Tuolumne — Probate Notes for February 27, 2026

Source: https://www.tuolumne.courts.ca.gov/system/files/general/pb_d5_02272026.pdf

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 8:30 am DA Case # Date Filed

1 PR12559 Estate of Cathi Kay Nies 12/05/2024

Jennifer E Nies Attorney: William Coffill

Cathi Kay Nies

Review Hearing - Report - Probate Code 12200

12/05/2024 Petition File Tracking 01/30/2025 High Density

Probate Notes are not tentative rulings. Parties and counsel are expected to appear for the hearings unless this note indicates that “no appearance is
necessary.” Unless a personal appearance is required, all participants may appear via Zoom without first securing Court permission using this link:
https://tuolumne-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1615813960?pwd=NTRMT0NwMDg5cnlYdzZ6VnBXWWFsUT09. [Meeting ID: 161 581 3960; Passcode:
123456]. All matters set for hearing in Department 5 are presumptively assigned to that department for all purposes. Parties retain the right under Cal.
Const. art VI §21 to decline consent to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem. By participating in the first hearing, or electing not to attend after due
notice thereof, parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem for the entire case. See CRC 2.816.

No appearance is necessary.

This is the §12200 review hearing which ought to have been taken off-calendar following this Court’s order granting the petition for final distribution back on 11.07.2025.

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 8:30 am DA Case # Date Filed

2 PR12742 Estate of Donna Proulx 01/14/2026

Tianne Proulx Attorney: Jason Pink

Donna Proulx

Letters of Administration

01/14/2026 Petition File Tracking 01/14/2026 LP Labels Needed

Probate Notes are not tentative rulings. Parties and counsel are expected to appear for the hearings unless this note indicates that “no appearance is
necessary.” Unless a personal appearance is required, all participants may appear via Zoom without first securing Court permission using this link:
https://tuolumne-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1615813960?pwd=NTRMT0NwMDg5cnlYdzZ6VnBXWWFsUT09. [Meeting ID: 161 581 3960; Passcode:
123456]. All matters set for hearing in Department 5 are presumptively assigned to that department for all purposes. Parties retain the right under Cal.
Const. art VI §21 to decline consent to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem. By participating in the first hearing, or electing not to attend after due
notice thereof, parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem for the entire case. See CRC 2.816.

This is the initial hearing on a petition to issue letters of administration for an intestate estate. The petition identifies three likely intestate heirs: the petitioner, and two apparent siblings. The Notice of Hearing only includes one of those siblings, which begs the question whether Lenee was given notice. There are also two different addresses provided for Jacon, which makes notice unclear. Moreover, the fact that petitioner is offering to provide a bond for a modest intestate estate to be split amongst siblings raises some question as to why the siblings did not agree to waive bond to avoid that expense. Petitioner does not have nominations from her siblings, and while she is not required to have those, the absence of a nomination or bond waiver raises the specter of conflict.

Petitioner to advise.

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 8:30 am DA Case # Date Filed

3 PR12743 Estate of Joanne D Knowles 01/14/2026

Laurel Rimon Attorney: Tamara Polley

Joanne D Knowles

Probate Will/Issue Letters

01/14/2026 Petition File Tracking 01/14/2026 LP Labels Needed

Probate Notes are not tentative rulings. Parties and counsel are expected to appear for the hearings unless this note indicates that “no appearance is
necessary.” Unless a personal appearance is required, all participants may appear via Zoom without first securing Court permission using this link:
https://tuolumne-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1615813960?pwd=NTRMT0NwMDg5cnlYdzZ6VnBXWWFsUT09. [Meeting ID: 161 581 3960; Passcode: 123456].
All matters set for hearing in Department 5 are presumptively assigned to that department for all purposes. Parties retain the right under Cal. Const. art VI §21 to
decline consent to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem. By participating in the first hearing, or electing not to attend after due notice thereof, parties
are deemed to have stipulated to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem for the entire case. See CRC 2.816.

This is the initial hearing on a petition to admit decedent’s lost will to probate, and to appoint her

nominee to serve as executor thereof. This Court makes the following general observations:

1. Given that the proposed will includes an express bond waiver for this particular nominee,
this Court does not foresee exercising its discretion under §8571 to require a bond just
because the nominee is a non-residence of the State of California. Some basis for
believing a bond is needed would necessitate that kind of discretionary exercise.

