CAEB — Technical Amendment to Local Bankruptcy Rule 1001-1(g)

Source: https://www.caeb.uscourts.gov//documents/forms/generalorders/GO.01-04.pdf

Sparse pages use OCR; original PDF remains authoritative.

FILED UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COUR] EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA | univep STaTES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA | In re: TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO LOCAL ) GENERAL ORDER 01-04 BANKRUPTCY RULE 1001-1(g) ) ) Local Bankruptcy Rule 1001-1(g), Scope of Rules; Short Title, (Sanctions for Noncompliance with Rules), is hereby amended to read as follows: (g) Sanctions for Noncompliance with Rules. Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules, with the FRCivP or the FRBP, or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court, including, without limitation, dismissal of any action, entry of default, finding of contempt, imposition of monetary sanctions or attorney's fees and costs, and other lesser sanctions. This amendment is determined to be of a non-substantive, technical nature and therefore not subject to the notice and opportunity for comment requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 83, as made applicable by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9029. IT IS SO ORDERED DATED: December 14, 2001 Michael S. McManus, Chief Judge Christopher|M. Klein, Judge Jane Dickson McKeag, Judge Whitney Rimel, Suda LEME. Thomas C. Holman, Judge W. Richard Lee, Judge