Change Packet (Mandatory) 9/6/19 REC-01 Mail Request for Court Records (Mandatory) 4/22/20 SC-08 Request for Dismissal (Small Claims) (Optional) 4/7/21 Notice of Motion & Declaration to Vacate Dismissal and Enter Judgment onSC-11 1/10/17 Settlement Agreement (Small Claims) (Optional) Notice of Motion & Declaration to Correct the Name of the Judgment DebtorSC-12 1/10/17 (Small Claims) (Optional) SC-13 Request for Certified Mail (Small Claims) (Optional) 12/8/16 Application and Order to Transfer Small Claims Case to Superior CourtSC-20 8/4/16 (Optional) SC-21 Stipulation to Vacate Judgment and Order (Optional) 12/8/16 Ex Parte Application, Declaration and Order to Serve the Secretary of StateSC-22 1/24/17 (Corp. Code § 1702) (Optional) Instructions for Using Form S-22 Application for Order to Serve Sec of StateSC-22-INFO 1/24/17 (Optional)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 191 of 200
Page 193¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
TJ-100 Notice and Stipulation for Temporary Judge (Optional) 7/13/22 TJ-110 Stipulation to Temporary Judge in Unlawful Detainer Matter (Optional) 7/13/22 TR-100 Traffic Infraction Appeal Packet (Optional) 1/1/17 TR-121 Civil Assessment and Declaration to Vacate Civil Assessment (Mandatory) 7/8/16 TR-123 Written Plea Form and Request For Monthly Payments (Mandatory) 11/22/22 TR-123s Formulario de admisión escrita y Solicitud de pagos mensuales (Mandatory) 11/22/22
Notice and Waiver of Rights and Request for Remote Video ProceedingTR-128 7/12/23 (Mandatory)
WV-150a-INFO Instructions Restraining Orders – Workplace Harassment (Optional) 3/2/20
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 192 of 200
Page 194¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Local Court Forms by Name
Effective Form Name Form Number Date
ADR Case Management Stipulation (Limited Jurisdiction Civil Cases) (Mandatory) CV-659d 10/14/2016 ADR Case Management Stipulation and Order (Unlimited Jurisdiction Civil Cases) CV-655b 10/14/2016(Mandatory) ADR Panel Member Update Form (Optional) ADR-203 10/14/2016 Application and Order for Deferral of Court Investigation GC-06 5/6/2013 Application and Order for Duplicate Original (Optional) MC-032 6/21/2022 Application and Order to Serve Summons by Posting for Unlawful Detainer CV-667 7/28/2021(Optional) Application and Order to Transfer Small Claims Case to Superior Court (Optional) SC-20 8/4/2016 Arbitration Instruction (Optional) ADR-403 10/14/2016 Arbitration Survey (Optional) ADR-406 10/14/2016 Authorization to Access Confidential Court Documents by Agent for Attorney of CV-50 4/6/2012Record (Optional) Award of Arbitrator (Optional) ADR-405 8/2/2016 Case Management Conference Statement (Optional) FamLaw-113 11/14/2023 Change Of Address (Optional) CR-MISC 11/21/2018 Change of Plea Guidelines (Optional) COP-INFO 7/11/2022 Change of Plea Instructions CR-500 1/1/2016 Checklist - Ex Parte Application (Optional) FamLaw-201 3/9/2021 Checklist and Instructions for Guardian Service (Optional) GC-54 11/15/2021 Checklist and Instructions for Guardian Service (Optional) GC-54-SPN 11/15/2021 Civil Assessment and Declaration to Vacate Civil Assessment (Mandatory) TR-121 7/8/2016 Civil Bench Warrant (Mandatory) CV-130 2/8/2013 Civil Petition for Name Change – General Information (Optional) NC-002 1/1/2016 Client Authorization for Review of Court File (Family Code 7643) (Optional) FamLaw-31 4/10/2019 Consent to Appoint as Private Confidential Mediator or Child Custody FamLaw-301 1/1/2019Recommending Counselor and Declaration RE Qualifications (Optional) Contact Information Pursuant to Probate Code §2250.6(a)(1)(A)(B)(C), GC-11 8/24/2017§1826(a)(1)(2), §1851(a) (Optional) Continuance Form (Optional) CR-420 5/7/2020 Court Referral to Custody Alternative Facility (Optional) CAF-50 7/11/2022 Criminal Record Search Request (Mandatory) CR-147 4/29/2020 Criminal Records Copies Request (Mandatory) CR-114 5/24/2021 Declaration RE Notice Upon Ex Parte Application For Orders (Optional) FamLaw-107 2/25/2021 Declaration Re Notice Upon Request to Reschedule Hearing (Mandatory) FamLaw-310b 11/2/2020 Declaration Re: Expedited Default Or Uncontested Judgment (Optional) FamLaw-34 7/18/2023 Declaration Regarding Notice (Optional) GC-02 1/17/2007 Declaration To Support Request for Order Shortening Time for Service and FamLaw-007b 1/1/2013Hearing (Optional) Defendant’s Statement of Assets / Financial Evaluation (PC 1203.4) (Optional) CR-506 7/16/2012 Discovery Facilitator Program Finding of Non-Compliance (Mandatory) ADR-614 7/12/2016 DUI Assessment Form (Optional) CR-100a 2/28/2013 Ex Parte Application, Declaration and Order to Serve the Secretary of State (Corp. SC-22 1/24/2017Code § 1702) (Optional)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 193 of 200
Page 195¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Ex Parte Intake Form (Cases with Children) (Optional) FamLaw-213 4/30/2012 Felony Advisement of Rights, Waiver, and Plea (Optional) CR-102a 11/18/2021 Felony Pre-Trial Diversion Order (Optional) CPO-20 1/1/2022 Formulario de admisión escrita y Solicitud de pagos mensuales (Mandatory) TR-123s 11/22/2022 Formulario de evaluación de DUI (Optional) CR-100a-SP 6/20/2013 Gender and Name Change (Mandatory) NC-102 9/6/2019 Gender and Name Change (Mandatory) NC-102 9/6/2019 Gender Change Packet (Mandatory) NC-103 9/6/2019 Guardianship Filing Instructions (Optional) GC-03e 3/30/2022 Guardianship Filing Instructions (Spanish) (Optional) GC-03e-SPN 3/30/2022 How Mediation Works (Optional) ADR-303 7/20/2017 How Neutral Case Evaluation Works (Optional) ADR-503 10/14/2016 INFO - ADR Information for Limited Civil (Optional) CV-659e 8/16/2016 INFO - ADR Information for Unlimited Civil (Optional) CV-655c 10/14/2016 Information for Evaluators (Optional) ADR-502-INFO 10/14/2016 Information for Judicial Arbitrators (Optional) ADR-402-INFO 10/14/2016 Information for Mediators (Optional) ADR-302-INFO 10/14/2016 FamLaw-310-Information Regarding Notice (Optional) 11/2/2020 INFO Information Regarding Property Bonds (Optional) CR-128 6/1/2011 Instructions for LHI Guardianships (Optional) GC-53 5/10/2022 Instructions for LHI Guardianships (Spanish) (Optional) GC-53-SPN 5/10/2022 Instructions for Using Form S-22 Application for Order to Serve Sec of State SC-22-INFO 1/24/2017(Optional) Instructions Restraining Orders - Elder Abuse (Optional) EA-150a 11/16/2022 Instructions Restraining Orders – Workplace Harassment (Optional) WV-150a-INFO 3/2/2020 Interpreter Request (Optional) MC-300e&s 1/24/2018 Issue Conference Statement (Mandatory) CV-659c 8/16/2016 Judgment - Sister State (Optional) CV-627 5/14/2018 Judicial Arbitration Notice of Date Time & Place (Optional) ADR-401 10/14/2016 Juvenile Delinquency - Stipulated Request and Order to Submit Issue on Report JUV-002 5/8/2020Without Hearing (Optional) Juvenile Dependency - Stipulated Request and Order for Submission on Report(s) JUV-001 5/8/2020Without Hearing or Setting Hearing (Optional) Language Access Services (Optional) MC-301 1/30/2017 Mail Request for Court Records (Mandatory) REC-01 4/22/2020 Mediation Notice of Date Time & Place (Optional) ADR-301 10/14/2016 Mediation Survey (Optional) ADR-306 10/18/2018 Mediation Worksheet (Optional) ADR-313-INFO 8/1/2016 Mediator’s Report (Optional) ADR-305 10/14/2016 Misdemeanor Advisement of Rights, Waiver, and Plea CR-101a 6/6/2023 Misdemeanor Pre-Trial Diversion Order (Optional) CPO-19 1/1/2022 Name Change Application (Optional) NC-001 9/6/2019 Name Change to Conform to Gender Identity (Mandatory) NC-101 9/6/2019 Neutral Case Evaluation Notice of Date Time & Place (Optional) ADR-501 10/14/2016 Neutral Case Evaluation Report (Optional) ADR-505 10/14/2016 Neutral Case Evaluation Survey (Optional) ADR-506 10/14/2016 Notice and Stipulation for Temporary Judge (Optional) TJ-100 7/13/2022 Notice and Waiver of Rights and Request for Remote Video Proceeding TR-128 7/12/2023(Mandatory) Notice of Assignment of Second Discovery Facilitator After First Rejection ADR-612 1/24/2013(Optional) Notice of Motion & Declaration to Correct the Name of the Judgment Debtor (Small SC-12 1/10/2017Claims) (Optional)
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 194 of 200
Page 196¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Notice of Motion & Declaration to Vacate Dismissal and Enter Judgment on SC-11 1/10/2017Settlement Agreement (Small Claims) (Optional) Notice of Termination of Appointment of Discovery Facilitator (Mandatory) ADR-615 7/12/2016 Notice of Termination of Privately Compensated Temporary Judge Appointment FamLaw-70 7/1/2025 Notice Re Noncompliance (Optional) FamLaw-30-INFO 2/10/2023 FamLaw-30-Notice Re Noncompliance (Spanish) (Optional) 2/10/2023 INFO-SP Notice to Defendants in Unlimited Jurisdiction Civil Actions (Optional) CV-655d-INFO 8/16/2016 Notice to Deponent and Deposition Officer of Assignment to Discovery Facilitator ADR-618 11/24/2014Program and Stay of Business Records Production Date (Mandatory) Notice to Report DUI Form AODS-1 7/11/2022 Notice Upon Ex Parte Application for Orders (Optional) FamLaw-206 7/5/2018 Options To Appear (Optional) FamLaw-INFO 5/18/2022 FamLaw-INFO -Options To Appear (Spanish) (Optional) 6/22/2022 SP FamLaw-125-Options to Appear at Your Hearing: In Person or Remotely (Spanish) (Optional) 6/30/2022 INFO-SP FamLaw-125-Options to Appear at Your Hearing: In Person or Remotely (Optional) 6/30/2022 INFO Parental Diagram (Optional) GC-51 11/15/2021 Parental Diagram (Spanish) (Optional) GC-51-SPN 11/15/2021 PC 286 Sample Collection Form CR-110a 7/8/2013
Petition for Change of Name (Optional) NC-100 9/6/2019 Petition for Resentencing – Response and Order (Optional) CR-48 3/2/2015 Petition to Designate Charges in the Complaint, Information or Indictment as CR-47 3/6/2015Misdemeanors (PC 1170.18(f)) (Optional) Preparing For Your Mediation (Optional) ADR-312-INFO 10/14/2016 Pre-Trial Misd Drug Diversion Order (Optional) CPO-21 1/1/2022 Promissory Note - Property Bond (Mandatory) CR-121 6/1/2011 Proposed Guardian(s) Information (Optional) GC-20 11/1/2023 Recommendations of Discovery Facilitator and Termination of Appointment of ADR-616 7/12/2016Discovery Facilitator (Mandatory) Rejection of Assigned Discovery Facilitator (Optional) ADR-617 1/24/2013 Request for Assignment of Discovery Facilitator (Optional) ADR-610 6/28/2013 Request for Case Management Conference (Optional) FamLaw-112 11/14/2023 Request for Certified Mail (Small Claims) (Optional) SC-13 12/8/2016 Request for Copy of Notice of Default and Sale (Optional) CR-129 7/20/2011 Request for Court Reporting Services by a Party with Fee Waiver (Optional) MC-30 10/18/2018 Request for Dismissal (Small Claims) (Optional) SC-08 4/7/2021 Request for Matter to be Calendared (Optional) CR-418 4/29/2020 Request for Matter to be Placed on Misdemeanor Calendar (Attorney Use Only) CR-419 5/7/2020(Optional) Request To Appear Remotely For Mediation (Optional) FamLaw-018 5/8/2023 Request to File Oversized Declaration (Optional) FamLaw-131 11/18/2022 Seek Work Order (Optional) FamLaw-06 4/11/2017 Selection Form (Mandatory) ADR-202 12/20/2017 Selection of ADR Panel Member Pre-ADR Discovery Plan Form (Mandatory) ADR-201 10/14/2016 Service Provider Annual Declaration (Mandatory) FamLaw-130 11/2/2022 Settlement Mentor Survey (Optional) ADR-206 10/14/2016 Stipulation and Order Appointing Private Confidential Mediator or CCRC (Optional) FamLaw-300 1/1/2019 Stipulation and Order Re Continuance of Court Hearing to a Date After the FamLaw-230 7/1/2016Custody Counseling Appointment (Mandatory) Stipulation for Entry of Judgment (Optional) FamLaw-114 2/20/2015