2. Since petitioner apparently intends to serve as both executor and successor trustor,
§1208(b) requires notice to “each person to whom income or principal would be required or
authorized in the trustee's discretion to be currently distributed if the trust were in effect.”
Petitioner did not attach a copy of the trust instrument, and did not provide a declaration
stating the list of persons in the trust entitled to a distribution. As such, this Court is not in
a position to determine whether adequate notice has been given.

3. Regarding the will itself, it may generally be proven in the same manner and at the same
quantum of proof as any other will, with the exception of an adverse presumption that it
was revoked (see §§ 6124, 8223). Court will need subscribing witness attestations
(§8200), a declaration from someone with personal knowledge that the photocopy
accurately represents the terms set forth in the original (Lauermann v. Superior Court
(2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1327), and a statement from someone with personal knowledge
explaining the diligent search performed, where decedent kept important documents, and
denial of presumed destruction. See §6120(b) and Estate of Trikha (2013) 219
Cal.App.4th 791. Since it appears that distribution out of the trust differs from intestacy,
this Court must permit sufficient time for those presumably aggrieved to be heard. If there
is a challenge to the lost will, current counsel may need to withdraw. See CPRC 3.7.

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 8:30 am DA Case # Date Filed

4 PR12608 Estate of John Jerome Ferles 02/28/2025

Joshua Ferles Pro Per

Review Hearing - Inventory and Appraisal

FURTHER

02/28/2025 Petition File Tracking 03/17/2025 High Density

Probate Notes are not tentative rulings. Parties and counsel are expected to appear for the hearings unless this note indicates that “no appearance is
necessary.” Unless a personal appearance is required, all participants may appear via Zoom without first securing Court permission using this link:
https://tuolumne-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1615813960?pwd=NTRMT0NwMDg5cnlYdzZ6VnBXWWFsUT09. [Meeting ID: 161 581 3960; Passcode:
123456]. All matters set for hearing in Department 5 are presumptively assigned to that department for all purposes. Parties retain the right under Cal.
Const. art VI §21 to decline consent to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem. By participating in the first hearing, or electing not to attend after due
notice thereof, parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem for the entire case. See CRC 2.816.

This is a continued review hearing regarding the overdue I&A for this estate. While the petition indicates (at Para 3.d.) close to $300,000 in assets, petitioner informs this Court that the estate consists mostly of personal memorabilia. Petitioner was reminded of the need to comply with court requirements even if he wishes to represent himself.

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 8:30 am DA Case # Date Filed

5 PR12566 Estate of Shelly Lynn Desgeorges 12/24/2024

Shelly Lynn Desgeorges

Jessica Glenn Attorney: Brandon Meyer

Review Hearing - Report - Probate Code 12200

12/24/2024 Petition File Tracking 02/11/2025 High Density

Probate Notes are not tentative rulings. Parties and counsel are expected to appear for the hearings unless this note indicates that “no appearance is
necessary.” Unless a personal appearance is required, all participants may appear via Zoom without first securing Court permission using this link:
https://tuolumne-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1615813960?pwd=NTRMT0NwMDg5cnlYdzZ6VnBXWWFsUT09. [Meeting ID: 161 581 3960; Passcode: 123456].
All matters set for hearing in Department 5 are presumptively assigned to that department for all purposes. Parties retain the right under Cal. Const. art VI §21 to
decline consent to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem. By participating in the first hearing, or electing not to attend after due notice thereof, parties
are deemed to have stipulated to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem for the entire case. See CRC 2.816.

No appearance is necessary. The Court, having received and reviewed petitioner’s TUO-PR-125, intends to find by a preponderance of the evidence that good cause exists to extend the period of administration for this estate in order to liquidate the anchor asset and remove the current squatter.

A §12200 review hearing will be set for 05/15/2026 at 8:30 a.m.

Petitioner is directed to give notice to her co-heir that failure to cooperate with petitioner’s efforts to safeguard assets may result in a surcharge against the heir’s interest (see §§ 9613, 9657, 9820(a).

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 8:30 am DA Case # Date Filed

6 PR12752 Guardianship of Valen Emil Miller 02/04/2026

Carol Cashen Pro Per

Curtis Cashen Pro Per

Valen Emil Miller

Appoint Guardian - Person

Temp.

