Solano — Effective July 1, 2017

Source: https://solano.courts.ca.gov/system/files/solano-county-local-rules-effective-2017-07-01-complete.pdf

Sparse pages use OCR; original PDF remains authoritative.

SUPERIOR COURT

OF

CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SOLANO

LOCAL COURT RULES

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Hall of Justice Law & Justice Center Old Solano Courthouse Solano Justice Center 600 Union Avenue 530 Union Avenue 580 Texas Street 321 Tuolumne Street Fairfield, CA 94533 Fairfield, CA 94533 Fairfield, CA 94533 Vallejo, CA 94590 (707) 207-7300 (707) 207-7300 (707) 207-7300 (707) 561-7800

Local Rules of Court Adopted July 1, 1988

Revised January 1, 1991 Revised July 1, 2010

Revised July 1, 1991 Revised January 1, 2011

Revised July 1, 1992 Revised July 1, 2011

Revised October 1, 1996 Revised January 1, 2012

Revised January 1, 1998 Revised July 1, 2012

Revised August 1, 2002 Revised January 1, 2013

Revised October 1, 2002 Revised July 1, 2013

Revised July 1, 2005 Revised July 1, 2014

Revised January 1, 2007 Revised January 1, 2015

Corrected April 2, 2007 Revised July 1, 2015

Revised January 1, 2008 Revised January 1, 2016

Revised July 1, 2008 Revised July 1, 2016

Revised January 1, 2009 Revised January 1, 2017

Revised July 1, 2009 Revised July 1, 2017

Revised January 1, 2010

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Brian Taylor, Court Executive Officer, is the official publisher of the local rules for the Superior Court of California County of Solano. Comments or suggestions concerning the local rules may be sent to the court at CourtOutreach@solano.courts.ca.gov.

The complete local rules, as well as individual rules and filing instructions for replacement pages, and local forms are available in .pdf format at the court’s website, www.solano.courts.ca.gov, by clicking on the hyperlink marked “Local Rules of Court.”

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Local Rules of Court

Summary Table of Contents

Rule 2 Criminal and Traffic Infraction Cases

Rule 4 Administration of Civil Litigation

Rule 8 Claims of Adults with Disabilities or Minors

Rule 9 Attorneys’ Fees in Default Matters, Promissory Notes, Contracts, and Foreclosures

Rule 10 Administration

Rule 11 Jury Management (Reserved)

Rule 12 Mental Health Conservatorships (LPS) (Reserved)

Rule 15 Guardianships and Conservatorships

Rule 17 Miscellaneous

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano Local Rules – Detailed Table of Contents

Number Rule Page

RULE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 1.1 Adoption of Local Rules (Amended eff. 1/1/10) .................................................................. 1-1 Rule 1.2 Divisions Of The Court; Assignment of Supervising Judges (Amended eff. 7/1/14) ........... 1-1 Rule 1.3 Direct Calendaring (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ........................................................................... 1-1 Rule 1.4 Reassignment Upon Disqualification of Judicial Officer or for Other Cause (Amended eff. 1/1/12) ........................................................................................................................... 1-2

RULE 2 CRIMINAL AND TRAFFIC INFRACTION CASES PART ONE: Rules Applicable to Misdemeanors and Felonies Rule 2.1 Application Of Rules (Amended eff. 1/1/13) ....................................................................... 2-1 Rule 2.2 Direct Calendaring Of Criminal Cases (Amended eff. 1/1/13) ............................................. 2-1 Rule 2.3 Procedure (Amended eff. 7/1/14) ........................................................................................ 2-1 Rule 2.4* Peremptory Challenge Of Judge Assigned For All Purposes [REPEALED] (Repealed eff. 1/1/13) ................................................................................................................................. 2-2 PART TWO: Felony Criminal Cases Rules 2.50 – 2.99 [RESERVED] ........................................................................................................................ 2-3 PART THREE: Misdemeanor Cases Rules 2.100 – 2.149 [RESERVED] ........................................................................................................................ 2-4 PART FOUR: Traffic Infraction Cases Rules 2.150 – 2.199 [RESERVED] ........................................................................................................................ 2-5

RULE 3 CIVIL CASES Rule 3.1 Application Of Rules (Amended eff. 7/1/11) ....................................................................... 3-1 Rule 3.2 Direct Calendaring Of Civil Cases; Assignments and Reassignments (Amended eff. 1/1/12) ................................................................................................................................. 3-1 Rule 3.3 Notification Of Plaintiff Of Assignment To One Judge For All Purposes (Amended eff. 7/1/10) ................................................................................................................................. 3-2 Rule 3.4* Designation Of Court [REPEALED] (Repealed eff. 7/1/11). .................................................. 3-2

Rule 3.5 Calendaring of Hearings (Eff. 7/1/11).................................................................................. 3-2 Rule 3.6 Deposit Of Jury Fees (Amended eff. 7/1/13) ........................................................................ 3-2 Rule 3.7 Forfeiture Of Jury Fees per CCP Section 631.3 (Amended eff. 7/1/13) ............................... 3-3 Rule 3.8 Notification to Court of Drops, Continuances and Stipulations (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ...... 3-3 Rule 3.9 Tentative Rulings (Amended eff. 7/1/17) ............................................................................. 3-4 Rule 3.10 Telephonic Appearances (Amended eff. 7/1/17) .................................................................. 3-5

• Denotes a rule that has been renumbered or repealed.

  Table of Contents - 1

  www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano Local Rules – Detailed Table of Contents

Number Rule Page

Rule 3.11 Failure To Notify Court When Attorney Cannot Be Present Shall Be Deemed Sufficient Cause To Order Off Calendar (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ......................................................... 3-5 Rule 3.12 Off Calendar (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ..................................................................................... 3-6 Rule 3.13 Ex Parte Matters (Amended eff. 7/1/13) ............................................................................... 3-6 Rule 3.14* Orders Regarding Orders To Show Cause, Temporary Restraining Orders, And Injunctions [REPEALED] (Repealed eff. 7/1/10) ................................................................... 3-6 Rule 3.15 Motions To Consolidate (Amended eff. 7/1/10) ................................................................... 3-7 Rule 3.16 Motions Papers (Amended eff. 7/1/10) ................................................................................ 3-7

Rule 3.17 Mandate Actions Arising Under The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Amended eff. 7/1/10) .......................................................................................................... 3-7 Rule 3.18 Filing Of Notices Of Unavailability (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ................................................. 3-12

RULE 4 ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL LITIGATION Rule 4.1 Scope And Policy (Amended eff. 7/1/11) ............................................................................. 4-1 Rule 4.2 Case Designation (Amended eff. 1/1/10).............................................................................. 4-2 Rule 4.3 Time Requirements For Complaint (Amended eff. 7/1/11) .................................................. 4-3 Rule 4.4 Time Requirements For Responsive Pleadings (Amended eff. 7/1/11) ................................ 4-3 Rule 4.5 Time Requirements For Cross-Complaints (Amended eff. 7/1/11) ...................................... 4-3 Rule 4.6 Case Management Conferences (Amended eff. 7/1/) ........................................................... 4-3 Rule 4.7 Diversion To Arbitration (Amended eff. 1/1/12) .................................................................. 4-7 Rule 4.8 Mediation (Amended eff. 1/1/12) ......................................................................................... 4-8 Rule 4.9 Mandatory Settlement Conferences (Amended eff. 7/1/11) ................................................. 4-12 Rule 4.10 Trial Management Conferences (Amended eff. 1/1/12) ....................................................... 4-14 Rule 4.11 Dismissal Of Action Or Entry Of Judgment Following Settlement (Amended eff. 7/1/11) . 4-16 Rule 4.12 Miscellaneous (Amended eff. 7/1/17)................................................................................... 4-16 Rule 4.13 Sanctions (Amended eff. 1/1/10) .......................................................................................... 4-18

Rule 4.14 Electronic Filing and Service of Pleadings and Documents (Eff. 7/1/10) ........................... 4-19 APPENDIX 2015-001-CV Electronic Service of Documents in Complex Litigation .................................................... 4-21

RULE 5 FAMILY LAW PART ONE: Family Law Proceedings Generally

Rule 5.1 Matters Assigned to the Family Law Division; Applicability of Rule (Eff. 7/1/14) ............ 5-1

Rule 5.2 Direct Calendaring (Eff. 1/1/13) .......................................................................................... 5-2

Rule 5.3 Preparation and Filing of Forms and Pleadings (Eff. 1/1/13) .............................................. 5-2

• Denotes a rule that has been renumbered or repealed.

  Table of Contents - 2

  www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano Local Rules – Detailed Table of Contents

Number Rule Page

Rule 5.4 Applications for Emergency Orders (Ex Parte Orders) (Amended eff. 1/1/17) .................... 5-4

Rule 5.5 Law and Motion Hearings (Hearings Other Than Case Management Conferences, Status Conferences, Settlement Conferences, and Trials) (Amended eff. 7/1/17)........................... 5-5

Rule 5.6 Presence of Children in Courtroom (Eff. 1/1/13) ................................................................. 5-8

Rule 5.7 Family Centered Case Resolution Process (CRC 5.83) (Eff. 1/1/13) .................................. 5-8

Rule 5.8 Status Conferences and Status Conference Reports (Eff. 1/1/13) ........................................ 5-9

Rule 5.9 Court Reporter Fees (Eff. 1/1/13) ........................................................................................ 5-11 PART TWO: Settlement Conferences and Trials

Rule 5.10 Settlement Conferences (Eff. 1/1/13) ................................................................................... 5-12

Rule 5.11 Evidentiary Hearings and Trials (Eff. 1/1/13) ...................................................................... 5-16 Rule 5.12 – 5.19 [RESERVED] ......................................................................................................................... 5-17 PART THREE: Child Custody and Visitation

Rule 5.20 Child Custody Recommending Counseling (Eff. 1/1/13) .................................................... 5-18

Rule 5.21 Child Custody and Visitation Evaluations (Eff. 1/1/13) ...................................................... 5-20 Rule 5.22 – 5.29 [RESERVED] ......................................................................................................................... 5-22 PART FOUR: Support, Property Division, Attorney Fees, Costs, and Sanctions

Rule 5.30 Calculation of Temporary Spousal or Partner Support (Eff. 1/1/13) ................................... 5-23 Rule 5.31 – 5.39 [RESERVED] ......................................................................................................................... 5-23 PART FIVE: Judgments

Rule 5.40 Calendaring Hearings for Default or Uncontested Judgments (Eff. 1/1/13) ........................ 5-24

Rule 5.41 Documents Needed for Judgments for Legal Separation or Dissolution of Marriage or Registered Domestic Partnership (Eff. 1/1/13) .................................................................... 5-24

Rule 5.42 Documents Needed for Judgment of Nullity (Eff. 1/1/13) .................................................. 5-24

Rule 5.43 Documents Needed for Default or Uncontested Judgments for Establishment of Parental Relationship (UPA) or for Establishment of Custody and Support (Eff. 1/1/13) ................. 5-25 APPENDIX 5-A Documents Needed for Judgment of Nullity ....................................................................... 5-26 5-B Documents Needed for Default or Uncontested Judgments for Establishment of Parental Relationship (UPA) or for Establishment of Custody and Support per Family Code §3120 ................................................................................................................................... 5-31 2015-001-FL Standing Order Incorporating Solano County DCSS Additional Orders Into All Solano County DCSS Judgments And Orders ................................................................................. 5-35

Table of Contents - 3

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano Local Rules – Detailed Table of Contents

Number Rule Page

RULE 6 RULES APPLICABLE TO JUVENILE PROCEEDINGS PART ONE: Rules for Juvenile Court in General Rule 6.1 Adoption, Construction, And Amendment Of Rules and Standing Orders (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ................................................................................................................................. 6-1

Rule 6.2 Juvenile Calendar (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ............................................................................. 6-1 Rule 6.3 Access To Courtroom By Non-Parties (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ............................................. 6-2 Rule 6.4 Confidentiality (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ................................................................................. 6-2 Rule 6.5 Release Of Information Relating To Juveniles (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ................................ 6-2 Rule 6.6 Discovery (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ......................................................................................... 6-3 Rule 6.7 Petitions, Pleadings & Motions (Amended eff.1/1/10) ......................................................... 6-4 Rule 6.8 Request For Transcripts by Non-Party (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ............................................. 6-5 Rule 6.9 Welfare And Institutions Code Section 241.1 Assessments (Amended eff. 1/1/10)............. 6-5

Rule 6.10 Motion To Challenge Legal Sufficiency Of Petition (Eff. 1/1/10)....................................... 6-5 Rules 6.11 through 6.29 [RESERVED] ........................................................................................................................ 6-7 PART TWO: Juvenile Dependency Rule 6.30 Appointed Counsel in Dependency Proceedings (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ............................. 6-8 Rule 6.31 Appointment of Private Counsel in Dependency Proceedings (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ......... 6-9

Rule 6.32 Procedures For Reviewing And Resolving Complaints Regarding Representation In Dependency Proceedings (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ................................................................. 6-9

Rule 6.33 Procedures For Informing The Court Of The Interests Of A Dependent Child [CRC 5.660] (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ............................................................................................... 6-11 Rule 6.34 Motion to Challenge Legal Sufficiency of Petition (Amended eff. 1/1/10) .......................... 6-12 Rule 6.35 Access To Minors (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ............................................................................ 6-13 Rule 6.36 Modifications of Orders (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ................................................................... 6-14 Rule 6.37 Court Appointed Special Advocate Program (CASA) (Amended eff. 1/1/10) .................... 6-15 Rules 6.38 through 6.59 [RESERVED] ........................................................................................................................ 6-15 PART THREE: Juvenile Delinquency Rule 6.60 Return On Bench Warrant (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ................................................................ 6-16 APPENDIX 2002-01 Medical Authorization – Juvenile Hall ................................................................................ 6-19 2002-05 Release of Records, Absent Parents .................................................................................... 6-22 2002-07 Release of Records – Financial Hearing Officer ................................................................. 6-23 2011-001 Standing Order Authorizing Mental Health Evaluation and/or Treatment for Dependent Children or Minors Placed into Protective Custody by Child Welfare Services ................. 6-25

Table of Contents - 4

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano Local Rules – Detailed Table of Contents

Number Rule Page

2011-002 Order re: Release of Probation Files and Information Regarding Parents with Children Under the Jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court ....................................................................... 6-27 2011-003 Standing Order to Facilitate Child Welfare Services Disaster Response Plan .................... 6-30 2011-004 The Exchange of Information Pertaining to Juveniles Among Members of Multidisciplinary Team ....................................................................................................... 6-32 2011-005 Exchange and Release of Information Between Child Welfare Services and the Solano County Court Investigator ................................................................................................... 6-34 2011-006 Exchange & Release of Juvenile Records to be Used in the Solano Countywide Foster Youth Services Program (Education Code § 488850 et seq., Welfare & Institutions Code § 827, Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.552) ................................................................................ 6-37 2011-007 Release of School Records to Solano County Probation and Solano County Health and Social Services, Child Welfare Services Division (Education Code § 49077) .................... 6-41 2011-008 Toxicology Testing for Drug Exposed Children Subject to Juvenile Laws (Welfare & Institutions Code § 369, subd. (d)) ..................................................................................... 6-42 2012-001 Standing Order Authorizing Medical Evaluation and Treatment for Minors Placed into Protective Custody and Temporarily Detained in Out-of-Placement By Child Welfare Services ............................................................................................................................... 6-44 2016-001-JV Standing Order re: Release of Juvenile Case File Information for W&I 601 and 602 Proceedings ......................................................................................................................... 6-48 2016-002-JV Designation of Chief Probation Officer/Designee as Representative of Court for Purposes of Referring Students to the Community School Programs ................................................. 6-57

RULE 7 PROBATE PART ONE: Probate Proceedings Generally Rule 7.1 Scope of Probate Rules; Direct Calendarings (Amended eff. 1/1/12) .................................. 7-1 Rule 7.2 Use of Judicial Council Forms; Format of Pleadings; Calendaring (Amended eff. 1/1/12) . 7-1 Rule 7.3 Signatures and Verification of Pleadings (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ......................................... 7-2 Rule 7.4 Bonding of Personal Representative (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ................................................ 7-3 Rule 7.5 Declination of Nominated Executor (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ................................................. 7-3 Rule 7.6 Notices (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ............................................................................................. 7-3 Rule 7.7 Continuances (Amended eff. 1/1/13) .................................................................................... 7-4 Rule 7.8 Pregrants in Probate Matters (Amended eff. 1/1/16) ............................................................ 7-5 Rule 7.9 Appearances at Hearings (Amended eff. 1/1/10) .................................................................. 7-5 Rule 7.10 Ex Parte Applications (Amended eff. 7/1/13) ....................................................................... 7-6 PART TWO: Probate Proceedings Other Than Trusts Rule 7.11 Appointment of Special Administrator (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ............................................ 7-8

Rule 7.12 Information to Be Contained in Petitions for Probate of Will and for Letters Testamentary; For Letters of Administration; or For Letters of Administration with Will Annexed (Probate Code Section 8000 et Seq.) (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ................................ 7-8 Rule 7.13 Preparation of Orders (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ....................................................................... 7-9

Table of Contents - 5

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano Local Rules – Detailed Table of Contents

Number Rule Page

Rule 7.14 Interest on Funeral and Interment Claims (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ........................................ 7-10 Rule 7.15 Real Estate in Inventory and Appraisal (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ............................................ 7-10 Rule 7.16 Cash Deposit (Amended eff. 7/1/09) .................................................................................... 7-10 Rule 7.17 Second Deeds of Trust (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ..................................................................... 7-11 Rule 7.18 Earnest Money Deposit by Overbidder (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ........................................... 7-11 Rule 7.19 Appearances of Counsel (Amended eff. 7/1/09) .................................................................. 7-11 Rule 7.20 Conditional Sales of Real Property (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ................................................. 7-11 Rule 7.21 Broker’s Commissioners (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ................................................................ 7-12 Rule 7.22 Statutory Compensation for Personal Representative and Attorney Fees (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ................................................................................................................................ 7-12 Rule 7.23 Partial Allowance of Statutory Compensation or Attorney Fees (Amended eff. 7/1/09) 7-13

Rule 7.24 Apportionment of Statutory Compensation Between Two or More Personal Representatives (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ............................................................................... 7-14

Rule 7.25 Extraordinary Compensation for Personal Representative; Extraordinary Attorney Fees (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ......................................................................................................... 7-14 Rule 7.26 Distributive Contingencies (Amended eff. 7/1/09) .............................................................. 7-15 Rule 7.27 Contents of Decree of Partial or Final Distribution (Amended eff. 1/1/13) ........................ 7-15 Rule 7.28 Distributions to Trusts (Amended eff. 1/1/10) .................................................................... 7-17 Rule 7.29 Joint Tenancy Assets (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ....................................................................... 7-17

Rule 7.30 Personal Representative Compensation and Attorney Fees in Connection With Termination of a Joint Tenancy or Handling of Other Nonprobate Assets (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ................................................................................................................................ 7-18 Rule 7.31 Court Investigator Fees for Investigation of Petition for Particular Transaction (Amended eff. 7/1/09) .......................................................................................................................... 7-18

Rule 7.32 Receipt or Waiver of Acc ount Signed by Attorney in Fact (Eff. 7/1/10) ............................ 7-18

Rule 7.33 Reimbursement of Expenses of Estate Administration (Eff. 1/1/13) ................................. 7-19 Rule 7.34 through 7.49 [RESERVED ] ........................................................................................................................ 7-19 PART THREE: Trusts

Rule 7.50 Beneficiaries of Testamentary Trust to be Listed in Petition for Letters Testamentary 7-20 (Amended eff. 7/1/09) ......................................................................................................... Rule 7.51 Trustee Fees (Amended eff. 1/1/12) .................................................................................... 7-20

Rule 7.52 Information to be Included in Petitions Concerning Trusts (Eff. 7/1/09) ........................... 7-21 Rule 7.53 General Procedures for Special Needs Trusts (Amended eff. 1/1/12) ................................. 7-21

Rule 7.54 Accountings and Reports of Special Needs Trusts (Eff. 7/1/09) ......................................... 7-22 Rule 7.55 Compensation of Conservator from Trust (Amended eff. 1/1/12) ....................................... 7-23

Rule 7.56 Trust Accountings Filed with the Court (Eff. 7/1/10) ......................................................... 7-23

Table of Contents - 6

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano Local Rules – Detailed Table of Contents

Number Rule Page

RULE 8 COMPROMISES OF CLAIMS 0HRule 8.1 Contents of Petition for Compromise Of Claim Of a Person with a Disability or a Minor (Amended eff. 7/1/14) ......................................................................................................... 8-1 1HRule 8.2 Filing Petitions for Compromise of Claims (Eff. 7/1/14).................................................... 8-1 Rule 8.3 Establishment of Special Needs Trusts (Amended eff. 7/1/14) ........................................... 8-1

RULE 9 ATTORNEY FEES IN DEFAULT MATTERS, PROMISSORY NOTES, CONTRACTS, AND FORECLOSURES Rule 9.1 Attorney Fees - Unlimited Civil Matters (Amended eff.1/1/12) .......................................... 9-1 Rule 9.2 Attorney Fees - Limited Civil Matters (Amended eff. 1/1/12) ........................................... 9-2 Rule 9.3 Open Book Accounts - Unlimited And Limited Civil (Amended eff. 7/1/16)..................... 9-3 APPENDIX 9-A Example of Attorney Fee Calculation per Rule 9.1 ............................................................ 9-4

RULE 10 ADMINISTRATION Rule 10.1 Executive Officer (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ............................................................................ 10-1 Rule 10.2 Reservation Of Government Code 71620 Powers (Amended eff. 1/1/10)........................... 10-1

RULE 11 JURY MANAGEMENT Rule 11.1 through 11.99 [RESERVED] ........................................................................................................................ 11-1

RULE 12 MENTAL HEALTH CONSERVATORSHIPS (LPS) Rule 12.1 through 12.99 [RESERVED] ........................................................................................................................ 12-1

RULE 13 APPEALS

Rule 13.1 Fee Waiver Applications for Matters Being Appealed to the Court of Appeal (Eff. 1/1/10) ................................................................................................................................ 13-1

RULE 14 UNLAWFUL DETAINER Rule 14.1 Telephonic Appearances (Amended eff. 1/1/10) ................................................................. 14-1

Rule 14.2 Trial Management (Eff. 1/1/10) ......................................................................................... 14-1 Rule 14.3 Attorney Fees in Default Matters (Amended eff. 1/1/12) .................................................... 14-1

Table of Contents - 7

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano Local Rules – Detailed Table of Contents

Number Rule Page

RULE 15 GUARDIANSHIPS AND CONSERVATORSHIPS PART ONE: Guardianships Rule 15.1 Applicability of Guardianship Rules; Terminology; Direct Calendaring (Amended eff. 1/1/13) ................................................................................................................................ 15-1 Rule 15.2 Forms to be Filed at Commencement of Proceeding (Amended eff. 1/1/13) ...................... 15-1 Rule 15.3 Notice (Amended eff. 1/1/13) .............................................................................................. 15-4 Rule 15.4 Appointment of Investigator (Amended eff. 7/1/13) ........................................................... 15-5 Rule 15.5 Court Investigator Fees (Amended eff. 1/1/13) ................................................................... 15-8 Rule 15.6 Temporary Guardianships (Amended eff. 1/1/16) ............................................................... 15-9 Rule 15.7* Ex Parte Applications for Temporary Guardianship or Other Temporary Orders [REPEALED] (Repealed eff. 1/1/13) ..................................................................................... 15-10 Rule 15.8 Contested Guardianships (Amended eff. 1/1/13) ................................................................. 15-10 Rule 15.9 Orders for Visitation in Guardianships (Amended eff. 1/1/13) ........................................... 15-11 Rule 15.10 Guardianships of the Estate (Amended eff. 1/1/13) ............................................................. 15-12

Rule 15.11 Guardianships of the Person (Eff. 1/1/13) ........................................................................... 15-13 Rule 15.12* Allowance of Fees in Guardianship Proceedings [REPEALED] (Repealed eff. 1/1/13) ....... 15-14 Rule 15.13* Investments by Guardian of the Estate [REPEALED] (Repealed eff. 1/1/13) ....................... 15-14

Rule 15.14 Appointment of Counsel for Ward (Eff. 7/1/09) ................................................................. 15-14 Rule 15.15 Termination of Guardianship (Amended eff. 1/1/13) .......................................................... 15-15

Rule 15.16 Sanctions (Eff. 7/1/09) ........................................................................................................ 15-16 Rule 15.17* Guardianships of the Person – Status Report [REPEALED] (Repealed eff. 1/1/13) ............. 15-16 Rule 15.18 – 15.49 [RESERVED] ........................................................................................................................ 15-16 PART TWO: Conservatorships

Rule 15.50 Conservatorship Matters to Which Rule 15 Applies (Eff. 7/1/09) ...................................... 15-17

Rule 15.51 Continuance of Hearing Where Conservatee Not Served with Citation (Eff. 7/1/09) ........ 15-17

Rule 15.52 Additional Requirements for Proposed Conservators Prior to Issuance of Letters (Amended eff. 7/1/11) ......................................................................................................... 15-17 Rule 15.53 Court Investigator (Amended eff. 7/1/16) ........................................................................... 15-18

Rule 15.54 Court Investigator Fees (Eff. 7/1/09) .................................................................................. 15-20

Rule 15.55 Appointment of Counsel for Conservatee (Eff. 7/1/09) ...................................................... 15-21

Rule 15.56 Ex Parte Applications for Temporary Conservatorships and Other Orders (Eff. 7/1/09) ... 15-22

Rule 15.57 Independent Exercise of Powers (Eff. 7/1/09) .................................................................... 15-24

Rule 15.58 Conservatorship Inventories and Appraisals (Eff. 7/1/09) .................................................. 15-24 Rule 15.59 Conservatorship Accountings (Amended eff. 1/1/12) ......................................................... 15-25 Rule 15.60 Allowance of Fees (Amended eff. 1/1/12) ........................................................................... 15-27

• Denotes a rule that has been renumbered or repealed.

  Table of Contents - 8

  www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano Local Rules – Detailed Table of Contents

Number Rule Page

Rule 15.61 Orders for Support and Substituted Judgment (Eff. 7/1/09)................................................ 15-28

Rule 15.62 Payments to Caregiver Spouse of Conservatee (Eff. 7/1/09) .............................................. 15-28

Rule 15.63 Termination of Conservatorship (Eff. 7/1/09) ..................................................................... 15-29

Rule 15.64 Conservatorships for Developmentally Disabled Individuals (Eff. 7/1/09) ........................ 15-30

Rule 15.65 Sanctions (Eff. 7/1/09) ........................................................................................................ 15-30

Rule 15.66 Additional Provisions for Conservatorships of the Person (Eff. 1/1/12) ............................ 15-30 Rule 15.67 – 15.99 [RESERVED ] ........................................................................................................................ 15 -30

PART THREE: Miscellaneous

15.100 Complaints Concerning Court Investigators (Eff. 1/1/12) ................................................. 15-31

APPENDIX

15-A List of Service Addresses for Guardianships (Amended eff. 1/1/13) .................................. 15-32

RULE 16 PROTECTIVE ORDERS 16.1 Domestic Violence (Family Code § 6200 et seq.) (Eff. 1/1/12) .......................................... 16-1 16.2 Civil Harassment (CCP § 527.6) ( Eff. 1/1/12 ) .................................................................... 16-2 16.3 Workplace Violence (CCP § 527.8) (Eff. 1/1/12) .............................................................. 16-3 16.4 Postsecondary School Violence (CCP § 527.85) (Eff. 1/1/12) ........................................... 16-4 16.5 Elder or Dependent Adult Abuse [RESERVED ] ( Eff. 1/1/12) ............................................... 16-4

RULE 17 MISCELLANEOUS 17.1 Photography, Videotaping, and Electronic Recordings (Eff. 1/1/12) ................................. 17-1 17.2 Court Reporter Transcripts (Amended eff. 1/1/17) ............................................................. 17-2

APPENDIX

M-1-2016 Weapons in the Courthouse (Eff. 7/1/16) ............................................................................ 17-5

SUBJECT MATTER INDEX

INDEX OF LOCAL FORMS – BY FORM NUMBER

INDEX OF LOCAL FORMS – ALPHABETICAL

Table of Contents - 9

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 1 – General Provisions

1.1 ADOPTION OF LOCAL RULES

The Superior Court of California, County of Solano hereby adopts these local rules pursuant to California Government Code section 68070 and Code of Civil Procedure sections 575.1 and 575.2. Unless otherwise stated in an individual rule, the term “court” as used in these local rules shall mean the Superior Court of California, County of Solano.

(Rule 1.1 amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective January 1, 1998.)

1.2 DIVISIONS OF THE COURT; ASSIGNMENT OF SUPERVISING JUDGES

The court shall be divided into five judicial divisions: the Criminal Division, the Civil Division, the Family Division, the Juvenile Division, and the Appellate Division. The court’s Presiding Judge shall appoint the presiding judge of the Juvenile Division and the supervising judges of all other divisions.

(Rule 1.2 amended effective July 1, 2014; adopted effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective January 1, 2010.)

1.3 DIRECT CALENDARING

All matters pending in the court on January 1, 1998, or filed after January 1, 1998, shall be directly calendared to be heard by one judge for all purposes. If the name of the judge is announced in open court, this announcement shall be deemed adequate and appropriate notice to the parties and attorneys present of the assignment for all purposes.

(Rule 1.3 adopted as Rule 1.4 effective January 1, 1998; amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010.)

1-1

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 1 – General Provisions

1.4 REASSIGNMENT UPON DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICER OR FOR OTHER CAUSE

When a judicial officer is disqualified, either on a peremptory challenge, for cause, or by the judicial officer’s own determination, the matter shall be referred to the presiding judge for reassignment. The reassignment shall be made by the presiding judge or designee, or the supervising or presiding judge of the division, upon the delegation of that authority by the presiding judge, and shall be for all purposes. A matter reassigned to a judicial officer for any other reason shall likewise be for all purposes, unless otherwise ordered by the Presiding Judge or by the Supervising Judge of the division.

(Rule 1.4 amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted as Rule 1.6 effective January 1, 1998; amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010.)

1-2

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 2 – Criminal and Traffic Infraction Cases

PART ONE: Rules Applicable to Misdemeanors and Felonies

2.1 APPLICATION OF RULES

The rules in Part One of Rule 2 apply to all felony and misdemeanor criminal cases pending on, or filed on or after, January 1, 1998.

(Rule 2.1 amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective January 1, 2010.)

2.2 DIRECT CALENDARING OF CRIMINAL CASES

When a criminal case is filed either by complaint or indictment, the matter shall be assigned, after arraignment, to one judicial officer for all purposes. All criminal cases shall be heard first in an arraignment department of the court and from that department the case shall be assigned to one of the judicial officers in the Criminal Division of the court and the parties shall be notified in open court and on the record of the name of the judicial officer so assigned. The assignment to the judicial officer shall be deemed for all purposes.

If the parties are not notified of the assignment to one judicial officer for all purposes in

open court, then the Clerk of the Court, after a judicial officer is selected, shall send a written notification to all parties by first class mail and file in the court file a verification of mailing.

(Rule 2.2 amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective January 1, 2010.)

2.3 PROCEDURE

a. PETITIONS PER PENAL CODE SECTION 1203.4 AND 1203.4a
Any defendant wishing to file a petition for relief per Penal Code sections 1203.4
or 1203.4a and who wishes to have their costs waived shall file a completed
financial declaration on a form designated by the court. The form shall be filed
concurrently with the petition.
(Subd. (a) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

b. ORDERS SHORTENING TIME
Regarding pretrial motions governed by Rule of Court 4.111, when good cause
exists, the court may prescribe a shorter time for the service and filing of a notice
of motion and supporting papers sua sponte or if the party seeking to shorten the
time files an Application for Ex Parte Order Shortening Time with the court. A
party filing an Application for Ex Parte Order Shortening Time must notify all

2-1

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 2 – Criminal and Traffic Infraction Cases

PART ONE: Rules Applicable to Misdemeanors and Felonies

parties no later than 10:00 a.m. the court day before the ex parte appearance, absent

a showing of exceptional circumstances that justify a shorter time for notice. Notice may be given by telephone. The application shall be accompanied by an affidavit or declaration setting forth facts showing good cause for the order and showing that notice was given to each party of the ex parte hearing. The application shall also be accompanied by a proposed order, as well as by the notice of motion and supporting papers. (Subd. (b) adopted effective July 1, 2014.)

(Rule 2.3 amended effective July 1, 2014; adopted effective January 1, 2013; prior Rule 2.3, adopted effective January 1, 1998, repealed effective January 1, 2013.)

2.4 PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES [Repealed]

(Rule 2.4 repealed effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective January 1, 1998.)

2.5 – 2.49 [Reserved]

2-2

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 2 – Criminal and Traffic Infraction Cases PART TWO: Felony Criminal Cases

2.50 – 2.99 [Reserved]

2-3

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 2 – Criminal and Traffic Infraction Cases PART THREE: Misdemeanor Cases

2.100 – 2.149 [Reserved]

2-4

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 2 – Criminal and Traffic Infraction Cases PART FOUR: Traffic Infraction Cases

2.150 – 2.199 [Reserved]

2-5

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 3 – Civil Cases

3.1 APPLICATION OF RULES

Rule 3 shall apply to all civil cases, limited and unlimited, filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Solano. Unless otherwise specified elsewhere in the local rules, Rule 3 shall not apply to matters filed under the California Family Code (including adoptions and petitions to terminate parental rights), small claims cases, unlawful detainer cases, probate cases, mental health cases, juvenile cases, or extraordinary writs.

Any reference in these rules to “attorney” or “counsel” shall apply equally to any person representing himself or herself in a case subject to these rules.

(Rule 3.1 amended effective July 1, 2011; adopted effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective October 1, 2002, January 1, 2009, and January 1, 2010.)