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 195 of 200
Page 197¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Stipulation to Extend Time to Bring Case to Judgment (Optional) FamLaw-116 1/1/2020 Stipulation to Participate in discovery Facilitator Program (Mandatory) ADR-602 5/30/2023 Stipulation to Temporary Judge in Unlawful Detainer Matter (Optional) TJ-110 7/13/2022 Stipulation to Vacate Judgment and Order (Optional) SC-21 12/8/2016 Termination of Guardianship Information Form (Optional) GC-21 11/25/2014 Traffic Infraction Appeal Packet (Optional) TR-100 1/1/2017 Waiver of Personal Presence CR-183 8/2/2016 Weekly Job Search Log (Optional) FamLaw-06a 4/11/2017 Writ of Possession of Real Property (Optional) CV-660b 1/1/2012 Written Plea Form and Request For Monthly Payments (Mandatory) TR-123 11/22/2022
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 196 of 200
Page 198¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
JUDICIAL COUNCIL FORMS:
CM-110 Case Management Statement DE-111 Petition for Probate DE-157 Notice of Administration to Creditors DE-275 Ex Parte Petition for Approval of Sale of Personal Property and Order (Mandatory) DE-295 Ex Parte Petition for Final Discharge and Order DE-147S Confidential Statement of Birth Date and Driver’s License Number FL-141 Declaration Regarding Service of Declaration of Disclosure and Income and Expense Declaration FL-150 Income and Expense Declaration FL-182 Judgment Checklist-Dissolution/Legal Separation FL-300 Request for Order FL-326 Declaration of Private Child Custody Evaluator Regarding Qualifications FL-327 Order Appointing Child Custody Evaluator GC-112 Ex Parte Application for Good Cause Exception to Notice of Hearing on Petition for Appointment of Temporary Conservator GC-250 Letters of Guardianship (Probate-Guardianships and Conservatorships) JV-200/JV-205 Custody Order-Juvenile-Final Judgment-Visitation Order-Juvenile JV-290 Caregiver Information Form JV-290-INFO Instructions to Complete the Caregiver Information Form JV-570 Request for Disclosure of Juvenile Case File JV-575 Petition to Obtain Report of Law Enforcement Agency MC-051 Notice of Motion and Motion to Be Relieved As Counsel-Civil MC-052 Declaration In Support of Attorney's Motion to Be Relieved As Counsel-Civil MC-053 Order Granting Attorney's Motion to Be Relieved As Counsel-Civil MC-356 Receipt and Acknowledgment of Order for The Deposit of Money Into Blocked Account MC-500 Media Request to Photograph, Record, or Broadcast MC-510 Order on Media Request to Permit Coverage NC-100 Petition for Change of Name NC-110 Attachment to Petition for Change of Name NC-120 Order to Show Cause for Change of Name (Change of Name) RA-010 Notice of Remote Appearance
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 197 of 200
Page 199¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
RA-015 Opposition to Remote Proceeding at Evidentiary Hearing or Trial RA-020 Order Regarding Remote Appearance
For local court forms, visit: www.cc-courts.org/forms For Judicial Council forms, visit: www.courts.ca.gov/forms
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 198 of 200
Page 200¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
INDEX
A Issue Conference, 49, 51, 52, 53, 144 Administration of Civil Litigation, 44 Issue Conference Statement, 49, 52, 53 ADR, 37, 46, 49, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85 J Appeals, 98 Judicial Commitments, 142 Appellate Department, 187, 188 Juvenile Court, 102, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, Arbitration, 73, 74 137, 168 Assigned Judge, 48 Juvenile Court Commissioner, 131 Assistant Presiding Judge, 16 M C Mediation, 70, 71, 72, 80, 136 CASA, 133 Motions, 24, 35, 51, 58, 62, 63, 80, 81, 84, 86, 87, Case Management Conference, 46, 48, 49, 50, 88, 89, 106, 132, 188 67, 68, 102, 103, 108, 109, 110, 113 Motions in Limine, 51 Civil Law and Motion, 58 Civil Law and Motion – Calendar, 58 PCivil Litigation, 16, 56, 58, 59 Presiding Judge, 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 39, 45, 63,Commissioner, 21, 22, 23, 53, 58, 131 66, 67, 94, 101, 123, 127, 130, 142, 187, 188Committee on Bias, 38 Probate Court, 127, 128, 134, 142, 144, 147, 148,Communication of Concerns, 41 149, 150, 163, 172, 174, 175Confidential, 117, 128, 155, 197 Probate Department, 58, 66, 81, 179, 185Court Reporter, 143 Probate Matters, 65, 67, 142, 143, 144Criminal Court, 128 Probate Rules, 142, 178 Probation, 91, 133, 134, 138D Delinquency, 134 RDependency, 134, 168 Remote Appearances, 41Discovery Facilitator, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85 Restraining Orders, 101 Rules – Adoption and Amendment, 16E Evaluator, 76, 112, 113, 124, 125, 126, 127, 197 SEx Parte, 36, 60, 61, 89, 101, 103, 122, 127, 151, Sanctions, 29, 51, 120, 121, 146 166, 185, 197 Settlement Statement (Unlawful Detainer), 52Executive Committee, 16, 17, 131 Supervising Judge, 16, 69, 91, 101, 103, 104,Expert, 126 105, 130, 131, 132, 136 F TFamily Court, 100, 109, 120, 122, 123, 134 Telephone Appearance, 51, 60Family Law, 16, 19, 44, 58, 65, 67, 100, 101, 103, Temporary Judge, 77, 78, 131, 132 104, 108, 117, 118, 121, 123, 125 Temporary Restraining Orders, 101, 103, 104Fee Schedule, 24 Tentative Ruling, 59, 146, 185 Transferred Cases, 44G Governance, 16, 17, 131 UGrand Jury, 16, 23, 24 Unlawful Detainer, 24, 44, 46, 47, 54, 55, 58Guardianship, 134, 167, 173, 197 WI Waiver of Account, 162, 168 Interpreter, 106
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 199 of 200
Page 201¶
Local Rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
APPENDIX A: STANDING ORDERS
NOTE: Standing Orders are subject to change. Orders included with the Local Rules are current as of 1/1/2025. For a current version of all standing orders, please see the Court’s Local Rules webpage: https://www.cc-courts.org/general/local-rules.aspx
2025 Local Court Rules – Effective July 1, 2025 Page 200 of 200
Page 202¶
Superior Court of California County of Contra Costa APPENDIX A: STANDING ORDERS Table of Contents SUBJECT AREA CATEGORY #
JUDICIAL AUTHORITY ............................................................................ 1
FILED
Designation of Alternate Judges to Authorize Interception 05/22/2013 1.1 of Wire Communications. AMENDED
1/3/2023
Substitution of Attorneys in Juvenile Court Dependency FILED 1.2 Cases 05/28/2015
FILED
5/30/2018 1.3 Order Regarding Unlawful Detainer Cases AMENDED
09/02/2021
Order Directing Commissioners to Conduct Contempt FILED
1.4 Proceedings 12/13/2019
FILED 1.5 Order re: Standing Orders (Rescinding and Renumbering) 11/3/2022
FILED 1.6 Subordinate Judicial Officers 1/30/2024
FILED 1.7 Implementing CRC 10.365 re Judge Remote Appearance 7/24/2024
FILED 1.8 General Order re: Use of Electronic Recording Equipment 12/30/2024
RECORDS AND RECORD ACCESS ........................................................ 2
Standing Order (Probate) Re: Release of Information for the FILED 2.1 Benefit of Minors. 12/12/2000
DATED Order and Agreement Re Preservation of Court Records. 2.2 01/10/2005
FILED 2.3 Order to Purge Misdemeanor Arrest and Bench Warrants. 8/29/2024
2.4 Order to Recall all Outstanding Bench Warrants issued on FILED
Unsigned Citations 06/12/2012
Revised June 11, 2025 Page 1 of 3
Page 203¶
Superior Court of California County of Contra Costa APPENDIX A: STANDING ORDERS Table of Contents SUBJECT AREA CATEGORY #
RECORDS AND RECORD ACCESS (cont.) ............................................ 2
Order Re Release of Information Pertaining to Minors FILED
2.5 Described by Section 601 or 602 of the Welfare and 07/08/2013
Institutions Code
FILED 2.6 Courtesy Copies to DA Office for 827 File Review Requests 8/3/2015
Confidentiality of Court Records; Local Inmates and FILED 2.7 Petitions for Involuntary Psychiatric Medication 4/10/2019
FILED
2.8 PC 987 Funding Orders 12/19/2023
Electronic Access to Court Records (Second Amended) FILED 2.9 6/11/2025
FILING AND FILING DATES .................................................................... 3
FILED 3.1 Facsimile Filing in Certain Juvenile Cases 10/1/2019
FILED
6/13/2022 3.2 E-Filing in Civil Cases AMENDED
2/11/2025
FILED 3.3 Penal Code Section 1203.425 Expungements 1/20/2023
FILED 3.4 E-Filing in Criminal and Juvenile Cases 11/16/2023
Revised June 11, 2025 Page 2 of 3
Page 204¶
Superior Court of California County of Contra Costa APPENDIX A: STANDING ORDERS Table of Contents SUBJECT AREA CATEGORY #
GENERAL ORDERS ................................................................................. 4
FILED Order Regarding Return of Dangerous, Toxic, Bio - 4.1 5/15/2015 Hazardous Materials/Exhibits
Order Authorizing Children and Family Services Bureau to FILED
4.2 Regularly Photograph Dependent Children For 9/14/2015
Identification and Documentation Purposes
FILED
4.3 Court Reporters in Family Law Cases 8/11/2021
Revised June 11, 2025 Page 3 of 3
Page 205¶
Standing Order 1.1 PILE JAN ~ 3 2023 K. BIEKER CLERK OF THE COURT. ERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2! grgasex costa IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA aed Date: January 2, 2023 DEPARTMENT 1 JUDGE: EDWARD G. WEIL COURT CLERK: DIANA GHIRARDO UNREPORTED AMENDED STANDING ORDER RE: WIRE AUTHORIZATIONS Pursuant to Penal Code Section 629.50, the Court hereby designates Judge John Kennedy as the judge of the Superior Court authorized to review, sign, and otherwise handle all matters pertaining to any application for an order or modification of an order authorizing the interception of a wire or electronic communication (as defined in penal Code section 629.50 et seq.), when such an application is presented by the Attorney General’s Office or the District Attorney’s Office. Further pursuant to Section 629.50, the following additional judges are authorized to review and sign an order authorizing an interception. 4 Judge Terri Mockler 2. Judge Mary Ann O’Malley This order supersedes any prior versions. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 2, 2023 ZA. (, (LA HON. EDWARD G. WEIL Presiding Judge of the Superior Court Contra Costa County
Page 206¶