02/04/2026 Petition File Tracking 02/06/2026 LP Labels Needed

Probate Notes are not tentative rulings. Parties and counsel are expected to appear for the hearings unless this note indicates that “no appearance is
necessary.” Unless a personal appearance is required, all participants may appear via Zoom without first securing Court permission using this link:
https://tuolumne-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1615813960?pwd=NTRMT0NwMDg5cnlYdzZ6VnBXWWFsUT09. [Meeting ID: 161 581 3960; Passcode:
123456]. All matters set for hearing in Department 5 are presumptively assigned to that department for all purposes. Parties retain the right under Cal. Const.
art VI §21 to decline consent to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem. By participating in the first hearing, or electing not to attend after due notice
thereof, parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem for the entire case. See CRC 2.816.

This matter was erroneously scheduled for 8:30, but should be heard at 10:00 with the other cases handled by the court investigator. This is the initial hearing on a petition filed by the maternal grandparents to establish a guardianship over one child age 8. This is the natural sibling of the ward presently under guardianship with the same petitioners in PR11794.

Petitioner do not have consent from the bio parents. However, based on the factual summary

provided, immediate intervention is warranted. Per Probate §1513(b): “If the proposed ward is or may be [at risk], the court may refer the matter, in writing, to the local child welfare agency to initiate an investigation pursuant to W&I Code §329. The referral shall include a summary of the reasons for the referral and may include a copy of the petition under Section 1510, the investigator's report filed pursuant to subdivision (a), and any other material information. The probate court shall not hear and determine the petition to appoint a guardian of the minor until the child welfare agency has completed its investigation and has submitted the report to the probate court; [however], the probate court may take any reasonable steps it deems appropriate to protect the child's safety, including, but not limited to, appointing a temporary guardian.”

Petitioner to be informed regarding Family Code §3041: “Before making an order granting custody to a person other than a parent, over the objection of a parent, the court shall make a finding that granting custody to a parent would be detrimental to the child and that granting custody to the nonparent is required to serve the best interest of the child. A finding that parental custody would be detrimental to the child shall be supported by clear and convincing evidence.”

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 8:30 am DA Case # Date Filed

7 PR12740 The Estate of Martin A. Sample 01/06/2026

Amber Sanfeliz Attorney: Brandon Meyer

Martin Sample

Probate Will/Issue Letters

01/06/2026 Petition File Tracking 01/07/2026 LP Labels Needed

Probate Notes are not tentative rulings. Parties and counsel are expected to appear for the hearings unless this note indicates that “no appearance is
necessary.” Unless a personal appearance is required, all participants may appear via Zoom without first securing Court permission using this link:
https://tuolumne-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1615813960?pwd=NTRMT0NwMDg5cnlYdzZ6VnBXWWFsUT09. [Meeting ID: 161 581 3960; Passcode: 123456].
All matters set for hearing in Department 5 are presumptively assigned to that department for all purposes. Parties retain the right under Cal. Const. art VI §21 to
decline consent to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem. By participating in the first hearing, or electing not to attend after due notice thereof, parties
are deemed to have stipulated to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem for the entire case. See CRC 2.816.

This is the initial hearing on a petition to secure letters of administration for a testate estate (aka, will annexed). Based on the petition, decedent directed in a written instrument that the entirely of his estate (estimated to be around $300,000) go “to Valerie Robbin of Coral Gables, Florida, or to her issue by right of representation” – except for a photo album which decedent devised directly to his brother Paul Sample. It is not clear why the petition states that decedent had no next of kin (Para 6.h.) when the will itself states otherwise. Either way, because the will is not self-proving (and in fact is not claimed to be), a DE-131 from a subscribing witness will be required. Notice must be provided directly to decedent’s brother. See §8110(a) and (b). Since the representation that decedent had no heirs appears to be false, this Court will not appoint petitioner or admit the will without identification of all heirs at law and notice to all.

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 10:00 am DA Case # Date Filed

8 PR12704 Guardianship of Clemintine Lynn Garcia 09/23/2025

Wynter Garcia Pro Per

Clementine Lynn Garcia Attorney: Christine Parraz

Bernard Garcia Pro Per

Review Hearing

09/23/2025 Petition File Tracking 09/23/2025 Petition 12/22/2025 High Density

This is continued hearing on a highly-contested guardianship case. On the docket this day are:

1. Appointment of minor’s counsel. Parties were directed to file FL-150s by mid-January to permit this Court to assess options for covering the cost of minor’s counsel (see §1470). Nothing has been filed, though parties made representation that conditions set forth in Appendix E were met.

2. Appointment of supervisor for mother’s visits. Parties were unable to agree on a supervisor. Since the hearing, only MGF Eric has filed FL-324(NP), signifying his willingness to serve.