3.2 DIRECT CALENDARING OF CIVIL CASES; ASSIGNMENTS AND REASSIGNMENTS

When a civil case is filed, or received and filed as a transfer from another county, the Clerk of the Court shall assign the case to one of the judges in the Civil Division of the court. The assignment to a judge shall be deemed to be for all purposes. The method of selection of the judge to be assigned to a case shall be subject to the approval of the Supervising Judge of the Civil Division and shall be designed to equally distribute the workload among the judges of the Civil Division and best serve the court.

When a judicial officer is disqualified in a civil matter, either on a peremptory challenge, for cause, or by the judicial officer’s own determination, the matter shall be reassigned per

Rule 1.4. A matter reassigned to another judicial officer for any other reason shall likewise be for all purposes, unless otherwise ordered by the Presiding Judge or Supervising Judge of the Civil Division.

This rule does not apply to limited jurisdiction collection actions that qualify under California Rules of Court, rule 3.740, except that a judge may be assigned in those cases upon any of the following events: (1) The plaintiff’s failure to file proof of service or obtain order for publication of summons within 180 days of the filing of the complaint; (2) the plaintiff’s failure to obtain default judgment within 360 days of the filing of the complaint, if no responsive pleading has been filed; or (3) upon the filing of a responsive pleading by a defendant.

(Rule 3.2 amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective January 1, 2009, and July 1, 2011.)

3-1

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 3 – Civil Cases

3.3 NOTIFICATION OF PLAINTIFF OF ASSIGNMENT TO ONE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES

Upon the filing of the complaint, the Clerk of the Court shall notify plaintiff, plaintiff’s attorney, or an agent of the plaintiff of the assignment to one judge for all purposes; and, if in person, the person receiving notice shall sign an acknowledgement of the notification on a form to be prepared by the Clerk of the Court indicating thereon that the notification is received on behalf of plaintiff. The clerk shall file the acknowledgement of the notification in the court file with an attached proof of personal service. If the notification of the plaintiff, his attorney or agent is not in person and acknowledged in writing, then the clerk shall mail a notice to plaintiff at his or her address of record by first class mail and file a proof of mailing in the court file.

Plaintiff shall promptly notify all parties in the case at the time the assignment is made and notify all parties who later enter the case and file with the court a proof of service of such notification of the assignment to a judge for all purposes within five (5) days after the notice is served.

(Rule 3.3 amended effective July 1, 2010; adopted effective January 1, 1998.)

3.4 DESIGNATION OF COURT [Repealed]

(Rule 3.4 repealed effective July 1, 2011; adopted effective January 1, 1998; amended effective October 1, 2002, and July 1, 2010.)

3.5 CALENDARING OF HEARINGS

With the exception of ex parte matters, all hearings shall be scheduled through the Civil Division calendar clerk.

(Rule 3.5 adopted effective July 1, 2011.)

3.6 DEPOSIT OF JURY FEES

Advance jury fees in the amount of one hundred and fifty dollars ($150.00) shall be deposited with the Clerk of the Court in compliance with Code of Civil Procedure section 631. Jury fees deposited after June 27, 2012, are nonrefundable.

(Rule 3.6 amended effective July 1, 2013; adopted as Rule 3.10 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective October 1, 2002; previously amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; amended effective July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2013.)

3-2

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 3 – Civil Cases

3.7 FORFEITURE OF JURY FEES PER CCP SECTION 631.3

For purposes of Rule 3.6 and per Code of Civil Procedure section 631.3, it is deemed necessary for the court to have at least five court days notice of waiver of jury, continuance or settlement of the case in order to notify the jurors that the trial will not proceed at the time set. Failure to notify the court in writing of a waiver of jury, continuance of a jury trial date, or settlement of a case set for trial at least five court days prior to the assigned date of trial shall result in the forfeiture of the jury fee deposit.

Because jury fees deposited after June 27, 2012, are nonrefundable, this local rule shall apply only to cases where jury fees were deposited on or before June 27, 2012.

(Rule 3.7 amended effective July 1, 2013; adopted as Rule 3.11 effective January 1, 1998; amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; amended effective July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2013.)

3.8 NOTIFICATION TO COURT OF DROPS, CONTINUANCES AND STIPULATIONS

When a matter is to be dropped, continued or stipulated to, counsel for the moving party shall promptly notify the department of the court to which the matter is assigned. No matters will be continued after announcement of a tentative ruling thereon, except by order of the court for good cause.

No matter shall be continued unless the department of the court to which the matter is assigned approves of the continuance date. Any continuance requested within forty-eight (48) hours of the hearing date shall be directed to the department in which the hearing is scheduled for approval.

In the absence of a showing of good cause by counsel, no matter shall be continued on the law and motion calendar pursuant to stipulation of counsel, or otherwise, more than twice.

(Rule 3.8 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 3.13 effective January 1, 1998; former Rule 3.8, which concerned the court case number, repealed effective January 1, 2010.)

3-3

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 3 – Civil Cases a. AVAILABILITY OF TENTATIVE RULINGS
Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308, the court has adopted a tentative rulings
procedure for civil law and motion. A tentative ruling on a civil matter will be
available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the scheduled
hearing on that matter by signing onto the court’s web site at
www.solano.courts.ca.gov and selecting “Tentative Rulings,” or by telephoning
(707) 207-7331. Tentative rulings will not be posted for unlawful detainer matters.
(Subd (a) amended effective July 1, 2015; adopted as Rule 3.14 effective January
1, 1998; previously amended effective October 1, 2002; amended and relettered
effective January 1, 2010; previously amended effective July 1, 2011, January 1,
2012, and July 1, 2013.)

b. NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO APPEAR AT HEARING
The tentative ruling shall become the ruling of the court unless a party desiring to
be heard notifies the court and all other parties of the party’s intention to appear.

The party desiring to be heard shall advise the court of his or her intention to appear
by doing either of the following no later than 4:30 p.m. on the court day preceding
the hearing:
(1) Submitting a Request for Oral Argument through the court’s website; or,
(2) Telephoning the department hearing the matter at the telephone number
indicated in the tentative ruling.

In either case, the party giving notice of his or her intention to appear shall advise
the court that the party has notified all other parties of the party’s intention to appear
and argue.
(Subd (b) amended effective July 1, 2017; adopted as Rule 3.15 effective January
1, 1998; relettered as subd (b) effective January 1, 2010; previously amended
effective July 1, 2010 and January 1, 2016.)

c. ARGUMENT ON TENTATIVE RULING
Where an appearance has been requested or invited by the court, limited argument
will be entertained, not to exceed 20 minutes per case. Appearances may be made
telephonically, in accordance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.670 and Solano
County Local Rules, rule 4.12(h), unless the court orders a personal appearance.
(Subd (c) amended effective July 1, 2011; adopted as Rule 3.16 effective January
1, 1998; previously amended effective January 1, 2009; relettered effective
January 1, 2010.)

3-4

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 3 – Civil Cases

d. NOTICE OF TENTATIVE RULINGS SYSTEM TO BE INCLUDED IN NOTICE OF
MOTION
All motions shall include notice of this local rule in substantially the following
form: “Notice: The Superior Court in and for Solano County has adopted a tentative
rulings system that is described in the court’s local Rule 3.9. Failure to comply
with Rule 3.9 may seriously affect parties’ rights in this case.”
(Subd. (d) adopted effective January 1, 2012.)

(Rule 3.9 amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted as Rule 3.14 effective January 1,
1998; previously amended effective October 1, 2002; amended and renumbered as Rule
3.9 effective January 1, 2010; amended effective July 1, 2010, July 1, 2011, January 1,
2012, July 1, 2013, and July 1, 2015.)

3.10 TELEPHONIC APPEARANCES

Litigants or counsel wishing to appear by telephone per California Rules of Court, rule 3.670 shall refer to the Court’s website at www.solano.courts.ca.gov and follow the procedures as set forth on the website. Litigants or counsel wishing to appear telephonically shall be responsible for all fees and costs charged by the service provider.

(Rule 3.10 amended effective July 1, 2017; adopted effective July 1, 2014.)

3.11 FAILURE TO NOTIFY COURT WHEN ATTORNEY CANNOT BE PRESENT SHALL BE DEEMED SUFFICIENT CAUSE TO ORDER OFF CALENDAR

If an attorney cannot be present on time at the call of the matter on calendar, he or she must, prior to the call, inform the courtroom clerk of that department of the reason for and extent of such delay. Failure to appear or furnish such information shall be deemed sufficient cause for ordering the matter off calendar or for proceeding to hear the matter in the absence of counsel, as the court, in its discretion, may determine.

(Rule 3.11 renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 3.19 effective January 1, 1998.)

3-5

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 3 – Civil Cases

3.12 OFF CALENDAR

A law and motion matter that has gone off calendar may be restored thereto only upon notice, excepting in an extraordinary situation, to be determined by the court in its discretion.

(Rule 3.12 renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 3.20 effective January 1, 1998; former Rule 3.12, which concerned the California Rules of Court, repealed effective January 1, 2010.)

3.13 EX PARTE MATTERS

Ex parte matters will be heard daily only upon appointment scheduled directly with the designated department. The date and time of the ex parte hearing must be confirmed with the designated department prior to the moving party giving notice of the hearing. For purposes of this rule, the designated department is the department already assigned to the case, or, if the case has not yet been assigned to a department or judicial officer, the designated department is the department assigned by the Supervising Judge.

The ex parte application shall comply with California Rules of Court 3.1200-3.1207, and shall be heard only upon presentation of a receipt demonstrating payment of the requisite filing fees.

On the day of the ex parte appearance, the moving party shall file the original motion with the clerk and pay the applicable filing fees. The party shall provide the judicial officer with a copy of the receipt showing the payment of fees to the court at the time of the ex parte appearance; otherwise, the hearing shall not take place.

(Rule 3.13 amended effective July 1, 2013; adopted as Rule 3.21 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1, 2005; previously amended effective July 1, 2009; renumbered as Rule 3.13 effective January 1, 2010; amended effective July 1, 2010; amended effective July 1, 2011.)

3.14 ORDERS REGARDING ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE, TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS, AND INJUNCTIONS [Repealed]

(Rule 3.14 repealed effective July 1, 2011; adopted as Rule 3.25 effective January 1, 1998; renumbered effective January 1, 2010.)

3-6

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 3 – Civil Cases

3.15 MOTIONS TO CONSOLIDATE

Motions to consolidate cases shall be heard in the department to which the case with the lowest file number is assigned.

In the event that cases are consolidated and unless otherwise ordered by the judicial officer hearing the consolidation motion, the pleadings filed thereafter shall be filed in the case file with the lowest file number and the consolidated case shall be assigned for all purposes to the judge to which the case with the lowest file number is assigned.

(Rule 3.15 amended effective July 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 3.26 effective January 1, 1998; renumbered as Rule 3.15 effective January 1, 2010.)

3.16 MOTIONS PAPERS

Motions papers must be received within three court days of reserving a law and motion date. If papers are not received within three court days, the date reserved will be canceled.

(Rule 3.16 amended effective July 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 3.27 effective October 1, 2002; renumbered as Rule 3.16 effective January 1, 2010.)

3.17 MANDATE ACTIONS ARISING UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)

a. WHERE FILED
Mandamus actions challenging an agency decision under the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §21000 et seq.) (“CEQA”)
shall be filed in the office of the Civil Clerk of the Court. Each action shall be
accompanied by an initial filing form designating the action as Environmental Law
– CEQA (Public Resources Code § 21167.1), and shall be assigned to the
designated CEQA department for all purposes.
(Subd (a) amended effective July 1, 2010; adopted effective July 1, 2005.)

b. MEDIATION
In accordance with Government Code section 66031, within five (5) days after the
deadline for respondent or defendant to file a response to the action, plaintiff or
petitioner shall prepare and lodge with the designated CEQA department a notice
form for the court’s signature inviting mediation. The court shall then mail the
notice of invitation to the parties.
(Subd (b) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2010; adopted as subd (c)
effective July 1, 2005; prior subd (b), concerning ordering the administrative

3-7

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 3 – Civil Cases

record, repealed effective July 1, 2010.)

c. PREPARING THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

(1) Preparation by the Public Agency

(a) Within twenty (20) calendar days after receipt of a request to prepare
the administrative record, the public agency responsible for such
preparation shall personally serve on petitioners a preliminary
notification of the estimated cost of preparation, setting forth the
agency’s normal costs per page, other reasonable costs, if any, the
agency anticipates, and the likely range of pages. This notice shall
also state, to the extent then known, the location(s) of the documents
anticipated to be incorporated into the administrative record, shall
designate the contact person(s) responsible for identifying the
agency personnel or other person(s) having custody of those
documents, and shall provide a listing of dates and times when those
documents will be made available to petitioners or any party for
inspection during normal business hours as the record is being
prepared. This notice shall be supplemented by the agency from
time to time as additional documents are located or determined
appropriate to be included in the record.
(Subd (a) relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Subd
(d)(1) effective July 1, 2005.)

(b) Upon receipt of this preliminary notification, petitioners may elect
to prepare the record themselves provided they notify the agency
within five (5) calendar days of such receipt. If petitioners so elect,
then within forty (40) calendar days of service of the initial notice
to prepare the administrative record, petitioners shall prepare and
serve on all parties a detailed index listing the documents proposed
by petitioners to constitute the record. Within seven (7) calendar
days of this notification, the agency and/or other parties shall
prepare and serve the petitioners and all parties with a document
notifying them of any document(s) or item(s) that such parties
contend should be added to, or deleted from, the record. The agency
shall promptly notify petitioners of any required photocopying
procedures and/or conditions with which petitioners must comply in
their preparation of the record.
(Subd (b) relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Subd
(d)(2) effective July 1, 2005.)

3-8

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 3 – Civil Cases

(c) If petitioners do not so elect, then within forty (40) calendar days
after service of the request to prepare the administrative record, the
agency shall prepare and serve on the parties a detailed index listing
the documents proposed by the agency to constitute the record and
provide a supplemental estimated cost of preparation. Within seven
(7) calendar days of receipt of this notification, petitioners and/or
any other parties shall prepare and serve the agency and all parties
with a document notifying the agency of any document(s) or item(s)
that such parties contend should be added to, or deleted from, the
record.
(Subd (c) relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Subd
(d)(3) effective July 1, 2005.)
(Subd (1) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective July 1,
2005.)

(2) Preparation by Petitioners

(a) Within twenty (20) calendar days after receipt of petitioners’ notice
of election to prepare the record themselves, the public agency
responsible for certification of the record shall personally serve on
petitioners a preliminary notification designating, to the extent then
known, the location(s) of the documents anticipated to be
incorporated into the administrative record, the contact person(s)
responsible for identifying the agency personnel or other person(s)
having custody of those documents, and the dates and times when
those documents will be made available to petitioners or any party
for their inspection and copying. This notice shall also state any
required photocopying procedures and/or conditions with which
petitioners must comply in their preparation of the record. This
notice shall be supplemented by the agency as additional documents
are located or determined appropriate to be included in the record.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2005.)

(b) Within forty (40) calendar days after service of petitioners’ notice
of election, petitioners shall prepare and serve on all parties a
detailed index listing the documents proposed by petitioners to
constitute the record. Within seven (7) calendar days of this
notification, the agency and/or other parties shall prepare and serve
the petitioners and all parties with a document notifying them of any
document(s) or item(s) that such parties contend should be added to,
or deleted from, the record.

3-9

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 3 – Civil Cases

(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2005.)

(Subd (2) renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Subd (d)(4)
effective July 1, 2005.)

(Subd (c) relettered effective July 1, 2010; adopted as subd (d) effective July 1,
2005; amended effective January 1, 2010.)

d. FORMAT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
The format of the administrative record shall be governed by California Rules of
Court, rules 3.1365 and either 3.1367 or 3.1368, as appropriate.
(Subd (d) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2010; adopted as subd (e)
effective July 1, 2005.)

e. LODGING THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT
Any party lodging the administrative record in an electronic format as permitted by
California Rules of Court, rule 3.1365 et seq. shall simultaneously file a declaration
with the court affirming under penalty of perjury that the medium in which the
record is contained and lodged with the court is free of computer viruses or other
malware.
(Subd (e) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2010; adopted as subd (f)
effective July 1, 2005.)

f. DISPUTES REGARDING THE CONTENTS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
Once the record has been filed, any disputes about its accuracy or scope should be
resolved by appropriate noticed motion. For example, if the agency has prepared
the record, petitioners may contend that it omits important documents or that it
contains inappropriate documents; if the petitioners have prepared the record, the
agency may have similar contentions. A motion to supplement the certified record
with additional documents and/or to exclude certain documents from the record
may be noticed by any party and should normally be filed concurrently with the
filing of petitioners’ opening memorandum of points and authorities in support of
the writ. Opposition and reply memoranda on the motion should normally be filed
with the opposition and memoranda, respectively, regarding the writ. The motion
should normally be calendared for hearing
concurrently with the hearing on the writ.
(Subd (f) relettered effective July 1, 2010; adopted as subd (g) effective July 1,
2005.)

3-10

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 3 – Civil Cases

g. BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND LENGTH OF MEMORANDA
Unless otherwise ordered by the court, the following briefing schedule shall be
followed in all cases:

(1) Petitioners shall file directly in the designated CEQA department and serve
personally, by overnight mail or, if previously agreed, by fax or electronic
service, an opening memorandum of points and authorities in support of the
petition within thirty (30) days from the date the administrative record is
served.

(2) Respondent and Real Party in Interest shall file directly in the designated
CEQA department and serve personally, by overnight mail, or if previously
agreed, by fax or electronic service, opposition points and authorities, if any,
within thirty (30) days following service of petitioners’ memoranda of
points and authorities.

(3) Petitioners shall have twenty (20) days from service of the opposition’s
points and authorities to file directly in the designated CEQA department
and serve personally, by overnight mail, or if previously agreed, by fax or
electronic service, a reply memorandum of points and authorities.

(4) The parties may agree upon a shorter time frame for briefing by written
stipulation filed with the court.

(Subd (g) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2010; adopted as subd (i)
effective July 1, 2005.)

h. TRIAL NOTEBOOK
Petitioner shall prepare a trial notebook which shall be filed with the designated
CEQA Department fourteen (14) days before the date of the hearing. The trial
notebook shall consist of the petition, the answer(s), the briefs, any motions set to
be heard at trial, the statement of issues, and any other document(s) agreed upon by
the parties or ordered by the court.
(Subd (h) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2010; adopted as subd (j)
effective July 1, 2005; previous subd (h), concerning notice of hearing, repealed
effective July 1, 2010.)

(Rule 3.17 amended effective July 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 3.28 effective July 1, 2005;
amended and renumbered as Rule 3.17 effective January 1, 2010.)

3-11

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 3 – Civil Cases

3.18 FILING OF NOTICES OF UNAVAILABILITY

The court shall not accept for filing a "Notice of Unavailability of Counsel" or other document or pleading whose sole purpose is to advise the court and/or other parties of an attorney's or party's unavailability. (Carl v. Superior Court of Orange County (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 73.)

(Rule 3.18 renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 3.29 effective January 1, 2009.)

3-12

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation (Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

4.1 SCOPE AND POLICY

a. SCOPE OF RULE 4
Rule 4 is intended to implement the Trial Court Delay Reduction Act (Government
Code section 68600 et seq.) and shall apply to all general civil actions. The term
“general civil action” shall have the same meaning as set forth in California Rules
of Court, rule 1.6, subdivision (4).

Rule 4 shall not apply to uninsured motorist cases, coordinated cases, or collections
cases unless and until they become subject to the Trial Court Delay Reduction Act
per California Rule of Court, rule 3.712.
(Subd (a) amended effective July 1, 2011; adopted effective January 1, 1998;
previously amended effective July 1, 2005, and January 1, 2010.)

b. POLICY AND CASE DISPOSITION STANDARDS
It is the policy of this court that all civil cases shall be resolved as expeditiously as
possible, consistent with the obligation of the courts to give full and careful
consideration to the issues presented, and consistent with the right of the parties to
adequately prepare and present their cases to the court. Furthermore, it is the policy
of the court that all actions subject to these rules shall be actively managed,
supervised and controlled by the court from the time of filing of the first document
invoking the court’s jurisdiction through final disposition. This court’s case
disposition standards are as set forth in California Rules of Court, rule 3.714,
subdivision (b).
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective January 1, 1998;
previously amended effective July 1, 2005.)

c. APPLICABILITY OF RULE 4 TO OTHER RULES
Notwithstanding Rule 4.1, subsection (a), any rule within Rule 4 may be made
expressly applicable to other proceedings through the enactment of or amendment
to a local rule governing that proceeding.
(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective January 1, 2009.)

(Rule 4.1 amended effective July 1, 2011; adopted effective January 1, 1998; previously
amended effective July 1, 2005, January 1, 2009, and January 1, 2010.)

4-1

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation (Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

4.2 CASE DESIGNATION

a. DEFAULT DESIGNATION OF CASE; TIMING OF DESIGNATION
All civil cases subject to these rules shall be classified as TRACK A cases unless,
on good cause shown, the court designates the case as a TRACK B case or TRACK
C (complex) litigation. The determination as to whether a case is designated as a
TRACK B or TRACK C case under these rules shall be at the sole discretion of the
court. The designation may be made by the court at any case management
conference, trial management conference, mandatory settlement conference, or any
hearing noticed by the court or counsel.
(Subd (a) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 4.2 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1,
2005.)

b. TRACK A CASES
TRACK A cases are cases that are to be resolved within twelve (12) months of the
date that the complaint was filed.
(Subd (b) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 4.2 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1,
2005.)

c. TRACK B AND TRACK C CASES
TRACK B and TRACK C cases are those which generally involve multiple parties,
complex issues, difficult legal questions, unusual proof problems, or other
circumstances which result in a case not being adequately prepared for trial within
twelve (12) months of its filing even with due diligence being exercised by all
parties. It is the policy of the court to conclude all TRACK B cases within eighteen
(18) months and TRACK C cases within twenty-four (24) months of the filing of
the initial pleading.
(Subd (c) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 4.2 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1,
2005.)

d. REDESIGNATION OF CASE
Following the designation by the court of the case as TRACK A, TRACK B, or
TRACK C, the court, on its own motion or on the motion of any party, may order
the case redesignated.
(Subd (d) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 4.2 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1,
2005.)

4-2

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation (Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

(Rule 4.2 amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1, 2005.)

4.3 TIME REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLAINT

Time requirements for service of the complaint shall be as specified by California Rules of Court, rules 3.110 and 3.740, subdivision (c).

(Rule 4.3 amended effective July 1, 2011; adopted effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective October 1, 2002, and January 1, 2009.)

4.4 TIME REQUIREMENTS FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS

Time requirements for service of responsive pleadings shall be as specified by California Rules of Court, rules 3.110, 3.740, subdivision (c), and 3.1320.

(Rule 4.4 amended effective July 1, 2011; adopted effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective October 1, 2002, January 1, 2009, and January 1, 2010.)

4.5 TIME REQUIREMENTS FOR CROSS-COMPLAINTS

Time requirements for service of cross-complaints shall be as specified by California Rules of Court, rules 3.110 and 3.1320.

(Rule 4.5 amended effective July 1, 2011; adopted effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective October 1, 2002, and January 1, 2010.)

4.6 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES

a. SCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ONE
In all cases subject to the case management rules in California Rules of Court, rule
3.720 et seq., the Clerk of the Court will schedule the first Case Management
Conference approximately 120 days from the date of filing of the complaint. At the
time of filing of the complaint, the Clerk of the Court shall provide the plaintiff
with a Notice of Case Management Conference One, which shall indicate the date,
time, and place that counsel, and any party not represented by counsel, shall appear
for Case Management Conference One, and shall state the obligations of counsel,
or any parties not represented by counsel, in regard to Case Management
Conference One and Case Management Conference Two. Plaintiff is responsible

4-3

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation
(Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

for notifying all defendants of the initial or any continued Case Management
Conference dates.
(Subd (a) amended effective July 1, 2011; adopted as unlettered portion of Rule 4.6
effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective October 1, 2002, July 1,
2005, and January 1, 2009; amended and relettered effective January 1, 2010.)

b. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES IN “UNINSURED MOTORIST” CASES
An action for personal injury or property damage against an uninsured defendant
may be designated as an “uninsured motorist case” upon application of the plaintiff
filed concurrently with the petition or within thirty (30) days of the commencement
of the action. Upon the filing of such an application, the court will set the first Case
Management Conference approximately 180 days from the date of the designation.
(Subd (b) amended effective July 1, 2011; adopted as Subd (a) of Rule 4.6 effective
January 1, 1998; previously amended effective October 1, 2002, July 1, 2005, and
January 1, 2009; relettered effective January 1, 2010.)

c. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES IN LIMITED JURISDICTION “COLLECTION”
CASES
The plaintiff may designate a limited jurisdiction case as a “collection” case by
filing a Civil Case Cover Sheet describing the case as a “collections” matter. No
case management conference will be scheduled unless and until a responsive
pleading has been filed.
(Subd (c) relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Subd (b) of Rule 4.6
effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective October 1, 2002, July 1,
2005, and January 1, 2009.)

d. SERVICE OF NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

(1) Service of Notice with Complaint
The plaintiff shall serve the Notice of Case Management Conference on all
defendants with the complaint.
(Subd (1) renumbered effective January 1, 2010; previously adopted as
portion of Subd (f) effective January 1, 1998.)

(2) Service of Notice with Cross-Complaint
Any plaintiff and any defendant serving a cross-complaint shall serve a copy
of the Notice of Case Management Conference One provided by the Clerk,
which sets the date and place for Case Management One, on each cross-
defendant with the cross-complaint. In the event that any cross-complaint
is served after Case Management Conference One has been held, the cross-

4-4

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation
(Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

complainant, at the time of service of the cross-complaint, shall serve each
cross-defendant with Notice of Case Management Conference Two, which
shall contain the date, time and place of Case Management Conference Two
and explain the obligations of the parties in regard to case management
conferences under these rules.
(Subd (2) renumbered effective January 1, 2010; previously adopted as
portion of Subd (f) effective January 1, 1998.)

(Subd (d) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Subd (f) of
Rule 4.6 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective October 1, 2002,
July 1, 2005, and January 1, 2009; former Subd (d) repealed effective January 1,
2010.)

e. TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES
Litigants or counsel wishing to appear by telephone per California Rules of Court,

rule 3.670 shall refer to the Court’s website at www.solano.courts.ca.gov and follow the procedures as set forth on the website. Litigants or counsel wishing to appear telephonically shall be responsible for all fees and costs charged by the service provider. (Subd (e) amended effective July 1, 2017; adopted effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective October 1, 2002, July 1, 2005, January 1, 2009, and January 1, 2010.)

f. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SETTING

(1) For all cases subject to Rule 4.6, subdivision (a), Case Management
Conference One shall be set during the calendar week that is 120 calendar
days after the filing of the complaint, on the day of week and at the time
designated by the judge to whom the case is assigned for all purposes. Case
management conferences for other cases shall be set in a similar manner per
the timelines applicable to those cases.
(Subd (1) amended effective July 1, 2011; adopted effective January 1,
1998.)

(2) At Case Management Conference One, the court shall refer the matter to
arbitration or mediation, if deemed appropriate by the court, continue the
matter for further Case Management Conference One or set the matter for a
Case Management Conference Two.
(Subd (2) adopted effective January 1, 1998.)

4-5

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation
(Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

(3) The court may, in its discretion, require additional case management
conferences and additional Case Management Statements.
(Subd (3) adopted effective January 1, 2010; previously adopted as portion
of Subd (h).)

(Subd (f) amended effective July 1, 2011; adopted as Subd (g) effective January 1,
1998; previously amended effective October 1, 2002, July 1, 2005, and January 1,
2009; amended and relettered effective January 1, 2010.)

g. UPDATED CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS FOR CONTINUED CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES
Unless otherwise ordered by the court, an updated Case Management Statement
shall be filed by each counsel no later than the fifteenth (15th) calendar day before
each continued Case Management Conference or any review set by the court.
(Subd (g) amended effective July 1, 2011; adopted as Subd (h) effective January 1,
1998; previously amended effective October 1, 2002, July 1, 2005, and January 1,
2009; amended and relettered effective January 1, 2010.)

h. SANCTIONS
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 575.2, the court may impose sanctions
in the event that any of the following occur:
(1) A Case Management Statement is not timely filed and/or served;
(2) A Case Management Statement is not fully completed;
(3) The attorney who appears at a case management conference is not
completely aware of all procedural, factual, and legal aspects of the case
and does not have full authority to discuss and resolve any issues that arise
at the conference, including the settlement of the case. This rule applies
equally to counsel of record and special appearance counsel;
(4) Counsel and self-represented parties fail to meet and confer as required per
California Rules of Court, rule 3.724 prior to the Case Management
Conference concerning all issues before the court.
(Subd (h) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Subd (i)
effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective October 1, 2002, July 1,
2005, and January 1, 2009.)

(Rule 4.6 amended effective July 1, 2011; adopted effective January 1, 1998; previously
amended effective October 1, 2002, July 1, 2005, and January 1, 2009; amended effective
January 1, 2010.)

4-6

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation (Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

4.7 DIVERSION TO ARBITRATION

a. ORDER TO NONBINDING ARBITRATION

(1) The following matters shall be subject to judicial nonbinding arbitration:
(a) All nonexempt unlimited civil actions in which the amount in
controversy does not exceed $50,000.
(b) All nonexempt limited civil cases, except for small claims actions
or any action maintained pursuant to Civil Code section 1781 or
Code of Civil Procedure section 1161.
(c) Any matter in which the parties stipulate to arbitration, provided the
stipulation is filed no later than the time the initial case management
statement is filed, unless the court permits a later time.

(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1) above, matters that have been referred to
mandatory mediation per local rule 4.8 shall not be referred to arbitration.

(3) As to those cases ordered to arbitration, judicial arbitration will proceed in
accordance with the Judicial Arbitration rules for civil cases (California
Rules of Court, rule 3.810 et seq.), except as otherwise stated in these rules.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective January 1, 1998;
previously amended effective October 1, 200, and January 1, 20102.)

b. SELECTION OF ARBITRATOR

(1) If the parties have a preference for an arbitrator, counsel shall provide the
name, address, and telephone number of the preferred arbitrator to the
court’s ADR Administrator within twenty (20) days of the referral to
arbitration. The statement of preference is not binding on the court, but
may be considered in selecting the arbitrator.

(2) The court shall select the arbitrator from the court’s list of arbitrators. The
court shall notify the parties of the name, address, and telephone number of
the arbitrator selected by the court within thirty (30) days of the referral to
arbitration.
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective January 1, 1998;
previously amended effective October 1, 2002, and January 1, 2010.)

(Rule 4.7 amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective January 1, 1998;
previously amended effective October 1, 2002, and January 1, 2010.)

4-7

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation (Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

4.8 MEDIATION

a. ADOPTION OF CIVIL ACTION MEDIATION PROGRAM (CCP § 1775 ET SEQ.)
Effective January 1, 2012, and per the authority in Code of Civil Procedure section
1775.2, subdivision (b), the court adopts the Civil Action Mediation Program set
forth in Title 11.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Mediations conducted per the
Civil Action Mediation Program (“the Mediation Program”) in Solano County shall
be subject to all applicable statutes and California Rules of Court concerning the
Civil Action Mediation Program (e.g. Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.870 et seq.).
(Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2012; prior subd. (a) relettered as subd. (d)
effective January 1, 2012.)

b. MATTERS TO WHICH MEDIATION PROGRAM APPLIES
The following matters shall be subject to mandatory mediation:
(1) All nonexempt unlimited civil actions filed on or after January 1, 2012, in
which the amount in controversy does not exceed $50,000.
(2) All nonexempt limited civil cases filed on or after January 1, 2012, except
for small claims actions.
(3) Any matter, regardless of filing date or the amount in controversy, in which
the parties stipulate to mediation, provided the stipulation is filed at least
ninety (90) days prior to trial, unless the court permits a later time.
(Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2012; prior subd. (b) repealed effective
January 1, 2012.)

c. ORDER TO MEDIATION
Cases shall be referred to mediation whenever the court determines from the facts
as set forth in a Case Management Statement or as stated by counsel at any Case
Management Conference, Trial Management Conference, or Mandatory Settlement
Conference that the matter is subject to mandatory mediation per these rules and
has not already been referred to mediation or any form of arbitration, unless good
cause is found to not refer the matter.
(Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2012; prior subd. (c) repealed effective
January 1, 2012.)

4-8

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation
(Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

d. SELECTION OF MEDIATOR

(1) If the parties have a preference for a mediator, counsel shall provide the
name, address, and telephone number of the preferred mediator to the
court’s ADR Administrator within twenty (20) days of the referral to
mediation. The statement of preference is not binding on the court, but
may be considered in selecting the mediator.
(Subd. (1) amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2012.)

(2) The court shall select the mediator from the court’s list of mediators. The
court shall notify the parties of the name, address, and telephone number of
the mediator selected by the court within thirty (30) days of the referral to
mediation.
(Subd. (2) amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2012.)

(Subd (d) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2012; adopted as subd. (a)
effective July 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1, 2005.)

e. APPEARANCE AT MEDIATION SESSIONS

(1) For purposes of California Rules of Court 3.894, subsection (a), when a
party is other than a natural person, it shall appear at the mediation sessions
through a representative, other than the party’s attorney, with full authority
to resolve the dispute or, in the case of a governmental entity that requires
an agreement to be approved by an elected official or legislative body, by a
representative with authority to recommend such agreement. Failure of the
representative to appear at the mediation session may be cause for sanctions.
(Subd. (1) amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2012.)

(2) “Full authority” to resolve the dispute means the person is empowered to
make settlement decisions without telephone consultation with others.
(Subd. (2) adopted effective January 1, 2012.)

(Subd (e) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2012; adopted as subd. (b)
effective July 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1, 2005; prior subd. (e)
relettered as subd. (j) effective January 1, 2012.)