Standing Order 1.2 ~ Superior Court of the State of California U [ D For the County of Contra Costa | MAY 28 ois | L Juvenile Court i" Coyt By, STANDING ORDER #3 (2015) Substitution of Attorneys in Juvenile Court Dependency Cases In criminal cases, the trial court, in its discretion, may deny such a motion if discharge will result in ‘significant prejudice’ to the defendant, or if it is not timely, i-e., if it will result in ‘disruption of the orderly processes of justice’. (People v. Ortiz, 51 Cal.3d 975, 983.) This does not reflect the balance of interests in dependency cases. The focus of dependency law is on 5 1 11 1 2 3 270 716 39 24 96.723297 the 5 1 11 1 2 4 319 717 164 30 96.780777 preservation 5 1 11 1 2 5 493 717 30 24 96.860695 of 5 1 11 1 2 6 529 717 39 24 96.860695 the 5 1 11 1 2 7 579 717 84 31 96.962730 family 5 1 11 1 2 8 674 725 25 17 96.955048 as 5 1 11 1 2 9 709 718 55 24 96.843414 well 5 1 11 1 2 10 775 726 26 16 96.843414 as 5 1 11 1 2 11 811 718 39 24 96.993996 the 5 1 11 1 2 12 860 718 85 31 97.005463 safety, 5 1 11 1 2 13 955 719 142 30 95.824150 protection, 5 1 11 1 2 14 1108 720 46 23 96.907089 and 5 1 11 1 2 15 1163 720 109 30 96.598648 physical 5 1 11 1 2 16 1283 720 46 24 97.013008 and 5 1 11 1 2 17 1339 720 127 24 96.963173 emotional 4 1 11 1 3 0 184 755 1158 34 -1 5 1 11 1 3 1 184 755 142 30 96.409012 well-being 5 1 11 1 3 2 336 755 30 24 96.929756 of 5 1 11 1 3 3 371 755 39 24 96.973145 the 5 1 11 1 3 4 421 755 85 24 93.067947 child. (§ 300.2. W&I Code) the children's interests are of paramount consideration. The rights and protections afforded parents in a dependency proceeding are not the same as those afforded to the accused in a criminal proceeding. (In re James F. (2008) 42 Cal.4th 901, 915) Pursuant to section 352, the juvenile court may for good cause order a continuance of a dependency hearing. Section 352 mandates that before the court can grant a continuance it must give 5 1 11 1 8 5 535 948 139 24 97.016426 substantial 5 1 11 1 8 6 685 949 89 30 96.818489 weight 5 1 11 1 8 7 783 952 24 21 96.577812 to 5 1 11 1 8 8 818 957 13 16 95.720901 a 5 1 11 1 8 9 841 949 96 24 95.720901 minor's 5 1 11 1 8 10 947 950 61 23 96.338951 need 5 1 11 1 8 11 1018 949 38 25 96.833015 for 5 1 11 1 8 12 1065 954 95 27 96.821198 prompt 5 1 11 1 8 13 1170 950 132 25 96.821198 resolution 5 1 11 1 8 14 1311 951 31 24 96.903793 of 5 1 11 1 8 15 1347 951 36 24 96.514671 his 5 1 11 1 8 16 1392 959 26 16 96.884148 or 5 1 11 1 8 17 1428 951 41 23 96.884148 her 4 1 11 1 9 0 184 985 1289 35 -1 5 1 11 1 9 1 184 985 103 31 96.955109 custody 5 1 11 1 9 2 297 989 82 25 96.872665 status, 5 1 11 1 9 3 389 986 40 23 96.293777 the 5 1 11 1 9 4 439 986 61 24 94.512627 need 5 1 11 1 9 5 510 990 24 20 95.457756 to 5 1 11 1 9 6 545 986 100 31 97.006332 provide 5 1 11 1 9 7 655 986 107 25 96.988251 children 5 1 11 1 9 8 772 987 57 24 97.014099 with 5 1 11 1 9 9 840 988 75 23 96.953743 stable 5 1 11 1 9 10 926 988 186 29 95.889992 environments, 5 1 11 1 9 11 1123 989 45 23 96.808891 and 5 1 11 1 9 12 1179 989 39 23 96.994965 the 5 1 11 1 9 13 1228 989 102 31 96.345924 damage 5 1 11 1 9 14 1340 993 23 20 96.954437 to 5 1 11 1 9 15 1374 997 12 16 96.825844 a 5 1 11 1 9 16 1395 989 78 24 96.775284 minor 4 1 11 1 10 0 185 1023 1225 35 -1 5 1 11 1 10 1 185 1023 30 24 96.858955 of 5 1 11 1 10 2 221 1024 134 30 96.806557 prolonged 5 1 11 1 10 3 364 1028 136 27 97.010895 temporary 5 1 11 1 10 4 511 1025 171 30 96.689690 placements.” 5 1 11 1 10 5 692 1025 37 30 96.617714 (In 5 1 11 1 10 6 738 1033 26 16 96.957603 re 5 1 11 1 10 7 774 1026 125 24 93.306229 Elizabeth 5 1 11 1 10 8 908 1027 24 23 91.872696 R. 5 1 11 1 10 9 946 1027 86 30 95.634468 (1995) 5 1 11 1 10 10 1043 1027 29 23 91.751541 35 5 1 11 1 10 11 1084 1027 162 31 91.097046 Cal.App.4th 5 1 11 1 10 12 1259 1028 69 28 95.917114 1774, 5 1 11 1 10 13 1342 1028 68 30 96.642136 1798) 2 1 12 0 0 0 184 1083 1286 35 -1 3 1 12 1 0 0 184 1083 1286 35 -1 4 1 12 1 1 0 184 1083 1286 35 -1 5 1 12 1 1 1 184 1083 36 23 96.987038 The 5 1 12 1 1 2 240 1079 109 43 96.928490 juvenile 5 1 12 1 1 3 361 1087 67 20 96.595078 court 5 1 12 1 1 4 438 1084 43 24 96.595078 has 5 1 12 1 1 5 491 1084 74 24 96.900673 broad 5 1 12 1 1 6 576 1084 129 24 96.663223 discretion 5 1 12 1 1 7 715 1085 24 23 96.660927 in 5 1 12 1 1 8 749 1085 159 31 96.853722 determining 5 1 12 1 1 9 918 1085 106 25 96.888283 whether 5 1 12 1 1 10 1033 1090 24 20 97.012070 to 5 1 12 1 1 11 1068 1091 66 26 96.805191 grant 5 1 12 1 1 12 1144 1094 14 16 96.849976 a 5 1 12 1 1 13 1167 1087 166 24 93.295540 continuance. 5 1 12 1 1 14 1345 1088 24 30 93.229637 (§ 5 1 12 1 1 15 1380 1088 90 29 93.075584 352(a); 2 1 13 0 0 0 184 1183 1282 69 -1 3 1 13 1 0 0 184 1183 1282 69 -1 4 1 13 1 1 0 185 1183 1281 33 -1 5 1 13 1 1 1 185 1184 55 29 96.453743 Any 5 1 13 1 1 2 251 1187 108 27 96.717819 attorney 5 1 13 1 1 3 368 1183 105 31 96.744080 wishing 5 1 13 1 1 4 482 1188 25 20 96.909927 to 5 1 13 1 1 5 518 1184 126 24 96.920380 substitute 5 1 13 1 1 6 654 1184 24 24 96.803009 in 5 1 13 1 1 7 687 1188 24 21 95.910080 to 5 1 13 1 1 8 722 1192 14 17 93.394630 a 5 1 13 1 1 9 741 1185 109 30 93.394630 juvenile 5 1 13 1 1 10 860 1185 157 31 96.709236 dependency 5 1 13 1 1 11 1026 1194 56 16 96.921875 case 5 1 13 1 1 12 1092 1190 64 20 96.644310 must 5 1 13 1 1 13 1165 1186 86 25 97.011665 follow 5 1 13 1 1 14 1260 1187 39 24 97.011665 the 5 1 13 1 1 15 1309 1187 79 24 96.790421 below 5 1 13 1 1 16 1397 1187 69 24 96.927063 listed 4 1 13 1 2 0 184 1221 341 31 -1 5 1 13 1 2 1 184 1221 146 31 96.550896 procedures 5 1 13 1 2 2 340 1222 46 24 96.889633 and 5 1 13 1 2 3 395 1222 130 25 96.129639 timelines: 2 1 14 0 0 0 234 1299 1229 224 -1 3 1 14 1 0 0 234 1299 1229 224 -1 4 1 14 1 1 0 288 1299 1050 33 -1 5 1 14 1 1 1 288 1299 23 30 96.813217 1) 5 1 14 1 1 2 385 1299 25 24 92.421974 If 5 1 14 1 1 3 415 1299 107 24 92.421974 retained 5 1 14 1 1 4 532 1300 99 24 96.347626 counsel 5 1 14 1 1 5 642 1300 20 24 96
1 13 1 2 2 340 1222 46 24 96.889633 and 5 1 13 1 2 3 395 1222 130 25 96.129639 timelines: 2 1 14 0 0 0 234 1299 1229 224 -1 3 1 14 1 0 0 234 1299 1229 224 -1 4 1 14 1 1 0 288 1299 1050 33 -1 5 1 14 1 1 1 288 1299 23 30 96.813217 1) 5 1 14 1 1 2 385 1299 25 24 92.421974 If 5 1 14 1 1 3 415 1299 107 24 92.421974 retained 5 1 14 1 1 4 532 1300 99 24 96.347626 counsel 5 1 14 1 1 5 642 1300 20 24 96.819084 is 5 1 14 1 1 6 673 1300 153 31 96.933823 substituting 5 1 14 1 1 7 836 1300 25 24 96.898651 in 5 1 14 1 1 8 870 1300 38 25 96.282616 for 5 1 14 1 1 9 917 1301 129 31 96.822342 appointed 5 1 14 1 1 10 1056 1302 108 29 96.521225 counsel, 5 1 14 1 1 11 1174 1310 14 16 96.918610 a 5 1 14 1 1 12 1197 1302 93 24 96.526634 motion 5 1 14 1 1 13 1300 1302 38 24 97.004967 for 4 1 14 1 2 0 235 1337 1154 33 -1 5 1 14 1 2 1 235 1337 155 24 97.012131 substitution 5 1 14 1 2 2 400 1341 63 20 96.918228 must 5 1 14 1 2 3 473 1338 30 23 96.924362 be 5 1 14 1 2 4 513 1337 59 25 97.001442 filed 5 1 14 1 2 5 582 1338 58 24 96.117653 with 5 1 14 1 2 6 649 1338 39 24 96.282127 the 5 1 14 1 2 7 699 1339 74 23 96.950592 Court 5 1 14 1 2 8 782 1342 23 21 95.767113 at 5 1 14 1 2 9 815 1339 59 24 95.767113 least 5 1 14 1 2 10 883 1343 48 20 96.719353 two 5 1 14 1 2 11 942 1340 80 24 96.241730 weeks 5 1 14 1 2 12 1032 1339 84 25 96.904823 before 5 1 14 1 2 13 1126 1348 46 22 96.753922 any 5 1 14 1 2 14 1183 1340 130 24 96.896904 scheduled 5 1 14 1 2 15 1323 1345 66 20 96.982246 court 4 1 14 1 3 0 235 1375 1228 33 -1 5 1 14 1 3 1 235 1375 105 31 96.641418 hearing. 5 1 14 1 3 2 351 1375 58 24 96.981148 This 5 1 14 1 3 3 419 1376 94 24 97.015778 motion 5 1 14 1 3 4 523 1380 63 20 96.836205 must 5 1 14 1 3 5 596 1377 30 23 96.924950 be 5 1 14 1 3 6 636 1377 84 24 96.839661 served 5 1 14 1 3 7 730 1385 32 16 96.877174 on 5 1 14 1 3 8 772 1377 31 24 96.118317 all 5 1 14 1 3 9 813 1377 104 31 96.016968 existing 5 1 14 1 3 10 927 1381 120 27 94.811630 attorneys 5 1 14 1 3 11 1057 1378 24 24 96.568611 in 5 1 14 1 3 12 1091 1378 39 24 96.848190 the 5 1 14 1 3 13 1140 1386 62 16 96.656082 case. 5 1 14 1 3 14 1214 1379 50 23 96.946159 The 5 1 14 1 3 15 1274 1379 95 28 95.661644 motion, 5 1 14 1 3 16 1376 1379 47 24 96.834808 will 5 1 14 1 3 17 1434 1379 29 24 97.013954 be 4 1 14 1 4 0 235 1413 1147 34 -1 5 1 14 1 4 1 235 1417 36 20 96.984573 set 5 1 14 1 4 2 280 1413 38 24 96.980682 for 5 1 14 1 4 3 328 1421 14 16 96.963699 a 5 1 14 1 4 4 350 1414 100 30 96.638115 hearing 5 1 14 1 4 5 459 1415 121 30 96.147438 promptly 5 1 14 1 4 6 590 1415 47 24 96.140968 and 5 1 14 1 4 7 646 1415 118 31 96.140968 normally 5 1 14 1 4 8 774 1415 65 24 97.017380 there 5 1 14 1 4 9 849 1415 50 24 95.839943 will 5 1 14 1 4 10 909 1416 30 24 95.839943 be 5 1 14 1 4 11 948 1424 32 16 96.715218 no 5 1 14 1 4 12 990 1416 159 24 96.771751 continuance 5 1 14 1 4 13 1159 1416 30 25 96.924568 of 5 1 14 1 4 14 1194 1417 40 24 96.905907 the 5 1 14 1 4 15 1244 1417 138 30 96.864731 previously 4 1 14 1 5 0 235 1452 1220 33 -1 5 1 14 1 5 1 235 1452 132 24 96.671280 scheduled 5 1 14 1 5 2 376 1452 100 31 96.523964 hearing 5 1 14 1 5 3 485 1460 26 16 96.776649 as 5 1 14 1 5 4 521 1460 14 16 96.776649 a 5 1 14 1 5 5 545 1453 124 24 96.865990 condition 5 1 14 1 5 6 679 1453 30 24 96.576210 of 5 1 14 1 5 7 714 1453 40 24 96.805588 the 5 1 14 1 5 8 764 1454 74 23 96.805588 Court 5 1 14 1 5 9 847 1454 110 31 96.728889 granting 5 1 14 1 5 10 965 1454 40 24 96.817749 the 5 1 14 1 5 11 1015 1454 161 25 96.817749 substitution. 5 1 14 1 5 12 1186 1455 63 23 96.792732 New 5 1 14 1 5 13 1258 1455 99 24 96.666229 counsel 5 1 14 1 5 14 1367 1455 47 24 96.549355 will 5 1 14 1 5 15 1425 1455 30 24 97.018799 be 4 1 14 1 6 0 234 1490 814 33 -1 5 1 14 1 6 1 234 1490 116 31 96.400383 prepared 5 1 14 1 6 2 359 1494 25 20 96.750427 to 5 1 14 1 6 3 394 1495 122 26 96.872978 represent 5 1 14 1 6 4 524 1491 40 24 96.926399 the 5 1 14 1 6 5 574 1491 73 24 96.633614 client 5 1 14 1 6 6 656 1495 23 20 96.958534 at 5 1 14 1 6 7 688 1491 39 24 96.996056 the 5 1 14 1 6 8 737 1495 57 21 96.759384 next 5 1 14 1 6 9 803 1492 131 24 96.128944 scheduled 5 1 14 1 6 10 943 1492 105 31 96.128944 hearing. 2 1 15 0 0 0 234 1567 1226 225 -1 3 1 15 1 0 0 234 1567 1226 225 -1 4 1 15 1 1 0 285 1567 1175 32 -1 5 1 15 1 1 1 285 1568 26 30 96.421234 2) 5 1 15 1 1 2 385 1567 25 24 95.856667 If 5 1 15 1 1 3 415 1568 107 24 96.866737 retained 5 1 15 1 1 4 532 1568 99 24 96.681183 counsel 5 1 15 1 1 5 642 1568 20 25 96.961746 is 5 1 15 1 1 6 673 1569 153 30 96.529091 substituting 5 1 15 1 1 7 836 1569 24 24 96.836273 in 5 1 15 1 1 8 869 1569 38 24 96.836273 for 5 1 15 1 1 9 916 1569 106 25 96.898140 retained 5 1 15 1 1 10 1032 1570 99 24 96.802383 counsel 5 1 15 1 1 11 1142 1578 14 16 96.829041 a 5 1 15 1 1 12 1165 1570 153 25 96.752792 substitution 5 1 15 1 1 13 1328 1571 30 24 96.912506 of 5 1 15 1 1 14 1364 1571 96 24 96.873833 counsel 4 1 15 1 2 0 235 1605 1197 34 -1 5 1 15 1 2 1 235 1605 63 24 93.247017 form 5 1 15 1 2 2 308 1606 133 30 92.553223 (MC-050) 5 1 15 1 2 3 452 1606 86 31 96.449173 signed 5 1 15 1 2 4 547 1607 32 30 96.896805 by 5 1 15 1 2 5 589 1614 55 16 96.806458 new 5 1 15 1 2 6 653 1607 107 29 96.796707 counsel, 5 1 15 1 2 7 770 1607 41 24 96.986183 old 5 1 15 1 2 8 821 1608 100 24 96.869995 counsel 5 1 15 1 2 9 931 1608 46 24 96.971840 and 5 1 15 1 2 10 986 1608 40 24 97.007698 the 5 1 15 1 2 11 1036 1608 72 24 96.887756 client 5 1 15 1 2 12 1117 1616 56 23 96.718513 may 5 1 15 1 2 13 1183 1609 30 24 96.971710 be 5 1 15 1 2 14 1223 1608 60 25 96.961601 filed 5 1 15 1 2 15 1293 1609 24 24 96.721878 in 5 1 15 1 2 16 1327 1609 48 24 96.449524 lieu 5 1 15 1 2 17 1384 1609 28 24 96.449524 of 5 1 15 1 2 18 1418 1617 14 16 96.563004 a 4 1 15 1 3 0 235 1643 1207 28 -1 5 1 15 1 3 1 235 1643 87 25 96.876968 formal 5 1 15 1 3 2 332 1644 100 24 96.786522 motion. 5 1 15 1 3 3 444 1644 50 24 96.587799 The 5 1 15 1 3 4 504 1644 63 25 96.630791 form 5 1 15 1 3 5 577 1649 64 20 96.395332 must 5 1