3. Although parties resolved DVROs with SPCOs, Calaveras made a CACI report against Mother, which impacts Mother’s custodial rights either way.

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 10:00 am DA Case # Date Filed

9 PR12697 Guardianship of Imani Athena Mathiesen 09/05/2025

Lloyd Mathiesen Pro Per

Whitney Mathiesen Pro Per

Imani Athena Mathiesen

Appoint Guardian

FURTHER

09/05/2025 Petition File Tracking 09/08/2025 High Density

This was a “placeholder” petition to establish a guardianship while the parents were incarcerated. Mother has since been released and moved with the child out of county Father remains incarcerated through July. Father was advised to commence his own parentage petition, which he did on 02/03/2026 (see FL19378).

There is no POS on mother in either the guardianship or the new parentage action, and no future date set in the parentage action. It seems likely that the guardianship case can be put to rest and the focus now placed within the family case (where the petitioners can seek grandparent visitation rights).

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 10:00 am DA Case # Date Filed

10 PR12748 Guardianship of Jeremy Twofeather Kerr 01/23/2026

Sandra Aguilar Pro Per

Jeremy Twofeather Kerr Pro Per

Frank Aguilar Pro Per

John Aguilar Pro Per

Petition Hearing

Appoint Guardian - Amended Petition Filed?

01/23/2026 Petition File Tracking

This is the second hearing on a petition to establish a guardianship over one child who presently resides part-time with great grandfather, and part-time with uncle/aunt who have separately sought guardianship.

The child appears to be a member of a federally-recognized tribe, triggered ICWA protections. Bio father is unknown. Mother is incarcerated (see CRF78377). There is a CPO issued against mother protecting great grand-father and child. There is also a partial DV-TRO issued in FL19372 barring mother from having any contact with great grandfather and child, but it only includes a “stay away” from the GGF and not the proposed ward.

If inquiry results in a reason to know the child is an Indian child, then the formal notice

requirements of W&I Code §224.3 apply. See In re D.S. (2020) 46 Cal.App.5th 1041, 1052. Before appointing a temporary guardian of the person for an Indian child over the objection of a parent, tribe, or Indian custodian, the court must: (1) advise the parent or Indian custodian that if they cannot afford counsel, the court will appoint counsel for them under section 1912(b) of the Indian Child Welfare Act; and (2) find, in addition to facts in the petition establishing good cause for the appointment and any other showing the court may require under Probate Code section 2250(b), that the appointment is necessary to prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the child.

Uncle/aunt were supposed to secure bio mom’s consent by visiting her in jail, but the court file does not include the consent.

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 10:00 am DA Case # Date Filed

11 PR12159 Guardianship of John Mark Mutchler 09/06/2022

Hayley Mutchler Attorney: Jennifer Lothert

John Mark Mutchler Pro Per

Review Hearing - Guardian Rept-Probate Code 1513.2

09/06/2022 Petition File Tracking 11/13/2024 From Court-Probate on Calendar

No appearance is necessary.

There being no petition on file to extend the current guardianship, and the ward now having reached the age of majority, this guardianship terminates by operation of law.

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 10:00 am DA Case # Date Filed

12 PR10766 Guardianship of Landen P. Underwood 09/23/2011

Steven Levi Zukal Pro Per

Courtney Lee Zukal Pro Per

Landen Paul Underwood

Review Hearing - Guardian Rept-Probate Code 1513.2

09/23/2011 Petition: Other File Tracking 09/23/2011 Petition 03/13/2025 High Density Other Cases PR10767

This was to be the annual review of a guardianship. However, the absence of a GC-251 prompted this Court to review the file and note that the §1513.2 notice required of the court clerk was issued to the wrong parties. A new notice will need to go out to the current guardian, which a new review date set.

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 10:00 am DA Case # Date Filed

13 PR12380 Guardianship of Malachi Douglas West 12/27/2023

Gordon Douglas Dakin Pro Per

Malachi Douglas West

Review Hearing - Guardian Rept-Probate Code 1513.2

FINAL

12/27/2023 Petition File Tracking 06/24/2024 High Density

No appearance is necessary.

There being no petition on file to extend the current guardianship, and the ward now having reached the age of majority, this guardianship terminates by operation of law.