4-9

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation
(Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

f. RELATED, COORDINATED, AND CONSOLIDATED CASES
Counsel in cases that have been related, coordinated, or consolidated shall inform
the court of all pending mediation proceedings in the related, coordinated, or
consolidated cases.
(Subd. (f) adopted effective January 1, 2012.)

g. INTERPRETERS
Any party desiring to use an interpreter during mandatory mediation must notify
the ADR Administrator, all other parties, and the mediator at least 10 days prior to
the first mediation session at which the interpreter will be used. Unless otherwise
ordered by the court, the party seeking the use of the interpreter shall make all
arrangements directly with the interpreter and shall assume the costs of the service.
(Subd. (g) adopted effective January 1, 2012.)

h. EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS
Ex parte communications refers to communications with the mediator outside the
presence of the opposing counsel or self-represented party. Ex parte
communications with the mediator are not prohibited.
(Subd. (h) adopted effective January 1, 2012.)

i. CONFIDENTIALITY

(1) Mediations are confidential and subject to the confidentiality privilege set
forth in Evidence Code sections 703.5 and 1115 through 1128. No
communications or writings made in connection with the mediation may be
disclosed to the assigned judge or to any other person not involved in the
mediation, unless disclosure is agreed to by all parties or permitted by
subsection (2), infra. The mediator shall require the parties and all persons
attending the mediation to sign a confidentiality agreement at the first
mediation session.
(Subd. (1) adopted effective January 1, 2012.)

(2) The following disclosures are permitted:
(a) A dislosure stipulated in writing by all parties and the mediator, or
orally in compliance with Evidence Code section 1118;
(b) A report to or inquiry by the ADR Administrator concerning a
complaint against a mediator;
(c) A disclosure made by any participant or the mediator in responding
to an appropriate request for information made by persons
authorized by the ADR Administrator to monitor or evaluate the

4-10

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation
(Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

court’s mediation program;
(d) A disclosure required by law;
(e) A settlement agreement signed by all parties waiving the
confidentiality provision of Evidence Code section 1122 et seq., and
containing a provision explicitly rendering the agreement
enforceable per Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6; or,
(f) A disclosure made in connection with a request for sanctions for a
party’s noncompliance with mediation. This disclosure shall be
limited to the minimum facts needed to support the motion.
(Subd. (2) adopted effective January 1, 2012.)

(Subd. (i) adopted effective January 1, 2012.)

j. MEDIATION COMPLAINT PROCEDURE Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.868, the court adopts the following mediator complaint procedure: (1) Complaints are only accepted from a party to the action or the party’s attorney. (2) The complainant must register his or her complaint in writing with the ADR Administrator. The written complaint must include the following information: (a) The names of the parties in the case and their attorneys; (b) The case number; (c) The most recent court date; (d) The name(s) of any mediation personnel (i.e. mediators or mediation clerks) with whom the complainant had contact; and, (e) A statement explaining the reasons for the complaint. (3) Upon receiving the complaint, the ADR Administrator will notify the complainant in writing that the court has received the complaint. (4) The ADR Administrator shall review the complaint and determine whether the complaint can be informally resolved or closed, or whether the complaint warrants investigation. If the complaint warrants an investigation, the ADR Administrator shall take the following steps: (a) The ADR Administrator shall give notice of the complaint to the mediator and provide a reasonable opportunity to respond. (b) The complaint shall be investigated and a recommendation made concerning court action. The investigation shall be conducted by an investigator designated by the ADR Administrator or the Presiding Judge. The investigator shall provide his or her recommendation to the Presiding Judge or his or her designee.

4-11

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation
(Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

(c) The final decision shall be made by the Presiding Judge or his or her
designee. Notice of the final action taken shall be sent by the court
to the complainant and, if the complaint was not resolved during the
preliminary review by the ADR Administrator, to the mediator.
(Subd (j) relettered effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective January 1, 2010,
as subd. (e); previously amended effective July 1, 2011.)

k. SANCTIONS
Upon noticed motion and an opportunity to be heard, the court may impose
sanctions for failure to meaningfully participate in the mediation process.
Sanctions may include, but are not limited to, mediator’s fees and attorney fees and
costs. Willful failure to meaningfully participate includes, but is not limited to, the
following:
(1) Non-appearance at the time set for the mediation of any person necessary
to proceed to a meaningful conclusion. Telephone calls to the mediator
shall not constitute an appearance. However, upon agreement by all parties,
a party may appear by telephone or other means of real-time electronic
communication if he or she resides or has his or her primary place of
business more than 500 miles from the mediation location.
(2) Requests to continue the mediation session less than ten (10) days before
the scheduled mediation session, unless good cause is shown.
(3) Failure to complete mediation within the time fixed, unless good cause is
shown.
(Subd. (k) adopted effective January 1, 2012.)

(Rule 4.8 amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective January 1, 1998;
previously amended effective July 1, 2005, January 1, 2010, and July 1, 2011.)

4.9 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES

a. REQUIRED PARTICIPANTS The lead trial counsel, parties, and persons with full settlement authority shall personally attend the Mandatory Settlement Conference unless excused by the court for good cause. In the case of an insured principal, the authorized representative of the insured’s insurance company must be present in lieu of the client, and must have full settlement authority. For purposes of these rules, “full settlement authority” means persons physically present in the courthouse who are empowered to make settlement decisions without telephone consultation with others. In no event will an independent adjuster satisfy the above requirement. In any professional negligence case in which the defendant retains the right to refuse settlement,

4-12

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation
(Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

participation of that defendant in the settlement conference is mandatory.
(Subd (a) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 4.11 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective July
1, 2005.)

b. MEET AND CONFER REQUIREMENTS
No later than ten (10) calendar days before the date set for the mandatory settlement
conference, trial counsel and all persons with ultimate authority to settle the case
shall meet in person or, if all parties agree, by telephone to discuss settlement of
the case.
(Subd (b) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 4.11 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective July
1, 2005.)

c. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
STATEMENTS
All settlement conference statements filed and served per California Rules of Court,
rule 3.1380, subdivision (c), shall contain the following additional information:
(1) A statement of the factual and legal contentions in dispute;
(2) A list of all special damages claimed;
(3) Copies of pertinent medical reports;
(4) Other reports by experts;
(5) Pictorial or documentary evidence anticipated to be presented at trial;
(6) An estimate of the lowest and highest possible award by a trier of fact;
(7) The highest previous offer and the lowest previous demand;
(8) The date when the last face to face or telephonic settlement discussion was
held between all parties;
(9) A statement as to any special problems relating to settlement, such as lack
of or disputed insurance coverage; and,
(10) A statement regarding the party’s position regarding settlement of the case.
(Subd (c) amended effective July 1, 2011; adopted as unlettered portion of Rule
4.11 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1, 2005; amended
and relettered effective January 1, 2010.)

d. SANCTIONS
Failure of any attorney, adjustor, and/or party to prepare for, appear at, or
meaningfully participate in a settlement conference, unless good cause is shown for
any such failure, is an unlawful interference with the proceedings of the court, and
the court may impose sanctions, including but not limited to, any or all of the
following: monetary sanctions to be paid to the court; monetary sanctions to be paid

4-13

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation (Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

to other parties which may include, among other things, costs, actual expenses, and counsel fees; and the court may order an appropriate change in the calendar status of the action. (Subd (d) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as unlettered portion of Rule 4.11 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1, 2005.)

(Rule 4.9 amended effective July 1, 2011; adopted as Rule 4.11 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1, 2005; amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; former Rule 4.9, which concerned other settings of cases, repealed effective January 1, 2010.)

4.10 TRIAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES

a. REQUIRED PARTICIPANTS
The lead trial counsel shall, unless excused by the court, appear at the Trial
Management Conference prepared to respond to any questions the court may pose
about the case.
(Subd (a) relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as unlettered portion of
Rule 4.12 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1, 2005.)

b. TRIAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE REPORTS
On a form designated by the court (local form no. 3006), each counsel shall
complete, file and serve on all parties a completed Trial Management Conference
Report at least five (5) court days before the date set for the Trial Management
Conference. At a minimum, the report shall include the following:
(1) A statement of the nature of the case, with a summary of each party’s
allegations and supporting facts. Include an agreed-upon statement of the
case to be read to the jury panel, if a jury has been requested by any party;
(2) If there have been developments since the trial setting affecting the
estimated length of trial, an explanation as to what those developments are
and how the estimated length of trial should be changed as a result;
(3) The names of any non-expert witnesses who may be called at trial, except
for impeachment or rebuttal. State concisely the anticipated testimony of
each non-expert witness and the time estimate for testimony, including
direct and cross-examination;
(4) The names and expertise of any expert witnesses who may be called at trial,
except for impeachment or rebuttal. State concisely the anticipated
testimony of each expert witness and the time estimate for testimony,
including direct and cross-examination. In addition, attach any narrative

4-14

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation (Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

reports provided by the expert witness; (5) A list of all witnesses who are unavailable and whose testimony will be presented by deposition, along with the facts supporting that unavailability; (6) A list of all documents, exhibits, blowups, and/or photographs that the party expects to offer at trial, except for impeachment or rebuttal. Documents shall be identified by page number or Bates-stamp number as applicable (e.g. “Jane Doe’s Medical Records, pages 1 through 326”). Photos shall be separately identified; (7) A specific list in column form of all portions of depositions, answers to interrogatories and responses to request for admissions that the party expects to offer at trial, except for impeachment or rebuttal. All portions of depositions shall be identified by page and line number(s), while responses to written discovery must be identified by the manner of discovery request and the response number (e.g. “Response to Plaintiff’s Special Interrogatories, Set One, Interrogatory Number 4”; “Amended Response to Defendant’s Request for Admissions, Set Three, Request Number 7”); (8) A specific list of all anticipated evidentiary disputes with citation to authority; (9) A specific list of all anticipated non-evidentiary disputes with citation to authority; (10) All requested jury instructions and verdict forms in compliance with the California Rules of Court. Each instruction shall be typed in full and numbered consecutively, with the submitting attorney having filled in all blanks and having made a decision as to all alternatives in the CACI instructions. Two copies of the requested jury instructions shall be submitted to the court. One copy shall have citations to authority and boxes for the court’s use regarding whether the instruction is given, refused, or withdrawn, and one copy shall be presented without citations to authority and boxes regarding given, refused, or withdrawn; (11) Copies of all in limine motions that the party expects to submit at trial. Each in limine motion provided shall be numbered consecutively by the party. (Note that any in limine motions not included will not be considered by the court, unless good cause is presented to the trial court); (12) All stipulations requested or proposed at trial; and, (13) A statement as to whether there are any witnesses that need an interpreter. State the name of the interpreter and the language that must be interpreted. (If an interpreter is needed, it is the obligation of the party calling the witness to make arrangements for an interpreter.) (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted as unlettered portion of Rule 4.12 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1, 2005; amended

4-15

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation
(Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

and relettered effective January 1, 2010; amended effective July 1, 2011.)

c. EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY AT TRIAL
The testimony of witnesses who are not listed in the Trial Management Conference
Report, or documents, or other exhibits, portions of depositions, answers to
interrogatories or responses to requests for admissions, which are not listed in the
Trial Management Conference Report, shall not be admitted at the trial. However,
the trial judge, in his or her sole discretion and upon a showing of good cause, may
permit the testimony of witnesses who are not listed in the Trial Management
Conference Report and may allow the admission of exhibits or portions of
discovery which are not listed in the Trial Management Conference Report.
(Subd (c) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 4.12 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective July
1, 2005.)

(Rule 4.10 amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted as Rule 4.12 effective January 1,
1998; previously amended effective July 1, 2005; amended and renumbered effective
January 1, 2010; amended effective July 1, 2011; former Rule 4.10, which concerned
setting short causes for trial, repealed effective January 1, 2010.)

4.11 DISMISSAL OF ACTION OR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT FOLLOWING SETTLEMENT

Dismissals shall be governed by California Rules of Court, rule 3.1385.

(Rule 4.11 amended effective July 1, 2011; adopted as Rule 4.13 effective January 1, 1998; renumbered effective January 1, 2010.)

4.12 MISCELLANEOUS

a. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Any request for extension of time under these rules shall be filed with due diligence
and, in addition to being signed by counsel shall be endorsed by the party
acknowledging that the extension of time being requested by counsel is concurred
in by the party. The request shall be made on the form provided by the court.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2009; adopted effective January 1, 1998.)

4-16

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation
(Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

b. KNOWLEDGE OF CASE
Counsel and parties attending any hearing or conference set pursuant to these rules
shall have sufficient knowledge of the case to inform the court as to all matters that
are pertinent and relevant to the issues to be heard and have authority to enter into
binding stipulations regarding any matters before the court. This rule shall apply
equally to attorneys of record and specially appearing counsel.
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective January 1, 1998;
previously amended effective January 1, 2009.)

c. REFERENCE TO “ATTORNEY” OR “COUNSEL”
Any reference in these rules to “attorney” or “counsel” shall apply equally to any
person representing himself or herself in a case subject to these rules.
(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2009; adopted effective January 1, 1998.)

d. REMOVAL FROM CIVIL ACTIVE LIST
A case shall not be removed from the civil active list except by order of the court.
(Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2009; adopted effective January 1, 1998.)

e. EXCUSE FROM RULE REQUIREMENT
Any requirement of these rules may be excused by the court upon a showing of
good cause.
(Subd (e) amended effective January 1, 2009; adopted effective January 1, 1998.)

f. UNINSURED MOTORIST CASE [Repealed]
(Subd (f) repealed effective July 1, 2011; adopted effective January 1, 1998;
amended effective January 1, 2009.)

g. REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT [Repealed]
(Subd (g) repealed effective July 1, 2011; adopted effective January 1, 1998;
amended effective January 1, 2009.)

h. TELEPHONIC APPEARANCES
Litigants or counsel wishing to appear by telephone per California Rules of Court,
rule 3.670 shall refer to the Court’s website at www.solano.courts.ca.gov and
follow the procedures as set forth on the website. Litigants or counsel wishing to
appear telephonically shall be responsible for all fees and costs charged by the
service provider.
(Subd (h) amended effective July 1, 2017; adopted effective January 1, 2009;
previously amended effective January 1, 2010.)

4-17

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation
(Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

i. BENCH COPIES OR CHAMBERS COPIES
At the discretion of the judicial officer assigned to the case, parties may be required
to deposit an additional copy of specific documents directly with the assigned
judicial department.
(Subd (i) adopted effective July 1, 2014.)

(Rule 4.12 amended effective July 1, 2014; previously amended effective July 1, 2011;
adopted as Rule 4.14 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective January 1,
2009; amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010.)

4.13 SANCTIONS

a. SANCTIONS GENERALLY
Upon the motion of a party or on the court’s own motion, the court may impose
sanctions for non-compliance with these rules. Sanctions will not be imposed
without prior notice to, and an opportunity to be heard by, the party or attorney
against whom the sanction or penalty is sought to be imposed. Available sanctions
include, but are not limited to:
(1) Monetary sanctions;
(2) Evidentiary sanctions prohibiting the introduction of designated matters
into evidence;
(3) Striking out all or any part of any pleading;
(4) Dismissal of an action, proceeding, or any part thereof;
(5) Entering judgment by default against a party; and,
(6) Contempt sanctions.
(Subd (a) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as unlettered
part of Rule 4.15 effective January 1, 1998.)

b. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS
In addition to any sanction, the court may order a party or his or her counsel to pay
to a party moving for compliance with these rules the reasonable expenses in
making the motion, including reasonable attorney fees.
(Subd (b) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as unlettered
part of Rule 4.15 effective January 1, 1998.)

c. SANCTIONS RELATED TO REQUESTS TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING
Monetary sanctions and, in the court’s discretion, more severe sanctions, will be
imposed upon counsel or his or her party who in bad faith or without good cause
request an extension of time for the filing of any pleading or document as required
by these rules.

4-18

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation
(Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

(Subd (c) relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as unlettered part of Rule
4.15 effective January 1, 1998.)

d. SANCTIONS AGAINST ATTORNEYS
If the court determines that the failure to comply with the rules is the responsibility
of a party’s attorney or counsel, the penalty shall be imposed on the attorney or
counsel personally and shall not adversely affect the party’s cause of action or
defense thereto.
(Subd (d) adopted effective January 1, 2010.)

(Rule 4.13 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 4.15
effective January 1, 1998.)

4.14 ELECTRONIC FILING AND SERVICE OF PLEADINGS AND DOCUMENTS

The court does not permit electronic filing as defined in California Rules of Court, rule 2.250. However, nothing in this rule shall be construed as prohibiting or otherwise limiting service of documents electronically as provided elsewhere in the California Rules of Court.

(Rule 4.14 adopted effective July 1, 2010; previous Rule 4.14 renumbered as Rule 4.12 effective January 1, 2010.)

4-19

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 4 – Administration of Civil Litigation (Trial Court Delay Reduction Act)

APPENDIX

Standing Order Title

2015-001-CV Amended Standing Order for Electronic Service of Documents in Complex Litigation

4-20

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

FILE9 Cledc ot the Supedor Co 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA DEC -520 Ir 2 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO By j 0 ~EPUTYCTWK - 3

4 Tn re Complex Litigation Standing Order No. 2015-O01-CV

AMENDED STANDING ORDER FOR
6 ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF
DOCUMENTS IN COMPLEX
7 LITIGATION

8 ________________________________________________________

9 A. FINDINGS

10 The court finds that entry of a standing. order requiring mandatory electronic service

11 of all pleadings and documents in all cases that it identifies as “complex” per California

12 Rules of Court, rule 3.403 will benefit the court, attorneys, and litigants, and will further the

13 orderly conduct and management of complex litigation in this jurisdiction. The court further

14 finds that electronic service will not cause undue hardship or significant prejudice to any

15 party.

16 B. ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS

17 1. Effective January 1, 2015, the court orders that all documents shall be s.Qycl,

18 electronically as set forth in this order and in California Rules of Court, rule 2.251. This

19 standing order shall a~ply to all cases pending on January 1, 2015, and to all cases filed on

20 or after January 1, 2015. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, this order does not apply to

21 any documents filed or sewed prior to January 1,2015.

22 2. Original documents must be filed with the court as required by the Code of

23 Civil Procedure, the California Rules of Court, or the local rules of the Superior Court of

24 California, County of Solano. Nothing in this standing order shall be construed to require or

25 permit electronic filing of documents with the court.

AJ~4LENDED Standing Order 2015-OO1-CV

Page 1 of8

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 4-21 July 2017

1 3. Per California Rules of Court, rule 2.253(b)(1)(F), this standing order shall

2 apply only to cases designated as complex per California Rules of Court, rules 3.400

3 through 3.403.

4 4. This standing order shall apply to all attorneys in a complex matter. This

5 standing order shall apply to self-represented litigants only if they elect to participate in

6 electronic service. Unrepresented litigants who do not elect to participate in electronic

7 service shall s&ve and shall be sewed documents in the manner required by the Code of

8 Civil Procedure, the California Rules of Court, and/or the local rules of the Superior Court

9 of California, County of Solano.

10 5. The following documents shall not be served electronically:

11 a. Documents filed under seal or subject to a pending motion to seal, uhless

12 electronic service is permitted or required by specific court order.

13 b. Documents directed to an unrepresented party who has not elected to

14 participate in electronic service.

15 c. A summons, complaint, or crosè-complaint.

16 6. The documents enumerated in (B)(5), supra, shall be served pursuant to the

17 applicable provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, California Rules of Court, and/or the

18 local rules of the Superior Court of California, County of Solano.

19 C. DEFINITIONS

20 1. The definitions in California Rules of Court, rule 2.250(b) shall apply to this

21 standing order.

22 2. The term “plaintiff’ includes a cross-complainant or an intervenor.

23 3. The term “initial complaint” includes a cross-complaint or a complaint in

24 intervention.

25

AMENDED Standing Order 2015-OO1-CV www.solano.courts.ca.gov 4-22 July 2017

1 4. The term “amended complaint” includes an amended cross-complaint or an

2 amended cohiplaint in intervention.

3 D. DESIGNATION OF ELECTRONIC SERVICE PROVIDER

4 1. The court designates File & ServeXpress as the electronic service provider (“the

5 ESP”). File & ServeXpress shall serve as the ESP absent notice by the court that the ESP has

6 been changed or flirther court order. File & ServeXpress may be contacted by visiting

7 http://www.fileandservexpress.com or by calling 888-529-7587.

8 E. NOTICE OF STANDING ORDER

9 I. If a plaintiff designates the case as complex on the initial complaint, a copy of

~l0 this standing order shall be served on all defendants concurrently with the summons and

II complaint. If a plaintiff does not designate the case as complex on the initial complaint but

12 designates it as complex on an amended complaint, a copy of this standing order shall be

13 served on all defendants concurrently with the amended complaint.

14 2. If a defendant designates the case as complex on the initial answer, a copy of

15 this standing order shall be sewed on all plaintiffs concurrently with the answer. If a defendant

16 does not designate the case as complex on the initial answer but designates it as complex on an

17 amended answer, a copy of this standing order shall be served on all plaintiffs concurrently

18 with the amended answer.

19 3. If neither party designates the case as complex but the court determines the case

20 is complex per California Rules of Court, nile 3.403(b), the plaintiff shall serve a copy of this

21 standing order on all defendants within 5 calendar days of being notified by the court of the

22 complex designation.

23 4. Any party that joins a new party into this action shall serve a copy of this

24 standing order on the new party at the time of initial service.

25

AMENDED Standing Order 2015-OO1-CV www.solano.courts.ca.gov 4-23 July 2017

1 F. REGISTRATION WITH ELECTRONIC SERVICE PROVIDER

2 Upon the court designating a civil action as complex per California Rules of Court,

3 rules 3.402 and 3.403, the following registration procedures shall apply:

4 1. Within 15 days of the court’s designation of the case as complex, the

5 plaintiffs attorney, or the plaintiff if self-represented, shall submit to the ESP and to the

6 court a complete and current list of the parties, party types, and counsel representing each

7 party. The list shall include the names of any lead and other associated attorneys, together

8 with addresses, telephone and facsimile numbers, and e-mail addresses. All lists shall be

9 sent to the following e-mail address: esewice(~fileandservexpress.com. The ES? shall

10 promptly notify all Registered Users of any changes to this e-mail address.

II 2. If an unrepresented party affirmatively consents to electronic service, the

12 plaintiff’s attorney, or the plaintiff if self-represented, shall submit to the ES? and to the

13 court the unrepresented party’s address, telephone number, facsimile number, and e-mail

14 address in the same manner and within the same time limits as for attorneys.

15 3. All attorneys, and any unrepresented parties who consent to electronic

16 service, shall register with the ESP in the manner designated by the ESP.

17 4. Each attorney and unrepresented party registered with the ESP shall keep his or

18 her service information cuff ent and accurate with the ESP, all other attorneys and

19 unrepresented parties, and the court.

20 5. Each attorney and unrepresented party registered with the ES? shall be referred

21 to in this order as a “Registered User.”

22 G. ESTABLISHMENT AND STRUCTURE OF COMPLEX LITIGATION

23 WEBSITE

24 1. For each complex litigation case subject to this standing order, the ESP shall

25 establish and maintain an Internet website (“the Website”). The ES? shall post to the Website

AMENDED Standing Order 2015-OO1-CV www.solano.courts.ca.gov 4-24 July 2017

1 all documents submitted to the ESP by any Registered User and shall serve each document

2 pursuant to the service list provided to the ESP in accordance with the procedures herein.

3 2. Access to the Website will be limited to Registered Users and authorized court

4 personnel. The ESP will provide each Registered User and authorized court personnel with a

5 user name and password to access the Website and the documents served in this action. The

6 ESP personnel will perfonn all administrative fimctions for the Website, but all initial data,

7 additions, deletions or changes to the service list must be submitted by the attorneys and/or

8 parties.

9 3. All documents posted on the Website will be identified by: (1) the name of the

10 serving party or attorney; (2) the caption(s) of the case(s) to which the document belongs; (3)

11 the title of the document set forth on its caption; and (4) the identity of the party on whose

12 behalf the document is being served.

13 4. The Website shall contain an index of all served documents for the litigation

14 that will be searchable and sortable according to methods that provide useflil access to the

15 documents.

16 H. CONTENT AJil) FORMAT OF DOCUMENTS SERVED THROUGH THE ESP

17 1. The document shall be served to the ESP either as a word-processing file or as a

18 scanned image of the document. Each document shall be titled so as to identify the type and

19 purpose of such document and the identity of the attorney or party who is serving such

20 document.

21 2. Every pleading, document and instrument served electronically shall bear a

22 facsimile or typographical signature of at least one of the serving attorneys and/or parties,

23 along with the typed name, address, telephone number and State Bar of California number,

24 where applicable, of such attorney or party. Typographical signatures shall be treated exactly

25 as personal signatures for purposes of electronically served documents under the Code of Civil

AMENDED Standing Order 2015-OO1-CV www.solano.courts.ca.gov 4-25 July 2017

1 Procedure. The attorney and/or party serving any docmnent requiring multiple signatures (e.g.,

2 stipulations, joint status reports) must list thereon all the names of other signatories by means

3 of a “s/” block for each. By submitting such a document, the serving party certifies that

4 each of the other signatories has expressly agreed to the form and substance of the document

5 and that the sewing attorney or party has the actual authority to submit the document

6 electronically. The serving attorney or party must maintain any records evidencing this

7 occurrence for subsequent production to the court if so ordered or for inspection upon request

8 by any party.

9 3. A Registered User’s service of any document through the ESP shall be deemed

10 to include an implied warranty that to the best of the Registered User’s knowledge, the

11 transmitted document does not contain maiware.

12 I. PROCEDURE FOR SERVICE THROUGH THE ESP

13 1. A document shall be sewed through electronic transmission to the ESP over the

14 Internet.

15 2. After the ESP receives a document, the ESP shall convert such document into

16 Adobe Portable Document Format (“PDF”) and post it to the Website within one (1) hour of

17 receipt. -

18 3. Within one (1) hour of the time a document is posted to the Website, the ESP

19 will notify all Registered Users that a document has been posted to the Website. Registered

20 Users will also receive a courtesy e-mail notification of a filing with which they have been

21 served. The email shall contain a hyperlink to the document location(s) on the Website.

22 5. Each Registered User shall retain an original dated hard copy with hand written

23 signature of all documents served electronically by that Registered User. All such hard copies

24 shall be made available for inspection in the manner set forth in California Rules of Court,

25 rules 2.25 1(i) and 2.257(a).

AMENDED Standing Order 2015-OO1-CV www.solano.courts.ca.gov 4-26 July 2017

1 J. PROOFS OF SERVICE

2 1. Written proofs of electronic service shall conform to Code of Civil Procedure

3 section lOl3a and California Rules of Court, rule 2.251(i). The ESP’s transaction receipt may

4 operate as the proof of service so long as it complies with California Rules of Court, rule

5 2.251(i), and California Code of Civil Procedure section lOl3a.

6 3. A proof of service page may be attached to the last page of any electronically

7 served document. Neither a separate caption page nor a separate filing of the proof of service is

8 required so long as the proof of service page contains a caption referencing the case name and

9 action number, is attached as the last page of the electronically served document to which it

10 refers, and references the ESPs transaction receipt.

11 K. EFFECT OF ELECTRONIC SERVICE

12 1. Each document electronically served pursuant to this standing order shall be

13 presumed to have been served in compliance with the Code of Civil Procedure.

14 2. The effective date of service shall be governed by California Rules of Court,

15 rule 2.251(h).

16 L. TECHNICAL PROBLEMS AND ERRORS

17 1. If electronic service does not occur or is delayed because of (1) an error in

18 the transmission of the document to the ESP or served party which was unknown to the

19 sending party, (2) a failure to process the electronic document when received by the ES?,

20 (3) an erroneous exclusion from the service list, or (4) other technical problems experienced by

21 the ES?, the party or parties affected shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, be entitled to

22 an extension for any response or the period within which any right, duty, or other act must be

23 performed, provided the Registered User demonstrates that he or she attempted to file or

24 complete service on a particular day and time. -

25

AMENDED Standing Order 2015-OO1-CV www.solano.courts.ca.gov 4-27 July 2017

2. In the event the technical difficulties described above result in a Registered User

   2 being unable to comply with a statutory, court-ordered, or mutually-agreed deadline, the

   3 Registered User may obtain an ex parte court order granting an extension of time by following

   4 the standard ex parte procedure in the California Rules of Court and the court’s local rules.

   5 Provided the technical problem has been resolved and the Website is operating normally,

   6 notice of the ex parte application may be given through the ESP. In addition to the ex parte

   7 application, the Registered User shall file and serve a declaration which describes the

   8 attempt(s) made, provides the reason service did not occur or was delayed, states how and

   9 when the non-service or delay in service was discovered, details the person’s efforts made to

   10 rectify the situation, and states with specificity the extension of time sought.

   11 3. If the technical difficulties described above do not prevent a Registered User

   12 from meeting a statutory, court-ordered, or mutually-agreed deadline, the Registered User may

   13 file and serve a declaration which describes the attempt(s) made to serve the documents,

   14 provides the reason(s) service did not occur or was delayed, states how and when the non-

   15 service or delay in service was discovered, details the person’s efforts made to rectify the

   16 situation, and states with specificity the extension of time the party believes appropriate.

   17 M. ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF ORDERS AND OTHER PAPERS BY COURT

   18 The court may serve notices, orders, and other documents electronically subject to the

   19 provisions of this order.

   20 N. MODIFICATIONS TO STANDING ORDER

   21 The court may, on a party’s motion or on its own motion, order modifications to this

   22 standing order in a specific case.

   ordered. _

   Scott L. Kays

   25 Supervising Judge, Civil Division

   AMENDED Standing Order 2015-OO1-CV www.solano.courts.ca.gov 4-28 July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

PART ONE: Family Law Proceedings Generally

5.1 MATTERS ASSIGNED TO THE FAMILY LAW DIVISION; APPLICABILITY OF RULE

a. ASSIGNMENT OF MATTERS TO THE FAMILY LAW DIVISION
All family law matters will be heard principally in the Family Law Division as
designated by the Presiding Judge and in such additional departments to which such
matters may, from time to time, otherwise be assigned for trial or hearing by the
Supervising Judge of the Family Law Division.
(Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

b. MATTERS TO WHICH RULE 5 APPLIES
Rule 5 applies to all family law matters, including:
(1) Proceedings under the Family Code for dissolution of marriage or registered
domestic partnership, nullity of marriage or registered domestic partnership,
legal separation, custody and support of minor children, termination of
parental rights, adoptions, the Uniform Parentage Act, the Uniform Child
Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, or the Uniform Interstate
Family Support Act;
(2) Local child support agency actions under the Family Code; and,
(3) Contempt proceedings relating to family law or local child support agency
actions.

Requests for protective orders under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act are
governed by Rule 16, not Rule 5. However, ancillary issues (such as support,
custody, and temporary possession of property) raised in such a request are
governed by Rule 5.
(Subd (b) amended effective July 1, 2014; adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

c. APPLICABILITY OF RULES TO PARTIES AND COUNSEL
Unless otherwise prohibited by law, Rule 5 applies to the parties, to the attorneys
of represented parties, and to minor’s counsel. References to a party’s counsel or
attorney includes a self-represented party.
(Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

(Rule 5.1 amended effective July 1, 2014; adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5-1

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
PART ONE: Family Law Proceedings Generally a. ASSIGNMENT OF MATTER TO JUDICIAL OFFICER
When a family law case is filed, or received and filed as a transfer from another
jurisdiction, the Clerk of the Court shall assign the case to one judicial officer for
all purposes, as directed by and subject to the approval of the supervising judge of
the Family Law Division. The assignment shall be designed to fairly distribute the
workload among the judicial officers of the Family Law Division and best serve
the court.
(Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

b. NOTIFICATION OF ASSIGNED JUDICIAL OFFICER
The Clerk of the Court shall notify the parties of the initial assignment of the case
to a judicial officer at the time the petitioner’s initial pleading is filed.
(Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

c. NOTIFICATION OF REASSIGNMENT
Cases may be reassigned from time to time. Reassignments may be done on the
record at a hearing or by written notification from the court.
(Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

(Rule 5.2 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5.3 PREPARATION AND FILING OF FORMS AND PLEADINGS

a. USE OF SOLANO COUNTY COURT CASE NUMBER
The case number shall have the following format on all pleadings and forms filed
with the court:
(1) SF012345: All family law cases filed prior to December 8, 1999
(excepting adoptions and Uniform Parentage Act cases).
(2) FFL012345: All family law cases filed on or after December 8, 1999
or whose case number is equal to or higher than
FFL050994 (excepting adoptions and Uniform
Parentage Act cases).
(3) SA001234: All adoption cases filed prior to December 8, 1999.
(4) FAD001234: All adoption cases filed on or after December 8, 1999, or
whose case number is equal to or higher than
FAD005778.
(5) SL012345: All Uniform Parentage Act cases filed prior to December
8, 1999, including cases with case numbers formatted as

5-2

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
PART ONE: Family Law Proceedings Generally

“L012345”.
(6) FCS012345: All Uniform Parentage Act cases filed between
December 8, 1999, and September 30, 2002.
(7) FFL012345: All Uniform Parentage Act cases filed on or after
October 1, 2002, or whose case number is equal to or
higher than FFL069339.
(Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

b. APPLICATIONS FOR ORDERS FOR PUBLICATION OF SUMMONS
A petitioner seeking an order for publication of summons pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure section 415.50 may submit the request on either a local form made
available for that purpose or in a pleading that contains the same substantive
information required on the form.
(Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

c. FORMS AND DOCUMENTS TO BE INCLUDED WITH MOVING PAPERS
In addition to any forms required by the California Rules of Court, any Request for
Order or other moving papers served on the other party shall include a copy of the
court’s local form Meet and Confer Orders.

A party seeking to modify a prior order or judgment shall attach a copy of the prior
order or pertinent part of the prior judgment to his or her Request for Order. A
copy of the entire judgment need not be attached to the Request for Order. If
the Findings and Order After Hearing has not been filed, a copy of the minute order
shall be attached instead.