6.721878 in 5 1 15 1 2 16 1327 1609 48 24 96.449524 lieu 5 1 15 1 2 17 1384 1609 28 24 96.449524 of 5 1 15 1 2 18 1418 1617 14 16 96.563004 a 4 1 15 1 3 0 235 1643 1207 28 -1 5 1 15 1 3 1 235 1643 87 25 96.876968 formal 5 1 15 1 3 2 332 1644 100 24 96.786522 motion. 5 1 15 1 3 3 444 1644 50 24 96.587799 The 5 1 15 1 3 4 504 1644 63 25 96.630791 form 5 1 15 1 3 5 577 1649 64 20 96.395332 must 5 1 15 1 3 6 650 1645 30 24 96.980705 be 5 1 15 1 3 7 690 1645 59 24 96.881439 filed 5 1 15 1 3 8 759 1645 57 24 96.881439 with 5 1 15 1 3 9 825 1646 40 23 96.887100 the 5 1 15 1 3 10 875 1650 67 20 96.765442 court 5 1 15 1 3 11 952 1646 46 24 96.765442 and 5 1 15 1 3 12 1008 1647 85 23 96.975952 served 5 1 15 1 3 13 1103 1654 32 17 96.762260 on 5 1 15 1 3 14 1144 1647 31 24 96.689606 all 5 1 15 1 3 15 1186 1647 99 24 96.863747 counsel 5 1 15 1 3 16 1296 1651 22 20 97.005234 at 5 1 15 1 3 17 1328 1647 58 24 96.904526 least 5 1 15 1 3 18 1394 1651 48 20 96.795036 two 4 1 15 1 4 0 235 1682 1168 32 -1 5 1 15 1 4 1 235 1682 82 24 93.224167 weeks 5 1 15 1 4 2 327 1682 83 24 96.831001 before 5 1 15 1 4 3 420 1690 47 23 96.283760 any 5 1 15 1 4 4 478 1683 130 24 96.732666 scheduled 5 1 15 1 4 5 619 1687 66 20 96.725906 court 5 1 15 1 4 6 694 1683 105 31 96.740608 hearing. 5 1 15 1 4 7 810 1684 126 30 96.820465 Normally 5 1 15 1 4 8 946 1684 65 24 96.898682 there 5 1 15 1 4 9 1020 1685 51 23 96.341240 will 5 1 15 1 4 10 1081 1685 30 24 96.907036 be 5 1 15 1 4 11 1120 1693 32 16 96.887939 no 5 1 15 1 4 12 1162 1685 158 24 96.600975 continuance 5 1 15 1 4 13 1330 1685 31 24 96.972054 of 5 1 15 1 4 14 1366 1686 37 23 97.018379 the 4 1 15 1 5 0 234 1721 1177 33 -1 5 1 15 1 5 1 234 1721 140 30 96.562866 previously 5 1 15 1 5 2 385 1721 131 24 96.308296 scheduled 5 1 15 1 5 3 526 1721 99 31 96.308296 hearing 5 1 15 1 5 4 635 1729 25 17 96.891670 as 5 1 15 1 5 5 670 1729 14 16 96.891670 a 5 1 15 1 5 6 693 1722 124 24 96.889534 condition 5 1 15 1 5 7 827 1722 30 24 96.283974 of 5 1 15 1 5 8 862 1722 39 24 96.283974 the 5 1 15 1 5 9 912 1723 74 24 96.607620 Court 5 1 15 1 5 10 996 1723 125 31 96.607620 accepting 5 1 15 1 5 11 1131 1723 39 24 96.889702 the 5 1 15 1 5 12 1180 1723 161 25 96.061974 substitution. 5 1 15 1 5 13 1350 1724 61 24 96.470306 New 4 1 15 1 6 0 235 1759 1023 33 -1 5 1 15 1 6 1 235 1759 100 24 96.719078 counsel 5 1 15 1 6 2 346 1759 49 24 96.915596 will 5 1 15 1 6 3 406 1759 30 24 96.960983 be 5 1 15 1 6 4 445 1760 115 30 96.820091 prepared 5 1 15 1 6 5 570 1763 25 20 96.830887 to 5 1 15 1 6 6 605 1764 120 26 96.876541 represent 5 1 15 1 6 7 734 1760 39 24 96.533203 the 5 1 15 1 6 8 783 1760 73 24 96.533203 client 5 1 15 1 6 9 865 1765 23 19 96.863487 at 5 1 15 1 6 10 897 1761 40 23 96.347267 the 5 1 15 1 6 11 946 1765 57 20 96.468826 next 5 1 15 1 6 12 1013 1761 130 24 96.468826 scheduled 5 1 15 1 6 13 1153 1762 105 30 96.128540 hearing. 2 1 16 0 0 0 185 1815 1181 100 -1 3 1 16 1 0 0 185 1815 1181 100 -1 4 1 16 1 1 0 185 1815 1181 100 -1 5 1 16 1 1 1 185 1874 119 23 96.693192 DATED: 5 1 16 1 1 2 316 1874 60 30 96.975975 May 5 1 16 1 1 3 385 1875 40 28 96.472664 28, 5 1 16 1 1 4 435 1875 64 23 96.472664 2015 5 1 16 1 1 5 882 1815 184 100 16.105461 Me, 5 1 16 1 1 6 1131 1815 235 100 39.480103 Well 2 1 17 0 0 0 1341 419 177 38 -1 3 1 17 1 0 0 1341 419 177 38 -1 4 1 17 1 1 0 1341 419 177 38 -1 5 1 17 1 1 1 1341 419 31 31 91.871216 K. 5 1 17 1 1 2 1384 421 134 36 96.137352 Cardinal 2 1 18 0 0 0 882 1904 597 4 -1 3 1 18 1 0 0 882 1904 597 4 -1 4 1 18 1 1 0 882 1904 597 4 -1 5 1 18 1 1 1 882 1904 597 4 95.000000 2 1 19 0 0 0 984 1915 410 31 -1 3 1 19 1 0 0 984 1915 410 31 -1 4 1 19 1 1 0 984 1915 410 31 -1 5 1 19 1 1 1 984 1915 124 30 96.487366 Presiding 5 1 19 1 1 2 1117 1915 76 31 96.729752 Judge 5 1 19 1 1 3 1202 1915 110 24 96.872322 Juvenile 5 1 19 1 1 4 1322 1916 72 24 96.810402 Court 2 1 20 0 0 0 1520 435 19 24 -1 3 1 20 1 0 0 1520 435 19 24 -1 4 1 20 1 1 0 1520 435 19 24 -1 5 1 20 1 1 1 1520 435 19 24 62.192963 e
Page 207¶
Standing Order 1.3
Renumbered as 1.3 per 11-3-22 Order
Page 208¶
11 12 13 14 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Standing Order 1.4
| LE
DEC 16 2019 K. @IEKER CLERK OF THE COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA JUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, TD=sepeten, Deputy Cenk MimAleAt SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA In re Family Law Contempt Proceedings ORDER DIRECTING COMMISSIONER TO CONDUCT CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
- Any commissioner assigned to hear family law contempt proceedings shall conduct
arraignment proceedings on an Order to Show Cause and Affidavit for Contempt, including the
issuance and signing of bench warrants. (Cal. Gov. C., § 72190.1.)
De Any commissioner assigned to hear family law contempt proceedings, and who is not acting
as a temporary judge per stipulation of the parties in those proceedings, shall hear and report his or
her findings and conclusions to the court on issues of fact in contempt proceedings related to
support, dissolution of marriage, nullity of marriage, or legal separation. (Cal. Code of Civ. Proc., §
259, subd. (e).)
/
It is so ordered. } Dated: afis/9 pF S Bary Baskin, Presiding Judge Page | of |
Page 209¶
Standing Order 1.5
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA a= | LL E D
DATE: November 3, 2022 DEPARTMENT 1 NOV - 3 2022
JUDGE: REBECCA C. HARDIE COURT CLERK: k ween chem oF tHE CouRT
UNREPORTED sec
ORDER RE: STANDING ORDERS
The Court has revised and substantially eliminated the majority of its previously-
enacted standing orders. By this Order, | rescind the final few standing orders which
are outdated or no longer applicable, and renumber all remaining standing orders.
Barring further order of the Presiding Judge, and to preserve the tracking and
publication of all orders as required by the Rules of Court and Code of Civil Procedure
section 575.1(c), standing orders must be submitted to the Presiding Judge for
approval, with the advice of the Executive Committee as determined by the Presiding
Judge.
The following standing orders are rescinded:
- Standing Order 1.1
- Standing Order 5.11
- Standing Order 6.20 Per Code of Civil Procedure section 575.1(c), which requires orders to be numbered sequentially on a common subject, Standing Orders — including this order — shall be recategorized and renumbered as follows: Section 1: Judicial Authority ° 1.1: Designation of Alternate Judges to Authorize Interception of Wire Communications ° 1.2: Substitution of Attorneys in Juvenile Court Dependency Cases ° 1.3: Order Regarding Unlawful Detainer Cases ° 1.4: Order Directing Commissioners to Conduct Contempt Proceedings e 1.5: Order re Standing Orders Section 2: Records and Records Access ° 2.1: Standing Order (Probate) Re: Release of Information for the Benefit of Minors ° 2.2: Order and Agreement re Preservation of Court Records e 2.3: Order to Purge Misdemeanor Arrest and Bench Warrants
Page 210¶
2.4: Order to Recall All Outstanding Bench Warrants Issued on Unsigned Citations 2.5: Order re Release of Information Pertaining to Minors Descried but Section 601 or 602 of the Welfare and Institutions Code 2.6: Courtesy Copies to DA Office for 827 File Review Requests 2.7: Confidentiality of Court Records; Local Inmates and Petitions for Involuntary Psychiatric Medication Section 3: Filing and Filing Dates 3.1: Facsimile Filing in Certain Juvenile Cases 3.2 E-Filing in Civil Cases Section 4: General Orders 4.1: Order Regarding Return of Dangerous, Toxic, Biohazardous Materials/Exhibits 4.2: Order Authorizing Children and Family Services Bureau to Regularly Photograph Dependent Children for Identification and Documentation Purposes 4.3: Court Reporters in Family Law Cases Additional Standing Orders shall follow consecutively in number within categories. Categories may be added by the Presiding Judge, in consultation with the Executive Committee as determined by the Presiding Judge. Standing Orders shall be included with the regular publication of the Local Rules and posted on the Local Rules section of the Court’s website. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 3, 2022 : 1. r Kibetth 7 HON. REBECCA C. HARDIE Presiding Judge of the Superior Court Contra Costa County
Page 211¶
Standing Order 1.6 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA Date: January 30, 2024 DEPARTMENT 1 JUDGE: EDWARD G. WEIL COURT CLERK: CAROLINE RUARO UNREPORTED STANDING ORDER RE: SUBORDINATE JUDICIAL OFFICERS For many years, the Court has benefitted from the service of subordinate judicial officers who handle specific matters on behalf of the Court, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 259, Government Code sections 71290, 71290,1, and 71622, and other applicable statutes and case law. To clarify the scope and authority of subordinate judicial officers in the Contra Costa Superior Court, IT IS ORDERED:
- In the event any person is hired by the Court and takes the Oath of Office for a Commissioner of the California Superior Court (a “Commissioner’), the Presiding Judge shall issue an order of appointment which shall be entered into the minutes of the Court.
- A Commissioner shall have authority to hear those matters described in Code of Civil Procedure section 259 and Government Code sections 72190 and 72190. 1, including infraction matters, small claims matters, and arraignments, and any other matters which a subordinate judicial officer may hear pursuant to statute.
- A Commissioner shall have authority to hear civil harassment, unlawful detainer, and civil discovery matters upon stipulation of the parties.
- A Commissioner shall have the authority to hear Department of Child Support Services matters as provided under Family Code section 4251.
- Prior to exercising any power to hear the above matters, a Commissioner must satisfy any qualification and/or training requirements of the Judicial Council as may be established under Government Code sections 71622(c) and (d).
- Authority to act as a Commissioner shall expire immediately upon the Commissioner's retirement, resignation, or termination of service. The Presiding Judge shall issue an order of termination, which shall be entered into the minutes of the Court.
Page 212¶
- By separate order, the Presiding Judge may assign a retired Commissioner to subordinate judicial service as provided in Government Code section 71622(g). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 30, 2024 LCL 4] HON. EDWARD G. WEIL Presiding Judge of the Superior Court Contra Costa County
Page 213¶
Standing Order 1.7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA DATE: JULY 24, 2024 DEPARTMENT 1 JUDGE: HON. EDWARD G. WEIL COURT CLERK: CAROLINE RUARO UNREPORTED STANDING ORDER 1.7 IMPLEMENTING CALIFORNIA RULE OF COURT 10.635 This Standing Order implements Rule of Court 10.635. It does not apply in criminal proceedings or other proceedings identified in Code of Civil Procedure section 367.76, which include, but are not limited to, juvenile justice proceedings and Lanterman-Petris- Short Act proceedings.
- Presiding from Chambers or Locations in a Courthouse Other Than a Courtroom Pursuant to CRC 10.635(d), the Presiding Judge hereby finds that it is in the interest of justice for a judicial officer to preside remotely from a location within a court facility, other than a courtroom, as long as no parties are appearing in person. Case-by- case approval by the Presiding Judge is not required. If the proceeding is one that is required by law to be open to the public, the remote access link shall be accessible to the public on a listen-only basis.
- Presiding From a Location Outside the Courthouse a. Pursuant to CRC 10.635(e), the Presiding judge hereby finds that it is in the interest of justice for a judicial officer to preside from a location outside a courthouse (including their residence), and that so presiding is “essential to prevent a significant delay that would substantially prejudice the litigants,” where all of the following conditions exist: (i) The judicial officer has a medical or family emergency occurring since the original setting of the proceeding that would require the proceeding to be continued at a substantial prejudice to the parties. If the judicial officer is physically ill and/or precluded from entering the courthouse by COVID or other infectious disease protocols, they must be well enough to preside over the proceeding. This does not permit presiding from outside the courthouse in order to accommodate routine appointments or where presiding from the courtroom would merely inconvenience the judicial officer.