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 10:00 am DA Case # Date Filed

14 PR12717 Guardianship of Mia Ellyana Faith O'Connor 10/14/2025

Bonnie Ellen O'Connor Pro Per

Faith O'Connor Pro Per

Mia Ellyana Faith O'Connor Pro Per

Appoint Guardian

FURTHER - Long Term

10/14/2025 Petition File Tracking 10/14/2025 Petition 10/23/2025 High Density

This is the continued hearing on a pending temporary guardianship, awaiting graduation to permeances, but delayed as a result of guardian recalcitrance. Some of the issues include: o School tardiness o Lack of awareness of transgressions by others in home o Allowing Joe, Katie, Michelle, to use as crashpad o Drug paraphernalia o Pending CWS inquiry o Family Code §3041.5: “In any guardianship proceeding, the court may order any person who is seeking custody of, or visitation with, a child to undergo testing for the illegal use of substances and the use of alcohol.”

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 10:00 am DA Case # Date Filed

15 FL18703 Analise Inman and Jess Inman 08/23/2024

Analise Inman Attorney:Pro Per Juley Salkeld

Jess Inman Attorney:Pro Per Nathan Nutting

Analise Inman Attorney: Juley Salkeld

Jess Inman

Motion Hearing - Attorney's Fees

Special Set /FURTHER / Bifurcation Status Only?

02/25/2025 OSC Application File Tracking 03/10/2025 High Density

Parties were to have met and conferred regarding: o Mother’s prayer for §2030 fees ($30,000) filed 11/18/2025 o Mother’s prayer for SS (temporary per disso and long-term §4320) o Child support guideline

Mother: o $60.89/hr as radiology technician 25-30 hrs/week b/c kids are home with her during the week Approx $7,400/month o Undisclosed rent? 1 renter (Jaylah); rent amount not disclosed o Undisclosed DoorDash? Father to prove

Father: o $75.22/hr as PG&E troubleshooter 40 hrs/week, plus considerable overtime Approx $18,000/month o Rental property ($1,100/month) o Timeshare 30%

Court will prepare family support calculations

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 1:30 pm DA Case # Date Filed

16 FL19126 Jane Broderson vs. Ashkan Yahyaie 07/18/2025

Jane Broderson Pro Per

Ashkan Yahyaie

Ashkan Yahyaie

Jane Broderson

Ashkan Yahyaie Pro Per

Jane Broderson

Review Hearing - TRO/Domestic Violence

10/03/2025 OSC Application File Tracking 10/06/2025 High Density

DVRO lapsed on 10/10/2025. This was to be a review hearing to determine whether mutual ROs would be needed, despite Petitioner’s strong objection to anything on her record. There have been no filings since October. Hearing date to be vacated and Court will await word from the parties as to whether additional intervention is needed.

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 1:30 pm DA Case # Date Filed

17 FL18336 Margaret Hardman and Kristofer Hardman 10/27/2023

Margaret Hardman Attorney: Juley Salkeld

Kristofer Hardman Attorney: Sally Chenault

Settlement Conference parties asked to appear at 2PM

10/27/2023 Petition File Tracking 04/29/2025 From Court-Family on Calendar

Complex dissolution settlement conference; nearing complete resolution but stalled when the game clock ran out last time.

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 1:30 pm DA Case # Date Filed

18 CV67983 Petition of Vanessa Smith 01/12/2026

Vanessa Smith Pro Per

OSC Hearing - Name Change

01/12/2026 Petition File Tracking 01/16/2026 High Density

Related to: FL18259 – disso and DV-TRO voluntarily dismissed (reconciliation?) FL19159 – disso with DV-TRO converted to SPCO; requesting “Aguilar” CV67893 – CH-TRO vs Doug’s gf granted, converted to SPCO

No proof of publication for name change and proposed new name is not restoration of former triggering avoidance of publication cost/requirement. She had a default and made disclosures so disso could bifurcate soon. Publication can be avoided under CCP §1277(b) based on the DV-TRO and CH-TRO except that petitioner must also be an active participant in the Safe At Home address confidentiality program and that the name the petitioner is seeking to acquire is on file with the Secretary of State.

2/23/2026 8:32 am

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger

Department 5 February 27, 2026 3:30 pm DA Case # Date Filed

19 FL17648 Mark Brooks and Samantha Brooks 06/03/2022

Mark Brooks Attorney: Alonzo Gradford

Samantha Brooks Attorney: Nathan Nutting

Hearing: Other

in Chambers 3 minors

06/03/2022 Petition File Tracking 12/23/2024 High Density Other Cases FL17626

Need to reschedule (again) due to conflict

2/23/2026 8:32 am