A party filing an Order to Show Cause and Affidavit for Contempt (Judicial Council
form FL-410) shall attach a copy of each order allegedly violated.
(Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

d. FILING OF NOTICES OF UNAVAILABILITY
The court shall not accept for filing a "Notice of Unavailability of Counsel" or other
document or pleading whose sole purpose is to advise the court and/or other

parties of an attorney's or party's unavailability. (Carl v. Superior Court of Orange
County (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 73.)
(Subd (d) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

(Rule 5.3 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5-3

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

PART ONE: Family Law Proceedings Generally

5.4 APPLICATIONS FOR EMERGENCY ORDERS (EX PARTE ORDERS)

a. APPLICABILITY
All parties shall comply with the provisions in Chapter 7 of Division 1 of Title 5 of
the California Rules of Court and with these local rules.
(Subd (a) amended effective July 1, 2014; adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

b. GENERAL STATEMENT REGARDING EMERGENCY ORDERS
Applications for emergency orders are appropriate only if needed to prevent an
immediate danger or irreparable harm to a party or to the children involved in the
matter, prevent immediate loss or damage to property subject to disposition in the
case, shorten time for hearing or service, or continue a hearing or trial.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2014; previous subd (b) relettered as subd (c)
effective January 1, 2014.)

c. PROCEDURES FOR REQUESTING EMERGENCY ORDERS
All parties shall comply with the following procedures:

(1) Requests for emergency orders will be considered every court day at
specific times set by each department. Those times will be available on the
court’s website at www.solano.courts.ca.gov or by telephoning the
individual department.

(2) The original Request for Order plus two copies and any other documents
required by statute or California Rules of Court plus two copies of each
document shall be submitted through the Family Law Division’s clerk’s
office. Unless the moving party has a valid fee waiver order on file or
submits a fee waiver concurrently with the Request for Order, the moving
party is required to pay all the applicable fees set by law at the time the
Request for Order is submitted to the Family Law Division’s clerk’s office.

(3) The emergency order hearing will be set on a date two court days after the
documents are submitted to the Family Law Division’s clerk’s office.

(4) Before the emergency order hearing, the moving party shall file a
declaration under penalty of perjury indicating whether or not notice of the
hearing was given in compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 5.165.
The moving party may satisfy this requirement by filing a completed
Declaration Re Notice Upon Application For Emergency Orders (Family
Law) (local form 5006-FL), a completed Judicial Council form approved

5-4

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

PART ONE: Family Law Proceedings Generally

for this purpose, or a declaration in compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 5.151(e)(2).

(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted effective January 1, 2013; previously amended July 1, 2014 and January 1, 2016.)

(Rule 5.4 amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted effective January 1, 2013, previously amended July 1, 2014 and January 1, 2016.)

5.5 LAW AND MOTION HEARINGS (HEARINGS OTHER THAN CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES, STATUS CONFERENCES, SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES, AND TRIALS)

a. SETTING AN INITIAL HEARING
When an initial hearing is set pursuant to a Request for Order or other paper seeking
relief, the matter shall be set on the assigned judicial officer’s law and motion
calendar. The clerk shall provide the time and date for all initial hearings. All
matters set on an initial hearing calendar are limited to 20 minutes of hearing time.
(Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

b. VACATING A SCHEDULED HEARING

(1) By the Moving Party
If the moving party’s Request for Order or other papers seeking relief have
not been served on the responding party, the moving party may take the
matter off calendar by giving notice to the court, which may be done by
telephone to the appropriate department. Notice does not need to be given
to the responding party.
If the pleadings have been served on the responding party but no responsive
pleadings have been filed, the moving party may take the matter off calendar
but must give notice to both the court and the responding party so as to avoid
unnecessary review by the court and appearances by the party. Notice to
the court may be given by telephone to the appropriate department.
(Subd (1) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

(2) By Stipulation
If responsive pleadings have been filed, the moving party may not take the
matter off calendar without written stipulation or written or oral
confirmation by the responding party. Confirmation may be by telephone
to the appropriate department.

5-5

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
PART ONE: Family Law Proceedings Generally

If both parties agree no hearing is needed, both parties shall so inform the
department to which a matter has been assigned as soon as practicable.

A failure to appear without prior notification to the court may result in the
imposition of sanctions against one or both parties and/or attorneys, in the
court’s discretion.
(Subd (2) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

(Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

c. REISSUANCE OF A REQUEST FOR ORDER
If the moving party did not serve the responding party before the date set for the
hearing, a new hearing date may be obtained from the calendar clerk and a Request
for Order may be reissued. The request to reissue the Request for Order must be
submitted to the court at least two court days before the scheduled hearing date;
otherwise, the party must appear at the hearing and request the reissuance in open
court.

If a moving party does not obtain a reissuance prior to the hearing and fails to appear
at the scheduled hearing to request a reissuance, the court may take the matter off
calendar.

If the moving party served the responding party but the service was untimely, the
moving party must attend the scheduled hearing. The responding party shall be
entitled to a continuance and the court may reissue the Request for Order. Any

temporary orders previously made may be extended upon a showing of good cause.
(Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

d. DAY OF HEARING PROCEDURES

(1) Duty to Appear and to Advise Court of Settled Issues and Remaining
Contested Issues
All parties and their attorneys shall be punctual for all court appearances
and shall check in with the courtroom clerk or bailiff upon arrival.

The parties or the attorneys for the parties shall be prepared to advise the
court as to what issues have been settled by agreement and what issues
remain contested.
(Subd (1) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5-6

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
PART ONE: Family Law Proceedings Generally

(2) Failure to Appear by Moving Party
If the moving party or attorney fails to appear when the matter is called, the
court may continue or remove the matter from the calendar at its discretion.
If the responding party appears, the court may award attorney fees and costs
to the appearing party if as a result of the moving party’s nonappearance
unnecessary fees are incurred.

If the responding party appears and has filed and served a responsive
pleading seeking appropriate affirmative relief, the court may continue the
matter or rule on the affirmative relief requested, at its discretion.
(Subd (2) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

(Subd (d) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

e. TELEPHONIC APPEARANCES
A party, an attorney, or a representative of a local child support agency or
government agency who wishes to appear by telephone at a hearing must file a
request with the court clerk at least 2 court days prior to the date of the hearing.
The request shall be made on a Request for Telephone Appearance (Judicial
Council form FL-679). The request must be served on all other parties, their
attorneys, and the local child support agency through a means calculated to ensure
delivery by the close of business on the next court day.

If the court permits the appearance by telephone, and unless the court specifically
directs otherwise, counsel or litigants wishing to appear by telephone shall refer to
the Court's website at www.solano.courts.ca.gov and follow the procedures as set
forth on the website. Counsel or litigants wishing to appear telephonically shall be
responsible for all fees and costs charged by the service provider.

Absent prior court order, requests for telephonic appearances in trials, contempt
hearings, orders of examination, and any other matters in which the person has been
subpoenaed to appear will not be permitted. Rules for ex parte requests and orders
shortening time shall apply.
(Subd (e) amended effective July 1, 2017; adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

(Rule 5.5 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5-7

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

PART ONE: Family Law Proceedings Generally

5.6 PRESENCE OF CHILDREN IN COURTROOM

Unless a child whose custody or visitation is at issue has been given court permission to address the court or testify per Family Code section 3042, that child shall not be present in the assigned courtroom while the matter is being heard, unless the judicial officer has specifically given permission for the child to be present.

In the event a party or minor’s counsel wants the child to be present, that party or minor’s counsel may disclose to the court that the child is in the courthouse and request that the child be permitted into the courtroom.

(Rule 5.6 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5.7 FAMILY CENTERED CASE RESOLUTION PROCESS (CRC 5.83)

a. APPLICABILITY
The Family Centered Case Resolution process (“the FCCR process”) shall apply to
dissolution, legal separation, nullity, and parentage cases filed on or after January
1, 2013. A judicial officer may, in his or her sole discretion, elect to place an
individual case other than a dissolution, legal separation, nullity, or parentage case
in the FCCR process.
(Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

b. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES
At the time a dissolution, nullity, legal separation, or parentage case is filed, the
case shall be automatically set for three case management conferences at six
months, twelve months, and eighteen months.

If a Request for Order is set for hearing at a point in time close to a scheduled case
management conference, the judicial officer may elect to conduct the case
management conference concurrently with the hearing on the Request for Order.

Nothing in this rule prohibits a party from requesting a status conference earlier
than a mandated case management conference. Nothing in this rule prohibits the
setting of status conferences in addition to the three mandated case management
conferences.
(Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5-8

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
PART ONE: Family Law Proceedings Generally

c. NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES
At the time the petition is filed, the court shall provide the petitioner with a Notice
of Case Management Conferences. This notice shall give the date, time, and place
that each party, or the party’s attorney if represented, shall appear for the three
required case management conferences.

A copy of the Notice of Case Management Conferences shall be served on the
respondent at the same time as the petition and summons.
(Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

(Rule 5.7 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5.8 STATUS CONFERENCES AND STATUS CONFERENCE REPORTS

a. APPLICABILITY OF RULE
Rule 5.8 applies only to status conferences. It does not apply to case management
conferences set per Rule 5.7.
(Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

b. PROCEDURE FOR SETTING A STATUS CONFERENCE
Status conferences may be used generally to assess the readiness of a case for
meaningful settlement conference and/or trial. No party shall obtain a settlement
conference or trial date except by court permission, which may be given at a status
conference. Status conferences may be utilized at the court’s discretion for any
other purpose deemed appropriate, such as for setting trial management
conferences.

In dissolution of marriage, nullity of marriage, or legal separation matters, a status
conference shall not be set at a party’s request unless that party has filed his or her
Declaration Regarding Service of Declaration of Disclosure and Income and
Expense Declaration (Judicial Council form FL-141) showing that the moving
party has complied with the disclosure requirements set forth in Family Code
section 2104. Status conferences may be requested by filing a local form
designated for that purpose, obtaining a date from the calendar clerk, and giving
notice to the opposing party or counsel. Notice shall be consistent with Code of
Civil Procedure section 1005 and proof of service of such notice shall be filed with
the court.

Compliance with disclosure requirements is not required in Uniform Parentage Act
cases or in proceedings to establish custody or support pursuant to Family Code

5-9

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
PART ONE: Family Law Proceedings Generally

section 3120. Thus, in cases brought per the Uniform Parentage Act or per Family
Code section 3120, a party may request a status conference by filing a local form
designated for that purpose, obtaining a date from the calendar clerk, and giving
notice to the opposing party or counsel. Notice shall be consistent with Code of
Civil Procedure section 1005 and proof of service of such notice shall be filed with
the court.

The court may set a case on the status conference calendar at its discretion. No
status conference may be continued or taken off calendar without court permission.
(Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

c. FILING AND SERVICE OF STATUS CONFERENCE REPORT
At least seven (7) calendar days before the scheduled status conference, each party
(or their counsel) shall file with the court and serve on all other parties a completed
status conference report on a local form designated for that purpose. The status
conference report shall be printed on light blue paper. Proof of service of the status
conference report shall be filed with the court at least seven (7) calendar days before
the scheduled status conference.
(Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

d. SANCTIONS
The court may impose sanctions if:
(1) A status conference report is not timely filed and served;
(2) A status conference report is not fully completed;
(3) A party or his or her attorney fails to appear at the status conference.
However, an attorney may appear on behalf of a party unless the court has
ordered a party to personally appear; or,
(4) An attorney or a party is not substantially aware of all procedural, factual,
and legal aspects of the case, or an attorney does not have full authority to
discuss and resolve any issues that arise at the conference, including, but
not limited to, resolving discovery and the setting of subsequent court dates.
(Subd (d) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

(Rule 5.8 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5-10

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

PART ONE: Family Law Proceedings Generally

5.9 COURT REPORTER FEES

The court will not provide court reporter services free of charge for hearings, evidentiary hearings, or trials. Unless the parties both waive a court reporter, each party shall be responsible for paying the applicable court reporter fees pursuant to Government Code section 68086 or the schedule approved by the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Solano. Fees are payable forthwith unless payment is specifically deferred until a later time by a judicial officer.

(Rule 5.9 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5-11

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
PART TWO: Settlement Conferences and Trials a. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES GENERALLY
Absent waiver for good cause shown, the court will require a mandatory settlement
conference prior to that matter proceeding to trial. Each party and the attorney who
will try the case for each party shall personally attend the settlement conference,
unless the court excuses the party prior to the conference or has granted permission
to appear telephonically.
(Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

b. DUTY TO MEET AND CONFER
The meet and confer requirements set forth in California Rules of Court, rule 5.98,
shall also apply to settlement conferences.

Counsel and parties shall comply at all times with the policy of the law to promote
settlement of litigation and, where possible, to reduce the costs of litigation by
encouraging cooperation between the parties and attorneys (see Family Code
section 271). Prior to the settlement conference, counsel and parties shall make
good faith efforts to settle all or some of the issues. They must also cooperate so
as to clearly outline and efficiently present the settled and unsettled issues to the
court at the settlement conference.
(Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

c. TIME FOR FILING AND SERVICE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
AND OTHER REQUIRED DOCUMENTS
Each party or attorney shall file and serve his or her settlement conference statement
and any other documents required by this rule or by court order at least fourteen
(14) calendar days prior to the settlement conference. Proof of service of the
settlement conference statement shall be filed with the court at least seven (7)
calendar days before the scheduled status conference.
(Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

d. CONTENTS OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
A settlement conference statement shall state in the caption the date and time of the
settlement conference.

Settlement conference statements submitted in an dissolution of marriage or
registered domestic partnership, nullity, or legal separation action shall respond to
each item set forth below. Settlement conference statements submitted in any other
matter shall respond to each item set forth below, except for items (4), (5), and (6).

5-12

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

PART TWO: Settlement Conferences and Trials

If a particular paragraph is not applicable, the statement shall indicate that fact.

(1) Statistical Facts (a) For Dissolutions, Nullities, and Legal Separations Only (i) The date of marriage or registration of registered domestic partnership, the date of separation, and the length of the marriage or registered domestic partnership in years and months; and, (ii) If the date of separation or any other statistical fact is contested, the party shall provide all material facts in support of their position. (b) For All Cases: (i) The names and ages of minor children and any disabled adult children to whom a duty of support may be owed; (ii) Ages of parties; (iii) Whether there are any contested issues as to statistical facts, and if so, a statement setting forth all material facts concerning the contested issue(s); and, (iv) The date service of process was completed, where it was made and how it was accomplished. (2) Child Custody and Visitation (a) A summary of the existing custody and visitation order or, if there is no existing order, the parties’ current practice; and, (b) The party’s proposal for custody and visitation. If the proposal is to change the existing custody or visitation order, the statement shall include all material facts in support of the proposal. (3) Child Support (a) A summary of the existing child support order or, if there is no existing order, the parties’ current practice; (b) All material facts in support of any unusual circumstances regarding income, expenses or ability to earn income; (c) A current calculation of the party's proposal for child support, pursuant to the relevant provisions of the Family Code, including a calculation of the percent of time share; and, (d) A statement whether or not either party receives public assistance or services from the Department of Child Support Services in the instant or related cases. (4) Spousal or Partner Support (For Dissolutions, Nullities, and Legal Separations Only) (a) A summary of existing spousal or partner support order or, if there

5-13

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

PART TWO: Settlement Conferences and Trials

is no existing order, the parties’ current practice; (b) All material facts in support of any unusual circumstances regarding income, expenses or ability to earn income; (c) The party’s proposal for spousal or partner support; and, (d) All relevant and material facts in support of the party’s position, including facts concerning each of the factors in Family Code section 4320 in the case of establishing or modifying post-judgment support. (5) Contested Property Issues (For Dissolutions, Nullities, and Legal Separations Only) Each party shall list each contested asset or obligation, real or personal, and for each asset or obligation, furnish the following information, if relevant to the contested issue: (a) The date it was acquired; (b) If the asset has a formal title (e.g. house, vehicle, bank account, brokerage account, etc.), the manner in which title is vested; (c) The party’s position as to the property’s character, e.g. as community property, separate property, or quasi-community or quasi-marital property; (d) All material facts and law in support of the party's characterization of the property; (e) The current fair market value of the property; (f) The nature, extent and terms of any encumbrance against the property and the current net equity in the property; (g) Whether the property has any community property interest through application of Moore/Marsden or Pereira/Van Camp, and if so, the factual and legal basis for apportionment, the formula for apportionment, and the value of each party's community and separate property interests; and, (h) A detailed and complete proposal for the disposition of each item of property. If the proposed disposition is not substantially equal, the statement shall include a proposal for equalizing the disposition. (6) Reimbursements and Credits (For Dissolutions, Nullities, and Legal Separations Only) (a) If a party is claiming Epstein credits, Watts/Jeffries credits, Family Code section 2640 reimbursements, or other claims for reimbursement or credits, the party shall include a complete statement setting forth the factual and legal basis for the credit or reimbursement claimed and the formula used (if any) to calculate the credit or reimbursement.

5-14

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
PART TWO: Settlement Conferences and Trials

(7) Attorney Fees, Expert Fees, and Costs
(a) Amounts paid by a party on account of his or her own attorney fees,
expert fees, and costs, and any balances due for such fees and costs;
(b) Amounts paid by a party on account of the other party's attorney
fees, expert fees, and costs, and any balances due for such fees and
costs; and,
(c) If a party is requesting that his or her attorney fees, expert witness
fees, or costs be paid in part or in full by the other party, state the
additional amounts requested and the legal and factual basis for the
request.
(8) Documents, Schedules, and Summaries
(a) If property is to be characterized and/or divided, attach copies of all
appraisals, expert reports, and other documentary evidence of an
asset’s value or amount of debt to be offered at the time of trial; and,
(b) List and describe all documents, schedules or summaries, and/or
other evidence to be offered at the time of trial. However, evidence
intended for use only for impeachment purposes is not required to
be listed.
(9) Witnesses and Reports
(a) Give the name, address and telephone number of each witness the
party plans to call at trial;
(b) Attach a copy of each document schedule, summary, expert report
or appraisal about which the witness will testify unless a copy is
attached elsewhere in the settlement conference statement; and,
(c) Provide a brief statement setting forth the substance of the
witnesses’ testimony.
(10) Points and Authorities
With respect to disputed matters, each party shall list the points and
authorities or legal arguments upon which that party intends to rely, so far
as is known at the time the statement is prepared.
(Subd (d) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

e. INCOME AND EXPENSE DECLARATION; TAX RETURNS
If child support, spousal support, attorney fees and costs, or sanctions are at issue
and unless a current Income and Expense Declaration (Judicial Council form FL-
150) is already on file, an updated Income and Expense Declaration shall be filed
concurrently with the party’s settlement conference statement. “Current” shall
have the same definition as California Rules of Court, rule 5.260(a)(3). Each party
shall also be prepared to provide the court with a complete copy of that party’s two
most recent federal personal tax returns. This shall include all schedules and

5-15

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
PART TWO: Settlement Conferences and Trials

attachments. If either party files a separate tax return for a business, a complete
copy of the two most recent federal tax returns for that business shall also be made
available. Except for Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TIN) or Social Security
Numbers, no information on any tax returns provided to the court may be redacted.
(Subd (e) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

f. TRIAL JUDGE AS SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE JUDGE
The settlement conference will be conducted by the trial judge. If any party objects
to the trial judge acting as the settlement conference judge, the objecting party must
do as follows:
(1) Orally object at the hearing if the party is present at the hearing at which the
settlement conference date is set; or,
(2) Object in writing if the party is not present at the hearing at which the
settlement conference date is set. The written objections must be filed no
later than ten (10) calendar days after receiving notice of the settlement
conference date.
(Subd (d) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

(Rule 5.10 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5.11 EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

a. MEET AND CONFER REQUIREMENTS
The meet and confer requirements set forth in California Rules of Court, rule 5.98,
shall also apply to all evidentiary hearings and trials.
(Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

b. VACATING OR CONTINUING AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING OR TRIAL DATE
An evidentiary hearing or trial may be vacated or continued only by court
permission obtained pursuant to stipulation by the parties, by order after a noticed
request, or upon the court’s own motion.

If the evidentiary hearing or trial is continued at a party’s request or by stipulation,
the current fee charged for such continuances shall be paid prior to or concurrently
with the filing of the order continuing the trial or evidentiary hearing.
(Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5-16

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
PART TWO: Settlement Conferences and Trials

c. DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
The parties shall bring to trial a sufficient number of copies of all evidence such
that a copy can be provided to all opposing parties and the court. Except for
evidence to be used solely for impeachment (e.g. to directly attack the credibility
of a party or witness), copies of all evidence shall be exchanged with all other
parties prior to the commencement of the trial.

So far as is practicable, all parties must have their respective exhibits (except those
to be used solely for impeachment) marked by the courtroom clerk before the time
scheduled for trial to start, unless excused by the assigned judicial officer.
(Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

(Rule 5.11 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5.12 – 5.19 [RESERVED]

5-17

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
PART THREE: Child Custody and Visitation a. PARTIES’ DUTIES
In all proceedings and actions where there is an initial contested issue regarding the
custody of or visitation with a minor child, the matter shall be set for child custody
recommending counseling through Family Court Services. The custody counseling
shall be completed and a report issued by the child custody recommending
counselor before the court hears the matter. Emergency hearings for temporary
orders pending the hearing are exempt from this rule.

If a party does not appear for the hearing and there is satisfactory proof in the court
file that the non-appearing party has notice of the hearing, the counseling session
may proceed without the party’s participation or may be excused in the court’s
discretion.
(Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

b. REPORT – FULL AGREEMENT
Where a full agreement has been reached in the counseling session between the
parties regarding the issues of custody and visitation, the child custody
recommending counselor shall prepare and forward to the court a written summary
of such agreement.
(Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

c. REPORT – PARTIAL OR NO AGREEMENT
Where there is not a full agreement between the parties regarding the issues of
custody and/or visitation, the child custody recommending counselor shall submit
a recommendation to the court regarding custody of and/or visitation with the minor
child(ren), per Family Code section 3183. The counselor’s recommendation shall
state the factual basis for the recommendation, which may include matters
communicated to the counselor by the parties or the minor child(ren). The court
may consider the written recommendation of the counselor and the basis for that
recommendation in determining the issues before the court at the time of hearing.
(Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

d. DISCLOSURE OF CHILD CUSTODY RECOMMENDING COUNSELING REPORT
PROHIBITED
Any written report or recommendation from a child custody recommending
counselor shall be confidential and unavailable to any person except the court, the
parties, their attorneys and the attorneys' employees or agents, the parties' experts,
licensed family counselors professionally involved with the case, the minor child’s

5-18

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
PART THREE: Child Custody and Visitation

attorney, and any person to whom the court expressly grants access by written order
made with prior notice to all parties.

Dissemination of the report to persons other than those identified above is strictly
prohibited.
(Subd (d) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

e. CALLING THE CHILD CUSTODY RECOMMENDING COUNSELOR AS A WITNESS
The child custody recommending counselor may be called as a witness by either
party, minor’s counsel, or the court, and may testify regarding his or her
recommendation and the basis therefore.

A party or attorney calling the counselor as a witness at any hearing must comply
with all statutory requirements for compelling a witness’ attendance at a hearing or
trial, including the payment of witness fees.
(Subd (e) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

f. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
The procedure for processing a complaint concerning a Family Court Services child
custody recommending counselor shall be as follows:
(1) Complaints are only accepted from the following individuals:
(a) A party to the action;
(b) A party’s attorney; or
(c) The court-appointed attorney for the minor child.
(2) The complainant must submit his or her complaint in writing with the Court
Services Program Manager for the Family Law Division.
(3) The written complaint must include the following information:
(a) The names of the parties in the case and their attorneys;
(b) The family law case number;
(c) The most recent court date and the date(s) on which the parties met
with the counselor;
(d) The name(s) of any Family Court Services personnel (i.e. child
custody recommending counselors) with whom the complainant had
contact; and,
(e) A statement explaining the reasons for the complaint. Mere
disagreement with a child custody recommending counselor’s
recommendation(s) or stated reasons for a recommendation is not a
sufficient basis for the court or any other program manager to take
action on the grievance, and such a complaint may be summarily
dismissed without further investigation or action.

5-19

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
PART THREE: Child Custody and Visitation

(4) Persons making complaints should be aware that all information contained
in the complaint will be made available to all parties and the counselor(s)
involved in the case.
(5) The program manager will conduct an investigation of the matter, which
will include consultation with the child custody recommending counselor.
The complainant will be informed in writing of the results of the program
manager’s investigation within 30 days of the submission of the complaint.
(6) Nothing precludes the complainant from bringing his or her concerns to the
court through a noticed motion.
(Subd (f) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

g. PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE AGAINST FAMILY COURT SERVICES CHILD
CUSTODY RECOMMENDING COUNSELOR
There shall be no “peremptory challenges” of the assigned Family Court Services
child custody recommending counselor.
(Subd (g) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

h. EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS WITH CHILD CUSTODY RECOMMENDING
COUNSELOR
Ex parte communication between any party or any attorney and the Family Court
Services child custody recommending counselor is prohibited, unless authorized by
the court or unless the child’s or a party’s physical safety is subject to imminent
risk of harm or danger.
(Subd (h) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

(Rule 5.20 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5.21 CHILD CUSTODY AND VISITATION EVALUATIONS

a. CONTACT WITH EVALUATOR IN CHILD CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS
All ex parte communications between court-appointed or court-connected
evaluators and parties or their attorneys are prohibited, except as provided by law
or court order. (A "court-connected evaluator" is a superior court employee or a
person under contract with a superior court who conducts child custody evaluations.
CRC 5.225(b)(7).) The court may order sanctions for violation of this no-contact
rule, which may include but not be limited to evidence or issue or monetary
sanctions, or suppression and sealing of the evaluator’s report and the conduct of a
new evaluation or investigation at the sole expense of the offending party.
(Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5-20

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
PART THREE: Child Custody and Visitation

b. SANCTIONS FOR UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO EVALUATOR’S REPORT
Disclosure of the report is governed by Family Code section 3111. If any person
entitled by law or court order to have access to the report discloses the report to
unauthorized individuals or the minor child, the court may impose sanctions against
that person.
(Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

c. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE – EVALUATORS
The procedure for processing a complaint concerning a court-appointed or court -
connected evaluator shall be as follows:
(1) If the complaint involves the cost or administration of the evaluation or
investigation process, then the complainant shall attempt to resolve the
matter with the evaluator before pursuing his or her complaint as provided
in this rule. All such attempts at resolution shall comply with court orders
and all applicable laws. All other complaints shall be made as presented in
subpart 3 of this rule, below.
(2) Except upon a showing of extraordinary circumstances, complaints about
the performance of an evaluator or investigator shall be addressed after
issuance of the evaluation or investigation report.
(3) Written notice of a complaint, specifying the conduct objected to, shall be
provided to the evaluator or investigator, the other party, and the attorney
for the minor child, and shall be lodged with the court by direct delivery to
the judicial officer, within 20 days after issuance of the evaluation report.
Mere disagreement with an evaluator’s or investigator’s recommendation(s)
or stated reasons is not a sufficient basis for the court or any program
manager to take action on the grievance, and such a complaint may be
summarily denied without further investigation.
(4) A written response from the evaluator or investigator (and from the other
party and/or the attorney for the minor child, at their respective election)
shall be provided to both parties and the attorney for the minor child, and
shall be lodged with the court, no later than 10 days after the complaint was
provided to the evaluator or investigator, the other party, the minor child’s
attorney, and the court.
(5) Within 10 days after receipt of the evaluator’s or investigator’s response, or
if there is no response from the evaluator or investigator, within 20 days
after receiving the original complaint, the court shall issue a written
statement as to what action, if any, it deems appropriate to deal with the
complaint.
(6) If either party or attorney for a minor is not satisfied with the court’s
determination, he or she may file a noticed motion requesting other

5-21

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
PART THREE: Child Custody and Visitation

specified relief. Such motion shall be in compliance with Code of Civil
Procedure section 1005 and shall be served on the other parties, the attorney
for the minor child, and the evaluator or investigator. The evaluator or
investigator shall appear at the hearing. The cost of the evaluator’s or
investigator’s appearance shall be advanced by the complainant, with the
court reserving jurisdiction over the allocation of such cost.
(Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

d. PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE AGAINST EVALUATOR
There shall be no “peremptory challenges” of the appointed evaluator.
(Subd (d) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

e. EVALUATOR’S PETITION FOR WITHDRAWAL FROM A CASE
A private evaluator shall have the right to petition for withdrawal from a case to
which he or she has been appointed. Such petition shall demonstrate good cause
for the withdrawal request. The petition shall be filed and served in compliance
with Code of Civil Procedure section 1005.
(Subd (e) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

(Rule 5.21 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5.22 – 5.29 [RESERVED]

5-22

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

PART FOUR: Support, Property Division, Attorney Fees, Costs, and Sanctions

5.30 CALCULATION OF TEMPORARY SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT

The court has adopted the Santa Clara guideline for temporary spousal or partner support.

(Rule 5.30 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5.31 – 5.39 [RESERVED]

5-23

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

PART FIVE: Judgments

5.40 CALENDARING HEARINGS FOR DEFAULT OR UNCONTESTED JUDGMENTS

Whenever permitted by law, parties are strongly encouraged to submit judgments by affidavit instead of requesting a hearing.

To obtain an uncontested or default judgment through a hearing, the requesting party shall submit a request for a hearing date in writing to the Family Law Clerk’s Office. That request will then be submitted to the assigned judicial officer for calendaring. If the request is granted, a notice of hearing will then be sent to the requesting party.

(Rule 5.40 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5.41 DOCUMENTS NEEDED FOR JUDGMENTS FOR LEGAL SEPARATION OR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE OR REGISTERED DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP

To obtain a judgment of dissolution or legal separation by declaration (without a hearing in court) pursuant to Family Code section 2336, the petitioner shall provide the forms listed in Judgment Checklist – Dissolution/Legal Separation (Judicial Council form FL-182) for the situation that pertains to that case (e.g. default without agreement, default with agreement, or uncontested). Documents that have already been filed do not need to be resubmitted.

To obtain a judgment of dissolution of marriage or registered domestic partnership or legal separation through a hearing, the requesting party must submit to the court at the time the hearing is requested the documents identified in Judgment Checklist – Dissolution/Legal Separation (Judicial Council form FL-182) for the situation that pertains to that case (e.g. default without agreement, default with agreement, or uncontested). Documents that have already been filed do not need to be resubmitted.

(Rule 5.41 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5.42 DOCUMENTS NEEDED FOR JUDGMENTS OF NULLITY

Judgments for nullity of marriage or registered domestic partnership must be set for hearing. They may not be requested by affidavit.

To obtain a judgment of nullity of marriage or registered domestic partnership, the requesting party must submit to the court the documents identified in Appendix 5-A for the situation that pertains to that case (e.g. default without agreement, default with agreement,

5-24

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

PART FIVE: Judgments

or uncontested). Documents that have already been filed do not need to be resubmitted.

(Rule 5.42 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5.43 DOCUMENTS NEEDED FOR DEFAULT OR UNCONTESTED JUDGMENTS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF PARENTAL RELATIONSHIP (UPA) OR FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF CUSTODY AND SUPPORT

To obtain a uncontested or default judgment that either establishes the existence or non - existence of a parental relationship or establishes custody and support per Family Code section 3120, the requesting party must submit to the court the documents identified in Appendix 5-B for the situation that pertains to that case (e.g. default without agreement, default with agreement, or uncontested). Documents that have already been filed do not need to be resubmitted.

(Rule 5.43 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

5-25

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

APPENDIX

5-A: DOCUMENTS NEEDED FOR JUDGMENTS OF NULLITY

A. DEFAULT WITH NO AGREEMENT (NO APPEARANCE AND NO AGREEMENT)

Unless already on file, the following documents shall be submitted to the court at the time the hearing is requested: Proof of Service of Summons (form FL-115) or other proof of service The petitioner’s Declaration regarding Service of Declaration of Disclosure and Income and Expense Declaration ( f 141) Request to Enter Default (form FL-165), with a stamped envelope addressed to the respondent and the court clerk's address as the return address If there are children of the relationship, submit the following: 1. The petitioner’s Declaration Under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) (form FL-105) If any financial relief is requested (e.g. child support, spousal/partner support, attorney fees), submit the following: The petitioner's current Income and Expense Declaration (form FL-150) OR Financial Statement (Simplified) (form FL-155) For attorney fees: A Request for Attorney Fees and Costs (form FL-319) or a comparable declaration that addresses the factors covered in the Request for Attorney Fees and Costs form, and, Either a Supporting Declaration for Attorney’s Fees and Costs Attachment (form FL-158) or a comparable declaration that addresses the factors covered in the Supporting Declaration for Attorney’s Fees and Costs Attachment form

The following documents shall be submitted to the court prior to or at the hearing: Judgment (form FL-180), to which is attached: 1. If child custody is requested: Child Custody and Visitation (Parenting Time) Order Attachment (form FL-341) OR other proposed written order containing the information required by Family Code 3048(a) 2. If child support is requested: Child Support Information and Order Attachment (form FL-342) Notice of Rights and Responsibilities and Information Sheet on Changing a Child Support Order (form FL-192) 3. If spousal or partner support is requested: Spousal, Partner, or Family Support Order Attachment (form FL-343) or other proposed written order 4. If attorney fees are requested: Attorney Fees and Costs Order Attachment (form FL-346) or other proposed written order 5. If property division is requested: Property Order Attachment to Judgment (form FL-345) or other proposed written order Notice of Entry of Judgment (form FL-190) 2 stamped envelopes large enough to return the Judgment and Notice of Entry of Judgment, with one envelope addressed to petitioner and the other to respondent.