Page 214¶
(ii) The location outside the courthouse is appropriate for a court hearing, i.e., it is sufficiently quiet, the location has functioning and appropriate technology to enable the hearing to proceed with needed visual and sound quality, and anything visible in the background is appropriate for a judicial proceeding. Locations other than the judicial officer's residence, including but not limited to waiting rooms, airports, or motor vehicles, are presumptively inappropriate. (iii) The location is within the State of California. (iv) The judicial officer obtains approval from their supervising judge, who shall determine whether the criteria of this policy are met. b. The requirement of Government Code 68110 which requires that every judge “shall, in open court during the presentation of causes before him or her, wear a judicial robe,” applies to remote proceedings as it would in the courthouse, i.e., if the proceeding would require a robe in the courthouse, it is required for a remote proceeding. Matters typically conducted in chambers, e.g., settlement conferences, do not require a robe. If the proceeding is being held remotely due to an emergency that prevented the judge from obtaining a robe, the judge may proceed without wearing a robe. c. Approval to preside from outside the courthouse pursuant to the “hazardous conditions” provision of CRC10.635(e)(1) must be obtained in each individual case by the Presiding Judge, or if unavailable, the Assistant Presiding Judge, or if unavailable, the Supervising Judge. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 24, 2024 LC. CA_-f HON. EDWARD G.WEIL Presiding Judge of the Superior Court Contra Costa County
Page 215¶
Standing Order 1.8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA E [LE GENERAL ORDER RE: USE OF DEC 30 2024 ELECTRONIC RECORDING woeaneline Seine duer EQUIPMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, By. Deputy Clerk Just six years ago, our Supreme Court warned that “the absence of a court reporter at trial court proceedings and the resulting lack of a verbatim record of such proceedings will frequently be fatal to a litigant’s ability to [appeal].” (Jameson v. Desta (2018) 5 Cal.5th 594, 608.) The Supreme Court thereby invalidated a Superior Court’s practice of requiring indigent parties to arrange and pay for a court reporter. (/d. at pp. 611, 623.) The Jameson decision was just one of many instances in which California courts have struck down or rejected laws, rules, doctrines, and policies that might “significantly chill [a] litigant’s enjoyment of the fundamental protections of the right to appeal.” (Coleman v. Gulf Ins. Group (1986) 41 Cal.3d 782, 797.) “The State of California is not constitutionally required to establish avenues of appellate review, ‘but it is now fundamental that, once established, these avenues must be kept free of unreasoned distinctions that can only impede open and equal access to the courts.’ [Citation.]” (In re Arthur N. (1974) 36 Cal.App.3d 935, 939.) GENERAL ORDER RE USE OF ELECTRONIC RECORDING EQUIPMENT p.1
Page 216¶
The Contra Costa Superior Court (“Court”) can no longer reliably staff its courtrooms with court-employed certified shorthand reporters (“CSRs”) because ofa chronic shortage of CSRs available to be hired. Without a CSR, vast numbers of litigants are left without a verbatim transcript—or even any verbatim record—of what occurred in hearings that may have a profound impact on their rights and lives. This leaves the Court little choice. To preserve the constitutional rights of litigants and to carry out the Court's duty to process civil cases expeditiously, this General Order permits judges of the Court to authorize electronic recording (“ER”) of proceedings in which fundamental rights are at stake. I. Like other courts across the state, the Court faces a crisis in CSR availability that has compromised its ability to provide CSRs where needed, despite its best efforts in recruitment and retention. Under current law, the Court is obligated to provide CSRs for felonies; juvenile justice and dependency proceedings; upon request by indigent litigants with an approved fee waiver; and in certain other proceedings.’ To provide such coverage, the Court has been forced to remove CSRs from its family law, probate, and unlimited civil departments. Where its own CSRs are not available, the Court has tried to provide CSRs on an ad hoc basis—by the hour, by the day, or for a given hearing upon special request by the judicial officer. But this stopgap measure has proven inadequate, the Court cannot guarantee the ability to maintain it going forward, and there is likewise no ' The facts set forth in this order are based on the Declaration of Court Executive Officer Kate Bieker, dated December 30, 2024. GENERAL ORDER RE USE OF ELECTRONIC RECORDING EQUIPMENT p.2
Page 217¶
guarantee that the available hourly or daily reporters will consistently fill the ever- increasing need for reporter coverage. The shrinking of the number of CSRs available to be hired has been evident for years, drawing persistent warnings from judiciary and legislative leaders, as well as from access-to-justice non-profits and other similar organizations. Indeed, very recently, the Court received a demand from one local legal-aid nonprofit to immediately begin using electronic recording for all civil case types, based on the constitutional crisis identified in this order. This mirrors efforts similar agencies have made at the Legislature to amend section 69957. Presiding Judges and Court Executive Officers throughout the state encouraged the Legislature to take up bills to address this crisis, but those proposed — such as SB 662, introduced in 2023, which would have expanded the use of ER to other proceedings when no court reporter was available — did not advance. As a result, for those litigants who cannot obtain a CSR because of the shortage and whose cases do not qualify for ER under section 69957, even when their fundamental rights are at stake no one makes a verbatim record of all the proceedings. The Court’s experience with hiring and retention of CSRs has been no different. The Court currently employs 14 full-time and 3 part-time CSRs for up to 17 departments where statutory mandates require CSRs. The total number of CSRs is down from 33 full-time and 4 part-time reporters in 2019, a loss of over 50%. Further, the total of 17 departments excludes additional departments which, on occasion, may hear cases requiring CSRs (e.g., a civil department hearing a criminal matter, a visiting judge hearing a criminal matter). 10 of the 17 currently-employed CSRs are retirement- p. 3
Page 218¶
eligible. While the court has 10 active per diem reporters for further additional assistance, by the very nature of their position their availability is not guaranteed. Efforts the Court has undertaken to encourage applications and retention have not resulted in an increase in CSR staff. The Court has paid percentage-of-salary retention bonuses in this fiscal year and the two previous: e 10% of six months’ salary in FY 2022-2023, ranging from $4,794.78 through $5,993.48 per CSR; e 5% of six month’s salary in FY 2023-2024, $2,379.39 through 2,996.74 per CSR; and © 5% of annual salary in FY 2024-2025, ranging from $2,911.12 through $6,113.35 per CSR. Additionally, in Fiscal Year 2022-2023, the Court paid a one-time retention bonus of $10,000 to all CSRs. The Court’s staff have attended job fairs, advertised in CSR- related media, and taken out billboards and other advertising to recruit new CSRs. And finally, the Court will shortly open a CSR internship program, with three applicants so far, though this will only impact the Court’s overall shortage if applicants complete the program, become licensed, and ultimately work for the Court as opposed to another employer. In sum, after all the efforts at recruitment and retention, the Court's current CSR staffing between 2019 and now shows a net loss of 20 reporters. The solution to this immediate crisis cannot be found exclusively in further recruitment efforts. And the practical result of this shortage is that many hearings proceed without a CSR, and without a verbatim record. Between January 1, 2023, and November 22, 2024, the p. 4
Page 219¶
Court has held 81,480 hearings without a CSR in its Civil, Family, and Probate departments. Il. Permitting ER in misdemeanors, infractions, and similar cases, while denying it for felonies, juvenile proceedings, and other matters involving fundamental rights and liberty interests, violates the United States and California constitutions. The Legislature permits courts to use ER to create a verbatim record of proceedings in misdemeanor, infraction, and limited civil cases but has prohibited ER in any other case type. (Gov. Code, § 69957.) The Court regularly uses ER recording, or transcripts obtained from those recordings, as the record for appellate review in its Appellate Division. The Court heard 77 appeals in 2023 and 76 in 2024 to-date. The vast majority of these relied on ER recordings or transcripts of ER recordings without negative impact on the ability of the Division to render decisions on the appeals. Additionally, the Court has outfitted all of its courtrooms with updated electronic recording and audio technology to ensure that each department can produce usable, accurate audio recordings. But in cases where section 69957 does not permit ER, and where no CSR is reasonably available due to the CSR shortage, litigants are unable to obtain a more reliable verbatim transcript. Instead, the statute operates to effectively deny them any verbatim transcript at all, which “will frequently be fatal to a litigant’s ability to [appeal].” (Jameson, supra, 5 Cal.5th at p. 608.) There is no constitutionally sufficient justification to permitting ER in the cases identified in section 69957 but not in other cases where a verbatim record would not p.5
Page 220¶
otherwise be available without ER. Indeed, the Court of Appeal has struck down such a distinction in the past, holding that where verbatim transcription is provided to felony defendants, “statutes, which permit the municipal court to deny defendants of misdemeanor criminal actions the availability of a phonographic reporter, or an electronic recording device, or some equivalent means of reasonably assuring an accurate verbatim account of the courtroom proceedings, fail to comport with constitutional principles of due process and equal protection of the laws.” (See In re Armstrong (1981) 126 Cal.App.3d 565, 572-574, original italics [finding the denial violated both the U.S. Constitution and Article 1, section 7 of the California constitution].) Permitting ER in certain proceedings but forbidding it in others, especially where those other proceedings implicate constitutionally protected fundamental rights and liberty interests of the litigants, violates the constitutions of the United States and the State of California. This legislative discrimination is not narrowly tailored to meet a compelling state interest as required by a constitutionally mandated strict scrutiny analysis. (/n re Arthur N. (1974) 36 Cal.App.3d 935, 939 [“In cases touching upon fundamental interests of the individual, the state bears the burden of establishing not only that it has a compelling interest which justifies the suspect classification, but also that the distinctions drawn by the regulation are necessary to further its purpose.”].) Indeed, the Court seriously doubts that there is any valid justification for depriving litigants of a verbatim transcript when a technological means for providing one is readily available, especially where that means is authorized and used in other case types. GENERAL ORDER RE USE OF ELECTRONIC RECORDING EQUIPMENT p.6
Page 221¶
Il. Proceedings in which litigants cannot obtain a record implicate their fundamental rights, and therefore raise constitutional concerns when a verbatim record is unavailable. “It has long been the law that courts have inherent authority to determine whether statutes enacted by the Legislature transcend the limits imposed by either federal or state Constitutions... It is the duty of courts to maintain supremacy of the Constitution.” (Byers v. Board of Supervisors (1968) 262 Cal.App.2d 148, 157, citing Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch (U.S.) 137.) Accordingly, judicial officers may conclude that, on the facts of the case before them, they have a duty to not to enforce statutory provisions, such as section 69957, where doing so would constitute a constitutional violation. Each of the case types to which this order applies implicates the fundamental rights of the litigants involved: e A juvenile’s right to appeal “deeply involves the minor’s fundamental interests.” (/n re Arthur N., supra, 36 Cal.App.3d, at 939.) ° The Family Code, the Probate Code, and the Code of Civil Procedure provide separate statutory rights to appeal. (See Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §902; §904(a)(1), (10), (14). Where such appeal rights are provided, they must be kept free on unreasoned distinctions that impeded equal access to the courts. (/n re Arthur N., supra, at 939.) e Non-criminal restraining order cases heard in both the Civil and Family Law departments can result in orders that materially impact a party’s fundamental rights, such as freedom of speech, freedom of movement, the right to possess firearms, and the right to free association. GENERAL ORDER RE USE OF ELECTRONIC RECORDING EQUIPMENT p.7
Page 222¶
e Finally, orders to show cause for civil and family contempt for willful violation of a court orders also implicate fundamental rights in that they expose individuals to criminal penalties: fines up to $1,000 and incarceration for up to 5 days. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 1218.) In each of these case types, where a CSR is not available, a judicial officer faces the conflict between the prohibition of ER under section 69957 and the litigant’s fundamental constitutional rights to preservation of a record for appeal. IV. Alternatives to ER are insufficient to provide the required constitutional safeguards to litigants. At present, no reasonable alternatives other than ER exist for litigants whose matters are not reported. Those that do exist are alternatively unrealistic, constitutionally infirm, or both. First, a litigant could try to retain a private CSR. But this is often prohibitively expensive for all but the wealthiest of litigants. Hinging the availability of a record on a litigant’s relative ability to pay violates a litigant’s due process and equal protection rights. A litigant could also continue a matter until a CSR is available. But this can prejudicially delay the administration of justice, an especially dangerous problem in cases where immediate court action is essential — such as restraining orders, child custody decisions, and creation or elimination of conservatorships upon vulnerable adults. The Court has a duty to expeditiously process its civil cases. (Jameson, supra, 179 Cal.App.4th 672, 684; see Apollo v. Gyaami (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 1468, 1487.) Continuing urgent cases when ER is available to provide a verbatim record does not p.8
Page 223¶
satisfy that duty. And, finally, the question arises: continue to when? With an ever- decreasing availability of CSRs, there is simply no guarantee that a continuance would result in a court reporter being available for the rescheduled hearing, magnifying the due process problem of using continuances in this fashion. Finally, litigants could attempt to use the settled statement process. (See Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 8.137.) But courts have recognized the inherent problems that exist with settled statements — problems which can become due process violations when those statements become the only available option. Not all issues are appropriate for settled statements because the parties cannot necessarily predict all issues that may arise. (See Jameson, supra, 5 Cal.5th at p. 622, fn. 20 [“There is, however, generally no way to determine in advance what issues may arise or whether such an issue can be raised and decided on appeal absent a verbatim record of the trial court proceedings.”].) And this presumes the parties could agree on the statement. If they do not, settling a statement then requires a post hoc reconstruction of the record based on the memories of proceedings occurring weeks or months prior, which are of ever-decreasing reliability. (See Armstrong, supra, 126 Cal.App.3d at p. 573.) While settled statements are useful where the parties agree to the option of their use, forcing them on parties to avoid a problem much more easily resolvable by ER is an unjustified and unnecessary invitation for infringement of a litigant’s constitutional protections. V. Finding of Fact and Conclusions of Law Based on the foregoing, the Court FINDS as follows:
- California provides a statutory right of appeal in family law, probate, and civil proceedings. GENERAL ORDER RE USE OF ELECTRONIC RECORDING EQUIPMENT p.9
Page 224¶
Family law, probate, and civil litigants have fundamental due process interests in court proceedings involving the status of their marriage, the parentage and custody of their children, certain conservatorship and guardianship matters, their rights under restraining orders, and civil and family contempt proceedings. The absence of a verbatim record will frequently be fatal to litigants’ ability to appeal from adverse decisions in such proceedings. The Court is unable to reliably supply a court-employed CSR to its family law, probate, or civil departments given the Court’s shortage of court-employed CSRs and its legal obligation to provide court-employed CSRs in other matters. The Court has undertaken reasonable steps to attempt to retain and hire more CSRs, but those attempts have been unsuccessful and are likely to remain unsuccessful. There is no basis to believe that, either in the short or long term, the Court will be able to hire sufficient CSRs to reliably staff its family law, probate, and civil departments. At present, they do not exist to be hired. Government Code section 69957 permits ER for infraction, criminal misdemeanor, and limited civil matters for the purpose of creating a verbatim record of proceedings. This is a reasonable alternative for the creation of a verbatim record of proceedings via ER technology in the absence of an available CSR. GENERAL ORDER RE USE OF ELECTRONIC RECORDING EQUIPMENT p. 10
Page 225¶
The Court’s Appellate Division successfully reviewed and decided appeals when ER was used to create a record of infraction, criminal misdemeanor, and limited civil matters for the purpose of creating a verbatim transcript. In contrast to how it permits litigants to protect their appellate rights in infraction, criminal misdemeanor, and limited civil matters, section 69957 prohibits electronic recording of family law, probate, and civil matters, even those involving constitutionally protected fundamental rights and liberty interests. Because of the shortage of court-employed CSRs and the prohibition of section 69957, the Court held 81,480 hearings in its Family, Civil, and Probate departments between January 1, 2023, and November 22, 2024, for which no verbatim record of proceedings could be made. More such hearings will likewise occur each year. As a result, the court reporter shortage has become an emergency and a crisis in appellate and, ultimately, constitutional rights. Attempts to persuade the California Legislature to amend the law to ameliorate this crisis have proven unsuccessful. As matters stand, when judicial officers of the Court enforce section 69957— such that there is no transcript available to vast numbers of family law, probate, and civil litigants when a court employed CSR is not available for assignment to a family law, probate, and civil departments in matters implicating constitutionally protected rights and liberty interests—they do so even though ER technology is in place which could create a verbatim record. GENERAL ORDER RE USE OF ELECTRONIC RECORDING EQUIPMENT p. 11
Page 226¶
The distinction section 69957 draws among classes of litigants can result in family law, probate, and civil litigants suffering actual and serious constitutional harms on account of this legislative discrimination. This discrimination is not narrowly tailored to meet a compelling government interest, as would be required under the strict scrutiny analysis applicable to regulations which implicate the fundamental constitutional rights of litigants to due process and equal protection. There is no compelling government interest in permitting electronic recording for certain cases but not for others, especially when the class of cases where recording is not permitted implicate fundamental rights and interests. Nor is section 69957 narrowly tailored, because it forbids recording in classes of cases even where a CSR is unavailable; minimally, it could allow for electronic recording in those circumstances. Instead of needlessly restricting the appellate rights of litigants in matters touching upon fundamental constitutional rights and liberty interests, the Court has a reasonable alternative method of permitting the creation of a verbatim transcript of proceedings via electronic recording technology. In the absence of a reasonably available CSR which will ameliorate or eliminate the constitutional violations, the judges of the Court should have the option to preserve and protect constitutional rights rather than limit and impinge upon them. GENERAL ORDER RE USE OF ELECTRONIC RECORDING EQUIPMENT p. 12
Page 227¶
Vi. Order Accordingly, the Presiding Judge hereby ORDERS the Clerk of Court to direct Deputy Clerks, beginning on January 6, 2025, to operate the electronic recording equipment in family law, probate and civil departments as directed by the judicial officer presiding in such department when that judicial officer finds that: (1) the proceeding concerns matters that implicate fundamental rights or liberty rights as described herein; (2) one or more parties wishes to have the possibility of creating a verbatim transcript of the proceedings; (3) no official court-employed CSR is reasonably available to report the proceeding; (4) the party so requesting has been unable to secure the presence of a private CSR to report the proceeding because such CSR was not reasonably available or on account of that party’s reasonable inability to pay; (5) the proceeding involves significant legal and/or factual issues such that a verbatim record is likely necessary to create a record of sufficient completeness; and (6) the proceeding should not, in the interests of justice, be further delayed. This order shall not apply to proceedings under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act or to any proceeding where electronic recording is permitted by statute. This Order will remain in effect until otherwise ordered by the Presiding Judge. Dated: December 30, 2024 LC LA HON. EDWARD G. WEIL Presiding Judge of the Superior Court Contra Costa County p. 13
Page 228¶
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA DECLARATION OF COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICER KATE BIEKER
|, Kate Bieker, declare:
- | am the Executive Officer, Clerk of Court, and Jury Commissioner for the Contra Costa Superior Court (the Court). | have held this position since May 14, 2018.