5-26

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

APPENDIX

5-A: DOCUMENTS NEEDED FOR JUDGMENTS OF NULLITY

B. DEFAULT WITH AGREEMENT (NO RESPONSE AND A WRITTEN AGREEMENT)

Unless already on file, the following documents shall be submitted to the court at the time the hearing is requested: Proof of Service of Summons (form FL-115) or other proof of service Declaration regarding Service of Declaration of Disclosure and Income and Expense Declaration (form FL-141) from both the petitioner and respondent (each party must file a separate form) One of the following: 1. Declaration Regarding Service of Declaration of Disclosure and Income and Expense Declaration (form FL- 141) from both the petitioner and respondent (each party must file a separate form) 2. Stipulation and Waiver of Final Declaration of Disclosure (form FL-144) 3. Separately filed waiver or waiver included in a written agreement under Family Code section 2105(d) Request to Enter Default (form FL-165), with a stamped envelope addressed to the respondent and the court clerk's address as the return address If there are children of the relationship, submit the following: 1. The petitioner’s Declaration Under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) (form FL-105) If any financial relief is requested (e.g. child support, spousal/partner support, attorney fees), submit the following: 1. The petitioner's current Income and Expense Declaration (form FL-150) OR Financial Statement (Simplified) (form FL-155) 2. The respondent's current Income and Expense Declaration (form FL-150) OR Financial Statement (Simplified) (form FL-155) 3. For attorney fees: A Request for Attorney Fees and Costs (form FL-319) or a comparable declaration that addresses the factors covered in the Request for Attorney Fees and Costs form, and, A Supporting Declaration for Attorney’s Fees and Costs Attachment (form FL-158) or a comparable declaration that addresses the factors covered in the Supporting Declaration for Attorney’s Fees and Costs Attachment form

The following documents shall be submitted to the court prior to or at the hearing: Judgment (form FL-180), to which is attached: 1. If child custody is requested: Child Custody and Visitation (Parenting Time) Order Attachment (form FL-341) OR other proposed written order containing the information required by Family Code 3048(a) 2. If child support is requested: Child Support Information and Order Attachment (form FL-342) Notice of Rights and Responsibilities and Information Sheet on Changing a Child Support Order (form FL-192) 3. If spousal or partner support is requested: Spousal, Partner, or Family Support Order Attachment (form FL-343) or other proposed written order (continued on next page)

5-27

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
APPENDIX

5-A: DOCUMENTS NEEDED FOR JUDGMENTS OF NULLITY

4. If attorney fees are requested:
Attorney Fees and Costs Order Attachment (form FL-346) or other proposed written order
5. If property division is requested:
Property Order Attachment to Judgment (form FL-345) or other proposed written order
Notice of Entry of Judgment (form FL-190)
2 stamped envelopes large enough to return the Judgment and Notice of Entry of Judgment, with one envelope
addressed to petitioner and the other to respondent.

5-28

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

APPENDIX

5-A: DOCUMENTS NEEDED FOR JUDGMENTS OF NULLITY

C. UNCONTESTED CASE (APPEARANCE BY RESPONDENT AND A WRITTEN AGREEMENT)

Unless already on file, the following documents shall be submitted to the court at the time the hearing is requested: Proof of Service of Summons (form FL-115) or other proof of service Declaration regarding Service of Declaration of Disclosure and Income and Expense Declaration (form FL-141) from both the petitioner and respondent (each party must file a separate form) One of the following: 1. Declaration Regarding Service of Declaration of Disclosure and Income and Expense Declaration (form FL 141) from both the petitioner and respondent (each party must file a separate form) 2. Stipulation and Waiver of Final Declaration of Disclosure (form FL-144) 3. Separately filed waiver or waiver included in a written agreement under Family Code section 2105(d) Request to Enter Default (form FL-165), with a stamped envelope addressed to the respondent and the court clerk's address as the return address If there are children of the relationship, submit the following: 1. The petitioner’s Declaration Under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) (form FL-105) If any financial relief is requested (e.g. child support, spousal/partner support, attorney fees), submit the following: 1. The petitioner's current Income and Expense Declaration (form FL-150) OR Financial Statement (Simplified) (form FL-155) 2. The respondent's current Income and Expense Declaration (form FL-150) OR Financial Statement (Simplified) (form FL-155) 3. For attorney fees: A Request for Attorney Fees and Costs (form FL-319) or a comparable declaration that addresses the factors covered in the Request for Attorney Fees and Costs form, and, A Supporting Declaration for Attorney’s Fees and Costs Attachment (form FL-158) or a comparable declaration that addresses the factors covered in the Supporting Declaration for Attorney’s Fees and Costs Attachment form

The following documents shall be submitted to the court prior to or at the hearing: Judgment (form FL-180), to which is attached: 1. If child custody is requested: Child Custody and Visitation (Parenting Time) Order Attachment (form FL-341) OR other proposed written order containing the information required by Family Code 3048(a) 2. If child support is requested: Child Support Information and Order Attachment (form FL-342) Notice of Rights and Responsibilities and Information Sheet on Changing a Child Support Order (form FL-192) 3. If spousal or partner support is requested: Spousal, Partner, or Family Support Order Attachment (form FL-343) or other proposed written order (continued on next page)

5-29

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law
APPENDIX

5-A: DOCUMENTS NEEDED FOR JUDGMENTS OF NULLITY

4. If attorney fees are requested:
Attorney Fees and Costs Order Attachment (form FL-346) or other proposed written order
5. If property division is requested:
Property Order Attachment to Judgment (form FL-345) or other proposed written order
Notice of Entry of Judgment (form FL-190)
2 stamped envelopes large enough to return the Judgment and Notice of Entry of Judgment, with one envelope
addressed to petitioner and the other to respondent.

5-30

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

APPENDIX

5-B: DOCUMENTS NEEDED FOR DEFAULT OR UNCONTESTED JUDGMENTS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF

PARENTAL RELATIONSHIP (UPA) OR FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF CUSTODY AND SUPPORT PER FAMILY CODE §3120

A. DEFAULT WITH NO AGREEMENT (NO RESPONSE AND NO AGREEMENT)

Unless already on file, the following documents shall be submitted to the court at the time the hearing is requested or at the time the judgment by declaration is submitted: Proof of Service of Summons (form FL-115) or other proof of service Request to Enter Default (form FL-165), with a stamped envelope addressed to the respondent and the court clerk's address as the return address The petitioner’s Declaration Under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) (form FL-105) If proceeding without a hearing, submit a Declaration for Default or Uncontested Judgment (form FL-230), to which is attached: 1. The petitioner’s Advisement and Waiver of Rights Re: Establishment of Parental Relationship (form FL-235) 2. If attorney fees are requested: A Request for Attorney Fees and Costs (form FL-319) or a comparable declaration that addresses the factors covered in the Request for Attorney Fees and Costs form, and, Either a Supporting Declaration for Attorney’s Fees and Costs Attachment (form FL-158) or a comparable declaration that addresses the factors covered in the Supporting Declaration for Attorney’s Fees and Costs Attachment form If either child support or attorney fees are requested, submit the following: 1. The petitioner's current Income and Expense Declaration (form FL-150) OR Financial Statement (Simplified) (form FL-155)

The following documents shall be submitted to the court prior to or at the hearing or at the time the judgment by declaration is submitted: Judgment (form FL-250), to which is attached: 1. Child Custody and Visitation (Parenting Time) Order Attachment (form FL-341) OR other proposed written order containing the information required by Family Code 3048(a) 2. If child support is requested: Child Support Information and Order Attachment (form FL-342) Notice of Rights and Responsibilities and Information Sheet on Changing a Child Support Order (form FL-192) 3. If attorney fees are requested: Attorney Fees and Costs Order Attachment (form FL-346) or other proposed written order Notice of Entry of Judgment (form FL-190) 2 stamped envelopes large enough to return the Judgment and Notice of Entry of Judgment, with one envelope addressed to petitioner and the other to respondent.

5-31

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

APPENDIX

5-B: DOCUMENTS NEEDED FOR DEFAULT OR UNCONTESTED JUDGMENTS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF

PARENTAL RELATIONSHIP (UPA) OR FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF CUSTODY AND SUPPORT PER FAMILY CODE §3120

B. DEFAULT WITH AGREEMENT (NO RESPONSE AND A WRITTEN AGREEMENT)

Unless already on file, the following documents shall be submitted to the court at the time the hearing is requested or at the time the judgment by declaration is submitted: Proof of Service of Summons (form FL-115) or other proof of service Request to Enter Default (form FL-165), with a stamped envelope addressed to the respondent and the court clerk's address as the return address The petitioner’s Declaration Under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) (form FL-105) If proceeding without a hearing, submit a Declaration for Default or Uncontested Judgment (form FL-230), to which is attached: 1. The petitioner’s Advisement and Waiver of Rights Re: Establishment of Parental Relationship (form FL-235) 2. The respondent’s Advisement and Waiver of Rights Re: Establishment of Parental Relationship (form FL-235) 3. If attorney fees are requested: A Request for Attorney Fees and Costs (form FL-319) or a comparable declaration that addresses the factors covered in the Request for Attorney Fees and Costs form, and, Either a Supporting Declaration for Attorney’s Fees and Costs Attachment (form FL-158) or a comparable declaration that addresses the factors covered in the Supporting Declaration for Attorney’s Fees and Costs Attachment form If either child support or attorney fees are requested, submit the following: 1. The petitioner's current Income and Expense Declaration (form FL-150) OR Financial Statement (Simplified) (form FL-155)

The following documents shall be submitted to the court prior to or at the hearing or at the time the judgment by declaration is submitted: Judgment (form FL-250), to which is attached: 1. Child Custody and Visitation (Parenting Time) Order Attachment (form FL-341) OR other proposed written order containing the information required by Family Code 3048(a) 2. If child support is requested: Child Support Information and Order Attachment (form FL-342) Notice of Rights and Responsibilities and Information Sheet on Changing a Child Support Order (form FL-192) 3. If attorney fees are requested: Attorney Fees and Costs Order Attachment (form FL-346) or other proposed written order Notice of Entry of Judgment (form FL-190) 2 stamped envelopes large enough to return the Judgment and Notice of Entry of Judgment, with one envelope addressed to petitioner and the other to respondent.

5-32

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

APPENDIX

5-B: DOCUMENTS NEEDED FOR DEFAULT OR UNCONTESTED JUDGMENTS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF

PARENTAL RELATIONSHIP (UPA) OR FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF CUSTODY AND SUPPORT PER FAMILY CODE §3120

C. UNCONTESTED (APPEARANCE BY THE RESPONDENT AND A WRITTEN AGREEMENT)

Unless already on file, the following documents shall be submitted to the court at the time the hearing is requested or at the time the judgment by declaration is submitted: Proof of Service of Summons (form FL-115) or other proof of service Request to Enter Default (form FL-165), with a stamped envelope addressed to the respondent and the court clerk's address as the return address Declaration Under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) (form FL-105) from both the petitioner and respondent (a separate form must be filed by each party) Stipulation for Entry of Judgment Re: Establishment of Parental Relationship (form FL-240) If proceeding without a hearing, submit a Declaration for Default or Uncontested Judgment (form FL-230), to which is attached: 1. Advisement and Waiver of Rights Re: Establishment of Parental Relationship (form FL-235) from both the petitioner and the respondent (a separate form must be signed by each party) 2. If attorney fees are requested: A Request for Attorney Fees and Costs (form FL-319) or a comparable declaration that addresses the factors covered in the Request for Attorney Fees and Costs form, and, Either a Supporting Declaration for Attorney’s Fees and Costs Attachment (form FL-158) or a comparable declaration that addresses the factors covered in the Supporting Declaration for Attorney’s Fees and Costs Attachment form If either child support or attorney fees are requested, submit the following: 1. The petitioner's current Income and Expense Declaration (form FL-150) OR Financial Statement (Simplified) (form FL-155)

The following documents shall be submitted to the court prior to or at the hearing or at the time the judgment by declaration is submitted: Judgment (form FL-250), to which is attached: 1. Child Custody and Visitation (Parenting Time) Order Attachment (form FL-341) OR other proposed written order containing the information required by Family Code 3048(a) 2. If child support is requested: Child Support Information and Order Attachment (form FL-342) Notice of Rights and Responsibilities and Information Sheet on Changing a Child Support Order (form FL-192) 3. If attorney fees are requested: Attorney Fees and Costs Order Attachment (form FL-346) or other proposed written order Notice of Entry of Judgment (form FL-190) 2 stamped envelopes large enough to return the Judgment and Notice of Entry of Judgment, with one envelope addressed to petitioner and the other to respondent.

5-33

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 5 – Family Law

APPENDIX

Standing Order Title

2015-001-FL Standing Order Incorporating Solano County DCSS Additional Orders Into
All Solano County DCSS Judgments and Orders

5-34

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

FI LE D 1 :?-OL·H .. .. CO UR T 20 15 AUG II AH 8: 33 2

3

4

5 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

6 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO

7

8 In Re: All Matters Involving the Solano County Standing Order No. 2015-001-FL

9 Department of Child Support Services
STANDING ORDER
INCORPORATING SOLANO COUNTY 10
DCSS ADDITIONAL ORDERS INTO
11 ALL SOLANO COUNTY DCSS
JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS
12

13

14 TO ALL PARTIES IN MATTERS INVOLVING THE SOLANO COUNTY

15 DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES:

16 1. Whereas the Solano County Department of Child Support Services ("DCSS") has a set

17 of standard orders routinely included in its petitions, orders, and judgments;

18 2. Whereas recent changes to the formatting and method of filing of petitions, orders, and

19 judgments do not provide space for the inclusion of said standard orders; and,

20 3. Good cause exists to continue including such standard orders in future petitions, orders,

21 andjudgments ;

22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

23 1. Effective August 1, 2015, the Solano County Department of Chi ld Support Services

24 standard orders shall be incorporated by reference as orders of this court in all judgments and

25 orders made in proceedings where the So lano County Department of Child Support Services is

Standing Order 201 5-00 1-FL Page I of2

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 5-35 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 5-36 July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

PART ONE: Rules for Juvenile Court in General

6.1 ADOPTION, CONSTRUCTION AND AMENDMENT OF RULES AND STANDING ORDERS

a. APPLICABILITY OF RULES
Unless otherwise stated in a particular rule, Rule 6 shall apply to all matters heard
pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code sections 300, 601, or 602.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective August 1, 2002;
previously amended effective August 3, 2007, and July 1, 2008.)

b. STANDING ORDERS
The Presiding Judge of the Juvenile Division may issue such standing orders for
the administration of the Juvenile Court, as the court deems appropriate. The court
may issue new or amended standing orders by filing the same with the clerk of the
court and posting the order for a period of thirty (30) days outside of the juvenile
courtrooms and the clerk’s office.
(Subd (b) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as subdivision
(c) of Rule 6.1.1 effective August 1, 2002; previously amended effective July 1,
2008.)

(Rule 6.1 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 6.1.1
effective August 1, 2002; previously amended effective August 3, 2007, and July 1, 2008.)

6.2 ASSIGNMENT OF JUDICIAL OFFICER; JUVENILE CALENDAR

a. ASSIGNMENT OF JUDICIAL OFFICER FOR ALL PURPOSES
When a juvenile case is filed, or received and filed as a transfer from another
jurisdiction, the Clerk of the Court shall assign the case to one judicial officer for
all purposes, as directed by and subject to the approval of the Presiding Judge of
the Juvenile Division. The assignment shall be designed to fairly distribute the
workload among the judicial officers of the Juvenile Division and best serve the
court.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2012.)

b. JUVENILE CALENDAR
All juvenile matters will be heard by the Juvenile Court on such days and such
times as scheduled or approved by the Juvenile Presiding Judge.
(Subd (b) relettered effective July 1, 2012; adopted as unlettered portion of Rule
6.1.2 effective August 1, 2002; previously amended effective July 1, 2008; amended
and renumbered effective January 1, 2010.)

6-1

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

PART ONE: Rules for Juvenile Court in General

(Rule 6.2 amended effective July 1, 2012; adopted as Rule 6.1.2 effective August 1, 2002; previously amended effective July 1, 2008; amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010.)

6.3 ACCESS TO COURTROOM BY NON-PARTIES

Unless specifically permitted by statute, Juvenile Court proceedings are confidential and shall not be open to the general public. The court encourages interested persons including trainees and students to attend juvenile proceedings in order to better understand the workings of the Juvenile Court. The court retains the discretion to determine in each case whether any such interested party shall remain in the courtroom.

(Rule 6.3 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 6.1.3 effective August 1, 2002.)

6.4 CONFIDENTIALITY

All participants or permitted observers in Juvenile Court proceedings shall maintain the confidentiality of Juvenile Court documents and proceedings. Juvenile records may not be copied or disseminated outside of the juvenile proceedings without a court order. An intentional violation of these confidentiality provisions is a misdemeanor punishable by fine, imprisonment or both, and/or punishable as a contempt of court. [W&I § 827(b)(2)]

(Rule 6.4 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 6.1.4 effective August 1, 2002; previously amended effective July 1, 2008.)

6.5 RELEASE OF INFORMATION RELATING TO JUVENILES

a. DISCOVERY OF JUVENILE RECORDS
Except as indicated within this rule, in all cases in which a person or agency seeks
access to Juvenile Court records, including records maintained by the Juvenile
Court Clerk, the Probation Department, or the Health and Social Services
Department – Child Welfare Services Division, the person or agency shall file a
Petition for Disclosure (Judicial Council form JV-570) [W&I § 827(a)(2)(A)] with
the Presiding Judge or a judicial officer of the Juvenile Court. The petition shall
set forth with specificity the materials sought and the relevance of the materials to
the underlying action. The petition shall be supported by a declaration which
specifies the information or documents sought, the purpose for which the
documents or information is sought, the relevance of the documents or information

6-2

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

PART ONE: Rules for Juvenile Court in General

to the purpose for which they are sought, and, if necessary, a memorandum of points
and authorities. The Juvenile Court Clerk shall not accept facsimile copies of
Section 827 petitions for filing. This section does not apply to those persons and
agencies designated by Welfare and Institutions Code section 827(a) or any party
authorized to obtain records by a standing order issued by this court.
(Subd (a) amended and subd (1) through (3) deleted effective January 1, 2010;
adopted effective August 1, 2002; previously amended effective July 1, 2008.)

b. RELEASE OF RECORDS TO PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS
Any party, their attorney, or authorized agent in any Welfare and Institutions Code
§§300, 601 or 602 matter shall be given access to all records relating to the child
which are held by the Clerk of the Court unless otherwise specifically ordered by
the court. The party or counsel shall also have the right to secure copies of such
records. The party or counsel shall be responsible for the cost of any copying. Any
person requesting records shall complete the form adopted or approved by the court
for this purpose. A copy of the request shall be filed in the court file.
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted as subd (f) effective August
1, 2002; previously amended and relettered effective July 1, 2008.)

c. RELEASE OF COURT REPORTS TO COURT-APPROVED MENTAL HEALTH
EVALUATORS
Where the court has ordered a mental health or psychological evaluation of a minor,
the court approved evaluator shall be given access to the court’s file, unless the
court makes a specific order to the contrary in the referral.
(Subd (c) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2008; adopted as subd
(g) effective August 1, 2002.)

(Rule 6.5 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 6.1.5
effective August 1, 2002; previously amended effective July 1, 2008.)

6.6 DISCOVERY

a. INFORMAL DISCOVERY
Discovery shall be conducted informally. Except as protected by privilege, all
relevant material shall be disclosed in a timely fashion to all parties to the litigation.
(Subd (a) adopted effective August 1, 2002.)

6-3

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

PART ONE: Rules for Juvenile Court in General

b. FORMAL DISCOVERY
If all informal means of discovery have been exhausted, a party may petition the
court for discovery. Any noticed motion shall state the relevancy and materiality
of the information sought and the reasons why informal discovery was not adequate
to secure that information. The motion shall be served on all parties at least five
(5) court days before the hearing date. The date for the hearing shall be obtained
from the Juvenile Court clerk. A copy shall be served on the court before whom
the matter is scheduled to be heard. Any responsive papers shall be filed and served
in like manner two (2) court days prior to the hearing.
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective August 1, 2002.)

(Rule 6.6 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 6.1.7
effective August 1, 2002; renumbered as Rule 6.1.6 effective July 1, 2008.)

6.7 PETITIONS, PLEADINGS & MOTIONS

a. FORMAT OF PETITIONS, PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS
All petitions, pleadings and motions filed with the Juvenile Court must be in a
format approved by the court. All petitions, pleadings and motions must be
reviewed and signed by the attorney of record for the party where the party is
represented by counsel. Counsel are responsible for ensuring the legal sufficiency
of the document and compliance with procedural requirements.
(Subd (a) relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as unlettered portion of
Rule 6.1.8 effective August 1, 2002; former subd (a) repealed effective January 1,
2010.)

b. EX PARTE APPLICATIONS
All ex parte applications shall be in writing and the party making the applications
shall provide notice to all counsel at least one court day prior to the hearing.
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted as subd (e) effective August
1, 2002; amended and relettered effective July 1, 2008.)

c. NOTICES OF UNAVAILABILITY
The court shall not accept for filing a "Notice of Unavailability of Counsel" or other
document or pleading whose sole purpose is to advise the court and/or other parties
of an attorney's or party's unavailability. Carl v. Superior Court of Orange County
(2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 73.
(Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2009.)

6-4

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

PART ONE: Rules for Juvenile Court in General

(Rule 6.7 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 6.1.8 effective August 1, 2002; previously amended and renumbered as Rule 6.1.7 effective July 1, 2008; previously amended effective January 1, 2009.)

6.8 REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPTS BY NON-PARTY

Any non-party requesting a reporter’s transcript of a juvenile proceeding must file a Petition for Disclosure (Judicial Council form no. 570).

(Rule 6.8 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 6.1.11 effective August 1, 2002; previously renumbered as Rule 6.1.10 effective July 1, 2008.)

6.9 WELFARE AND INSTITUTIONS CODE SECTION 241.1 ASSESSMENTS

Any party requesting a Welfare and Institutions Code section 241.1 hearing may submit a written declaration providing specific facts supporting the party’s assertion that the minor comes within the description of a person subject to both Welfare & Institutions Code section 300 and either Section 601 or 602. The Probation Department and Child Welfare Services shall prepare an assessment report in accordance with the protocol established by Welfare and Institutions Code section 241.1, subdivision (b). The report shall provide the sources of the factual information upon which the recommendations of the respective departments are based.

(Rule 6.9 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 6.1.15 effective August 1, 2002; previously amended and renumbered as Rule 6.1.11 effective July 1, 2008.)

6.10 MOTION TO CHALLENGE LEGAL SUFFICIENCY OF PETITION

a. TIMING OF THE MOTION
A motion to challenge the legal sufficiency of the petition may be made orally or
in writing at the initial/detention hearing, or at the jurisdictional hearing. A party
may object on the ground that the petition alleges facts which, even if determined
to be true, either are not sufficient to state a cause of action, or are not stated with
sufficient clarity and precision to enable the party to determine what must be
defended against. The court may entertain the objection by oral argument when
made, or may set it for further hearing. No objection in the nature of a special
demurrer to particular allegation shall lie to challenge only certain paragraphs under

6-5

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

PART ONE: Rules for Juvenile Court in General

a particular subdivision of Welfare & Institutions Code section 300 (i.e. a party
must challenge all allegations under Section 300(b), not merely certain allegations.)
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2010; previously adopted as subd (a) of
Rule 6.2.5 effective August 1, 2002.)

b. HEARING ON MOTION; MEMORANDA OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
If the court sets a hearing on the objection, counsel for the objecting party may file
a supporting memorandum of points and authorities. To be considered timely, the
memorandum must be filed at least 48 hours before the hearing in the department
where the hearing is scheduled. The petitioner may file a memorandum of points
and authorities in opposition to the objection. To be considered timely, the
memorandum in opposition must be filed by 8:30 a.m. on the day of the hearing, in
the department where the matter is set for hearing. All memoranda of points and
authorities, whether in support of or in opposition to the objection, must be served
on all other counsel and the petitioner via facsimile or personal service.
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2010; previously adopted as subd (b) of
Rule 6.2.5 effective July 1, 2008.)

c. AMENDING THE PETITION
Petitioner may not amend the petition without leave of court once a written
objection to the sufficiency of the petition has been filed.
(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2010; previously adopted as subd (c) of
Rule 6.2.5 effective July 1, 2008.)

d. OBJECTION OVERRULED
If an objection to the sufficiency of a petition is overruled and no admission or
denial has been entered, the Court shall allow the admission or denial to be entered
at the conclusion of the hearing, or upon such terms as may be just.
(Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2010; previously adopted as subd (d) of
Rule 6.2.5 effective July 1, 2008.)

6-6

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

PART ONE: Rules for Juvenile Court in General

e. OBJECTION SUSTAINED
If the Court sustains the objection to the sufficiency of a petition, the Court may
grant leave to amend the petition upon any terms as may be just and shall fix the
time within which the amended petition shall be filed. During the time that the
petition is being amended, the minor may continue to be detained if the Court finds
that a prima facie case for detention exists.
(Subd (e) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted as unlettered portion of Rule
6.2.8 effective August 1, 2002; amended and relettered as Subd (e) effective July 1,
2008.)

(Rule 6.10 adopted effective January 1, 2010.)

6.11 – 6.29 [Reserved]

6-7

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

PART TWO: Juvenile Dependency a. MINIMUM STANDARDS OF COMPETENCE
All attorneys seeking appointment in juvenile dependency proceedings must meet
the minimum standards of competence set forth in California Rules of Court, rule
5.660(d).
(Subd (a) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 6.2.1 effective August 1, 2002.)

b. INITIAL APPLICATION TO PRACTICE IN THE JUVENILE COURT
An attorney seeking to practice before the Juvenile Court in dependency matters
shall submit an Application to Practice (Solano County Local Form no. 6000) to
the Presiding Judge of the Juvenile Court.
(Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2010.)

c. RENEWAL APPLICATION TO PRACTICE IN THE JUVENILE COURT
A Renewal Application to Practice (Solano County Local Form no. 6001) before
the Juvenile Court must be submitted to the court by January 30 in the year
immediately following the two (2) year anniversary of the submission of the
original Application to Practice. Those attorneys who submitted their original
application in January shall file their renewal application by January 30 of the
second year following the submission of the original Application to Practice. The
attorney shall attach to the renewal application evidence that he or she completed
at least eight (8) hours of continuing training or education directly related to
dependency proceedings since the last application. This evidence may include a
certificate of attendance at MCLE training, professional organization training
(along with a copy of the program schedule) and/or attendance at court-sponsored
or approved training.

Failure to supply proof of completion of continuing education or training by the
due date will cause the court to notify the attorney that his or her right to be
appointed in dependency proceedings will be revoked. The attorney shall have
thirty (30) days from mailing of notice to submit proof of completion of the required
education or training. If the attorney fails to submit such proof, the court will not
recommend further appointments until such time as the requisite proof is provided.
(Subd (a) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2008; adopted as subd (c)
effective August 1, 2002.)

6-8

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

PART TWO: Juvenile Dependency

(Rule 6.30 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 6.2.1 effective August 1, 2002; previously amended effective July 1, 2008.)

6.31 APPOINTMENT OF PRIVATE COUNSEL IN DEPENDENCY PROCEEDINGS

a. ELIGIBILITY FOR APPOINTMENT
The court will appoint only counsel who has submitted the application required by
these rules and have been certified by the court to represent parents or children in
the dependency court.
(Subd (a) amended effective July 1, 2008; adopted effective August 1,
2002)

b. NOTIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT
Notification of appointment may be communicated by phone call and confirmed by
appropriate written order or minute order.
(Subd (b) amended effective July 1, 2008; adopted effective August 1,
2002.)

c. COMPENSATION
Billing shall be forwarded to the court on appropriate forms with documentation
for approval.
(Subd (c) adopted effective August 1, 2002.)

(Rule 6.31 renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 6.2.2 effective August
1, 2002; previously amended effective July 1, 2008..)

6.32 PROCEDURES FOR REVIEWING AND RESOLVING COMPLAINTS REGARDING REPRESENTATION IN DEPENDENCY PROCEEDINGS

a. WHO MAY LODGE A COMPLAINT
Any party to a Juvenile Court dependency proceeding may lodge a written
complaint with the court concerning the performance of the party’s appointed
attorney in that proceeding. In the case of a complaint concerning the performance
of an attorney appointed to represent a minor, the complaint may be lodged either
by the minor or on the minor’s behalf by the social worker, a caretaker relative or
a foster parent.
(Subd (a) amended effective July 1, 2008; adopted effective August 1, 2002.)

6-9

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

PART TWO: Juvenile Dependency

b. PROCEDURE

(1) Upon receipt of a written complaint, the court shall notify the attorney in
question of the complaint, shall provide the attorney with a copy of the
complaint, and shall give the attorney fifteen days from the date of the
notice to respond to the complaint in writing.
(Subd (1) renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as portion of subd
(b) effective August 1, 2002.)

(2) After a response has been filed by the attorney or the time for the submission
of a response has passed, the court shall review the complaint and the
response, if any, to determine whether the attorney acted contrary to local
rules or policies or has acted incompetently. The court may ask the
complainant or the attorney for additional information prior to making a
determination on the complaint.
(Subd (2) renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as subd (c)
effective August 1, 2002.)

(3) If, after reviewing the complaint, the response, and any additional
information, the court, either in writing or at oral hearing, finds that the
attorney acted contrary to the rules or policies of the court or incompetently,
the court shall take appropriate action.
(Subd (3) renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as subd (d)
effective August 1, 2002.)

(4) The court shall notify the attorney and complaining party either in writing
or by oral ruling at a closed hearing of its determination of the complaint.
The court’s determination will be final.
(Subd (4) renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as subd (e)
effective August 1, 2002.)

(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective August 1, 2002.)

(Rule 6.32 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 6.2.4
effective August 1, 2002; amended and renumbered as Rule 6.2.3 effective July 1, 2008.)

6-10

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

PART TWO: Juvenile Dependency

6.33 PROCEDURES FOR INFORMING THE COURT OF THE INTERESTS OF A DEPENDENT CHILD [CRC 5.660]

a. NOTIFICATION TO THE COURT
At any time during the pendency of a dependency proceeding, any interested person
may notify the court that the minor who is the subject of the proceeding may have
an interest or right which needs to be protected or pursued in another judicial or
administrative forum. Notice to the court may be given by the filing of filing a
verified petition or notice of motion specifying the right or interest to be protected.
The person giving notice shall set forth the nature of the interests or right which
needs to be protected or pursued, the name and address, if known, of the
administrative agency or judicial forum in which the right or interest may be
affected and the nature or the proceedings being contemplated or conducted there.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective August 1, 2002.)

b. If the court determines that further action on behalf of the child is required, the
court shall do one or more of the following:

(1) Authorize the minor’s attorney to pursue the matter on the child’s behalf;

(2) Appoint an attorney for the child if the child is unrepresented;

(3) Notice a joinder hearing pursuant to Section 362(a) compelling the
responsible agency to report to the court with respect to whether it has
carried out its statutory duties with respect to the child;

(4) Appoint a guardian ad litem for the child for the purposes of initiating or
pursuing appropriate action in the other forum(s);

(5) Take any other action the court may deem necessary or appropriate to
protect the welfare, interests and rights of the child.
(Subd (b) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as subd (c)
effective August 1, 2002.)

(Rule 6.33 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 6.2.5
effective August 1, 2002; amended and renumbered as Rule 6.2.4 effective July 1, 2008.)

6-11

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

PART TWO: Juvenile Dependency a. TIMING OF MOTION
A motion to challenge the legal sufficiency of the petition may be made orally or
in writing at the initial/detention hearing, or at the jurisdictional hearing. A party
may object on the ground that the petition alleges facts which, even if determined
to be true, either are not sufficient to state a cause of action, or are not stated with
sufficient clarity and precision to enable the party to determine what must be
defended against. The court may entertain the objection by oral argument when
made, or may set it for further hearing. No objection in the nature of a special
demurrer to particular allegation shall lie to challenge only certain paragraphs under
a particular subdivision of Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 (i.e. a party
must challenge all allegations under Section §300(b), not merely certain
allegations.)
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective August 1, 2002;
previously amended effective July 1, 2008.)

b. MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
If the court sets a hearing on the objection, counsel for the moving party may file a
supporting memorandum of points and authorities. To be considered timely, the
memorandum must be filed at least 48 hours before the hearing in the department
where the hearing is scheduled. Petitioner may file a memorandum of points and
authorities in opposition to the objection. To be considered timely, the
memorandum in opposition must be filed by 9 a.m. on the day of the hearing, in the
department where the matter is set for hearing. All memoranda of points and
authorities, whether in support of or in opposition to the objection, must be served
on all other counsel and the petitioner via facsimile.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2008.)

c. AMENDING THE PETITION
Petitioner may not amend the petition without leave of court once a written
objection to the sufficiency of the petition has been filed.
(Subd (c) adopted effective July 1, 2008.)

d. OBJECTION TO SUFFICIENCY OF PETITION OVERRULED
If an objection to the sufficiency of a petition is overruled and no admission or
denial has been entered, the court shall allow the admission or denial to be entered
at the conclusion of the hearing, or upon such terms as may be just.
(Subd (d) adopted effective July 1, 2008.)

6-12

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

PART TWO: Juvenile Dependency

e. OBJECTION TO SUFFICIENCY OF PETITION SUSTAINED
If the court sustains the objection to the sufficiency of a petition, the court may
grant leave to amend the petition upon any terms as may be just and shall fix the
time within which the amended petition shall be filed. During the time that the
petition is being amended, the minor may continue to be detained if the court finds
that a prima facie case for detention exists.
(Subd (e) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2008; adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 6.2.8 effective August 1, 2002.)

(Rule 6.34 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 6.2.8
effective August 1, 2002; previously amended and renumbered as Rule 6.2.5 effective July
1, 2008.)

6.35 ACCESS TO MINORS

a. ACCESS TO MINORS PETITIONED PURSUANT TO W& I § 300
No party or attorney in a dependency proceeding shall interview the minor about
the events relating to the allegations in the petition(s) on file without permission of
the minor’s attorney or court order. No party or attorney in a dependency
proceeding shall cause the minor to undergo physical, medical or mental health
examination or evaluation without court approval. This rule does not apply to the
investigating social worker prior to the establishment of jurisdiction.
(Subd (a) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2008; adopted as subd (b)
effective August 1, 2002.)

b. INTERVIEWING MINORS WHO ARE ALLEGED VICTIMS OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE
In all dependency matters where there are allegations of child sexual abuse, all
participants and their counsel shall minimize the number of interviews they take of
the minor relating to the events surrounding the alleged abuse.
(Subd (b) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2008; adopted as Subd (c)
effective August 1, 2002.)