| have personal knowledge of the facts contained in this declaration and would testify to
them if called upon to do so. 2. Prior to joining the Contra Costa Superior Court, | worked for Deloitte & Touche, Shell Oil and Nextel. | have worked for the Court in positions including Human Resources, Court Finance, Court Operations, as Deputy Executive Officer, and now Court Executive Officer for 6 years. | am currently a member of the Judicial Council of California serving under the direction and supervision of the Chief Justice of California. | also serve on several statewide committees. | am the current co-chair of the Court Executive Association Committee. | am a graduate of Sonoma State University where | received my baccalaureate degree in Political Science. | have worked Declaration of Executive Officer Kate Bieker p.1
Page 229¶
in court administration and court operations at Contra Costa Superior Court for 18 years. 3. The Court is one of 58 superior courts in California. Its 38 judges and 4 commissioners operate in 6 courthouses supported by 304 full-time employees. The Court's judicial officers hear every type of case under California law — criminal, civil, family law, juvenile dependency and justice, probate, and mental health. 4. The Court can no longer continuously and reliably support its trial departments with court-employed certified shorthand reporters (“CSRs”) due to a chronic shortage in CSRs to be hired. For several years, | and other executive officers throughout the state, as well as presiding judges and other judicial leaders, have spoken about the ever-decreasing pool of CSRs available and the oncoming crisis it represented. Numerous court executive officers also released a statement on November 2, 2022, identifying the facts supporting the existence of the CSR shortage, describing why such a shortage would not be solved simply with more funding, and identifying the problems occasioned by the limitations on electronic recording set forth in Government Code section 66959. A copy of this statement, which | co-signed, is attached as Exhibit A. 5. Under current law, the Court is obligated to provide CSRs for felonies; juvenile justice and dependency proceedings; upon request by indigent litigants with an approved fee waiver (see Jameson v. Desta (2018) 5 Cal.5th 594, 599); and in certain other proceedings. To provide such coverage, the Court has been forced to remove CSRs from its family law, probate, and unlimited civil departments. Where its own CSRs are not available, the Court has tried to provide CSRs on an ad hoc basis—by the Declaration of Executive Officer Kate Bieker p.2
Page 230¶
hour, by the day, or for a given hearing upon special request by the judicial officer. 6. Others have recognized the ongoing crisis as well. The Court recently received a demand from one local legal-aid nonprofit to immediately begin using electronic recording for all civil case types. This mirrors efforts similar agencies have made at the Legislature to amend section 69957. Presiding Judges and Court Executive Officers throughout the state encouraged the Legislature to take up bills to address this crisis, but those proposed — such as SB 662, introduced in 2023, which would have expanded the use of ER to other proceedings when no court reporter was available — did not advance. As a result, for those litigants who cannot obtain a CSR because of the shortage and whose cases do not qualify for ER under section 69957, even when their fundamental rights are at stake no one makes a verbatim record of the proceedings. 7. In my role as Executive Officer, | directly supervise the manager of our CSRs. The Court currently employs 14 full-time and 3 part-time CSRs for up to 17 departments where statutory mandates require CSRs. The total number of CSRs is down from 33 full-time and 4 part-time reporters in 2019, a loss of over 50%. Further, the total of 17 departments excludes additional departments which, on occasion, may hear cases requiring CSRs (e.g., a civil department hearing a criminal matter, a visiting judge hearing a criminal matter). While the court has 10 active per diem reporters for further additional assistance, by the very nature of their position their availability is not guaranteed. 8. Also in my role as Executive Officer, | supervise the Court’s Human Resources Department. Of the 17 currently-employed CSRs, 10 are retirement-eligible. Declaration of Executive Officer Kate Bieker p.3
Page 231¶
- Efforts the Court has undertaken to encourage applications and retention have not resulted in an increase in CSR staff. The Court has paid percentage-of-salary retention bonuses in this fiscal year and the two previous: e 10% of six months’ salary in FY 2022-2023, ranging from $4,794.78 through $5,993.48 per CSR; e 5% of six month's salary in FY 2023-2024, $2,379.39 through 2,996.74 per CSR; and e 5% of annual salary in FY 2024-2025, ranging from $2,911.12 through $6,113.35 per CSR. Additionally, in Fiscal Year 2022-2023, the Court paid a one-time retention bonus of $10,000 to all CSRs.
- To encourage new applications, the Court’s Human Resources staff significantly increased its advertising and recruitment efforts. Staff have attended job fairs, advertised in CSR-related media, and taken out billboards and other advertising to recruit new CSRs. The Court will shortly open a CSR internship program, with three applicants so far. The direct impact of this program is to be determined based on whether applicants complete the program, become licensed, and ultimately work for the Court as opposed to another employer.
- The CSR shortage has resulted in a substantial number of cases proceeding without verbatim records. Between January 1, 2023, and November 22, 2024, the Court has held 81,480 hearings without a CSR in its Civil, Family, and Probate departments. Declaration of Executive Officer Kate Bieker p.4
Page 232¶
- Consistent with the commitment of our Court, its judges and staff, and the judiciary system in California generally to uphold equal access to the courts, and to support and defend both the United States and California Constitutions, | am obligated to provide sufficient CSR staffing to permit judicial officers to carry out their duties. Due to the crisis in CSR availability, | am unable to provide sufficient CSRs on a regular basis to ensure a verbatim record is captured in court proceedings.
- In my role as Clerk of Court, | supervise the manager of the civil clerk's office and the manager supporting our Appellate Division. The Court regularly uses electronic recording (“ER”), or transcripts obtained from those recordings, as the record for appellate review in its Appellate Division. The Court heard 77 appeals in 2023 and 76 in 2024 to-date. The vast majority of these relied on ER recordings or transcripts of ER recordings without negative impact on the ability of the Division to render decisions on the appeals.
- | The Court has outfitted its courtrooms with updated electronic recording and audio technology to ensure that each department can produce usable, accurate audio recordings. The Court made specific upgrades in 27 courtrooms which included:
- upgraded recording systems to ensure quality of ER; 2) upgraded speaker and microphone systems throughout the courtrooms; 3) installation of 65"/85” smart displays in each courtroom; 4) installation of display screens on counsel tables and witness stands; and 5) evidence presentation devices to display on the smart screens from counsel table.
- | The Court has successfully used electronic recording for appellate review in its appellate division and regularly in those cases where it is permitted under Declaration of Executive Officer Kate Bieker p.5
Page 233¶
Government Code section 66957. Based on this, it is my opinion that electronic recordings and transcripts derived from such recordings allow for appellate review of a verbatim record.
| declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing is true and correct, and that is declaration is executed this 30" day of December, 2024. KATE BIEKER Executive Officer / Clerk of Court Superior Court of California County of Contra Costa Declaration of Executive Officer Kate Bieker p.6
Page 234¶
Exhibit A
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 2, 2022
SUPERIOR COURTS OF CALIFORNIA
THERE IS A COURT REPORTER SHORTAGE CRISIS IN CALIFORNIA
Each day across California, tens of thousands of court hearings are held. Lawyers argue, witnesses testify, litigants tell their stories and judges make decisions. What many people do not appreciate is the crucial role played by a court reporter: creating and preserving a verbatim record of those exchanges. As a chronic shortage of court reporters reaches crisis levels, the statutory framework for court reporting must adjust to the new realities of the reporting profession.
THE PROBLEM: There is a court reporter shortage in California – and across the nation – that has been long developing.
• In 2005, the Judicial Council warned that, “since the early 1990’s, California’s courts have experienced a steady decline in the number of available qualified shorthand reporters. […] Additionally, the reduction of court reporting schools and curriculums in California over recent years complicates the courts’ ability to attract sufficient numbers of well-trained reporters. [2005, Reporting of the Record Task Force, Final Report, p. 6.] • Nationally, a 2013 study by the National Court Reporters Association projected that “Decreased enrollment and graduation rates for court reporters, combined with significant retirement rates, will create by 2018 a critical shortfall projected to represent nearly 5,500 court reporting positions.” [Ducker Worldwide, 2013-2014: Court Reporting Industry Outlook Report, Executive Summary, p. 5.] • In 2017, the Chief Justice’s Futures Commission Final Report warned, “National data show the number of skilled court reporters is decreasing. Certified court reporting schools have experienced smaller enrollment and graduation rates, which are declining by an annual average of 7.3 percent[…]” [Report to the Chief Justice: Commission on the Future of California’s Court System, p. 240.] • In 2018, the Judicial Council wrote to the Legislature that, “the state would […] have a gap of approximately 2,750 court reporters by 2023 if forecasted
Page 235¶
COURT REPORTER SHORTAGE CRISIS November 2, 2022 demand remains constant.” [March 29, 2018, letter from the Judicial Council to Hon. Lorena Gonzalez-Fletcher, Chair Assembly Appropriations Committee, re: Assembly Bill 2354.]
Today in California, only nine Certified Shorthand Reporter programs remain. In 2021, only 175 examinees took the licensing exam – and only 36 passed.
The result is a crisis in court reporter availability that has been developing for years.
THE SHORTAGE OF COURT REPORTERS IMPACTS LITIGANTS ACROSS CALIFORNIA:
In accordance with Penal Code § 190.9 and § 869, Code of Civil Procedure § 269 and Welfare and Institution Code § 347 and § 677, California courts must provide court reporters in felony criminal and dependency and delinquency juvenile courtrooms. Court reporters are not statutorily required to be provided by the courts in civil, family law, probate, misdemeanor criminal and traffic courtrooms.
And yet, many California courts do not have enough court reporters to cover mandated criminal felony matters – let alone the wide range of areas in which litigants need a record of court proceedings.
Over 50% of the California courts have reported that they are unable to routinely cover non-mandated case types including civil, family law and probate.
FUNDING IS NOT THE SOLUTION: There is no one to hire.
The Legislature provides $30 million annually to the California courts to hire additional court reporters, with a focus on family law and civil courtrooms. However, because of the decline in court reporters, the crisis continues.
Page 236¶
COURT REPORTER SHORTAGE CRISIS November 2, 2022
Today 71 percent of the state’s 58 trial courts are actively recruiting for court reporters: Alameda; Butte; Contra Costa; Del Norte; El Dorado; Fresno; Humboldt; Imperial; Kern; Lake; Los Angeles; Madera; Marin; Merced; Monterey; Nevada; Orange; Placer; Riverside; Sacramento; San Benito; San Bernardino; San Diego; San Francisco, San Joaquin; San Luis Obispo; San Mateo; Santa Barbara; Santa Clara; Santa Cruz; Shasta; Siskiyou; Solano; Sonoma; Stanislaus; Tehama; Tulare; Tuolumne; Ventura; Yolo; and Yuba.
THE CURRENT STATUTORY FRAMEWORK INHIBITS CREATIVE RESPONSES TO THE SHORTAGE OF COURT REPORTERS:
With the exception of limited civil, misdemeanor and infraction cases, Government Code § 69957 prohibits the courts from providing electronic recording in civil, family law and probate courtrooms.
Government Code § 69959 and Code of Civil Procedure § 367.75(d)(2)(A) mandate court reporters to be present in the courtrooms – rather than taking advantage of emerging technologies that would allow the court to provide this service remotely to multiple courtrooms throughout the county, providing more services with existing resources while making the profession more attractive to young, potential court reporters.
Government Code § 69942 requires all court reporters who work in a court to be certified in California which restricts courts from hiring out-of-state independent firms to provide this service.
CONCLUSION: More funding is not the solution.
We stand with our court reporters in recognizing and appreciating their value and service to the California judicial branch but we must acknowledge that we are facing a California – and national – court reporter shortage.
This shortage will not be solved by increased funding. Without changes to the current statutory framework for court reporting, all courts will face the inevitable day, already seen by a few California courts, of not having enough court reporters to cover the mandated felony criminal and juvenile dependency and delinquency cases.
Every litigant in California should have access to the record. Ideally, this would be provided by a court reporter but when none are available, other options need to be available to the courts. We are ready, able and willing to work with all stakeholders on finding ways to ensure that all litigants who need a record have access to one.