(Rule 6.35 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 6.2.10
effective August 1, 2002; previously amended and renumbered as Rule 6.2.6 effective July
1, 2008.)

6-13

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

PART TWO: Juvenile Dependency a. VACATIONS OUT OF SOLANO COUNTY
Permission for a dependent child’s custodian to take the child out of Solano County
for a vacation may be submitted directly to the Court for approval at least five court
days prior to departure. Any attempts to notify the parents and the parents’ position
on the request shall be indicated in the application.
(Subd (a) relettered effective July 1, 2008; adopted as Subd (e) effective August 1,
2002.)

b. NEW SERVICE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Any significant changes or additions to the service plan for parents or guardians
shall be submitted to them for approval before implementation. A parent or
guardian who disagrees with the new requirements may request a hearing with the
Court on the matter.
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Subd (f) effective August
1, 2002; relettered effective July 1, 2008.)

c. NOTICE RE CHANGE IN PLACEMENT
In order to ensure that proper notice is received by attorneys for parents and
children of any change in a child’s placement after the original dispositional
hearing:

(1) In non-emergency situations, the Department shall give notice at least three
(3) court days prior to the change in placement.

(2) Prior to removal of a child from one county to another, the Department shall
provide notice at least ten (10) court days unless emergency circumstances
prevent such notice. In emergency circumstances, the Department shall
give notice immediately and in no case later than 48 hours (two court days)
following the child’s change in placement. Notice may be given orally or
in writing.
(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted as portion of Rule 6.2.11
effective August 1, 2002; previously amended effective July 1, 2008.)

(Rule 6.36 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 6.2.11
effective August 1, 2002; amended and renumbered as Rule 6.2.7 effective July 1, 2008.)

6-14

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

PART TWO: Juvenile Dependency

6.37 COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE PROGRAM (CASA)

The court adopts by incorporation into these rules the requirements of Welfare and Institutions Code sections 100 et seq. and 356.5, California Rules of Court, rule 5.655, and the Judicial Council Court-Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) Grant Program Guidelines, which implement the requirements of these statutory provisions. Any grant funds received under the CASA Grant Program shall be administered in accordance with the CASA Grant Program Guidelines.

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 5.655(k)(5), CASA must submit its report to the Clerk of the Juvenile Court at least seven (7) days before each regularly scheduled review following the appointment of the CASA advocate. Copies of the report will be distributed by the Clerk of the Juvenile Court only to the parties or their attorneys of record when represented by counsel at least two (2) court days before the hearing for which the report was prepared. Relatives, de facto parents, foster parents, and service providers are not entitled to receive copies of the CASA reports absent further order of the juvenile court.

(Rule 6.37 amended effective July 1, 2012; adopted as Rule 6.2.13 effective August 1, 2002; previously renumbered as Rule 6.2.8 effective July 1, 2008; previously amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010.)

6.38 – 6.59 [Reserved]

6-15

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

PART THREE: Juvenile Delinquency

6.60 RETURN ON BENCH WARRANT

With a minimum of two court days notice to the Juvenile Court, the District Attorney and Probation, counsel for juveniles in Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 proceedings may schedule a return on warrant hearing. If the minor fails to appear at the Return on Bench Warrant hearing, counsel for the juvenile will need permission to re-calendar the matter from the Juvenile Court Judge or their designated staff.

(Rule 6.60 renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 6.1.9 effective July 1, 2008.)

6-16

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

APPENDIX

Standing Order Title

2002-01 Medical Authorization – Juvenile Hall

2002-05 Release of Records, Absent Parents

2002-07 Release of Records – Financial Hearing Officer

2011-001 Standing Order Authorizing Mental Health Evaluation and/or Treatment for Dependent Children or Minors Placed into Protective Custody by Child Welfare Services

2011-002 Order re: Release of Probation Files and Information Regarding Parents with Children Under the Jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court

2011-003 Standing Order to Facilitate Child Welfare Services Disaster Response Plan

2011-004 The Exchange of Information Pertaining to Juveniles Among Members of Multidisciplinary Teams

2011-005 Exchange and Release of Information Between Child Welfare Services and the Solano County Court Investigator

2011-006 Exchange & Release of Juvenile Records to be Used in the Solano Countywide Foster Youth Services Program (Education Code § 488850 et seq., Welfare & Institutions Code § 827, Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.552)

2011-007 Release of School Records to Solano County Probation and Solano County Health and Social Services, Child Welfare Services Division (Education Code § 49077)

2011-008 Toxicology Testing for Drug Exposed Children Subject to Juvenile Laws (Welfare & Institutions Code § 369, subd. (d))

2012-001 Standing Order Authorizing Medical Evaluation and Treatment for Minors Placed into Protective Custody and Temporarily Detained in Out-of - Placement by Child Welfare Services

2016-001-JV Release of Juvenile Case File Information for Welf. & Inst. C. §§ 601 and 602 Proceedings (Welf. & Inst. C. § 827; T.N.G. v Superior Court (1971) 4 Cal.3d 767; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.552)

6-17

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 6 – Juvenile Proceedings

APPENDIX

Standing Order Title

2016-002-JV Designation of Chief Probation Officer/Designee as Representative of Court for Purposes of Referring Students to the Community School Programs (Welf. & Inst. C. § 654(c), Educ. C. § 42238.18(b))

6-18

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-19 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-20 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-21 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-22 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-23 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-24 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-25 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-26 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-27 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-28 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-29 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-30 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-31 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-32 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-33 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-34 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-35 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-36 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-37 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-38 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-39 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-40 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-41 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-42 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-43 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-44 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-45 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-46 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-47 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-48 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-49 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-50 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-51 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-52 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-53 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-54 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-55 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-56 July 2017

www.solano.courts.ca.gov 6-57 July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART ONE: Probate Proceedings Generally

7.1 SCOPE OF PROBATE RULES; DIRECT CALENDARING

a. MATTERS TO WHICH RULE 7 APPLIES
Except as otherwise provided elsewhere in these rules, these probate rules apply to
all matters governed by the Probate Code, except probate guardianships and probate
conservatorships, which are governed by Rule 15.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. DIRECT CALENDARING
When a probate case is filed, or received and filed as a transfer from another county,
the Clerk of the Court shall assign the case in a manner directed by the Supervising
Judge of the Civil Division. The assignment to a judge shall be deemed to be for
all purposes. The method of selection of the judge to be assigned to a case shall be
designed to equally distribute the workload among the judges and best serve the
court.
(Subd. (b) adopted effective January 1, 2012; former subd (b) repealed effective
January 1, 2012.)

(Rule 7.1 amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective July 1, 2009; previously
amended effective January 1, 2010.)

7.2 USE OF JUDICIAL COUNCIL FORMS; FORMAT OF PLEADINGS; CALENDARING

a. USE OF JUDICIAL COUNCIL FORMS
Printed forms of petitions, orders and other documents which have been adopted or
approved by the Judicial Council shall be used in all cases where applicable.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009; previously adopted as unlettered portion
of Rule 7.1 effective July 1, 1988.)

b. FORMAT OF PLEADINGS
Petitions, orders and other documents for which there is no available form approved
by the Judicial Council shall conform to the requirements of the California Rules
of Court, rules 2.100-2.119.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009; previously adopted as unlettered portion
of Rule 7.1 effective July 1, 1988.)

7-1

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART ONE: Probate Proceedings Generally

c. NOTICES OF UNAVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL
The court shall not accept for filing a "Notice of Unavailability of Counsel" or other
document or pleading whose sole purpose is to advise the court and/or other parties
of an attorney's or party's unavailability. (Carl v. Superior Court of Orange County
(2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 73.)
(Subd (c) adopted effective July 1, 2009; previously adopted as unlettered portion
of Rule 7.1 effective July 1, 1988.)

d. CALENDARING PETITIONS
Parties may contact the Probate Division calendaring clerk to reserve a hearing date
on a probate petition. Reservation of a calendar date does not automatically place
the matter on the court’s calendar. The probate petition must be filed within three
court days of reserving the date, otherwise the date reserved will be canceled.
Except for petitions brought ex parte, probate petitions shall not be calendared for
hearing until the moving party files a Notice of Hearing.
(Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective July 1, 2010.)

e. FILING PETITIONS
All petitions concerning trusts shall be filed at least 30 days prior to the desired or
scheduled hearing date. All petitions concerning non-trust probate matters shall be
filed at least 15 days prior to the desired or scheduled hearing date.
(Subd. (e) adopted effective January 1, 2012.)

(Rule 7.2 amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted as Rule 7.1 effective July 1, 1988;
previously amended effective January 1, 2009; previously amended and renumbered
effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1, 2010.)

7.3 SIGNATURES AND VERIFICATION OF PLEADINGS

Petitions, reports and accounts, as well as objections or responses to petitions, reports and
accounts, shall be verified as required by Probate Code section 1020 et seq. The
verification shall be included as part of the pleading at the time the pleading is filed. An
unverified pleading set for hearing will be placed off-calendar or denied without prejudice.

(Rule 7.3 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.2 effective
July 1, 1988; previously amended effective July 1, 1989.)

7-2

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART ONE: Probate Proceedings Generally a. INCREASES IN BONDS
When a bond must be increased, the court will ordinarily require the filing of an
additional bond rather than a substitute bond.

b. DECREASES IN BONDS
When the bond may be decreased, the court will ordinarily require an order
decreasing the liability on the existing bond rather than the filing of a substitute
bond. All petitions for reduction of bond must be filed and set for a noticed hearing.
A petition to reduce bond shall not be granted ex parte.

(Rule 7.4 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.6 effective
July 1, 1988; previously amended effective July 1, 1989.)

7.5 DECLINATION OF NOMINATED EXECUTOR

If the person petitioning for letters is not the nominated executor in the decedent’s will, it is insufficient to allege merely that the nominated executor declines to act as such. The petitioner must either (1) attach to the petition a written declination to act as executor, signed by the nominated executor, or (2) include in the petition sufficient facts demonstrating that the nominated executor should be held to have waived his or her right to appointment per Probate Code section 8001. Any such nominated executor must receive notice of the petition per Probate Code section 8110.

(Rule 7.5 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.7 effective July 1, 1988.)

7.6 NOTICES

Several Probate Code sections require the Clerk of the Court to "cause notice of the hearing to be mailed." The Clerk fulfills this function by requiring a party or a party’s counsel to do the mailing. Therefore, the party or the party’s counsel is charged with this duty.

(Rule 7.6 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.10 effective July 1, 1988; previously amended effective July 1, 1989.)

7-3

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART ONE: Probate Proceedings Generally a. PROCEDURE TO OBTAIN CONTINUANCE
No matter shall be continued unless the department of the court to which the matter
is assigned approves of the continuance date.

If the proposed continuance is by stipulation, the stipulation shall be submitted to
the court for review and approval of the proposed continuance date. If the proposed
continuance date is approved, an amended Notice of Hearing (Judicial Council
form DE-120) with the new hearing date may thereafter be submitted for filing. A
copy of the stipulation shall be submitted to the calendar clerk concurrently with
the amended Notice of Hearing, along with all appropriate filing fees.

If the proposed continuance is not by stipulation, the continuance shall be requested
either through a notice of motion or through the ex parte process as set forth in local
rule 7.10. If the proposed continuance date is approved, an amended Notice of
Hearing (Judicial Council form DE-120) with the new hearing date may thereafter
be submitted for filing. A copy of the court’s order granting the continuance shall
be submitted to the calendar clerk concurrently with the amended Notice of
Hearing, along with all appropriate filing fees.

Unless the continuance was ordered by the court on its own motion, a Notice of
Hearing is not sufficient, in and of itself, to cause the recalendaring of a hearing.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. CONTINUANCE OF HEARING AFTER ANNOUNCEMENT OF PREGRANT ORDER
No probate matters will be continued after announcement of a pregrant thereon,
except by order of the court for good cause.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 7.7 amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

7-4

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART ONE: Probate Proceedings Generally

7.8 PROBATE NOTES AND PREGRANTS IN PROBATE MATTERS

Probate notes on selected probate matters will be available approximately one week prior to the scheduled hearing date. The availability of probate notes may fluctuate depending on the court’s calendars and staffing availability. Probate notes are available by signing onto the court’s web site at www.solano.courts.ca.gov and selecting the link for “Probate Notes and Pre-grants” (next to “Tentative Rulings”).

Pregrant orders are the court’s tentative rulings on decedent estates, trusts, and miscellaneous probate petitions. Pregrant orders are not posted for conservatorship or guardianship matters. A pregrant order on a probate matter will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the scheduled hearing by signing onto the court’s web site at 2Hwww.solano.courts.ca.gov and selecting the link for “Probate Notes and Pre - grants” (next to “Tentative Rulings”) or by telephoning the court at (707) 207-7331.

(Rule 7.8 amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted effective July 1, 2009; previously amended effective January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2012.)

7.9 APPEARANCES AT HEARINGS

a. HEARINGS WHERE APPEARANCE NOT REQUIRED
Those matters which by law may be determined upon verification and without
testimony shall be submitted for appropriate action by the court without appearance
by counsel or witnesses, provided that counsel or the petitioning party accomplish
both of the following:
(1) All declarations, affidavits, consents, waivers, proposed orders and other
necessary papers shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court no later than four
full court days prior to the hearing.
(2) The verified petition or an accompanying affidavit signed by the petitioner
or by the personal representative or by counsel of record for either of said
persons shall set forth the information necessary to establish the amount of
bond, if one is required.

All probate matters shall be non-appearance except as stated in Solano County
Local Rules, rule 7.9, subdivision (b), or where an appearance is required by the
court.
(Subd (a) amended effective July 1, 2009; adopted effective July 1, 1989; previously
amended effective January 1, 2009.)

7-5

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART ONE: Probate Proceedings Generally

b. HEARINGS WHERE APPEARANCE IS REQUIRED
Subdivision (a) shall not apply and personal appearance by the parties and/or
counsel shall be required in the following cases:
(1) Contested matters.
(2) Proof of holographic wills, if the petitioner did not previously submit proof
of the admissibility of each testamentary document to probate or if an
appearance is specially required by the hearing judge.
(3) Petitions for court confirmation of sales of property.
(4) Any non-routine matter which by law requires the personal appearance of
any person.
(Subd (b) amended effective July 1,2009; adopted effective July 1, 1989; previously
amended effective January 1, 2009.)

c. TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE
Telephonic appearance will be permitted when authorized by California Rule of
Court, rule 3.670 and Solano County Local Rules, rule 4.12(h), if the party seeking
to appear telephonically has also complied with the notice requirements set forth in
those rules, and subject to the exceptions set forth in those rules and the court's
discretion to require personal appearances.
(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2010; amended and relettered effective July
1, 2009; adopted as subd (d) of Rule 7.11 effective July 1, 1989; previously
amended effective January 1, 2009.)

(Rule 7.9 amended effective January 1, 2010; amended and renumbered effective July 1,
2009; adopted as Rule 7.11 effective July 1, 1989.)

7.10 EX PARTE APPLICATIONS

a. NOTICE ON EX PARTE PETITIONS

(1) Unless otherwise ordered by the court, a party seeking ex parte relief shall
provide notice of the petition to all individuals entitled to notice of a petition
by 10:00 a.m. on the court day prior to the ex parte appearance.

(2) All applications for ex parte orders must contain a statement on special
notices. The statement shall recite that no request for special notice is on
file and in effect or shall list the parties requesting special notice and have
attached to the petition the specific waivers of notice by such parties or
proof of service on parties requesting special notice.

7-6

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART ONE: Probate Proceedings Generally

(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009; previously adopted as subd (c) of former
Rule 7.11 effective July 1, 1989.)

b. WAIVER OF NOTICE
A party seeking to dispense with notice for a particular individual for whom notice
has not yet been waived shall file a request to dispense with notice concurrently
with the ex parte petition. The request shall set forth sufficient evidentiary facts
supporting the request. For individuals who cannot be located, the party shall file
a declaration of due diligence in compliance with California Rules of Court, rule
7.52, prior to the ex parte appearance.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

c. EX PARTE PROCEDURE

(1) Ex parte matters will be heard daily only upon appointment scheduled
directly with the designated department. The date and time of the ex parte
hearing must be confirmed with the designated department prior to the
moving party giving notice of the hearing. For purposes of this rule, the
designated department is the department already assigned to the case, or, if
the case has not yet been assigned to a department or judicial officer, the
designated department is the department assigned by the Supervising Judge.
The moving papers and the proposed order shall be faxed to the department
as directed by the judicial assistant.

(2) On the day of the ex parte appearance, the moving party shall file the
original petition or motion seeking ex parte relief with the clerk and pay the
applicable filing fees. The party shall provide the judicial officer with a
copy of the receipt showing the payment of fees to the court at the time of
the ex parte appearance; otherwise, the hearing shall not take place.
(Subd (c) amended effective July 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 7.10 amended effective July 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

7-7

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART TWO: Probate Proceedings Other Than Trusts

7.11 APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR

Except upon a showing of good cause for dispensing with notice, petitions for special letters of administration will not ordinarily be granted without the petitioning party giving notice in compliance with Probate Code section 8003 and 8110. Applications for special letters of administration may be requested ex parte, provided the application is prepared and submitted in compliance with Solano County Local Rules, rule 7.10, and California Rules of Court, rule 7.55.

(Rule 7.11 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.14 effective July 1, 1988; previously amended effective July 1, 1989.)

7.12 INFORMATION TO BE CONTAINED IN PETITIONS FOR PROBATE OF WILL AND FOR LETTERS TESTAMENTARY, FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION, OR FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION WITH WILL ANNEXED (PROBATE CODE SECTION 8000 ET SEQ.)

a. INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED WITH THE PETITION
Any petition for probate of a will and for letters testamentary, for letters of
administration, or for letters of administration with will annexed shall contain the
following information:
(1) If the heir is a minor, the heir’s date of birth.
(2) The name of any and all nominated trustees of a trust created by the will.
(3) The name of any and all trustees and beneficiaries of an inter vivos trust
created by the decedent and that is in existence at the time of the decedent’s
death.
(4) The name of any and all trustees of a special needs or other trust created to
benefit the decedent and that is in existence at the time of the decedent’s
death.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. INFORMATION CONCERNING A DECEASED BENEFICIARY
In addition to the information required in Rule 7.12(a), information concerning a
deceased beneficiary shall be included in the petition as follows:
(1) If an heir or beneficiary dies before the decedent, that person should be
listed with the notation that he or she is predeceased, and date of death. No
notice need be given to the successors in interest of the predeceased person
unless that person's interest has not lapsed by reason of death, in which case,

7-8

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART TWO: Probate Proceedings Other Than Trusts

notice should be given in the same manner as for the postdeceased heir or
beneficiary.
(2) If an heir or beneficiary dies after the decedent, that person's name should
be listed with the notation "deceased", and date of death. If a personal
representative has been appointed, the postdeceased heir or beneficiary
should be listed in care of the name and address of the personal
representative. If no personal representative has been appointed, that fact
should be alleged, and notice given to the last known address of the
postdeceased heir or beneficiary.
(3) If a named beneficiary predeceased the decedent or did not survive the
decedent for the designated survival period, that fact must be stated,
together with the actual or approximate date of death.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 7.12 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.15 effective
July 1, 1988.)

7.13 PREPARATION OF ORDERS

a. PROPOSED ORDERS SUBMITTED PRIOR TO HEARING
All probate orders in uncontested matters shall be prepared by the petitioner’s
attorney of record or the petitioner, if unrepresented, and shall be submitted at least
four court days prior to the hearing.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. MATERIAL TO BE INCLUDED IN PROBATE ORDERS
All orders or decrees in probate matters must be complete in and of themselves, so
that their effect may be understood without reference to the underlying petition.
The order or decree shall set forth all matters actually passed on by the court, the
relief granted, and the names of persons and descriptions of property or amounts of
money affected with the same particularity required of judgments in civil matters.
The court will not approve orders or decrees that merely recite that the petition as
presented is granted or incorporate by reference the relief sought in the petition.
However, in orders settling accounts, the court will ordinarily approve general
language approving the account, the report, and the acts reflected therein. With the
exception of attached schedules, no written matter shall appear after the judicial
officer’s signature line.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009; previously adopted as unlettered portion
of Rule 7.19 effective July 1, 1988.)

7-9

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART TWO: Probate Proceedings Other Than Trusts

(Rule 7.13 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.18 effective July 1, 1988.)

7.14 INTEREST ON FUNERAL AND INTERMENT CLAIMS

When accrued interest has been paid on delayed payment of claims for the reasonable costs of funeral expenses, a specific allegation must be made in the report accompanying the account in which credit has been taken for such payment, setting forth reasons for any delay in payment. The court will not allow credit for payment of interest when the delay in payment of the claims is not justified by the facts set forth. Interest for funeral and interment claims will be allowed only as provided by Health and Safety Code section 7101.

(Rule 7.14 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.21 effective July 1, 1988.)

7.15 REAL ESTATE IN INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL

If a decedent’s estate contains real property, the inventory and appraisal shall identify that property by its address and shall include a legal description of the property. If the parcel is unimproved, the inventory must so state.

(Rule 7.15 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.23 effective July 1, 1988; amended effective July 1, 1989.)

7.16 CASH DEPOSIT

A minimum cash deposit of ten percent (10%) of the purchase price (unless the loan proceeds exceed 90% of the purchase price), shall be deposited in escrow ten days prior to the confirmation of sale hearing date, and written verification of said deposit shall be filed with the court five (5) days prior to the confirmation of sale hearing date.

(Rule 7.16 renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.24 effective July 1, 1988; previously amended effective July 1, 1989.)

7-10

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART TWO: Probate Proceedings Other Than Trusts

7.17 SECOND DEEDS OF TRUST

The court will approve the taking of a promissory note secured by a second deed of trust upon a showing that it serves the best interests of the estate.

(Rule 7.17 renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.25 effective July 1, 1988.)

7.18 EARNEST MONEY DEPOSIT BY OVERBIDDER

When a sale is confirmed to an overbidder, the overbidder must submit at the time of the hearing a certified or casher's check in the amount of ten percent (10%) of the bid.

(Rule 7.18 renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.26 effective July 1, 1988.)

7.19 APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

In petitions for confirmation of sales of real estate and for sales of personal property where bidding is authorized, the court will ordinarily not proceed with the confirmation of the sale in the absence of the petitioner’s attorney, if the petitioner is represented. Where the personal representative, guardian or conservator is present and requests that the sale proceed, the court may do so, in its discretion.

(Rule 7.19 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.27 effective July 1, 1988; previously amended effective July 1, 1988.)

7.20 CONDITIONAL SALES OF REAL PROPERTY

The court will ordinarily not approve a sale of real property which is conditioned upon the occurrence of a subsequent event (such as change in zoning or obtaining approval from an environmental control board). However, if unusual and extraordinary circumstances exist and the necessity and advantage to the estate are set forth in detail, the court may approve such a sale.

(Rule 7.20 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.30 effective July 1, 1988.)

7-11

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART TWO: Probate Proceedings Other Than Trusts a. IMPROVED REAL PROPERTY
An agent or broker’s commission on the sale of improved real property shall not
exceed six percent (6%). A copy of an executed broker's agreement shall be
attached to the petition for confirmation of sale.
(Subd (a) amended effective July 1, 2009; adopted effective July 1, 1988; previously
amended effective July 1, 1989.)

b. UNIMPROVED REAL PROPERTY
An agent or broker’s commission on the sale of unimproved or raw real property
shall not exceed ten percent (10%). A copy of an executed broker's agreement shall
be attached to the petition for confirmation of sale.
(Subd (b) amended effective July 1, 2009; adopted effective July 1, 1988; previously
amended effective July 1, 1989.)

c. BROKER COMMISSIONS IN OVERBID SITUATIONS
Broker commissions in overbid situations are governed by Probate Code section
10160 et seq.
(Subd (c) amended effective July 1, 2009; adopted effective July 1, 1988; previously
amended effective July 1, 1989.)

(Rule 7.21 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.31 effective
July 1, 1988; previously amended effective July 1, 1989.)

7.22 STATUTORY COMPENSATION FOR PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE AND ATTORNEY FEES

a. INCLUSION OF COMPUTATION IN PETITION
The computation in Rule 7.22, subsection (b), must be made regardless of the
estate’s value and even though an accounting has been waived. For estates worth
in excess of $25,000,000.00 (twenty-five million dollars), the court shall determine
the reasonable amount of compensation.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

7-12

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART TWO: Probate Proceedings Other Than Trusts

b. FORMAT OF REQUEST FOR STATUTORY COMPENSATION AND ATTORNEY FEES
The basis for statutory compensation and attorney fees requested shall be set out in
the body of the petition for distribution or on a separate schedule as required per
California Rules of Court, rule 7.705.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009; previously adopted as unlettered portion
of Rule 7.36 effective July 1, 1988.)

(Rule 7.22 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.36 effective
July 1, 1988.)

7.23 PARTIAL ALLOWANCE OF STATUTORY COMPENSATION OR ATTORNEY FEES

a. COURT ORDER REQUIRED
A personal representative may not pay an advance on statutory compensation or
attorney fees without prior court order. Petitions for an advance of statutory
compensation or attorney fees may not be brought ex parte.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. REQUIREMENT OF INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL; ACCOUNTS
Notwithstanding Probate Code section 10830, the court shall not consider a petition
seeking an advance of statutory compensation or attorney fees unless the personal
representative’s Inventory and Appraisal is filed prior to or concurrently with the
petition. The court prefers that attorney fees not be requested until the first account
has been filed.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

c. AMOUNT OF STATUTORY COMPENSATION OR ATTORNEY FEES PERMITTED AS
AN ADVANCE
Any allowance for statutory compensation or attorney fees will be made in
accordance with the work actually performed. Where no accounting is filed, the
allowance may not exceed 50% of the statutory compensation computed upon the
total value appearing in the inventories filed to that time. Where an accounting is
filed, the allowance may not exceed 75 % of the statutory compensation so
computed.
(Subd (c) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 7.37 effective July 1, 1988.)

7-13

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART TWO: Probate Proceedings Other Than Trusts

d. APPORTIONMENT OF FEES FOR SUCCESSIVE ATTORNEYS
Except in a case in which there is an agreement in writing on apportionment, where
the personal representative has been represented by successive attorneys, fees will
not ordinarily be apportioned to a prior attorney for the personal representative until
the final accounting has been approved.
(Subd (d) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 7.37 effective July 1, 1988.)

(Rule 7.23 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.37 effective
July 1, 1988; previously amended effective July 1, 1989.)

7.24 APPORTIONMENT OF STATUTORY COMPENSATION BETWEEN TWO OR MORE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES

If the statutory compensation is to be divided among co-personal representatives, the petition shall set out facts upon which the court can base the apportionment.

(Rule 7.24 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.38 effective July 1, 1988.)

7.25 EXTRAORDINARY COMPENSATION FOR PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE; EXTRAORDINARY ATTORNEY FEES

a. CONTENTS OF PETITIONS OR DECLARATIONS FOR EXTRAORDINARY
COMPENSATION OR FEES
All applications for extraordinary compensation for the personal representative's
services and for extraordinary attorney's fees must be supported in the petition or
in the separate verified declaration requesting said fees. At a minimum, the
declaration or petition shall state:
(1) The nature, necessity, success, cost in time, detail of the services performed
and value of the services believed to warrant additional fees;
(2) The amount requested; and,
(3) The number of hours spent on ordinary services.
Records of time spent, without substantiated information, are not adequate.
(Subd (a) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 7.39 effective July 1, 1988.)

7-14

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART TWO: Probate Proceedings Other Than Trusts

b. FACTORS THAT WILL NOT SUPPORT A REQUEST FOR EXTRAORDINARY
COMPENSATION OR FEES
The routine conduct of any proceeding relating to the collection of assets,
processing of claims, conduct of estate administration or distribution will not, in
the absence of special circumstances or problems, justify an extraordinary fee.
(Subd (b) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 7.39 effective July 1, 1988.)

(Rule 7.25 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.39 effective
July 1, 1988.)

7.26 DISTRIBUTIVE CONTINGENCIES

If the right of a beneficiary to distribution of part of the estate is dependent upon the occurrence of an event (e.g., death of a parent), the petition must allege the occurrence of that event and the order must contain a finding of the occurrence of that event.

(Rule 7.26 renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.41 effective July 1, 1988.)

7.27 CONTENTS OF PETITION AND DECREE OF PARTIAL OR FINAL DISTRIBUTION

a. WHEN PROPOSED DECREE REQUIRED
The proposed form of Decree of Distribution shall be filed with any petition for
partial or final distribution.
(Subd (a) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 7.42 effective July 1, 1988.)

b. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE DISTRIBUTED
The distribution of property must be separately stated in detail in both the petition
and the decree, listing a description of the property to be distributed under the name
of each beneficiary. Real estate shall be legally described and street address, if any,
shall be included. The decree must be complete in and of itself. Description by
reference to the inventory is not acceptable. In both the petition and decree for
final distribution, the distribution schedule shall include a summary showing the
value of the estate distributed to each beneficiary and the total estate distributed
which must agree with "Property on Hand" as shown on the final account’s
Schedule F and in the summary of account. If any beneficiaries previously received
an early distribution, the petition and the decree shall so state.

7-15

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART TWO: Probate Proceedings Other Than Trusts

(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2010; amended and relettered effective July
1, 2009; adopted as unlettered portion of Rule 7.42 effective July 1, 1988.)

c. TRACING REQUIRED FOR INTESTATE DECEDENT
If an intestate decedent who survived his spouse leaves no issue, the applicability
of Probate Code Section 6402.5 must be alleged and the necessary tracing must be
carried out as far as possible.
(Subd (c) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 7.42 effective July 1, 1988.)

d. OTHER ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PETITION AND DECREE

(1) A petition and any decree for distribution shall include the names and
addresses of all persons who are present and future distributees of the estate,
and shall indicate whether each person listed is an adult or a minor. In all
cases where a minor is a distributee, the minor’s age and birth date must be
stated in the petition and the decree for distribution.
(Subd (1) adopted effective January 1, 2010.)

(2) If distribution will not be made directly to the beneficiary, the name, address
and fiduciary capacity of the recipient must be stated in the petition and the
decree for distribution. If distribution is to be made to an assignee of an heir
or devisee, a copy of the assignment and the terms thereof must be on file.
(Subd (2) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective January 1,
2010.)

(3) If a reserve is sought, the petition for final distribution must specifically set
forth the proposed use for the retained funds (e.g., income taxes, closing
costs, property tax assessments, etc.).
(Subd (3) adopted effective January 1, 2013.)
(Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective January 1, 2010.)

(Rule 7.27 amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted as Rule 7.42 effective July 1, 1988;
previously amended effective July 1, 1989; amended and renumbered effective July 1,
2009; amended effective January 1, 2010.)

7-16

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART TWO: Probate Proceedings Other Than Trusts a. DISTRIBUTIONS TO TESTAMENTARY TRUSTS
The provisions of a decree of distribution establishing a testamentary trust shall
include all of the terms of the will relating to the trust. Per California Rules of Court,
rule 7.650, the provisions of the trust shall be stated in the present tense and in the
third person, and shall not quote the will verbatim. If a trust beneficiary will receive
distribution upon reaching a specific age, the petition for distribution and decree
thereon must state the age and birthdate of the beneficiary.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2010; amended and relettered effective July
1, 2009; adopted as unlettered portion of Rule 7.43 effective July 1, 1988.)

b. DISTRIBUTIONS TO INTER VIVOS TRUSTS
A decree of distribution which distributes assets to an inter vivos trust shall name
the trust and specify the name of the trustee to receive the assets. The decree of
distribution shall not be approved absent a declaration by the trustee that he or she
has in fact accepted the trust. A decree of distribution for a decedent’s estate shall
not name as beneficiaries of the estate in the distribution plan any beneficiaries who
are entitled to distributions from the trust.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 7.28 amended effective January 1, 2010; amended and renumbered effective July 1,
2009; adopted as Rule 7.43 effective July 1, 1988; former Rule 7.28, which concerned
overbids, repealed effective July 1, 2009.)

7.29 JOINT TENANCY ASSETS

In the absence of prior court determination or authorization, joint tenancy assets of the decedent and a person other than the decedent’s spouse should not be inventoried as assets of the probate estate. However, an asset held in joint tenancy between the decedent and the decedent’s spouse, or former spouse in appropriate cases, shall be inventoried if there is an unadjudicated allegation that the asset is in fact community property. A notation concerning the allegation shall be included in all inventory and appraisals until the asset’s characterization is determined.

(Rule 7.29 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.49 effective July 1, 1988; former Rule 7.29, which concerned increased bid forms, repealed effective July 1, 2009.)

7-17

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART TWO: Probate Proceedings Other Than Trusts

7.30 PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE COMPENSATION AND ATTORNEY FEES IN CONNECTION WITH TERMINATION OF A JOINT TENANCY OR HANDLING OF OTHER NONPROBATE ASSETS

Assets that pass outside of probate are outside the court’s jurisdiction. Therefore, a
personal representative or his or her attorney shall not request payment from a probate
estate for work done concerning joint tenancy assets or other nonprobate assets, and any
request for such relief shall be denied. However, this rule does not prevent a request for
extraordinary fees where the termination of joint tenancy with a previously deceased joint
tenant is necessary to clear title to property in the decedent's estate.

(Rule 7.30 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.50 effective
July 1, 1988.)

7.31 COURT INVESTIGATOR FEES FOR INVESTIGATION OF PETITION FOR PARTICULAR TRANSACTION

Pursuant to Probate Code section 3140, the court may, in its discretion, appoint a court investigator to evaluate a petition for a proposed transaction involving an incapacitated spouse’s community property and report to the court regarding the transaction’s advisability. Appointment of a court investigator for such an investigation shall result in an assessment against the petitioning party for the costs of the investigation. The fee amount is determined by the court on an annual basis and is subject to change. The assessed fee is payable within 30 days after the Assessment and Order for Payment is mailed by the Court Investigators Office.