Page 237¶
COURT REPORTER SHORTAGE CRISIS November 2, 2022
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:
• U.S. Legal Support, Understanding the National Court Reporter Shortage and What it Means for Your Firm, [https://www.uslegalsupport.com/court - reporting/understanding-the-national-court-reporter-shortage-and-what-it- means-for-your-firm/] • Ducker Worldwide, Court Reporting Industry Outlook Report (2013 – 2014) [https://www.ncra.org/docs/default - source/uploadedfiles/education/schools/2013-14_ncra_-industry_outlook - (ducker)8ef018c4b8ea486e9f8638864df79109.pdf?sfvrsn=c7a531e2_0] • Commission on the Future of California’s Court System, Report to the Chief Justice, 2017, [https://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/futures-commission- final-report.pdf] • California Trial Court Consortium, The Causes, Consequences, and Outlook of the Court Reporter Shortage in California and Beyond, 2022, [https://www.siskiyou.courts.ca.gov/system/files?file=court-reporter - shortage-1-2022.pdf] the Court’s website):
CEO Chad Finke CEO Jake Chatters Alameda County Superior Court Placer County Superior Court
CEO Ann Greth CEO W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr. Alpine County Superior Court Riverside County Superior Court
CEO Sharif Elmallah CEO Lee Seale Butte County Superior Court Sacramento County Superior Court
CEO Erika F. Valencia CEO Tarry Singh Colusa County Superior Court San Benito County Superior Court
CEO Kate Bieker Interim CEO Carmen Trutanich Contra Costa County Superior Court San Bernardino County Superior Court
CEO Esperanza Esparza CEO Michael M. Roddy Del Norte County Superior Court San Diego County Superior Court
CEO Michael L. Elliott Interim CEO Mark Culkins Fresno County Superior Court San Francisco County Superior Court
CEO Diana Baca CEO Brandon E. Riley Glenn County Superior Court San Joaquin County Superior Court
Page 238¶
COURT REPORTER SHORTAGE CRISIS November 2, 2022
CEO Kim M. Bartleson CEO Michael Powell Humboldt County Superior Court San Luis Obispo County Superior Court
CEO Maria Rhinehart CEO Neal Taniguchi Imperial County Superior Court San Mateo County Superior Court
CEO Pam Foster CEO Darrel Parker Inyo County Superior Court Santa Barbara County Superior Court
CEO Tamarah Harber-Pickens CEO Rebecca Fleming Kern County Superior Court Santa Clara County Superior Court
CEO Nocona Soboleski CEO Alex Calvo Kings County Superior Court Santa Cruz County Superior Court
CEO Krista LeVier CEO Melissa Fowler-Bradley Lake County Superior Court Shasta County Superior Court
CEO Teresa Stalter CEO Ann Mendez Lassen County Superior Court Sierra County Superior Court
CEO Sherri R. Carter CEO Reneé McCanna Crane Los Angeles County Superior Court Siskiyou County Superior Court
CEO Adrienne Calip CEO Brian K. Taylor Madera County Superior Court Solano County Superior Court
CEO James Kim CEO Robert M. Oliver Marin County Superior Court Sonoma County Superior Court
CEO Desiré Leard CEO Hugh K. Swift Mariposa County Superior Court Stanislaus County Superior Court
CEO Kim Turner CEO Stephanie M. Hansel Mendocino County Superior Court Sutter County Superior Court
CEO Amanda Toste CEO Kevin Harrigan Merced County Superior Court Tehama County Superior Court
CEO Brandy Malcolm CEO Staci Holliday Modoc County Superior Court Trinity County Superior Court
CEO Lester Perpall CEO Stephanie Cameron Mono County Superior Court Tulare County Superior Court
CEO Chris Ruhl CEO Hector Gonzalez, Jr. Monterey County Superior Court Tuolumne County Superior Court
Page 239¶
COURT REPORTER SHORTAGE CRISIS November 2, 2022
CEO Bob Fleshman CEO Brenda L. McCormick Napa County Superior Court Ventura County Superior Court
CEO Jason B. Galkin CEO Shawn Landry Nevada County Superior Court Yolo County Superior Court
CEO David H. Yamasaki CEO Heather Pugh Orange County Superior Court Yuba County Superior Court
Page 240¶
Standing Order 2.1
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CABF-QRNIA_ -u --. 4
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
In re: release of information for the benefit STANDING ORDER
of minors. (PROBATE)
In most jurisdictions there is a child protective services agency, or similar
agency, which has the authority and obligation to protect minors from neglect and
abuse. Law enforcement agencies also have responsibility for this protection. In
many cases, these agencies will be involved with children who are the subject of
guardianship proceedings pending in this Court's Probate Department. . The
purpose of guardianship proceedings is to protect minors, and that protection is best
served by cooperation with these agencies, including exchange of relevant
information. Accordingly, GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,
THERE IS HEREBY ISSUED A STANDING ORDER that the court's
investigators are authorized to release to law enforcement, child protective services
or similar agencies, upon request or where it appears to the investigators that this
would be in the minor's best interest, any reports and other information in
possession of the court's investigators.
Dated: October 17, 2000
Judge of the Superior Court
Page 241¶
Standing Order 2.2
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
Miscellaneous Filing
' ORDER AND AGREEMENT
. RE PRESERVATION OF
COURT RECORDS
12 Pursuant to the mandate of California Rule of Court 6.755, the Court hereby designates the 13 Contra Costa County Historical Society as the archival facility to preserve and catalogue court 14 records in accordance with subsection (i). The Historical Society agrees ti comply with the storage, 15 access and other applicable requirements of Rule 6.755, and to report to the Court as requested 16 regarding the status of court records at its archival facility. . 17- -
8 Dated: January 10,2005 19 'PHOMAS M. MADDOCK PRESIDING JUDGE Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
21 Thecontra Costa County Historical Society agrees to the terms above and agrees to archive 22 the records listed i.qAttachment A, incorporated herein by this reference. 23 . -
24 Dated: January I?, 2005
On behalf of The ~ o n ! aCosta County Historical Society
Page 242¶
Miscellaneous Filing
ATTACHMENT A TO ORDER AND AGREEMENT RE PRESERVATION OF COURT RECORDS
Pursuant to the mandate of California Rule of Court 6.755, the Court hereby designates
the Contra Costa County Historical Society as the archival facility to preserve and catalogue
9 the following court records in accordance with subsection (I). I I Registers of Actions (Civil & Family Law) vol. 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263. Registers of Actions (Richmond Court - Civil, Family Law, Probate) vol. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16,17, 18, 19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, vol. 1, 2,4, 5. Registers of Actions (Criminal) vol. 3,4,5,6,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30, 31, 32. RegistersofActions(Probate)vol.5,6,7,8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,20,21, 22,23,24,25,26,27,28, 29, 30, 31, 32,33,34, 35, 36, 37, 38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,4 47,48,49,50,51, 52,53,54,55, 56, 57,58, 59,60,61,62, 63,64,65,66,67,68,69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75. Judgment Books (Civil, Family Law) vol. 24,25,26,27,28, 35,36,37,38, 39,40,41,42,43, 44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53, 54,55, 56, 57,58, 59,60,61,62,63, 64, 65, 66, 67,68, 69,70,71,72,73,74, 75, 76,77,78,79, 80,81, 82, 83,84, 85,86,87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92,93, 94,95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109. Judgment Dockets vol. 5, 6,7, 8, 9, 10 (A-M), 10 (N-Z). Decrees of Distribution (Probate) vol. 1, 2, 3,4, 5. Naturalization Records (Petitions, Declarations of Intention, Depositions) (1850 - 1879) - 1 box Naturalization Records (Index Cards, Certificate Stubs) - 3 boxes Probate Vouchers (1950's and 1960's) - 13 boxes
Page 243¶
Miscellaneous Filing .
ATI'ACHMENT A TO ORDER
AND AGREEMENT RE PRESERVATION OF COURT RECORD$
Pursuant to the mandate of California Rule of Court 6.755, the Court hereby
designates the Contm Costa County Historical Society as the archival facility to preserve and
catalogue the following court records in accordance with subsection (i).
Index to Probate Records Volumes 2,3,4 and 5 (1 946 - 1974) General Civil Index Plaintiffs Volume 6 (A-K) (1924 - 1938) Volume 6 (L-Z) (1 924 - 1938) Volume 7 (E-K) (1938 - 1956) Volume 7 (S-Z) (1938 - 1955) General Civil Index Defendants Volume 6 (A-K) (1 924 - 1938) . Volume 6 (L-Z) (1 924 - 1938) Volume 7 (A-D) (1938 - 1956) Volume 7 (S-L) (1938 - 1956) Register of Action - Criminal Volumes 7,8,-9, 10, 11, 12,13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 (1943 - 1968) People vs. Marshall Martin & Elizabeth Eichler - Court documents, tianscri~ts,court reporter notes, sheriffs bills - 1873
Page 244¶
Standing Order 2.3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA DATE: AUGUST 29, 2024 DEPARTMENT 1 JUDGE: HON. EDWARD G. WEIL COURT CLERK: CAROLINE RUARO UNREPORTED STANDING ORDER 2.3 RE: PURGING MISDEMEANOR ARREST AND BENCH WARRANTS This order sets the Court’s uniform policy to establish purge criteria for misdemeanor and infraction warrants. Purge 3 years from warrant | All CVC misdemeanors and infractions except: issue date e CVC 23103a &b e CVC 23152a&b e CVC 23153a &b All other misdemeanors All AMORS cases All city & county ordinance misdemeanor and infractions Purge 10 years from warrant | Child Molestation Violations issue date e PC 647(a) e PC 647(i) Child Abuse e PC 273a(a) e PC 273a(b) Domestic Violence e PC 166(c)(1) e PC 243(e)(1) e PC 273.5(a) e PC 273.6 e PC 314 Elder Abuse e PC 237(b) e PC 368 Sexual Abuse e PC 243.4 e PC 288 (all subsections) e PC 289(c) e PC 289(h) 1
Page 245¶
e PC 290 e PC 647.6 Other e CVC 23103a &b e CVC 23152a &b e CVC 23153a &b The Judges do not wish to distinguish between bench and arrest warrant cases, the reason for the warrant, or the bail amount in question. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 29, 2024 en al CA_-f HON. EDWARD G.WEIL Presiding Judge of the Superior Court Contra Costa County
Page 246¶
Standing Order 2.4 FILED JUN 12 2012 ORDER TO RECALL ALL OUTSTANDING BENCH WARRANTS ISSUED ON UNSIGNED CITATIONS IT IS HERBY ORDERED that all outstanding warrants that have been issued by the Superior Court of California in and for the County of Contra Costa based on the failure to appear of a defendant pursuant to an unsigned citation shall be immediately recalled. Any such citation for violations of the Vehicle Code shall be referred to the District Attorney’s Office for a verified complaint filing decision pursuant to Vehicle Code section 40002. If no complaint is filed, the matter is to be dismissed. No new warrants shall issue for failure to appear on an unsigned citation. Any unsigned citations for Non-Vehicle Code violations are to be returned to the filing law enforcement agency with instructions to submit to the District Attorney’s Office for a filing decision. If no complaint is filed the matter is to be dismissed. of (2[/2— CODE AW Ka Date FH. John Kennedy, Xcting pati ee cc: 1) Diana Becton, Presiding Judge 2) Supervising Judges of Traffic Courts 3) Kiri Tore, CEO
Page 247¶
Pa Order 2.5 P ewes (D SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA | JUL 08 2013 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA IN SESSION AS A JUVENILE COURT IN RE RELEASE OF INFORMATION ) PERTAINING TO MINORS DESCRIBED ) BY ORDER OF THE COURT BY SECTION 601 OR 602 OF THE ) WELFARE AND INSTITUTIONS CODE _) ) TO THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND ALL SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: All school officials in all school districts in Contra Costa County may release to any probation officer of Contra Costa County who is involved in any investigation of, or ongoing supervision of, any juvenile who comes within the jurisdiction of the suvenile Court, may disclose any and all records and reports, any portion of those records and reports, and any information related to the contents of those records or reports when ward of the Court, or to provide ongoing supervision of that minor to monitor his or her compliance with any orders given to that minor by the Juvenile Court. All information which identifies individuals in the documents of the above-mentioned agencies will be held in the strictest confidence and used for the sole purpose of informing investigations or supervision pertaining to wardship. Any use of such information for purposes other than the official disposition of the case will constitute a willful violation of the confidentiality provisions of the Juvenile Court Law. The information disclosed shall be maintained in a secure place to guai zainst any violation of the Dated: July 8, 2013 COURTJUDGE Poesia
Page 248¶
Standing Order 2.6 Superior Court of the State of Californi i 1 = For the County of Contra Costa == Juvenile Court AUS -3 11H. NASH CJ.ERK Of THG COURT TE ee Se crar ‘CALIFORNIA » Deputy Clerk In the event an attorney or other person files a petition to review or copy portions of a Juvenile file under Section 827 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, the Reviewing Judge generally provides a courtesy copy of the released pages to the District Attorney’s Office. When this occurs, the copy to the DA can and will be delivered by inter-office mail. These documents are not notices or filed papers and, therefore, do not require service in accordance with CCP §1013a. The District Attorney’s Office has agreed to this method of delivery and effective immediately, this method will be used by the Court. DATED: July 28, 2015 LoD Wiehbank THOMAS M. MADDOCK Presiding Judge Juvenile Court
Page 249¶
13 14 15 16 17 18 23 24 25 26 27 Standing Order 2.7 ° FI LE APR 10 2019 K. BIEKER CLERK OF THE COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA By. TL. Humiston, Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA In Re: CONFIDENTIALITY OF COURT RECORDS; LOCAL INMATES AND PETITIONS FOR INVOLUNTARY STANDING ORDER - DEPARTMENT 13 PSYCHIATRIC MEDICATION Whereas petitions seeking involuntary medication of detainees pursuant to Penal Code §§ 1370(a)(2)(D)(ii), 2603(c), or 2603(d) and documents filed in support of or in opposition to such petitions contain extremely sensitive and personal information; and Whereas detainees have an overriding privacy interest in information concerning their mental health and that interest overcomes the right of public access to the record. Therefore, to facilitate the filing of petitions seeking involuntary medication and documents supporting or opposing such petitions while ensuring the confidentiality of those petitions and related documents, the Court hereby orders that all petitions and related documents filed pursuant to Penal Code §§ 1370(a)(2)(D)(ii), 2603(c), or 2603(d) may be filed under seal and in an envelope marked “Confidential.” // //
Page 250¶
nN 10 11 12 13 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 The Court further Orders that its records relating to these petitions shall be kept in a confidential file not accessible to the general public. APR 0 8 2019 Dated: Hon. Leis A. Davis Judge of the Superior Court
Page 251¶
Standing Order 2.8
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
Date: December 19, 2023 DEPARTMENT 1 JUDGE: EDWARD G. WEIL COURT CLERK: DIANA GHIRARDO UNREPORTED
STANDING ORDER RE: PC 987 FUNDING ORDERS
The Court authorizes the manager of the Martinez Criminal Clerks office to Open, Scan into Odyssey and Destroy any sealed envelopes containing PC 987 Funding Orders being held in the Martinez Criminal Clerks office. Any such documents shall be coded as "Sealed, "i.e., access shall be limited to Judges and Managers.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: December19,2023 HON. EDWARD G. WEIL Presiding Judge of the Superior Court Contra Costa County
Page 252¶
Standing Order 2.9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA DATE: JUNE 11, 2025 DEPARTMENT 1 JUDGE: HON. CHRISTOPHER R. BOWEN COURT CLERK: CAROLINE RUARO UNREPORTED SECOND AMENDED STANDING ORDER 2.9 ACCESS TO ELECTRONIC COURT RECORDS (CARE COURT AND MENTAL HEALTH) Under California Rule of Court 2.540, the Court may grant remote access to electronic court records to certain named government entities. Subdivision (b)(1)(Q) allows the Court, for good cause, to grant remote electronic access in particular case types to government entities beyond those specifically listed. “Good cause” means that the government entity requires access to the electronic records to adequately perform its legal duties or fulfill its responsibilities in litigation. Beginning December 2, 2024, under the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act, the Court established its CARE Court. The CARE Court process directly involves Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services (“Behavioral Health”), the Office of the Public Defender, and the Office of County Counsel, all government entities, in the provision of CARE Court services. Remote electronic access to records in mental health cases allows each of these parties to adequately perform their duties in these cases. . In addition, the District Attorney's Office, the Office of the Public Defender, and the Probation Department, all governmental entities, are likewise directly involved in the representation of parties or in the administration related to mental health cases before the Court. Remote electronic access to records in mental health cases allows each of these parties to adequately perform their duties in these cases. For this reason, the Court finds that good cause exists for each office to be GRANTED the specified remote access to electronic records below, subject to the conditions of this Order: e Behavioral Health: Once Behavioral Health is ordered by the CARE Court to evaluate an individual for potential CARE Court services, Behavioral Health shall have remote access to electronic records in that individual CARE Court case only. ‘ e Office of the Public Defender: This office shall have access to CARE Court cases and mental health cases. e Office of the District Attorney: This office shall have access to mental health cases.
Page 253¶
• Office of County Counsel: This office shall have access to CARE Court cases. • Probation Department: This office shall have access to CARE Court cases and mental health cases. • Conflicts Program: This office shall have access to mental health cases.
Such access shall be subject to Rule of Court 2.540(c) and any Memorandum of
Understanding or similar document required by the Court Executive Officer to enable access. Where not specifically addressed above, the Court may restrict access only to those attorneys or other representatives of any of the above offices who are directly involved in specific cases, as determined by the Court Executive Officer in consultation with the Presiding Judge.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 11, 2025
HON. CHRISTOPHER R. BOWEN Presiding Judge of the Superior Court Contra Costa County
2
Page 254¶
Standing Order 3.1 — SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA l L E IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTI OCT 01 2019 K. BIEKER CLERK OF THE COURT SUPERIOR COUNT OF, GALIFORNIA OF CONTRA COSTA DATE: September 30, 2019 DEPARTMENT 1 amar oa JUDGE: BARRY BASKIN COURT CLERK: JANE WATERS UNREPORTED STANDING ORDER RE FACSIMILE FILING IN CERTAIN JUVENILE CASES Under Rule 5.522 of the California Rules of Court, a court that accepts facsimile filings has discretion to accept facsimile filing of petitions in juvenile cases under various Welfare and Institutions Code sections, including sections 300, 601 and 602. This Court's local rules permit facsimile filing generally and specifically in juvenile dependency proceedings. (See Local Rules 2.80 et seq.) Accordingly, while a Standing Order is not necessary to address this issue in light of the discretion conferred under the Rules of Court and this Court’s acceptance of facsimile filing, IT IS ORDERED that the Court shall accept facsimile filing of juvenile petitions under Welfare and Institutions Code sections 600 and 601. Such filings shall include Judicial Council Form JV-520 — Fax Filing Cover Sheet (Juvenile). Further, any such petitions filed by facsimile in 2017 or 2018 are deemed filed under the California Rules of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: lofifi4 We v BARRY BASKIN Presiding Judge_of Superior Court Contra Costa County
Page 255¶
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA SEVENTH AMENDED STANDING ORDER RE: E-FILING IN CIVIL CASES CILE P pie D K. BIEKER CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALEOSNA COUNTY OF CONTRA Gost February 11, 2025 By. Deputy Cle Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6(d) and Rules 2.252 and 2.253 of the California Rules of Court, the Court adopted Local Rule 2.87 regarding mandatory electronic filing and service in Designated Cases in January of 2022. Further to that Local Rule, the Court ORDERS as follows:
- Electronic filing in Designated Cases will be mandatory beginning on July 5, 2022, and shall be available optionally beginning on June 20, 2022.
- The following are Designated Cases for electronic filing: a. Limited and Unlimited Civil cases, including Complex matters. b. c. Family Law, including DCSS matters. Probate. Small Claims. Unlawful Detainer. Appeals.
Page 256¶
- The following documents may not be electronically filed and must still be filed/lodged in hard copy form unless otherwise ordered by the Presiding Judge or provided in an amended Local Rule: a. Documents related to Civil Harassment Restraining Orders and Workplace Violence Restraining Orders. Bonds and undertakings. Bench warrants. Petitions for Name Change. Challenges under Code of Civil Procedure §§ 170.1/170.3 and 170.6, except in Domestic Violence Restraining Order cases. In Civil matters: i. Ex Parte Motions and Oppositions, except that the following must be electronically filed:
Ex Parte Application for Order to Serve By Publication. Ex Parte Application and Order to Serve the California Secretary of State. Ex Parte Application and Order to Serve Summons by Posting for Unlawful Detainer. Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time to Serve. Ex Parte Stipulations. it. Subpoenas. iii. Administrative Records. (Administrative records should be submitted on a flash drive, or by hard copy if ordered by the Court.)
Page 257¶
g. In Civil Complex matters: Ex Parte Motions and Oppositions. Subpoenas. Administrative Records. h. In Probate matters: vi. vii. Ex Parte Motions and Oppositions. Affidavit re Real Property of Small Value. Bonds. Estate Planning Documents. Wills and Codicils. Subpoenas. Letters of Administration/Testamentary/Conservatorship/ Guardianship. i. In Family matters: i. i. iii. iv. v. vi. Judgments. Notice of Entry of Judgment. Abstract of Judgment. Ex Partes / Contempts. Opposition to Commissioner. Writs. j. In Small Claims matters: Any document that needs to be issued. Subpoenas.
Page 258¶
ili. Certificate of Facts -DL30. 4. Courtesy copies of electronically-filed documents are not required unless ordered by a judicial officer in a specific matter. 5. All remaining provisions of Local Rule 2.87 continue in effect. IT 1S SO ORDERED. Dated: February 11, 2025 Leb C3 WEN HON. CHRISTOPHER R. BO Presiding Judge of the Superior Court Contra Costa County
Page 259¶
Standing Order 3.3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA DATE: January 20, 2023 DEPARTMENT 1 JUDGE: Hon. Edward G. Weil COURT CLERK: Caroline Ruaro UNREPORTED STANDING ORDER RE: PENDING PETITIONS FOR CONVICTION RELIEF WHERE RELIEF PREVIOUSLY GRANTED PURSUANT TO PENAL CODE §1203.425 Penal Code section 1203.425 requires the California Department of Justice to, in certain circumstances, automatically grant conviction relief/expungement to certain defendants who meet the statutory criteria. In certain cases, individuals who have received such relief may nonetheless have petitioned the Court for the same relief, though such a petition would no longer be necessary. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that, upon confirmation that all charges resulting in conviction that are the subject of a pending motion for conviction relief before this Court have in fact been expunged by the Department of Justice under Penal Code §1203.425:
- The Clerk shall issue written notification to the parties to the pending motion, which shall include the docket number of the case on which expungement was granted, stating: “The California Department of Justice has confirmed that the petitioner in this case has been granted conviction relief pursuant to California Penal Code §1203.425. Accordingly, petitioner need not calendar a motion date with this Court for conviction relief.”
- The Clerk shall enter dismissal of the associated petition seeking conviction relief. Dated: January 20, 2023 LA ( Sa id [A= “HON. EDWARD G. WEIL , Presiding Judge of the Superior Court Contra Costa County
Page 260¶
Standing Order 3.4 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA STANDING ORDER RE: PERMISSIVE E- FILING IN CRIMINAL AND JUVENILE CASES NOVEMBER 16, 2023 Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6(d) and Rules 2.252 and 2.253 of the California Rules of Court, the Court will permit e-filing in Criminal and Juvenile cases, as set forth in this standing order pending amendment to the Local Rules, effective November 27, 2023. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:
- Electronic filing shall be permitted in Criminal and Juvenile cases beginning on November 27, 2023. As Rule 2.252 of the California Rules of Court permits mandatory electronic filing only in Civil cases, nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as mandating electronic filing in either Criminal! or Juvenile Delinquency case types. E-filing is optional in Juvenile Dependency cases.
- The following documents may not be electronically filed and must still be filed/lodged in hard copy form unless otherwise ordered by the Presiding Judge or provided in an amended Local Rule or Standing Order:
Page 261¶
a. In Criminal matters: vi. vii. vill.
- xi, Initial Complaints/Petitions. Parole Revocation Filings. Parole Warrants. Post-Release Community Supervision Warrants. Ramey Warrants. Search Warrants. Waivers of Extradition. Criminal Habeas Corpus Petitions. Orders/Judgments. Challenges under Code of Civil Procedure §§ 170.1/170.3 and 170.6. Ex Parte Motions and Oppositions. b. In Juvenile matters: vi. Initial Complaints/Petitions. Reports and Recommendations. Orders/Judgments. Warrants. Challenges under Code of Civil Procedure §§ 170.1/170.3 and 170.6. Ex Parte Motions and Oppositions.
Page 262¶
- Courtesy copies of electronically-filed documents are not required unless ordered by a judicial officer in a specific matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 16, 2023 LL CH A HON. EDWARD G. WEIL Presiding Judge of the Superior Court Contra Costa County
Page 263¶
Standing Order 4.1 fe | TLE MAY 15 2085 ° : NEN H. NASH CLERKWOF THE COURT RIOR POURAOF THESTATE, OF CALIFORNIA {3 f 16, Superior Court of California County of Contra Costa A s Deputy Clerk 10 Bel 12 13 14 15 16 Ly 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 K. Cardinale Dangerous, Toxic, Bio-Hazardous Material _ ) Order re Return of Dangerous, Toxic, Bio- ) Hazardous Material/Exhibits It is hereby ORDERED THAT: The Court will not store dangerous, toxic or bio-hazardous materials as exhibits in any case, including but not limited to drugs, paraphernalia, paint, bodily fluids, urine and weapons. The party intending to introduce any of these above referenced materials shall bring photographs of the materials on the date they intend to introduce the materials in court. This photograph will be marked and substituted for the materials when the court finds good cause to do so. Pursuant to Penal Code 1417.3, at any time prior to the final determination of the action or proceeding, exhibits offered by the state or defendant shall be returned to the party offering them by order of the court when an exhibit poses a security, storage or safety problem, as recommended by the clerk of the court. Upon court order, the clerk shall substitute a full and — photographic record of any exhibit or part of any exhibit returned under this section. The submitting party shall produce said photographs. Exhibits toxic by nature that pose a health hazard to humans shall be introduced to the court in the form of a photographic records and written chemical analysis certified by a competent authority. Where the court finds that good cause exists to depart from this procedure, toxic exhibits may be brought into the courtroom and introduced. However, following introduction of the exhibit, the person or persons previously in possession of the exhibit shall take responsibility for it and the court shall not store the SKB Honorable Stéen K. Alistin, Presiding Judge exhibit. Dangerous, Toxic, Bio-Hazardous Material
Page 264¶
an FB WwW NHN o Oo NN BD 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Standing Order 4 ILE SHARON L. ANDERSON (SBN 94814) c Canny Comsd SEP 14 2015 STEVEN P. RETTIG (SBN 178477) Assistant County Counsel SURERIPHCDUAY er CERO OE THE COURT COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA Uuiveiveaes P.O. Box 69, Co. Admin. Bldg. \ Rae Devi ca Martinez, CA 94553-0116 Tel: (925) 335-1830 Fax (925) 646-2461 Attorney for Petitioner, Children & Family Services Bureau SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA HO In re the matter of: ) STANDING ORDERVAUTHORIZING ) CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES ) BUREAU TO REGULARLY ) PHOTOGRAPH DEPENDENT ) CHILDREN FOR IDENTIFICATION ) AND DOCUMENTATION PURPOSES persons coming under the Juvenile ) Court law. ) ) The Court finds that Contra Costa County Children & Family Services manages approximately 1100 open Dependency cases annually. Given the volume of cases and the number of workers involved, as well as the regular transfer of cases that occurs between different units and the rate of turnover among workers, there is a need for a court order to authorize Children and Family Services to regularly photograph children in protective custody and/or Dependents in order to be able to accurately identify the children when providing the children and their families with needed services. Photwempbie documentation of Dependent children and youth provides added assurance that despite file transfers and case worker turnover, the appropriate children and youth are served by Children & Family Services. The Court also finds that having photographs of dependent children will aid in facilitating the recovery of missing or AWOL children. /i/
Page 265¶
oO ont Dn nA FSF W WN 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Based upon these findings, the Court hereby makes the following Standing Order: Contra Costa County Children & Family Services/Employment and Human Services Department is hereby authorized to: Photograph children in protective custody and/or Dependent children who have been placed outside the home at regular intervals and maintain such photographs in the child’s file in an effort to accurately document and record the child’s identity for the purpose of providing services to the child and his/her family. Any photographs of Dependent children taken by Contra Costa County Children & Family Services pursuant to this Standing Order shall be maintained in the child’s file and remain a confidential record pursuant to the provisions of California Welfare and Institutions Code 827 et. seq. This Order shall be a Standing Order of this Court effective immediately, and shall remain in effect unless superseded or rescinded by a subsequent order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: Sepl. 14, 20s TF. THOMAS M. MADDOCK Supervising Juvenile Court Judge