(Rule 7.31 adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

7.32 RECEIPT OR WAIVER OF ACCOUNT SIGNED BY ATTORNEY IN FACT

Any waiver of account or any receipt of a distribution filed with the court that has been signed by an “attorney in fact” on a beneficiary’s behalf shall include a copy of the power of attorney granting authority to the attorney in fact to waive the account or sign the receipt.

(Rule 7.32 adopted effective July 1, 2010.)

7-18

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART TWO: Probate Proceedings Other Than Trusts a. EXPENSES THAT MAY BE REIMBURSED
The following may be reimbursed to a personal representative and/or a personal
representative’s counsel as expenses of administration:
(1) Court filing fees;
(2) Newspaper publication fees;
(3) Surety bond premium;
(4) Probate referee appraisal fees; and,
(5) Other expenses specifically approved by the court.

b. EXPENSES THAT MAY NOT BE REIMBURSED
Unless the requesting party demonstrates extraordinary circumstances, the
following will not ordinarily be reimbursed to a personal representative and/or a
personal representative’s counsel as expenses of administration:
(1) Secretarial and word processing time;
(2) Computer time, including expenses incurred in performing computerized
legal research;
(3) Local telephone calls;
(4) Facsimile transmissions;
(5) Local mileage and parking; and,
(6) Postage and photocopies.

(Rule 7.33 adopted effective January 1, 2013.)

7.34 – 7.49 [RESERVED]

7-19

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART THREE: Trusts

7.50 BENEFICIARIES OF TESTAMENTARY TRUST TO BE LISTED IN PETITION FOR LETTERS TESTAMENTARY

All petitions involving a testamentary trust must set forth the names and last known addresses of all vested and contingent beneficiaries.

(Rule 7.50 amended and renumbered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.45 effective July 1, 1988.)

7.51 TRUSTEE FEES

a. APPLICABILITY OF RULE
This rule applies to all trusts subject to the continuing jurisdiction of the court, to
petitions for approval of trustee compensation, and to objections to petitions for
trustee compensation.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. PRESUMPTION OF REASONABLE COMPENSATION FOR TRUSTEES
Trustee compensation shall be presumed reasonable if it does not exceed 1% (one
percent) of the asset value of the estate at the time the compensation is sought.
However, nothing in this rule limits the court’s discretion to find as unreasonable a
fee totaling less than 1%, or to approve a trustee’s fee that exceeds 1%.
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

c. REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION
A trustee may request fees in excess of 1% (one percent) of the asset value of the
estate. A trustee requesting such relief shall do one of the following:

(1) File a declaration from the beneficiaries indicating awareness of the fees
being requested and a statement waiving objection to those fees.

(2) File a declaration detailing the services rendered justifying the fee
requested.
(Subd (c) amended and relettered effective July 1, 2009; adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 7.46 effective July 1, 1988.)

(Rule 7.51 amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted as Rule 7.46 effective July 1, 1988;
previously amended effective July 1, 1988; amended and renumbered effective July 1,
2009.)

7-20

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART THREE: Trusts

7.52 INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN PETITIONS CONCERNING TRUSTS

All petitions concerning trusts shall indicate in the pleading title the Probate Code section(s) under which the petition is brought or which supports the relief requested. For example, a petition seeking orders concerning the internal affairs of a trust shall cite Probate Code section 17200 in the pleading title.

(Rule 7.52 adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

7.53 GENERAL PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS

a. ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS IN SOLANO COUNTY
If a special needs trust is included as part of a minor’s compromise or other
judgment entered in Solano County, the following procedures shall be followed:

(1) A petition to approve the terms of the special needs trust shall be filed in
the civil action or petition to approve minor’s compromise. The judge
assigned to hear the civil action or petition to approve minor’s compromise
shall approve the terms of the special needs trust per Probate Code section
3604. The petition shall include the complete terms of the proposed trust.

(2) Once so approved and signed, the original special needs trust instrument
and a copy of the order approving the trust shall be filed in the county in
which the trust is to be administered pursuant to that county’s procedures.
If the trust is to be administered in Solano County, the trust shall be filed in
a separate file and assigned a probate case number. No filing fee shall be
charged for said filing as the trust instrument is the result of a petition filed
to approve a minor’s compromise claim per Probate Code section 3600 et
seq. Government Code §70655.

(3) The party filing the special needs trust instrument per subsection (2) shall
file a notice in the civil action file or the minor’s compromise file indicating
the county in which the trust is being administered and the case number
assigned to the probate file containing the special needs trust.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

7-21

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART THREE: Trusts

b. TRANSFER OF SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS INTO SOLANO COUNTY
Whenever a special needs trust is transferred into Solano County and the court file
being transferred does not contain the original special needs trust instrument, the
trustee shall provide the court with the original trust document within 90 days after
the court file is received by Solano County.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 7.53 amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

7.54 ACCOUNTINGS AND REPORTS OF SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS

a. EXPENDITURES ON BEHALF OF BENEFICIARY
In all accountings for special needs trusts, the trustee shall provide an explanation
of any unusual or extraordinary expenses incurred by the trustee on behalf of the
beneficiary. These include, but are not limited to, payment of all expenses
associated with real property partially owned by the trust, payment of automobile
insurance for a vehicle not owned by the trust, acquisition or maintenance of assets
not ordinarily used by a beneficiary with the beneficiary’s type of disability, and so
forth.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. HIRING OF AGENTS
The court acknowledges that trustees of special needs trusts often hire agents to
advise them concerning the administration of the special needs trusts and the
provision of services to the beneficiary. A trustee hiring such an agent shall specify
in any report or accounting seeking approval of payment to said agent the type of
and need for the services provided by the agent. The trustee shall also include a
declaration from the agent concerning the hours spent working with the trustee and
the amount of compensation sought.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

c. PARENTS AS CAREGIVERS TO CHILD AS BENEFICIARY
In an account or report indicating that a parent was hired to provide caregiver
services to his or her child, the trustee shall provide the following information:
(1) A description of the services rendered by the parent that are above and
beyond the care normally provided by a parent to a child.
(2) A description of the special skills possessed by the parent enabling him or
her to perform these services.
(3) The benefit to the beneficiary of having the parent perform the services
instead of a professional caregiver.

7-22

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 7 – Probate

PART THREE: Trusts

(4) The hours worked by the parent.
(5) The hourly rate being paid to the parent and a justification of that rate.
Justification may include a comparison to the rate charged by a professional
for the same or similar services.
(6) Whether caregiving services are being provided through IHSS and if so, the
frequency and type of the services provided.
(7) Whether insurance is in place to cover the caregiver parent in case of injury
and if so, the amount of the periodic premium being paid by the parent or
the trust.
(Subd (c) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 7.54 adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

7.55 COMPENSATION OF CONSERVATOR FROM TRUST

If a conservatee is also the beneficiary of a trust and the compensation of a conservator of

the person or estate, or his or her attorney, is sought from the trust in part or in whole, the conservator shall first seek approval of the compensation in the conservatorship matter. The petition shall include a declaration by the trustee as to whether there are sufficient funds in the trust to allow for the compensation sought. If the conservatorship of the estate has sufficient funds to pay for the requested compensation, the conservator shall explain why compensation is sought from the trust and not the estate. A trustee shall not pay a conservator’s compensation without a court order approving said compensation by the judge assigned to hear the conservatorship matter.

(Rule 7.55 amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

7.56 TRUST ACCOUNTINGS FILED WITH THE COURT

Any time a petition seeking approval of a trust accounting is filed with the court, the filing party shall simultaneously submit to the court an additional courtesy copy of the petition and the accounting.

(Rule 7.56 adopted effective July 1, 2010.)

7-23

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 8 – Compromises of Claims

8.1 CONTENTS OF PETITION FOR COMPROMISE OF CLAIM OF A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY OR A MINOR

A petition for court approval of a compromise or covenant not to sue regarding a person
with a disability or a minor shall comply in all respects with California Rules of Court,
rule 3.1384, and shall be presented on the mandatory Judicial Council form MC-350. In
addition, the petition shall include:
(1) A full disclosure of all information concerning the reasonableness of the proposed
compromise or covenant not to sue, including the amounts, if any, paid to other
claimants.
(2) The original or a photocopy of each bill which, if paid, shall disclose the date of
payment, the amount paid, and the name of the payor.

(Rule 8.1 amended effective July 1, 2014; adopted effective July 1, 1988; previously
amended effective July 1, 2009, and January 1, 2010, and July 1, 2010.)

8.2 FILING PETITIONS FOR COMPROMISE OF CLAIMS

In cases where no action is pending, a petition to compromise either a minor’s claim or a claim of an adult with disabilities shall be filed as an independent case with the Probate Division.

In cases where a civil action is pending, a petition to compromise either a minor’s claim or a claim of an adult with disabilities shall be filed within the pending civil action.

(Rule 8.2 adopted effectie July 1, 2014.)

8.3 ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS

If a compromise of claim or covenant not to sue includes the establishment of a special needs trust with a person with a disability or a minor as beneficiary, the establishment of the trust shall comply with Solano County Local Rules, rule 7.53.

(Rule 8.3 amended effective July 1, 2014; adopted effective July 1, 2009; previously amended effective January 1, 2010, and July 1, 2010; previous Rule 8.3, concerning representation of specified parties by counsel at hearings, repealed effective July 1, 2009.)

8-1

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 9 – Attorney Fees in Default Matters,
Promissory Notes, Contracts, and Foreclosures a. RECOVERY OF “REASONABLE” ATTORNEY FEES IN DEFAULT CASES
Except in open book accounts, whenever the obligation sued upon provides for the
recovery of “reasonable” attorney fees and the matter is heard as an unlimited civil
matter, the fees in each default case shall be fixed, based on the principal amount
only, pursuant to the schedule set forth in subsection (d).
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective May 13, 1988;
amended effective January 1, 2009.)

b. ATTORNEY FEES IN JUDGMENTS ISSUED BY THE CLERK OF THE COURT
Except in open book accounts, in unlimited civil matters where the Clerk of the
Court may issue a Judgment, attorney fees shall be calculated using the schedule
set forth in subsection (d).
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2009; adopted effective May 13, 1988.)

c. REQUEST FOR FEES IN EXCESS OF SCHEDULED FEES
Any attorney seeking fees in excess of those provided for in subsection (d) shall be
required to apply for a hearing on the Default Calendar and supply an affidavit in
accordance with Code of Civil Procedure section 585.
(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2009; adopted effective May 13, 1988.)

d. SCHEDULE OF ATTORNEY FEES
Attorney fees shall be calculated using the following formula:

25% of the first $1,000 (with a minimum of $150)
20% of the next $4,000
15% of the next $5,000
10% of the next $10,000
5% of the next $30,000
2% over $50,000

An example of this calculation appears in Appendix A to Rule 9.
(Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective May 13, 1988.)

9-1

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 9 – Attorney Fees in Default Matters,
Promissory Notes, Contracts, and Foreclosures

e. ATTORNEY FEES IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER ACTIONS
The fee schedule set forth in Rule 9.1 shall not apply to unlawful detainer actions,
which are governed by Rule 14.2.
(Subd (e) adopted effective January 1, 2010.)

(Rule 9.1 amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective May 13, 1988; amended
effective January 1, 2009, and January 1, 2010.)

9.2 ATTORNEY FEES - LIMITED CIVIL MATTERS

a. ATTORNEY FEES FOR DEFAULT LIMITED CIVIL MATTERS (CCP §585(a))
Except for open book accounts, attorney fees in default limited civil matters shall
be calculated on the principal obligation only per the schedule set forth in
subsection (c), subject to any limitations set forth elsewhere in Rule 9.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective May 13, 1988;
amended effective January 1, 2009.)

b. REQUEST FOR FEES IN EXCESS OF SCHEDULED FEES
Any attorney seeking fees in excess of those provided for by the schedule in
subsection (c) is required to apply for a hearing on the Default Calendar or supply
an affidavit in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure section 585(d).
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2009; adopted effective May 13, 1988.)

c. SCHEDULE OF ATTORNEY FEES

Amount Fees
$1.00 to $600.00 $150.00
$600.00 to $1,000.00 $150.00 plus 25% of amount over $600.00
$1,000.00 to $10,000.00 $250.00 plus 15% of amount over $1,000.00
$10,000.00 to $25,000.00 $1,600.00 plus 10% of amount over $10,000.00
(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2009; adopted effective May 13, 1988.)

d. ATTORNEY FEES IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER ACTIONS
The fee schedule set forth in Rule 9.2 shall not apply to unlawful detainer actions,
which are governed by Rule 14.3.
(Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective May 13, 1988.)

(Rule 9.2 amended effective January 1, 2012; previously adopted as unlettered portion of
Rule 9.1 effective May 13, 1988; adopted as Rule 9.2 effective January 1, 2009; amended
effective January 1, 2010.)

9-2

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 9 – Attorney Fees in Default Matters,
Promissory Notes, Contracts, and Foreclosures a. ATTORNEY FEES IN OPEN BOOK ACCOUNTS
Subject to subsection (b), attorney fees in all open book accounts shall be calculated
on the principal obligation only pursuant to the following schedule:

Amount Fees
$1.00 to $600.00 $150.00
$600.00 to $1,000.00 $150.00 plus 25% of amount over $600.00
$1,000.00 to $10,000.00 $250.00 plus 15% of amount over $1,000.00
$10,000.00 to $25,000.00 $1,600.00 plus 10% of amount over $10,000.00
(Subd. (a) amended effective January 1, 2012.)

b. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE ATTORNEY FEES IN OPEN BOOK ACCOUNTS
The maximum fee allowable in open book accounts shall be as set forth in Civil
Code section 1717.5.
(Subd. (b) amended effective July 1, 2016; previously amended effective January
1, 2012.)

(Rule 9.3 amended effective July 1, 2016; adopted effective January 1, 2009; previously amended effective January 1, 2012.)

9-3

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 9 – Attorney Fees in Default Matters, Promissory Notes, Contracts, and Foreclosures

APPENDIX

9-A: Example of Attorney Fee Calculation per Rule 9.1

Demand of Complaint - $54,000.00

1. 25% of the first $1,000 = $250.00 (the minimum fee of $150 would apply if the amount of the demand was under $1,000) Subtract $1,000 from the total demand of the complaint - $54,000 - $1,000 = $53,000

2. 20% of the next $4,000 = $800 Subtract $4,000 from the remaining balance - $53,000 = $4,000 = $49,000

3. 15% of the next $5,000 = $750 Subtract $5,000 from the remaining balance - $49,000 - $5,000 = $44,000

4. 10% of the next $10,000 = $1,000 Subtract $10,000 from the remaining balance - $44,000 = $10,000 = $34,000

5. 5% of the next $30,000 = $1,500 Subtract $30,000 from the remaining balance - $34,000 = $30,000 = $4,000

6. 2% over $50,000 (this percent should be calculated on any remaining amount, in this instance $4,000) – 2% of $4,000 = $80

Total attorney’s fees: $4,380

9-4

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 10 – Administration

10.1 EXECUTIVE OFFICER

A majority of the judges of the court may appoint a court executive officer pursuant to section 71620 of the Government Code who also acts as jury commissioner and clerk of the court. Any reference in these rules, the California Rules of Court, or statutes, to the executive officer, clerk of the court or jury commissioners refers to the executive officer, who functions in each of these capacities.

The powers, duties and responsibilities transferred from the county clerk to the court executive officer pursuant to this rule include all of those performed by the county clerk with respect to court sections, proceedings and records.

The county clerk is hereby relieved of any obligation imposed by law with respect to the above powers, duties and responsibilities. This rule does not transfer from the county clerk to the court executive officer obligations in reference to the issuance of marriage licenses or the filing of fictitious business names.

(Rule 10.1 amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective July 1, 1988.)

10.2 RESERVATION OF GOVERNMENT CODE 71620 POWERS

The Court reserves the power to delegate to the Court Executive Officer any other functions, duties and responsibilities relating to the operation of the court not otherwise specifically set forth in this chapter, as provided for by Government Code 71620.

(Rule 10.2 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as Rule 10.4 effective January 1, 1991; former Rule 10.2, which concerned transfer of staff, repealed effective January 1, 2010.)

10-1

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 11 – Jury Management

11.1 – 11.99 [Reserved]

11-1

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 12 – Mental Health Conservatorships (LPS)

12.1 – 12.99 [Reserved]

12-1

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 13 – Appeals

13.1 FEE WAIVER APPLICATIONS FOR MATTERS BEING APPEALED TO THE COURT OF APPEAL

a. FEE WAIVER REQUEST PROCEDURE GENERALLY
Where a party appealing a matter seeks a waiver of court fees and costs from the
Superior Court of California, County of Solano as well as from the First District
Court of Appeal and a fee waiver request has not been filed directly with the First
District Court of Appeal, the party shall submit two separate Request to Waive
Court Fees forms (Judicial Council form FW-001) to the Clerk of the Superior
Court. One form shall be directed to the superior court and the other form shall be
directed to the First District Court of Appeal.
(Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2010.)

b. PROCEDURE FOR WAIVING FEES AT THE SUPERIOR COURT
The request to waive fees on appeal at the superior court level shall be processed
and determined per Government Code section 68630 et seq.
(Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2010.)

c. PROCEDURE FOR WAIVING FEES AT THE COURT OF APPEAL
The superior court shall receive and transmit to the First District Court of Appeal
for filing, processing and determination any fee waiver which seeks to waive fees
charged by the First District Court of Appeal. The superior court’s acceptance of
the FW-001 form on behalf of the Court of Appeal shall not be deemed a “filing”
for purposes of Government Code section 68634.5, subdivision (f).
(Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2010.)

(Rule 13.1 adopted effective January 1, 2010.)

13-1

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 14 – Unlawful Detainer

14.1 TELEPHONIC APPEARANCES

Telephonic appearances in unlawful detainer cases will be permitted only to the extent authorized by California Rules of Court, rule 3.670, and in the manner required by that rule and Solano County Local Rules, rule 4.12(h).

(Rule 14.1 amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective January 1, 2009.)

14.2 TRIAL MANAGEMENT

The court may, in its discretion, order the parties to an unlawful detainer matter to participate in a trial management conference and/or settlement conference in cases where the case is to be tried by a jury.

(Rule 14.2 adopted effective January 1, 2010.)

14.3 ATTORNEY FEES IN DEFAULT MATTERS

a. CASES FILED AS LIMITED CIVIL MATTERS
In default unlawful detainer actions filed as limited civil matters, the attorney fees
are fixed upon the schedule set forth in subsection (c), based on principal only, with
a minimum of $300.00. The maximum fee shall not exceed the court's jurisdiction.
Any attorney seeking fees in an unlawful detainer action in excess of those provided
for by the schedule in subsection (c) is required to apply for a hearing on the Default
Calendar or supply an affidavit in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure section
585(d).
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2012; previously adopted as unlettered
portion of Rule 9.1 effective May 13, 1988; amended and relettered as Subd (d) of
Rule 9.1 effective January 1, 2009; adopted as subd (a) effective January 1, 2010.)

b. CASES FILED AS UNLIMITED CIVIL MATTERS
In default unlawful detainer actions filed as unlimited civil matters, the attorney
fees are fixed upon the schedule set forth in subsection (c), based on principal only,
with a minimum of $300.00. Any attorney seeking fees in an unlawful detainer
action in excess of those provided for by the schedule in subsection (c) is required
to apply for a hearing on the Default Calendar or supply an affidavit in accordance
with Code of Civil Procedure section 585(d).
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective January 1, 2010.)

14-1

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 14 – Unlawful Detainer

c. SCHEDULE OF ATTORNEY FEES
Attorney fees in unlawful detainer actions shall be calculated as follows:

25% of the first $1,000, with a minimum of $300
15% of the next $9,000
10% of the next $15,000
(Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2010.)

(Rule 14.3 amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective January 1, 2010.)

14-2

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART ONE: Guardianships

15.1 APPLICABILITY OF GUARDIANSHIP RULES; TERMINOLOGY; DIRECT CALENDARING

a. APPLICABILITY
These guardianship rules apply to all guardianships of the person, the estate, or
both, which are filed pursuant to the Probate Code. These guardianship rules do
not apply to guardianships under the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009;
amended effective January 1, 2012.)

b. TERMINOLOGY
Unless otherwise indicated in a particular rule, all references to a “ward” shall
include a proposed ward and references to a “guardian” shall include a proposed
guardian.
(Subd (b) relettered effective January 1, 2013; adopted as subd (c) effective July 1,
2009; previous subd (b) repealed effective January 1, 2013.)

c. DIRECT CALENDARING
When a guardianship or conservatorship case is filed, or received and filed as a
transfer from another county, the Clerk of the Court shall assign the case in a
manner directed by and subject to the approval of the Supervising Judge of the
Family Law Division. The assignment to a judge shall be deemed to be for all
purposes.
(Subd (c) relettered effective January 1, 2013; adopted as subd (d) effective
January 1, 2012.)

(Rule 15.1 amended effective January 1, 2012; previously adopted as Rule 7.52 effective
July 1, 2008; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15.2 FORMS TO BE FILED AT COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDING

a. FORMS FOR GENERAL GUARDIANSHIP OF THE PERSON ONLY
In addition to any required Judicial Council forms, a petitioner seeking the
appointment of a guardian of the person only must file the following local forms
with the clerk of the court:

(1) Declaration Regarding Venue, or a declaration contained within the petition
that is in substantial compliance with rule 15.2(c);

15-1

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART ONE: Guardianships

(2) Court Investigator’s Information and Referral Form; and,

(3) Order Appointing Investigator.

(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. FORMS AND DECLARATIONS FOR GENERAL GUARDIANSHIP OF THE PERSON AND
THE ESTATE OR OF THE ESTATE ONLY
In addition to any required Judicial Council forms, a petitioner seeking the
appointment of a guardian of the person and the estate, or of the estate only, must
file the following local forms and declarations with the clerk of the court:

(1) Declaration Regarding Venue, or a declaration contained within the petition
that is in substantial compliance with rule 15.2(c);

(2) Preliminary Inventory of Guardianship Estate;

(3) Court Investigator’s Information and Referral Form; and,

(4) Order Appointing Investigator.

(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

c. DECLARATION REGARDING VENUE

(1) Proposed Wards who are Residents of California
In order to ensure compliance with Probate Code section 2200 et seq., in all
petitions for guardianship of the person and/or the estate where the proposed
ward is a resident of the State of California, the petitioner shall include a
declaration indicating whether the proposed ward is a resident of Solano
County at the time the petition is filed. If the proposed ward is not a resident
of Solano County, the declaration shall state why it is in the proposed ward’s
best interests to have the guardianship proceeding heard in Solano County.
The declaration may be filed on a local form designated for that purpose or
in a declaration in substantial compliance with this rule, or may be included
in the body of the petition for guardianship.
(Subd (1) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1,
2009.)

15-2

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART ONE: Guardianships

(2) Proposed Wards who are Not Residents of California – Guardianships
of the Person
In order to ensure compliance with Probate Code section 2200 et seq., in all
petitions for guardianship of the person where the proposed ward is not a
resident of the State of California, the petitioner shall include a declaration
indicating whether the proposed ward is temporarily living in Solano
County at the time the petition is filed. If the proposed ward is not
temporarily living in Solano County, the declaration shall state why it is in
the proposed ward’s best interests to have the guardianship proceeding
heard in Solano County. The declaration may be filed on a local form
designated for that purpose or in a declaration in substantial compliance
with this rule, or may be included in the body of the petition for
guardianship.
(Subd (2) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1,
2009.)

(3) Proposed Wards who are Not Residents of California – Guardianships
of the Estate
In order to ensure compliance with Probate Code section 2200 et seq., in all
petitions for guardianship of the estate where the proposed ward is not a
resident of the State of California, the petitioner shall include a declaration
indicating whether the proposed ward is temporarily living in Solano
County at the time the petition is filed or whether the proposed ward has
property in Solano County. If the proposed ward is not temporarily living
in Solano County and does not have property in Solano County, the
declaration shall state why it is in the proposed ward’s best interests to have
the guardianship proceeding heard in Solano County. The declaration may
be filed on a local form designated for that purpose or in a declaration in
substantial compliance with this rule, or may be included in the body of the
petition for guardianship.
(Subd (3) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1,
2009.)
(Subd (c) relettered and amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted as subd (e)
effective July 1, 2009; prior subd (c) repealed effective January 1, 2013.)

d. FORMS FOR TEMPORARY GUARDIANSHIP OF THE PERSON AND/OR THE ESTATE
[Repealed]
(Subd (d) repealed effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15-3

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART ONE: Guardianships

(Rule 15.2 amended effective January 1, 2013; previously adopted as Rule 7.53 effective July 1, 2008; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15.3 NOTICE

a. ADDRESSES FOR SOLANO COUNTY AGENCIES ENTITLED TO NOTICE
The addresses for the Solano County Superior Court Investigator, the Director of
Social Services, and the Solano County Health and Social Services Department are
listed in Appendix 15-A.
(Subd (a) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2013; adopted as subd (b)
effective July 1, 2009; previous subd (a) repealed effective January 1, 2013.)

b. DECLARATION OF DUE DILIGENCE
If a petitioner cannot serve or locate a person for whom notice is required, the
petitioner shall file a local form designated for that purpose or a substantially
equivalent declaration which complies with this rule. The declaration must specify
the name of the person whose whereabouts are unknown, the last known address of
the person, the approximate date when the person was last known to reside at that
address, all efforts undertaken to identify and serve or locate the person, and any
facts that explain why the person cannot be located. To the extent appropriate, the
petitioner shall make the following efforts and state the results in the declaration:
(1) Search the public records in any county where the person was last known
or believed to reside, including real and personal property indexes in the
recorder’s and assessor’s offices, the local telephone directory and directory
assistance, the county’s voter registration, the county’s vital statistics office,
and any non-confidential court files concerning or involving the person;
(2) Search all appropriate Internet search engines;
(3) Inquiry of the person’s current or former employer(s);
(4) Inquiry of the person’s current or former landlord(s) and neighbors;
(5) Inquiry of the person’s last known residential address and any neighbors of
that address;
(6) Inquiry of any relatives, friends, or other individuals who might have
knowledge of the person’s whereabouts; and,
(7) Inquiry of any appropriate county, state, and federal correctional systems in
which the petitioner believes or has reason to believe the person is or may
be incarcerated.
(Subd (b) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2013; adopted as subd (f)
adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15-4

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART ONE: Guardianships

c. DOCUMENTS TO BE SERVED [Repealed]
(Subd (c) repealed effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

d. PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE [Repealed]
(Subd (d) repealed effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

e. PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL [Repealed]
(Subd (e) repealed effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

f. DECLARATION OF DUE DILIGENCE [Relettered]
(Subd (f) relettered as subdivision (b) effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective
July 1, 2009.)

g. ORDER DISPENSING WITH NOTICE [Repealed]
(Subd (g) repealed effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

h. NOTICE IN TEMPORARY GUARDIANSHIPS [Repealed]
(Subd (h) repealed effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2008.)

(Rule 15.3 amended effective January 1, 2013; previously adopted as Rule 7.52 effective
July 1, 1989; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15.4 APPOINTMENT OF INVESTIGATOR

a. APPOINTMENT OF INVESTIGATOR IN RELATIVE GUARDIANSHIPS
The court shall appoint the Court Investigators Office to perform an investigation
pursuant to Probate Code section 1513 where the proposed guardian is a relative of
the ward within the second degree. For purposes of this rule, a person shall be
considered a relative within the second degree if they are related to the ward as
described in Probate Code section 1513, subdivision (g).
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. APPOINTMENT OF INVESTIGATOR IN NON-RELATIVE GUARDIANSHIPS
In all probate guardianship matters where the proposed guardian is not a relative of
the ward within the second degree as defined by Probate Code section 1513,
subdivision (g), the court shall appoint the Solano County Department of Health &
Social Services to perform an investigation pursuant to Probate Code sections 1513
and 1543.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15-5

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART ONE: Guardianships

c. SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS ON INVESTIGATOR – RELATIVE GUARDIANSHIPS
In guardianship proceedings where the court has appointed the Court Investigators
Office, the petitioner or the petitioner's attorney must serve the Court Investigators
Office with a copy of the following documents at least thirty (30) days prior to the
hearing date:

(1) Notice of Hearing – Guardianship or Conservatorship (Judicial Council
form GC-020);

(2) A copy of the Petition for Guardianship (Judicial Council form GC-210 or
GC-210(P)); and

(3) A completed Court Investigator's Information and Referral Form (Solano
County Local Form no. 3490)

The documents shall be delivered or mailed to the address listed in Appendix 15 -
A.
(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

d. SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS ON INVESTIGATOR – NON-RELATIVE GUARDIANSHIPS
In guardianship proceedings where the court has appointed the Solano County
Department of Health & Social Services (“Department”) to investigate the
guardianship petition, the petitioner or the petitioner's attorney must serve the
Department with a copy of the following documents thirty (30) days prior to the
hearing date:

(1) Notice of Hearing – Guardianship or Conservatorship (Judicial Council
form GC-020);

(2) A copy of the Petition for Guardianship (Judicial Council form GC-210 or
GC-210(P)); and,

(3) Any other forms that may be required by the Department.

The documents shall be delivered or mailed to the address listed in
Appendix 15-A.
(Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted July 1, 2009.)

15-6

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART ONE: Guardianships

e. DUTY TO UPDATE INFORMATION GIVEN TO INVESTIGATOR
The petitioner must advise the investigating office of any changes to the contact
information of the ward, guardian, or proposed guardian.
(Subd (e) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

f. DUTY TO COOPERATE WITH INVESTIGATOR
All parties, including, but not limited to, the petitioner, the proposed or appointed
guardian, the parent(s) of the ward, and any attorneys for the parties, including
appointed counsel for the ward or proposed ward, are to cooperate fully with the
appointed investigator. Failure to cooperate may be punishable with sanctions
pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 575.2, in the court’s discretion.
(Subd (f) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

g. SERVICE OF SUBPOENA ON COURT INVESTIGATOR
Any subpoena to compel a court investigator’s presence at a hearing or trial must
be served in compliance with Government Code sections 68097.1 and 68097.2.
Said subpoena shall be served personally on the court investigator, on the Court
Executive Officer, or an agent designated by the Court Executive Officer, during
the court’s normal business hours. The subpoena shall be accompanied by payment
in the amount required by Government Code section 68097.2 for each day that the
court investigator is required to remain in attendance at the hearing or trial pursuant
to the subpoena; otherwise, the subpoena shall not be accepted or service deemed
complete.

In order to give the court investigator reasonable time for preparation, the
subpoenaing party shall serve the subpoena a minimum of 10 court days prior to
the first date the court investigator is to appear at the hearing or trial, unless the
court investigator agrees to a shorter period of time.
(Subd (g) amended effective July 1, 2013; adopted effective January 1, 2012;
amended effective January 1, 2013.)

(Rule 15.4 amended effective July 1, 2013; adopted as Rule 7.55 effective July 1, 2008;
adopted as Rule 15.4 effective July 1, 2009; amended effective January 1, 2012, and
January 1, 2013.)

15-7

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART ONE: Guardianships a. COURT INVESTIGATOR FEES GENERALLY
A fee for the services of the Court Investigators Office shall be imposed upon the
person(s) so responsible for payment per Probate Code section 1513.1. The rate of
this fee depends on the nature of the investigation and is determined by the court
on an annual basis. All rates are subject to change. The amount of the fee payable
shall be determined by the fee schedule in effect on the date the petition triggering
the investigation is filed, the date the accounting being reviewed is filed, or the due
date of any reviews mandated by law. A list of current fees is available from the
Court Investigators Office or the Family Law Clerk’s Office.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009;
amended effective January 1, 2010.)

b. PAYMENT OF COURT INVESTIGATOR FEES
Any and all assessments not waived by the court or county shall be paid to the court.

If an investigation is required because a petition has been filed, the investigation
shall not be undertaken unless and until the applicable investigation fee is paid,
unless otherwise ordered by the court. This includes, but is not limited to,
investigations necessitated by a petition for appointment of a temporary guardian,
appointment of a guardian, removal of a guardian, or termination of a guardianship.

For other court investigator services not triggered by the filing of a petition but still
required by law or court order, the assessed fee is payable within 30 days after the
Assessment and Order for Payment is mailed by the court. This includes, but is not
limited to, investigations necessitated by the mandatory periodic reviews in
guardianships.
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

c. DEFERMENT OR WAIVER OF COURT INVESTIGATOR FEES
Upon application by a guardian, a parent, or a ward, the court may defer or waive
a portion or all of the assessed court investigator fees if the court finds that ordering
payment of the assessed fees would constitute a hardship for the ward or the ward’s
estate pursuant to Probate Code section 1513.1. The court may also defer fees
pursuant to Probate Code section 2628. There shall be a rebuttable presumption
that the assessed court investigator fees constitute a hardship on a ward or proposed
ward if the proposed guardian qualifies for a fee waiver under Government Code
section 68630 et seq.

15-8

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART ONE: Guardianships

The court may periodically review the person’s ability to pay the assessed fee. If the court becomes aware of a change in circumstances permitting payment of the fees by the person, the court shall order the fees paid after notice to the person and an opportunity to be heard. (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 15.5 amended effective January 1, 2013; previously adopted as Rule 7.54 effective July 1, 1989; previously renumbered as Rule 7.56 effective July 1, 2008; previously readopted as Rule 15.5 effective July 1, 2009; amended effective January 1, 2010.)

15.6 TEMPORARY GUARDIANSHIPS

a. SETTING HEARING ON TEMPORARY GUARDIANSHIPS
Unless otherwise ordered by the court, hearings on temporary guardianships shall
normally be set within 21 days days from the date the petition for a temporary
guardianship is filed.
(Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2016; previous subd (a) adopted effective
July 1, 2009; previous subd (a) repealed effective January 1, 2013; amended
effective January 1, 2013.)

b. EX PARTE APPLICATIONS FOR ORDERS WAIVING OR SHORTENING NOTICE, OR
MODIFYING THE METHOD OF NOTICE
In addition to the Judicial Council and local forms required for temporary
guardianships, a petitioner seeking an ex parte order waiving or shortening notice
or modifying the method of notice of the hearing on the temporary guardianship
shall file an Ex Parte Application to Waive or Shorten Notice of Hearing on
Temporary Guardianship or Conservatorship (Solano County Local Form no.
3710).
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted effective January 1, 2013;
previous subd (b) repealed effective January 1, 2013.)

(Rule 15.6 amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted as Rule 7.57 effective July 1, 2008;
adopted effective July 1, 2009; amended effective January 1, 2013.)

15-9

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART ONE: Guardianships

15.7 EX PARTE APPLICATIONS FOR TEMPORARY GUARDIANSHIP OR OTHER TEMPORARY ORDERS [Repealed]

(Rule 15.7 repealed effective January 1, 2013; adopted as Rule 7.55 effective July 1988; renumbered as Rule 7.58 effective July 1, 2008; adopted as Rule 15.7 effective July 1, 2009.)

15.8 CONTESTED GUARDIANSHIPS

a. OBJECTIONS TO THE APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN
A person objecting to the appointment of a temporary or general guardian of the
person and/or estate are strongly encouraged to file and serve their objection on a
local form designated for that purpose as far in advance as possible of the
appropriate guardianship hearing date. If filing and service of the objection is not
possible prior to the hearing date, the objecting party shall appear at the hearing
either personally or through counsel to state their objection(s) on the record;
however, unless otherwise ordered by the court, appearance at the hearing does not
excuse the objecting party from filing his or her written objection and complying
with the service requirements in this rule.
(Subd (a) relettered and amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted as subd (b)
effective July 1, 2009; previous subd (a) repealed effective January 1, 2013.)

b. OBJECTOR’S NOMINATION OF ALTERNATE GUARDIAN
A person’s nomination of an alternate guardian for a proposed ward shall not be
considered unless and until a petition naming the alternate proposed guardian is
filed and the alternate proposed guardian indicates in writing that he or she consents
to the nomination. A petition filed under this rule shall be filed in the same case
number as the original petition. A petition filed pursuant to this rule is subject to
the same service and notice requirements as the original petition for guardianship.
(Subd (b) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2013; adopted as subd (c)
effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 15.8 amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted as Rule 7.56 effective July 1, 1988;
renumbered as Rule 7.59 effective July 1, 2008; adopted as Rule 15.8 effective July 1,
2009.)

15-10

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART ONE: Guardianships a. REQUEST FOR VISITATION ORDERS
A person seeking orders granting that person visitation with a ward shall file a
petition seeking visitation orders. The petition may be filed in pleading format or
may be filed on a Request for Order form (Judicial Council form FL-300). No
filing fee shall be charged for the Request for Order if it is filed in a guardianship
of the person only. (Gov. C. 70657(e).) Unless otherwise ordered by the court upon
proper application, the person shall provide notice of his or her petition as required
by Probate Code section 1511.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. DOCUMENTS TO BE SERVED
A person requesting visitation orders must have the following documents served on
any person who is entitled to notice of the petition for guardianship per Probate
Code section 1511 or by order of the court:

(1) A copy of the filed petition or Request for Order for visitation with any and
all attachments; and,

(2) Notice of Hearing – Guardianship or Conservatorship (Judicial Council
form GC-020).
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

c. PROOFS OF SERVICE; DECLARATIONS OF DUE DILIGENCE
A person requesting visitation shall file one or more proofs of service
demonstrating that all persons entitled to notice have been served as required. A
person who cannot locate or provide notice to a particular individual shall file a
declaration with the court explaining the person’s efforts to locate the individual.
(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

d. MEDIATION
If a dispute exists as to the request for visitation, the matter shall be referred to
mediation with Family Court Services. Mediations ordered as a result of this local
rule shall be subject to all provisions found in Chapter 11 (commencing with Family
Code section 3160) of Part 3 of Division 8 of the Family Code, all applicable
provisions in the California Rules of Court, and Solano County Local Rules, rule
5.20.
(Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15-11

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART ONE: Guardianships

e. ORDERS FOR VISITATION
Stipulations between the parties for visitation between a ward and another
individual shall be prepared as a pleading or on a form designated by the court for
use in guardianship matters. All other court orders concerning visitation with a
ward shall be prepared and filed as a pleading or on a form designated by the court
for use in guardianship matters.
(Subd (e) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 15.9 amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted as Rule 7.60 effective July 1, 2008;
adopted as Rule 15.9 effective July 1, 2009.)

15.10 GUARDIANSHIPS OF THE ESTATE

a. INVENTORIES AND APPRAISALS
In order to ensure compliance with the guardian’s obligation to file an inventory
and appraisal, the court will ordinarily set a review hearing to take place four (4)
months after the date of appointment of a guardian of the estate or a guardian of the
person and estate. The date of the initial compliance review hearing shall be listed
as part of the order appointing the guardian. For good cause shown, the court may
dispense with setting this review hearing.

The guardian shall file the inventory and appraisal required by Probate Code section
2610 at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of the review hearing concerning that
inventory and appraisal. The guardian shall serve an exact copy of the inventory
and appraisal on the Court Investigators Office, if the inventory is in a relative
guardianship of the estate, or on the Solano County Department of Health & Social
Services, if the inventory is in a non-relative guardianship of the estate.

A person who files an objection to the inventory and appraisal of a guardian shall
timely serve a notice of hearing on the Court Investigators Office, if the inventory
and appraisal is in a relative guardianship of the estate, or on the Solano County
Department of Health & Social Services, if the inventory and appraisal is in a non-
relative guardianship of the estate. This notice of hearing shall only be required for
a hearing set by the objecting party that is not already on calendar. No notice of
the hearing is required for the review hearings set automatically by the court.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15-12

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART ONE: Guardianships

b. ACCOUNTINGS
In order to ensure compliance with the guardian’s obligation to file an accounting,
the court will ordinarily set a review hearing to take place fifteen (15) months after
the date of appointment of a guardian of the estate or a guardian of the person and
estate. The date of the compliance review hearing shall be listed as part of the
order appointing the guardian. For good cause shown, the court may dispense with
setting this review hearing in individual cases. The court may set additional review
hearings as needed for the initial and any subsequent accounts.

The guardian shall file the accounting at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of
the review hearing concerning that accounting. The guardian shall serve an exact
copy of the accounting on the Court Investigators Office, if the accounting is in a
relative guardianship of the estate, or on the Solano County Department of Health
& Social Services, if the accounting is in a non-relative guardianship of the estate.

Absent a court order to the contrary, any subsequent accountings shall likewise be
filed and served at least 30 days prior to any subsequent compliance review
hearings.
(Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2013; previous subd (b) repealed effective
January 1, 2013.)

c. INVESTMENTS
If a request for special notice has not been filed, a petition seeking court
authorization to invest may be heard without notice. The emergency order
procedure set out in Local Rule 5.4 shall apply.
(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 15.10 amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted as Rule 7.59 effective July 1,
1992; renumbered as Rule 7.61 effective July 1, 2008; adopted as Rule 15.10 effective July
1, 2009.)

15.11 GUARDIANSHIPS OF THE PERSON

a. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
The court may order on a case-by-case basis that a guardian of the person or a
guardian of the person and estate shall comply with the annual status report
requirement per Probate Code section 1513.2.
(Subd (a) relettered effective January 1, 2013.)

15-13

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART ONE: Guardianships

(Rule 15.11 renumbered effective January 1, 2013; adopted as Rule 15.17 effective January 1, 2010; previous Rule 15.11 repealed effective January 1, 2013.)

15.12 ALLOWANCE OF FEES IN GUARDIANSHIP PROCEEDINGS [Repealed]

(Rule 15.12 repealed effective January 1, 2013; adopted as Rule 7.63 effective July 1, 1989; adopted as Rule 15.12 effective July 1, 2009.)

15.13 INVESTMENTS BY GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE [Repealed]

(Rule 15.13 repealed effective January 1, 2013; adopted as Rule 7.64 effective July 1, 1988; adopted as Rule 15.13 effective July 1, 2009.)

15.14 APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FOR WARD

a. ELIGIBILITY FOR INITIAL APPOINTMENT
An attorney wishing to be considered for appointment on any guardianship case on
or after January 1, 2008, must comply with California Rules of Court, rule 7.1101,
and submit a request to the court to be placed on the panel of appointed attorneys
in guardianship cases. The request must be accompanied by a Certification of
Attorney Concerning Qualifications For Court Appointment in Conservatorships
or Guardianships (Judicial Council form GC-010). An attorney whose request is
approved by the court is thereafter eligible for appointment in guardianship cases.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. RENEWAL OF ELIGIBILITY FOR APPOINTMENT
An attorney who is eligible for appointment in guardianship cases pursuant to rule
15.14, subdivision (a), shall certify to the court by March 31 of each year following
the attorney’s initial approval that he or she has completed the education
requirements set forth in California Rules of Court, rule 7.1101. The certification
shall be on the Annual Certification of Court-Appointed Attorney form (Judicial
Council form GC-011). Failure to timely comply with the certification
requirements or with the education requirements in rule 7.1101 shall result in the
removal of the attorney from the approved panel of appointed attorneys; however,
the court may reinstate the attorney upon the prompt filing of an affidavit to the
court demonstrating good cause why the certification was not timely submitted to
the court.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15-14

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART ONE: Guardianships

c. STANDARDS GOVERNING COUNSEL FOR WARD
Counsel appointed to represent a ward in a guardianship proceeding shall be subject
to, and shall have all applicable rights and responsibilities found in, California
Rules of Court, rule 5.242.
(Subd (c) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

d. COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL FOR WARD
Compensation of counsel appointed to represent a ward shall be governed by
Probate Code section 1470. All orders appointing minor’s counsel in guardianship
proceedings, including orders setting compensation, shall be on an Order
Appointing Minor’s Counsel form (Solano County Local Form no. 3750).
(Subd (d) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 15.14 adopted effective July 1, 2009; adopted as Rule 7.65 effective July 1, 2008.)

15.15 TERMINATION OF GUARDIANSHIP

a. FORMS TO BE FILED FOR TERMINATION OF GUARDIANSHIP
A party wishing to terminate a guardianship for a ward who is not deceased or
emancipated must file the following forms:
(1) Notice of Hearing – Guardianship or Conservatorship (Judicial Council
form GC-020);
(2) Petition for Termination of Guardianship (Judicial Council form GC-255);
and,
(3) Order Terminating Guardianship (Judicial Council form GC-260).
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. NOTICE OF THE PETITION TO TERMINATE
In addition to complying with the service and notice requirements set by law, a
person filing a petition to terminate the guardianship shall also serve a copy of the
petition and the Notice of Hearing on the Court Investigators Office, if the
guardianship to be terminated is a relative guardianship, or on the Solano County
Department of Health & Social Services, if the guardianship to be terminated is a
non-relative guardianship.
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

c. LODGING OF ORDER TERMINATING GUARDIANSHIP
In the event the court makes custody orders as part of an order terminating a
guardianship pursuant to Probate Code section 1601, a copy of the custody order

15-15

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART ONE: Guardianships

shall be filed in any pending or subsequently commenced proceeding concerning custody of the child. The custody order shall be prepared as a pleading or on a form designated by the court for use pursuant to this rule. (Subd (c) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 15.15 amended effective January 1, 2013; adopted as Rule 7.81 effective July 1, 1988; renumbered as Rule 7.66 effective July 1, 2008; adopted as Rule 15.15 effective July 1, 2009.)

15.16 SANCTIONS

Failure to comply with these local rules in guardianship matters may result in the imposition of sanctions pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 575.2.

(Rule 15.16 adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15.17 GUARDIANSHIPS OF THE PERSON – STATUS REPORT [Repealed]

(Rule 15.17 repealed effective January 1, 2013; adopted effective January 1, 2010.)

15.18 – 15.49 [RESERVED]

15-16

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART TWO: Conservatorships

15.50 CONSERVATORSHIP MATTERS TO WHICH RULE 15 APPLIES

Unless otherwise stated in an individual rule, Part Two of Rule 15 shall apply to all
conservatorship matters brought pursuant to the Probate Code. It does not apply to LPS
conservatorships brought pursuant to Welfare & Institutions Code section 5000 et seq.

(Rule 15.50 adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15.51 CONTINUANCE OF HEARING WHERE CONSERVATEE NOT SERVED WITH CITATION

If the proposed conservatee has not been served with the citation as required by Probate Code section 1824, the petitioner shall notify the court and all persons entitled to notice at least 15 days prior to the hearing and request a new hearing date. The original citation shall be filed showing no service and an amended citation shall be issued with the new hearing date. The petitioner shall also serve a notice to all interested persons of the new hearing date.

(Rule 15.51 adopted effective July 1, 2009; previously adopted as portion of Rule 7.69 effective July 1, 1988.)

15.52 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPOSED CONSERVATORS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF LETTERS

a. Pursuant to Probate Code section 1834, subsection (b), Solano County requires that
a conservator provide the court with the conservator’s Social Security number and
driver’s license numbers. A conservator shall be deemed to have complied with
this requirement by submitting a fully completed and signed Confidential
Conservator Screening Form (Judicial Council form GC-314) to the Court
Investigators Office as part of the initial conservatorship investigation process.
This requirement shall not apply to the Public Guardian.
(Subd. (a) relettered and amended effective July 1, 2011.)

b. All proposed conservators shall view the video With Heart: Understanding
Conservatorships, prior to the initial hearing on the petition, and shall file an
affidavit under penalty of perjury stating they have complied with this requirement.
This requirement shall not apply to the Public Guardian.
(Subd. (b) adopted effective July 1, 2011.)

15-17

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART TWO: Conservatorships

(Rule 15.52 amended effective July 1, 2011; previously adopted as portion of Rule 7.69 effective July 1, 1988; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15.53 COURT INVESTIGATOR

a. AUTOMATIC APPOINTMENT OF COURT INVESTIGATOR
The court automatically appoints the court investigator to conduct investigations
into probate conservatorships and proposed probate conservatorships.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS ON COURT INVESTIGATOR UPON COMMENCEMENT OF
THE PROCEEDING
Immediately upon the filing of a Petition for Appointment of Temporary
Conservator or Petition for Appointment of Probate Conservator, the petitioner or
the petitioner's attorney must submit the following documents to the Court
Investigators Office:
(1) Notice of Hearing – Guardianship or Conservatorship (Judicial Council
form GC-020);
(2) A copy of the Petition for Appointment of Probate Conservator (Judicial
Council form GC-311);
(3) A copy of the Petition for Appointment of Temporary Conservator (Judicial
Council form GC-111), if one was filed; and,
(4) The Confidential Conservator Screening Form (Judicial Council form GC-
314).

The documents shall be delivered or mailed to:
Court Investigators Office
Superior Court of California, County of Solano
600 Union Avenue
Fairfield, California 94533
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

c. SERVICE OF PETITIONS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS ON COURT INVESTIGATOR
AFTER APPOINTMENT OF CONSERVATOR
A copy of any pleadings or documents filed in the court file shall be immediately
provided to the Court Investigators Office by the party or attorney filing said
pleadings or documents.
(Subd (c) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15-18

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART TWO: Conservatorships

d. DUTY TO UPDATE INFORMATION GIVEN TO INVESTIGATOR
The petitioner must advise the investigating office of any changes to the contact
information of the conservatee or proposed conservatee.
(Subd (d) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

e. DUTY TO COOPERATE WITH INVESTIGATOR
All parties, including but not limited to the petitioner, proposed or appointed
conservator, conservatee or proposed conservatee, and any attorneys for the parties,
including appointed counsel for the conservatee or proposed conservatee, are to
cooperate fully with the appointed investigator. Failure to cooperate may be
punishable with sanctions pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 575.2, in the
court’s discretion.
(Subd (e) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

f. SERVICE OF SUBPOENA ON COURT INVESTIGATOR
Any subpoena to compel a court investigator’s presence at a hearing or trial must
be served in compliance with Government Code sections 68097.1 and 68097.2.
Said subpoena shall be served personally on the court investigator, on the Court
Executive Officer, or an agent designated by the Court Executive Officer, during
the court’s normal business hours. The subpoena shall be accompanied by payment
in the amount required by Government Code section 68097.2 for each day that the
court investigator is required to remain in attendance at the hearing or trial pursuant
to the subpoena; otherwise, the subpoena shall not be accepted or service deemed
complete.

In order to give the court investigator reasonable time for preparation, the
subpoenaing party shall serve the subpoena a minimum of 10 court days prior to
the first date the court investigator is to appear at the hearing or trial, unless the
court investigator agrees to a shorter period of time.
(Subd (f) amended effective July 1, 2016; adopted effective January 1, 2012.)

(Rule 15.53 amended effective July 1, 2016; previously adopted as Rule 7.70 effective
July 1, 1988; adopted as Rule 15.53 effective July 1, 2009; previously amended effective
January 1, 2012.)

15-19

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART TWO: Conservatorships a. COURT INVESTIGATOR FEES GENERALLY
A fee for the services of the Court Investigators Office shall be imposed upon the
person(s) so responsible for payment per Probate Code section 1851.5. The rate of
this fee depends on the nature of the investigation and is determined by the court
on an annual basis. All rates are subject to change. The amount of the fee payable
shall be determined by the fee schedule in effect on the date the petition triggering
the investigation is filed, the date the accounting being reviewed is filed, or the due
date of any reviews mandated by law. A list of current fees is available from the
Court Investigators Office or the Family Law Clerk’s Office. The assessed fee is
payable within 30 days after the Assessment and Order for Payment is mailed by
the Court Investigators Office.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. PAYMENT OF COURT INVESTIGATOR FEES
Any and all assessments not waived by the court shall be paid to the court.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

c. DEFERRAL OR WAIVER OF COURT INVESTIGATOR FEES
Upon application by the conservator or proposed conservator or the conservatee or
proposed conservatee, the court may defer or waive a portion or all of the assessed
court investigator fees if the court finds that ordering payment of the assessed fees
at the time of the assessment would constitute a hardship for the conservatee or
conservatee’s estate pursuant to Probate Code section 1851.5. The court may also
defer fees pursuant to Probate Code section 2628. There shall be a rebuttable
presumption that the assessed court investigator fees constitute a hardship on a
conservatee or proposed conservatee if the conservatee qualifies for a fee waiver
under Government Code section 68630 et seq. The court shall review the
conservatee’s ability to pay the assessed fee at every review of the conservatorship.
If the court finds the conservatee is able to pay the fee at the time of a review, or if
the court otherwise becomes aware of a change in circumstances permitting
payment of the fees by the conservatee, the court shall order the fees paid.
(Subd (c) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 15.54 amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15-20

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART TWO: Conservatorships a. ELIGIBILITY FOR INITIAL APPOINTMENT
An attorney wishing to be considered for appointment on any conservatorship case
on or after January 1, 2008, must comply with California Rules of Court, rule
7.1101, and submit a request to the court to be placed on the panel of appointed
attorneys in conservatorship cases. The request must be accompanied by a
Certification of Attorney Concerning Qualifications For Court Appointment in
Conservatorships or Guardianships (Judicial Council form GC-010). An attorney
whose application is approved by the court is thereafter eligible for appointment in
conservatorship cases.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. RENEWAL OF ELIGIBILITY FOR APPOINTMENT
An attorney who is eligible for appointment in conservatorship cases pursuant to
rule 15.55, subdivision (a), shall certify to the court by March 31 of each year
following the attorney’s initial approval that he or she has completed the education
requirements set forth in California Rules of Court, rule 7.1101. The certification
shall be on the Annual Certification of Court-Appointed Attorney form (Judicial
Council form GC-011). Failure to timely comply with the certification
requirements or with the education requirements in rule 7.1101 shall result in the
removal of the attorney from the approved panel of appointed attorneys; however,
the court may reinstate the attorney upon the prompt filing of an affidavit to the
court demonstrating good cause why the certification was not timely submitted to
the court.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

c. COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL
Compensation of counsel appointed to represent a conservatee shall be governed
by Probate Code section 1470.
(Subd (c) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 15.55 adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15-21

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART TWO: Conservatorships

15.56 TEMPORARY CONSERVATORSHIPS; EX PARTE PETITIONS FOR TEMPORARY CONSERVATORSHIP AND OTHER ORDERS; WAIVER OF NOTICE REQUIREMENTS

a. EX PARTE APPLICATIONS GENERALLY
Ex parte applications are extraordinary remedies. Except as set forth in an
individual rule, ex parte applications for a temporary conservatorship of either the
estate or the person, or for temporary orders pertaining to an existing
conservatorship, are appropriate only where the applicant makes a showing per
California Rules of Court, rule 7.1062 that an exception to the notice requirements
is necessary to protect the conservatee or the proposed conservatee or his or her
estate from immediate and substantial harm.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. EX PARTE PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF A TEMPORARY CONSERVATOR
Unless the petitioner makes a showing of immediate and substantial harm or other
good cause for an ex parte granting of a temporary conservatorship per California
Rules of Court, rule 7.1062, the court ordinarily will not entertain an ex parte
application for appointment of a temporary conservator, even where all those
entitled to notice have joined in the petition. In cases where the court determines
that immediate appointment of a temporary conservator is necessary, said
appointment shall be governed by the provisions of Probate Code section 2250.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

c. EX PARTE NOTICE REQUIREMENTS

(1) Before submitting an ex parte application for the court's consideration, the
applicant shall comply with the procedures in Probate Code section 1051,
California Rules of Court, rule 7.55, and all applicable local rules. Unless
otherwise stated in the Solano County Local Rules, the applicant must
comply with all requirements for a declaration setting forth that notice of
the ex parte request has been given to all required persons or the reason
notice has not been given. At the time of submission of the application, a
completed Declaration Re Notice Upon Ex Parte Application for Orders –
Conservatorships (Solano County Local Form no. 1070-C) or a declaration
in substantial compliance therewith, shall accompany all applications for ex
parte orders and shall be filed before the ex parte hearing. The moving party
shall make available a copy of the filed Declaration Re Notice Upon Ex
Parte Application for Orders to the judicial officer, and to the opposing

15-22

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART TWO: Conservatorships

party or attorney if one appears, at the time of the ex parte hearing, or the
ex parte hearing may be ordered rescheduled.
(Subd (1) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(2) Unless otherwise ordered by the court, notice of the ex parte application for
temporary orders shall be given by the petitioner to all those who are entitled
to notice per Probate Code section 2250, subsection (e). The notice shall
include the date, time, and place the request will be made, a summary of the
relief requested, and the facts upon which the request will be made. In its
discretion, the court may require that the entire moving papers package be
served in a prescribed manner upon another party, interested person, or his
or her attorney, at a specified time before the ex parte hearing. Notice may
be excused pursuant to these rules.
(Subd (2) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Subd (c) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

d. DECLARATION OF DUE DILIGENCE If a petitioner cannot locate a relative or other person for whom notice is required, the petitioner shall file a Declaration of Due Diligence (Solano County Local Form no. 3705) or a substantially equivalent declaration which complies with this rule. The declaration must specify the name of the relative or other person whose whereabouts are unknown, the last known address of the person, the approximate date when the person was last known to reside at that address, all efforts undertaken to identify and locate the person, and any facts that explain why the person cannot be located. At a minimum, the petitioner shall make all of the following efforts and state the results in the declaration: (1) Search the public records in any county where the person was last known or believed to reside, including real and personal property indexes in the recorder’s and assessor’s offices, the local telephone directory and directory assistance, the county’s voter registration, the county’s vital statistics office, and any non-confidential court files concerning or involving the person; (2) Search all appropriate Internet search engines; (3) Inquiry of the person’s current or former employer(s); (4) Inquiry of the person’s current or former landlord(s) and neighbors; (5) Inquiry of the person’s last known residential address and any neighbors of that address; (6) Inquiry of any relatives, friends, or other individuals who might have knowledge of the person’s whereabouts; and,

15-23

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART TWO: Conservatorships

(7) Inquiry of any appropriate county, state, and federal correctional systems in
which the petitioner believes or has reason to believe the person is or may
be incarcerated.
(Subd (d) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

e. ORDER DISPENSING WITH NOTICE
A petitioner seeking an order dispensing with notice for one or more persons shall
submit an Order Dispensing with Notice (Judicial Council form GC-021) to the
court prior to or at the hearing on the petition for conservatorship. The court will
not grant an order dispensing with notice unless the petitioner has filed a
Declaration of Due Diligence pursuant to Solano County Local Rules, rule 15.56,
subdivision (d).
(Subd (e) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 15.56 adopted effective July 1, 2009; previously adopted as Rule 7.71 effective July
1, 1988.

15.57 INDEPENDENT EXERCISE OF POWERS

No powers specified in Probate Code Section 2591 will be granted in the absence of a clear and convincing factual showing that the grant of each power requested is needed to administer the estate, and that the grant of such power is for the advantage, benefit and best interest of the estate.

(Rule 15.57 adopted effective July 1, 2009; previously adopted as Rule 7.73 effective July 1, 1988.)

15.58 CONSERVATORSHIP INVENTORIES AND APPRAISALS

a. INVENTORIES AND APPRAISALS GENERALLY
Inventories and appraisals in conservatorships of the estate are governed by Chapter
7 of Part 4 of Division 4 of the Probate Code (commencing with section 2600). The
use of mandatory Judicial Council forms is required, and the use of optional Judicial
Council forms is strongly encouraged, in the preparation of all inventories and
appraisals.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15-24

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART TWO: Conservatorships

b. REVIEW HEARING FOR INVENTORIES AND APPRAISALS
At the time of the appointment of a conservator of the estate or a conservator of the
person and the estate, the court shall set a review hearing to take place four (4)
months after the date of appointment. The date of the initial compliance review
hearing shall be listed as part of the order appointing the conservator. The court
may set additional review hearings as needed for the initial and any subsequent
inventories and appraisals.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

c. FILING OF INVENTORIES AND APPRAISALS
The conservator shall file the inventory and appraisal required by Probate Code
section 2610 at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of the review hearing set
pursuant to Rule 15.58, subsection (b).
(Subd (c) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

d. SERVICE OF INVENTORIES AND APPRAISALS
At the time that the conservator of the estate presents an inventory and appraisal to
the court pursuant to Probate Code sections 2610 or 2620 or any other section of
the Probate Code, the conservator shall also serve an exact copy of the inventory
and appraisal on the Court Investigators Office.
(Subd (d) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

e. SERVICE OF NOTICE OF HEARING ON OBJECTIONS TO INVENTORIES AND
APPRAISALS
A person who files an objection to the inventory or appraisal of a conservator shall
timely serve a notice of hearing on the Court Investigators Office. This notice of
hearing shall only be required for a hearing set by the objecting party that is not
already on calendar. No notice of the hearing is required for the review hearings
set automatically by the court.
(Subd (e) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 15.58 adopted effective July 1, 2009; previously adopted as Rule 7.75 effective July
1, 1988.)

15.59 CONSERVATORSHIP ACCOUNTINGS

a. ACCOUNTINGS GENERALLY
Accountings in conservatorships of the estate are governed by Chapter 7 of Part 4
of Division 4 of the Probate Code (commencing with section 2600). The use of

15-25

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART TWO: Conservatorships

mandatory Judicial Council forms is required, and the use of optional Judicial
Council forms is strongly encouraged, in the preparation of all accountings.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT TO ACCOMPANY ACCOUNTING
In addition to the information required by Probate Code section 2620, each
accounting shall include a report containing the following information:

(1) An explanation of any unusual items appearing in the account;

(2) A report of the stewardship of the fiduciary in the management of the assets
of the conservatee's estate during the period covered by the account;

(3) In cases where a bond has been ordered, a statement attesting that bond
premiums have been paid regularly; and,

(4) If income-producing property is inventoried in the conservatorship and the
account fails to indicate that income is being produced by the property, an
explanation as to the lack of income.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

c. REVIEW HEARING FOR ACCOUNTINGS
At the time of the appointment of a conservator of the estate or a conservator of the
person and the estate, the court shall set a review hearing to take place fifteen (15)
months after the date of appointment. The date of the compliance review hearing
shall be listed as part of the order appointing the conservator. The court may set
additional review hearings as needed concerning the initial or subsequent
accountings.
(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

d. FILING OF ACCOUNTINGS
The conservator shall file the accounting required by Probate Code section 2620 at
least thirty (30) days prior to the date of the review hearing set pursuant to Rule
15.59, subsection (c), concerning that accounting.
(Subd (d) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

e. SERVICE OF ACCOUNTINGS
At the time that the conservator of the estate presents an accounting to the court
pursuant to Probate Code section 2620 et seq. or any other section of the Probate

15-26

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART TWO: Conservatorships

Code, the conservator shall also serve an exact copy of the inventory on the Court
Investigators Office. Said service shall be at least thirty (30) days prior to the date
of the review hearing set pursuant to Rule 15.59, subsection (c). Absent a court
order to the contrary, any subsequent accountings shall likewise be filed and served
on the Court Investigators Office at least 30 days prior to any subsequent
compliance review hearings.
(Subd (e) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

f. SERVICE OF NOTICE OF HEARING ON OBJECTIONS TO ACCOUNTINGS
A person who files an objection to the accounting of a conservator shall timely
serve a notice of hearing on the Court Investigators Office. This notice of hearing
shall only be required for a hearing set by the objecting party that is not already on
calendar. No notice of the hearing is required for the review hearings set
automatically by the court.
(Subd (f) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 15.59 amended effective January 1, 2012; previously adopted as Rule 7.76 effective
July 1, 1988; adopted as Rule 15.59 effective July 1, 2009.)

15.60 ALLOWANCE OF FEES

a. GUIDELINES FOR COMPENSATION
A conservator of the estate or the person and/or his or her attorney may petition the
court for just and reasonable compensation in accordance with Probate Code
sections 2640 and 2642. In determining whether to award compensation, the court
shall take into consideration the following:
(1) The nature and difficulty of the services rendered to the conservatee and/or
the conservatee’s estate;
(2) The results achieved from those services;
(3) The benefit to the conservatee and/or the conservatee’s estate of those
services;
(4) The productivity of the conservator’s and/or attorney’s time spent in
performing the services;
(5) The expertise and experience of the person requesting the fees;
(6) The hourly rate of the person performing the services; and,
(7) The total amount of compensation requested in relation to size and income
of the conservatee’s estate, if applicable.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15-27

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART TWO: Conservatorships

b. COMPENSATION OF CONSERVATOR OR CONSERVATOR’S ATTORNEY FROM
TRUST OR OTHER SOURCE
If a conservatee is also the beneficiary of a trust and the compensation of a
conservator of the person or estate, or his or her attorney, is sought from the trust
or other source in part or in whole, the conservator shall first seek approval of the
compensation in the conservatorship matter. The petition shall include a
declaration by the trustee as to whether there are sufficient funds in the trust to
allow for the compensation sought. If the conservatorship of the estate has
sufficient funds to pay for the requested compensation, the conservator shall
explain why compensation is sought from the trust and not the estate. A conservator
or a conservator’s attorney shall not accept compensation for work done in a
conservatorship matter without a court order approving said compensation by the
judge assigned to hear the conservatorship matter.
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2012; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

(Rule 15.60 amended effective January 1, 2012; previously adopted as Rule 7.78 effective
July 1, 1988; adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15.61 ORDERS FOR SUPPORT AND SUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT

a. SUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT

(1) Prior court approval is required for any action specified in Probate Code
Section 2580, et seq., such as making gifts or establishing trusts.

(2) A clear factual showing as required by Probate Code Section 2583 must be
presented to the court before the matter will be considered.

(3) Notice must be given under Probate Code Section 2581, and such notice
may require a prior order dispensing with notice to some persons.

(Rule 15.61 adopted effective July 1, 2009; previously adopted as Rule 7.79 effective July
1, 1988.)

15.62 PAYMENTS TO CAREGIVER SPOUSE OF CONSERVATEE

In an account or report indicating that a conservatee’s spouse was hired to provide caregiver services to conservatee, the conservator shall provide the following information:

15-28

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017

Superior Court of California County of Solano

Rule 15 – Guardianships and Conservatorships

PART TWO: Conservatorships

(1) A description of the services rendered by the spouse that are above and beyond the
care normally provided by one spouse to another.
(2) A description of the special skills possessed by the spouse enabling him or her to
perform these services.
(3) The benefit to the conservatee of having his or her spouse perform the services
instead of a professional caregiver.
(4) The hours worked by the spouse.
(5) The hourly rate being paid to the spouse and a justification of that rate. Justification
may include a comparison to the rate charged by a professional for the same or
similar services.
(6) Whether caregiving services are being provided through IHSS and if so, the
frequency and type of the services provided.
(7) Whether insurance is in place to cover the caregiver spouse in case of injury and if
so, the amount of the periodic premium being paid by the spouse or the conservator.

(Rule 15.62 adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15.63 TERMINATION OF CONSERVATORSHIP

a. NOTIFICATION OF CONSERVATEE’S DEATH
The conservator shall file a declaration with the court within 30 days of the
conservatee’s death, indicating the date of death, place of death and whether the
conservatee died testate or intestate. If the conservatee died testate, the conservator
shall notify the conservatee’s nominated executor within 30 days of the
conservatee’s death, unless the will fails to nominate an executor or the conservator
is the nominated executor.
(Subd (a) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

b. TERMINATION OF CONSERVATORSHIP FOR REASONS OTHER THAN DEATH OF
CONSERVATEE
Termination of a conservatorship for reasons other than the death of the conservatee
shall be by noticed petition pursuant to Probate Code sections 1580 et seq., 1860 et
seq., or 2626. The filing of a certification of competency issued by the
superintendent of a state hospital pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code Section
7357, or other provisions of law, does not by itself terminate a conservatorship.
(Subd (b) adopted effective July 1, 2009.)

15-29

www.solano.courts.ca.gov July 2017